PWC - Internal Audit Transformation
PWC - Internal Audit Transformation
a transformational view
By Budi Santoso SE, Ak, MForAccy, PGCS, CA, CFE, CPA (Aust.)
Director Risk Consulting & Financial Crime Territory Leader
Budi Santoso SE, Ak, MForAccy, PGCS, CA, CFE, CPA (Aust.)
BACKGROUND
Budi Santoso is Director in PWC’s Forensic Services and Financial Crime Unit Leader, based in the Jakarta office. Budi
has more than 16 years of experience in Indonesia and other countries in South East Asia conducting corruption/fraud and
money laundering investigations, asset tracing, litigation support, designing, implementing and evaluating anti-fraud programs
(both prevention and detection), fraud risk assessment, internal control assessment and improvement, compliance due diligence,
US FCPA & UK ABAC reviews, business process reviews, good corporate governance reviews and business intelligence. An
experienced trainer, he is also capable in leading internal audit, compliance, and antifraud and investigation unit transformation.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• 10 years : worked for the elite Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), serving as Head of the Commissioner’s
Office, Head of the Prevention Secretariat, and also as an investigator/examiner.
• 2 years : Senior Manager in the Fraud Investigation and Disputes team at Ernst & Young (EY) Indonesia
• 2.5 years : Senior Director for Kroll in the Singapore office
• 3.5 years : Director of Training for the Association of Certified Fraud Examiner (ACFE) Indonesia Chapter and
• 2 years : Board Member ACFE Singapore Chapter.
1 The Challenges
2 GRC Overview
9 Anti-fraud Management
pessimism
More than half of the CEOs we surveyed believe the rate of global GDP growth will decline. This caution has translated into CEOs’ low confidence in their own
organisation’s outlook.
1. Growth
Uncertainty undermines outlook
2. Technology regulation
Setting up guard rails in cyberspace
3. Upskilling
To upskill or not to upskill is no longer the question
4. Climate change
An opportunity cloaked in crisis
world
1. Question: How concerned are you, if at all, about each of these potential economic, policy, social, environmental
and business threats to your organisation’s growth prospects? (showing only ‘extremely concerned’)
Global North America Western Europe Asia-Pacific
Over-regulation 36% Cyber threats 50% Over-regulation 36% Trade conflicts 38%
Trade conflicts 35% Policy uncertainty 42% Trade conflicts 36% Uncertain economic growth 35%
Uncertain economic growth 34% Trade conflicts 42% Cyber threats 35% Availability of key skills 33%
Cyber threats 33% Over-regulation 38% Geopolitical uncertainty 31% Speed of technological change 31%
Policy uncertainty 33% Geopolitical uncertainty 33% Availability of key skills 30% Over-regulation 30%
Availability of key skills 32% Availability of key skills 33% Populism 29% Protectionism 29%
Geopolitical uncertainty 30% Uncertain economic growth 32% Policy uncertainty 27% Policy uncertainty 28%
Speed of technological change 29% Speed of technological change 30% Protectionism 26% Cyber threats 27%
Protectionism 28% Protectionism 30% Uncertain economic growth 26% Geopolitical uncertainty 27%
Populism 27% Changing consumer behaviour 22% Climate change and environmental damage 25% Climate change and environmental damage 26%
1%
7.5% North America
Wave 1 (to early 2020s) 3% 16%
3% Latin America
7.0%
14%
Western Europe
19% 6.5%
Wave 2 (to late 2020s) 23% Middle East 12%
10% 6.0%
Africa
10%
44% 5.5%
Asia-Pacific
Wave 3 (to mid-2030s) 36%
5.0% 8%
11% CEE
2005 2010 2015 2020 1960 1980 2000 2020
Source: PwC, Will robots really steal our jobs? An Source: OECD Source: PwC, 23rd Annual Global CEO Survey Source: World Bank Group
international analysis of the potential long term-impact of Base: Global respondents (2020=1,581; 2015=1,322)
automation
2010 2020
30%
25%
16%
13% 14%
5%
Our response to climate change initiatives will Climate change initiatives will lead to significant new My organisation will benefit from government funds
provide a reputational advantage for my organisation product and service opportunities for my organisation or financial incentives for ‘green’ investments
among key stakeholders, including employees
The money was moved to accounts in Sri Lanka and the Philippines.
But it turned out Bangladesh Bank hadn’t initiated those transfers.
Eliminate Protect
Protect Manage Secure
Threat Reputation
Reputation Crisis Value
Threat Remediate
16
Contents
• Menfasilitasi 1st line untuk • Mengelola risiko dan kontrol • Meningkatkan hasil
mendapatkan informasi dari dan • Mengelola dan menguji kontrol pengujian/penilaian cakupan audit
menyediakan informasi kepada • Mengelola kebijakan pada 1st dan 2nd line.
pertanggungan jawab 2nd dan 3rd line • Melakukan audit secara menyeluruh
• Melakukan penilaian risiko
• Mengeksekusi kontrol yang termasuk perencanaan,
“tertanam” • Mengautomasi manajemen
anggaran/timesheet, lingkupan,
• Automasi kontrol / perbaikan secara compliance, manajemen kebijakan,
pengujian, pekerjaan, dan laporan
berkelanjutan dan proses lainnya
audit
• Mendorong maturitas risiko dalam
perusahaan
Teknologi GRC
Current State
Future State
Business Strategy
COSO ERM
Business
Management
Business Platform
Audit Penilaiaan
Evaluasi/
Compliance Analisis
CSA Aksi
Pemantauan
BCM
KRI
indicators Measure
Escalation Triggers Pemicu Eskalasi - Memfasilitasi intervensi sebelum risiko
muncul di luar toleransi yang dapat diterima; mereka
(Reactive) dilaporkan setelah pemicu yang telah ditentukan terputus. Escalation Control Effective
Measure, Volume
triggers Measure
Lagging measures – Kinerja di masa lalu yang menjadi tolak
Lagging Indicators ukur hasil kinerja (berdasarkan fakta).
Contoh: pencurian
Skenario ancaman
Threat Vector Attack Surface
Kontrol/ pengendali
Identifikasi Contoh:
kredensial dan data pribadi Contoh: Contoh: Primary:
karyawan pishing Email edukasi &
Proteksi kesadaran
Secondary:
Deteksi Secure
email
Tanggapan gateway
Pemulihan
Dengan melakukan identifikasi impact dan likelihood atas risiko yang terjadi Data Breach
Unplanned Outage
● Respon yang lebih baik untuk ekspektasi peraturan dari analitis yang
Contoh: Dampak risiko dari peraturan baru (misalnya, aturan pencurian
lebih luas yang mendasari penilaian risiko, manajemen perubahan
Respon Regulasi yang Lebih baik identitas) dievaluasi lebih baik dengan meninjau keluaran dari penilaian
peraturan, pemantauan, audit dan pelaporan kegiatan
BU yang ada, dan dimasukkan ke dalam tinjauan risiko berikutnya
● Mengurangi kesulitan dalam mempersiapkan permintaan regulasi
● Manajemen senior akan memiliki visibilitas ke dalam informasi waktu Contoh: Menerapkan pelaporan risiko yang mengintegrasikan data di
Peningkatan Visibilitas ke dalam
nyata dan risiko kritis yang muncul dan masalah kepatuhan / semua kelompok kontrol utama yang terkait dengan risiko kritis akan
Efektivitas Risiko / Kontrol
kekhawatiran untuk membuat keputusan yang tepat memberikan pandangan risiko yang terkonsolidasi untuk manajemen.
Lebih dari 50% organisasi pada saat ini kurang percaya diri akan
Keuntungan dari manajemen risiko digital
pengeluaran mereka terkait dengan cyber:
Terintegrasi dengan keputusan pada kebutuhan modal saat terdapat Tantangan dari operasi
kejadian cyber yang berat1 dapat ditangani secara
terpercaya oleh pimpinan
Memiliki kontrol terkini terkait teknologi yang sedang berkembang selain CIO
(seperti AI, IoT, blockchain, robotic process automation,
1: PwC, Global Digital Trust Insights 2021, Cybersecurity comes of age
virtual/augmented reality)1
Pemberdayaan teknologi Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) terdiri dari sekumpulan solusi risiko dan
kepatuhan yang saling terintegrasi untuk mengasimilasikan informasi yang bermakna terkait risiko dan kontrol.
Hal tersebut membantu perusahan untuk secara lebih proaktif mengelola risiko dan usaha serta program
kepatuhan dengan lebih efektif dan efisien.
01
Meningkatkan internal, kepatuhan dan jaminan kualitas serta dengan
kapabilitas GRC lebih bisnis. Karenanya, GRC harus memahami risiko terkait
data risiko dan Risiko
Manajemen kepatuhan dinamis bisnis dan lingkungan bisnis menuju masa depan digital.
Digital
register Risiko
Konsolidasi, teknologi,
integrasi, dan ancaman, dan
Tanpa pendekatan global yang didukung oleh semua
migrasi kelemahan pemangku kepentingan, GRC tidak dapat memenuhi
Board dan
potensinya. Kami dapat membantu manajemen dalam
manajemen harus
Pihak
ketiga
Audit
Otomasi
02 memahami
hubungan antara
GRC dan kinerja
menentukan pendekatan GRC global, bertarget, berharga,
dan terukur. Dengan pengalaman bisnis kami, kami dapat
memberikan masukan tentang komunikasi perubahan dan
Memahami
risiko GRC pengawasan
temuan dan
dukungan selama implementasi.
menyeluruh
masalah
yang muncul
dari pihak
Selama beberapa tahun terakhir, implementasi ERM
ketiga
Membangun berdasarkan kerangka COSO merupakan 'topik hangat'.
pendekatan terintegrasi Keunggulan kompetitif berasal dari pendekatan terintegrasi
Business
Continuity
Kejelasan terhadap
Compliance
Implementasi
proses standar
03 GRC untuk
mendapatkan nilai
tambah yang nyata
yang mencakup GRC, pengendalian internal, audit internal
dan kualitas dengan tujuan menyiapkan perbaikan proses
yang efisien dan untuk tujuan sinergi.
CSA berdasarkan
hasil tes dari BC
Proses Control Self kewajiban
Assessment
Alat digital baru yang diterapkan dalam operasi bisnis
sehari-hari dan perubahan teknologi berarti bahwa manajer
Mengembangkan risiko harus dilatih untuk mengidentifikasi dan memitigasi
04 kemampuan &
platform GRC yang
siap secara digital
risiko baru. GRC harus menjadi lebih dinamis dalam hal
mencakup beberapa area / fungsi dan menghubungkannya.
Unggah data dari sejumlah Unggah dokumentasi pendukung Ganti beberapa template dengan Menyamakan template dan Membagikan informasi dan
sumber dan sistem yang berbeda secara terstruktur satu sumber terpercaya taksonomi di seluruh organisasi bekerja secara efisien di tiga lapis
pertahanan
Mendorong perilaku dan tindakan Analisis dan visualisasi data tingkat lanjut menghasilkan wawasan, tren, dan Manajemen akses untuk
melalui pemberitahuan otomatis pembandingan yang bermakna. Dashboard kemajuan yang real time untuk melindungi organisasi dan
dan alur kerja menyederhanakan manajemen proyek memastikan informasi dilindungi.
• ServiceNow
• MetricStream
• Archer
• Open Pages (Financial Services)
• SAI Global / BWise
• SAP/Oracle/Microsoft
• Satori ACL
• Workday/Salesforce/…
• Protecht
• Riskman
• CGR
• Readinow
Investigative Consultative
• Interviewing • Discussing
• Post-event checking • Pre-event mitigating
• Finding • Finding solutions
accountabilities • Curious
• Suspicious • Anticipative
Sumber: The Institute of Internal Auditors
Transformasi Mindset
The business environment has changed and continues We relish the challenge of We tailor oursolutions Our stakeholder look to us to Our approach is
and continues to change affecting every organisation, in supporting businessesfacing to match our act as a trustedpartner. leading edge and
the biggest change and the stakeholder needs. constantlyevolving.
every market, to one degree or another. As the risk greatestcomplexity. Our distinctive skills and
landscape expands and with it the complexity of doing the We make sure our IA experience are strengthened We have a forward looking
business, challenges and opportunities are being created. It We help identify, prioritise function has the agility and by specialists from the wider approachenabling our
and give assurance over the
is essential for organisations to be ready to respond, but it’s capability to stay in tune firm. We bring technical organisation to act
risks thatmatter. with our businessstrategy. excellence, industry insight decisively, move fasterand
by no means easy. Boards and senior management are being and an objectiveperspective. grow sustainability.
placed under unprecedented pressure to stay on top of
current and emerging risks – for which they require We help you navigate the
opportunities presented
increasingly specialised assurance. Internal Audit has by an expanding risk
emerged as a key means of giving boards the confidence to landscape.
deal with demands of a dynamic market place.
Championing the function
Stakeholders expect Internal Audit to ‘look deeper and see The internal audit function Boards – should expect more support and value from Internal
further’, acting as a lever for change supporting an should recognise the Audit. This may include a
organisation’s strategic agenda. The time has come for responsibilty to support the greater role in supporting the strategic agenda.
Internal Audit to be bold, courageous and innovative in value of the internal audit as it Management – should expect more agility and insight from
order to capitalise on a growing need to provide strategic evolves and transitions to meet Internal Audit. This might include assisting the business and
insight. Understanding this may be daunting prospect, the demands of modern in establishing root cause and driving positive change,
business. leveraging it unique insight across the whole organisation.
especially if new skills are required, but it’s a challenge
worth taking on. The increased comfort gained by the The internal audit should aim Heads of Internal Audit – should expect greater support
organisation and its wider stakeholder group will likely to play a key role in and investment in their Internal Audit functions. Heads of
mean more freedom for Internal Audit to operate in a way it strengthening the profile, Internal Audit should also expect to be consulted on the design
should and will result in greater value for money. credentials and value of Internal and implementation of new initiatives – drawing on business
Auditors everywhere and in doing acumen and networks beyond the organisation.
so, help organisations meet the
demands of their dynamic
marketplace and an expanding
risk landscape.
PwC | Strictly private and confidential 39
Staying relevant with business goals and challenges (3/3)
One of the role of Internal Audit is providing assurance.
An effective Assurance Framework (refer to the diagram in the right) will • A good governance • An effective risk framework
framework will ensure that ensures that there is clear
ensure that all assurance activity is aligned to the key risk and controls all of these elements fit understanding, ownership and
areas, ensuring no duplication of assurance activity and as importantly together. How each is monitoring of key risks.
reported, how committees • With the demerger, you have
no gaps in assurance. The key is to keep this simple but effective. are structured, how recognised there is an
information flows and key opportunity to further enhance
decisions made. your risk processes, to move
• Setting good governance from risk reporting to a more
Governance Risk
around your Assurance Framework Framework
embedded risk management
Framework will be process that works for The
important, for both Client.
Management and the • We will work with you to
Audit Committee. review your existing risk
Internal
processes, advising on ideas
audit Controls for enhancement and
simplification, and how these
will feed into the Internal Audit
Existing plan development.
assurance
providers
• 4
Using the outputs of the review
of the assurance providers, an
Internal Audit plan will be • There will be an opportunity to
developed which focuses on the review your existing Internal
areas that need further Control framework (ICF); most
independent assurance. importantly to ensure the
• This considers what is the right controls are the right ones, but
balance of assurance across all of • A review of the existing sources of also to start to consider
the ‘lines of defence’ proportionate assurance, for example, branch audits, whether further automation
to the level of risk. will ensure they are focussed on the and efficiency is possible.
• It is an opportunity to consider the right area and performed in an effective • Over time, a review of the use
type of assurance you want way. of Oracle to further automate
through the Internal Audit route, • Assessing the effectiveness of the control activity will further
balancing a more traditional other assurance providers will consider support this.
‘policeman’ approach with more if other methodologies / approaches • Similarly, a review of the use
‘consultative’ or agile approaches could be adopted to develop their of data techniques could drive
which we consider in more detail delivery. efficiency in the monitoring and
in the following pages. testing of the ICF.
• Strategy
Stakeholder • Structure
Technology • People
Value protection manage-
• Process
ment • Technology
Internal
Audit
Quality Cost
and Value creation effective-
innovation ness
Service Talent
culture model
An illustration
Target Heads of Internal Audit Up-sell to C-Suite and NEDs
1. Elevate the status of 2. Increase understanding 3. Make our offer clear, comprehensive
Internal Audit internally of the value of our offer internally and and consistent.
and externally. externally.
Value
protection 4
Assessing regulation and compliance
within the current business processes,
systems and controls
I U
A. Stakeholder
alignment
E A
A. Stakeholder Alignment B. Critical Risk Focus C. Talent Model Alignment
• What are the expectations • How well aligned are • How adequate are IA’s I U
B. Critical risk
of IA’s key stakeholders? audits to the skills for both today and
focus
organization’s most tomorrow? E A
• How confident are you
critical risks?
that IA is meeting them? • How effective is IA as a
I U
• How appropriate is the source of talent for your C. Talent model
mix of audits? organization? alignment
E A
I U
D. Quality and
D. Quality and Innovation E. Use of Technology innovation
E A
• How is IA quality • How extensively is
measured and assessed? Attributes technology leveraged?
E. Use of
I U
• What innovation of • What are the most technology
E A
initiatives are underway? significant IA challenges
Excellence related to technology?
I U
F. Relationship
management
E A
I U
F. Relationship Management G. Cost-effective Services H. Client Service Culture G. Cost-effective
services
• What is IA’s approach to • What are IA’s primary • How are business and E A
managing key stakeholder productivity metrics? ‘soft’ skills emphasized?
relationships? I U
• In what ways have audit • How consistently are H. Client service
processes been analyzed tough issues handled culture
E A
for efficiencies? well?
How do you see your organization addressing your priority areas going
forward? Let’s probe a little further….
Improve Excess Urgent Action Appropriate
• Why less important? • Why less important? • What’s the key issue • How is high performance
Improve Urgent Action The relative importance of
Higher
this area?
PwC | Strictly private and confidential • Cost of not taking • Opportunities to • Cost of not taking action?
action? refocus resources? • Benefits of further
48
Lower Importance → Higher
progress?
Attributes of a “high-performing”Internal Audit function
Align value proposition with stakeholders' expectations Focus on critical risks and issues An illustration
• Mission and vision are clearly articulated and communicated • The audit planning risk assessment and resource allocation is based on
• Scope of services are well-defined and communicated a top-down, strategic view of business risk
• A strategic plan captures future vision and milestones towards the • The audit plan contains sufficient flexibility to respond to emerging risks
desired future state and business issues
• The balanced scorecard includes metrics to measure progress • Enterprise, emerging and fraud risks are captured in the risk assessment
toward the stated mission and vision • Internal audit has a clearly-defined role in governance, risk and
compliance assurance
Leverage technology effectively
Engage and manage stakeholder relationships
• Audit management systems are used to improve
audit effectiveness and efficiency
• Stakeholders perceive internal audit as operationally
• Technology is utilized to improve audit process excellent, a key business partner and, where
efficiency through data retrieval and testing, data appropriate, a provider of strategic support
mining and analytics
• Capture expectations, communications strategies
• Continuous audit techniques are leveraged to and timelines
increase audit coverage and provide early warning
• Seek feedback regularly and capture on both a one-
of risk indicators
on-one and survey basis
• Specific steps are taken to capture and share
• Communicate value delivered to stakeholders on a
knowledge throughout the internal audit and the
periodic basis
business
• GRC tools are leveraged to ensure related activities Deliver cost effective services
are efficient and coordinated
• The staffing model effectively leverages
Promote quality improvement and innovation management, staff, geographic and external
resources to efficiently complete audit activities
• Applicable quality standards have been defined • Productivity is actively measured and managed to
and communicated ensure the most cost-effective delivery of services
• Formal quality reviews are regularly completed • Audit processes are standardized and simplified to
to ensure improvement opportunities are be cost effective
identified • Investments in audit infrastructure are based on a
• Innovation is embedded in the culture of internal disciplined ROI approach
audit and is consistently fostered and rewarded
• Training plans include elements to improve • An appropriate mix of core internal audit and specialist
business acumen, judgment and staff exists to complete required activities in the internal
perspective audit mission and vision
• All services provided balance • A formal career path for internal audit staff has been
independence, objectivity and value defined and has the support of senior leadership in the
• Cultural bias toward customer service organization
• Metrics measure key customer satisfaction • A continuous learning and development model exists to
based on stakeholder expectations improve internal audit's knowledge of the business,
experience and credentials
• Staff performance is measured against the
PwC | Strictly private and confidential mission/vision of internal audit
49
4 Internal Audit Digitally fit function:
impact of technology innovation
50
Contents
4 Business Transformation
An illustration
Building
confidence
in a future-
Comprehensive range of fit business
specialists; team built around
business imperatives; focused on
delivering insight and foresight;
creating a holistic system of risk Collaborative; flexible
management; implementing and imaginative; immersed
solutions (not just reporting them). in the business.
Capabilities Culture
Full in-house
Full Full • Implementation of Internal Audit function using
internal in-house only internal resources How PwC
staffing
can help
Significant co-sourcing
Significant • CAE is supported fully by outsourced
co-sourcing resources
• Specialised skill & geographic coverage are
readily available
Limited Full Outsourcing
internal • Implementation of internal
sourcing audit function by external
staffing
provider
Advisory Outsourcing
Options and alternatives
services
Co-sourcing
Audit plan
Traditional Approach
Traditional “bottom-up” approach Evaluate Impact of Risks within Audit Universe
based on stakeholder interviews and
analysis. Focus is on coverage of
identified risk areas, geography and Identify Risks (Financial Operations, Compliance)
business operations.
• Understand what the strategic • Inventory of existing skills • Align Internal Audit with • Reduce the labor content of
objectives of the organisation organisation’s strategic audits by increasing the
• Conduct gap analysis
are objectives effectiveness of lower-risk
• Determine adequacy of audits
Stakeholder Value • Reduce audit cycle time by
resources to respond to all key
conducting more targeted • Provide real time monitoring of
risks
• Understand what audits significant risks
drives/devalues stakeholder Talent Management • Increase value derived from • Explore areas where
value within the organisation focus on higher-risk areas technology can streamline or
• Use of internal and external
Strategic Risks standardise a process
resources • Improve communication to
stakeholders through concise, • Test entire data populations
• Understand what the strategic • Consider implementing a
impactful reports electronically
risks of the organisation are rotational staffing model to
attract and retain talent
A comprehensive approach to enhancing Internal Audit’s value proposition by addressing two strategic dimensions.
1. Realigning audit
coverage
Significantly More Value
How? 2. Improving processes and
• By incorporating an accepted model of value leveraging technology
creation
1. Realigning audit coverage & performance as a reference point for
identifying risk. How?
• By evaluating risk based on its impact to • By focusing audit services on significant risks &
promote controls, & leveraging self-assessment.
or reduce shareholder value.
• By reassessing the HR model to align skill sets with
• By identifying emerging risk through an future audit focus & leveraging offshoring & outsourcing
industry to gain needed skills.
sector lens & the associated risk & audit
• By reassessing the HR model to align skill sets with
impact.
future audit focus & leveraging offshoring & outsourcing
2. Improving process and • By creating an audit plan prioritized based on
results of a value-oriented risk assessment.
•
to gain needed skills.
By streamlining reporting processes; automating
leveraging technology reporting & tracking; & using a range of technologies in
the audit process for (1) data analysis & storage (2) risk
Significantly More Value assessments & monitoring & (3) collaboration.
Organisation
Technology
Technology
Eg review of large
commercial contract for
An illustration
Future State of Internal
compliance but also to Audit
establish if services can be
delivered at reduced cost Current Risk
Risk Management
Management Maturity
Assurance
Eg review of month
end reports to ensure
all key controls are
Compliance reconciled
Through capitalizing the new data-driven business available from business activities and external sources, Internal Audit can apply new
techniques by embedding data analytics during audit process. Therefore, Internal Audit can provide the management with new insights
that cannot be captured with the traditional method. Following are the benefits on implementing Data Analytics during audit process:
Increase audit scope Increased efficiency New analysis method Continuous Monitoring Reduce Cost
Audit process can now Manual audit procedures Usage of data visualization Monitoring process can be Lower operational cost by
capture 100% of can be reduced to analyse trends in the done continuously through maximizing data driven
populations, rather than data data procedures
selected samples
Change Management
Embed a continuous Risk Sensing Diversify the scope and Leverage data to identify
process that uses external and nature of audit activities. behavioral trends and root
internal sources of data for Issues based reviews, audit cause.
identification of risk areas insight workshops and more.
Influence the
Provide greater Scope and execute strengthening of first
Uncover human
Identify blind spots, coverage across audits virtually, with a and second line
behavioural patterns
previously humanly organization without data driven and risk defences through
through machine
impossible increasing audit based targeted digital collaboration
learning and regression
resources precision and continuous
monitoring
The internal audit’s stakeholder group has expanded and expectations are heightened. Change is fast and risks are complex and
interconnected. As it transforms, Internal Audit can collaborate with first and second line functions in data-driven ways not previously
possible. By doing so, reduce the likelihood of blind spots or significant issues materializing.
The three lines of defence can identify common sources of data and synergize data retrieval and analysis, so that each group is working
efficiently and developing insights from a common foundation. And internal audit teams can share and other tools that can become real-time
monitoring capabilities for the first and second line of defence. There are many opportunities. With an eye toward the broader risk
capabilities of the organization, the internal audit can be a catalyst for bringing a greater level of insight and more effective assurance to the
management team
▪ Identify risk ▪ Preliminary “scan” of ▪ Identify anomalies, ▪ Provide quantifiable ▪ Provide an automated
assessment relevant audit trends, and potential fact-based basis for continuous
Key Activity priorities information to drive fraud indicators information for auditing & control
▪ Determine scope of project scope, ▪ Replace sample reportable issues monitoring
audit plan activities sampling, and testing approaches and exceptions ▪ Provide analytical
fieldwork procedures with full coverage ▪ Visualizations of input for follow-up
data analytics audit findings Risk Assessment
Sources: Publically available information, including company websites, codes of conduct and annual reports
1PwC risk culture survey completed by over 500 Global Banking leaders. Results published in
“Cure for the common culture: how to build a healthy risk culture”, 2014
Talent Management
• Embed into hiring, development
and incentives
Source: Cure for the common culture: how to build a healthy risk culture, PwC 2014
PwC | Strictly private and confidential 112
Call to Action: Inspire the risk culture you desire
To deliver and sustain changes in risk culture, consider some of the following
risk culture “leading practices”
Visible Consequences Creative Tension Redeploy Talent
Analyze star performers “Business” leaders own Catalyze behavior change
and take corrective actions risk culture, however risk through by redeployment
where the right business management empowered across “Business” and
results are delivered with to override decisions. control functions.
the wrong behaviors.
Align/Rationalize Rigorous background
ethics/culture/behavioral checks & attitudinal
change programs as required screening
Governance
Governance
Organizational Regulatory
Internal Fraud External Fraud Alert Vetting
Design Reporting
Governance Governance
Internal/
Event Response
Staffing Model Ext Referrals
Technology
Governance
Surveillance/ Rule Definition &
Analytics Case Management Authentication Forensics
Monitoring Optimisation
Performance metrics
Pressures Rationalisation
Pressure Rationalisation
Capability
Intelligence &
Stress
Creativity
Typical traits of
Capability
Coercion
5 Ineffective monitoring
6 Silos
8 Crisis management
• Internal
• Background checks
• Third Party
• Vendor/customer/third-party
• Regulatory
due diligence
• Anti-bribery
• Integrity due diligence
• Incident response retainers
• Asset trading
• Cybercrime • Current state assessment
• Social and political risk
• Anti-trust and system design
mapping and assessments
• Employee misconduct • Integrated security
• Sexual harassment programme management
• Incident management and
• Anti-bribery and corruption Risk emergency response
• Anti-money laundering Due Diligence • Strategic security leadership
• Sanctions • Security audits
• Training and awareness
Programs
• Cyber analytics • Expert testimony
Cyber fraud risk assessment
• • Quantification of damages and claim
Cyber due diligence
• preparation
Threat intelligence
• • Rebuttal and defense of claims
• Cyber incidence response • Privileged consulting
• Incidence response preparedness • Document management (e-
• Evidence preservation and discovery)
retention
• Cybercrime investigations
The following is our general Fraud Taxonomy which is used to classify different types of fraud by perpetrator and vector.
Transaction Fraud
Conflicts of Interest - Inventory & Other Revenue Share & Vendor
Market Manipulation without Account Fraudulent Claims
Purchases Assets Royalty Service/Product
Takeover
Counterfeit
Loyalty & Incentive
Product/Intellectual
Program Abuses
Property Theft
PwC | Strictly private and confidential 120
The maturity scale framework in assessing the anti-fraud strategy
120
Assessment of the appetite in using analytics in their prevention and
detection program of the anti-fraud strategy
The evolution journey of fraud analytics could change how the company will harness new information sources to make more
effective and efficient decisions in fraud prevention.
For Illustration only
Prescriptive analytics
What if something
else happened?
Structured Data and Operational Decisions Unstructured Data and Strategic Decisions
25 September 2020
Increasing sophistication of data & analytics 121
Budi Santoso SE, Ak, MForAccy, PGCS, CA, CFE, CPA (Aust.)
Director Risk Consulting & Financial Crime Territory Leader
Email: [email protected]
Tel: +62 21 50992901
Mobile: +62 813 9915 4114
WhatsApp: +6590603089
pwc.com
This document has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in the document without
obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this document, and, to the extent permitted by
law, PwC Indonesia, its members, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information
contained in this document or for any decision based on it.
The documents, or information obtained from PwC, must not be made available or copied, in whole or in part, to any other persons/parties without our prior written permission which we may, at our discretion,
grant, withhold or grant subject to conditions (including conditions as to legal responsibility or absence thereof).
©2020 PT PricewaterhouseCoopers Consulting Indonesia. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the Indonesia member firm, and may sometimes refer to the PwC network. Each member firm is a separate legal
entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.