Scribd
Upload
2K views

School Committee Performance Evaluation Form

This document is a performance evaluation form for the Project PRAISE Committee at Kasiglahan Village Elementary School. It evaluates several aspects of a committee program including program management, attainment of objectives, activities, support materials, and venue/accommodation. Committee members were asked to rate elements as evident or not evident and provide remarks. The monitoring official, chairman, and members then sign off on the evaluation. The principal also notes the evaluation.

Uploaded by

Sonny Matias
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
2K views

School Committee Performance Evaluation Form

This document is a performance evaluation form for the Project PRAISE Committee at Kasiglahan Village Elementary School. It evaluates several aspects of a committee program including program management, attainment of objectives, activities, support materials, and venue/accommodation. Committee members were asked to rate elements as evident or not evident and provide remarks. The monitoring official, chairman, and members then sign off on the evaluation. The principal also notes the evaluation.

Uploaded by

Sonny Matias
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region IVA-CALABARZON
Division of Rizal
District of Rodriguez

Kasiglahan Village Elementary School


San Jose, Rodriguez, Rizal

COMMITTEE PERFORMNACE EVALUATION FORM


Project PRAISE COMMITTEE
Program/Committee: __________________________________________________
KVES Session Hall
Venue: ___________________________________ Date: ________________
After the conduct of the Committee Project, I believe that... Evident Not REMARKS
Evident
A. Program management
1. The program was delivered as planned
2. The program was managed efficiently
3. The program was well-structured
B. Attainment of Objectives
4. The program objectives were clearly presented
5. The program objectives were attained
C. Activities
6. Program activities were appropriate to attendees’
abilities
7. Program activities were based on curriculum standards
8. The activities were effective in generating learning
9. Age-appropriate learning methodologies were used
effectively
10. Management of activities was effectively structured
11. Participation of all concerned were encouraged
12. Participants demonstrated a clear manifestation of
expected performances.
D. Provision of Support Materials
13. The support materials provided were appropriate to
the participants’ needs
14. Support materials provided were adequate and were
given on time
E. Program Management Team
15. Program management Team members were courteous
16. Program Management Team was efficient
17. Program management Team was responsive to the
needs of the participants
F. Venue and Accommodation
18. The venue was well lighted
19. The venue was well –ventilated
20. The venue was comfortable with sufficient space for
program activities
21. The venue had sanitary and hygienic conditions with
adequate comfort rooms
22. Meals were nutritious and sufficient in quantity and No provision of meals.
quality
23. Meals were generally well-prepared and tasty No provision of meals.
24. The accommodation was comfortable with sanitary and
hygienic conditions

Monitoring Official

_________________________
Chairman

___________________ ______________________ ______________________


Member Member Member

Prepared by:

SONNY V. MATIAS
Master Teacher II

Noted:

____________________________
Principal IV

You might also like