See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/278417404

Software Engineering Code of Ethics and Professional Practice

Article  in  Science and Engineering Ethics · April 2001

DOI: 10.1007/s11948-001-0044-4

CITATIONS READS

51 41,736

25 authors, including:

Donald Gotterbarn Keith Willam Miller

East Tennessee State University University of Missouri - St. Louis
176 PUBLICATIONS   1,404 CITATIONS    227 PUBLICATIONS   4,604 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Simon Rogerson Steven Barber

De Montfort University TIBCO
199 PUBLICATIONS   1,106 CITATIONS    3 PUBLICATIONS   65 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

StreamBase View project

ETHICOMP View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Keith Willam Miller on 04 July 2018.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Science and Engineering Ethics (2001) 7, 231-238

Software Engineering Code of Ethics

and Professional Practice
IEEE-CS/ACM Joint Task Force on Software Engineering Ethics and
Professional Practices*

Keywords: code of ethics, professional responsibility, software engineering

ABSTRACT: The Software Engineering Code of Ethics and Professional Practice,

intended as a standard for teaching and practicing software engineering, documents
the ethical and professional obligations of software engineers. The code should
instruct practitioners about the standards society expects them to meet, about what
their peers strive for, and about what to expect of one another. In addition, the code
should also inform the public about the responsibilities that are important to the
profession.
Adopted in 2000 by the IEEE Computer Society and the ACM—two leading
international computing societies—the code of ethics is intended as a guide for
members of the evolving software engineering profession. The code was developed by a
multinational task force with additional input from other professionals from industry,
government posts, military installations, and educational professions.

* About the Joint Task Force: This Code of Ethics was developed by the IEEE-CS/ACM Joint
Task Force on Software Engineering Ethics and Professional Practices. Members are Executive
Committee: Donald Gotterbarn (Chair), Keith Miller, Simon Rogerson. Members: Steve Barber, Peter
Barnes, Ilene Burnstein, Michael Davis, Amr El-Kadi, N. Ben Fairweather, Milton Fulghum, N.
Jayaram, Tom Jewett, Mark Kanko, Ernie Kallman, Duncan Langford, Joyce Currie Little, Ed
Mechler, Manuel J. Norman, Douglas Phillips, Peter Ron Prinzivalli, Patrick Sullivan, John Weckert,
Vivian Weil, S. Weisband, Laurie Honour Werth.

This Code may be republished without permission as long as it is not changed in any way and it
carries the copyright notice. Software Engineering Code of Ethics and Professional Practice,
copyright © 1999 by the Institue of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. and the Association for
Computing Machinery, Inc.
Republished in Science and Engineering Ethics (1353-2452)
Opragen Publications, POB 54, Guildford GU1 2YF, UK. http://www.opragen.co.uk

Science and Engineering Ethics, Volume 7, Issue 2, 2001 231

IEEE-CS/ACM Joint Task Force

SHORT VERSION: PREAMBLE

The short version of the code summarizes aspirations at a high level of abstraction. The
clauses that are included in the full version give examples and details of how these
aspirations change the way we act as software engineering professionals. Without the
aspirations, the details can become legalistic and tedious; without the details, the
aspirations can become high-sounding but empty; together, the aspirations and the
details form a cohesive code.
Software engineers shall commit themselves to making the analysis, specification,
design, development, testing, and maintenance of software a beneficial and respected
profession. In accordance with their commitment to the health, safety, and welfare of
the public, software engineers shall adhere to the following eight Principles:

1. Public. Software engineers shall act consistently with the public interest.
2. Client and employer. Software engineers shall act in a manner that is in the best
interests of their client and employer, consistent with the public interest.
3. Product. Software engineers shall ensure that their products and related
modifications meet the highest professional standards possible.
4. Judgment. Software engineers shall maintain integrity and independence in their
professional judgment.
5. Management. Software engineering managers and leaders shall subscribe to and
promote an ethical approach to the management of software development and
maintenance.
6. Profession. Software engineers shall advance the integrity and reputation of the
profession consistent with the public interest.
7. Colleagues. Software engineers shall be fair to and supportive of their colleagues.
8. Self. Software engineers shall participate in lifelong learning regarding the practice
of their profession and shall promote an ethical approach to the practice of the
profession.

FULL VERSION: PREAMBLE

Computers have a central and growing role in commerce, industry, government,

medicine, education, entertainment, and society at large. Software engineers are those
who contribute, by direct participation or by teaching, to the analysis, specification,
design, development, certification, maintenance, and testing of software systems.
Because of their roles in developing software systems, software engineers have
significant opportunities to do good or cause harm, to enable others to do good or cause
harm, or to influence others to do good or cause harm. To ensure, as much as possible,
that their efforts will be used for good, software engineers must commit themselves to
making software engineering a beneficial and respected profession. In accordance with
that commitment, software engineers shall adhere to the following Code of Ethics and
Professional Practice.
The Code contains eight Principles related to the behavior of and decisions made
by professional software engineers, including practitioners, educators, managers,
supervisors, and policy makers, as well as trainees and students of the profession. The

232 Science and Engineering Ethics, Volume 7, Issue 2, 2001

 Software Engineering Code of Ethics and Professional Practice

Principles identify the ethically responsible relationships in which individuals, groups,

and organizations participate and the primary obligations within these relationships.
The Clauses of each Principle are illustrations of some of the obligations included in
these relationships. These obligations are founded in the software engineer’s humanity,
in special care owed to people affected by the work of software engineers, and in the
unique elements of the practice of software engineering. The Code prescribes these as
obligations of anyone claiming to be or aspiring to be a software engineer.
It is not intended that the individual parts of the Code be used in isolation to justify
errors of omission or commission. The list of Principles and Clauses is not exhaustive.
The Clauses should not be read as separating the acceptable from the unacceptable in
professional conduct in all practical situations. The Code is not a simple ethical
algorithm that generates ethical decisions. In some situations, standards may be in
tension with each other or with standards from other sources. These situations require
the software engineer to use ethical judgment to act in a manner that is most consistent
with the spirit of the Code of Ethics and Professional Practice, given the circumstances.
Ethical tensions can best be addressed by thoughtful consideration of fundamental
principles, rather than blind reliance on detailed regulations. These Principles should
influence software engineers to consider broadly who is affected by their work; to
examine if they and their colleagues are treating other human beings with due respect;
to consider how the public, if reasonably well informed, would view their decisions; to
analyze how the least empowered will be affected by their decisions; and to consider
whether their acts would be judged worthy of the ideal professional working as a
software engineer. In all these judgments concern for the health, safety and welfare of
the public is primary; that is, the “Public Interest” is central to this Code.
The dynamic and demanding context of software engineering requires a code that
is adaptable and relevant to new situations as they occur. However, even in this
generality, the Code provides support for software engineers and managers of software
engineers who need to take positive action in a specific case by documenting the
ethical stance of the profession. The Code provides an ethical foundation to which
individuals within teams and the team as a whole can appeal. The Code helps to define
those actions that are ethically improper to request of a software engineer or teams of
software engineers.
The Code is not simply for adjudicating the nature of questionable acts; it also has
an important educational function. As this Code expresses the consensus of the
profession on ethical issues, it is a means to educate both the public and aspiring
professionals about the ethical obligations of all software engineers.

PRINCIPLES

Principle 1: Public
Software engineers shall act consistently with the public interest. In particular, software
engineers shall, as appropriate:

1.01. Accept full responsibility for their own work.

1.02. Moderate the interests of the software engineer, the employer, the client, and
the users with the public good.

Science and Engineering Ethics, Volume 7, Issue 2, 2001 233

IEEE-CS/ACM Joint Task Force

1.03. Approve software only if they have a well-founded belief that it is safe, meets
specifications, passes appropriate tests, and does not diminish quality of life,
diminish privacy, or harm the environment. The ultimate effect of the work
should be to the public good.
1.04. Disclose to appropriate persons or authorities any actual or potential danger to
the user, the public, or the environment, that they reasonably believe to be
associated with software or related documents.
1.05. Cooperate in efforts to address matters of grave public concern caused by
software, its installation, maintenance, support, or documentation.
1.06. Be fair and avoid deception in all statements, particularly public ones,
concerning software or related documents, methods, and tools.
1.07. Consider issues of physical disabilities, allocation of resources, economic
disadvantage, and other factors that can diminish access to the benefits of
software.
1.08. Be encouraged to volunteer professional skills to good causes and to
contribute to public education concerning the discipline.

Principle 2: Client and employer

Software engineers shall act in a manner that is in the best interests of their client and
employer, consistent with the public interest. In particular, software engineers shall, as
appropriate:

2.01. Provide service in their areas of competence, being honest and forthright about
any limitations of their experience and education.
2.02. Not knowingly use software that is obtained or retained either illegally or
unethically.
2.03. Use the property of a client or employer only in ways properly authorized, and
with the client’s or employer’s knowledge and consent.
2.04. Ensure that any document upon which they rely has been approved, when
required, by someone authorized to approve it.
2.05. Keep private any confidential information gained in their professional work,
where such confidentiality is consistent with the public interest and consistent
with the law.
2.06. Identify, document, collect evidence, and report to the client or the employer
promptly if, in their opinion, a project is likely to fail, to prove too expensive,
to violate intellectual property law, or otherwise to be problematic.
2.07. Identify, document, and report significant issues of social concern, of which
they are aware, in software or related documents, to the employer or the client.
2.08. Accept no outside work detrimental to the work they perform for their primary
employer.
2.09. Promote no interest adverse to their employer or client, unless a higher ethical
concern is being compromised; in that case, inform the employer or another
appropriate authority of the ethical concern.

234 Science and Engineering Ethics, Volume 7, Issue 2, 2001

 Software Engineering Code of Ethics and Professional Practice

Principle 3: Product
Software engineers shall ensure that their products and related modifications meet the
highest professional standards possible. In particular, software engineers shall, as
appropriate:

3.01. Strive for high quality, acceptable cost, and a reasonable schedule, ensuring
significant tradeoffs are clear to and accepted by the employer and the client,
and are available for consideration by the user and the public.
3.02. Ensure proper and achievable goals and objectives for any project on which
they work or propose.
3.03. Identify, define, and address ethical, economic, cultural, legal, and
environmental issues related to work projects.
3.04. Ensure that they are qualified for any project on which they work or propose to
work, by an appropriate combination of education, training, and experience.
3.05. Ensure that an appropriate method is used for any project on which they work
or propose to work.
3.06. Work to follow professional standards, when available, that are most
appropriate for the task at hand, departing from these only when ethically or
technically justified.
3.07. Strive to fully understand the specifications for software on which they work.
3.08. Ensure that specifications for software on which they work have been well
documented, satisfy the user’s requirements, and have the appropriate
approvals.
3.09. Ensure realistic quantitative estimates of cost, scheduling, personnel, quality,
and outcomes on any project on which they work or propose to work and
provide an uncertainty assessment of these estimates.
3.10. Ensure adequate testing, debugging, and review of software and related
documents on which they work.
3.11. Ensure adequate documentation, including significant problems discovered
and solutions adopted, for any project on which they work.
3.12. Work to develop software and related documents that respect the privacy of
those who will be affected by that software.
3.13. Be careful to use only accurate data derived by ethical and lawful means, and
use it only in ways properly authorized.
3.14. Maintain the integrity of data, being sensitive to outdated or flawed
occurrences.
3.15 Treat all forms of software maintenance with the same professionalism as new
development.

Principle 4: Judgment
Software engineers shall maintain integrity and independence in their professional
judgment. In particular, software engineers shall, as appropriate:

4.01. Temper all technical judgments by the need to support and maintain human
values.
4.02 Only endorse documents either prepared under their supervision or within their
areas of competence and with which they are in agreement.

Science and Engineering Ethics, Volume 7, Issue 2, 2001 235

IEEE-CS/ACM Joint Task Force

4.02. Maintain professional objectivity with respect to any software or related

documents they are asked to evaluate.
4.03. Not engage in deceptive financial practices such as bribery, double billing, or
other improper financial practices.
4.04. Disclose to all concerned parties those conflicts of interest that cannot
reasonably be avoided or escaped.
4.05. Refuse to participate, as members or advisors, in a private, governmental, or
professional body concerned with software-related issues in which they, their
employers, or their clients have undisclosed potential conflicts of interest.

Principle 5: Management
Software engineering managers and leaders shall subscribe to and promote an ethical
approach to the management of software development and maintenance. In particular,
those managing or leading software engineers shall, as appropriate:

5.01 Ensure good management for any project on which they work, including
effective procedures for promotion of quality and reduction of risk.
5.02. Ensure that software engineers are informed of standards before being held to
them.
5.03. Ensure that software engineers know the employer’s policies and procedures
for protecting passwords, files, and information that is confidential to the
employer or confidential to others.
5.04. Assign work only after taking into account appropriate contributions of
education and experience tempered with a desire to further that education and
experience.
5.05. Ensure realistic quantitative estimates of cost, scheduling, personnel, quality,
and outcomes on any project on which they work or propose to work, and
provide an uncertainty assessment of these estimates.
5.06. Attract potential software engineers only by full and accurate description of
the conditions of employment.
5.07. Offer fair and just remuneration.
5.08. Not unjustly prevent someone from taking a position for which that person is
suitably qualified.
5.09. Ensure that there is a fair agreement concerning ownership of any software,
processes, research, writing, or other intellectual property to which a software
engineer has contributed.
5.10. Provide for due process in hearing charges of violation of an employer’s
policy or of this Code.
5.11. Not ask a software engineer to do anything inconsistent with this Code.
5.12. Not punish anyone for expressing ethical concerns about a project.

236 Science and Engineering Ethics, Volume 7, Issue 2, 2001

 Software Engineering Code of Ethics and Professional Practice

Principle 6: Profession
Software engineers shall advance the integrity and reputation of the profession
consistent with the public interest. In particular, software engineers shall, as
appropriate:

6.01. Help develop an organizational environment favorable to acting ethically.

6.02. Promote public knowledge of software engineering.
6.03. Extend software engineering knowledge by appropriate participation in
professional organizations, meetings, and publications.
6.04. Support, as members of a profession, other software engineers striving to
follow this Code.
6.05. Not promote their own interest at the expense of the profession, client, or
employer.
6.06. Obey all laws governing their work, unless, in exceptional circumstances, such
compliance is inconsistent with the public interest.
6.07. Be accurate in stating the characteristics of software on which they work,
avoiding not only false claims but also claims that might reasonably be
supposed to be speculative, vacuous, deceptive, misleading, or doubtful.
6.08. Take responsibility for detecting, correcting, and reporting errors in software
and associated documents on which they work.
6.09. Ensure that clients, employers, and supervisors know of the software
engineer’s commitment to this Code of Ethics, and the subsequent
ramifications of such commitment.
6.10. Avoid associations with businesses and organizations which are in conflict
with this Code.
6.11. Recognize that violations of this Code are inconsistent with being a
professional software engineer.
6.12. Express concerns to the people involved when significant violations of this
Code are detected unless this is impossible, counterproductive, or dangerous.
6.13. Report significant violations of this Code to appropriate authorities when it is
clear that consultation with people involved in these significant violations is
impossible, counterproductive, or dangerous.

Principle 7: Colleagues
Software engineers shall be fair to and supportive of their colleagues. In particular,
software engineers shall, as appropriate:

7.01. Encourage colleagues to adhere to this Code.

7.02. Assist colleagues in professional development.
7.03. Credit fully the work of others and refrain from taking undue credit.
7.04. Review the work of others in an objective, candid, and properly-documented
way.
7.05. Give a fair hearing to the opinions, concerns, or complaints of a colleague.
7.06. Assist colleagues in being fully aware of current standard work practices
including policies and procedures for protecting passwords, files, and other
confidential information, and security measures in general.

Science and Engineering Ethics, Volume 7, Issue 2, 2001 237

 IEEE-CS/ACM Joint Task Force

7.07. Not unfairly intervene in the career of any colleague; however, concern for the
employer, the client, or public interest may compel software engineers, in
good faith, to question the competence of a colleague.
7.08. In situations outside of their own areas of competence, call upon the opinions
of other professionals who have competence in those areas.

Principle 8: Self
Software engineers shall participate in lifelong learning regarding the practice of their
profession and shall promote an ethical approach to the practice of the profession. In
particular, software engineers shall continually endeavor to:

8.01. Further their knowledge of developments in the analysis, specification, design,

development, maintenance, and testing of software and related documents,
together with the management of the development process.
8.02. Improve their ability to create safe, reliable, and useful quality software at
reasonable cost and within a reasonable time.
8.03. Improve their ability to produce accurate, informative, and well-written
documentation.
8.04. Improve their understanding of the software and related documents on which
they work and of the environment in which they will be used.
8.05. Improve their knowledge of relevant standards and the law governing the
software and related documents on which they work.
8.06 Improve their knowledge of this Code, its interpretation, and its application to
their work.
8.07 Not give unfair treatment to anyone because of any irrelevant prejudices.
8.08. Not influence others to undertake any action that involves a breach of this
Code.
8.09. Recognize that personal violations of this Code are inconsistent with being a
professional software engineer.

238 Science and Engineering Ethics, Volume 7, Issue 2, 2001

View publication stats