Nonconformity management

Organization name Kunstocom ( India ) Ltd

Audit start date 21.Feb.2022

Audit end date 22.Feb.2022

Audit type 1st Surveillance audit

CB identification no. PRJC-18255-2007-MSC-IND

CB certificate no. 07465CC1-2012-AQ-IND-IATF,

Additionally to this report a digital NC management report file will be provided by the auditor which has to be completed in IATF NC
CARA at https://nc-cara.iatfglobaloversight.org. All information about the software and use is provided in the documentation
accessible at the provided link.

Organization name : Kunstocom ( India ) Ltd CB certificate no.: 07465CC1-2012-AQ-IND-IATF, Cara Version 1.3
1/8
 Nonconformity management

NC no. NC identification no. Standard Standard clause Classification Due date max. 20 days Due date max. 60 days Nonconformity observed in process

1 LOF 1 IATF 16949:2016 7.1.5.1.1 minor 23.Apr.2022 QA

2 LOF2 IATF 16949:2016 10.2.4 minor 23.Apr.2022 Production - Moulding

3 LOF3 IATF 16949:2016 7.2.1 minor 23.Apr.2022 HR

Organization name : Kunstocom ( India ) Ltd CB certificate no.: 07465CC1-2012-AQ-IND-IATF, Cara Version 1.3
2/8
 Nonconformity management

NC & actions
Nonconformity 1
To be completed by the CB auditor

NC header

NC identification no. LOF 1

Standard IATF 16949:2016

Classification minor

Due date max. 60 days 23.Apr.2022

Nonconformity observed in process QA

Standard clause 7.1.5.1.1

Measurement systems analysis

Requirement
Statistical studies shall be conducted to analyse the variation present in the results of each type of inspection, measurement, and test
equipment system identified in the control plan. The analytical methods and acceptance criteria used shall conform to those in reference
manuals on measurement systems analysis. Other analytical methods and acceptance criteria may be used if approved by the customer.
Records of customer acceptance of alternative methods shall be retained along with results from alternative measurement systems analysis
(see Section 9.1.1.1).

Statement of nonconformity

The process of MSA was not found fully effective.

Objective evidence

Refr the MSA Vernier caliper-11/10/21 R&R- 12.31, AV-28.18, EV- 11.66ndc-1 and no action defined.

Justification for classification

1 sample found out of 5 sample.

Radha Jha 22.Feb.2022 This document is valid without a signature

Auditor´s name Audit closing meeting date

To be completed by the organization

S1 Correction (Containment) action, including timing and responsible person:

MSA rechecked and some overlapping of formulas observed in file which is corrected .

S2 Evidence of implementation

MSA done again with high accuracy of instrument and same instrument also verified with data calculation in MINITAB

S3 Root cause analysis

w1- MSA was not observed Ok.

w2- NDC value was observed 1 which is not OK.
W3- Appraiser was not aware about the NDC value.
w4- Appraiser was semiskilled to perform MSA.
W5- Training effectiveness not measure.

Does the root cause impact other similar processes or products? Yes

Please describe how the root cause impacts other process? Unskilled or semiskilled appraiser can detoriate the measurement
system

Organization name : Kunstocom ( India ) Ltd CB certificate no.: 07465CC1-2012-AQ-IND-IATF, Cara Version 1.3
3/8
 Nonconformity management

S4 Root cause result

Training Effectiveness not measured.

S5 Systemic corrective actions, including timing and responsible person

Re-training donne for MSA with ease of training material and Effectiveness monitored on basis of written test by Sandeep verma on 21.03.2022.

S6 Evidence of implementation

Missing required

S7 Action taken to verify effective implementation of corrective actions

MSA to be verified with a defined frequency of Quarterly basis as per MSA procedure and MSA Plan.

Submission(s)

Sandeep Verma 28.Mar.2022

Organizations representative date

Organization name : Kunstocom ( India ) Ltd CB certificate no.: 07465CC1-2012-AQ-IND-IATF, Cara Version 1.3
4/8
 Nonconformity management

Nonconformity 2
To be completed by the CB auditor

NC header

NC identification no. LOF2

Standard IATF 16949:2016

Classification minor

Due date max. 60 days 23.Apr.2022

Nonconformity observed in process Production - Moulding

Standard clause 10.2.4

Error-proofing

Requirement
The organization shall have a documented process to determine the use of appropriate error-proofing methodologies. Details of the method
used shall be documented in the process risk analysis (such as PFMEA) and test frequencies shall be documented in the control plan.
The process shall include the testing of error-proofing devices for failure or simulated failure. Records shall be maintained. Challenge parts,
when used, shall be identified, controlled, verified, and calibrated where feasible. Error-proofing device failures shall have a reaction plan.

Statement of nonconformity

The process of error proofing was not found fully effective.

Objective evidence

Verified control plan Verified Cover Change lever and found error proofing for temperature variation was not verified.

Justification for classification

1 sample found out of 2 . Witnessed the error proofing working all found ok. Parts are checked 100% so customer found safe.

Radha Jha 22.Feb.2022 This document is valid without a signature

Auditor´s name Audit closing meeting date

To be completed by the organization

S1 Correction (Containment) action, including timing and responsible person:

Control plan revised with the checkpoints of Error proofing techniques.

S2 Evidence of implementation

Control plan and FMEA both revised with POKA-YOKE checkpoints of temperature for Cover change lever.

S3 Root cause analysis

W1- no checkpoint of POKa-Yoke in control plan.

w2- Control plan not revised with error proofing check points.
W3- SOP not performed.
W4- Negligency of quality inspector during control plan revision.

Does the root cause impact other similar processes or products? Yes

Please describe how the root cause impacts other process? Some critical checkpoints may skip through inspection that may lead
to major breakdown or non-confirmity.

Organization name : Kunstocom ( India ) Ltd CB certificate no.: 07465CC1-2012-AQ-IND-IATF, Cara Version 1.3
5/8
 Nonconformity management

S4 Root cause result

Negligency of Inspector during Control plan revision.

S5 Systemic corrective actions, including timing and responsible person

Control plan revised with checkpoint of Error proofing for temperature. Same to be updated in FMEA by Sandeep Verma on 03.04.2022.

S6 Evidence of implementation

Revised Control plan and FMEA with third revision on 03.04.2022.

S7 Action taken to verify effective implementation of corrective actions

COntrol plan and FMEA both to be verify during time of internal audit as per SOP.

Submission(s)

Sandeep Verma 03.Apr.2022

Organizations representative date

Organization name : Kunstocom ( India ) Ltd CB certificate no.: 07465CC1-2012-AQ-IND-IATF, Cara Version 1.3
6/8
 Nonconformity management

Nonconformity 3
To be completed by the CB auditor

NC header

NC identification no. LOF3

Standard IATF 16949:2016

Classification minor

Due date max. 60 days 23.Apr.2022

Nonconformity observed in process HR

Standard clause 7.2.1

Competence - supplemental

Requirement
The organization shall establish and maintain a documented process(es) for identifying training needs including awareness (see Section 7.3.1)
and achieving competence of all personnel performing activities affecting conformity to product and process requirements. Personnel
performing specific assigned tasks shall be qualified, as required, with particular attention to the satisfaction of customer requirements.
To reduce or eliminate risks to the organization, the training and awareness shall also include information about prevention relevant for the
organization’s working environments and employees’ responsibilities, such as recognizing the symptoms of pending equipment failure and/or
attempted cyber-attacks.

Statement of nonconformity

The process of training was not found fully effective.

Objective evidence

Refer the training calendar and found cyber attack training was not covered.

Justification for classification

1 sample found out of 4. It control are implemented and monitored.

Radha Jha 22.Feb.2022 This document is valid without a signature

Auditor´s name Audit closing meeting date

To be completed by the organization

S1 Correction (Containment) action, including timing and responsible person:

Training plan revised with Cyber attack training.

S2 Evidence of implementation

Updated training plan for the FY 2022-2023.

S3 Root cause analysis

W1- Cyber attack training not provided.

W2- No provision of training topic selection was followed.
W3- TNI was not identified with all departments and update.
W4- Negligency of HR Executive during TNI identification.

Does the root cause impact other similar processes or products? Yes

Please describe how the root cause impacts other process? Some critical training topics from current affairs may skip.

Organization name : Kunstocom ( India ) Ltd CB certificate no.: 07465CC1-2012-AQ-IND-IATF, Cara Version 1.3
7/8
 Nonconformity management

S4 Root cause result

Negligency during TNI identification.

S5 Systemic corrective actions, including timing and responsible person

Training need identification revalidate including all department and training plan made on basis of TNI. Provision of TNI made to revised on half
yearly basis and same to be verify by MR.

S6 Evidence of implementation

Updated training plan for FY-2022-2023.

S7 Action taken to verify effective implementation of corrective actions

Training plan and TNI to be verify on monthly basis by MR and validated with a frequency of six month regularly.

Submission(s)

Sandeep Verma 06.Apr.2022

Organizations representative date

Organization name : Kunstocom ( India ) Ltd CB certificate no.: 07465CC1-2012-AQ-IND-IATF, Cara Version 1.3
8/8