Case - Study - Professional Issues in Information Technology
Case - Study - Professional Issues in Information Technology
udy
Pr
ofessi
onal
Issuesi
nInf
ormat
ionTechnol
ogy
A.
Peterhasnowmov edtoJupiter
,oneofPar sley
’scompet it
ors.Si
ncethen,Parsl
ey’s
salesst affhav
enot icedthat
,insal
essituationswher etheyarecompetingdir
ectlywit
h
Jupiter,potent
ialcustomershavebeenaski ngt hem howt hei
rsoftwar
ehandlesf i
le
overflowconditions.Thesalesstaffhavetoadmi tt
ot heprobl
em.Asar esult
,theyhave
l
ostal argenumberofsal estoJupiter
.Parsleynowwi shestotakeact
ionagainstPeter
forbreachofconf i
denti
ali
ty.
1.CanPar
sleyt
akeact
iononPet
er?I
fso,
underwhi
chl
awcant
hisi
ssueber
aised?
Absolut
elyy es,Par
sleycan takeact i
on on Pet
erduet o heknowsa conf ident
ial
i
nformati
ont hatisf
orbiddentoclutt
eryethestil
lspreaditanduseditagai
nstthem.
Andthatissuecanber ai
sedunderthelawofR.A.10173theDataPri
vacyActof2012.
2.Whatshoul
dPar
sleypr
ovei
nor
dert
osucceedi
nthei
ract
ionagai
nstPet
er?
Parsl
eymustcol
l
ectst
rongev
idences,i
nthatwayt
hei
ract
ionsagai
nstPet
erwi
l
l
succeed.
3.Di
scussanypossi
blear
gument
sint
heci
tedpi
ecesofev
idence.
Aswhathav ement i
onedi nthestory,Par
sleyi
sav er
ysuccessf ulcompanybecauseof
i
tswi del
yusedsof t
wareev ent houghithasamaj orweakness,t hecompanyst il
l
managesi t
,inal i
ghtwei ghtsolut
ion.Ti
llPet
ermov edt oanot hercompany( Jupit
er)
whichisthecompetitorofhisprevi
ouscompanywor kedon.Si ncet hen,Par
sley
’ssal
es
si
tuati
onsaregetti
ngl ow&st af
fevenwonderwhycost umersaskedcer tai
nquesti
ons
ont hem how thei
rsof twarehandl esfi
leoverfl
ow whicht hest affmustansweri t
honestl
y.Asaresultthey’velostnumbersofsalestoJupiter
.So,t hisdidn’
thappenby
chance,
it’
sonpur
pose.Pet
erdi
dthi
sint
ent
ional
l
y.
B.
Tal
ybontGamesLtd.i
sasmal lgamedev
elopmentcompany,
employingabout20staf
f.
I
thasdevelopedaver
ysuccessful
gamethati
smar ket
edbythegamespublisher
MegaPasti
mesunderthet
rademarkBogl
ehunter
.(Bogl
eisaScott
ishwordforaghost.
)
BothTal
ybontGamesLt
d.andMegaPast
imeswi
sht
otakel
egal
act
ionagai
nstwhat
theyr
egar
daspiracy
.
1.Fr
om t
hescenar
io,
ident
if
ywhatact
ion/
scoul
dbet
akenundert
hel
aw.
Basedont hegi
venscenari
o,t
hattackl
esaboutpir
acythatcanbetakenundert
hel
aw
ofR.A.8293theInt
ell
ectualProper
tyCodeoft hePhili
ppines,R.
A.10173theDat
a
Pri
vacyActof2012andR.A.10175theCyber
cri
mePr ev
entionActof2012.
2.I
dent
if
yanddi
scusst
hel
egal
act
ionst
hatcoul
dbet
akenagai
nst
:
-Al
i
ce&Br
ian
Thelegalacti
onsthatcoul
dbet akenagainstAl i
ceandBrianistheR.A.10173t heDat a
Priv
acyActof2012andR. A.8293t heInt
el l
ectualPr
opert
yCodeoft hePhili
ppinesdue
tothefactthatt
heybot hhavewor kedpreviouslyonTaly
bontCompanyandt hennow,
theyarecur r
entl
ywor ki
ng int heBor thCompanyt hecompet i
toroft hei
rpr evi
ous
company.Thegamet hattheynei t
herdev el
opednordesi gnedoni ssomewhatsi milar
tothegameTal ybontCompanyhas.Obv i
ousl ytheycl
utt
erconfi
dent i
ali
nformationand
alsocopi
edit.
-Bor
th
Thelegalacti
onthatcanbet akenagainstBort
hist heR. A.8293theIntel
lect
ual Property
Codeoft hePhili
ppines.Si
nceweal r
eadyknow t hatt heyar ethegreatcompet it
orof
Taly
bontCompanyand al so theyknew al r
eady ,theymusthav er ead i tint heir
appli
cat
ionresumet hatAli
ce&Br ianareprevi
ouswor ker sofTalybontCompany .Which
makest hem,theBorthCompanybei ngawar ealr
eadyt hatAl i
ce&Br i
an’soutputi squite
si
mi l
artotheTaly
bontCompanyy etsti
llt
heydidn’
tev enhesi tat
etorecti
fyAlice&Br i
an.
-Gol
denGames
Si
ncet hey
’ret
hepublisher&they’
vepubl
ishagame,acarboncopygame,agamet hat
i
ssimilarfr
om Taly
bontCompany ’
sBoglehunt
ergame.Ther
efor
etheLegalact
ionswil
l
betakenunderthelawofR.A.10175theCyber
cri
mePrevent
ionActof2012.