Re Notice To Explain
Re Notice To Explain
______________________________________________________________________________
Greetings!
In the NOTICE TO EXPLAIN you sent me on March 15, 2022, first, you asked me to
explain my absence on Monday, March 14, 2022. In the same notice, you also alleged that the
Business Development Manger tried to reach me and did not get a response from me.
I would also like to point out that on the same screenshot shown in Appendix A, there were
messages that Mr. Babiera later on deleted. Luckily enough, I was able to screenshot the same
messages right before Mr. Babiera deleted the them and the same could be proved with the
consistency of the time-stamp that could be found on both messages. Such screenshot is
attached herewith as shown in Appendix B.
In the same screenshot, as shown in Appendix B, it was clearly shown that I was asked
to tender my resignation by Mr. Babiera himself. Again, as seen in Appendix A, I did send my
formal resignation as suggested by Mr. Babiera, and informed him, in the same conversation,
that I did the same. Furthermore, I asked him for an acknowledgement of my resignation but
Mr. Babiera never communicated to me thereafter.
On the second allegation that I am in violation of the company code of conduct, first and
foremost, I would like to state that without me being furnished a formal copy of the documents
I have requested which would clearly show that I agreed to subject myself under the said
company code of conduct, I don’t see why it should be applied to me.
The specific act(s) mentioned and alleged against me in the Notice to Explain that was
sent to me was that I was engaged in either Moonlighting or Double Employment with another
company which is connected to the company. Again, this allegation is FALSE. No specific
evidence of either Moonlighting nor Double Employment was officially furnished to me in the
said notice. Furthermore, while there has been knowledge that I applied with another
company, there is nothing in the Labor Code that prohibits the same. Hence, such allegations
against me for committing either moonlighting and/or double employment could not be proven
nor shown and thus may only pass on as mere hearsay.
It was also alleged against me in the same notice that I was in violation of Article 297 of
the Labor code. Under the same Article, paragraph a, would not apply, because I did not
willfully disobey any act lawful order by my employer as alleged in the aforementioned notice.
Paragraph B, of the same article would not apply as well as shown in Appendix A, that I
informed my supervisor of my absence as well.
Again, I would like to reiterate that without clear showing that I, for a fact, did sign my
employment contract and agreed to the company code of conduct, as shown in Appendix D, I
could not be held violation of the same.
I would also like to take this opportunity to address a couple of pressing concerns of my
own.
Lastly, as shown in Appendix D, upon finding out that my resignation was declined, I
asked for the immediate release of my salary to which Ms. Calogcog also failed to reply unto. I
would also like to take this opportunity to ask the company to show cause why my salary is still
being withheld to this date because as far as I am concerned, there are no legal basis to do so,
granted that my resignation was already declined. I am also asking the same to again, rectify
such acts committed against me and either release my salary outright and/or accept my
immediate resignation.
I firmly believe that despite unfortunate turn of events, I was able to properly explain
myself as to why no disciplinary actions should be taken against me. Furthermore, this serves as
a formal request to the persons concerned to show cause and rectify the actions done against
me by either granting my request to be allowed to resign immediately and/or to immediately
release my salary which is unjustly being withheld.
Sincerely,
Alexandrius Arriola
Business Development Officer
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
APPENDIX D
APPENDIX E