ECC Conference - Moving AWP To The Next Level - r7
ECC Conference - Moving AWP To The Next Level - r7
№
Year: Date: Location:
49 2017 Sept 7 Boca Raton, FL
Advanced Work Packaging – Moving to the Next Level
Facilitator Panel Members
Å Assessments
4. Identify the priority sequences for CWPs, EWPs, and PWPs based on STEP 1, Area 2
Area 2 Area 4
Area 5
Area 9
Implementation – Contractor Perspective
AWP STEP 3 – EWP and PWP Execution
• This step focuses on the execution and completion of the EWP’s and PWP’s. Key steps
include:
11%
17%
Yes
No
Not sure
72%
Å Create a strong AWP culture and support within the EPCs for its
implementation and execution, as well as engineering and
procurement data standardization.
2.00 80%
60%
Productivity Scale
§ >1.0 Good
1.00 40%
40%
§ = 1.0 On-Budget
§ <1.0 Bad
20%
20%
Accelerated
realization of PF Historical Piping PF Profile
0.00 0%
Mar 0% Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Mar
Mar Apr
Apr May
May Jun
Jun Jul
Jul Aug
Aug Sep
Sep Oct
Oct Nov
Nov Dec
Dec Jan
Jan Feb
Feb Mar
Mar Apr
Apr May
May Jun
Jun Jul
Jul Aug
Aug Sep
Sep Oct
Oct Nov
Nov Dec
Dec
Incr.
Baseline
Baseline Cum.
Target
Target Targ.
Actual
Actual
United States
Sasol (WFP)
Lyondell (AWP/WFP) New Delhi
LCM (AWP/WFP)
Citrus (WFP) Manila
Greensville (WFP)
Vogtle (WFP)
Mosaic (AWP/WFP)
Santiago
South America
BHP Billiton (AWP/WFP)
Results – Overall Assessment
The following quote and results are from a report from a third party consultant hired by the owner
for a major project in Alberta, Canada.
“The Fluor system for Workface Planning is mature, well developed and is compliant with the
Clients procedures and intent. The creation of IWPs is having a significant positive impact in field
level productivity”
Direct
27.0% Support
24.0% 24.0%
Delay
36.0% 32.0% 29.0%
Å Results expected:
– Improved productivity DELIVERY
– Cost certainty
– Schedule certainty
– Reduced HSE exposure
– Improved quality