0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views

Quality Function Deployment: Positive Negative

The document describes a quality function deployment project for car manufacturing. It lists customer requirements and their importance, technical specifications that meet the requirements, and their relationships and scores. It also provides a competitive evaluation and details on target performance.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views

Quality Function Deployment: Positive Negative

The document describes a quality function deployment project for car manufacturing. It lists customer requirements and their importance, technical specifications that meet the requirements, and their relationships and scores. It also provides a competitive evaluation and details on target performance.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Quality Function Deployment

Project title: Car manufacturing + Correlation:


Project leader: - . + . -
Date: Positive No correlation Negative
+ . .

+ + . . Relationships:
9 3 1
Desired direction of improvement (↑,0,↓) Strong Moderate Weak
Functional Requirements (How's)
1: low, 5: high → Fuel and Competitive evaluation (1: low, 5: high)
Engine size and
Car weight Car dimensions propulsion User interface
Customer horsepower Weighted Satisfaction Competitor Competitor
technologies
importance rating Customer Requirements - (What's) Score rating rating 1 rating 2

1 2 Speed 9 1 9 1 40
2 3 Fuel economy 1 9 9 57
3 5 Safe 3 1 1 1 30
4 3 Cost effective 1 3 1 1 18
5 4 Comfortable 1 1 3 20
6 5 Reliable 1 1 3 1 30
7 4 Visual appeal 1 3 16
8 3 Environmental effects 1 1 9 33
9 0
Technical importance score 47 15 66 79 37 244
Importance % 19% 6% 27% 32% 15% 100%
Priorities rank 3 5 2 1 4
Current performance
Target
Benchmark
Difficulty 1: very easy, 5: very difficult
Cost and time 1: low, 5: high
Priority to improve

Comments/Conclusion:

Continuous Improvement Toolkit . www.citoolkit.com


None

Competitive evaluation (1: low, 5: high)

Competitor
rating 3

ment Toolkit . www.citoolkit.com

You might also like