Introduction To Theory of Machines and Mechanisms
Introduction To Theory of Machines and Mechanisms
R OBOTICS
26
FIGURE 2.1
Four-bar linkage.
Bar 2Bar 12341Bar 3Ground 2BaseGround 1Revolutes
If a mechanism involves light forces and is run at slow speeds, it can some-times be
strictly treated as a kinematic device; that is, it can be analyzed kine-matically without
regard to forces. Machines (and mechanisms running at higherspeeds), on the other hand, must
be fi rst treated as mechanisms. A kinematicanalysis of their velocities and accelerations must
be done and then they mustbe treated as dynamic systems in which their static and
dynamic forces due toaccelerations are analyzed using the principles of kinetics. Most of
the applica-tions in robotics involve motions at lower speeds and low or moderate forces
areinvolved. So we will restrict our discussion only to the kinematics of mechanismsin
this chapter. However, there are certain instances where the study of the dy-namics
becomes very essential in robotics. A discussion of those instances isbeyond the scope of
this book
Four-bar Mechanism
In the range of planar mechanisms, the simplest group of lower pair mechanismsis four-
bar linkages. A four-bar linkage comprises four bar-shaped links and fourturning pairs as
shown in Figure 2.1
The link opposite the frame is called the coupler link, and the links,
which are hinged to the frame, are called side links. A link, which is
free to rotate through 360 degrees with respect to a second link, will
be said to revolve relative to the second link (not necessarily a
frame). If it is possible for all four bars to become simultaneously
a l i g n e d , s u c h a s t a t e i s c a l l e d a c h a n g e p o i n t . Some important concepts in
link mechanisms are:1.
Crank:
A side link, which revolves relative to the frame, is called a crank.2.
Rocker:
Any link that does not revolve is called a rocker.3.
Crank-rocker mechanism:
In a four-bar linkage, if the shorter side link revolves and the other one rocks (i.e.,
oscillates), it is called a crank-rockermechanism.4.
Double-crank mechanism:
In a four-bar linkage, if both of the side links revolve, it is called a double-crank
mechanism.5.
Double-rocker mechanism:
In a four-bar linkage, if both of the side links rock, it is called a double-rocker
mechanism. Before classifying four-bar linkages, we need to introduce some basic no-
menclature. In a four-bar linkage, we refer to the line segment between hinges on a given
link as a
bar
where:
s=length of the shortest bar
l=length of the longest bar
p, q=lengths of the intermediate bars
Grashof’s theorem
states that a four-bar mechanism has at least one re-volving link if
s+l <=p+q (2.1)and all three mobile links will rock if
s+l > p+q. (2.2)All four-bar mechanisms fall into one of the four categories listed in
Table2.1.From Table 2.1 we can see that for a mechanism to have a crank, the sum of the
length of its shortest and longest links must be less than or equal to the sum of the length
of the other two links. However, this condition is necessary but not sufficient. Mechanisms
satisfying this condition fall into the following three categories:
Type Synthesis
refers to the definition of a proper type of mechanism b e s t s u i t e d t o t h e
problem. It is a qualitative method and it requires some experience
and knowledge of the various types of mechanisms that exist and
which also may be feasible from a performance and manufacturing
stand-point. As an example, assume that the task is to design a
device to track the straight line motion of a part on a conveyor belt
and spray it with a chemical coating as it passes by. This has to be
done at high, constant speed, with good accuracy and repeatability,
and it must be reliable. Unless you have had the opportunity to see a
wide variety of mechanical equipment, you might not be aware that
this task could conceivably be achieved by any of the following
devices:
■A straight line linkage
■A cam and follower
■An air cylinder
■A hydraulic cylinder
■A robot
■A solenoid
Each of these solutions, while possible, may not be optimal or even practical. More
details need to be known about the problem to make that judgment. The straight-line
linkage may prove to be too large and to have undesirable accelerations; the cam and
follower will be expensive, though accurate and repeatable. The air cylinder is
inexpensive, but noisy and unreliable. The hydraulic cylinder is more expensive as is the
robot. The solenoid, while cheap, has high impact loads and high impact velocity. So,
you can see that the choice of the device type can have a large effect on the quality of
design. A poor design in the type synthesis stage can create insoluble problems later on.