Kishore Kumar R BBA Final Project
Kishore Kumar R BBA Final Project
MANALI
PROJECT REPORT
Bonafide Certificate
I, Mr. KISHORE KUMAR R declare that this project report entitled “A STUDY ON JOB
SATISFACTION AT SRF, MANALI ”. was carried out by me under the guidance of
Dr. K. RAO PRASANTH JYOTY Department of BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION and
is entirely my original work.
I would like to declare that this project is the result of my own effort and has
not been submitted to any other university for the award of any degree or
diploma courses.
INTRODUCTION
1 1.1 WHAT IS SAFETY
1.2 TYPES OF ACCIDENTS
1.3 NEED FOR SAFETY
1.4 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
1.5 AREA OF THE STUDY
1.6 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
1.7 CHAPTERIZATION OF THE STUDY
1.8 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
2 THEORETICAL OUTLOOK
(i) Personal Factors:
Employee Absenteeism
It is likely that a satisfied worker may miss work due to illness or
personal matters, while an unsatisfied worker is more likely to take
“mental health” days, i.e. days off not due to illness or personal
reasons.
When people are .satisfied with their job they may be more likely to
attend work even if they have a cold; however, if they are not satisfied
with their job, they will be more likely to call in sick even when they
are well enough, to work.
Helps to Earn Higher Revenues
No amount of training or motivation-
would help, unless and until individuals develop a feeling of
attachment and loyalty towards their organization. Employees waste
half of their time fighting with their counterparts or sorting out issues
with them.
Satisfied employees are the happy employees who willingly help their
fellow workers and cooperate with the organization even during
emergencies. For them, their organization comes first, everything else
later. They do not come to the office just for money but because they
feel for the organization and believe in its goals and objectives.
Instead of wasting their time in gossiping and waiting around they
believe in doing productive work eventually benefitting the
organization.
They take pride in representing their respective organizations and work
hard to ensure higher revenues for the organization.
Secondary Objective:-
Boost Productivity
Reduce turnover
Nurture Brand Ambassador
Work environment
conclusion
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ANNEXURE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
TYPES OF DATA:
Primary
secondary
Questionaire
interview
METHODS OF SAMPLING:
Non-Random sampling
Convenience sampling
Sample size: 50
Facet Description
PAY Satisfaction with pay and pay raises
PROMOTION Satisfaction with promotion
opportunities
SUPERVISION Satisfaction with the person’s
immediate supervisor
FRINGE BENEFITS Satisfaction with fringe benefits
CONTINGENT REWARDS Satisfaction with rewards given for
good performance
OPERATING CONDITIONS Satisfaction with rules and
procedures
COWORKERS Satisfaction with coworkers
NATURE OF WORK Satisfaction with the type of work
done
COMMUNICATION Satisfaction with communication
within the organization
20%
26%
9%
11%
23%
11%
INTRODUCTION
SRF PURPOSE:
• To be an inspired, caring organization
SRF VISION:
SRF MISSION:
• Enable customer satisfaction of a high level and a standard higher
than that of competition.
Employees details:
S.NO CATEGORY STRENGTH MAXIMUM PERSON
NO OF PRESENT
EMPLOYEES
AS PER A G B C
ROLL SHIFT SHIFT SHIFT SHIFT
1. OFFICERS 102 3 79 5 NIL
2. STAFF 171 22 94 20 17
3. WORK 527 119 79 106 85
ASSOCIATE
4. AREA LEADER 70 15 8 19 12
5. LEARNER 51 5 32 6 6
6. APPRENTICES 17 2 15 NIL NIL
LOCATION:
SRF LIMITED: MANALI Industrial area,
MANALI,
CHENNAI- 600068
TOTAL AREA:
140 ACRES [factory built in area 47 acres]
MILESTONES:
1970- incorporated as SHRI RAM FIBERS
1974- commenced operation of nylon tyre cord at MANALI
1977- production of fishnet twines started
1979- commenced production of nylon engineering plastics
1983- commissioning of belting fabrics at VIRALIMALAI
1986- set up SRF Finance LTD
1986-commissioning of coated fabrics at VIRALIMALAI
2004- Became the first tyre cord company outside japan to win the
prestigious Deming prize
2012- Wins the prestigious Deming prize for the chemical business
2014- Scaled up its HFC capacity with the commissioning of its second
HFC plant of 12,500 tpa capacity at dahej
PRODUCTION:
Nylon tyre cord fabric
Nylon industrial yarn
Nylon spin draw yarn;- 2450(MT/M)
Dipped industrial fabric (nylon):- 1100(MT/M)
Power generation:- 12.6(MW)
POLYMERISATION
SPINNING
DRAW TWISTING
TWISTING
WEAVING
DIPPING &
ENGINEERING PLASTICS
TECHNOLOGIES USED;-
Conventional technologies
Dipping- {company’s own dipping machine}
CHAPTER – 4
DATA ANALYSES
&
INFERENCES
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
Introduction:
Data analysis is a process of inspecting, cleansing, transforming,
and modelling data with the goal of discovering useful information, suggesting
conclusions, and supporting, decision- making. Data analysis has multiple facets
and approaches, encompassing diverse techniques under a variety of names,
indifferent business, science, and social science domains.
Data Interpretation is the process of critiquing and determining the significance
of important information, such as survey results, experimental findings,
observations or narrative reports. Interpreting data is an important critical
thinking skill that helps you comprehend text books, graphs and tables.
Researchers use a similar but more meticulous process to gather, analyze and
interpret data. Experimental scientists base their interpretations largely on
objective data and statistical calculations. Social scientists interpret the results of
written reports that are rich in descriptive detail but may be devoid of
mathematical calculations.
The data collected is collected in the field of Human Resource with special
reference to SRF – manali pvt. Ltd.
Primary data: Questionnaire method.
Sample size: 50
Statistical tool used: The collected data were analyzed using percentage analysis.
The method of reducing every item into a common base and comparing the
relative terms and the distribution of two or more series of data.
Interpretation :
• 8% of the respondents are below 25
• 24% of the respondents are in between 25-30
• 56% of the respondents are in between 30-35
• 12% of the employees are above 35.
• Majority of the respondents tend to age between 31-35
Interpretation:
• 78% of respondents are male
• 22% of respondents are Females
• Major Respondents are Males.
22%
Male
Female
78%
4.3 Work experience
Above 15 03 06
TOTAL 50
Interpretation:
Percentage
Below 5
5-10yrs
11-15yrs
Above 15
4.4 The Management helps financially with the employees providing
Loans and Benefits
Table:
Basis Number of respondents Percentage
Strongly agree 18 36%
Agree 9 18%
Neutral 14 28%
Disagree 7 14%
Strongly Disagree 2 4%
TOTAL 50 100%
Interpretation:
• 36% of the respondents Strongly agreed
• 18% of the respondents Agreed
• 28% of the Respondents were Neutral.
• 14% of the respondents were disagreed.
• 4% of the respondents Strongly disagreed
4.3 Chart:
Percentage
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
4.5 The management organization holiday tours and picnics
Table:
Interpretation:
No of the respondents
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree
4.6 The salary and incentives are as to Just
Interpretation:
• 40% of the respondents Strongly agreed.
• 30% of the respondents agreed
• 20% of the respondents were Neutral.
• 10% of the respondents disagree.
4.6 Chart
Percentage
Disagree
10%
Strongly Agree
Neutral 40%
20% Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Agree
30% Strongly Disagree
4.7 My Energy is not drained at work and can spend time at home
Interpretation:
• 30% of respondents Strongly agreed
• 40% of respondents Agreed
• 18% of the respondents were Neutral.
• 12% of the respondents Disagreed.
•
4.7 Chart
Percentage
Interpretation:
• 20% of the respondents Strongly agreed.
• 36% of the respondents Agreed.
• 24% of the respondents Neutral.
• 20% of the respondents Disagreed.
4.8 Chart
20% 20%
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
24% Strongly Disagree
36%
4.9 I can comfortably work with co-workers without any hindrances
from the management
Interpretation:
• 38% of the respondents Strongly agreed.
• 18% of the respondents Agreed.
• 11% of the respondents Neutral.
• 11% of the respondents Disagreed.
4.9 Chart
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
percentage
4.10 The work environment is friendly and maintains healthy
atmosphere
Interpretation :
• 14% of the respondents strongly Agreed.
• 26% of the respondents Agreed.
• 32% of the respondents were Neutral.
• 14% of the respondents Disagreed.
• 14% of the respondents strongly disagreed.
4.10 Chart
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
Interpretation:
• 30% of the respondents strongly agreed
• 36% of the respondents Agreed
• 12% of the respondents neutral
• 14% of the respondents disagreed
• 8% of the respondents strongly Disagreed.
4.11 Chart
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
4.12 Each employees are recognized by the manager and there are
healthy interaction between them
4.12 Chart
Percentage
4.13 Chart
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
4.14 I am satisfied with my work and does not feel pressured and
limited by the Manager
Interpretation:
• 44% of the respondents strongly agreed
• 36% of the respondents Agreed.
• 8% of the respondents were neutral
• 4% of the respondents disagreed.
4.14 Chart
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
36% of the respondents agreed to that they are treated well and their
opinions being respected.
36% of the respondents Agreed that they are satisfied with the Top
level management
44% of the respondents strongly agreed that they are satisfied with the
work and does not feel pressurized.
SUGGESTIONS
The company may go for ergonomically designed tools and machines provide to
employees.
The company may give stress bursting techniques to the employees to avert
industrial accident
The company should deal with employees who violate safety rules seriously
CONCLUSION
BIBLOGRAPHY
Books
1) Job Satisfaction: Application, Assessment, Causes, and Consequences – Paul spector
2)
https://srf.com/about-overview/
https://books.google.com/books/about/Job_Satisfaction
https://www.google.com https://www.wikipedia.com
The Job Satisfaction Survey, JSS is a 36 item, nine facet scale to assess
employee attitudes about the job and aspects of the job. Each facet is
assessed with four items, and a total score is computed from all items. A
summated rating scale format is used, with six choices per item ranging
from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree.” Items are written in both
directions, so about half must be reverse scored.