Engl 1301 Reflection Portfolio
Engl 1301 Reflection Portfolio
Reflection Portfolio
Essays can be a daunting assignment to complete. We sometimes believe that the first
essay should be perfect. This caused me to be extremely scared when I was writing my first
essay in Engl 1301. I was scared that although it was a first-year writing class, it was still a
University course. This terrified me because I was thinking that the professor was expecting
perfection even in the first essay. However, one of our first assignments was to read an article
called “Shitty first drafts.” This helped me to calm my nerves down and when I read this article it
helped me realize that first drafts do not have to be perfect. When it came to writing my first
essay I just wrote my thoughts without giving much thought to the actual structure of the essay. I
later went back and made corrections based on the feedback I received from my peers and
professor. I was told to do more analysis on the essay. When I wrote my first essay instead of
analyzing the genre, I was analyzing it rhetorically and this caused conflicts when writing my
essay. I remember that in my article for my first essay “Animal Cruelty: What You Can Do Right
Now to Prevent It” I saw a cover photo in the background of the title. Behind the title was a
picture of an animal who looked like they had human characteristics. The animal looked tired,
sad, and seemed to have been abused. I wrote about this picture stating how the author was using
this to gain empathy from the reader. I was later informed from my professor that this was not
helpful to the assignment. My professor said I could use the same concept about the animal but
not the way I used it. The way I used it was being rhetorically. I decided to remove this section
of my essay because I did no want to mix rhetorical analysis with genre analysis. Instead, I
focused more on the written genre part of the article. I looked deeply into the parts of the article
that were written and tried my best to analyze what the author was trying to communicate to the
reader. My first essay was about animal cruelty and I tried my best to not give my opinion on the
topic. Animal cruelty is something I am completely against, and while I was reading the article, I
completely agreed with the author however I did not want to only look at her article from my
perspective but also from a neutral perspective. I tried to see what the author’s stance on the
topic was and if she accomplished what she was trying to explain to the reader. I had a difficult
time in choosing a type of genre to write about. In class we had an activity where each group got
a poster and tried to analyze that genre. The one my group got was pretty easy to analyze. It was
about covid- 19 and although it did not have many writings on it we were able to speak about it
quite a lot. I tried to choose a poster as well to write about and analyze however this was difficult
because the posters would not have much to write about because there was not enough writings
on it. The task was to analyze a written genre and there was not much evidence I could find from
posters. This essay can help me in my future courses when I am reading books that are required
for the class and I can analyze the content. It will not help me completely, but it will help me to
structure my essays. This first essay gave me an insight as to how university professors want
their essays structured and what is expected. In the revision I did not have much to fix since I
received a good grade on my final essay. I did not change much of the content in fear of ruining
my perfect score. I still revised some of my topic sentences to make the structure more cohesive
For the second essay we had to compare the same genres. I chose to compare websites
from universities. I chose Texas A&M International University, University of Texas Health
Science Center in Houston, and University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio. I
compared these universities’ nursing programs. I researched each school and compared their
gpa’s, acceptance rate, and diversity standards. At the beginning of writing this essay I had a
difficulty narrowing down my topics. I tried to write about all three universities in a broad
spectrum and did not specify my thesis. When I spoke with my professor, she told me to narrow
down specifically what I was going to be writing about and not just write everything about each
university. I was also told that I needed to fix how I was comparing my communities. I would
write about one universities gpa, acceptance rate, and diversity standards and then I would
compare it to a university I had previously spoken about. I was informed that this might confuse
my audience. I decided to compare my communities a certain was. I wrote about each university
gpa, acceptance rate, and diversity standards and then I wrote about the other. I wrote about what
these topics meant and what they reveal about the university. This helped me in writing my essay
because it was not as confusing to the reader. In my last and final revision of the essay I fixed the
comparison of the essay and also tried to fix the thesis. In this new revision I tried to fix my
introduction and thesis statement more. I believe that they still needed more fixing to lead my
audience the right way. In changing these things I believe that I made the essay easier to read and
gave the reader a better understanding of what I am trying to talk about in the essay. Before these
revisions I think the audience might have had a hard time reading the essay and understanding
where the essay was leading and what I would talk about in it. The essay was also in a way
boring. Not everyone might want to read about nursing programs in universities. In this new
revision I tried to change the tone in the words I was using to make it friendlier to readers. That
was a challenge and a struggle I faced in writing this essay, I found it hard to make the essay
interesting for others to read so I would not loose the reader. I was also struggling with sentence
structure. One day in class the professor showed us a PowerPoint on how to organize our
paragraphs. This helped me in writing my essay. I wanted to include three topics for each
community, and I did not want the essay to look like it was jumping around. This day in class
helped me out a lot because I was able to understand how I could make my sentences flow from
topic to topic. In this next revision I fixed the transitions so the topics can transition from topic to
topic without loosing the reader. I had done that previously however I wanted to add transition
words to help the sentences transition smoothly. Although all of these new things I am being told
on how to structure my essay will help me in writing my future essays they might not help me
with other things in other courses. I will however be able to use this in comparing programs in
different schools if I choose to transfer schools. I will be able to look at these different websites
In my third essay I was told to analyze a genre rhetorically, I chose the same article I
used in my first essay. This allowed me to remember what my first thoughts was in reading the
article and what I believed that the author was trying to express to the reader. When I first wrote
the essay, I simply wrote down my thoughts and did not think much about the structure or
making sure the audience understood what I was talking about in each of the paragraphs. After
speaking with my professor, I made my essay a lot more narrowed down and fixed my topic
sentences. In one lesson the professor made on how to structure a topic sentence I was able to
read my paragraphs and create a topic sentence that gave my students an insight as to what I was
going to speak about in that paragraph. I was also told that in my topic sentence I should write
about what rhetorical device I was going to be talking about and giving examples. I did that in
the revisions and made those changes for the final essay. In the new revision I also changed my
thesis statement. As I read the article, I realized that the author had used different forms of
rhetorical devices. I first believed that the author only used pathos to install emotion on the
reader and this was basically all that I wrote about in the essay. I read it more and noticed how
the author was also trying to use ethos to gain credibility however they failed to do so because
they did not have any evidence to back up their statements. She did use some creditable sources
to confuse the reader into thinking her words were factual. I decided to use this in my revision so
I could give my audience a different perspective and for them to not think that the author only
used one type of rhetorical device the entire article. At the start of each paragraph, I also added
in the types of rhetorical devices that I was going to be writing about in that paragraph. This
helped my topic sentence be stronger and will help my reader to understand what that paragraph
will be about.
I believe that some of my weaknesses this semester was in the overall structure of the
essay. I have always had a hard time in writing my essays and in starting my essays. This
evolved over the course of this semester. I am now able to say that I have a good understanding
of sentence structure and how to form my topic sentences and introduction. The hardest part in
doing this website and the portfolio is trying to make the website easy for users to navigate
through it. I also had a difficult time in fixing my essays. I believe there is always room for
improvement but when I submitted my final essays I believed that was the best I could have done
and when I was told I had to revise basically the whole context I struggled greatly doing so.
Nevertheless, I focused on ways to make this essay even better and tried to fix it so much that
there were not any errors. Another struggle I faced was that in my first essay I received a perfect
score. I was afraid of changing anything and ruining the content of it and having it affect my
grade. My identity changed in writing these essays and especially revising them because I
realized that even when you think you have done the best you possibly can there is always room
for improvement.