Chapter 13: Demand-Side and Supply-Side Policies
Chapter 13: Demand-Side and Supply-Side Policies
14.2:
● Tariffs
○ Or, customs duties
○ Tax on an imported good
○ Can be used to protect domestic producers or raise revenue for the government
○ Diagram: see notebook
○ Winners: domestic producers + domestic employment + government
○ Losers: domestic consumers + domestic income distribution + efficiency +
foreign producers + global allocation of resources
● Quotas
○ Legal limit on the quantity of a good that can be imported in a particular time
period
○ Implemented by issuing licenses with specific quantity limits - holders of licenses
are the only ones permitted to import
○ License holders receive “quota revenues” - they buy at world price and sell at the
higher, domestic price
○ Diagram: see notebook
○ Winners: domestic producers, domestic employment
○ No change: the government
○ Losers: domestic consumers, domestic income distribution, efficiency, global
allocation of resources
○ Winners/Losers: exporting country - loss of export revenue vs gain of quota
revenue
○ REAL WORLD FOCUS (US Sugar Quotas)
■ 40 countries are issued import licenses
■ Domestic price increases to double the world price
■ More efficient foreign producers are disadvantaged
■ 80% sugar consumption is produced locally and 20% is imported
■ Jobs are created in the sugar industry but are lost in industries that
depend on sugar - candy factories have relocated to Mexico because they
were not profitable in the US
■ Opportunity cost of sugar production + negative environmental impacts
● Production subsidies
○ Protect firms that compete with imports
○ Per-unit of output
○ Winners: Domestic producers + domestic employment
○ Neutral: Consumers
○ Losers: Government budget + taxpayers + efficiency + exporting countries +
global allocation of resources
● Export subsidies
○ Protect domestic firms that export
○ Per-unit for each unit that is exported
○ Winners: Producers + domestic employment
○ Losers: consumers + government budget + taxpayers + domestic income
distribution + efficiency + exporting countries + global allocation of resources
○ REAL WORLD FOCUS (WTO Success Story)
■ USA and EU have too much power in global trade
■ Export subsidies disproportionately affect farmers in developing, poorer
countries
■ Reduce market share of poor farmers in their own countries + create a
reliance on imports in developing countries
■ WTO banned export subsidies
■ Developing countries argue that they alone should be entitled to imposing
export subsidies
● Administrative barriers
○ Make red-tape checks time consuming and difficult
○ Packaging specifications
○ Technical standards
○ Health, safety and environmental conditions
○ Lengthy testing and inspections procedures
● FOR
○ Justified arguments (under certain circumstances)
■ Infant industry argument: New, small domestic industries cannot
compete with efficient foreign producers who cant take advantage of
economies of scale - difficult for governments to estimate the potentials of
industries + lack of incentive for protected industries to grow
■ National security: Industries such as defense should be protected so that a
country can produce them itself - US placed tariffs on an industry that
defense depends on: steel and aluminum (was that essential?)
■ Health, safety and environmental standards: necessary but sometimes
used as administrative barriers
■ Efforts of a developing country to diversify: LEDCs employ trade
protection on industries that they want to diversify into - their
governments might not know which industries are the right ones to
diversify into
○ Questionable arguments
■ Anti-dumping: Difficult to prove when actual dumping is taking place
(used as an excuse for unnecessary protection)
■ Unfair competition: same as above
■ Correcting balance of payments deficit: Exporting countries might
retaliate + more effective solutions exist
■ Government revenue: Used in developing countries, should be phased out
as they develop - important to not that tariffs impact income distribution
■ Protection of domestic jobs: Import restrictions on goods that are used to
produce other goods cause lower production and more unemployment +
import restrictions cause unemployment in exporting countries leading to
retaliation and thus, unemployment in the importing country
● AGAINST
○ Only domestic producers and workers always gain
○ Gain of producers is canceled out by higher costs of production and lower
efficiency
○ Customers almost always lose
○ Income distribution almost always loses
○ Foreign producers always lose
○ Resource allocation always worsens
○ Trade protection can negatively impact price level, real GDP and employment (in
the case of protection on industries that produce goods used to produce other
goods)
○ Trade protection can negatively impact a country’s export competitiveness (in the
case of protection on industries that produce goods used to produce exported
goods)
○ Trade protection may give rise to trade wards through retaliation
○ Trade protection created potential for corruption (bribes and smuggling)
● Monetary union
○ Common market + common currency and central bank
○ Example: EU - Euro + European Central Bank
○ Fixed exchange rate among participating currencies but never possible to change
the value of one currency in relation to another
● Functions of WTO
○ Administers trade agreements
○ Forum for trade negotiations
○ Handles trade disputes
○ Monitors national trade policies
○ Provides technical assistance and training for developing countries
○ Facilitates cooperation with other international organizations - World Bank and
IMF
● WTO criticisms and challenges
○ Accused of not favoring developing countries
○ Unable to reach agreements on agricultural protection and services
■ Developed countries insistent on protecting their farmers
■ WTO did manage to ban export subsidies
○ Inability to distinguish between developed and developing countries
■ Treats all countries as the same (except LEDCs)
○ Ignores environmental and labor issues
■ Supports agreements that favor countries with low environmental and
labor standards
■ Developed countries, with higher bargaining power, care less about these
issues
○ Fragmentation of global trade
■ Global trade and the WTO are stagnating
■ Impatience with WTO (favoring agreements outside of it)
■ Plurilateral (voluntary) agreements undermine WTO
○ Blocking of its power
■ US blocked the appointment of new judges to WTO appellate body
■ Without appellate body, WTO cannot resolve trade disputes
RLSs for P1