Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

The Consciousness Revolution in Science

The inner workings of the primal cosmic mish-mash which
yields our senses of spirit, consciousness and our
interpretations of nature/physics
James E. Beichler
Abstract: It is no coincidence that the many theoretical physicists are ‘suggesting’ that our final
physical reality could be time, bits, a hologram, a computer program, information, 1s and 0s,
mathematics, or some other intangible quantity while many consciousness scientists and
philosophers suggest that human consciousness might be time, bits, a hologram, a computer
program, information, 1s and 0s, mathematics, or some other intangible quality. They are making
these ridiculous claims independent of each other because each group is facing their own inabilities
to move forward, and they are both grasping at straws, in this case the same straws. They are both
facing conundrums of thought and do not realize that they are confusing the advance of science
rather than advancing science. In the meantime, neuroscientists, technicians and engineers are
developing machines that read peoples’ minds and developing brain/machine interfaces and
advanced computer AI that seems to render the questions regarding human consciousness and
spirituality either even more important or completely irrelevant. This is the mish-mash that is the
present state of science, but a revolution, not only in physics and science, but in human thought and
evolution itself, that will change all of this is on the offing.

Keywords: mind, consciousness, Chi, Qi, Axial Age, thermodynamics, physical evolution,
hyperspace, higher consciousness, true self, physics of consciousness, neural correlates of
consciousness, microtubules, whole-brain coherence, whole-body coherence, NDEs, spiritual
enlightenment, intuition, paranormal phenomena, survival after death

Introduction
The truth is that at the most advanced levels of science, people cannot tell the difference
between the consciousness interpreting our external reality, i.e, the “physics of the observer”, and/or
our experienced physical reality, i.e., “physics of the observed”. This truth is complicated by the
simple fact that no one seems to be able to accurately define consciousness in any meaningful terms
that fit modern physical theory and paradigms and the same is true for the desired goal of normal
physics to unify or join those same paradigms and theories of physics into one consistent whole
because the two major proponents – the quantum and relativity – seem to be mutually incompatible.
There is but one solution to this dilemma and it consists of four parts:
(1) A complete and comprehensive theoretical unification of physics that considers human
consciousness needs to be developed;
(2) A physical theory of evolution in which biological evolution is only a special case
needs to be developed to account for consciousness;
(3) Definitions of not just consciousness, but corresponding definitions of life, i.e., the
biofield or ‘life force’ that goes beyond just modern biology, mind and consciousness in

1
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

terms of physics also need to be developed; And,

(4) A working verifiable physical model of the neural correlates of consciousness that explains how
consciousness either emerges in the brain of a person or the how brain could interact with a
hypothetical external consciousness to emerge as thought or streams of thought in
the brain, and how either case then proceeds to whole-brain coherence (cognition).
Without these four, and future physical theory of consciousness would be untenable, non-
scientific and probably nonfalsifiable.
As a further complication, we also must deal with other questions, such as the existence of
paranormal phenomena and the possibility of an afterlife as soon as, if not before, any realistic
physical theory of consciousness can be considered because a real independent consciousness
directly implies their reality. But science, as it now defines itself, will never accept the paranormal
and related phenomena, let alone the possibility of an afterlife, no matter how much evidence is
gathered and no matter how convincing that evidence is, because science has never developed the conceptual
or intellectual tools, or even the vocabulary to handle such possibilities. So, accepting this possibility
could completely redefine science and how science regards and looks at physical reality. Yet, science
will only accept the paranormal and the possibility of an afterlife when a new theory of physical
reality emerges, such as a unification of general relativity and the quantum theory in physics, that
directly and logically implies the existence of them from its fundamental principles. This physical
theory of reality can only be accepted by science for purely physical reasons that have nothing to do
with its paranormal implications which will emerge naturally and logically from the unification
theory. So, this fact literally creates a ‘catch 22’ situation for anyone attempting to develop a physical
theory of consciousness and guarantees that fulfilling this goal would be revolutionary, yet it is
happening right now!
Consciousness, as the ultimate perceiver and interpreter of our reality, both internal as well as
external, is in the background of all that is paranormal, if not for the actual source of all that is
paranormal. Given this truth, consciousness itself, which is far more acceptable to the scientific
community than the paranormal, fares no better than the paranormal and physical concepts of the
afterlife. This is true for the most part because human consciousness is considered by most scientists
as an epiphenomenon or accidental occurrence of nature and evolution. And then again, only
humans are thought to be have ‘consciousness’ in the common scientific opinion. This idea extends
further to the implication that humans are the only conscious beings in the whole universe, an idea
which is simply and completely stupid and egocentric. Nicholas Copernicus began to rid science of
the geocentric worldview in 1543 and establish the heliocentric worldview, but by the time of Isaac
Newton in 1687 our home world became just one of many throughout a universe with no center.
Yet for all that time until the present we have still been believers in a perfectly egocentric universe.
Moving on, nobody has been able to develop a credible theoretical model of consciousness
because it is and will be impossible to do so until we have a better understanding of the physical
universe which the human mind and consciousness are sensing and interpreting So, unification in
physics is a necessary precursor for us to even begin understanding and developing a credible model
of consciousness, physical or not. Given this, consciousness is a perfectly natural occurrence and
expected evolutionary emergent ‘thing-in-itself ’, such that it is not epiphenomenal as is commonly
thought by many modern scientists. Consciousness must also be physical at some level, not some
esoteric metaphysical quantity or quality, even though non-material, since it clearly interacts with the
physical world through our brain and body if not directly. Enough observances and evidence also

2
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

indicate that consciousness very likely acts directly outside of and beyond any person’s embodied
mind, both locally and non-locally. Under these circumstances, physics and physics alone in a new
complete and comprehensive form opens the door for anomalous and paranormal phenomena,
which are not quite three-dimensionally normal but still quite natural to our experienced reality.
And, in fact, nature and the universe constantly and always push life toward developing greater
and more comprehensive consciousness. The further this line of development and complexification
of consciousness proceeds, the more the universe becomes ‘conscious’ of itself from an internal
point-of-view since there is nothing external by which the universe could become consciously aware
of itself. In a very real sense, we and all other forms of life are just parts of an evolving universe
realizing its own ‘higher self’ and our ‘purpose in life’ is to increase our consciousness both
quantitatively and qualitatively for the sake of the universe. To be more realistic then, evolution, and
not entropy, is the true arrow of time as we will learn in some future evolutionary level of
consciousness that is much higher than we presently possess, at least if we don’t destroy ourselves
first. Evolution is every bit as fundamental to the very point structure of our universe as is time itself.

Our reality and a fully unified physics

Our present normal reality is, for all intents and purposes, material and three-dimensional, but it
is three-dimensional only because our minds give the material bodies by which we sense the world
three-dimensionality – we do not and cannot sense space itself, only the material objects and
physical fields that occupy space. Yet the three-dimensionality of matter and material bodies in space
does not necessarily require that space itself must be limited to three dimensions. So, the space and
physical fields in which those material bodies exist is not necessarily three-dimensional and we have
been three-dimensionally brainwashed and biased since birth. In all truth, our space of experience is
not three-dimensional as we normally sense it, it is more accurately four-dimensional which is easily
‘provable’.
If we take a line or segment of a line, a one-dimensional ‘thing’, it can turn or spin internally
within itself, but it can also twist and turn about tis center as well as about any point within its length
in a higher two-dimensional space. The same is true for a square, an ideal two-dimensional object. It
can spin, twist or turn about its center or any point within or outside of itself and remain within the
two-dimensional space that it creates. But it can also spin, twist and turn about any point within
itself as well as outside of itself within a higher three-dimensional space. If we continue this
progression, we have a three-dimensional square the same should be and is true.
While the same can twist, turn and spin about any point within itself and/or outside of itself in
the three-dimensional space, theoretically it can also do so in a higher four-dimensional space, but
we cannot accomplish or demonstrate this fete and science needs to answer the question why we
cannot do it. The answer is not and cannot be that space is limited to three dimensions alone
because we still need some form of four-dimensional mathematics to completely describe the three-
dimensional rotations and circular motions that characterize our three-dimensional space as
experienced, let alone think about the very possibility in a realistic way although it is true, because
our brains, minds and normal consciousness are completely three-dimensionally dominated.
For example, it is impossible to describe all possible rotations and circular motions of material
bodies in just three-dimensions of space. This predicament and mathematical anomaly has long been
know in mathematics since it takes a four-dimensional space to completely describe the three-
dimensional rotations, orbits, spins, turns and twists, of a real material three-dimensional object.

3
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

This problem was first solved by William Rowan Hamilton in 1843. Considering this exact same
question, he developed a four-dimensional numbering system as well as an algebra that could
mathematically and theoretically describe the rotational motions of real material objects in a four-
dimensional space. He named this numbering and algebraic system ‘quaternions’, the ‘qua’ standing
for four.
For physics and science, that simple truth means that a vast amount of our universe is not
normally sensed by us, but it is sensed paranormally by our consciousness. It also means that our
present laws and theories of ‘physics’, that particular science which claims to describe reality as
sensed and perceived by consciousness, are grossly incomplete. Take for example Newton’s law of
gravity (F=mg) with the calculated force being the observed or experienced weight of an object.
However, that weight only take into consideration the three-dimensional aspects of matter and not
the four-dimensionality of space and any possible effects it might have on the weight or other forces
on a gravitationally attracted material body.
So instead we add a second factor which considers all the rest of three-dimensional space (),
which gives us a complete description of the possible rotations and circular motions of a gravitating
pair of material bodies, the equation (F=mg + mv). Coincidentally, the first term of the
equation only reflects the extension (space) distance between the centers of mass of the two bodies
that are attracted gravitationally, while the second or new term is about the point (space) change in
position of the orbiting (less massive) body around the combined center of mass of both bodies,
thus accounting for both the extension and point aspects of real physical space.
The same is true for Einstein’s gravity equation (Tijk=Gijk). The tensor T represents the matter-
energy stress within space caused by the mass of an object while the tensor G represents the
equivalent curvature of three-dimensional space or the space-time continuum if we consider the
moment-to-moment change in position of a gravitationally attracted object to a central heavier
object. However, this equation is also fundamentally incomplete because it does not consider all
possible motions with respect to a fourth dimension of space.
The equation should be (Tijk=Gijk + ijk + ) where the two new tensor terms of  and ,
represent the point effect of the inertial mass of the orbiting body as opposed to the gravitational
mass or curvature (extension) effect of the central body both relative to the fourth embedding
spatial dimension of a five-dimensional space-time continuum. Otherwise,  represents and explains
how the effect of Dark Energy at the points of space influences on the inertia of the orbiting object
and  the relative Dark Matter effect causing the release of Dark Energy from the points in space
on the net momentum of the orbiting object. We now have a complete description of all the forces
and effects acting on gravitationally attracted material objects in our three-dimensional space of
experience.
Under these circumstances, unification of the gravity field with the electromagnetic field and
the quantum is not only possible, but it is quite easy and so straight forward that it has already been
finished. Unification is so straight forward that it can be represented by one simple graphic.

4
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

This graphic is also easy to interpret, even for a non-physicist. The single field of pure potential (S) is
split into its extension (F) and point (G) spatial components, represented by the electromagnetism
and gravitogravnetism tensors, respectively, along the fourth direction of space. Since gravity is only
a point along the fourth direction of space it is far weaker (~1040) than extended electromagnetism
in our three-dimensional world, solving the hierarchy problem in physics. Their split yields the
electromagnetic tensor equation and the gravitogravnetic tensor equation in three-dimensional space
(four-dimensional space-time) equivalents. Theodor Kaluza’s (1921) cut transformation and four-
transformation can then be applied to these tensor equations to yield normal equations of motion in
three-dimensional space.
Or we can revert to Euclidean flat geometry Newtonian solutions and instead use the Lorentz
equation for calculating electromagnetic forces or the Heaviside equation for calculating the total
gravitational forces on material bodies. Since space and time are now split apart and considered
separately, we can further break down the physics for the microscopic world of the quantum realm
(discrete points rather than extensions and thus non-relative) where space and time can be
considered Euclidean flat (by default) within our three-dimensional surface and thus not

5
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

contributing directly to quantum events, yielding Heisenberg’s equations for the Uncertainty
Principle in which time variable is suppressed (but not hidden) in the first equation and the space
variable (position) is suppressed (but not hidden) in the second equation. Since space and time are
unnaturally split apart at the individual points of space, the Heisenberg equations yield
indeterministic answers that merely represent likelihoods and possibilities in a point-absolute space
and a point-absolute time rather than the relativistic and deterministic real extension space-time that
is natural to our world.
And finally, Erwin Schrodinger’s wave or  equation comes into play as a description of the
probability distributions in the point absolute space-time in which  can be collapsed by either
consciousness (a willful act of conservation or interaction) or entanglement (natural interactions)
with the probabilities  and *, which together yield . When the wave function or  is collapsed,
by what ever method, it is essentially localized from its two-dimensional probabilistic dispersion (
and *) to a fixed value in a discrete point in real relative extended space-time continuum. Thus,
unification is complete except for an explanation and inclusion of consciousness and its overall role
in physical reality.
The role of consciousness is hinted at in the simple fact that this graphic of the unified field
theory looks coincidentally like the Kabbalistic tree of life. The graphic thus implies a direct role of
life, mind and consciousness in the very point structure of the universe.

6
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

This association gives a whole new meaning to the medieval question of whether God is immanent
or transcendent, only in this case it refers to the possibility of some form or concept of a possible
Cosmic Consciousness that could be both immanent and transcendent simultaneously.
Our reality consists of one single continuous field of potential that occupies four-dimensional
space but breaks down in our experiential (the three-dimensional curved surface that we occupy)
into the matter, material bodies, energy, waves and normal force fields (electromagnetic and
gravitogravnetic) with which we are familiar according to geometrical and quantum conditions and
limits. At least this is the way that we see and interpret the world around us. But this is an entirely
three-dimensional interpretation of reality. From the higher perspective of the fourth dimension of
space in a five-dimensional space-time, our three-dimensional world would appear to be nothing but
pure single field except for the complex four-dimensional density variation patterns that correspond
to the paschal ‘things’ that we sense, observe or detect in our three-dimensional world.
From the four-dimensional perspective our external reality would ‘look’ a bit different as noted
in the following breakdown of the SOFT, or table which shows the relationships between forces and
‘things’ from a different four-dimensional perspective.

The electric E-field occupies all dimensions in three-dimensional space and is thus static
(unchanging over time unless another E-field intervenes). The magnetic B-field occupies only two
of the three-dimensions of normal space, but it varies over time, so it occupies all three dynamically
while only two statically. However, magnetism also has a vector potential A (the A-field) which gives
the magnetic field a component in four-space, such that it is three-dimensional in a combined three-
dimensional in all four dimensions.
Gravity is nearly the same, except that it is such a weak force that we seldom, and only in
extreme conditions, have any observable evidence or data on the gravnetic portion of the overall
field. Thus, gravnetism is the “Dark” cousin of normal gravity that we know well in our daily lives.
Our material bodies and all material bodies are me-field patterns of single field density that appear
as quantized patterns of spatial curvature relative to our three-dimensional space such that the me-
field occurs all three-dimensions in three-dimensional space. The DM-field occupies only two of the
7
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

three dimensions of normal space and is a point force, while the DE-field is also a point element
corresponding to the DM-field, the DE is along the fourth direction of the five-dimensional single
field, so like the B- and A-fields are together three-dimensional the DM- and DE-fields are together
three-dimensional, but only in four-space. These finer points are important because they are true for
all material objects, including both living and non-living, animate and inanimate matter. The only
difference between animate and inanimate matter is the degree or level of complexity, a special
complexity of matter that we call ‘life’, so each of these fields must be accounted for in all living
organisms and entities.
It is commonly agreed by most scientists that the universe began with a ‘big bang’ although that
description was originally meant to insult the concept. The Big Bang is predicted by relativity theory
as well as extrapolated from observations made by Edwin Hubble in 1929. In truth, none of our
physical theories can really say anything about the Big Bang because it began with a singularity
(predicted), which is an infinity of mothing, and all our theories are about measurements of
somethings. So, the real question is how nothing becomes something and then explode (expand very
rapidly) into a very large something made up of a seemingly infinite number of other somethings
(particles).
At first the singularity merged from the absolute Void and it eventually morphed into a 0-D
point Void whose only quality was its virtual three-dimensionality. But that ‘thing’ or ‘something’
was able to differentiate itself from the absolute Void from which if emerged, a sort of primal-
awareness, so it tried to implode or fold back into the Void by twisting into itself. It failed because it
was virtually three-dimensional, and the original Void was dimensionless. So, it duplicated itself in
both directions of a fourth dimension creating positive and negative virtual torques, which
rebounded back into the 0-D point/twist Void instead, duplicating the 0-D point/twists in each of
the three-dimensions of space in both the positive and negative directions. After the next moment
of time, the process repeated itself for ach of the newly created duplicable particles and continued to
do so ad Infinium, causing rapidly increasing cosmic inflation.

8
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Obviously, SOFT can account for this and specifically explains in a perfectly logical manner how the
Big Bang occurred and caused the cosmic inflation that supposedly gave us our present universe in a
manner that completely matches observations and our data about the universe.
From the Big Bang until cosmic inflation ended, all that existed was a geometrically structured
Void of 0-D point/twist Voids, a virtually physical nothing in that everything existing added to a
value of zero, but a very big nothing. This structured Void was virtually three-dimensional with a
four-dimensional point-by-point virtual torque (positive above the original three-dimensional virtual
surface and negative below it) and a point-by-point primal-awareness of its differentiation from the
absolute Void from which it all emerged an infinite (undefined) amount of time earlier. Cosmic
inflation then ended with a Big Blowout in positions in the three-dimensional surface of the rapidly
geometrically structured Void that had developed quantum fluctuations (spots of nothingness
between 0-D point/twist Voids which composed the structured Void). These first Blowout spots or
locations became protons, and only protons, since they only blew outward in the direction of
expansion and not inward, which would have created anti-protons.
In all, the Big Blowout created the universe as we know it and slowed cosmic inflation down to
approximately the expansion speeds that we observe today. All in all, the Blowout created
1) Particles, protons, electrons, neutrinos;
2) Energy, light and speed of light as max speed of transmission/translation;
3) Compactification inward vastly slowed or ended inflation with the Cosmic
Microwave Background;
4) Virtual torques in fourth direction of space collectively coalesced (became
physically real) to become single potential field; And,
5) The primal-awareness associated with each 0-D point/twist Void collectively
coalesced to become a semi-physical pre-consciousness potential field.
The virtual torques in the positive and negative fourth directions of space became the single
potential field upon the end of cosmic inflation, with the primary three-dimensional surface (our
world) the densest packed of all surfaces. Surface density thus decreased from the primary surface
outward into the fourth dimension until the single-pole point is reached where the density goes to
zero, with the three-dimensional surfaces stacked like pages in a book, and then returns to the
bottom side of the primary sheet as density increases again in the negative direction for the single-
pole point. These infinitesimally thin three-dimensional surfaces group together in quantum sized
‘sheet’ of sheaf, such that each ‘sheet’ from the primary ‘sheet’ (which represents quantum number
n=1) outward doubling in forth-dimensional field density. Quantizing the fourth dimension of space
according to the density of the single field in the fourth direction of space, automatically quantizes
curvature and our three-dimensional space.

A new order and level of evolution

But the Big Blowout also created a semi-physical pre-consciousness potential field as the collective
aggregation of all the infinite number 0-D point/twist Void’s quality of primal-awareness. This pre-
consciousness potential field pushes, forces or influences the continuing development of order and
orderly systems in our universe despite its opposite, the steadily increasing entropy, which is
ultimately due to continuing outward expansion/inward contraction. In all reality, the amount of

9
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

disorder or entropy in the universe is equal and opposite to the amount of order or complexity in
the universe when all things are considered.
However, emphasizing the special role of order in the universe requires a change in the laws of
thermodynamics which stress only the functioning influence of disorder of entropy. So, we need to
add four new laws to thermodynamics to the exiting four laws to balance the scales: (4) Prigogine’s
principle that an equilibrium system that loses energy will enter a period of increasing chaos until a
reaches a level where it forms a new more stable equilibrium at a lower energy level; (5) Chaos
theory which requires the emergence of complex systems from chaotic origins of a material system
when outside forces and conditions reach a certain level or point, such that the emergent
complexity has new characteristics that could not have been predicted from the initial conditions
that created it to internally itself for its continued development; (6) Prigogine’s principle and chaos
theory taken together create a new ‘evolution of physical systems’, such that the new levels or
stability created (complexities) at lower energies will continue to grow and evolve into still higher
level systems and complexity systems of systems; And, (7) Murphy’s law which state that anything
that can go wrong will go wrong, which introduces a bit of probability or indeterminism is the sense
of quantum theory.
Then, according to these new laws and principles of thermodynamics evolution is natural to
everything in the universe, whether it is animate or inanimate, living or non-living, and life can and
will emerge at a specific level of chemical complexity, depending on how anyone person defines life.
All life will then exhibit life, mind and consciousness at some level. Moreover, organic and bio-
chemistry formed in the primordial soup under the correct conditions of not just the chemical
interactions but a combination of the electromagnetic and even the gravitogravnetic forces, before
life emerged according to Darwinian theory.

As life became more and more complex, it slowly increased within its own complexity (as single cell
animals and conglomerations of single cell animals) to the point where a complexity of mind
emerged creating multi-celled animals (the Cambrian Explosion) which are bicameral (due to the
positive/negative duality of electric field) and then plants diverged with the emergence of a

10
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

complexity of form as opposed to animals’ complexity of function which resulted in the

development of neurons and brains.
Homo sapiens emerged within the Hominid linage three-hundred thousand years ago when a
special memory complexity of mind led to a new higher level of development of consciousness, our
present level of human consciousness, such that Homo sapiens has inherited a vastly more complex
and larger brain than its predecessors that has allowed us to conceptualize and abstract the world
around us so that we may individually or someday collectively reach and even higher level of
consciousness in a new evolutionary leap forward. It is as if the universe in its wholeness is evolving
us, or at least involved in our evolutionary path to such an extent that we can conclude that our
purpose in the world is to evolve the universe from within by adding our experiences and knowledge
to its own because the universe is unable to cognize and realize itself externally as it has nothing to
compare itself to. So, consciousness is not only not epiphenomenal but also present to one level or
another in all life.
This knowledge now allows us to look at the SOFT field structure in a whole new way that
allows us to explain and understand a whole now group of phenomena dealing with life, mind and
consciousness.

To begin with, anomalous phenomena, as investigated by a few scientists and practiced by a few
experiencers and trained individuals, are truly para-normal (normal being three-dimensional), but still
natural, just natural to the higher embedding fourth dimension of space. Life, or what some
scientists call the biofield, is externally stable but internally varying energy/matter pattern of
quantized curvature of space that we regard as or corresponds to our material body. Our mind is the
overall electrical E-field complexity pattern that overlays the em-field or life complexity pattern.
This includes all electrical activity in the body including everything from the movement of individual
atomic and molecular ions in and out of individual cells all the way up to the electrical activity in the
neural nets and the brain. We only think that mind is in the brain because the complex neural nets

11
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

that eventually give rise to whole-brain coherence and cognition, our waking thoughts and streams
of thought, are only located in the brain.

The paranormal, psi and the higher self

Our consciousness is thus the unbelievably vast complexity structure of memories and thoughts
that have built up over eons and untold numbers of generations of animals before us. These are
stored magnetically in the very discrete points of space (0-D point/twists) that coincide with our
bodies and brains, three-dimensionally in the B-field and four-dimensionally in the A-field. The B-
field consciousness is that part of consciousness which we are normally aware of and coincides
directly with the electrical activity of the brain and body. It is our mundane or lower conscious by
which we picture ourselves of ‘self’ three-dimensionally. However, the third dimension of our
consciousness is that which is extended in the fourth direction of space and that is our ‘higher’
consciousness or higher self.
This duality of consciousness goes a long way in explaining and allowing us to understand not
only the world around us in its own great complexities but also ourselves in a way in which we have
never been able to understand ourselves in the past, because that A-field consciousness is in direct
contact with the wholeness and oneness of the universe at all times as well as everything, every
individual part of the universe, through the single-pole where everything comes together. People
who have NDEs experience this part of their consciousness directly as do people who have reached
spiritual/mystical enlightenment, and this is the part of consciousness that survives death of the
body, mind and lower consciousness. Death is merely the simultaneous disruptions of the me-, E
and B-field structures that we all are, but it cannot disrupt the A-field. Both the A-field and DE-field
are four-dimensional and thus directly connected within the life body, which means that higher-
consciousness can access Dark Energy for manipulation of three-dimensional objects and ‘things’,
which easily explains many characteristics of paranormal phenomena.
For example, everything in the universe is both three-dimensional and four-dimensional
simultaneously. Where we normally see and observe something as three-dimensional, we know,
intuitively, that is still has a four-dimensional component that we cannot logically explain.
Everything that we experience, perceive and ‘observer’ in three-dimensional has a four-dimensional
counterpart. The DeBroglie pilot wave is the four-dimensional counterpart of the three-dimensional
Schrödinger -function. The longitudinal electromagnetic wave is the four-dimensional counterpart
of the three-dimensional transverse electromagnetic wave. Our mundane ‘lower’ (B-field)
consciousness or spiritual ‘lower self’ has a counterpart in four-dimensional space which is our
‘higher’ (A-field) consciousness of ‘higher or true self’ that the mystics speak about.
Now let’s look at the various interpretations of the single- and/or double-slit experiment. It can
be conducted with electromagnetic waves (classical optics), photons (modern quantum) or high-
speed electrons (modern quantum) to confirm the wave/particles duality of our reality. Non-
coherent photons do not interfere with each other. So, the observers split a single photon into two
equivalent photons with half the energy that are guaranteed coherent and can thus interfere with
each other creating an interference pattern on the screen, or so modern quantum scientists think.
That interpretation is true but only in their three-dimensional interpretation of the results. There
may be two seemingly separate three-dimensional photons, but the photons have not been
completely separated into two via the fourth dimension because their pilot wave is still intact as one.

12
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Now when Dean Radin’s and other ‘psychics’ concentrate on the experiment they do so with
both their three-dimensional B-field and four-dimensional A-field consciousness, but their four-
dimensional A-field consciousness fixes the four-dimensional DeBroglie wave so that they are
looking at two-halves of one photon in three-dimensional space with three-dimensional eyes and
equipment and there is not interference because a photon cannot interfere with itself. Both
experiments, although seemingly incompatible with one another, are valid as they stand. In other
words, there are two different results and interpretations of the slit experiment because both groups
are using outmoded and outdated incomplete three-dimensional interpretations of the slit
experiment. There are many areas where normal and paranormal science do not agree, but they can
be accommodated and explained for the most part by SOFT.
On of the first beliefs that must change is the common picture that out mind and consciousness
exist in the brain alone, and the human brain at that. We only think that we are ion our brains
because the neural-nets where conscious thoughts and memories first arise in the brain are far more
complex than any other neural structures anywhere else in the body. In fact, complex neural nets
only occur in the brain and they form the various components of the brain that give rise to whole-
brain coherence or cognition, what we recognize as thoughts and streams of thought. The heart has
more neurons and thus has a much stronger magnetic field associated with it than the brain. Our
gut, what scientists are now calling our second brain, also has a very high density of neurons and
thus a stronger magnetic field that other parts of the body.
Only the A-field that is associated with individual discrete points in space extends into the
fourth dimension of space past the material spatial curvature pattern of life of the body. So, the A-
field pattern of a person’s ‘higher’ consciousness acts like an antenna, picking up signals and
information from the rest of the universe, all the time without stopping.

This cacophony of extra-dimensional input and information would simply overwhelm our brains
under ordinary conditions, so it is generally damped or cut out altogether by the neural nets and
their structure where consciousness first emerges in the brain, so very nearly all the information
from the universe never enters our brain and can thus never become a thought.
This neural net or natural filter is a matter of self-preservation and protection from being
mentally overwhelmed, except under the most exceptional of conditions. And then it would seem

13
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

like a random event or blip of memory that our mind would filter out through other neural circuits
and their inherent energy barriers. If, on occasion, they do rise to the level of coherent thought
(through a system of ‘pattern matching in the neural nets) when they seem to fit the context of other
thoughts in our brain or events in our lives (the patterns in our brain being matched to the outside
four-dimensional pattern at large in the universe), they are deemed to be intuition and/or ‘gut
feelings’, visions, and random ESP events such as telepathy, precognition and clairvoyance.
So, in a very real sense, our ‘higher’ consciousness or spiritual ‘higher self’ is the sensory organ
by which we sense the general wholeness and oneness of the universe (also through ‘pattern
matching’) and all that is in it, even though our five-normal three-dimensional senses observe that
we are individuals separate, distinct, unconnected from other ‘things’ in the universe and the
universe is made up of ‘parts’. We only learn through practice (schooling) and/or experience, no
matter what else we are, we are learning machines, which alters the neural net structure in our brains
constantly.
The more intense and profound the learning experience, the greater the alteration in our neural
net structure, but the more easily it is to assimilate any new information of experiences. So that
when we learn to use our ‘sixth sense’ or have an intense NDE or even reach satori and nirvana
during meditation (or naturally), we gain new abilities and our personalities change permanently due
to the neural net requiring and repeating the experiences also becomes easier. For example, we lose
our fear of death after NDEs because are brains have been rewired at the neural net level for more
immediate contact with the higher dimension and thus to accept the reality that consciousness
survives death. We also become more spiritual after these experiences and though proper learning
concerning our true reality.
Spirituality is no more nor less than a person’s natural recognition of our intimate connection
with everything (all points in the universe through the single-polar point) and the undivided
continuous wholeness of the universe (the maximum possible extension) simultaneously and thus a
primary characteristic of our ‘higher’ self or consciousness (the A-field). Religion does not create
spirituality, but rather spirituality created religion as our consciousness and mind at a much earlier
time in the history of our species sought to understand ourselves, the world around us and our place
in the world around us. It is safer and more accurate to believe that true spirituality is completely
independent of religion and we, as individuals, out spirituality into our religious beliefs rather than
get spirituality from our experience and learning of any religion, as it is taught to us.
Just as we mistakenly believe that mind and consciousness are in our brains and heads, we also
mistakenly believe that our ‘high self’ or ‘higher’ consciousness just floats above our head and/or
surrounds us. We think as if a little clod called our ‘true self’ floats just above our heads and follows
us around everywhere we go, or that there are angels sitting on our shoulders or just behind us, out
of our vision. All religions picture their holy people and icons with the bright light above and just
behind them, as halos of light just above their heads, or even as bright light surrounding the head
and/or the whole person. The concept of light being associated with the ‘higher’ consciousness is
true, although greatly misconstrued by religions and creeds. Our ‘higher’ consciousness is extended
into the higher embedding fourth dimensions of space from very point in our bodies. Technically
matter and material objects do not exist in the higher fourth dimension because they are but
curvature in the three-dimensional surface of our bodies and experiential space. But the higher
dimension would be filled everywhere with ‘light’. or at least with the four-dimensional extension of
three-dimensional light waves, i.e., photons and virtual photons, which our three-dimensional biased

14
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

minds interpret as normal white light. So, where exactly is our higher consciousness and our what
remains of ‘physical’ body after death, when only the three-dimensional material body dies?

We sense that our ‘higher’ consciousness or ‘self’ is above us, which technically is true none-the-less
confusing. It is only above us four-dimensionally (above the three-dimensional curvature surface
complexity pattern corresponding to out biological body) but we are not yet above to think four-
dimensionally and our lifetime three-dimensionally biased mind ‘thinks’ above without regard to
dimensionality, at least when we are revived from the NDE or similar experience. I the three-
dimensional sense the ghost or spirit is in us (in the points of space that our body occupies) until we
die, and only then is it above us four-dimensionally. So, NDErs picture their memory of the out-of-
body experience associated with the NDE as above their body floating free in the air.
Accordingly, the best evidence for this model of consciousness comes from NDEs and
spiritual/mystical enlightenment because these result in real neural net changes that affect people in
verifiable ways. Anyone who has fully experienced an NDE or spiritual enlightenment has directly
experienced and touched our naked reality, the full physical experience of true reality, without the
blinders of our normal three-dimensional psychological window dressing of materiality. So,
experiencers can only offer stories that are too many times anecdotal and metaphorical because
there are no three-dimensional concepts and vocabulary to describe them, of directly experiencing
an extended reality that very well matches what has so far been theoretically deduced about the
fourth-embedding dimension of material space and its relationship to the normal three-dimensional
space we commonly experience.
So, we could picture all paranormal and mystical phenomena as existing on a line of intensity −
The Spectrum of NDLEs or Near Death-Like Experiences − which blot out and overcome our
three-dimensional prejudices and biases but at the same time utilizes them to distinguish between
different experiences that we might encounter.

15
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Along this line, we are measuring or comparing the ability of a person’s ‘higher’ consciousness or
‘true self’ to influence his or her waking mind and brain by bringing memories or thoughts of the
higher-dimensional experience to the level of whole-brain coherence at will.
A much grander, all-inclusive and more comprehensive view of the totality of our universe, its
simultaneous wholeness and oneness despite all the separate parts that make it up, can still be made.
We can experience NDEs, enlightenment and other paranormal experiences and we can even enter
death without knowing the physics or nature of what has occurred, without understanding the
physics of the universe at an academic level, but knowing the physics greatly enhances the
experience and might even help a person reach still higher levels of consciousness, where we can
manipulate ‘things’ in the higher dimension. Knowing the physics gives us a better experience and
can help us control our ‘higher’ consciousness to its own benefit and knowing and understanding
how the universe works, through a better enhanced and unified physics, can also be of help. In fact,
it is possible to reach a certain level of ‘enlightenment’ through physics alone, at least the proper
physics alone could place a person, if they are doing the correct physics that more closely matches
the full reality of the universe, closer to a spontaneous enlightenment event in their own
consciousnesses.
At the left end of the chart, we have the everyday mundane personal use of the ‘higher’
consciousness. It is the source of our natural spirituality, intuition, ‘gut feelings’ about things, and
our ‘sixth sense’. It is the source of the things that we know without knowing how we know them.
After that comes ESP and PK, including spontaneous poltergeist effects. These occur randomly and
spontaneously in every person’s mind at one time or another. The problem is recognizing them and
acting on them when they occur. How many people have accidently, without trying to do so, ready
another person’s mind and considered it just a coincidence? Everyone. If a person works with that
spontaneity enough, they might be able to change it to a more promising ability. But on occasion a
person can inherit or be trained to use their natural paranormal abilities as a psychic or medium. Or
even as a remote viewer. These go a step beyond spontaneous events and occurrences and entails
the rewiring of neural nets in the practitioner’s brain through continued practice and learning to
accommodate that learned ability, unless inherited.

The Road to a higher reality

Paranormal events of this type and still others are quite easy to explain within the context of the
higher dimension required by physics and unification in SOFT. Everything in three-dimensional
space has a counterpart, or rather extends in a physical but non-material way, into the higher fourth
dimension of space as was mentioned earlier. Higher consciousness is the primary extension of all

16
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

living organisms into the fourth dimension as is what is mistakenly called Dark Energy (at least as
point potential on the fourth dimension of space).
So, suppose some event occurs non-locally, completely out of a person’s range of normal
senses, such that the observer ‘B’ cannot sense the event ‘A’ or event detect it through other three-
dimensional mechanical means. Both the observer’s higher consciousness and some physically real
part of the event extend into the fourth dimension where the event can still be ‘detected’ through
the mechanism of ‘psi’ by the observer.

Lines A and B extending into the fourth direction of space are parallel but all parallel lines in the
fourth direction meet at the single pole. The speed of light only limits movement on three-
dimensional space, so signal transfer in the fourth dimension is, or can be, instantaneous. However,
events have volume in three-dimensional space as does consciousness, so the quantum limits of
measurement (minimum size) in three-dimensional space allows the event and consciousness
patterns to overlap before they (the points of single field potential that they are made from) can ever
reach the single pole.
Once the patterns begin to overlap, the process of ‘pattern recognition’ begins in the most basic
neural nets in the brain of B and the psi event is cognized by one or more neural nets. These
patterns could be considered four-dimensional holograms that project as part of our physical reality
into our three-dimensional materially curved surface and as such if any part of the hologram is
‘pattern matched’ would mean that the whole hologram is ‘pattern matched’ to a greater or lesser
degree. Although if only a small part is ‘pattern matched’ the ‘image or matching would be fuzzier.
However, this is a random probability occurrence in nature, part of the background chatter of the

17
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

universe at large among an infinite number of other events and/or only if it is intense enough can it
break free of the background chatter.
First, it must make sense in the context of the mind before could it possibly reach whole-brain-
coherence and waking thought, otherwise it is ignored as background noise in the brain. And
secondly, if it must have of significance, importance or meaning for psychological reasons within any
given person’s personal context of memories and thoughts to reach waking mind. With training and
experience a person can increase that probability and randomness by learning to ‘tune in’ to the
universe (lowering the neural net threshold for ‘pattern recognition’) and develop the ability to beat
the natural order and develop their natural ‘psychic’ abilities.
The signal (knowledge) between the sender (event) and receiver (consciousness of observer)
thus seems to be instantaneous and does not attenuate, like a three-dimensional electromagnetic
wave or gravity, over three-dimensional distance. A person who has reached higher consciousness
(spiritual enlightenment) or otherwise experienced it directly (a strong NDEr), or even a person
more practiced in sensing the paranormal would have a higher conscious (waking) presence
(awareness of extension of consciousness) into the higher dimension and could therefore be better
at ‘pattern matching’ and initiate the process by willful intent.

The person must be able or be aware enough to consciously utilize the specific neural net pattern or
system in their own brain that allows them to extend their higher consciousness into the fourth
dimension at will and recognize that he or she is doing so, or at least recognize that they are using
their higher consciousness is some specific manner in some specific higher-dimensional purpose as
practice and/or experience has taught them. This can be called ‘projection’ of consciousness to
initiate ‘pattern matching’ for a specific purpose.
This form of ‘projection’ of one’s ‘higher self’ beyond normal and natural limits to correlate and
overlap with some other event or consciousness to gain knowledge of that event or consciousness
can go two ways: (1) In the case of ESP, clairvoyance, precognition and other common paranormal
events, the primary three-dimensional aspects of higher consciousness (B) project awareness to a
different parallel three-dimensional surface just ‘above’ the event or consciousness as shown above.
This normally happens randomly and spontaneously but can be practiced and the effect in the brain

18
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

strengthened to be used later according to willful intent; And, (2) In the case of remote viewing, PK
and even healing a person’s higher consciousness is extended four-dimensionally in the higher
dimension and projected three-dimensionally to the actual event (A) in our three-dimensional world.
PK and healing differ in that the extended higher consciousness A creates energy (Dark Energy)
from single field potential in our primary three-dimensional reality by a method like ‘pattern
matching’ termed ‘frequency coupling’. No energy is transferred across space and time, in ay
dimension, since the interaction is completely outside of the same three-dimensional surface or the
same three-dimensional quantum ‘sheet’ of parallel surfaces. As a rule, these interactions cannot
occur across the same surface of ‘sheet’ as that would invoke the three-dimensional laws of physics,
i.e., signal transfer limited to the speed of light, that prohibit such action/reaction events from
occurring naturally.
Similar geometric theories of this above type have been developed by other scientists. The most
successful was developed by Elizabeth Rauscher. Her model is described as an eight-dimensional
metric which is more commonly known as ‘complex Minkowski space’. She has shown that this
model is consistent with our present understanding of the equations of Newton, Maxwell, Einstein,
and Schrödinger. It also has the interesting property of matching local phenomena to non-local
phenomena, as happens in paranormal phenomena, by allowing a connection of zero distance
between points in the complex manifold, even though they appear to be different (local versus non-
local) according to ordinary three-dimensional observations.
In each case, whether the observers are consciousness observing non-local events paranormally
or not, they all require some form of communication between two parallel four-dimensional space-
time surfaces, sheets, branes, or portions of our universe suspended in five-dimensional bulk (many
times undefined) of some sort. These and similar eight-dimensional theories (double four-
dimensional space-times) have a history dating back to the late nineteenth century when the
American astronomer Simon Newcomb developed a hypothetical universe with two three-
dimensional surfaces with a separate time, separated by the luminiferous aether, to explain
Michelson’s negative results to detect the luminiferous aether using an interferometer. In many
cases, these geometries use either quaternions or octonions in their mathematical calculations. Or, in
the case of W.K. Clifford, biquaternions. Quaternions, as a four-dimensional algebra, seem quite
suited to this task.
Others have similar models. William Tiller’s model is based upon an eight-dimensional
framework for space-time. Our normal four-dimensional space-time is ‘electric monopole
constituted,’ or rather coarse matter is based on electrical forces. The notion that common matter is
based upon electrical forces is not new in Tiller’s theory but predates both the quantum and
relativity theories. But Tiller also postulates a finer level of reality that is constituted by four added
dimensions that Tiller calls a second ‘reciprocal subspace.’ Any real physical measurement contains
elements from both subspaces. This reciprocal subspace is ‘magnetic-monopole written.’ In this
other realm, normal physical laws such as the speed limit of light do not apply, so information
transfer can occur at much higher speeds than matter can. Tiller uses a mathematical system of
quaternions to explain his model and how it worked in the real world.
On the other hand, during the 1990s superstring theory expanded to include multiple-
dimensioned strings in order to unify the five major single-dimensional string models into one
unified model. These were called ‘brane’ models, where ‘brane’ a just shortened form of ‘membrane’
which replaced the non-quantum notion of parallel surfaces as used in relativity. The theoretical

19
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

model was then further expanded by Lisa Randall and Randall Sundrum in 1999. In the first of their
two models, called RS1, in which there is only finite distance for the extra dimension between the
two branes, but in the second model, RS2, where the two branes are placed infinitely far away so
that only the primary brane need be considered as physically active. The distance between the
branes, between which mythical gravitons travel, guarantees that the force of gravity is ultra-weak
compared to the strength of the electromagnet field, thus solving the hierarchy problem. All these
theories can be easily incorporated into the SOFT model for a very simple reason.
These various theories require some form of a five-dimensional embedding bulk, even though
none of these theories attempts to define the bulk beyond giving it the name “bulk”. But SOFT is a
theory of the bulk that includes an infinite number of parallel four-dimensional space-time surfaces,
branes or whatever others call them, within a closed embedding higher space. These other
theoreticians are only looking at bits, pieces and specialized portions of the overall unification
accomplished by SOFT.
The Randall-Sundrum model is even alternately known as a ‘five-dimensional warped geometry
theory’ because they describe the world in terms of a warped geometry higher-dimensional universe
(known as the bulk), or more commonly called a five-dimensional anti-de Sitter space in which the
elementary particles (except the graviton), as represented in the quantum Standard Model of point
particles (instead of local continuum curvature), are all localized on the primary four-dimensional (a
split quantum three-dimensional space plus one-dimensional time) brane. The points of difference
here expressed between the Randall-Sundrum model (word differences with relativity theory in
parentheses) indicate exactly how that model can be subsumed into the SOFT model. As such, the
Randall-Sundrum model is the only model of this type that is acceptable, to one degree or another,
within normal scientific community. At least it is not considered a form of ‘alternative’ physics by
the scientific community, even though the other models that are quite like it are considered
‘alternative’ physics. Yet all these models can easily be shown to fit into (and probably subsumed by)
the more comprehensive SOFT model with just a few modifications.

Healing and manipulating ‘subtle energy’

Remember that consciousness is a whole-body point-by-point magnetic field complexity
pattern. The complexity is in the very single field points that your body occupies. Therefore, healing
would entail using an ideal and/or healthy pattern stored in ‘higher’ consciousness (A in the above
diagram) to ‘pattern match’ and effect the consciousness pattern and therefore the immune system
(which is also a whole-body effect) of the person being healed (B in the above diagram). As a point-
by-point pattern, four-dimensional higher consciousness normally acts through lower conscious, to
mind, to brain (intuition and gut feelings) and then body, but it can also directly interact with the
body at the body’s lowest recognizable biological pattern structure or magnetic domain level, which
would be the individual cells that make up the living body, all the way up to the whole, as well as and
with any portion of the body by tuning into its unique and specific magnetic field structure or
signature.
Individual cells interact and communicate with each other by swapping biophotons at the
molecular level and these biophotons play an important role in the E-field, B-field and A-field
complexity patterns of mind and consciousness. They also create cellular domain level memories
that are an integral and vital part of subliminal consciousness that forms a natural pathway for higher
consciousness to take advantage of later. This pathway gives higher consciousness a way to interact

20
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

with the whole-body through its cells. The ‘subtle energy’, Chi, Ki or Prana, that marital arts,
philosophers and medical practitioners speak of is no more than the conscious utilization or
manipulation of single field potential (called Dark Energy in astronomy and cosmology) collectively
through points in the body.

Since this represents magnetic vector potential or the A-field distribution throughout the body, a
direct relationship between a Chi flow chart, the magnetic field of the body and the chakras is easy
to see. The body, when considered as a continuous unbreakable whole rather than a sum of its parts,
has a single continuous magnetic field (center drawing), or rather the continuous collective magnetic
effect relative to the outside world. But each organ in the body also has its own unique magnetic
field structure. And those magnetic domains continue all the way down to the individual cells.
The heart has the strongest magnetic B-field even though the brain has the most complex B-
field domain structure, so the heart rules the overall collective magnetic B-field structure of the
whole body and thus is closely connected to a person’s ‘higher’ consciousness than even the brain.
That could be why we do not more readily perceive our higher consciousness until we directly
experience it in some manner, for instance through NDEs and spiritual enlightenment. It is easy to
see that the Hindu yoga chakras are points in the body where major organ’s magnetic axes cross the
central collective axis of the whole-body’s magnetic field, and the chi flow and acupuncture points
also follow the magnetic map of the body. These charts are healing aids that Eastern medical
practitioners use that also demonstrates how the heart and higher consciousness can interact directly
with the body when medically treating the body of the practitioner (immune system) or another
person, which is to use the overall magnetic field to alter and manipulate the immune system of the
body being treated.

We survive death
There is no such thing as ‘life’ after death unless you consider reincarnation, which is more a
case of life after life, and NDEs do not ‘prove’ that life survives death. NDEs merely give people a
three-dimensional look at the four-dimensional afterlife and our true reality. When ‘life’ ends, no
matter whether we are speaking about biological materialistic life or the biofield, ‘life force’, me-field
or whatever we want to call that ‘something extra’ that is ‘life’ beyond the biological maintenance of

21
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

the bio-mechanical body, the body dies as do the other purely three-dimensional aspects of ‘life’ (the
me-field), mind (E-field) and the lower consciousness (B-field) complexity structures of a person
almost immediately upon death. Biological death is the end of life. The biofield (me-field) begins to
decay, just as the mind complexity pattern loses control over the electrical impulses that make up the
E-field and decays and the corresponding B-field decays to the individual uncoordinated (due to
complexity field decay) and scattered electrical impulses still active after death. However, the higher-
consciousness or four-dimensional A-field complexity pattern does not break down and thus
survives three-dimensional death of the body/life/mind and three-dimensional B-field portion of
consciousness.
The surviving A-field complexity pattern of single field potential forms the surviving ‘body’ or
spirit as a highly complex single field density complexity pattern due to its ultra-higher-level stability.
But be that as it may, the A-field carries within its own single field structure, as complex as it is, the
lower level virtual B-field and E-field complexity patterns in the form of its stored memories. The
A-field becomes a template for the E-field mind and B-field in three-dimensional space, reversing
the order by which it had previously developed and adding its own self and knowledge to the overall
universe. So, the A-field or higher-consciousness can reconstruct at least the mind and mundane
consciousness of a person whenever it ‘wants’ to interact with our three-dimensional surface or
commonly experienced world and it would be this A-field pattern that is active in reincarnations
with the ‘life’ of as yet unborn babies. We cannot call what is left of us, our A-field higher
consciousness complexity pattern, after we die ‘life’, but it is the end product of our having lived. It
is everything we were imprinted into the single field and thus part of the extended universe filled by
the singe continuous field.
However, the state and condition of this surviving ‘higher self’ or ‘spirit’ depends completely on
the mental state, true knowledge and overall level of that knowledge, and psychic characteristics of a
person’s mind/consciousness while living and especially circumstances at the time and of death. In
other words, we create our own heaven, hell or limbo depending upon a type of ‘karma’ that we
ourselves developed and grown by our own actions and deeds during our lives. This ‘karma’ is ruled
or guided by one and only one general rule on how to conduct oneself during life to build good
‘karma’ which increases the presence and awareness of your ‘self’ after you die and that is to do what
enhances the universe and cosmos in its wholeness (the single field connection of everything with
everything else). We open ourselves (form compassionate connections) to others, people and living
entities, and love (connect our higher consciousness with others) as much as we can, we do not hate
(which is breaking the higher-dimensional connections and insulating our true ‘self’ from others)
others or spread hate.
We carry our love and compassion (the higher connections we form) into death and they help
establish new extra-dimensional connections after death, while our hate insulates us from connecting
and making and new connections after death. The greater our hate and he more people that our hate
touches during life and especially in the moment of death, the more hell-like the afterlife is made by
each individual for him or herself. And, of course, we do everything that we can to increase our level
of consciousness while living, so that we will have some idea (implicit or explicit) of what to expect
when we die and the transition between states and dimensions can be completed more readily and
effectively. If we add to the universe’s knowledge and awareness of itself by being more conscious
during life, and the universe pays that back to us, our higher consciousness or self, after we die.

22
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

The endgame approaches

But what does this all mean? The whole of existence cannot just be about us, our existence and
our supposedly (but not really) accidental awareness of reality. It means that if we work with the
universe in this manner, the universe will work with us even before we die and the only way that the
universe can do that is through evolution and the further application of the semi-physical pre-
consciousness potential field to continually increase our level of consciousness. We already know
that we can advance ourselves individually by evolving our own consciousness in the hope that a
higher level of consciousness (spiritual enlightenment) will emerge in each of us. But as each drop of
water increases the level of the ocean imperceptibly in a way that we never notice and never even
consider, each individual consciousness that increases its level of consciousness also increases the
collective consciousness of the Hominid species as a collective whole.
We increase individual consciousness by learning what is the truth of our reality in all aspects of
life and especially what is true about the universe itself, which implies learning and practicing
science, and by experiencing the wholeness and oneness of the universe as best we can which
implies studying yoga, Tai Chi and other whole-body forms of moving meditation as well as
traditional meditation (to enhance whole-brain functioning) and deliberate wellness practices. If
done properly, these experiential practices prepare the brain (through plasticity of neural nets) and
body (through more efficient cellular communication and direct cooperation with consciousness),
which affects our genomes to pass the good in us onward, to more efficiently and effectively pass
the increased level of consciousness onto the next generation of Hominids.
This means that the more we learn about the world, true knowledge of the world and not just
opinion and partially factual data and science, the more intelligent we become about interacting with
others, the world and the universe, and the more we increase our individual levels of consciousness,
the closer we come, as a species, to a new leap in evolution. To this extent, we have now pretty
much filled, if not overfilled, those marvelous larger and more complex brains, that nature gave us to
fill three-hundred millennia ago. This fact not only means we are on the cusp of a new scientific
revolution that will again be led by physics and the consciousness that perceives and interprets the
world as scientific and natural, a fact that is obvious to many scientists and academics, but also on
the cusp of a new evolutionary leap which will end Homo sapiens in favor of Homo paradoxus.
The new species, our children and our children’s children, will be an evolutionary paradox
because we will still be materially three-dimensional creatures, but we will be able to think and act in
four-dimensional space since we will be fully cognizant of our higher consciousness and true ‘self’ as
studied and documented in Eastern philosophy, science and medicine. We, the Hominid species, will
be born in the very near future with a fundamental framework pre-established in our neural net
dominated brain structure to easily become spiritually enlightened, if not born fully enlightened. This
moment in our history and evolutionary track must be very close and there already exist a vast
amount of evidence, both hard and circumstantial evidence, that supports this
conclusion/prediction and the period of evolutionary change is probably already upon us.
A large and important part of the circumstantial evidence lies in our own past, including the last
evolutionary jump three hundred millennia ago that gave us larger and more complex brains than
were necessary for our immediate survival. That last leap forward, toward higher consciousness, was
probably mind driven because we had gained enough memories and complexities of memories in the
previous three to five million years of Hominid existence, learning and experience to warrant the

23
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

emphasis and importance of our new larger and more complex brains to work toward the elevation
and development of consciousness through additional learning and experience of the three-
dimensional world and inverse at large relative to that which we were able to intuit through our
higher-dimensional single field continuity with and connections to the wholeness and oneness of the
universe within our newly developed higher consciousness. This ‘event’ guaranteed that the next
step in our evolution will be purely top-down from consciousness to mind to life when our brains
have become filled to their capacity and even beyond necessitating need more room and complexity
to expand any further.
Certain mental markers, the most obvious of which is our abstract concepts of space and time,
both illustrate and tell this story white clearly.

24
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

The sophistication level of our abstract concepts of space and time are indicators, pointers and
signposts to our level of conscious awareness of the world around us and our overall higher
consciousness at any given time in our evolution, so tracking them tells our story of further
evolution beyond the normal birth and emergence of Homo sapiens.
According to this standard, we have now lived through and completed five distinct periods of
our mental evolution since Homo sapiens emerged on this planet and are close to the end of the
sixth period. The passing and completing of these periods has been falling closer together in the
geological scale of time as each level of our mental complexity organizes and rearranges the previous
level more efficiently to better approach the next level. They are: (1) 300,000 to about 100,000 years
ago; (2) 100,000 to about 40,000 years ago; (3) 40,000 to about 650 BCE or about 2700 years ago; (4)
from 650 BCE to 1545 CE or nearly 500 years ago; (5) 1545 to 1900 for a period of a little more
than 350 years; And, (6) finally from about 1900 to the present or a little more than a century.
These periods of time can be characterized by the evolving conceptual abstractions of space
and time in the collective human experience of the external world of reality as: (1) Home sapiens has
not yet differentiated itself or the individual from nature in any way especially way especially in terms
of abstract conceptual terms of space and time except perhaps in a rudimentary fashion; (2) We
develop a holistic concept of space and time, but only begin to differentiate ourselves from the
external world of nature; (3) We differentiate our ‘self’’ and being from nature as individuals and
begin to suspect that ‘change’ in nature is cyclical which is the precursor to abstracting ‘change’ in
spatial position and time as logically important to explain nature and our external world. The first
evidence of a belief in the afterlife appears in the archeological record; (4) This was a period of rapid
fundamental change and mental development that began with the Axial Age, although in the west
this period could be termed the Zeroth Scientific Revolution. Philosophy emerges in place of
outright religion although religion itself takes on new philosophical and political aspects in a larger
part of the world.
The Greek Natural Philosophers of this era first noted that the most common and fundamental
‘thing’ in all of nature was ‘change’ and only later spoke of change in location (space) and time; (5)
Next came the Scientific Revolution and rise of physics itself through Newtonianism from Nicholas
Copernicus (1545) to Isaac Newton (1687). The new Natural Philosophy of mechanical physics
elaborated and clarified the overall human concepts of space and time through reduction for the first
time, at first through advances in theoretical astronomy and then through the abstractions of
absolute space and time as opposed to relative space and time in the mechanistic worldview. Only
relative space and time were necessary to explain the mechanical universe of matter in the new
Natural Philosophy and science of physics; And finally, (6) Albert Einstein initiated the Second
Scientific Revolution by demonstrating that changes in space are not and could not possibly be
independent of changing time and vice versa, thereby binding relative space and time together as a
space-time in the form of a continuous whole, Einstein thus gave the abstract concepts of space and
time a greater meaning and importance in the inner workings of our physical world than they had
ever had before.
Yet, Max Planck’s discovery of the quantum of radiation initiated a conceptual change and
subsequent advances in science that by 1927 founded a quantum theory that split space and time
apart (as defined and required by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle) in the sub-microscopic world
of material reality. This unnatural splitting of space and time has allowed scientists to further
mathematize our common physical reality at a level beyond which we can truthfully observe and

25
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

measure that reality as a measure of the extent to which we can test our external world by
unnaturally separating space and time in the laboratory. From these humble beginnings, scientists
and other academics who make it their business to study and understand nature and the nature of
reality have concluded, faithfully believed and/or at least acted as if modern physics gives us an all
but complete picture of nature and physical reality, and that we are moving into a period in history
when scientists will complete physics based upon the fundamental nature of the quantum.
But the above time table tells a somewhat different and far more comprehensive story of
human past. In reality, the level of scientific accomplishment does not depend on any one specific
theory but instead depends upon our level of consciousness, awareness of our ‘self’ (as interpreter
and observer) and the universe external to us, so the science that we have developed over the past
three millennia is purely three-dimensional even though the existence of a higher-dimensional
embedding space is implied by that same science. Therefore, our present science, in the guise of
modern physics including both relativity theory and quantum theory, are both woefully incomplete.
In other words, the human consciousness as it now understands our reality as observed an
interpreted by the human mind only has a partial and incomplete perception of the universe. There
must therefore be a much larger physical context for the universe that we, as humans, are not yet
quite capable of perceiving through our normal senses. Yet the bigger and more complex brains that
nature gave us as Homo sapiens three-hundred thousand years ago have now been filled to the brim,
they are overflowing, and perhaps even overfilled in some cases, so that many of our western
scientific interpretations of the external material world are looking more and more like very
imaginative science fiction rather than true science. It is clear from this unfortunate turn of events
and can only be concluded that the Homo sapiens species is reaching the functional and capacity
limits of its collective brain.
As this limit is reached, nature would surely ‘notice’ and create a new step ‘upward and forward’
in our evolution which could only be associated with our developing a higher consciousness and that
higher consciousness would surely be accompanied by some physiological changes in the brain. So
modern science, which some now mistakenly believe has already reached an end, has only reached a
three-dimensionally limited plateau before moving to its next level, that would mimic and follow the
natural evolution of our consciousness, in that both science and evolution are moving us toward
cognizing, recognizing and becoming fully aware of a more complete physical reality with respect to
a higher dimension of space.
Science is just beginning to think and reason within the contest of the higher dimension of
space, while we are also beginning to move beyond just our limited innate intuitive knowledge of the
higher dimension to physically manipulate and utilize the higher dimension for purposes of
gathering information and data about our true reality. This higher dimension, the fourth spatial
dimension as inferred by modern physics, will be the new mental playground on which we regularly
and normally experience physical reality after the next step in our evolutionary development. How
do we know this? Because we took the first step in that direction nearly twenty-seven centuries ago
during the so-called Axial Age and we can follow the progress toward that end since then in our
evolving abstract concepts of space and time or space-time (since 1905). We can also see it (we had a
preview of the coming evolutionary leap) in the advances in human collective consciousness that
emerged worldwide during the Axial Age.
There is absolutely no doubt that something very weird that cannot be explained in any other
way happened in the seventh century BCE: We suddenly seem to have start thinking in a completely

26
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

modern way, simultaneously, all over the world. This change in fundamental thought and attitude
has not gone unnoticed by past historians and scholars, although they have not put as much
emphasis on the coincidence of change as the change deserves.

The coincidence of emerging intellectual differences occurring simultaneously in the East and West
was first noticed more than a century ago. Historians and scholars have noted this coincidence of
history, but none have taken it so far as to view it as a major change in collective human history that
amounted to reaching a new level of intellectualism and consciousness. Nor has anyone ever claimed
that the secondary split caused by the Greek development of Natural Philosophy amounted to a
Zeroth Scientific Revolution that last for nearly four centuries, at least until the Roman conquests of
ancient Greece. In China a similar amount of time took the form of a historical period dubbed the
‘Hundred Schools of Thought’ that ended in the Imperial period and in India it corresponded to the
rise and spread of Buddhism down to its maximum influence with the spread of the Ashokan
Empire throughout the Indian subcontinent and beyond.
The Zeroth scientific Revolution in the west, from Thales, Pythagoras and Anaximander to
Aristotle, Euclid and Archimedes ushered in a period of introspection (logical perception and
interpretation of the material world) outward into the external world of reality, while the eastern
equivalent beginning with Lao Tzu and Confucius in China and Gautama and the Vedas in India
began a long period of intersection inward (looking at an intuitive reality of the mind and ‘self’
perceiving the external reality of the world). During and after the Axial Age, East and West pursued
different paths toward their interpretations of and dealing with physical reality. There is absolutely
no doubt, nor can there be any doubt, that East and West developed along two different diverging
lines of thought on human thought, two different fundamental worldviews on how to cope with our
place and role in the external world, that emerged for unknown reasons during the consciousness
awaking events of the Axial Age.
27
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

So East and West have taken two different philosophical and conceptual approaches to the
further development of the human mind and knowledge of the world, our reality, of mind, body and
consciousness. Yet both paths or approaches are equally valid and remain so even though the West
has developed modern physics and other modern scientific advances that go beyond anything in the
East. These two approaches have influenced everything to do with human existence and survival if
the respective areas of the world where they developed, yet neither is right or correct, and neither is
wrong nor incorrect relative to the other and relative to the higher level of consciousness and
conscious awareness that characterizes all Homo sapiens.

While a reductionistic science based on logic, reason and observation of the external world (outside
of the mind) emerged and was further developed in the West, the discipline of science of the East
has been more people-centered, oriented toward the internal intuitive development of mind and
consciousness, this eastern science is subjective and based on intuition with spirituality which
minimizes the influence of purely rational logic. Western science is instead objective and based on
rational logic which minimizes links to intuition and spirituality. Western culture has compensated by
the development of grand religious establishments that rule over individuals, while individual
spirituality (Taoism, Buddhism, Yoga) without such overriding religious institutions has been better,
although not universally, developed in the East. Yet our true reality is one, so these two opposing
views must now come together to give us a more complete and comprehensive view of our
common reality.
Toward this end, we could almost say that the ‘endgame’ for Homo sapiens began with the
Axial Age, and the split in fundamental philosophies and ways of thought (East and West) that

28
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

developed during this period of history. It was not so much a split, but rather a recognition that the
human mind would interpret the external world in two different manners in all its many and
numerous aspects: reduction versus holism in science, the individual versus the collective (state) in
culture and politics, discrete versus continuity in modern physics, point versus extension in geometry
and so on. These dualities are the same in the end, and they rule all human three-dimensional
thought in one way or another.
And this brings us to the Third Scientific Revolution, which has already begun, and during
which Eastern and Western thought will again merge together as something completely new
emerges, but not without birthing pains. Eastern thought, paradigms and practices have helped
reintroduce Western science to its natural innate internal introspection into the observer that
interprets external reality. Western science lost this perspective of internal reality and has failed to
consider how it affects the interpretation of nature and our external world, except for
parapsychology and the physical studies of the paranormal, during the Second Scientific Revolution
which further emphasized to a much higher degree than before materialism and brought
reductionism (through the quantum) into tis most advanced state. The Heisenberg uncertainty
principle reduces the reality of space-time to the uncertainty of space without referring to time and
time without referring to space at the very same discrete points where space and time are bound
together to determine the reality as expressed in a point-absolute indeterministic background space.
What we have found here in the Third Scientific Revolution instead is the pre-physicality and
physicality of the 0-D point/twist Void with its inherent ‘primal awareness’ that collectively yields
the same physical pre-consciousness potential field that directly influences events in relative space-
time. Otherwise, science in the form of psychology lost its mind in 1913 and turned instead to
developing ‘behaviorism’ because it passivistically thought that knowing mind directly was
impossible the same way the physics adopted the present quantum paradigm because scientists
thought that it is impossible to know physical reality directly. So together, the new sciences of mind
and science lost consciousness, which is that one ‘thing-in-itself’ that allows us to experience and
know both mind and physical reality, both simultaneously and independently, as they are “things-in-
themselves”. The only exception to this was those few scientists who dared to study the paranormal
aspects of mind and consciousness, but even they did not completely realize just what they were
studying.
When we put all of this together against the historical background of our evolving sense of
space and time and how we treat them as abstract conceptual realities, we get a pyramid of events
starting three-hundred millennia ago (the base of the pyramid) when Homo sapiens first emerged
The three sides of the pyramid represent the evolution of technology, the evolution of science and
biological evolution toward higher and higher levels of consciousness.

29
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

The apex of the pyramid represents a point in time in the very new future where science undergoes
its Third Scientific Revolution and realizes the importance and significance of a fourth embedding
dimension of space within the context of a full unification of physics and the rest of science. This
occurs almost simultaneously with technology and biological leaps forward, such that our
technology reaches its highest point of evolution and development with the emergence of true
Artificial Intelligence (AI). Commonly referred to as the ‘singularity’, and where human (Hominid)
evolution takes a leap and the Homo sapiens species is replaced at the top of the Hominid line by
Homo paradoxus. This point occurs ‘tomorrow’ on a very sort time scale from today, the present
now.
But what about the birthing pains that precede this occurrance? According to Prigogine’s
principle, when a material and/or physical system moves from one level of stability to another at a
lower energy, the system enters a state of maximum chaos before the new complexity emerges at
lower energy. This fits the emergence of a new higher-level complexity of consciousness, because
awareness of higher consciousness is an energy less process, so as we move toward greeter
consciousness (more mind) with less emphasis on material being (less brain activity or more efficient
brain) we utilize less energy. So, the new evolutionary leap based on increasing consciousness of our
greater world of reality that is coming will be accompanied by physiological changes in the human
brain, i.e., neural net structures, which render the brain and our awareness of the higher dimensions

30
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

of space more efficient and effective. But these changes will not just be internal to mind, they will
have real material consequences in our external mentally derived experience of the material world.
In other words, a systematic state of maximum chaos always happens before a new level of
stability is reached and since we are dealing with mental issues, and that chaos will appear as some
form of mental chaos spreading throughout the world. This chaos has already begun, as
demonstrated by the table below.

We are currently being flooded by mental chaos throughout and within our everyday lives, nearly all
of which people just do not understand or completely misunderstand. When a young person, who is
known to be suffering from a spectrum disorder such as ADHD, Asperger’s syndrome, PTSD or
such, is going through the ten year period of the late teens and early twenties when the brain
completely rewires it self from back to front, walks into a school a bar or some other group of
people and starts killing at will, that is a symptom of the mental chaos which we are presently subject
to which strikes our very being. Nor can the present and unprecedented political chaos that is
presently occurring around the world be discounted as another example of Prigogine’s principle.
Given all these problems that Homo sapiens now faces, only two outcomes come to mind. The
human species can and could diminish itself and slowly die away or very well destroy itself and/or
reduce itself to a mere footnote in the history of this planet, or it can follow simple genetic evolution
theory (except that our own consciousness is pushing this step of evolution which is non-
Darwinian) and evolve past its present problems, whether self-created or not. And this is what
seems to be happening at present.

Bibliography
(2005-2013) “Neuroplasticity: An Extraordinary Discovery of the Twentieth Century.” A to Z of
Brain, Mind and Learning. Online at http://www.learninginfo.org/neuroplasticity.htm.
Adrian, Bejan. (1997) Advanced Engineering Thermodynamics, 2nd edition. New York: Wiley.
Akimov, A.E. and G. I. Shipov. (1997) “Torsion Fields and their Experimental manifestations.”
Journal of New Energy 2, 2: 67-84. At newenergytimes.com/v2/archives/fic/J/JNE2N2.PDF.
Abstract available online at amasci.com/freenrg/tors/tors.html.

31
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Akimov, A.E. and G.I. Shipov. (1995) “Torsion Fields and Their Experimental Manifestations.”
Proceedings of International Conference: New Ideas in Natural Science. First page and bibliography reprinted:
WWW. Online. Accessed 29 August 2002. At http://www.eskimo.com/~billb/freenrg/tors/
torsd.html; also available as Preprint No 4a. Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, International
Institute for Theoretical and Applied Physics, Moscow, 1995. Accessed 29 August 2002. At
http://www.binet.lv/firms/project/english/torsion.htm
Akimov, A.E. and G.I. Shipov. “Torsion Fields and Their Experimental Manifestations.”
Proceedings of International Conference: New Ideas in Natural Science (1995). First page and bibliography
reprinted: Accessed 29 August 2002 at www.eskimo.com/~billb/freenrg/tors/torsd.html>; also
available as Preprint No 4a. Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, International Institute for
Theoretical and Applied Physics, Moscow, 1995. Accessed 29 August 2002 at www.binet.lv/
firms/project/english/torsion.htm.
Alonso, A.C., T. Zaidi, I. Grundke-Iqbal and K. Iqbal. (1994) “Role of abnormally
phosphorylated tau in the breakdown of microtubules in Alzheimer disease.” Proceedings of the
National Academy of Science 91 (12): 5562–5566.
Anderson, Michael L. (2003) “Embodied Cognition: A field guide”. Artificial Intelligence 149: 91–
130.
Andrews, Sperry and Jennifer Tayloe. (2015) “Humanity’s capacity to share a common sense:
The absence that gives rise to our presence.” Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social
Philosophy 11, 2: 1-15.
Andrews, Sperry and Stephen Salka. (2014) “Mapping the whole in everyone: An Essay On:
Non-existence as the engine and axis of existence.” Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social
Philosophy 10, 1: 15-33.
Applequist, Thomas, Alan Chodos and Peter G.O. Freund, editors. (1986) Modern Kaluza-Klein
Theories. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley.
Arain, Mariam, Maliha Haque, Lina Johal, Puja Mathur, Wynand Nel, Afsha Rais, Rambur, and
Sushil Sharma. (2013) “Maturation of the adolescent brain.” Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 9: 449–461. At
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621648/arXiv: gr-qc/0106043; Also, at
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/print/2011/10/teenage-brains/dobbs-text.
Atwater, P.M.H. (2005) Beyond the Indigo Children: The New Children and the Coming of the Fifth
World. Bear and Company.
Atwater, P. M. H. (2011) Near-death Experiences, the Rest of the Story: What They Teach Us about
Living, Dying, and Our True Purpose. Charlottesville, VA: Hampton Roads Publishing.
Atwater, P.M.H. (2017) A Manual for Developing Humans. Rainbow Ridge Press. Quoted in a
Michael Tymn book review. The Searchlight 26, 5, October 2017: 11.
Barrow, John D. (1988) Theories of Everything: The Quest for Ultimate Explanation. New York:
Fawcett Columbine.
BBC Crew. (2017) “A Giant Neuron Has Been Found Wrapped Around the Entire
Circumference of The Brain.” Science Alert. Available online at http://www.sciencealert.com/a-giant-
neuron-has-been-found-wrapped-around-the-entire-circumference-of-the-brain.
Beal, James B. (1973) “Electrostatic Fields, Electromagnetic Fields, and Ions –
Mind/Body/Environment Interrelationships.” Paper presented at Neuro-electric Society Symposium and
Workshop, Snowmass-at-Aspen, Colorado, February 1973.

32
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Beal, James B. (1974) “How Fields Affect Us.” In: The World Council Institute, No.12. Fields within
fields … within fields.
Beal, James B. (1974) “The Emergence of Paraphysics: Research and applications.” In: Mitchell
Psychic Exploration: 426-447.
Becker, Robert O. with Gary Selden. (1985) The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of
Life. New York: Morrow.
Begré, Stefan, Angela Frommer, Roland von Känel, Claus Kiefer and Andrea Federspiel. (2007)
“Relation of white matter anisotropy to visual memory in 17 healthy subjects.” Brain Research 1168:
60-66
Beichler, James E and Sperry Andrews. (2017) “Intuitive consciousness and the logic of single
field physics: A conscious synergy of worldviews and theories.” At https://www.academia.
edu/32593126/Intuitive_consciousness_and_the_logic_of_single_field_physics_A_conscious_syner
gy_of_worldviews_and_theories.
Beichler, James E. (1980, 2013) Hyperspace Continuum: The five-dimensional continuum approach to a
unified field theory. Available online as an Amazon Kindle e-book titled Hyperspace Continuum; Part 1,
Hyperspace, was originally written as A Five-Dimensional Continuum Approach to a Unified Field
Theory. Master’s Thesis at San Francisco State University, December 1980; Part 2, Continuum, is an
update of the hyperspace concept in the context of modern physics.
Beichler, James E. (1991, 2013) Twist and Shout. Originally written as a doctoral dissertation for
the History and Philosophy of Science program at the University of Maryland, College Park. Later
published as Twist and Shout: Clifford’s (not so) secret program for ‘Solving the Universe’ as an Amazon Kindle
e-book.
Beichler, James E. (1992, 1996, 2016) “Bubble, Bubble, Toil and Trouble: A fresh look at
relativity, uncertainty and compatibility.” Originally unpublished in 1992. Published 1996 in Yggdrasil:
The Journal of Paraphysics. Expanded and republished in WISE Journal 5, 1, Spring 2016. Available at
https://www.academia.edu/20110699/EPR-b_Bubble_Bubble_Toil_and_Trouble.
Beichler, James E. (1997) “Up, Up and Away! The fifth dimension in physics.” Yggdrasil: The
Journal of Paraphysics 1, 2 (Summer 1997): 128-157.
Beichler, James E. (1999) “Single Field Unification and Consciousness.” Frontier Perspectives 8, 2.
Beichler, James E. (1999) The Paraphysical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Doctoral Dissertation,
The Union Institute. Portions published as “TOEs, fingers and the nose on your face.” Yggdrasil: The
Journal of Paraphysics 1, 4 (Winter solstice 1999): 417-566. Online at http://members.aol.com/yggdras
/paraphysics/toe1.htm; and “Strange facts find a theory: A new dimension for psi.” Yggdrasil: The
Journal of Paraphysics 1, 4 (Winter Solstice 1999): 567-596; Published as an Amazon Kindle e-book;
Republished (2017).
Beichler, James E. (2000) “Cross Purposes or Crossed Paths: Science, Psi and Religion.” 2000
Ashby Award paper for the ARPR. Journal of the Academy of Religion and Psychical Research, Spring 2000.
Beichler, James E. (2000) “Life and death in the Big City: The geometrical structure of dying.”
Yggdrasil: The Journal of Paraphysics 2 (3): 232-260. At https://www.academia.edu/ 7973990/Life_and_
Death_in_the_Big_City_The_geometrical_structure_of_dying.
Beichler, James E. (2000) “To Be or Not to Be! A ‘Paraphysics’ for the New Millennium.”
Presentation for the 19th Annual Society of Scientific Exploration Meeting, June 2000, Kings
College, London, Ontario, Canada. Journal of Scientific Exploration 15, 1 (2001).

33
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Beichler, James E. (2001) “From Paraphysics to Cosmic Consciousness: The Endgame.”

Presentation for the ARPR 26th Annual Conference, “Cosmic Consciousness, Near-Death
Experiences and the Afterlife,” Friday, June 8, 2001 to Sunday, June 10, 2001, Hastings Hotel and
Conference Center, Hartford, Connecticut. The Academy of Religion and Psychical Research, 2001 Annual
Conference Proceedings: 70-82.
Beichler, James E. (2001) “The SOFT Nucleus.” Yggdrasil: The Journal of Paraphysics 3, 1 (Winter
Solstice 2001): 49-56.
Beichler, James E. (2002) “The relationship between Physics, Death and Communication.”
Presented at the 27th Annual Conference of the Academy of Religion and Psychical Research,
“Mediumship: A Gateway to other Dimensions of Existence,” 23 to 26 June 2002, Rosemont
College, Rosemont, Pennsylvania. The Academy of Religion and Psychical Research, 2002 Annual Conference
Proceedings: 40-52.
Beichler, James E. (2004, 2006) Alternative Physical Models of the Universe. Published in
MISAHA Newsletter, 2004; Republished in Life and Mind: In search of the physical basis. Edited by Savely
Savva. Victoria: Trafford, 2006: 239-262.
Beichler, James E. (2007) “Three Logical Proofs: The Five-Dimensional Reality of Space-
Time.” Journal of Scientific Exploration 21, 3: 523-542; At scientificexploration.org/ journal/jse_21_3_
beichler.pdf.
Beichler, James E. (2008) To Die For: The physical reality of conscious survival. Victoria, B.C.:
Trafford; also available as an Amazon Kindle e-book (2013).
Beichler, James E. (2009) “A Mysphyt Revolution: The logical nature of spiritual
enlightenment.” Journal of Spirituality and Paranormal Studies 32, 4:
Beichler, James E. (2009) “The Dark Mysteries of Consciousness: Paranormality within the
greater universe.” Spirituality, Science and the Paranormal, 2009 Annual Conference Proceedings, Academy of
Spirituality and Paranormal Studies Inc. Bloomfield, CT: 66-94.
Beichler, James E. (2010) “Physical Origins of Dark Matter and Dark Energy: Exploring
Shadows on the Cave Wall.” Space-Time Ether and Cosmology: physical vacuum relativity and quantum physics,
Volume 3. Edited by Michael C. Duffy and Joseph Levy. Apeiron Press, 2010: 259-311. At
https://www.academia.edu/7673956/Physical_Origins_of_Dark_Matter_and_Dark_Energy_
Exploring_Shadows_on_the_Cave_Wall.
Beichler, James E. (2010) “Dark Physics: Resurfacing the universe point by point.” Outline of
PowerPoint presentation at the SSE Annual Meeting in Boulder Colorado, 10-13 June 2010. At
https://independent.academia.edu/JamesJimBeichler/Analytics/activity/documents/8211698.
Beichler, James E. (2010) Evo: The next step. Victoria, B.C.: Trafford.
Beichler, James E. (2011) “Consciousness and Consequences.” Aspects of Consciousness: Essays on
Physics, Death and the Mind. Ingrid Fredricksson, editor. McFarland.
Beichler, James E. (2012, 2014) “The Body Magnetic: Physical source of consciousness, the
paranormal and survival.” A presentation at the 36th Annual Meeting of the SPR, University of
Northampton, UK, September 2012. Presentation at https://www.academia.edu/8311799/The_
Body_Magnetic_Physical_source_of_consciousness_the_paranormal_and_survival. Published in
Four Pillars of Wisdom: Fundamental concepts of natural science as an Amazon Kindle ebook. At https://
www.academia.edu/7674341/The_Body_Magnetic_The_physical_source_of_consciousness_the_pa
ranormal_and_survival.

34
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Beichler, James E. (2012) “The neurophysical basis of mind and consciousness: An

electromagnetic model of the neuron.” Presentation at the annual Spring Meeting of the OSAPS,
Ohio State University, April 2012. At https://www.academia.edu/8157951/The_neurophysical_
basis_of_mind_and_consciousness_An_electromagnetic_model_of_the_neuron.
Beichler, James E. (2012) “The neurophysics of mind and consciousness: A theoretical model
of emergence, evolution, psi and survival.” Presentation at SMN/SSE Conference at AnGrianan
AEC, Ireland, October 2012. At https://www.academia.edu/8311858/The_neurophysics_of_
mind_and_consciousness_A_theoretical_model_of_emergence_evolution_psi_and_survival.
Beichler, James E. (2012) “The Tie that Binds: The fundamental unit of ‘change’ in space and time.”
Presentation at Vigier/PIRT/BCS Conference 2012. London, UK. Physics of Reality: Space, Time,
Matter, Cosmos, Proceedings of the 8th Symposium Honoring Mathematical Physicist Jean-Pierre Vigier, edited by
Richard L Amoroso, Louis H Kauffman and Peter Rowlands. World Scientific Publishing Company,
2013. At https://www.academia.edu/ 7708594/THE_ TIE_THAT_BINDS_A_
FUNDAMENTAL_1UNIT_OF_CHANGE_IN_SPACE_AND_TIME.
Beichler, James E. (2012) Fallacies in Fysics. Volume 1: An Amazon Kindle e-book.
Beichler, James E. (2013) “The Neuro-Cosmological Basis of Consciousness and Spirituality.”
2013 Annual Conference of the Academy of Spiritual and Consciousness Studies, Inc., Virginia
Beach, VA, June 2013. 2013 ASCSI Proceedings. At https://www.academia.edu/7791290/
The_Neuro-Cosmological_Basis_of_Consciousness_and_Spirituality .
Beichler, James E. (2013) “The Point of Unification in Theoretical Physics.” In Proceedings of the
20th NPA Conference. Available www.worldsci.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_paperlink_7066.docx; At
www.academia.edu/7674017/The_point_of_unification_in_theoretical_physics.
Beichler, James E. (2013) Four Pillars of Wisdom: Fundamental concepts of natural science. Published
and available online as an Amazon Kindle e-book.
Beichler, James E. (2013) Hyperspace Continuum: The five-dimensional continuum approach to a unified
field theory. Published and available online as a Kindle e-book.
Beichler, James E. (2013) Phallacies in Fysics. Volume 1: The untold story of Classical Physics. Published
and available online as a Kindle e-book.
Beichler, James E. (2014) “Consciousness of Unification: The Mind-Matter Phallacy bites the
Dust.” Vigier IX Symposium Proceedings, October 2015. At https://www.academia.edu/7708681/
CONSCIOUSNESS_OF_UNIFICATION_THE_MIND-MATTER_PHALLACY_BITES_
THE_DUST.
Beichler, James E. (2014) “Modern Fysics Phallacies: The best way not to unify physics.”
Presentation at Vigier IX Conference, Baltimore, MD. At https://www.academia.edu/7708652/
MODERN_FYSICS_PHALLACIES_THE_BEST_WAY_NOT_TO_UNIFY_PHYSICS. Full
paper in Proceedings of Vigier IX. At https://www.academia.edu/7708652/MODERN_FYSICS_
PHALLACIES_THE_BEST_WAY_NOT_TO_UNIFY_PHYSICS.
Beichler, James E. (2014) “The evolutionary imperative of consciousness.” Journal of
Conscientology (IAC) At www.academia.edu/12551336/The_Evolutionary_Imperative_of_
Consciousness_Full_paper_.
Beichler, James E. (2015) “A physics of consciousness, psi and survival.” WISE Journal 4, 2: 57-
70. At https://www.academia.edu/10365583/A_physics_of_consciousness_psi_and_survival.

35
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Beichler, James E. (2015) “Finishing Einstein Point by Point: The unification of quantum and
relativity.” WISE Journal 4, 4, 21 December 2015. At https://www.academia.edu/16201568/
Finishing_Einstein_Point_by_Point_The_unification_of_quantum_and_relativity.
Beichler, James E. (2015) “The Einstein unified field theory completed: A direct challenge to
the basic assumptions, theories and direction of modern and post-modern physics”. An unpublished
book (1st Edition). At https://www.academia.edu/12035946/The_Einstein_unified_
field_theory_completed_A_direct_challenge_to_the_basic_assumptions_theories_and_direction_of
_modern_and_post-modern_physics_1st_Edition_.
Beichler, James E. (2015) “The Emergence of Neurocosmology: Evolution physics,
consciousness, physical reality and our experiential universe.” Proceedings of the Vigier 9 Symposium. At
https://www.academia.edu/27662437/The_Emergence_of_Neurocosmology_ Evolution_ physics_
consciousness_physical_reality_and_our_experiential_universe.
Beichler, James E. (2016) “EPR-b: Bubble, bubble, toil and Trouble.” WISE Journal, 5, 1, Spring
2016. At https://www.academia.edu/20110699/EPR-_Bubble_Bubble_Toil_and_Trouble.
Beichler, James E. (2016) “Flint, Wilson and unification at the Bedford School.” Excerpt from
Phallacies of Fysics: The untold story of modern physics, Volume 2. To be published. At
https://www.academia.edu/11311710/Flint_Wilson_and_unification_at_the_Bedford_School_
The_untold_tale_of_a_search_for_a_unified_field_theory.
Beichler, James E. (2016) “Quantized space-time structure: The 0-D point/twist as co-creator
of the continuum and single field”. Proceedings of the Vigier X Symposium. July 2016. At
https://www.academia.edu/27167490/Quantized_space-time structure_The_0-D_point_twist_as
_co-creator_of_the_continuum_and_single_field
Beichler, James E. (2017) “In the Beginning: Evolution physics, consciousness and our physical
reality.” WISE Journal, 5, 1. At https://www.academia.edu/29738682/In_the_Beginning_
Evolution_physics_consciousness_and_our_physical_reality.
Beichler, James E. (2017) “Unification Accomplished: Einstein’s dream realized in the Single
Field Theory.” WISE Journal 6, 1: 41-51. At https://www.academia.edu/32985587/Unification_
Accomplished_Einsteins_dream_realized_in_the_Single_Field_Theory.
Beichler, James E. (2017) “A Physics of Consciousness: The only path to understanding
consciousness (since consciousness is its ‘self’ the path).” Paper based on a Council Grove
presentation, April 2017. At https://www.academia.edu/33309104/A_Physics_of_Consciousness_
The_only_path_to_understanding_consciousness. Presentation at https://www.academia.edu/
34388666/A_Physics_of_Consciousness_The_only_path_to_understanding_true_consciousness.
Beichler, James E. (2017) “Consciousness Manifesto: Physical origins of consciousness through
evolution and revolution.” WISE Journal. At https://www.academia.edu/34710506/Consciousness_
Manifesto_Physical_origins_of_consciousness_through_evolution_and_revolution
Beichler, James E. (2018) “A complete unification of modern physics paradigms: A necessary
reappraisal of the state of theoretical physics in light of new observational data.” Letter to the editors
of Scientific American magazine, 25 July 2018. Never published. At https://www.academia.edu/
37129878/A_complete_unification_of_modern_physics_paradigms_A_necessary_reappraisal_of_th
e_state_of_theoretical_physics_in_light_of_new_observational_data.
Beichler, James E. (2018) “The new galactic dynamic: A complete model of DE, DM and their
role in forming galaxies.” Full unpublished paper, 15 October 2018. At https://www.academia.
edu/37722661/The_new_galactic_dynamic_A_complete_model_of_DE_DM_and_their_role_

36
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

in_forming_galaxies; And at ttps://www.academia.edu/37722666/The_new_galactic_dynamic_A_

complete_model_of_DE_DM_and_their_role_in_forming_galaxies.
Bejan, Adrian and J. Peder Zane. (2012) Design in Nature: How the Constructal law governs evolution in
biology, physics, technology, and social organization. New York: Doubleday.
Belenkiy, Ari. (2012) “Alexander Friedmann and the origins of modern cosmology”. Physics
Today 65 (10): 38; doi: 10.1063/PT.3.1750. At http://cosmo.fisica.unimi.it/assets/IntroAstro/
IntroAstro1516/Alan-Friedmann-and-the-Origins-of-Modern-Cosmology.pdf.
Bohm, David and B. J. Hiley. (1975) “On the intuitive understanding of nonlocality as implied
by quantum theory.” Foundations of Physics 5, 1: 93-109.
Bohm, David and B.J. Hiley. (1993) The Undivided Universe: An ontological interpretation of quantum
theory. London: Routledge.
Bohm, David and P. N. Kaloyerou. (1987) “An ontological basis for the quantum theory.”
Physics Reports (Review section of Physics Letters) 144: 321–375.
Bohm, David. (1951) Quantum Theory. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Bohm, David. (1952) “A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ‘hidden’
variables.” Physical Review. 85: 166-179.
Bohm, David. (1957) Causality and Chance in Modern Physics. Princeton: Van Nostrand.
Bohm, David. (1980) Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Bohm, David. (1990) “A new theory of the relationship of mind and matter.” Philosophical
Psychology 3 (2): 271–286.
Bohr, Niels. (1958) Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. New York: Wiley, 1958.
Bowyer, Susan M. “Coherence a measure of the brain networks: past and present.” At
https://npepjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40810-015-0015-7.
Boyd, Robynne. (2008) “Do People Only Use 10 Percent of Their Brains?” Scientific American.
At https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/do-people-only-use-10-percent-of-their-brains.
Brizhik, Larissa, Agata Scordino, Antonion Triglia and Francesco Musumeci. (2001) “Delayed
Luminescence of Biological Systems arising from Correlated Many-Soliton States.” Physical Review E
64, 031902.
Brody, Dorje and Lane P. Hughston. (1999) “Geometric Quantum Mechanics.” At arxiv.org/
pdf/quant-ph/9906086v2.pdf.
Browne, Robert T. (1919) The Mystery of Space. A study of the hyperspace movement in the light of the
evolution of new psychic faculties, and an inquiry into the genesis and essential nature of space. New York: E. P.
Dutton and Company.
Bruer, John T. (1999) “Neural Connections: Some You Use, Some You Lose”. Phi Delta Kappa
81, 4: 264-277. At https://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/31709587.pdf.
Bucke, Richard Maurice. (1901) Cosmic Consciousness A Study in the Evolution of the Human Mind.
London: Dutton and Company. Available at https://selfdefinition.org/christian/Cosmic-
Consciousness-by-Richard-M-Bucke-text.pdf.
Burbidge, E.M., Burbidge, G.R., Fowler, W.A. and Hoyle, F. (1957) “Synthesis of the Elements
in Stars”. Revs. Mod. Physics 29: 547–650.
Carr, Bernard. (2008) “Worlds Apart? Can Psychical Research Bridge the Gap between Matter
and Mind?” Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research 59: 1-96.
Cartan, Élie. (1913) “Les groupes projectifs qui ne laissent invariante aucune multiplicité plane.”
Bul. Soc. Math. France 41: 53–96.

37
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Cartan, Élie. (1923) “Sur les variétés à connexion affine et la théorie de la relativité généralisée.”
Part I: Ann. Éc. Norm. 40: 325–412, and (1924) 41: 1–25; Part II: (1925) 42: 17–88.
Cartan, Élie. (1923) “Sur une généralisation de la notion de courbure de Riemann et les espaces
à torsion.” C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 174: 593–595.
Cartan, Élie. (1925) La geometrie des espaces de Riemanns, fasc. 9 of Memorial des Sciences Mathematiques.
Paris: 1925.
Cartan, Élie. (1926) “Espaces à connexion affine, projective et conforme.” Acta Mathematica 48:
1–42.
Cartan, Élie. (1928) Lecons sur les geometrie des espaces Riemann. Paris: 1928.
Center for Consciousness Studies, Newsroom, University of Arizona. (2017) “Consciousness
Depends on Tubulin Vibrations Inside Neurons, Anesthesia Study Suggests”. http://www.
newswise. com/articles/consciousness-depends-on-tubulin-vibrations-inside-neurons-anesthesia-
study-suggests.
Chadwick, Martin J., Demis Hassabis and Eleanor A. Maguire. (2011) “Decoding overlapping
memories in the medial temporal lobes using high-resolution fMRI.” Learning and Memory 18: 742-
746; At http://learnmem.cshlp.org/content/18/12/742.full.pdf+html.
Chappell, James M., Azhar Iqbal, John G. Hartnett, and Derek Abbott. (2016) “The vector
algebra war: a historical perspective. The vector algebra war: a historical perspective.” At
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1509.00501.pdf.
Chen, Chi-Shuo, Wei-Ju Chung, Ian C. Hsu, Chien-Ming Wu and Wei-Chun Chin. (2012)
“Force field measurements within the exclusion zone of water.” Journal of Biological Physics 38: 113-
120.
Cherry, Kendra. (2019) “The 4 Stages of Cognitive Development: Background and Key
Concepts of Piaget's Theory.” Verywell Mind. Updated May 20, 2019. At https://www.
verywellmind.com/piagets-stages-of-cognitive-development-2795457.
Cheung, Humphrey. (2008) “Infrared-blasting Helmet Could Reverse Alzheimer’s Disease.”
Tom’s Hardware Guide. 25 January 2008. Accessed 5 October 2009. At http://www.tomshardware.
com/news/infrared-blasting-helmet-reverse-alzheimer-s-disease/4748.html.
Chi-Shuo Che, Wei-Ju Chung, Ian C. Hsu, Chien-Ming Wu, Wei-Chun Chin. (2012) ‘Force field
measurements within the exclusion zone of water.” Journal of Biological Physics 38: 113-120.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234020052.
Clifford, William Kingdon. (1873) “Preliminary Sketch of Biquaternions.” Proceedings of the
London Mathematical Society (12 June 1873): 381-395; Reprinted in Mathematical Papers: 181-200.
Clifford, William Kingdon. (1873/1874) “The Philosophy of the Pure Sciences: Part II. The
Postulates of the Science of Space.” Delivered as part of the afternoon lecture series at the Royal
Institution on 8 March in 1873, subsequently printed in Contemporary Review, 1874: 360-376;
Reprinted in Lectures and Essays, edited by Leslie Stephen and Frederick Pollock. London: Macmillan.
Volume 1: 295-323.
Clifford, William Kingdon. (1870) “On the Space Theory of Matter.” Read 21 February 1870.
Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Volume 2 (1866/1876). Cambridge: University Press:
157-158; reprinted in: Mathematical Papers. Edited by Robert Tucker, Introduction by H.J. Stephen
Smith. Bronx, New York: Chelsea Publishing, 1969; reprint of first edition, 1882: 21-22.
Clifford, William Kingdon. (1873) “Preliminary Sketch of Biquaternions.” Proceedings of the
London Mathematical Society: 381-395; Reprinted in Mathematical Papers, edited by Robert Tucker with a

38
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

preface by H.J. Stephen Smith. Reproduction of 1882 original: New York: Chelsea Publishing, 1968;
181-200.
Clifford, William Kingdon. (1875) “The Postulates of the Science of Space.” Contemporary Review
25: 360-376
Clifford, William Kingdon. (1878) Elements of Dynamic: An Introduction to the Study of Motion and
Rest in Solid and Fluid Bodies, Part I: Kinematics. London: Macmillan.
Clifford, William Kingdon. (1882) Mathematical Papers, edited by Robert Tucker with a preface
by H.J. Stephen Smith. New York: Chelsea Publishing, 1968. Reproduction of 1882 original.
Corson, Dale and Paul Lorrain. Introduction to Electromagnetic Fields and Waves. San Francisco:
Freeman, 1962.
Costandi, Mo. (2012) “Does your brain produce new cells?” The Guardian. 23 February 2012.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/neurophilosophy/2012/feb/23/brain-new-cells-adult-
neurogenesis.
Craddock TJA, Kurian P, Preto J, Sahu K, Hameroff SR, Klobukowski M, Tuszynski JA. (2017)
“Anesthetic Alterations of Collective Terahertz Oscillations in Tubulin Correlate with Clinical
Potency: Implications for Anesthetic Action and Post-Operative Cognitive Dysfunction.” Sci Rep. 7,
1: 9877.
Cukur, Tolga, Alexander G. Huth, Shinji Nishimoto and Jack L. Gallant. (2013) “Functional
Subdomains within Human FFA.” Journal of Neuroscience 33, 42: 16748-16766.
Cytowic, Richard E. (2017) “The Pit in Your Stomach is Actually Your Second Brain.” Psychology
Today. Posted Jan 17, 2017 at https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-fallible-mind/201701/
the-pit-in-your-stomach-is-actually-your-second-brain.
Fiona MacDonald. (2016) “You Have a Second Brain.” Science Alert. Posted 1 October 2016 at
https://www.sciencealert.com/you-have-a-second-brain.
Davies, Paul C.W. and Julian Brown, editors. (1988) Superstrings, A Theory of Everything.
Cambridge: CUP, 1988.
DeBroglie, Louis. (1926) Comptes Rendus, 183, 447.
DeBroglie, Louis. (1927) Comptes Rendus, 185, 580.
DeBroglie, Louis. (1927) “Electrons et Photons: Rapports et Descussions du Cinquieme
Conseil de Physique tenu a Bruxelles du 24 au 29 October 1927 sous les auspices de l’Institut
International Physique Solvay.” Solvay Conference. Published 1928.
DeBroglie, Louis. (1956) Une tentative d’interprétation causale et non linéaire de la mécanique ondulatoire:
la théorie de la double solution. Paris: Gauthier-Villars; English translation: Non-linear Wave Mechanics: A
Causal Interpretation. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1960.
DeBroglie, Louis. (1962) New Perspectives in Physics. Trans. A. J. Pomerans. New York: Basic
Books.
DeBroglie, Louis. (1987) “Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory.”
Annales de la Louis de Broglie 12: 1-23. At aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf.
Dobbs, David. (2011) “Beautiful Brains.” National Geographic Magazine, October 2011. At
http://ngm.national geomgraphic.com/print/2011/com/teenage-brains/dobbs.text.
Dabbs, David. (2011) “Teenage Brains.” National Geographic Magazine. At https://www.
nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2011/10/beautiful-brains/.
Doheny, Kathleen. (2008) “Autism Cases on the Rise; Reason for Increase a Mystery.” WebMD.
At http://www.webmd.com/brain/autism/searching-for-answers/autism-rise.

39
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Hicks, Mack R. (2013) “Why the Increase in ADHD?” Psychology Today. At https://www.
psychologytoday.com/blog/digital-pandemic/201308/why-the-increase-in-adhd.
Eccles, Sir John C. (1977) Understanding the Brain, second edition. McGraw-Hill.
Eddington, Arthur. (1921) “A Generalisation of Weyl’s Theory of the Electromagnetic
Gravitational Fields.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A99: 104-122.
Eddington, Sir Arthur. (1923) The Mathematical Theory of Relativity. Cambridge University Press.
Eddlem, Thomas R. (2009) “EPA declares human breath (CO2) a pollutant”. 20 April 2009. At
www.thenewamerican.com/tech-mainmenu-30/environment/1022.
Einstein, Albert. (1929) “Zur Einheitlichen Feldtheorie.” Sitz. Ber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. 1: 2-7;
“Field Theories Old and New.” New York Times, 3 February 1929. Reprinted New York; Readex
Microprint, n.d.
Einstein, Albert and B. Kaufman. (1955) “A New Form of the General Relativistic Field
Equations.” Annals of Mathematics 62: 128-18.
Einstein, Albert and E.G. Strauss. (1946) “A Generalization of the Relativistic Theory of
Gravitation II.” Annals of Mathematics 47: 731-741.
Einstein, Albert, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen. (1935) “Can quantum mechanical
description of physical reality be considered complete?” Physical Review 47: 777-780.
Einstein, Albert and Peter G. Bergmann. (1938) “On a Generalization of Kaluza’s Theory of
Electricity.” Annals of Mathematics 39: 683-701.
Einstein, Albert, Peter Bergmann and Valentin Bargmann. (1941) “On the Five-Dimensional
Representation of Gravitation and Electricity.” In the Theodor von Karman Anniversary Volume.
Pasadena, 1941: 212-225.
Einstein, Albert. (1915) “Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation.” Berliner Sitzungsberichte (part 2):
844–847.
Einstein, Albert. (1923) “Bemerkung zu meiner Arbeit ‘Zur allgemeinen; Relativitatstheorie’.”
Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Phys.-math. Klasse, Sitzungsberichte 1923: 76–77.
Einstein, Albert. (1923) “Zur affinen Feldtheorie.” Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Phys.-
math. Klasse, Sitzungsberichte 1923: 137–140.
Einstein, Albert. (1923) “Zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie.” Preussische Akademie der
Wissenschaften, Phys.-math. Klasse, Sitzungsberichte: 32–38.
Einstein, Albert. (1925) “Einheitliche theorie von Gravitation und Elektrizität.” Sitzungsberichte
der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Berlin), Physickalische-mathematische klasse: 414-419.
Einstein, Albert. (1929) “Field Theories Old and New.” New York Times, 3 February 1929.
Reprinted New York; Readex Microprint, n.d.
Einstein, Albert. (1929) “The New Field theory I, II.” Observatory 51: 82-87.
Einstein, Albert. (1929) “Zur einheitlichen Feldtheorie.” Sitzsber. Preuss. Akad. Wissen. 1: 2-7.
Einstein, Albert. (1930) “Auf die Riemann-Metric und den Fernparallelismus gegründte
einheitliche Feldtheorie.” Mathematische Annalen 102: 685-697.
Einstein, Albert. (1945) “A Generalization of the Relativity Theory of Gravitation.” Annals of
Mathematics 46: 578-84.
Einstein, Albert. (1952) “A Comment on a Criticism of Unified Field Theory.” Letters to the
Editor. Physical Review 89: 321.
Einstein, Albert. (1953) “A Comment on a Criticism of Unified Field Theory.” Letters to the
Editor. Physical Review 89: 321.

40
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Einstein, Albert. (1956) Meaning of Relativity, 6th edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press,
and Calcutta: Oxford and IBH Publishing.
Elcio Abdalla, Bouchra Maroufl, Bertha Cuadros Melgar, and Moulay Brahim Sedra. (2001)
“Information transport by sine-Gordon solitons in microtubules.” Available online at https://
arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0103042.
Ellis, John. “Interview.” Davies and Brown. Superstrings: 151-169.
Faggin, Federico. (2014) “Consciousness and matter co-evolve.” Available at http://www.
fagginfoundation.org/articles-2/consciousness-and-matter-co-evolve/.
Faggin, Federico. (2016) A private conversation with Federico Faggin in Palo Alto, CA. 25 May
2016.
Feinberg, Gerald. (1974) “Foreword.” In: Mitchell. Psychic Explorations: 21-24.
Flint, Henry T. (1945) “Quantum Equations and Nuclear Field Theories.” Philosophical Magazine
36: 635-643.
Flint, Henry T. (1966) The Quantum Equation and the Theory of Fields. London: Methuen.
Flint, Henry T. (n.d.) In an undated group of notes titled “[Presented] Before the Royal
Society.” Flint’s private papers archived at the University of London.
Foglia, Lucia and Robert A. Wilson. (2013) “Embodied Cognition.” WIREs Cognitive Science 4, 3:
319-325. At https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wcs.1226. Also at https://www.
researchgate.net/publication/264297475/EmbodiedCognition.
Frankland, F.W. (1877) “On the Simplest Continuous Manifoldness of Two Dimensions of
Finite Extent.” Nature 12: 515-517.
Frick, P., et al. (2003) “Effective magnetic permeability of a turbulent fluid with macroferro
particles.” EPJ manuscript. Available at www.ens-lyon.fr/~pinton/ARTICLES/mhd_SB_EPJB.pdf.
Gagné, F. (1985). “Giftedness and talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definitions.”
Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 103-112.
Gamow, George. (1947, revised 1961) One Two Three ... Infinity. Viking Press.
Georgiev, Danko D., Stelios N. Papaioanou and James F. Glazebrook. (2007) “Solitonic Effects
of the Local Electromagnetic Field on Neuronal Microtubules.” Neuroquantology 5, 3: 276-291. At
http://cogprints.org/5814/1/solitons_in_brain.pdf.
Georgiev, Danko Dimchev. “Electric and magnetic fields inside neurons and their impact upon
the cytoskeletal microtubules.” Accessed 12 February 2012. At hppt://www.researchgate.net/
publication/28763820_Electric_and_magnetic_fields_inside_neurons_and_their_impact_upon_the_
cytoskeletal_microtubules.
Giancoli, Douglas C. (1991) Physics: Principles with Applications, third edition. Englewood Cliffs,
New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Gödel, Kurt. (1931) “Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und
verwandter Systeme, I.” Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 38: 173-98.
Gönner, Hubert F.M. (2004) “On the History of Unified Field Theories.” Living Reviews in
Relativity 7, 2.
Graham, Judith. (2016) “Children and Brain Development: What We Know About How
Children Learn”. Revised by Leslie A. Forstadt. Bulletin #4356, Children and Brain Development: What
We Know About How Children Learn. University of Maine, Cooperative Education. At https://
extension.umaine.edu/publications/4356e/.

41
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Granqvist, P., M. Fredrikson, P. Unge, A. Hagenfeldt, A., S. Valind, S., D. Larhammar and M.
Larsson. (2005) “Sensed presence and mystical experiences are predicted by suggestibility, not by the
application of transcranial weak complex magnetic fields.” Neuroscience Letters 379, 1: 1–6. At
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2004.10.057.
Graves, John Cowperthwaite. (1971) The Conceptual Foundations of Contemporary Relativity Theory.
Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Green, Michael. “Interview.” Davies and Brown. Superstrings: 107-139.
Gross, C.G. (2002) “Genealogy of the “Grandmother Cell.” Neuroscientist 8, 5: 512–518; At
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107385802237175.
Gustke, N., B. Steiner, E.-M. Mandelkow, J. Biernat, H.E. Meyer, M. Goedert and E.
Mandelkow. (1992) “The Alzheimer-like phosphorylation of tau protein reduces microtubule
binding and involves Ser-Pro and Thr-Pro motifs.” Federation of the European Biochemical Societies 307,
2: 199-205.
Guth, Alan. (1997) The Inflationary Universe: The Quest for a New Theory of Cosmic Origins. Perseus
Books.
Guth, Alan. “Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems.”
Physical Review D 23 (2): 347–356.
Hagan, S., S. Hameroff and J. Tuszyński. (2002) “Quantum Computation in Brain
Microtubules? Decoherence and Biological Feasibility.” Physical Reviews E 65: 061901.
Hagmann, P, Kurant M, Gigandet X, Thiran P, Wedeen VJ, Meuli R, et al. (2007) “Mapping
Human Whole-Brain Structural Networks with Diffusion MRI.” PLoS ONE 2 (7): e597. At
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000597
Hameroff, Stuart and Roger Penrose. (1995) “Orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in
brain microtubules: A model for consciousness.” Neural Network World 5 (5): 793-804.
Hameroff, Stuart and Roger Penrose. (1996) “Orchestrated Reduction of Quantum Coherence
in Brain Microtubules: A Model for Consciousness?” In: S. Hameroff, A.W. Kaszniak and A.C.
Scott, editors Toward a Science of Consciousness - The First Tucson Discussions and Debates. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press: 507-540.
Hameroff, Stuart and Roger Penrose. (2005) “Conscious events as Orchestrated Space-Time
Selections”. PDF at http://www.quantumconsciousness.org/penrose-hameroff/consciousevents.
html.
Hameroff, Stuart, J.E. Dayhoff, R.A. Lahoz-Beltra, Samsonovich and S. Rasmussen. (1992)
“Conformational automata in the cytoskeleton: models for molecular computation.” IEEE Computer
(October Special Issue on Molecular Computing): 30-39.
Hameroff, Stuart. (1998) “Quantum Computation in Brain Microtubules? The Penrose-
Hameroff “Orch OR” model of consciousness.” Philosophical Transactions Royal Society London (A)
356:1869-1896.
Hameroff, Stuart. (2006) “Consciousness, Neurobiology and Quantum Mechanics: The case for
a connection.” Tuszynski, Emerging Physics of Consciousness: 193-254.
HeartMath Research Center. Science of the Heart: Exploring the role of the heart in human performance.
Available online at www.heartmath.org/templates/ihm/downloads/pdf/e-books/science-of-the-
heart.pdf.
HeartMath. (2010) “The Energetic Heart Is Unfolding”. At https://www.heartmath.org/
articles-of-the-heart/science-of-the-heart/the-energetic-heart-is-unfolding/.

42
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Heaviside, Oliver. (1893) “A Gravitational and Electromagnetic Analogy.” The Electrician 31: 81-
82; Reprinted in Oleg D. Jefimenko. Causality, Electromagnetic Induction, and Gravitation: 189-202. At
http://serg.fedosin.ru/Heavisid.htm.
Hessenberg, G. (1917) “Vectorielle Begründung der Differentialgeometrie.” Math. Annalen 77:
187-216.
Hilbert, David, Lothar (Wolfgang) Nordheim and John von Neumann. (1927) “Über die
Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik.” Mathematische Annalen 98: 1–30, doi:10.1007/BF01451579.
Hilbert, David. (1900) “Mathematical Problems.” Lecture delivered before the International
Congress of Mathematicians at Paris. At aleph0.clarku.edu/~djoyce/hilbert/problems.html.
Hilbert, David. (1915) “Die Grundlagen der Physik.” (Erste Mitteilung.) Göttinger Nachrichten:
395-407.
Hinton, Charles Howard. (1880) “What is the Fourth Dimension?” Originally published in
Cheltenham Ladies’ College Magazine and Dublin University Magazine. Published as a pamphlet with the
subtitle “Ghosts”, 1884-1886. 1:1-32; Reprinted in Speculations: 1-22.
Hinton, Charles Howard. (1888) A New Era of Thought. London: Swann, Sonnenschein.
Ho, Vu B. (1995) “A geometric formulation of strong interaction.” At http://arxiv.org/abs/
hep-th/9504072.
Holburn, David. (2012) “A Simple Radio Receiver”. Last updated 18 July 2008, Downloaded 5
January 2012. At http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~dmh/ptialcd/trf/trf.htm.
Hossenfelder, Sabine and Tobias Mistele. (2018) “The Redshift-Dependence of Radial
Acceleration: Modified Gravity versus Particle Dark Matter.” 23 March 2018. At https://arxiv.org/
pdf/1803.08683.pdf.
Hossenfelder, Sabine, Stacy S. McGaugh. (2018) “Is Dark Matter real?” Scientific American
(August 2018)/.
Hoyle, Fred. (1981) “The big bang in astronomy”. New Scientist 92, 1280: 527.
Hu, Huping and Maoxin Wu. (2002) “Consciousness-mediated spin theory: Theory,
experimental studies, further development and related topics.” Medical Hypotheses 63 (2004): 633-646;
(2007) Revised fifth version downloadable at http://arxiv.org/abs/quantph/02.
I-SIS News Staff. (2008) “DNA Sequence Reconstructed from Water memory?” Scientific
Blogging, 25 October 2008. At http://www.i-sis.org.uk/DNA_sequence_reconstituted_from_Water_
Memory.php.
Jackson, John David. (1974) Classical Electrodynamics, second edition. New York: John Wiley and
Sons.
Jahn, Robert D. and Brenda J. Dunne. (1987) Margins of Reality: The Role of Consciousness in the
Physical World. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
James, William. (1890) The principles of psychology. New York: Dover. At http://psychclassics.
asu.edu/James/Principles/prin6.htm.
Jantzen, R.T., P. Carini, and D. Bini. (1992). “The Many Faces of Gravitoelectromagnetism”.
Annals of Physics 215: 1–50.
Johnson, C. Peter. (1953) “A Criticism of a Recent Unified Field Theory,” Letters to the Editor.
Physical Review 89: 320-1.
Josephson, Brian D. (1988) “Limits to the Universality of Quantum Mechanics.” Foundation of
Physics 18: 195-204. At http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10/papers/QMlimits.html.

43
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Josephson, Brian D. and Fotini Pallikari-Viras. (1988) “Biological Utilisation of Quantum

NonLocality.” Foundation of Physics 18: 195-204. At http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10/
papers/bell.html
Kaku, Michio. (1994) Hyperspace: A Scientific Odyssey Through Parallel Universes, Time Warps, and the
10th Dimension. New York: Anchor Doubleday.
Kaluza, Theodor. (1921) “Zur Unitätsproblem der Physik.” Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen
Akademie der Wissenschaften 54: 966-972: Reprinted in Applequist, et.al., Eds. Modern Kaluza-Klein
Theories: 69-75.
Karni, Avi and Dov Sagi. (1991) “Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination:
Evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88: 4966-4970. At https://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC51788/pdf/pnas01061-0412.pdf.
Karton, I. and Bachmann, T. (2011) “Effect of prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation on
spontaneous truth telling.” Behavioural Brain Research 225: 209-214. At http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.bbr.2011.07.028.
Kasner, Edward. (1921) “Finite Representations of the Solar Gravitational Field in Flat Space of
Six Dimensions.” American Journal of Mathematics 48: 130-134.
Kasner, Edward. (1921) “Geometrical Theorems on Einstein’s Cosmological Equation.”
American Journal of Mathematics 48: 217-221.
Kasner, Edward. (1921) “The Impossibility of Einstein’s Fields Immersed in A Flat Space of
Five Dimensions.” American Journal of Mathematics 48: 126-129.
Kasner, Edward. (1921) “The Einstein Solar Field and Space of Six Dimensions.” Science 53:
238-239.
Kay, Kendrick N., Thomas Naselaris, Ryan J. Prenger and Jack L. Gallant. (2008) “Identifying
natural images from human brain activity.” Nature 452: 352-355. At http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/
nature06713.
Keim, Brandon. (2007) “Humans evolving more rapidly than ever, say scientists”. WIRED
Science. Posted 12.10.07. At https://www.wired.com/2007/12/humans-evolving/.
Khamsi, Roxanne. (2005) “Jennifer Aniston Strikes a Nerve: Single brain cells show selective
response to specific celebrity photos.” Nature: International Journal of Science (22 June 2005) At
www.nature.com/news/2005/050620/full/news050620-7.html.
Klein, Felix. (1890) “Zur Nicht-Euklidischen Geomtrie.” Mathematische Annalen 37: 544-572;
Reprinted in Gesammelte Mathematische Abhandlungen I. Berlin: Springer, 1921: 353-383.
Klein, Oscar. (1926) “Quantentheorie und Fünfdimensionale Relativitätstheorie.” Zeitschrift fur
Physik: 895-906.
Klein, Oscar. (1926) “The Atomicity of Electricity as a Quantum Theory Law.” Nature 118: 516.
Klein, Oskar. (1927) “Sur L’Article de M.L. DeBroglie “L’Univers A Cinq Dimensions et la
Mécanique Ondulatoire.” Le Journal de Physique et le Radium, Serie 6, Tome 8: 242-243.
Klein, Oscar. (1927) “Zur Fünfdimensionale Darstellung der Relativitätstheorie.” Zeitschrift fur
Physik 46: 188-208.
Klein, Oscar. (1939) “On the Theory of Charged Particles.” New Theories in Physics, International
Institute of Intellectual Cooperation. Paris: 77-93.
Klein, Oscar. (1947) “Meson Fields and Nuclear Interaction.” Arkiv for Mathematik, Astronomi
och Fysik 34A: 1-19.

44
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Konkrety, Alexander. (2002) The Torsion Field Fraud. 12 January 2001. Accessed 3 September
2002. At <http://www.skeptik.net/professor/tffraud.htm>
Konorski, J. (1967) Integrative activity of the brain; an interdisciplinary approach. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Kotz, Deborah and Angela Haupt. (2012) “7 Mind-Blowing Benefits of Exercise”. 7 March
2012. At https://health.usnews.com/health-news/diet-fitness/slideshows/7-mind-blowing-benefits-
of-exercise.
Kuhn, Thomas. (1996) The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press;
3rd edition, revised 1962.
Kujira, T., M. D. Caramia, J. C. Rothwell, B. L. Day, P. D. Thompson, Ferbert, S. Wroe, P.
Asselman and C. D. Marsden. (1993) “Corticocortical Inhibition in human Motor Cortex.” Journal of
Physiology 471: 501-519.
Kuzujanakis, Marianne. “ADHD, Autism, and Giftedness: An Invitation to a Conversation.”
Great Potential Press Blog. At http://www.greatpotentialpress.com/blog/kuzujanakis-series/adhd-
autism-and-giftedness-an-invitation-to-a-conversation.
Larsson, M., D. Larhammarb, M. Fredrikson and P. Granqvist. (2005) “Reply to M.A. Persinger
and S. A. Koren’s response to Granqvist et al. “Sensed presence and mystical experiences are
predicted by suggestibility, not by the application of transcranial weak magnetic fields”.” Neuroscience
Letters 380, 3: 348–350. At http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2005.03.059.
Lawrie, Ian D. (1990) A Unified Grand Tour of Theoretical Physics. New York: Adam Hilger.
Levi-Civita, T. (1917) “Nozione di paralleismo in una varieta qualunque e consequente
specificione geometrica della curvatura riemanniana.” Rend. Circ. Mat di Palermo 42; 173-215;
Reprinted in Opere Mathamatische, Vol.4 (1917-1928). Bologna: A Coura Dell’ Academia Nazionale dei
Lincei, 1960: 1- 39.
Lucadou, W. von and K. Kornwachs. (1976) “Can Quantum Theory Explain Paranormal
Phenomena?” Research 1976. Morris, Roll and Morris: 187-191.
Mach, Ernst. (1914) The analysis of sensations, and the relationship of the physical to the psychical.
Translated by C.M. Williams, revised and supplemented from the fifth German edition by Sydney
Waterlow. London: Open Court Publishing. At https://archive.org/details/analysisofsensat00mach.
MacIsaac, Tara. (2014) “How Common Are Near-Death Experiences? NDEs by the
Numbers.” Epoch Times. At http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/757401-how-common-are-near-
death-experiences-ndes-by-the-numbers/.
Macklem, P. T. (2008) “Emergent phenomena and the secrets of life”. Journal of Applied
Physiology 104 (6): 1844–1846. At http://doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00942.2007.
Manka, Ryszard and Bogdan Ogrodnik. “A Model of Soliton Transport along Microtubules.”
Journal of Biological Physics 18, 3: 185-189. At http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00417807.
Mashhoon, Bahram. (2000). Gravitoelectromagnetism. Reference Frames and
Gravitomagnetism - Proceedings of the XXIII Spanish Relativity Meeting: 121–132. At
https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0011014.pdf.
Mashhoon, Bahram. (2008). "Gravitoelectromagnetism: A Brief Review". in L. Iorio (ed.)
(2007). Measuring Gravitomagnetism: A Challenging Enterprise: 29-39. Nova. At https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-
qc/0311030.pdf.

45
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Matsuyama, S.S. and L.F. Jarvik. (1989) “Hypothesis: microtubules, a key to Alzheimer disease.”
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 86, 20: 8152-8156. At http://www.pnas .org/content/86/
20/8152.full.pdf.
Mayburov, S. (2012) “Photonic Communications and Information Encoding in Biological
Systems”. At https://arxiv.org/pdf/1205.4134.pdf.
McCratey, Rolin, Mike Atkinson and Dana Tomasino. (2001) Science of the Heart: Exploring the
Role of the Heart in Human Performance. HeartMath Research Center, Institute of HeartMath,
Publication number 01-001. At http://www.heartmath.org/free¬services/downloads/science-of-
the-heart.html.
McCraty, Rollin, Raymond Trevor Bradley and Dana Tomasino. (2015) “The Heart Has Its
Own ‘Brain’ and Consciousness”. At http://in5d.com/the-heart-has-its-own-brain-and-
consciousness/.
McGaugh, Federico Lelli and James M. Schombert. (2106) “Radial Acceleration Relation in
Rotationally Supported Galaxies.” Physical Review Letters 117, 201101 (11 November 2016). At
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.05917.pdf. Also, at https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/ 10.1103/
PhysRevLett.117.201101.
Mehra, Jagdish. (1974) Einstein, Hilbert and the Theory of Gravitation. Boston: D. Reidel.
Meksyn, D. (1934) “A Unified Field Theory. Part II: Gravitation.” Philosophical Magazine 17: 476-
482.
Meksyn, D. (1934) “Unified Field Theory, Part I: Electromagnetic Field.” Philosophical Magazine
17: 99-112
Mermin, P. David. (2012) “Quantum Mechanics: Fixing the shifty split.” Physics Today 65, 7: 8-
10.
Mershin, Andreas, et al. (2006) “Towards experimental Tests of Quantum Effects in
Cytoskeletal Proteins.” In: Tuszynksi, Emerging Physics of Consciousness: 95-170.
Michaeli, Dov. (2008) “Losing your mind? It’s your white matter, stupid”. The Doctor Weighs In.
Accessed 5 October 2009. At http://www.thedoctorweighsin.com/journal/2007/12/9/losing-your-
mind-its-your-white-matter-stupid.html.
Miroshnichenko, Andrey E., Aleksey A. Vasiliev and Sergey V. Dmitriev. “Solitons and Soliton
Collisions.” At http:// homepages.tversu.ru/~s000154/collision/main_r.html and/or www.mpipks-
dresden.mpg.de/~andreym/solitons/collision/main.html.
Mitchell, Edgar D. (1974) Psychic Exploration: A challenge for science, edited by John White. New
York: Putnam’s Sons.
Moffat, John W. (1979) “New theory of gravitation.” Phys. Rev. D 19: 3554–3558.
Moffat, John W. (1995) “Nonsymmetric Gravitational Theory.” Journal of Mathematical Physics 36,
7. At https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258068572. Also http://arXiv: gr-qc/9411006.
Moffat, John W. (1995) “A new nonsymmetric gravitational theory.” Physics Letters B 355: 447–
452.
Moore, Walter J. (1992) Schrödinger, life and thought. Cambridge University Press.
Morris, J.D., W.G. Roll and R.L. Morris, editors. (1977) Research in Parapsychology, 1976. London:
Scarecrow Press.
Nachalov, Yu.V. (2003) “The Basics of Torsion Mechanics.” Available online. Accessed 3
September 2007 at http://www.amasci.com/freenrg/tors/tors24.html.

46
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Nachalov, Yu.V. and E.A. Parkhomov. (2003) “Experimental detection of the torsion field.”
Accessed 29 September 2007 at http:// www.amasci.com/freenrg/tors/doc15.html.
Naselaris, Thomas, Kendrick N. Kay, Shinji Nishimoto and Jack L. Gallant. (2011) “Encoding
and decoding in fMRI.” Neuroimage 56: 400-410. At http://gallantlab.org/publications.
Newcomb, Simon. (1877) “Elementary theorems relating to the geometry of a space of three
dimensions and of uniform positive curvature in the fourth dimension.” Crelle’s Journal für die reine und
angewandte Mathematik 83: 293-299.
Newcomb, Simon. (1879) “Note on a Class of Transformations Which Surfaces May Undergo
in Space of More Than Three Dimensions.” American Journal of Mathematics 1: 1-4.
Newcomb, Simon. (1889) “On the Fundamental Concepts of Physics.” Abstract in the Bulletin
of the Washington Philosophical Society 11 (1888/1891): 514-515; A roughly typed copy of the complete
talk can be found in Box #94, Newcomb Papers, Library of Congress.
Nishimoto, Shinji, An T. Vu, Thomas Naselaris, Yuval Benjamini, Bin Yu and Jack L. Gallant.
(2011) “Reconstructing Visula Experiences from Brain Activity Evoked by Natural Movies.” Current
Biology 21, 19: 1641-1646. At http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.031. Also http://gallantlab.
org/publications/nishimoto-et-al-2011.html.
Pappas, Stephanie. (2014) “Strange New Type of Brain Cell Discovered” Live Science. Available
online at http://www.livescience.com/47958-new-brain-cell-discovered.html.
Pauli, Wolfgang. (1921) Theory of Relativity, translated by G. Field. New York: Dover, 1981;
Originally “Relativitätstheorie,” Encyklopädie de mathematischen Wissenschafter 19. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner,
1921.
Penrose, Roger. (1973) “Twistor theory: An approach to the quantisation of fields and space-
time.” Physics Reports 6, 4: 241-315.
Penrose, Roger. (1975) “Twistor theory - Its aims and achievements.” In Quantum gravity;
Proceedings of the Oxford Symposium, Harwell, Berkshire, England, February 15, 16, 1974. Oxford,
Clarendon Press, 1975: 268-407.
Penrose, Roger. (1989) Emperor’s New Mind. Oxford University Press.
Penrose, Roger. (1994) Shadows of the Mind. Oxford University Press.
Penrose, Roger. (2002) “Appendix” in Chisholm, M. Such Silver Currents: The story of William and
Lucy Clifford, 1845-1929. Cambridge, UK: Lutterworth Press.
Penrose, Roger. (2007) The Road to Reality: A complete guide to the laws of the universe. Vintage Books.
Persinger, Michael A. (2003) “Experimental simulation of the god experience: implications for
religious beliefs and the future of the human species.” In: R. Joseph, editor Neurotheology: Brain,
Science, Spirituality, Religious Experience. San Jose, CA: University Press: 267-284
Persinger, Michael A. (2003) “Neurobehavioral effects of brief exposures to weak intensity,
complex magnetic fields within experimental and clinical settings.” Magnetotherapy: potential therapeutic
benefits and adverse effects. M. J. McLean, S. Engstrom and R. R. Holocomb, editors. New York: TFG
Press: 89-118.
Peterson, Ivars. (1994) “A New Gravity? Challenging Einstein’s general theory of relativity.”
Science News 146 (3 December 1994): 376-378.
Podolanski, J. (1950) “Unified Field Theory in Six Dimensions.” Proceedings of the Royal Society
201: 234-260.
Pollack, Gerald A. (2001) Cells, Gels and the Engines of Life. Ebner and Sons.
Pollack, Gerald A. (2013) The Fourth Phase of Water: Beyond solid, liquid and vapor. Ebner and Sons.

47
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Popp, Fritz-Albert and Y. Yan. (2002) “Delayed luminescence of biological systems in terms of
coherent states.” Physics Letters A 293: 93-97.
Popp, Fritz-Albert, J.J. Chang, A. Herzog, Z. Yan and Y. Yan. (2002) “Evidence of non-
classical (squeezed) light in biological systems.” Physics Letters A 293: 98-102.
Popp, Fritz-Albert, Walburg Maric-Oehler, Klaus-Peter Schlebusch, Wolfgang Klimek. (2005)
“Evidence of Light Piping (Meridian-Like Channels) in the Human Body and Nonlocal EMF
Effects.” Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 24, 3: 359-374.
Popp, Fritz-Albert. (1979) “Photons and their importance to biology.” Proceedings of the
International Symposium on Wave Therapeutics - Interaction of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation with living
systems. Z.W. Wolkowski, editor. Versailles, 19.-20. Mai 1979. Université de Paris-Val de Marne,
Créteil 1983: 43–59.
Popp, Fritz-Albert. (1999) “About the coherence of biophotons.” Macroscopic Quantum Coherence,
Proceedings of an International Conference at Boston University. Boston University and MIT: World Scientific
Press. Available online at http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Consciousness_31.pdf.
Popp, Fritz-Albert., K.H. Li and Q. Gu, editors. (1992) Recent Advances in Biophoton Research and
Its Applications. World Scientific Press.
Pribram Karl H. (1987) “The Implicate Brain”. Quantum Implications: Essays in Honour of David
Bohm. B. J. Hiley and F. David Peat, editors. Routledge.
Pribram, Karl H. (1971) Languages of the brain: experimental paradoxes and principles in neuropsychology.
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Pribram, Karl H. (1991) Brain and Perception: Holonomy and Structure in Figural Processing. Hillsdale,
N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pribram, Karl. (1976) Consciousness and the Brain. New York: Plenum.
Pribram, Karl. (1991) Brain and perception: Holonomy and structure in figural processing. Hillsdale, N J:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates’
Prigogine, Ilya and G. Nicolis. (1977). Self-Organization in Non-Equilibrium Systems. Wiley.
Prigogine, Ilya. (1961) Introduction to Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, Second edition. New
York: Interscience.
Puharich, Andrija., editor, (1979) The Iceland Papers: Select Papers on Experimental and Theoretical
Research on the Physics of Consciousness. Amherst, Wisconsin: Essentia Research Associates.
Puthoff, Harold and Russell Targ. (1979) “Direct Perception of Remote Geographical
Locations.” Andrija Puharich, editor, The Iceland Papers. Essentia Research Associates: 17-48.
Puthoff, Harold and Russell Targ. (1997) Mind-Reach: Scientists Look at Psychic Abilities.
Charlottesville, NC: Hampton Roads.
Pylkkänen, Paavo and Tere Vaden, editors. (2001) Dimensions of Conscious Experience. John
Benjamins.
Quiroga, R. Quian, L. Reddy, G. Kreiman, C. Koch and I. Fried. (2005) “Invariant visual
representations by single neurons in the human brain.” Nature 435: 1102-1107. At
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03687.
Randall, Lisa and Raman Sundrum. (1999) “A Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra
Dimension.” Physical Review Letters 83: 3370-3373. At http://ArXiv: hep-ph/9905221.
Randall, Lisa and Raman Sundrum. (1999) “An alternative to compactification.” Physical Review
Letters 83: 4690-4693. At http://ArXiv: hep-th/9906064.

48
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Rauscher, Elizabeth A. (1979) “Some Physical Models Potentially Applicable to Remote

Perception.” Puharich. The Iceland Papers: 49-94.
Redd, Nola Taylor. (2018) “This Ghostly Galaxy Has Almost No Dark Matter.” Science and
Astronomy Defying Theories, Space.com (March 28, 2018) At https://www.space.com/40119-ghostly-
galaxy-almost-no-dark-matter.html.
Reed, Donald. (1998) “Torsion Field research.” New Energy News 6, 1: 22-24. At www.padrak.
com/ine/NEN_6_1_6.html.
Riemann, Bernhard. (1854, 1868, 1873) “Ueber die Hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu
Grunde liegen.” Habilitationsschrift at Göttingen University in 1854, Abhandlungen der Königlichen
Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, 13; The material from Riemann’s Nachlass published by
Heinrich Weber in the 2nd edition of Bernhard Riemann’s gesammelte mathematische Werke. (1861,
Gesammelte Mathematische Werke, Zweite Auflage); “On the hypotheses which lie at the
foundation of geometry” translated by W.K. Clifford, Nature 8 (1873); Reprinted in Clifford’s
Collected Mathematical Papers. London: Macmillan, 1882. Online at www.maths.tcd.ie/pub/HistMath/
People/Riemann/Geom/WKCGeom.html.
Roach, John. (2007) “Human Evolution Speeding Up, Study Says.” National Geographic News,
December 11, 2007. At http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/12/071211-human-
evolution.html
Rodger, Jennifer, et al. (2012) “Transcranial pulsed magnetic field stimulation facilitates
reorganization of abnormal neural circuits and corrects behavioral deficits without disrupting normal
connectivity.” The FASEB Journal. At http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.11-194878.
Rubakov, V.A. (2000) “Review of The Theory of the Physical Vacuum: Theory, Experiments,
and Technologies, by G I Shipov.” Uspekhi Fizicheskeshikh Nauk, Russian Academy of Sciences 170,
3 (2000): 351-352.
Sachs, Mendel. (1988) Einstein versus Bohr: The Continuing Controversies in Physics. La Salle, Illinois:
Open Court.
Sachs, Mendel. (1998) Dialogues on Modern Physics. River Edge, New Jersey: World Scientific
Publishing.
Sachs, Mendel. Quantum Mechanics from General Relativity: An Approximation for a Theory of Inertia.
Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1986.
Sauer, Tilman. (2007) “Einstein’s Unified Field Theory Program.” Einstein Papers Project. At
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/3293/1/uft.pdf.
Sauer, Tilman. (2007) “Field equations in teleparallel spacetime: Einstein’s Fernparallelismus
approach towards unified field theory.” At http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0405142.pdf.
Saxby, Frank R. (1945) “Unification of the Physical Fields.” Nature 151: 609-10.
Scholz, Erhard. (undated)“H. Weyl’s and E. Cartan’s proposal for infinitesimal geometry in the
early 1920s.” At http://www2.math.uni-wuppertal.de/~scholz/preprints/weyl_cartan.pdf.
Scholz, Erhard. (2005) “Curved spaces: Mathematics and Empirical evidence, ca. 1830-1923.”
Preprint at Wuppertal, http://mathg.uni-wuppertal.de/~scholz/preprints/ES_OW2005.pdf.
Shorter version to appear at Oberwalfach Reports.
Schrödinger, Erwin. (1944) “The Affine Connexion in Physical Field Theory.” Nature 53: 572-
575.
Schrödinger, Erwin. (1951, 1960) Space-Time Structure. Cambridge, England: At the University
Press.

49
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Schwarz, John H. (1997) “The Second Superstring Revolution.” 22 May 1997. At http://theory.
caltech.edu/people/jhs/strings/index.htm.
Schwarz, John. “Interview.” Davies and Brown. Superstrings: 70-89.
Science 2.0 News Staff. (2008) “Magnetic Water’s memory effect.” Scientific Blogging. At
http://www.science20.com/news_articles/magnetic_waters_memory_effect.
Scott, Alwyn C. and Stephen D. Luzader. (1979) “Coupled Solitary Waves in Neurophysics.”
Phys. Scr. 20: 395. At http//dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/20/3-4/014.
Sheldrake, Rupert. (1981, 2009) Morphic Resonance: The nature of formative causation. 2009 revision of
1981, A new science of life.
Sheldrake, Rupert. (1988) The Presence of the Past: Morphic resonance and the habits of nature. New
York: Vintage.
Shelton, Ray. (2016) “Scientists discovery a “dark” Milky Way.” Yale News (10/26/2018) At
https://news.yale.edu/2016/08/25/scientists-discover-dark-milky-way.
Shifflett, James. (2005) A modification of Einstein-Schrodinger theory that contains both general relativity
and electrodynamics. PhD dissertation. Available online at http://arxiv.org/pdf/0801.2307v2.pdf.
Shipov, G.I. (1977) “Obscherelrelyativistskiye nelineinyye spinornyye uravneniya.” Izvestiya
VUZ, seriya Fizika 3.
Shipov, G.I. (1979) “Problemy teorii elementarnykh vzaimodeistvii.” Moscow, Moscow State
University.
Shipov, G.I. (1993) Teoriya fizicheskogo vakuuma, (Theory of the Physical Vacuum). Moscow, NT-
Center: 362.
Siegfried, Tom. (2010) “Clash of the quantum titans.” Science News 178, 11: 15-21.
Smart, Ashley G. (2011) “Ultralow magnetic fields elicit unexplained spin dynamics in water.”
Physics Today 64, 10: 14, 16.
Smith, Cyril W. (2004) “Quanta and Coherence Effects in Water and Living Systems.” Journal of
Alternative and Complementary Medicine 10, 1: 69-78.
Stapp, Henry. (2009) Comments in a private conversation at the First Annual “Science of
Nonduality Conference”, 23-26 October, San Rafael, CA.
St-Pierre, L.S. and Michael A. Persinger. (2006) “Experimental facilitation of the sensed
presence is predicted by the specific patterns of the applied magnetic fields, not by suggestibility: Re-
analyses of 19 experiments.” International Journal of Neuroscience 116, 9: 1079–96. At http://dx.doi.org/
10.1080/00207450600808800.
Suzuki, D.T. (1934, 1948) An Introduction to Zen Buddhism. Kyoto: Eastern Buddhist Soc. 1934;
Republished with “Foreword” by C.G. Jung. London: Rider and Company, 1948.
Swaminathan, Nikhil. (2007) “Partial Recall: Why Memory Fades with Age.” Scientific American,
5. Accessed 5 October 2009, at http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=partial-recall-
why-memory-fades.
Talbot, Michael. (1991) The Holographic Universe. New York: Harper Perennial.
Targ, Russell and Harold E. Puthoff. (1977) Mind-Reach: Scientists Look at Psychic Ability.
Delacorte Press.
Targ, Russell, Harold E. Puthoff and Edwin C. May. (1977) “ Direct Perception of Remote
Geographical Locations.” Mind at Large. Tart, Puthoff and Targ: 77-106.
Tart, Charles T., Harold E. Puthoff and Russell Targ, editors. (1979) Mind at Large: Institute of
Electrical and Electronic Engineers Symposia on the Nature of Extrasensory Perception. New York: Praeger.

50
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Thaxton, Charles B., Walter L. Bradley and Roger L. Olsen. (1992) The Mystery of Life’s Origin:
Reassessing Current Theories, second edition. Dallas: Lewis and Stanley. At http://www.1dolphin.org/
mystery/chap7.html.
Tiller, William A. (1997) Science and Human Transformation: Subtle Energies, Intentionality and
Consciousness. Walnut Creek, California: Pavior Publishing.
Tiller, William A. (2006) “Towards a New Physics and Biology that includes consciousness”. In
Savely Savva, editor. Life and Mind: In search of the physical basis. Victoria, B.C.: Trafford.
Tiller, William A., W.E. Dibble Jr. and M.J. Kohane. (2001) Conscious Acts of Creation: The
Emergence of a New Physics. Walnut Creek, California: Pavior Publishing.
Tiller, William A., W.E. Dibble, R. Nunley and C.N. Shealy. (2004) “Towards General
Experimentation and Discovery in “Conditioned” Laboratory Spaces: Part I: Experimental pH-
Change Findings at Some Remote Sites.” At http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15025888 and
www.tillerfoundation.com/ToGenExpPart1.pdf.
Tiller, William A., Walter Dibble, C.T. Krebs. (2002) “Instrumental Response to Advanced
Kinesiology Treatments in a ‘Conditioned’ Space.” Subtle Energies and Energy Medicine 13, 2: 91-108.
Tiller, William A., Walter Dibble, Michael Kohane. (2002) “Exploring robust Interactions
between Human Intention and Inanimate/Animate Systems.” Subtle Energies and Energy Medicine 11,
3: 265-291.
Tonnelat, Marie Antoinette. (1966) Einstein’s Unified Field Theory. Translated by Richard Akerib.
New York: Gordon and Breach.
Tonnelat, Marie Antoinette. (1966) The Principles of Electrodynamic Theory and of Relativity.
Translated by A.J. Knodel. Dordrecht-Holland: D. Reidel.
Tuszynski, Jack A. and Nancy J. Woolf. (2006) “The Path Ahead”. Tuszynski. Emerging Physics:
1-24.
Tuszynski, Jack A., editor. (2006) The Emerging Physics of Consciousness. Germany: Springer.
Tyson, Peter. (2017) “Are We Still Evolving?” NOVA, Posted 12.14.09. Available at
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/evolution/are-we-still-evolving.html.
Van Dokkum, Pieter, Donna Weaver, Ray Villard. (2018) “Dark Matter Goes Missing in
Oddball Galaxy.” At https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2018/dark-matter-goes-missing-in-
oddball-galaxy.
Van Dokkum, Pieter, Roberto Abraham, Jean Brodie, Charlie Conroy, Shany Daniel, Allison
Merritt, Lamiya Mowla, Aaron Romanowsky, Jielai Zhang. “A high stellar velocity dispersion and ~
100 globular clusters for the ultra-diffuse galaxy Dragonfly 44.” Astrophysical Journal Letters 828, 1. At
http://arXiv:1606.06291v2 [astro-ph.GA] 15 July 2016. Also IOP Science, http://iopsience.iop.org/
article/10.3847/2041-8205/828/1/L6.
Van Dokkum, Pieter, Shany Danieli, Yotam Cohen, Allison Merritt, Aaron J. Romanowsky,
Roberto Abraham, Jean Brodie, Charlie Conroy, Deborah Lokhorst, Lamiya Mowla, Ewan
O’Sullivan, Jielai Zhang. (2018) “A galaxy lacking dark matter.” Nature 555, 629-632. At
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.10237.pdf.
Vergano, Dan. (2002) “A tiny particle could smash a big hole in physics theories.” USA Today
(31 July): 9D.
Wai, Jonathan. (2013) “More Proof That IQ Levels Are Rising.” Business Insider. At
http://www.businessinsider.com/the-number-of-gifted-students-is-rising-2013-1.
Walker, Evan Harris. (2000) The Physics of Consciousness. Basic Books.

51
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Wallace-Wells, David. (2019) “Jared Diamond: There’s a 49 Percent Chance the World as We
Know It Will End by 2050.” New York Magazine, Intelligencer, 10 May 2019. At http://nymag.com/
intelligencer/2019/05/jared-diamond-on-his-new-book-upheaval.html.
Watson, John B. (1913) “Psychology as the Behaviorist views it.” Psychology Review 20: 159-177.
Weber, Renée. “The Enfolding-Unfolding Universe: A Conversation with David Bohm.”
Wilber. The Holographic Paradigm: 44-104.
Weyl, Hermann. (1917) “Reine infinitesimale Geometrie.” Math. Zeitschrift Bd.2: 385-411; Also
(1918) 201-216.
Weyl, Hermann. (1918) “Gravitation und Electrizität.” Sitz. Ber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. 26: 465-480.
Translated as “Gravitation and Electricity.” In Einstein, et al. The Principles of Relativity. New York:
Dover, 1952.
Weyl, Hermann. (1918) Raum, Zeit, Materie. Translated by H.L. Brose as Space, Time, Matter.
London: Methuen, 1922; New York: Dover, 1952.
Weyl, Hermann. (1919) “Eine neue Erweitung der Relativitätstheorie.” Ann. d. Phys. 59: 101.
Weyl, Hermann. (1927, 1949) Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science; an enlarged English
version of a 1927 work Philosophie der Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften, and Symmetry (1952).
Whittaker, Edmund T. (1903) “On the Partial Differential Equations of Mathematical Physics.”
Math. Ann. 57: 333-355;
Whittaker, Edmund T. (1904) “On an Expression of the Electromagnetic Field Due to
Electrons by Means of Two Scalar Potential Functions.” Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 1: 367-372.
Margaret Wilson. (2002) “Six views of embodied cognition.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9 (4):
625-636.
Wikipedia (2017) “Georges Lemaitre”. Accessed 9/22/2017.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeorgesLema%C3%AEtre.
Wikipedia. (2012) “Torsion Field (Pseudoscience)”. Last modified 2 March 2012. Downloaded
5 March 2012.
Wikipedia. (2016) “Amplituhedron”. Accessed 1 September 2016. Available at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amplituhedron
Wikipedia. (2017) “Biophoton”. At https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biophoton.
Wikipedia. (2017) “Body Memory”. At https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BodyMemory; Robert
Todd Carroll. (2017) “Cellular Memory”. The Skeptic’s Dictionary. Posted 9/26/2017. Available at
http://skepdic.com/cellular.html.
Wikipedia. (2017) “Cortico-Muscular Coherence.” Downloaded 9/21/2017.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corticomuscular_coherence 2/
Wikipedia. (2017) “Fred Hoyle”. Accessed 9/22//2017. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
FredHoyle.
Wikipedia. (2017) “The ten percent brain myth”. At https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_
percent_of_the_brain_myth.
Wikipedia. (2017) “George Cantor”. At https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Cantor.
Wikipedia. (2102) “Neuron”. Last Modified 10 March 2012. Accessed 10 March 2012.
Wilber, Ken. Ed. (1982) The Holographic Paradigm and Other Paradoxes: Exploring the Leading Edge of
Science. Boston: Shambhala.
Wilson, William. (1928) “Relativity and Wave Mechanics.” Proceedings of the Royal Society 118: 441-
448.

52
 Jim Beichler ASCSI/SFF Conference Presentation 6 October 2018

Witten, Edward. “Interview.” Davies and Brown. Superstrings: 90-106.

Wolfgang Pauli. (1921) Theory of Relativity, translated by G. Field. New York: Dover, 1981;
Originally “Relativitätstheorie,” Encyklopädie de mathematischen Wissenschafter 19. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner,
1921.
Woolf, Nancy. (2006) “Microtubules in the Cerebral Cortex: Role in Memory and
Consciousness.” In Tuszynski, Emerging Physics of Consciousness: 49-94.
Woolf, Nancy. (2007) “From Neuronanotechnology to Cure Criminality and Mental Illness.”
The Journal of Geoethical Nanotechnology 2, 2. At http://www.terasemjournals.org/GN0202/
Woolf_c.html.
Woolf, Nancy. (2007) “Microtubules in the Cerebral Cortex: Role in Memory and
Consciousness”. In Tuszynksi, Emerging Physics of Consciousness: 49-94.
Woollacott, Emma. (2012) “‘Telepathy machine’ close to reality, say scientists.” At http://www.
tgdaily.com/trendwatch-features/61154-telepathy-machine-close-to-reality-say-scientists.
Yirka, Bob. (2012) “Research suggests cells communicate via biophotons.” Phys.org Blog. Posted
23 May 2012. At https://phys.org/news/2012-05-cells-biophotons.html.
Zukerman, Wendy. (2012) “Prune bad brain wiring with magnetic pulses.” New Scientist. 21
February 2012. At http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21328524.600-prune-bad-brain-wiring-
with-magnetic-pulses.html.

53