Scribd
Upload
1K views3 pages

Evaluation For Paut ASME 8 DIV 2

The document evaluates a flaw according to ASME Section VIII criteria. It provides the results of evaluating Defect No. 1 which had dimensions of S=1, a=3, l=20, t=38. The defect was rejected because its a/t ratio of 0.079 exceeded the acceptance level in Table 7.10 according to the type of flaw being surface connected.

Uploaded by

Woodrow Fox
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1K views3 pages

Evaluation For Paut ASME 8 DIV 2

The document evaluates a flaw according to ASME Section VIII criteria. It provides the results of evaluating Defect No. 1 which had dimensions of S=1, a=3, l=20, t=38. The defect was rejected because its a/t ratio of 0.079 exceeded the acceptance level in Table 7.10 according to the type of flaw being surface connected.

Uploaded by

Woodrow Fox
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

EVALUATION FUNCTION FOR FLAW PAUT

We evaluation flaw in according with ASME Section VIII, Divison 2 Code-Table 7.10 & figure 7.11

Result
Defect No. S a l t a/l a/t ACC/REJ

1 1 3 20 38 0.1 0.079 REJ

FIGURE 7.11

* If S<= a, Surface Indication *If S>a, subsurface Indication


(May or may not surface connnected) (Never Connect to surface)
T
.10 & figure 7.11
TABLE 7.10

Thickness Between 25 mm and


Type of Defect less than or equal to 300 mm

Flaw
SURFACE Aspec Ratio SURFACE SUBSURFACE a/t ACC Level
a/l a/t a/t 0.036
0.00 0.031 0.034
0.05 0.033 0.038
0.10 0.036 0.043
0.15 0.041 0.054
0.20 0.047 0.066
0.25 0.055 0.078
0.30 0.064 0.09
0.35 0.074 0.13
0.40 0.083 0.116
0.45 0.085 0.129
0.50 0.087 0.143

You might also like