Cma Microproject GRP 10
Cma Microproject GRP 10
TECHNICAL EDUCATION
(MSBTE)
GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC YAVATMAL
Dhamangaon Road, Yavatmal-445001
DEPARTMENT OF
CIVIL ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT(22061)
GUIDED BY
Submitted by
Roll No.: Name of Student Enrollment No.
20 Pranav Kishor Makode 1901350290
29 Tarang Vijayrao Gulhane 1901350300
42 Yash Shrikant Kandalkar 1901350313
60 Himanshu Kashiram Chavan 1901350332
61 Shreyank Shrikant Mungilwar 1901350333
Dr.R.P Mogare
Principal
Government Polytechnic,Yavatmal
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
SR.
NO. WEEK ACTIVITY PERFORMED SIGN OF GUIDE DATE
10 10th Seminar
Annexure II
Part-B Micro-Project
Report Title:
‘’Interpret the network figures used in given civil engineering projects.’’
5.0 Rationale:
In the construction practice, at the stage of planning of a
construction project, planners are trying to take into account the
possibility of unfavorable situations and their consequences
during the project execution. Therefore, planning decisions
should use appropriate tools for uncertainty modeling as well as
consider alternative options for the implementation of the entire
undertaking or the most sensitive (critical) works. Taking into
account the fact that the management and planning of
construction projects is carried out in conditions of non-stochastic
uncertainty, the authors propose to create an alternative model
with a fuzzy decision node based on classical network models.
This approach allows to model activities that are alternative to
each other. An important methodological element is the fuzzy
assessment of the considered alternatives with the use of fuzzy
set theory. The proposed alternative network model with a fuzzy
decision node gives the possibility to conduct a comprehensive
analysis with the possibility of taking into account and modeling
the uncertainty of input data in an easy way. The numerical
example shows the possibility of quick selection of the best
variant based on the adopted assessment criteria and allows to
serialize work variants, which gives additional information in the
alternative activities of the network model in the form of
preferences. The combination of a decision model in the form of
a decision node with a network model can be useful in both
strategic and tactical planning of the implementation of
construction projects.
Network Techniques
The Gantt chart was later modified to a bar chart, which was used as an
important tool in both the project and production schedule.
The bar charts then developed into milestone charts and next into
network techniques (such as CPM and PERT). The bar chart didn't
give information about critical activity and interdependence among
activities. A bar chart is activity-oriented while a milestone chart is
event-oriented.
Network Construction
Activity
• The initial event, which has all outgoing arrows and no incoming arrow,
is numbered as 1.
• Delete all the arrows coming out from the node just numbered (i.e. 1).
This step will create some more nodes (at least one) into the initial
events. Number these events in ascending order (i.e. 2, 3 etc.).
• Continue the process until the final or terminal node which has all
arrows coming in, with no arrow going out, is numbered.
Rule 1: Each activity is represented by one and only one arrow in the network.
Rule 2: No two activities can be identified by the same end events.
Activity times
Float denotes the range within which activity time or its finish time may
fluctuate without effecting the completion of the project.
Or
The tail end and head end of the arrow represent the start and finish of activity
respectively.
When two or more activities start parallel then an activity called DEBUT (D0) is
provided at the beginning. Likewise, a finish activity (F0) is provided at the end
when more than one activities finish parallel. Activity D & F have zero duration.