A Review On Gender Discrimination in Indian Education System
A Review On Gender Discrimination in Indian Education System
Abstract: Modern Indian education has been started following to the British education system after the fourth
decade of 18th century. Today schools are categorized according to the gender like, girls’ school, boys’ school, and
co-educational school. It is difficult to calculate the number of female administered schools. According to the
conventional concept, boys make noise than the girls in the class room. Teacher expects girls’ should always show
modesty unlike the boys’. So, uneasy behavior from girls’ is unacceptable. Seating arrangement of primary school
divided into two rows, one side is allotted for boys’ and the other side is for girls’. It creates a division among the
children without the awareness of gender. Opinion of educators and teachers make everything to select experiences
in curriculum. Due to the importance of theoretical concept, they don’t give any consideration regarding gender
problem. Teachers’ deep-rooted the concept of social difference regarding profession of men and women is
unknowingly to the girls’. This is hidden in the language of teaching. In school, boys’ and girls’ performed
different type of co-curricular activities. Sewing and other similar type of work is not allotted for boys’. It is clear
that teachers and the parents have to perform major roles together; they need to be more aware to remove the
discrimination in education system of our country.
Keywords: Gender discrimination, School management, Curriculum.
1. INTRODUCTION
Modern Indian education has been started following to the British education system after the fourth decade of 18 th
century. According to the Adams report, Paathshala, Madrasha etc were the main educational organization before the era
of British influenced Indian education system and girls were allowed to receive education from these institutions, but the
number of girls’ students was not large. His report also depicted about a school, named home school. These schools were
for those girls who were not allowed to go out from their house. Females of Tagore family use to be educated this way. In
the year of independence total literacy rate of India was eighteen percent where only nine percent was the literacy rate of
girls’. At that time only one child of every eight children and one girl child of every twenty children was enrolled in
school [2].
Today schools are categorized according to the gender like, girls’ school, boys’ school, and co-educational school. Briefly
most private educational institutions and some government high schools are co-educational. Most of these co-educational
government high schools are setup in village and there are no girls’ schools. Except these schools, all educational
institutions are either for girls’ or for boys’ students. Generally girls have limited opportunity to study high secondary
education.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Present study is based on the previous literatures which are sorted according to the year.
Kılavuz and Karaboğa (2021) found primary school education maintains gender discrimination and creates gendered
prejudices in the minds of students by the processes and practices of primary school.
Onyedikachi and Grace (2021) revealed gender stereotype influences student academic achievement. It should be
discouraged on senior secondary school students by the School Management Board and society.
Page | 1
Paper Publications
ISSN 2349-7831
Page | 2
Paper Publications
ISSN 2349-7831
Curriculum
Curriculum has two aspects; these are ethical aspect and subjective aspect. Specifically opinion of educators and teachers
make everything to select experiences in curriculum. Due to the importance of theoretical concept, they don’t give any
consideration regarding gender problem. As a result sufficient biasness is presents in every subject matter. Gender in
textbook is stereotypical. There women are reflected as weak, warm-hearted and caring person; they sacrificed their
happiness for the family [5]. Therefore experiences of workers on social, financial and family problem of women is more
important than the educational theory and analysis of psychology and sociology. It may solve the gender biasness of
curriculum.
Impact of gender on curriculum
In our education system gender inequality problem grows with time. Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, District Primary Education
Programme was launched to prevent this problem. As a result some positive changes take place but the main problem
remains. One Girl from every ten girls’ of the poor families of villages completes her primary education and one girl from
every one hundred girls’ reaches in high secondary education level [3]. It is also noticed that the educational quality till
the last class of dropout girls is not up to the mark. Even they forget their learning in small time span. In most of the cases
parents compel them to shun their education. Girls’ looses their honor from the attitude of teachers’, comments and
behavior of male friends. Quality of education in primary school is going downwards. Learning has become paralyzed
without private tuition. Therefore parents of girls’ don’t spend money for the private tuition. They think boys can earn
money for the future. Several studies find most the families allocate resources for education of boys than girls [4], [6],
[13]. These are the bare cause of negligence of girls’ in curriculum and learning.
Language
Teachers’ deep-rooted the concept of social difference regarding profession of men and women is unknowingly to the
girls’. This is hidden in the language of teaching. Such as, Doctor and farmer represents to the male gender. It is observed
language of teaching denotes boys than girls to present any content in classroom. Especially masculine nouns and
pronouns are used where gender of any context is unclear [1]. Most of the time, ‘a person’ word is used to present a
problem in arithmetic class. ‘Person’ word belongs to the common gender but it represents male gender in daily
conversation. If context of an arithmetic problem belongs to the male, then the word ‘person’ is specifying the male
gender. It is clear that not only language of a context, contextual meaning also signify gender discrimination.
Co-curricular activities
In school, boys’ and girls’ performed different type of co-curricular activities. That means sewing and other similar type
of work is not allotted for boys’ as co-curricular activities. If school selects this type of work for them then it will create
social objection and also boys’ will not accept this type of activities. In annual sports this segregation has also crept into
by allotting the different sport event. It is observed that text books also present gender discriminated images regarding
games. Boys perform outdoor games and girls play indoor activities like drawing [1]. Since childhood students get gender
discrimination in co-curricular activities.
3. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
Gender discrimination in behavior of teachers is also observed in classroom. Teachers give more attention either to the
boys or to the girls. Maximum time boys get more attention than the girls’. Teacher says, boys create disturbance, so they
need more attention. At the time of teaching sometimes teacher comments girls’ are talkative, they quarrelling every
time. These comments indicate gender discrimination. In this study researcher gave emphasis on school management,
curriculum and behavior of teachers but other component of education such as aim, attitude of family member and other
educational institutions (i.e. informal educational institution) are not analyzed.
However, it is concluded that gender discrimination exists in Indian education system, especially in school management,
curriculum and in behavior of teachers. Every stake holder like administrators, teachers and the parents must be aware
about their attitude and have to perform major roles together to remove the discrimination in education system of our
country.
Page | 3
Paper Publications
ISSN 2349-7831
REFERENCES
[1] Amruthraj, R. M. (2012). Gender discrimination in the primary school English language textbooks in Tamil
Nadu. The Primary Teacher, 37, 77-101.
[2] Balatchandirane, G. (2003). Gender Discrimination in Education and Economic Development: A Study of South
Korea, China and India.
[3] Chakraborty, P. K. (2021). Gender and Society. Kolkata, India: Rita Publication.
[4] Filmer, D. & Pritchett, L. (1999). Educational Enrollment and Attainment in India - Household, Wealth, Gender,
Village and State Effects. Journal of Educational Planning and Administration, 3(2).
[5] Jabeen, S., Chaudhary, A.Q., & Omar, S. (2014). Gender Discrimination in Curriculum: A Reflection from Punjab
Textbook Board. Bulletin of Education and Research, 36(1), 55-77
[6] Jejeebhoy, S. J. (1993). Family Size, Outcomes for Children, and Gender Disparities. Economic and Political
Weekly, 28(35), 1811-1821.
[7] Kılavuz, T., & Karaboğa, F. (2021). The Reproduction of Gender Discrimination and the Daily Practices of Primary
Schools in Turkey. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies (JCEPS), 19(2).
[8] Matope, N. (2012). Gender Discrimination in Educational Personnel: A Case Study of Gweru Urban District
Secondary Schools, Zimbabwe. Online Submission.
[9] Nakpodia, E. D., & James, U. (2012). Gender discrimination in Nigerian school system. International Journal of
Development and Management Review, 7(1).
[10] Onyedikachi & Grace, C. (2021). Influence of Gender Discrimination on Students’ Academic Achievement in
Senior Secondary Schools in Port Harcourt Metropolis.
[11] Sipe, S. R., Larson, L., Mckay, B. A., & Moss, J. (2016). Taking off the blinders: A comparative study of university
students’ changing perceptions of gender discrimination in the workplace from 2006 to 2013. Academy of
Management Learning & Education, 15(2), 232-249.
[12] SteelFisher, G. K., Findling, M. G., Bleich, S. N., Casey, L. S., Blendon, R. J., Benson, J. M., Sayde, J. M., &
Miller, C. (2019). Gender discrimination in the United States: Experiences of women. Health services research, 54,
1442-1453.
[13] Tilak, J.B.J. (1996). How Free is Free Primary Education in India? Economic and Political Weekly, 31(5), 275-282.
[14] Tuwor, T., & Sossou, M. A. (2008). Gender discrimination and education in West Africa: strategies for maintaining
girls in school. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(4), 363-379.
[15] Zimmermann, L. (2011). Remember when it rained: Gender discrimination in elementary school enrollment in
India. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Page | 4
Paper Publications