100% found this document useful (1 vote)
103 views26 pages

Enhanced Single-Loop Control Strategies

This document discusses several advanced control strategies including cascade control using multiple feedback loops, time delay compensation using models like the Smith predictor, selective/override control using multiple measurements and controllers, split-range control using two manipulated variables, inferential control when the controlled variable cannot be directly measured, and gain scheduling where the controller gains are adjusted based on the value of a scheduling variable.

Uploaded by

meseret sisay
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
103 views26 pages

Enhanced Single-Loop Control Strategies

This document discusses several advanced control strategies including cascade control using multiple feedback loops, time delay compensation using models like the Smith predictor, selective/override control using multiple measurements and controllers, split-range control using two manipulated variables, inferential control when the controlled variable cannot be directly measured, and gain scheduling where the controller gains are adjusted based on the value of a scheduling variable.

Uploaded by

meseret sisay
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 26

Enhanced Single-Loop Control Strategies

Chapter 16
Chapter 16
Chapter 16
Cascade Control (multi-loop)
• Distinguishing features:
1. Two FB controllers but only a single control valve (or
other -final control element).
2. Output signal of the "master" controller is the set-
Chapter 16

point for “slave" controller.


3. Two FB control loops are "nested" with the "slave"
(or "secondary") control loop inside the "master" (or
"primary") control loop.

• Terminology

slave vs. master


secondary vs. primary
inner vs. outer
Chapter 16

Y1 Gp1Gd 2
 (Eq.16-5)
D2 1  Gc 2GvGp 2Gm 2  Gc1Gc 2GvG p 2G p1Gm1
Chapter 16
Chapter 16
Time Delay Compensation
• Model-based feedback controller that improves
closed-loop performance when time delays are present
Chapter 16

• Effect of added time delay on PI controller performance


for a second order process (t1 = 3, t2 = 5) shown below
Chapter 16
Chapter 16

No model error: G  G*e s  G*e s


GC Y GC G
GC  

1  GC G* 1  e  s  Ysp 1  GC G
Y GC G*e  s GC G
  (16  22)
Ysp 1  GC G* 1  GC G *
(sensitive to model errors > +/- 20%)
Chapter 16
Direct Synthesis Approach (Smith Predictor)
Y GC GP
  Q( s)e s
Ysp 1  GC GP
Assume time delay between set-point change and controlled
Chapter 16

variable (same as process time delay,  ).

If G P  P(s)es
C
GC  R  1  1
then
1  C G P P  Pes
R
Q
1
From Block Diagram, GC 
1
 P  Pes
GC
Q
Equating... GC 
P(1  Q)
Chapter 16
SELECTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS (Overrides)
For every controlled variable, there must be at least one manipulated
variable.
In some applications
NC  N M
Chapter 16

# of controlled # of manipulated
variables variables

•Low selector:

•High selector:
Chapter 16

Figure 16.13 Control of a reactor hot spot temperature by using a high selector.

multiple measurements
one controller
one final control element
Chapter 16

Figure 16.15 A selective control system to handle a sand/water slurry.

Override using PI controllers - “old way” (vs. digital logic)

2 measurements, 2 controllers, 1 F.C.E.


Split Range Control
Chapter 16

2 Manipulated Vars.: 1 Controlled Var.:


V1 and V2 Reactor pressure

While V1 opens, V2 should close


Chapter 16

3
6
9
15
Chapter 16
Inferential Control

• Problem: Controlled variable cannot be measured or has


large sampling period.
Chapter 16

• Possible solutions:
1. Control a related variable (e.g., temperature instead
of composition).
2. Inferential control: Control is based on an estimate
of the controlled variable.
• The estimate is based on available measurements.
– Examples: empirical relation, Kalman filter
• Modern term: soft sensor
Chapter 16
Gain Scheduling
• Objective: Make the closed-loop system as linear as possible.
• Basic Idea: Adjust the controller gain based on current measurements of
a “scheduling variable”, e.g., u, y, or some other variable.
Chapter 16

• Note: Requires knowledge about how the process gain changes with this
measured variable.
Examples of Gain Scheduling
• Example 1. Once through boiler
The open-loop step response are shown in Fig. 16.18 for two
different feedwater flow rates.
Chapter 16

Fig. 16.18 Open-loop responses.

• Proposed control strategy: Vary controller setting with w, the


fraction of full-scale (100%) flow.
Kc  wKc , t I  t I / w, t D  t D / w, (16-30)
• Example 2. Titration curve for a strong acid-strong base
neutralization.
Chapter 16

Previous chapter Next chapter

You might also like