What Is A Needs Analysis
What Is A Needs Analysis
In this article, we will try to provide the answer, as well as walk you through the steps
to execute a winning needs analysis plan.
One of the biggest obstacles learning professionals are facing right now
is identifying the difference between training issues and performance issues.
For example, issues in performance or productivity are almost always addressed by
the training programs provided by the company or organization.
While standard training programs are designed to be helpful, they are not meant to
resolve all productivity or performance problems regardless of how good a
training program is. Training programs are not cookie-cutter solutions, that is why a
thorough needs analysis is necessary not only to identify what the problem is but
also the root cause of it and how to effectively address it.
Needs analysis and needs assessment are often used interchangeably, but instead
of being synonymous terminologies, they play different but related roles in the
process of identifying performance issues and/or opportunities and analyzing if
training is necessary to address them or not (Christensen, 2018). Christensen further
explains that needs assessment, needs analysis, and training needs analysis refer to
key steps in the process of determining “value-added solution” to a performance
problem. These steps, however, can be tricky when terms are “misunderstood and
used incorrectly” as the process offers a systematic approach, which involves a
proper transition between steps in order to achieve positive results.
Christensen (2016) also developed a concept map that reveals the roles of needs
assessment and analysis in the process of identifying problems and/or opportunities
begins by conducting a needs assessment, which employs needs analysis in the
process to identify skills or knowledge gaps. By conducting a needs assessment, an
organization will be able to figure out which performance problem or opportunity
needs training intervention and which does not. If there are issues that are
recommended for training intervention, the next step will be to conduct a training
needs analysis to figure out what type of training should be provided.
Additionally, the term “training needs analysis” refers to the process of gathering and
analyzing to determine the training needs an organization has to provide to its
employees (Reed & Vakola, 2006). Carlisle et al. (2011, p. 688) define training
needs analysis as a “methodological investigation and analysis into an organization’s
current and desired performance levels, focusing heavily on the ability of its staff and
their support networks.”
46%46%24%24%24%24%21%21%20%20%20%20%17%17%17%17%17%
17%14%14%Influencing and negotiatingHaving difficult conversationsDesign
thinkingLeading and managing changeCoachingProject managementCreating high-
performance teamsManaging timeManaging stressHandling
conflict05101520253035404550
Top 10 Skills That Employees Believe They Need to Develop
(Worldwide)
Designed by
Source: GP Strategies; Statista
Training needs assessment, which involves the process of needs analysis, can be
conducted anytime but is often implemented during the onboarding period,
performance reviews, promotion consideration, and when there are changes in the
organization that require employees to change job roles. It is, however, important to
conduct needs analysis periodically not only to determine the training needs of an
organization or its employees but also to assess the effectiveness of training
programs (SHRM, n.d.).
For HR professionals, conducting a needs assessment is made easier with the use
of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats—S.W.O.T.—analysis to help shed
light on the issues and bring to focus the areas that need to be examined more
closely. S.W.O.T. analysis is useful in performing a needs assessment in the areas
of compensation and employment benefits (Universal Class). In order to conduct an
effective training needs analysis, there are three important factors to consider
(Bleich, 2018):
There are three standard types of training needs analysis, which are following
(Bleich, 2018):
The tools vary and not every one of them is appropriate for every organization’s use.
The best way to choose which suits your organization best is by identifying your
company’s goal or reason behind conducting a needs analysis. Below are some of
the popular tools and/or methods (Bleich, 2018)):
According to Legault (2018), there are three steps involved in an effective needs
analysis but we can divide them further into four:
It is important to note that the main goal of needs analysis is to identify the
underlying issues that affect performance and provide the appropriate training as a
solution. Wilson (2020), however, states that training will not resolve a performance
or productivity issue if the root cause is not the gap in the employees’ knowledge and
skills.
An effective needs analysis also identifies the company’s role in the employees’
performance and productivity problems that are not training-related, such as
ineffective standard operating procedures (S.O.Ps.), usability of applications and
tools, outdated equipment, company policies, and others. While these issues may
not involve training, needs analysis helps bring them to light in order to help upper
management bridge and address the situation from their end.
References:
The ENA aims to support identification of the student's individual learning needs and
inform their Individual Education Plan (IEP)/Personalised Learning Plan (PLP). The
ENA is a process of understanding and addressing a student's social, emotional and cultural
learning needs, as well as their strengths.
Children and young people residing in statutory out-of-home care present with a
diverse range characteristics, needs, strengths and interests. They share the
experience of removal from their parents’ care as a result of significant concerns for
their safety and wellbeing, such as exposure to abuse and other traumatic events.
There is substantial research regarding the impact of abuse, trauma and disrupted
attachment on development, school engagement and achievement. Research
indicates that children and young people in out-of-home care experience poorer
educational and life outcomes compared to their peers who are not residing in out-of-
home care. They are also more likely to have Special Educational Needs (SEN).
Students in out-of-home care with SEN have poorer test scores and are less likely to
complete secondary education compared with students in out-of-home care without
SEN or students with SEN who are not residing in out-of-home care. Raising
educational attainment is an important strategy to interrupt these negative life
trajectories (O’Higgins, et al, 2017).
However, residing in out-of-home care does not have a causal relationship with poor
attainment; nor does it mean that every child in care will have worse outcomes than
their peers. A student’s individual characteristics, exposure to traumatic events and
other contextual factors that may have led to them entering out-of-home care, and
age and time of entry into care will all contribute to their individual presentation
(Welbourne & Leeson, 2012)[i]. In addition, protective factors, such as a safe and
supportive environment, school engagement, and positive connections with teachers
and peers significantly improves outcomes for students in out-of-home care.
An effective ENA is trauma-informed and takes a holistic view of the child or young
person across their physical, social, emotional, educational, and psychological
development.
The ENA is also informed by the linguistic and cultural background of the student,
and the student’s own views and readiness to participate in the process (where
appropriate).
The process considers the broader context in which the student lives and learns (eg.
school, home, residential care), the conditions and the people in the student’s life
and how these impact on the student’s development and progress.
The ENA should be strengths-based and constructive, rather than simply labelling
the difficulty.
It should also ensure existing progress can be maintained and support acceleration
when appropriate.
The ENA may include assessment processes such as observation and interviews
with key stakeholders, and collation of existing information, such as school-based
assessment (e.g. school reports, NAPLAN and On Demand test results) and
information provided by the DHHS/Community Service Organisation (CSO) case
manager. It may also include administration of standardised screening tools and
diagnostic tests in a range of areas of development, such as cognitive and
intellectual, achievement, language, adaptive functioning, social, emotional and
behavioural functioning, mental health, skills and interests, and vocational
assessment.
Standardised screening tools and diagnostic tests should not replace routine
assessment processes utilised by educational settings for all students. Schools are
able to provide data/information regarding attainment, wellbeing, and behaviour that
will form the basis of decisions regarding additional assessment and intervention.
Where direct consultation and assessment with the student is considered, the
student’s capacity to participate in the assessment should also be taken into account
(i.e. current emotional state). The best interests of the student, rather than pre-
determined timelines, should remain paramount in decision-making.
As the individual needs, strengths and prior interventions for students in out-of-home
care vary, the ENA and subsequent educational planning and support will be
different for each student, while retaining the overarching goal of positive educational
and life outcomes.
[i] Welbourne, P. & Leeson, C. (2012). The education of children in care: A research
review. Journal of Children’s Services, 7 (2), 128-143.