Scribd
Upload
52 views

SC Order - 26-Mar-2021

The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition. While dismissing the petition, the Court directed the trial court to ensure that the trial of the petitioner, who has been in custody since September 2018, is concluded expeditiously. There are 53 total witnesses, with 51 remaining to be examined. The Court directed the prosecution and investigating officer to take steps to ensure the expeditious disposal of the trial. The Court also directed that a compliance report be submitted to the Court by the end of December 2021.

Uploaded by

c chandra
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
52 views

SC Order - 26-Mar-2021

The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition. While dismissing the petition, the Court directed the trial court to ensure that the trial of the petitioner, who has been in custody since September 2018, is concluded expeditiously. There are 53 total witnesses, with 51 remaining to be examined. The Court directed the prosecution and investigating officer to take steps to ensure the expeditious disposal of the trial. The Court also directed that a compliance report be submitted to the Court by the end of December 2021.

Uploaded by

c chandra
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

1

ITEM NO.25 Court 4 (Video Conferencing) SECTION II-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2584/2021

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-01-2021


in MCRC No. 49332/2020 passed by the High Court Of M.p At Indore)

SOLIS FERNANDEZ JORGE RENAN Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE


INDORE ZONAL UNIT, INDORE Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.42678/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING


C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.42677/2021-EXEMPTION FROM
FILING O.T. and IA No.42676/2021-PERMISSION TO PLACE ADDITIONAL
FACTS AND GROUNDS )

Date : 26-03-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI

For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Arjun Syal, Adv.
Ms. Mehaak Jaggi, Adv.
Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Adv.
Mr. Ayush Kaushik, Adv.
Mr. Angah Gautam, Adv.
Mr. Mithu Jain, AOR

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following


O R D E R

Signature Not Verified


We declined to interfere in this Special Leave
Digitally signed by
NEETU KHAJURIA

Petition.
Date: 2021.03.27
11:15:16 IST
Reason:
The Special Leave Petition is dismissed

accordingly.
2

However, we direct the Trial Court to ensure that the

trial is concluded expeditiously considering the fact

that the petitioner is in custody since 27.09.2018.

We are informed that there are in all 53 witnesses,

out of which 51 remained to be examined.

Accordingly, we direct the Prosecution and

Investigating Officer to take up all steps to ensure that

the trial is disposed of expeditiously.

Copy of this order be forwarded to the Investigating

Officer as well as Directorate of Revenue Intelligence,

Indore, Madhya Pradesh who must monitor the progress of

the trial and submit compliance report before end of

December, 2021.

Needless to observe that the trial be decided on its

own merits and in accordance with law uninfluenced by any

of the observations made by the High Court in the

impugned order.

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI)


COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

You might also like