MITS5002 Software Engineering Methodologies: Final Assessment June 2020
MITS5002 Software Engineering Methodologies: Final Assessment June 2020
Final Assessment
June 2020
Final Assessment (Individual Work) - 50%. Time allowed 2 hours
The Final Assessment submission box will only be available for the time period window
beginning from when this document was made available for the length of time specified
above. This assessment must be completed and uploaded to the Final Assessment
submission box within this time period. The submission box will not remain open beyond
this time period. If you are late in downloading this document, you will not have the same
length of time to work on the assessment. The submission box will still close at the same
time for everyone.
The submission box will be linked to Turnitin, and similarity scores WILL BE CHECKED and
assessments indicating high similarity will be penalized as per all other assessments
throughout the semester.
The assessment must be submitted in a Word or PDF file, with your student ID, name, unit
code and unit name. You can submit this any time within the specified time frame (2 hours),
DO NOT leave this till the final minute as when the submission closes you won’t be able to
submit your work for marking.
If you have technical issues before the due time with submitting on LMS, email your
assessment to [email protected] but it must be time stamped on your email before the
due time. In the Email you must state the assessment name in Email Subject line, the Unit
Code: xxxx, SID: xxxx and Lecturer Name. Email submissions is via your VIT emails.
Place your answers below each question below within this file
2. Differentiate between design patterns and COTS, how design patterns facilitate to achieve
reusability in software design?
3. Explain whether software testing detects ‘the presence of errors’ or ‘the absence of errors’, and
why?
4. Discover ambiguities or omissions in the following statement of requirements for part of a ticket
issuing system:
“An automated ticket-issuing system sells rail tickets. Users select their destination and input a credit
card and a personal identification number. The rail ticket is issued, and their credit card account
charged. When the user presses the start button, a menu display of potential destinations is
activated, along with a message to the user to select a destination. Once a destination has been
selected, users are requested to input their credit card. Its validity is checked, and the user is then
requested to input a personal identifier. When the credit transaction has been validated, the ticket is
issued.”
5. Which software design methodology you would adapt for following software systems and why?
7. Why is it difficult to gain a clear understanding of what the customer needs? Explain in your words
how software specification helps to smooth the process of identifying customer requirements with
examples.
8. Consider a scenario where emergency or sudden changes are incorporated to software systems
prior to their approval in the requirements. Suggest and explain which model of a process could be
followed to ensure that the requirements and the system implementation phases avoid
inconsistency.
9. When both the availability and security are critical non-functional requirements, could a design
conflict arise whilst designing architecture? Explain a scenario to justify your answer.
10. You have decided to form a Software Quality Assurance (SQA) Group to deal with the current
situation of the banking system of NAB bank in Australia. Briefly discuss the role of SQA Group to
improve the situation of NAB bank in Australia.