Chapter IV
Chapter IV
______________________________________________________________________________
Objectives
_____________________________________________________________________________
1. To explain culture as one of the dimensionsof globalization
2. To analyze the relationship between culture and globalization
3. To explain the dynamics between local and global cultural production
____________________________________________________________________________
Globalization lies at the heart of modern culture; cultural practices lie at the heart of
globalization (Tomlonson, J. n.d.). As how Steger defines globalization, Tomlonson also agrees
that it refers to the rapidly and ever-densening network of interconnections and
interdependences that characterize modern social life.
The idea of connectivity could be taken to imply increasing global-spatial proximity: what
Marx in the Grundisse (1973a) talked of as the ‘annihilation of space by time’ and what David
Harvey (1989) has referred to as ‘time-space compression’. What is involved here is a sense of
shrinking of distances through the dramatic reduction in the time taken, either physically (for
instance, via air travel) or representationally (via the transmission of electronically mediated
information and images), to cross them. At another level of analysis connectivity shades into the
idea of spatial proximity, of a ‘shrinking world’ from Marshall McLuhan’s famous ‘global village’
to the United Nation’s recent coining of the term ‘Our Global Neighborhood’ to describe an
emerging world-political context.
3. Culture is ruled by a peculiar dialectic: the claims that its truths are self- evident,
even timeless, and yet culture constantly changes. These changes often take place
when it is confronted with outside influences. (Rozbicki and Ndege,
2012).globalization.
Outside Influences
• globalization
Being dynamic, culture can change in any one of four possible ways according
to Levinson and Malone:
It can:
Just like globalization, the term culture has various meanings. Theorists and
thinkers offer varying definitions and interpretations. From these interpretations, one can
adduce the features and characteristics of culture in the context of human development.
PROPONENT CULTURE…
Lawrence E. Harrison and Samuel P. • Look at the role of culture in human affairs
Huntington from cross-disciplinary perspectives:
economy, politics, rights and development.
C. Universal Civilization
The strong cultural presence in the economic and political affairs of the public led
scholars to conceptualize the idea of ‘single global civilization’.
UNIVERSAL CIVILIZATION
PROPONENT
Despite the idea of universal civilization, many still believe that a unified global
culture is still part of the future. Aigul emphasized that the future global culture will
perhaps require more unifying and powerful features that will fuse many different
cultures. Further, her contention finds support from Francis Fukuyama’s idea about
culture. According to Fukuyama (2006), ‘cultures are not static phenomena like the laws
of nature; they are human creations that undergo a continuous process of evolution’.
Since culture is dynamic, it will continue to evolve at in at least, two parallel ways
(Aigul, 2014):
REFERENCES:
Lule, Jack. (2016). The SAGE Handbook of Globalization: “Globalization and the Media:
Creating the Global Village”.
Aigul, Kulnazarova. (2016). The SAGE Handbook of Globalization: "Bridging Cultures:
Negotiating Difference”.
______________________________________________________________________________
Objectives
_____________________________________________________________________________
1. To explain the dynamics between local and global cultural production
2. To describe various forms of media
3. To analyze the connection of media with the development of globalization
____________________________________________________________________________
Globalization as claimed by many has been part of human civilization. This phenomenon
would not have occurred without the aid of a particular medium. It is in this idea that Jack Lule
argued that ‘globalization could not occur without media, that globalization and media act in
concert and cohort, and that the two have partnered throughout the whole of human history’.
Futher, Lule argued that globalization and media have created the conditions through which
many people can now imagine themselves as part of one world. It is this global imaginary that
brings to fruition what Marshal McLuhan called the ‘global village’ (McLuhan, 1962).
Unlike globalization, media do not seem hard to identify or define (Lule, 2016).
The word is plural for medium – a means of conveying something, such as a channel of
communication. Though the word is relatively modern, humans have used media of
communication from their first days on earth, and, we will argue, those media have been
essential to globalization.
oral
• Harold Innis
print
electronic
Speech has been with us for at least 200,000 years, script for less than 7,000 years,
print for less than 600 years, and digital technology for less than 50 years.
1. Oral Communication (Speech has been with humanf or at least 200,000 years)
oral medium – human speech – is the oldest and most enduring of all media. When
speech developed into language, Homo sapiens had developed a medium that would set
them apart from every other species and allow them to cover and conquer the world.
• Language led to markets, the trade of goods and services, and eventually into
cross-continental trade routes.
• Humans' first civilization was created at Sumer in the Middle East. Sumer is
thought to be the birthplace of the wheel, plow, irrigation, and writing – all
created by language.
2. Script (Script has been with men for less than 7,000 years)
The very first writing – allowed humans to communicate and share knowledge
and ideas over much larger spaces and across much longer times. Early writing systems
began to appear after 3000 BCE, with symbols carved into clay tablets to keep account of
trade. Script allowed for the written and permanent codification of economic, cultural,
religious, and political practice. These codes could then be spread out over large distances
and handed down through time.
3. Printing Press (print has been with humans for less than 600 years)
The printing press started the ‘information revolution’ and transformed markets,
businesses, nations, schools, churches, governments, armies, and more. Since
• Print encouraged the challenge of political and religious authority because of its
ability to circulate competing views.
4. Electronic Media
Samuel F. B. Morse began work on a machine in the 1830s that eventually could
send coded messages – dots and dashes – over electrical lines. By 1866, a transatlantic
cable was laid between the United States and Europe, and the telegraph became a truly
global medium (Carey, 1992: 157).
Communication breakthroughs
b. Cell phone. Invented in 1973. Relatively cheap to produce and buy, and easy
to learn and transport, cell phones have quickly become the world's dominant
communication device and penetrated even the world's most remote regions
and villages.
c. Radio. Introduced in the late 1890s. The technology was first conceived as a
‘wireless telegraph’. For much of the twentieth century, radio was the only
mass medium available in many remote villages.
d. Film. Silent motion pictures were shown as early as the 1870s. But as a mass
medium, film developed in the 1890s.
Digital media are most often electronic media that rely on digital codes – the long
arcane combinations of 0s and 1s that represent information. Many of our earlier media,
such as phones and televisions, can now be considered digital. The computer, though, is
the usual representation of digital media. The computer comes as the latest and, some
would argue, most significant medium to influence globalization.
It is through media that people came to know of the world. With media the globe
was linked not only with cables, broadband, and wireless networks, but also with stories,
images, myths, and metaphors (Lule, 2014). The stories, images, myths that were shared
through media made people imagine, think and act as one. It is through this process that
an imagined community (as introduced by Benedict Anderson) is formed. Thus, media
are helping to bring a fundamentally new imaginary, what scholar Manfred Steger (2008)
has called a rising global imaginary – the globe itself as imagined community.
Media are carriers of culture. As Jack Lule claims, the media produce and display
cultural products. They also generate numerous and ongoing interactions among
cultures. However, global interactions in terms of economics and politics are facilitated
by people. Therefore people are media (Lule, 2016). Since products carry the culture of
their state origin, and people market these products worldwide; people then are the direct
actors in commingling cultures.
Glocalization
The various connectivity that were established through globalization, the local
meets the global and the global was introduced in the local. To capture this encounter in
a single term, scholars conceptualized the concept of Glocalization. This term manifests
the increased interactions of cultures worldwide. Since culture is dynamic, local culture
itself is not static and fixed. Though outside influence may penetrate the national
boundaries of a culture through mass media, local culture may negotiate to such ‘other’
by adopting or adapting some part of it without compromising its distinct feature and
identify. Thus, the global takes local form. (Jack Lule, 2016). In and through media, from
music to video games to film to advertising and more, local people adapt global culture
to everyday life. From this, glocalization becomes evident in almost all nations.
REFERENCES:
Lule, Jack. (2016) The SAGE Handbook of Globalization: “Globalization and the Media:
Creating the Global Village”.
Aigul, Kulnazarova. (2016) The SAGE Handbook of Globalization: "Bridging Cultures:
Negotiating Difference”.
______________________________________________________________________________
Objectives
_____________________________________________________________________________
1. To explain how globalization affects religious practices and beliefs
2. To analyze the relationship between religion and global conflict and,
conversely, global peace.
____________________________________________________________________________
Religion
Just like globalization, religion is hard to define. However, several scholars offered
their own definitions of the term.
Emile Durkheim: a system around the sanctuary, that is, a system of beliefs,
practices and social behaviors that unites individuals in a moral
community
Secularization
Obadia (2010) argues that theorizing religion and globalization has been subject to
two different lines of interpretation: globalization of religion versus globalization and
religion (Roudometof, 2014).
The former focuses on the deterritorialization (Casanova, 2001; Martin, 2001; Roy,
2004) - that is, the appearance and, in some instances, the efflorescence of religious
traditions in places where these previously had been largely unknown or were at least in
a minority position of religion as it reaches nations beyond its territorial boundaries
(Roudometof, 2014). This happens as followers of a religious sect move from one country
to another and introduce the doctrines of their religion. This enables a particular religion
(especially its symbols) to conquer the global scene. On the other hand, the second line
emphasizes the influences of globalization to religion. Since religion is part of culture and
culture by nature is dynamic, religion tends to adopt to current trends brought by
globalization. As a consequence, religions reshape their institutional practices and
mentalities (Agadjanian and Roudometof, 2005). Although a religion can reject
globalizing trends and impulses, it is nevertheless shaped by them and is forced to
respond to new-found situations (Roudometof, 2014).
Thus, concomitant with the movements of peoples is the migration of faiths across
the globe. This resulted to transnational religion. Transnational religion is also viewed as
a means of describing solutions to new-found situations that people face as a result of
migration (Roudometof, 2014).
This comes as two quite distinct blends of religious universalism and local
particularism (Roudometof, 2014).
Hybridization is ‘the act, process, and outcome of multiple elements from diverse
backgrounds combining and interacting to create something new. Religions, identities,
peoples, social practices, cuisines, music, the arts, and styles of dress and speech can all
be hybridized through the meeting and intermingling of various cultural practices and
social products. Through hybridization, elements identifying a culture, practice, or
people become fused, combined, or melded with other social elements and
peoples’(Dietrich, 2007, 2012).
REFERENCES:
Roudometof, Victor Roudometof . (2016). The SAGE Handbook of Globalization: Religion and
Globalization”.