This document outlines the four planes of analysis for understanding works of art: the basic semiotic plane, the iconic plane, the contextual plane, and the axiological or evaluative plane. It provides details on what each plane covers and how they build upon each other to interpret the meaning and value of a work of art.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100%(3)100% found this document useful (3 votes)
1K views19 pages
The Four Planes of Analysis
This document outlines the four planes of analysis for understanding works of art: the basic semiotic plane, the iconic plane, the contextual plane, and the axiological or evaluative plane. It provides details on what each plane covers and how they build upon each other to interpret the meaning and value of a work of art.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 19
THE FOUR PLANES
OF ANALYSIS The Basic Semiotic Plane The Basic Semiotic Plane
Semiotics is the study of "signs“—here the work of
art is the iconic or pictorial sign. A sign consists of a "signifier" or its material/physical aspect and its "signified" or non-material aspect as concept and value. Related to these is the "referent" or object as it exists in the real world. The basic semiotic plane covers the elements and the general technical and physical aspects of the work with their semantic (meaning-conveying potential). It includes:
1. The visual elements and how they are used
2. The choice of medium and technique 3. The format of the work 4. Other physical properties and marks of the work The Iconic Plane or The Image Itself The Iconic Plane or The Image Itself
This has to do with the particular features, aspects, and
qualities of the image which are the signifiers. The image is regarded as an "iconic sign" which means, beyond its narrow associations with religious images in the Byzantine style, that it is a unique sign with a unique, particular and highly nuanced meaning, as different from a conventional sign such as a traffic or street sign which has a single literal meaning. The Iconic Plane includes: 1. The choice of the subject which may bear social and political implications ◦ We can ask the question: Is the subject meaningful in terms of the socio- cultural context, does it reflect or have a bearing on the values and ideologies arising in a particular place and time? 2. Positioning of the figure/s 3. Where the gaze is directed (in portraits) 4. Cropping of the figures 5. The relationship of the figures to one another 6. The style of the figuration Figuration Classical figuration basically follows the proportion of 7 1/2 to 8 heads to the entire figure in its pursuit of ideal form, all imperfections concealed. Realist figuration is based on the keen observation of people, nature, and society in the concern for truth of representation. Impressionist figuration is fluid and informal, often catching the subject unawares like a candid camera. Expressionist figuration follows emotional impulses and drives, thus often involving distortion that comes from strong emotion. The Contextual Plane The Contextual Plane
•Proceeds from the basic semiotic and iconic planes
and the knowledge and insights one has gained from these into the social and historical context of the work of art. •The viewer draws out the dialogic relationship of art and society. The Contextual Plane includes:
•A broad knowledge of history and the economic,
political and cultural conditions, past and present, of a society •The work of art may contain references and allusions, direct or indirect, to historical figures and events, as well as to religious, literary, and philosophical ideas and values which are part of the meaning of the work. The Contextual Plane includes:
•Different symbolic systems which are culture-bound
•These systems may have to do with color, shape, design, as well as cultural symbols associated with the belief systems of the different ethnic groups. The Contextual Plane
•The contextual plane likewise situates the work in the
personal and social circumstances of its production. •The work may contain allusions to personal or public events, conditions, stages, as well as influences, such as persons and literary texts, that have been particularly meaningful to the artist. The meaning of one work may become part of a larger body or work or of an integral artistic vision if analyzed through the semiotic, iconic, and contextual plane. The Axiological or Evaluative Plane The Axiological or Evaluative Plane • The axiological plane has to do with analyzing the values of a work. • The first consideration in evaluating would be to what degree the material basis of the work conveys meaning or particular intellectual/emotional contents. • Reckons with standards of excellence in the use of the medium and its related techniques. • Understanding and evaluating the technical side of the work requires a familiarity with and sensitivity to the properties of medium. The Axiological or Evaluative Plane
•The evaluation of a work necessarily includes the
analysis and examination of its axiological content constituted by values which become fully articulated on the contextual plane although these had already been shaping on the basic semiotic and iconic planes. The Axiological or Evaluative Plane • The artist is not or should not be a mere technician but expresses a view of life in his or her work. • The viewer/critic is also not a mere technical expert confined to the analysis of the elements, techniques, and processes alone. As also the artist should, places a value on the capacity of art to influence and transform society. • The mature viewer or critic is one who must have, after long expression and experience, arrived at the formulation of his own value system, his or her view of the world and humanity which he or she has come to feel deeply and strongly about. The Axiological or Evaluative Plane
•Art projects a horizon of meanings relative to both
the artist and the critic/viewer in terms of intellectual background, emotional maturity, and cultural range in the humanly enriching dialogic experience of art.