Complex Designs
Complex Designs
Rabia Farooq
Complex Designs
• Researchers often investigate the effects of two or more independent
variables simultaneously; this type of experiment is referred to as a
complex design.
• The simplest complex design has two independent variables (IVs) and
one dependent variable (DV). The simplest independent variable has two
levels (conditions
• Complex designs are also called factorial designs.
• An experiment conducted by Baaren and his colleagues (2004)
conducted an experiment using 2 x 2 design to see whether mimicry
(coping) helps in promoting pro social (helping) behaviors
2 x 2 design
• The factorial design with 2 independent variables both with 2 levels
is called a 2 x 2 design (read “2 by 2"). It has four conditions.
• So what is meant by
• 2x2 x2
• 2x2 x2 x2
Research hypothesis
• Mimicry increases helpfulness.
• 1st Experiment: Single IV was manipulated using RGD.
• IV… 2 levels….mimicry or non mimicry.
• DV… whether they were helping.
• One group was randomly assigned to mimicry or another to non
mimicry group and than DV was assessed.
• All participants in the mimicry group whereas 33% of non mimicry
group helped.
• 2nd Experiment to test whether helped the participant other than the
experimenter.
• Same IV as in 1st experiment were used.
• New experimenter was not a manipulated variable after completing
the 1st experiment the new experimenter entered in the room.
• Mimicked one 84% copy.
• None mimicked one 48 % copy.
•
Main Effect
• The overall effect of an independent variable In a complex design is called a
main effect.
• The effect one IV has on other DV or second IV have on another DV.
• The main effect is the effect of the independent variable on the
dependent variable as if only that variable was manipulated in the experiment
Interaction Effect
• The combined effect of independent variables in a complex design is called
an interaction effect.
• An interaction effect occurs when the effect of an independent
variable differs depending on the level of the second independent variable.
• The effect one IV with interaction to another IV have on DV
Single Case
Research Design
Single Subject
Case Experimental or
study small n research
metho design
d
Single Case Research Design
It uses only one case or one group to investigate specific phenomena.
It has been found useful in experiments of perception, memory, and
classical conditioning.
Used by Freud to develop Psychoanalytic theory.
Study individual organism.
Case Study Method
Characteristics
It frequently describes the application and results of a particular
treatment.
E,g., a clinical report of a case study may describe an individual
symptoms, methods used to understand and treat symptoms and evidence
for treatment effectiveness… does provide a potentially rich source of
information about the individual.
Aspects of Control
It is descriptive and exploratory in nature.
In some cases is the only option…Some information is better than
none.
Many aspects make it unique.
Affective in isolating relationship.
Source of hypothesis and ideas about normal and abnormal behaviors
Baseline Stage
Situation or state prior to administration of IV is called a baseline.
Selection of some behavior …dependent variable
Repeated recording of behavior to obtain a stable measure prior to
administration of IV….
DV should have following characteristics
Objectively measurable
Easily emitted by subject or emitted at length without fatigue.
Sensitive to change that occur in situation
E.g., bed wetting; in no of sec eye contact ; no of headaches reported
by sufferer.
Using baseline researcher s are able to predict what will be like in
future with treatment
Removal of IV
When DV during 2nd stage stabilize the IV is removed so subjects
experienced the same situation as baseline stage.
LOGIC OF THE DESIGN
To demonstrate cause and effect relationship.
Baseline A Treatment B
Advantages
Scientifically sound investigation with one and few subjects
Allows control
Less chance of secondary variation
No statistical tests required in initial designs
Flexible
Easily interpretable
Disadvantages
Hard to determine causality
Not appropriate for certain types of researches as ex post facto
researches.
Much time in studying most individuals.
Due to excessive variability at baseline difficult to interpret at
treatment stage.
Limited external validity
AB design
Simplest strategy to study an individual behavior with and without
experimental treatment.
DV…Operationally defined and measured throughout the study.
A… baseline of behavior (DV)
B…. Treatment that cause change in behavior (cause change in DV).
E.g., a teacher is interested in decreasing students time out of chair.
A (Baseline)… No of times student is not sitting for 1 hour. B (treatment)…
delivery of reinforcement every time he sits)
Lacks internal validity
Confounding variable.
Individual might be
abnormal with respect to
behavior being measured
ABA Design A B A
An addition of A after B
To see whether behavior reverses. Student sitting behavior.
Improves to identify confounding variable.
To determine cause and effect
2 opportunities to determine effect of treatment variable ….AB ___ BA
transition
Weaknesses includes as study ends at A individual deprived of
treatment.
AB AB AB Design
Used to reduce chance of coincidence.
ABCB Design
Variation of ABAB design
See effects of two different variables
ANOVA Can be used.
Advantages
Used in those situations in which IV can not be manipulated due to
physical and social restraints.
When time and funds are limited.
Disadvantages
Inability to assign subjects randomly to different treatment conditions
in an experiment. Other characteristics of subjects are confounding.
(Solution is match the subject on confounding variable).
Convenient sampling often found…. Issue of external validity.
Detection Bias (Feinstein, 1977)
Identification of members based on archival records threats internal
validity
Relative
RELATIVErisk
RISK ratio
RATION
High STRESS
GROUP LOW STRESS GROUP
100 subjects of high 100 subjects of low stress
stress group group
Frequency of cancer= Frequency of Relative
cancer= 5risk
20 subjects subjects ratio = 20/100
Frequency of no Frequency of ÷
no5/100
cancer=
cancer= 80 95 20/100 ×
5/100= 4