Assignment 10
Assignment 10
ABSTRACT
The soft first story RC buildings proved to be vulnerable in Nepal during the 2015 Gorkha earthquake.
The RC buildings in Nepal are constructed with a weak frame, lack of ductile detailing, and brick
masonry infill. In the city area, due to the urbanization and lack of land area, the upper story is used as
brick masonry, and the first story is used for shopping and parking purpose. This research intended to
assess and compare the seismic vulnerabilities of RC buildings with soft story in Nepal namely, (i)
building constructed by following NBC 205:1994 i.e. Mandatory Rule of Thumb (MRT) with poor
detailing and modified later by adding story (NBC) and (ii) building constructed based on modified
MRT of 2010 recommended by DUDBC, with poor detailing and modified later by adding story
(NBC+). Seismic performance is evaluated by JBDPA guidelines of seismic evaluation, FEMA-356,
NBC 1994, nonlinear static pushover analysis and dynamic analysis by Gorkha Earthquake motion. The
results are discussed in terms of story shear, capacity curve, maximum roof displacement, inter story
drift and damage pattern. Retrofit by wing wall and shear wall is purposed. The research found that
seismic behavior, ductility demand, inter-story drift pattern, of RC building with the soft first story are
different from those with analysis of bare frame. The soft first story suffered extreme inter story drift
change causing severe damage. Seismic vulnerability of both building before and after retrofit showed
NBC+ building performed better than NBC building. Both model buildings sustain Gorkha earthquake
motion which reveals the building collapsed during earthquake are of low concrete strength, poor
detailing, lack of reinforcement constructed before application of NBC. A combination of RC shear wall
and wing wall proved to be effective to eliminate stiffness difference and control excessive inelastic
lateral drift keeping the usability of open space in the first story.
Keywords: Soft-first story, Seismic Performance, Retrofit, Wing wall, Shear wall.
1. INTRODUCTION
Reinforced Concrete (RC) building construction has begun from the late 1970s and increased rapidly in
the last 3-4 decades in Urban areas of Nepal. The increasing population and scarcity of land have
compelled people to construct non-engineered multistory buildings with open space on the first floor for
shopping and parking purposes. As infill material is commonly used for the upper story of brick masonry
structure, lateral stiffness differences occur between the upper and the first story. Soft story building
proved to be very vulnerable and performed poor during 2015 Nepal Earthquake.
Most of the buildings are of owner-driven poorly constructed with inferior masonry quality
in light reinforced frames lacking ductile detailing. However, to improve the quality of construction and
Department of Urban Development and Building Construction (DUDBC), Kathmandu, Nepal.
2
International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering (IISEE), Building Research Institute (BRI).
3
National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS).
*
Chief Examiner, ** Examiner
1
enhance the seismic behaviour of buildings, Nepal Building code (NBC) was implemented from 2003.
NBC contains mandatory Rules of Thumb (MRT) that provides the facility for ready-to-use in terms of
dimensions and details for structural and non-structural elements for up to three-storey RC, framed,
ordinary residential buildings commonly built by owner-builders in Nepal (NBC). Later in 2010, the
Department of Urban Development and Building Construction (DUDBC) published an additional
recommendation for the construction of Earthquake Safer Buildings in Nepal with the assistance of
UNDP (NBC 1994). It is an improved version of MRT in NBC 2003 which specifies the increased
minimum size of columns, including the rebar detailing for the three-story building. Hence, people
constructed buildings following both MRT of 2003 and 2010 additional recommendation to some extent.
However, with urbanisation and increase in the land price, owners tended to add the other story to their
existing buildings, which were not initially designed for this condition. This tendency makes the building
more vulnerable.
Since Nepal lies in the subduction region of the Eurasian plate and Indian plate, it poses a
high risk of an earthquake. During earthquake force, inadequate lateral strength in the first floor of the
soft-story building to withstand massive displacement of the building may cause extensive damage or
even collapse. Moreover, it is estimated that more than 90% of the buildings, designed and constructed
according to old standards, are non-engineered RC frame and owner-built, posing a high risk to life and
property. Those structures constructed and modified without considering soft-story effects are under
threat of severe damage or collapse during a future earthquake. In this context, understanding the seismic
behaviour of the prevalent soft-first story buildings constructed in Nepal and the employment of the
strengthening mechanism has become a subject of paramount importance.
The prototype 5-story RC building with the soft first story is intended to represent a typical residence
with commercial RC building in the urban area of Nepal. The global dimensions of the sample building,
story height, number of story's and bays, including span length, concrete quality and steel type typically
represent the existing scenario. In this study, the two variations of the typical soft first story moment
resistant frame (MRF) with infill masonry are considered. The first type corresponds to a typical 5-story
residential cum commercial building with soft first story constructed somehow following MRT, i.e.
NBC-205:1994 (called as NBC building) with later adding another story, which makes buildings more
vulnerable. Similarly, the second type is also a 5-story building with a soft first story based on a modified
version of MRT after recommendation by DUDBC at 2010 (called as NBC+) and modified later by
adding stories.
JBDPA guidelines of seismic evaluation is done to clarify the possessed performance of
typical soft first-story buildings in Nepal. Nonlinear static pushover analysis is done to understand the
structure's capacity by the capacity spectrum method. After evaluating the seismic vulnerability of 5-
story buildings with a soft first-story, anti-seismic measures with RC wing wall and the shear wall is
proposed and reevaluated to conduct the structure's safety. Nonlinear Time history analysis (NTHA) is
performed using the ground motion of Gorkha Earthquake 2015, Nepal to understand the vulnerability
of building before and after the earthquake.
Seismic demand index (Iso) is the level of seismic capacity needed for a structure to remain
safe against a ground motion or code defined ground motion. For this study, Iso value is taken as 0.6,
which is calculated from the design horizontal seismic force coefficient of NBC 105:1994 for the
building with importance factor 1.5 to be used even after the earthquake. The building is supposed to be
located in zone 1 and medium soil and performance factor of 4 without following ductile detailing.
Moreover, for load combination considering earthquake, 25% is increased. Hence the total value
becomes the product of basic seismic coefficient in code, i.e. 0.08, importance factor, zone factor and
structural performance factor. Demand spectrum is prepared to find the performance point based on the
capacity spectrum method.
2
JBDPA standard for seismic evaluation considers only RC wall. So, for brick masonry infill
wall, shear strength of infill panel is taken as 0.2 Mpa from the proposed value from Seki et al. Similarly,
for ductility index the proposed value of 1.5 from the Al-Washali et al. is taken.
STERA 3D, the finite element modelling software is used for both nonlinear static and
dynamic analysis. Equivalent strut method is used to represent brick infill masonry in modelling. For
equivalent strut compressive strength (f’m) is taken from formula proposed by Paulay and Priestley in
1992. The modulus of elasticity of masonry prism is taken from the equation proposed by FEMA.
The prototype 5-story RC building with the soft first story is intended to represent a typical residential
cum commercial RC building in the urban area of Nepal. It has three-span in both transverse and
longitudinal direction. The story height is 2.84 m. The global dimensions of the sample building, story
height, number of story's and bays, including span length, concrete quality and steel type typically
represent the existing scenario. The buildings have open first floor used for shops and parking areas and
brick infill masonry in the upper floor having a thickness of 115 mm in partition and 230 mm in outer
side of building. The foundation is isolated footing.
In this study, the two variations of the typical soft first story moment resistant frame (MRF)
with infill masonry are considered. The first type corresponds to a conventional soft first story residential
cum commercial building construction somehow following the MRT, i.e. NBC-205:1994 (called as
NBC building) and later adding story making building more vulnerable. The second type is a 5-story
soft first story building based on a modified version of MRT after recommendation by DUDBC at 2010
(called as NBC+).
Figure 1. First floor plan. Figure 2. Front elevation. Figure 3. Side elevation.
Homogenous lateral displacement in every story in bare frame case is observed. Unlike this, in soft first
story case, large inelastic deformation is concentrated with subtle inter-story displacement in upper
story. The drift at soft first story exceeds the allowable drift limit (1%) as mentioned in NBC 105:1994
and immediate occupancy for FEMA. Thus, soft-story columns are very vulnerable to earthquakes if
they do not have adequate ductility and strength to meet the demand. Sudden change of story drift in the
soft first story enhances the possibility of forming non-uniform plastic hinge in soft first columns and
severe damage or even collapse during earthquakes. However, in the case of bare frames, uniform
change of the inter-story drift is observed. However, in the case of bare frames, uniform change of the
inter-story drift is observed as in Figures 4 and 5.
3
Figure 4. Inter story drift (NBC building). Figure 5. Inter story drift (NBC+ building).
4. RETROFIT
Many retrofitting mechanisms have been practiced to upgrade the strength and ductility of the vulnerable
buildings. Among them, column jacketing is widely used in Nepal in RC building. Whereas bracing,
insertion of RC shear walls, steel plate jacketing, structural slit, FRP wrapping and base isolation are
popular in other countries. Retrofitting strategies for soft first story is different from the conventional
retrofitting of RC buildings. The main goal of soft first story retrofitting is to eliminate the extreme
stiffness difference, control excessive story drifts beyond the elastic limit, and increase seismic
performance behaviour of structure up to the desired level.
4
The columns of the study
buildings are very slender, which
makes retrofitting even more
challenging. Using the column
jacketing, which is a popular one in
Nepal, would not eliminate the extreme
stiffness difference. Other retrofitting
like FRP jacketing, steel plate
jacketing, bracing, base isolation needs
high-level technicians and is expensive
too. Under such circumstances, the
wing wall retrofitting method is time
and cost-effective and does not hamper Figure 8. Plan and elevation of retrofitted NBC+ building.
the usage of the soft first story (Nakamura et al.). Moreover, it helps to eliminate stiffness difference,
control drift and helps to achieve the desired seismic performance of the building. Retrofitting with only
wing wall was not adequate to meet the strength demand, so the addition of shear wall in the proper
location was done.
Figure 10. Inter story drift (NBC+). Figure 11. Performance of retrofitted buildings.
In retrofitting of NBC+ building only first story need retrofit whereas NBC building first
second and third story in the longitudinal direction and first and second story in the transverse direction
need a retrofit. The retrofit by wing wall and shear is easy to apply, provides more inner spaces. The
building gives better performance after conducting nonlinear static and dynamic analysis and
recommended by this study. In Figure 8 the retrofitting plan for first story of NBC+ building is shown.
In Figure 9, seismic index before (original Is) and after retrofit (Final Is) are presented. Is after retrofit
are within allowable limit. Improvement in capacity of spectral acceleration of both NBC and NBC+
model building after retrofit is shown in Figure 11 which ensures the structural safety. The inter story
5
drift after retrofit of NBC+ building is presented in Figure 10 which ensures the within the range of
immediate occupancy of FEMA and drift limit of NBC 105.
The bare frame model of NBC and NBC+ building shows uniform story displacement. The soft first
story model of both NBC and NBC+ building after nonlinear static and dynamic evaluation, a sudden
increase in displacement in the soft first story is observed. This abrupt change of inter-story drift due to
stiffness difference is the leading causes of soft-story damage. NBC+ model building show better
performance than NBC model building in terms of roof displacement, inter-story drift and maximum
shear capacity. By retrofitting with a combination of shear wall and wing wall eliminates the stiffness
difference and control excessive without altering the occupancy use of the first floor. Both NBC and
NBC+ model building in this study survives with the moderate hinge in soft first story after time history
analysis of Gorkha earthquake 2015. The soft first story RC building collapsed during the 2015 Gorkha
earthquake were weak building constructed haphazardly adding multiple stories with low-strength
concrete in the structural members with inadequate longitudinal and shear reinforcement and poor
detailing.
Soil structure interaction is not incorporated in this research. It could be incorporated in
future research. Investigation of masonry unit can be done to find exact shear and ductility index of
brick masonry.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the supervisors Haruhiko SUWADA, and course
coordinator Tatsuya AZUHATA for their continuous support, valuable suggestion and instruction
during my study.
REFERENCES