Assignment 1 of 8606 of AIOU
Assignment 1 of 8606 of AIOU
Culture:
Culture refers to the cumulative deposit of knowledge, experience, beliefs, values,
attitudes, meanings, hierarchies, religion, notions of time, roles, spatial relations,
concepts of the universe, and material objects and possessions acquired by a group
of people in the course of generations through individual and group striving.
Culture is the systems of knowledge shared by a relatively large group of people.
Culture is communication, communication is culture.
Cultural Diversity:
Cultural diversity is about appreciating that society is made up of many different groups
with different interests, skills, talents and
needs. It also means that you recognise that people in society can have differing religious
beliefs and sexual orientations to you.
What is equality?
Equality is about people being treated fairly, equally and specifically to their needs. It’s
about inclusion regardless of race, gender, disability, religion or belief, sexual orientation
and age. It encourages an environment that allows people from different backgrounds to
reach their full potential.
Why does diversity matter?
A better understanding between different cultures, beliefs and life experiences can help
make our world more stable, peaceful place and can help us develop as a society.
What can you do to encourage yourself and other people to live better together?
Why not visit an art exhibition about other cultures or beliefs?
Watch a movie or read a book about another country or religion.
Invite a friend from a different country or religion round to share your traditions and
learn about theirs.
Explore music of another culture or country.
Learn about traditional celebrations from other cultures for example Hanukkah or
Ramadan or Qingming festival in China.
Visit a place of worship different than yours and participate in the celebration.
Speak with other people about prejudices and stereotypes and share your views of
life.
Volunteer and broaden your horizons.
The focus of this essay is on the role of culture on children’s social development.
Importantly, the form that behaviours take may appear identical across cultures. Yet, given
that cultures vary in their customs and beliefs, the same behaviour may be interpreted
differently across cultures.2 It is likely that any behaviour that is viewed, within a culture, as
adaptive will lead to its encouragement by significant others including parents and peers; in
contrast, if a behaviour is perceived to be maladaptive, it will be discouraged. Moreover, the
means by which the given behaviour is encouraged or discouraged may be culturally
determined and defined.
Most cross-cultural work on children’s social development has been dominated by an etic
framework, which assumes that the constructs measured have relevance across all
cultures.3 On the other hand, an emic framework refers to the specific ideas, behaviours,
and values that are viewed as meaningful by members of a particular culture. The etic
perspective may cause researchers to operationally define (and thus assess) constructs in
the same ways (with the same methods and measures) across cultures. Thus, the etic
approach may result in overlooking culturally-specific definitions of given constructs. For
example, researchers may assume that social competence, as a construct, is universally
relevant and that it can be measured by assessments created in, for example, North
American laboratories. This etic assumption may be entirely correct; however, one would
clearly need to empirically test this assumption. It is likely that, to some extent, the study of
social competence would require an emic belief requiring within-culture conceptualization
and measurement. Some aspects of competence may be universally held and others not.
Research Context
In addition to culture, other significant constructs need to be addressed. For example,
broadly, researchers typically discuss two cultural phenomena: 1) independent,
individualistic, or Western cultures, and 2) interdependent, collectivistic, or Eastern and
Southern (e.g., Central and South American) cultures. Western cultures are often described
as those for whom members value assertiveness, expressiveness and competitiveness;
whereas Eastern and Southern cultures are often described as those for whom members
value group harmony and cooperation. More recently, there has been agreement that most
countries are a fine mix of both of these constructs, with some being relatively more
individualistic and others relatively more collectivistic. Significantly, in the research area
reviewed herein, there is relatively little known of Southern cultures (or differences
between Northern and Southern cultures); thus, the review is focused mainly on
comparisons between Western and Eastern cultures.
Media influences on childhood development include movies, TV shows, video games, and
other online content. Research that the American Psychological Association (APA) has
shared shows that children’s exposure to violent media can result in aggressive behaviour;
exposure to advertising for non-nutritious foods can increase rates of childhood obesity; and
too much screen time can be linked to lower brain development in pre-schoolers.
A study from the Cognitive Impacts of Digital Media Workgroup found that children begin to
learn from TV programs at around 2.5 years old. Educational programs, such as “Sesame
Street,” can positively influence their knowledge and social skills, preparing them for school.
However, after they turn 6 years old, children begin to watch more entertainment
programming, which can, in turn, influence their behaviour negatively. In addition, while
video games can help children develop visual processing skills, they can also yield aggressive
behaviour. The effects on cognitive skills and behaviours are often specific to the games
played.
As a result of these findings, the study suggests that clinicians and early childhood service
providers should work with parents to limit TV exposure before children turn 2 years old. As
children begin to learn how to read, clinicians and service providers should advise parents to
regulate children’s media consumption — with a focus on providing educational media
content — and encourage reading habits.
The connection with cultural background is clear: Diverse cultures have different attitudes
toward TV and other entertainment media, as well as different abilities to afford access to
such media. A child from a collectivist culture, for example, may be encouraged to help
infant or elderly family members in lieu of watching educational TV after school. Indirectly,
culture influences these children’s ability to benefit from such experiences.
In addition, to take the example further, children whose culture discourages educational TV
and other media may be ridiculed by school peers for missing out on popular pastimes other
children engage in.
Another way that media in popular culture can influence child development is by depicting
and perpetuating cultural stereotypes. For example, a movie might show women or
minorities in a negative light, or not at all. A sitcom might feature only white characters,
never those of diverse races or ethnicities.
Clearly, the absence of role models in entertainment media, or the presence of negative
stereotypes, can affect children’s self-esteem. This can cause media to become a negative
cultural influence on a child’s development.
of both team situation and individual temperament. This section reviews a variety of models
often applied in workplaces that can help a team perform optimally and manage crises
effectively.
“win at all charges,” dominate and engage in power struggles. This can result in animosity,
but can also spur teammates to compete constructively, which can lead to interesting
innovations if well managed.
2. Accommodating: highly cooperative, but unassertive behaviour. This may seem like a
good way to avoid conflict, but it can also lead to self-silencing of good ideas in order to
3. Compromising: this approach is the most moderate in both scales, and while it might
Sometimes compromise is necessary, but often, the best solution comes from a single
inspirational source.
4. Avoiding: being unassertive and uncooperative is generally the least effective way to deal
with conflict, as this simply avoids the problem and neglects the need for a solution.
and focusing on what is good can be the best way to just get through it.
5. Collaborating: being highly assertive and cooperative is the best way to find solutions that
Lencioni Model
1. Lack of trust: if team members do not trust each other, they are unlikely to take risks or
ask for help. A lack of trust means a low level of comfort that makes it difficult to
2. Fear of conflict: avoiding conflict can lead to an artificial “peace” at the expense of
progress and innovation. Conflict is a normal part of teamwork and can be very productive if
managed effectively.
3. Lack of commitment: team members do not commit to doing the work, do not follow
through on decisions or tasks, do not meet deadlines, and let their teammates down, and
4. Avoidance of accountability.
5. Inattention to results: when team members focus on their own personal goals instead of
project goals, they lose sight of the expected results that actually measure the success of
the project. Not focusing on the results during the process means that no one is planning
According To My Opinion, Tuckman’s Model Is the Best Development Process and Most
Appropriate
1. The forming stage of group development: The forming stage is the first stage in
Tuckman’s stages of group development and is a similar experience to your first day
on a new job or at a new school. In this phase, most group members are overly polite
and are still extremely excited about what their future may hold. Since the group
dynamics and team roles aren’t yet established, the team leader will often take
charge to direct the individual members. During Tuckman’s forming phase, new
team members may discuss team goals, ground rules, and individual roles, but since
this stage of development prioritizes people over the actual work, it’s unlikely the
team will be high-performing at this time.
2. The storming stage of group development: The storming phase is like when you
reach that point with a new roommate where you begin to notice their small
idiosyncrasies that get on your nerves. For teams, conflict often arises due to
clashing working styles between team members. Some people may start to even
doubt the team’s goals discussed in the earlier stage and will stop performing their
necessary jobs altogether. This has a negative and stressful effect on those who keep
up the hard work since the pre-established group processes no longer function
smoothly. Some project teams think they can skip this stage, but it’s better to
acknowledge conflicts now and work them out rather than avoid them until they
explode.
3. The norming stage of group development: The next of Tuckman’s stages is the
norming phase. This is when the team moves past their previous quarrels and begins
to recognize and value their teammates’ strengths. During this stage, team members
increasingly respect those who are in leadership roles. Now that everyone has begun
to bond and familiarize themselves with the team processes
4. The performing stage of group development: The performing phase is the happiest
of all the stages of development. In this stage, your team performance is at an all-
time high. This high-performance level means all team members are self-reliant and
confident enough in their own problem-solving skills that they can function without
oversight from the leaders. Everyone is working like a well-oiled machine, free of
conflict and moving in sync toward the same end goal.
School as an institution has a very important influence on the adoption of social and cultural
patterns of the child’s behaviour. It is the place of adoption, selection, formation, and
imitation of attitudes, values, and norms that the child/young person will bring to his or her
society and culture in the future. If new generations do not adopt his way of life, society as
such ceases to exist.
Each school represents a very specific social environment regardless of the common
national curricula and the legal basis on which the functioning of the school as an institution
rests. A school in which a positive culture prevails, together with encouraging atmosphere
that promotes positive values, tolerance, understanding, partnership, cooperation, equality,
appreciation... encourages the adoption of such qualities in students as well.
Many studies emphasize the importance of the hidden curriculum in the process of
developing the students’ value system. The hidden curriculum is difficult to define explicitly
because it depends on both personal impression and experiences, as well as the variability
conditioned by constant social changes. The hidden curriculum assumes learning of
attitudes, norms, beliefs, values, and assumptions, which is all often expressed in the form
of unwritten rules, rituals, and regulations. It is reflected in the culture of school, the
characteristics and behaviour of teachers towards students and each other, the values they
promote as well as priorities and hierarchies they develop... Sociological as well as
pedagogical-phenomenological research has pointed to significant correlations of
pedagogical interaction with implicit education theories of individual teachers, their
attitudes and values, rather than with the official curriculum (Jackson, 1968; McGutcheon
1988). The role of the hidden curriculum needs to be systematically and thoughtfully
approached, questioned, and directed in the desirable direction. Although the hidden
curriculum is often perceived as destructive, negative, and subversive, it can be both
constructive and desirable. Many pedagogues note the space for its positive function
(Tanner, Tanner, 1980; Wren, 1999; Chhaya, 2003; Jerald, 2006). They see the school as a
harmonized and stimulating environment for learning and adopting values and attitudes.
The aim of this paper is to analyse the given field of study by reviewing the literature and to
juxtapose the mechanisms within schools that help adopt attitudes and build a system of
values for children and young people. Also, to think and aim to raise awareness of the
relationships between a part of the educational process that pedagogical experts and
teachers manage to systematize, prescribe, and control, and which belongs to the
intentional education as well as the part belonging to the area of the hidden, implicit
curriculum. In this context, the question of the socialization role of school in the formation
of contemporary society’s value forms is emphasized, and this issue will be regarded in the
context of the hidden curriculum.
Socialization may or may not affect the reflexive agent and may or may not bring a
desirable outcome. We can not guarantee that this process will influence all the
individuals of the society in the same manner and will produce the same impact. Many
socio-political theories postulate that socialization provides only a partial explanation for
human beliefs and behaviours. The individuals (or the agents) are not ‘blank slates’; they
also have a set of psychological and sociological factors determining them. There are
many studies which prove that human beings are influenced by a complex set of factors.
Biology, genes, learning abilities, language and many other factors play a strong role in
the growth of the individual. They play an equal part in building the behaviour of a
human being. Scientific research provides strong evidence that people are shaped by
both social influences and their biological makeup. Genetic studies have shown that a
person’s environment interacts with their genotype to influence behavioural outcomes.
The linguistic theory of generative grammar demonstrates how something such as the
capacity for learning changes throughout one’s lifetime.
Socialization is the primary means by which human infants begin to acquire the skills
necessary to perform as a functioning member of their society. This is said to be the most
influential learning processes one can experience.
Many philosophers have expressed their views on the process of socialization. Theories of
socialization are to be found in Plato, Montaigne and Rousseau. There is a dictionary entry
from 1828 that defines ‘socialize’ as ‘to render social, to make fit for living in society’.
However, it was Georg Simmel who popularized this concept and as a result it was
incorporated into various branches of psychology and anthropology. According to the major
theories, there are 6 types of socialization. They are
1. Primary socialization
2. Secondary socialization
3. Developmental socialization
4. Anticipatory socialization
5. Resocialization
6. Organizational socialization
Primary socialization: A child learns the attitudes, values and actions appropriate to
individuals as members of a particular culture. In the beginning it happens through the
interactions in the family and extended family and community. For example, the behaviour
and opinions of the parents have an impact on the child. When a child sees a particular
behaviour and opinions of his/her parents and the members of the society, the child thinks
this behaviour is acceptable. This leads to the child learning that particular
habit/behaviour/opinion. This process is called primary socialization.
Resocialization: In his/her lifetime a person learns and unlearns behaviours and values
constantly. Resocialization is the process of discarding former behavior patterns and
accepting new ones as part of a transition in one’s life. Resocialization can be an intense
experience because it involves breaking away from past beliefs and experiences. Also
he/she learns radically different norms and values. This is a significant part of any
individual’s life.
Organizational socialization: Human beings learn the knowledge and skills necessary to
assume his or her organizational role. This is known as Organizational socialization. They
learn about the organization and its history, values, jargon, culture, and procedures. They
also learn about
I. Socialization teaches us the language of the culture we are born into as well as the
roles we are to play in life.
II. Socialization teaches us the occupational roles we are meant to do in our lives.
III. We also learn and usually adopt our culture’s norms through the socialization
process.
The notions of appropriate/expected behaviour that are held by most members of the
society is known as norms. A cultural norm is an established standard of what a group
expects in terms of thought and conduct. These expectations and desirable behaviours often
vary from one culture to the next. They are also in different forms like the values, folkways
and morals. In every society there is reinforcement of morals. Anything that is contrary to
the moral like murder and robbery are met with punishment. This helps the members of the
society to learn and respect laws. Socialization refers to the general process of acquiring
culture. But anthropologists use the term enculturation for the process of being socialized
to a particular culture.
Uniformity within a society is achieved through successful socialization. If all children receive
the same socialization, they will share the same beliefs and expectations. This is one reason
why national governments try to standardize education and make it compulsory for all
children. They choose what things will be taught and how they are taught. This can be seen
as a powerful political tool for controlling people. This is an extremely strong tool to mold
people into law abiding citizens too. Through socialization governments stop people from
breaking the laws or wanting radical social changes. However, in societies there are
individuals who do not conform to culturally defined standards. Sociologists argue that such
exceptions happen because they have not internalized the norms of society.
The human child has a remarkable capacity to imitate others to develop according to the
tenets of environment. As a social animal, he/she tries to win the appreciation of the group
in which he/she lives. As a result, he/she naturally tries to imitate the culture of the group. It
is socialization that gives him/her a balanced personality. The social aspect of the
personality is no less important than the individual aspect. Socialization teaches him/her to
retain control over him/her in the interest of others.