Innovation Module
Innovation Module
SUPPLY CHAIN
AND LOGISTICS
MANAGEMENT
CHAPTER 1: Key Issue in Innovation
Management
Innovation?
satisfy the needs and expectation
of the customers
• In social – helps create new
methods for alliance creation, joint
venturing, flexible hours and
creation of buyer’s purchasing
POWER
What is
broad categories
1. Evolutionary Innovation
(continuous or dynamic
evolutionary innovations) –
What is
whereas invention refers more to
directly to the creation of the idea
or methods itself
innovation?
• Innovations differ from
improvement – innovation refer to
the notion of doing something
different rather than doing the
same thing better
Innovation and
Competitive Advantage
• Competitive advantage can come from size, possession of assets, outlooks and
functions of the products of process
• Advantage to organization which they can mobilize knowledge and technological
skills
Advantage
instead growth come from
other factor: design,
customization & quality
• Environment-friendly: ever
changing legislation on the
environment friendly products
• Offering better
services, being able to
do what others can not
Innovation as a
• Innovation – creating new
possibilities through
combining different sets of
Knowledge-
knowledge.
• Knowledge: may already exists
based on experience OR result
4 Phases
2. Strategically select from this
set of potential triggers for
innovation.
Process
Grow the idea through multiple
stages to the final product
launch.
5. Optional – reflect upon the
previous phases and review
experience of success and
failure.
Challenges,
1. Globalization of markets and
technology supply
2. Emergence of technologies
Same Old
enabling a “virtual” mode of
working
3. The growing concern about
Responses?
sustainability
4. The rise of networking as a
business model
“when something is
important enough, you do
it even if the odds are not
in your favor” – Elon
Musk, The greatest mind
in 21st century
INNOVATION IN SUPPLY
CHAIN AND LOGISTICS
MANAGEMENT
Chapter 2: Types of Innovation
Form of Innovation
INNOVATION IN SUPPLY
CHAIN AND LOGISTICS Chapter 3: Innovation as a
Management Process
MANAGEMENT
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES
At the end of the lesson, students should be able to :
1. Explain the importance of innovation in the organizations.
2. Identify the skills to manage innovation at the operational and strategic levels.
3. Describe organizations can be used innovation to improve their processes or to
differentiate their products and services.
4. Integrate the management of market, technological and organizational change to
improve the competitiveness of firms and effectiveness of the organizations.
Variations on a Theme
INNOVATIONS Size matters
AS A CORE National, Regional, Local Context
BUSINESS
Network & Systems
PROCESS –
THE ENABLERS Project-based Organizations
Do Better/Do Different
VARIATIONS ON A THEME
Innovations vary widely in scale, nature, degree of novelty and so-on – and so do innovating
organizations.
Developing new consumer products involve picking up signals about potential needs and new
technological possibilities, develop strategic concepts, come up with options and work those
products into launching to the new market.
Same goes to installing new technology of process. It involves the same patterns as
developing new consumer products.
Services – may different since it is less tangible – however the same model applies as above
Smaller organizations posses a range of advantages – agility, rapid decision-making – but
equally limitations E.g. resource constraints.
It means that developing effective innovation management will depend on creating
structures and behaviors.
To be clear, small organizations differ widely – small firms account for 95% or more of the
total world business, e.g hairdressing, high-tech start-up.
Often, small/medium sized enterprise (SME) failed to feature in surveys of R&D and other
formal indicator of innovation activity – but, they tend to engage in other innovation activity
such as process improvement or customer service.
SIZE MATTERS
NATIONAL, REGIONAL,
LOCAL CONTEXT
The emergence of ‘innovation system’ due to wider context
within which innovation takes place.
These include government, financial, educational, labour
market, science and technology infrastructure etc –
represents the context which organizations operate their
innovation process.
It can be local, regional or national – which how they
evolved and operate are varied.
NETWORKS AND
SYSTEMS
PROJECT-BASED
ORGANIZATIONS
For many enterprise – a real challenge is moving to project-based
organizations – specific project (build airport or hospital) or
managing the design and build around complex product systems
(flight simulators or jet engine)
This kind of organizations involve a systems which bring multiple
players from different elements into one single ‘cell’.
Usually involving different firms, long timescales and high level
technological risks.
The first term coined is ‘doing what we do but better’ – a ‘steady state’ in which
innovation happened, but within a defined envelope around.
It contrast with ‘do different’ in which the game rule of innovation have shifted –
due to major technological, market or political shifts for example – managing it is
more a process of exploration and co-evolution under conditions of high
uncertainty.
The generic model remain the same. They need to search for trigger signal, make a
strategic choices, implementing it and monitor it.
The only difference is that the ‘do better’ has much more flexibility.
DO BETTER/DO
DIFFERENT
WIDE RANGE OF INFLUENCES -
ORGANIZATION NEED TO CONFIGURE THEIR VERSION OF
INNOVATION PROCESS
CONTEXT MODIFIERS TO THE BASIC PROCESS
Sector Different sectors have different priorities and characteristics (scale-intensive,
science-intensive)
Size Small firms differ in terms of access to resources
National systems of Different countries have more or less supportive – institutions, policies
innovation
Life cycle (of tech, Different stages in life-cycle emphasize different aspect of innovation – new
industry) technology industries vs mature established firms
Degree of novelty ‘More of the same’ improvement innovation requires different approaches to
continuous vs organizations and management to more radical forms.
discontinuous
innovation
Role played by external Some sectors (utilities, telecommunications and some public services) are
agencies such as heavily influenced by external regimes in which shape the rate and direction of
regulators innovative activity.
EVOLVING MODELS OF THE
PROCESS
It is a great importance for us to view innovation as a process as we try to understanding shapes
the way in which we try and manage it.
Early models of innovation saw it as a linear sequence of functional activities.
There may be ‘push’ (technology push as new opportunities arise as it found its way into market)
and ‘pull’ (when the market signalled something new is needed which drew the problem into the
market)
A successful innovation require interaction between both. To put into simple analogy, a pair of
scissors, without both blade, it would be difficult to cut.
Most innovation is messy – false starts, recycling between stages, dead ends, jumps out of
sequence.
Andrew Van de Ven and colleagues explored the limitations of simple models of the process and
derived some important modifiers
Shocks trigger innovations – change happens when people or organizations reach a threshold of
opportunity or dissatisfaction.
Ideas proliferate – after starting out in a single direction, the process proliferates into multiple,
divergent progressions
Setbacks frequently arise, plans are over-optimistic, commitments escalate, mistakes accumulate
and vicious cycle developed.
Restructuring of the innovating unit often occurs through external intervention, personnel changes or
other unexpected events.
Top management plays a key role in sponsoring – but also in criticizing and shaping – innovation.
Success criteria shift over time, differ between groups and make innovation a political process
Innovation involves learning, but many of its outcome are due to other events which occur as the
innovation develops – making learning often ‘superstitious’ in nature.
EVOLVING MODELS OF
THE PROCESS
Roy Rothwell suggested that our appreciation of the nature of the innovation
process has been evolved, from simple linear to complex interactive models.
His ‘fifth-generation innovation’ sees innovation as a multi-actor process –
requires high level of integrations
SUCCESSFUL
INNOVATION
The components of sustainable innovations:
1. Vision and strategy for innovation
2. Culture and supporting innovation
3. Processes, practices, and systems supporting innovation
4. Top management team leading innovation
5. Cross-functional teams mapping innovation road
6. Empowered employees driving innovation
SUCCESS What do successful innovator have?
1. Sensing opportunity
INNOVAT
4. Prudence (cautiousness)
5. Emotional intelligence
INNOVATION IN
SUPPLY CHAIN
AND LOGISTICS
MANAGEMENT
Chapter 4: Developing The
Framework For An Innovation
Strategy
Rationalist Strategy
• Heavily influenced by military experience (in principle)
• Consists of the following steps:
1. Describe, understand and analyze the environment
2. Determine a course of action in the light of the analysis
3. Carry out the decided course of action
• A linear model: Appraise, determine and act
Rationalist Strategy
• The corporate equivalent is SWOT; analysis of corporate strength and
weakness in the light of external opportunities and threat.
• Intended to help the firm to:
• Be conscious of trends in the competitive environment
• Prepare for a changing future
• Ensure that sufficient attention is focused on the longer term, given the
pressures to concentrate on the day to day
• Ensure coherence in objectives and actions in large, functionally specialized
and geographically dispersed organizations
Rationalist Strategy
• The term ‘military’ can be misleading since the corporate objectives is to
satisfy customers better than competition – not mobilize resources to
destroy enemy.
• Plus, the managers have difficulties in appraising accurately the real
situation for 2 reasons:
1. Their external environment is complex – competitors, customers, regulators etc.;
and so fast changing, including technical, economic, social and political
change.
2. Managers in large firms disagree on their firms’ strength and weakness in part
due to their knowledge of what goes on inside the firm is imperfect.
Incrementalist Strategy
• Explicitly recognize that the firm has only very imperfect knowledge of its
environment, of its own strength and weakness, the likely rates and future
direction change.
• The most efficient procedure to adapts in light of new information and
understanding:
1. Make deliberate steps (or changes) towards stated objective
2. Measure and evaluate the effects of the steps (changes)
3. Adjust (if necessary) the objective and decide on the next step (change)
Incrementalist Strategy
• This sequence of behavior goes by many name – incrementalism,
trial and error. ‘suck it and see’, muddling through and learning.
When undertaken deliberately and based on strong background
knowledge, it has more respectable veneer such as:
• Symptoms – diagnosis – treatment – diagnosis – adjust treatment – cure
(for medical doctors dealing with patients)
• Design – development – test – adjust design – retest – operate (for
engineers making product and process innovation)
Technology and
Competitive
Analysis
TOWS Analysis
• A variant of a SWOT analysis and is an acronym for Threats, Opportunities,
Weaknesses and Strengths.
• A key criticism of a SWOT analysis is that it doesn’t show the relationships
between the different factors and categories.
• A TOWS analysis will look to match internal factors to external factors to
help identify relevant strategic options that an organization could pursue.
• It can help an organisation to see how it can take advantage of
opportunities, reduce threats, overcome weaknesses and exploit any
strengths
TOWS Analysis
Threat of new entrants New competition can affects an industry almost overnight, as when Kraft
Macaroni & Cheese is threatened from the low end by store brands and from the
high end by brands such as Annie’ Creamy Macaroni and Cheese
Bargaining power of Suppliers When there is little number of supplier compared to buyers. Some companies
can easily switch suppliers, but cannot, such as surfboard makers relying on
Clark Foam, which supplied 90% of the foam cores used to make custom
surfboard
Bargaining power of Buyers When the number of buyers is more than suppliers. Customers who buy a lot of
products or services from an organization have more bargaining power than
those who don’t.
Threats of Substitute An organization can use the internet to switch to other products or services when
Products or Services circumstances threaten their usual channels
Rivalry among Competitors The preceding four forces produce rivalry among competitors as is happening
among makers and sellers of portable electronics
Generic Market Strategies for Firms
• According to Porter, the firm must choose among four generic
market strategies
Overall Cost Leadership
Product Differentiation
Cost Focus
Differentiation Focus
Nature of its products and customers will strongly influence its degree
of choice between quality and cost.
Firms and technologies do not fit tidily into preordained and static industrial
structures - particularly in chemical and electrical-electronic industries
INNOVATION IN
SUPPLY CHAIN
AND LOGISTICS
MANAGEMENT
Chapter 5: National
Systems of Innovation
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES
At the end of the lesson, students should be able to :
1. Explain the importance of innovation in the organizations.
2. Identify the skills to manage innovation at the operational and
strategic levels.
3. Describe organizations can be used innovation to improve their
processes or to differentiate their products and services.
4. Integrate the management of market, technological and
organizational change to improve the competitiveness of firms and
effectiveness of the organizations.
These inputs include education and training, knowledge and intellectual property rights. These
assets tend to have ‘public’ properties – Aufah (2003)
Overall performance of an economy depends not on how specific institutions (firms, research
institutes, universities)perform – but how they interact with each other as ‘collective’ systems
elements of knowledge creation and use, and their interplay with social institutions such as values,
norms and legal frameworks – OECD (1997).
Simonetti (2001) – the notion of a collective system recognizes that, although innovation is often
introduced by private individuals and private firms, it is ultimately the product of a system of
institutions that are closely linked together by economic and social relationships.
National Innovation
System (NIS)
• The arrangement where it relates to innovation that used within
a particular nation.
• Function: to achieve sustained economic growth and
competitiveness in the global business environment.
• NIS has been defined as an:
‘interactive system of existing institutions, private and public
firms, university and government agencies, aiming at the
production of science and technology within national borders.
Interaction among these units maybe technical, commercial,
legal, social, educational and financial’ (Noisi et.al, 2006)
• Nation state highly influence innovative performance of nations
and it is also recognized as having links to the characteristics of
particular NIS
MOSTI
In the Seventh Mahathir cabinet, the entire component of the Ministry of Science,
Technology and Innovation (MOSTI), Green Technology and Energy Components
from the Ministry of Energy, Green Technology and Water (KeTTHA) and related
components of Climate Change and Environment from the Ministry of Natural
resources and Environment (NRE) has been restructured and formed the Ministry
of Energy, Science, Technology, Environment & Climate Change (MESTECC)
After the 2020 Malaysian political crisis, MESTECC has been restructured and its
name has been changed to the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation
(MOSTI) following the formation of the Muhyiddin cabinet
Promote an understanding,
awareness and appreciation of
MyIPO Objectives
MyIPO
Corporate
Governance
• It describes the system of
rules, practices and processes
by which a company is
directed and controlled.
• Essentially involves balancing
the interests of the many
stakeholders in a company –
these includes its
shareholders, management,
customers, suppliers,
financiers, government and
the community
• Two main approaches to
corporate governance:
1. Anglo – Saxon
2. Nippon Rhineland
Corporate Governance
Anglo - Saxon Nippon Rhineland
• Founded in the US and UK • Founded in the Japan and Germany
• Clear separation of ownership of • No sharp division between ownership and
corporate undertakings from their control.
control • The presence of multiple stakeholders in
the management of the firm and they
• Ownership lies in the hand of usually has details knowledge of the firm
stakeholders, many of whom are including its technological competence
institutional innovators while the
company control is left to professional • The stakeholders are better in evaluating
manager and the stakeholders know the long-term commercial potential of R&D
little about the internal operation of the activities
firm
Political Governance
The role of government in fostering innovation. It centers around 2 functions: The policy and regulating.
The regulatory function covers intellectual property rights (IPR) and environmental protection.
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) are designed to promote innovation, however without strong IPR, it is
difficult for innovators to appropriate the benefits of their endeavors because of imitation, copying and
counterfeiting.
Environmental protection falls outside of the control of national innovation system, it can influence
innovation to meet environmental standard and can act as a useful spur to innovation.
Institutions
Industrial Institutions
• Encompass both the broad industry structure that prevails within an
economy and the range of industrial undertaking with which a firm competes
and from which it obtains components and materials.
• Competition – overall level of competitiveness is the likely the key factor
within an economy.
• Monopoly might be beneficial for innovation – monopoly profits could
provide scope for funding high levels of R&D.
• Supply conditions can be important in facilitate innovation – the availability
of high-quality components at appropriate prices can be powerful boost to
innovation
JAPAN RUSSIA
High R&D/GNP (2.5%) Very high R&D/GNP (4%)
Low proportion of Military/Space R&D (<2% of R&D) Very high proportion of Military/Space R&D (>70% of
R&D)
High proportion of R&D at firm level (>60%) Low proportion of R&D at firm level (<10%)
R&D and imported technology integrated into R&D, imported technology and production poorly
production integrated with weak linkages
Strong user-producer and subcontractor linkages weak- or non-existence linkages between marketing,
production and procurement
Strong incentive to innovate at the firm level Largely top-down innovation following government
policy objectives
Intensive experience of competition in international Relatively weak exposure to international competition
markets
Science and Technology Institutions
Public funding of R&D can provide additional Government sponsorship of R&D can take
benefits beyond finding a way around the variety of context. Afuah (2003) identifies 4:
problem of appropriability. Afuah (2003)
identifies 4 benefits:
INNOVATION IN
SUPPLY CHAIN AND
LOGISTICS
MANAGEMENT
Chapter 6: Incentive and Rewards
What Are
Innovation
Incentives?
• If you want your employee
to come up with bombastic
ideas, you need to offer
bombastic rewards
• Innovation incentives – a
set of policies intended to
motivate employees to
innovate – enable them to
share the value derived
from the innovation
• An innovation required
both an idea and an
incentives to invest in
Incentivize
Innovation? Monetary rewards poses
another issue when innovation
involves lots of people. It may
be unfair to reward the person
who had the idea and not the
one who develop it or
implemented it.
Types of Incentive
• A portion of sales
• A different and original way to
reward innovation is giving
employees a portion of sales, both
for certain products and
development and for savings
derived from implementing
Financial improvements
Intangibles Incentives
• Public recognition
Letting people know who was behind
what, making it public knowledge that
certain individuals were the ones who
made an innovation happen.
Usually comes in 3 form: Paper
(newsletter), Digital (Intranet) and In
Person (meeting or special events).
• Access to restricted circle
The invitation to exclusive groups,
events or spaces
• Time
Reward people who give innovative
ideas with more time to think
• Research Resources
o Offer economic incentives to innovate in
the form of resources for research
Criteria for
Rewards
• Two principal reasons for caution:
1. Rewards can be
counterproductive. It occurs when
linking incentives to a particular
metric as the result can be
disastrous.
2. Some innovation metrics can
yield poor result due to not only to
those responsible for innovation,
but also to other department.
• In addition to quantitative and objective
criteria like metrics, we should also
introduce subjective criteria evaluations
(peers and/or managers evaluate
innovators) to rewards innovations
MAJOR TECHNOLOGICAL
TRAJECTORIES
• Focus on firms and broad technological
trajectories due to difference between firms and
industrial sectors in their underlying
technologies (e.g. making car is not the same as
making therapeutic drugs)
•Dealing with more than one technology, with
each of the technology has their own historical
pattern of development, skill requirement and
strategic implications.
•It is a major challenge to develop a framework,
for integrating changing technology into
strategic analysis
•It has been strongly influenced by the analyse of
the emergence of the major new technologies
over the past 150 years by Chris Freeman and
his colleague, and by David Mowery and Nathan
SIMILAR AND PERSISTENT DIFFERENCES
AMONGST INDUSTRIAL SECTORS IN THE SOURCES
AND DIRECTIONS OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE
ITEM DESCRIPTIONS
Size of Innovating Typically big in chemicals, road vehicles, materials processing,
Firms aircraft and electronic products; and small in machinery, instruments
and software
Type of product made Typically price sensitive in bulk materials and consumer products;
and performance sensitive in ethical drugs and machinery
Objectives of Typically product innovation in ethical drugs and machinery; process
innovation innovation in steel; both in automobiles
Sources of innovation Suppliers of equipment and other production inputs in agriculture
and traditional manufacture (like textiles); customers in instrument,
machinery and software; in-house technological activities in
chemical, electronics, transport, machinery, instruments and
software; basic research in ethical drugs
Locus of own R&D laboratories in chemicals and electronics; production
innovation engineering departments in automobiles and bulk materials; design
offices in machine building; systems departments in service (e.g.
MAJOR
strong possibility that many of the conclusions will be
misleading or plain wrong.
TECHNOLO
2. Saying that all firms and sectors are different, and that
no generalizations can be made.
IES
3. What are the major tasks of innovation strategy?
4. Where are the likely opportunities and threats, and how
can they be dealt with?
NG FIRM-
competencies, and on the difficulties that
competitors have in imitating them.
SPECIFIC
COMPETE
The notion of firm-specific competencies has
become increasingly influential amongst
economist, trying to explain why firms are
NCIES different, and how they change over time, and
also amongst business practitioners and
consultants, trying to identify the causes of
competitive success.
Developed by Gary Hamel and C.K. Prahalad.
AND
not in their products but in their core competencies
2. Core competencies feed into more than one core
PRAHALA
product, which in turn feed into more than one business
unit
D ON
3. The importance of associated organizational
competencies is also recognized
COMPETE
4. Core competencies require focus
5. The notion of core competencies suggests that large
and multidivisional firms should be viewed not only as a
NCIES collection of strategic business units (SBU), but also as
bundles of competencies that do not necessarily fir tidily
in one business unit. Two views of corporate structure
are shown on table next
TMS
• Increase the efficiency in loading
• Increase effectiveness in operation
• Minimize cost of transportation
• Synchronization between packing and routing
WMS
• Make daily operation much easier
• Easy to control the movement and product storage
• Synchronization the operation
• Can tracks the data from the products during the production process
OMS
• Communicate with the customers at the time of product inquiries
• Able to avoid from stock-out situation
• Check customer’s status and verify credit outstanding
OGY AND
strategy? – R&D
oFunctions of Technical Director:
CORPORA 1. To provide a technical awareness within the company
and a ‘window’ on the external world of technology
STRATEGY business
3. To provide a technical input into reviews of new
business opportunities
4. To determine the overall technical strategy consistent
with corporate requirements
SAP
an enterprise resource planning
software developed by the
German company SAP SE.
SAP ERP incorporates the key
business functions of an
organization
SAP refers an acronyms to
Systems, Application and
Products
SAP
oIntegrating Business Components
oAs the key advantage as they choose SAP as their enterprise application
system
oOther companies used best-of-breed approach – developed complex
interfaces to integrate the separate software packages.
oSupporting and maintaining just one system proved to yield a significant
cost saving for companies
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES
• Bar coding
• Commonly used automatic identification technology
• Consistency – important factor in efficiency and effectiveness
• Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)
• Business-to-business, computer-to-computer exchange of business data in a
structured, machine-processable format
TECHNOLOGIES Imaging
TELECOMMUNICATION VIA
SATELLITE
5 ways the satellite will help the logistics operation and example
Reduce Risk
Improve
Fleet
Safety and
Monitoring
Security
Optimize
Fleet
All-Satellite
Operations
GPS Tracking
with Real-
Time
GLOBAL
POSITIONING
SYSTEM (GPS)
• A space-based satellite
navigation system, that
provides location and time
information in all weather
conditions, anywhere on or
near the Earth where there is
an unobstructed line of sights
to four or more GPS satellites.
The system provides critical
capabilities to military, civil
and commercial users around
the world
GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM
(GPS)
• User segments:
1. Military
2. Search and rescue
3. Disaster relief
4. Surveying
5. Marine, aeronautical and terrestrial navigation
6. Remote controlled vehicle and robot guidance
7. Satellite positioning and tracking
8. Shipping
9. Geographic Information System (GIS)
10. Recreation
• The importance/functions
• Position and coordinates
• The distance and direction between any two
waypoints, or a position and a waypoint GLOBAL
POSITIONING
• Travel progress reports
SYSTEM (GPS)
• Accurate time measurement
RADIO FREQUENCY
IDENTIFICATION (RFID)
RFID
Return to Repair /
Refurbish
supplier repackage
Sell to
Sell with
Sell as new secondary
discount
market
Donate to
Recycle
charity
PERVASIVE AUTOMATION
Realization of products connectivity where internet – Convergence a valuable technologies RFID’s, wireless
enabled microprocessors provide digital intelligence communication do not require human interaction and
and connectivity almost commercial and industrial support supply chain innovation
products.
TODAY’S EXERCISE !
To survive in today’s tidal wave of global economic, technological, and social change,
understanding how powerful forces are aggregating once-distinct product and geographic
market, enhancing market-clearing efficiency, and increasing specialization in the supply
chain
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
• The process of linking innovation strategy with corporate vision, goals, objectives and
strategy
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
• The cost and time required to create a new product or service are so large that lack of a
perfectly aligned and executed innovation strategy can be extremely wasteful.
• Strategic alignment creates a directional beacon that defines which domains to explore
and which ones to avoid
7 DIMENSIONS
OF STRATEGIC
ALIGNMENT
Consumer/Customer Insight provides a ‘bottom-up’ perspective, a deep understanding of both articulated (explicitly stated) and
unarticulated (latent or unrecognized) need of existing and potential consumers/customers
Core Technologies and Competencies is the set of internal capabilities, organizational competencies and assets that could potentially
be leveraged to deliver value to customers, including technologies, intellectual property, brand equity and strategic relationships
A company’s Organizational Readiness may drive or inhibits its ability to act upon and implement new ideas and strategies, and to
successfully manage operational, political, cultural and financial demands that will follow
Lastly, success will be enabled or limited by an organization’s capacity for effective Disciplined Implementation.
Differentiation strategies Concerns on the way the company differentiate what they are offering to
the customer from those of competing organization
Time based strategies Time is money, therefore the choices of transportation mode will provide
a positive effect in term of inventory and warehousing cost
Reducing cycle time Reductions in cycle time are based on 3 factors: process, information and
decision making
Time reduction logistics Utilization of information technologies for product tracking and tracing,
initiative optical scanning, bar coding, stock location and so on
Financial strategies The pursuit of operational efficiency, by placing a priority on cost control,
performance effectiveness and efficiency, and viable measurement
strategies, companies are able to improve financial performance
• Inventory productivity – Just In Time (JIT), Vendor
Management Inventory (VMI), Continuous
Replenishment (CRP).
• Facility Utilization – supplier locations, plants,
warehouses, distribution centers or customers
locations, the objective is the same – to see that
INNOVATION these facilities are utilized to an extent that will
SUPPLY CHAIN produce close to optimal efficiency
• Strategic alliance
A process where participants willingly modify basic
business practices to reduce duplication and waste
while facilitating improved performance.
Instead of encouraging companies to hold their
information close, trust-building processes promote
the sharing of all forms of information possible that
RELATIONSHIP – will allow supply chain members to make better and
BASED aligned decisions.
STRATEGIES A typical supplier-customer alliance involves a single
supplier and a single customer.
Can develop between two horizontal suppliers, e.g.
Microsoft and Dell
A vertical supplier – supplier alliance may involve
multiple parties, such as transportation providers who
must coordinate their efforts for multimodal
shipments.
BASED
STRATEGIES Merger & Acquisition Trends – larger, national/global
presences of utilities require more strategic supplier
relationships to support growth and cost synergy targets
ADVANTAGE DISADVANTAGE
Most innovative way to develop processes that Can result in a loss of flexibility for the organization to
reduce costs opportunities and expertise for each take quick action in another area that may be in the
participating organization and add value for the organization’s better interests than the area they are
partners pursuing with a given partner
Long-term supply chain relationships create an Can become ineffective if one partner doesn’t
environment for developing innovative solutions to perform at the expected level or fulfill its obligations
problems and challenges to the agreement
Can capitalize on the individual strengths of each Usually limited in scope to the objectives of the
participating organization alliance or partnerships
Involves shared responsibility for the development Can consume more human and financial resources
and execution of a particular program or service than were anticipated
Limits a participating organization’s liability to the Can require a significant time investment to develop
scope of project involved an effective alliance or partnership
• International supplier
• Raw material and component (foreign supplier), final assembly/
manufacturing (domestic)
• Offshore manufacturing
GLOBAL • Product is sourced and manufactured in a single foreign
STRATEGIES location
• Shipped back to domestic warehouse for sale and distribution
Shared vision, leadership and the will to innovate • Clearly articulated and shared sense of purpose
• Stretching strategic intent
• ‘Top management commitment’
• If yes, then you must create an inspiring corporate culture that inspires, empowers
and energizes them
• People do what they have to do for a manager, they do their best for an inspirational
leader.
Groups have more to offer than individuals in terms of both fluency of idea
generation and in flexibility of solutions developed
Cross-functional team:
Bring together the different knowledge sets needed for tasks like product
development/process improvement;
Deep-rooted differences in perspective can be resolved.
1. Forming
• They are put together
2. Storming
• Resolving internal differences & conflicts around
leadership, objective, etc.