University of Rizal System: Unit Ii - The Individual Module 2: Diversity in Organizations
University of Rizal System: Unit Ii - The Individual Module 2: Diversity in Organizations
Province of Rizal
Page 1 of 10
DIVERSITY
Levels of Diversity
Discrimination
BIOGRAPHICAL CHARACTERISTICS
Biographical characteristics are personal characteristics – such as age,
gender, race, and length of tenure – that are objective and easily obtained from
personal records. These characteristics are representative of surface-level diversity.
Diversity is a broad term, and the phrase workplace diversity can refer to any
characteristic that makes people different from one another. The following are some
important surface
level characteristics that differentiate members of the workforce.
1. Age
2. Sex
3. Race and Ethnicity
4. Disability
5. Tenure
6. Religion
7. Sexual orientation and Gender Identity
ABILITY
Previously, we have covered surface characteristics which unlikely, on their
own, directly relate to job performance. Now we turn to deep-level abilities that are
closely related to job performance. Of course, just because we are not all equal in
abilities does not imply that some individuals are inherently inferior. Everyone has
strengths and weaknesses that make him or her relatively superior or inferior to
others in performing certain tasks or activities. From management’s standpoint, the
issue is not whether people differ in terms of their abilities. They clearly do. The
issue is using the knowledge that people differ to increase the likelihood an
employee will perform his or her job well.
Ability is an individual’s capacity to perform the various tasks in a job. Overall
abilities are essentially made up of two sets of factors namely:
1. Intellectual abilities – the capacity to do mental activities such as thinking,
reasoning, and problem solving. General Mental Ability (GMA) is an overall
factor of intelligence, as suggested by the positive correlations among specific
intellectual ability dimensions.
DIVERSITY IN GROUPS
Major contemporary workplaces require extensive work in group settings.
When people work in groups, they need to establish a common way of looking at and
accomplishing the major tasks, and they need to communicate with one another
often. If they feel little sense of membership and cohesion in their groups, all these
group attributes are likely to suffer.
Does adversity help or hurt group performance? The answer is “yes”. In some
cases, diversity in traits can hurt team performance, whereas in others it can facilitate
it. Whether diverse or homogeneous teams are more effective depends on the
characteristic of interest. Demographic diversity (in gender, race, and ethnicity) does
not appear to either help or hurt team performance in general. On the other hand,
teams of individuals who are highly intelligent, conscientious, and interested in
working in team settings are more effective. Thus diversity on these variables is likely
to be a bad thing – it makes little sense to try to form teams that mix in members who
are lower in intelligence, conscientiousness, and uninterested in teamwork. In other
cases, differences can be a strength. Groups of individuals with different types of
expertise and education are more effective than homogeneous groups. Similarly, a
group made entirely of assertive people who want to be in charge, or a group whose
members all prefer to follow the lead of others, will be less effective than a group that
mixes leaders and followers.
Regardless of the composition of the group, differences can be leveraged to
achieve superior performance. The most important way is to emphasize the higher
level similarities among members. In other words, groups of diverse individuals will
be much more effective if leaders can show how members have a common interest
in the group’s success. Evidence also shows transformational leaders (who
emphasize higher-order goals and values in their leadership style) are more effective
in managing diverse teams.
Researchers also suggest that diversity experiences are more likely to lead to
positive adaptation for all parties if:
1. The diversity experience undermines stereotypical attitudes.
2. The perceiver is motivated and able to consider a new perspective on others. 3.
The perceiver engages in stereotype suppression and generative thought in
response to the diversity experience.
4. The positive experience of stereotype undermining is repeated frequently.
Diversity programs based on these principles are likely to be more effective than
traditional classroom learning. Organizational leaders should examine their workforce
to determine whether target groups have been underutilized. If groups of employees
are not proportionally represented in top management, managers should look for any
hidden barriers to advancement. They can often improve recruiting practices, make
selection systems more transparent, and provide training for those employees who
have had not adequate exposure to certain material in the past. The organization
should also clearly communicate its policies to employees so they can understand
how and why certain practices are followed. Communications should focus as much
as possible on qualifications and job performance; emphasizing certain groups as
needing more assistance could well backfire.
REFERENCE
SAQ 1
Directions: Identify the following.
1. Differences in easily perceived characteristics such as gender, race,
ethnicity, age, or disability, that do not necessarily reflect the ways people
think or feel but that may achieve certain stereotypes.
2. Differences in values, personality, and work preferences that become
progressively more important for determining similarity as people get to
know one another better.
3. Noting of a difference between things; often we refer to unfair discrimination,
which means making judgments about individuals based on stereotypes
regarding their demographic group.
4. Personal characteristics – such as age, gender, race, and length of tenure
– that are objective and easily obtained from personal records. These
characteristics are representative of surface-level diversity.
5. An individual’s capacity to perform the various tasks in a job.
6. The capacity to do mental activities – thinking, reasoning, and problem
solving.
7. An overall factor of intelligence, as suggested by the positive correlations
among specific intellectual ability dimensions.
8. The capacity to do tasks that demand stamina, dexterity, strength, and
similar characteristics.
9. The process and programs by which managers make everyone more aware
of and sensitive to the needs and differences of others.
SAQ 2
ASAQ 1
1. Surface-level diversity
2. Deep-level diversity
3. Discrimination
4. Biological characteristics
5. Ability
6. Intellectual abilities
7. General Mental Ability
8. Physical abilities
9. Diversity Management
ASAQ 2
1. Intellectual
2. Physical
3. Intellectual
4. Physical
5. Intellectual
6. Physical
7. Physical
8. Intellectual
9. Intellectual
10.Physical
ACTIVITY 1
Cite one example (your own) for each form of discrimination indicated below.
Your example should be scenario in the organization or workplace.
Form of Examples from Organizations
Discrimination
Discriminatory policies
or practices
Sexual harassment
Intimidation
Exclusion
Incivility
ACTIVITY 2
RUBRICS
Directions: Please refer to the RUBRICS as your guide in answering the activities.
CRITERIA EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR POOR