0% found this document useful (0 votes)
258 views

MODULE 6 Apportionment

1. The document discusses two methods of apportionment: Hamilton Plan and Jefferson Plan. The Hamilton Plan uses a standard divisor and quota to allocate representatives, while the Jefferson Plan uses trial and error to find a standard divisor that allocates the total number of representatives. 2. An example shows how to apply the Hamilton Plan to allocate 25 representatives among 5 cities based on population. 3. Another example then shows how the Jefferson Plan would allocate the same 25 representatives, using a different standard divisor through trial and error.

Uploaded by

3 dots . . .
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
258 views

MODULE 6 Apportionment

1. The document discusses two methods of apportionment: Hamilton Plan and Jefferson Plan. The Hamilton Plan uses a standard divisor and quota to allocate representatives, while the Jefferson Plan uses trial and error to find a standard divisor that allocates the total number of representatives. 2. An example shows how to apply the Hamilton Plan to allocate 25 representatives among 5 cities based on population. 3. Another example then shows how the Jefferson Plan would allocate the same 25 representatives, using a different standard divisor through trial and error.

Uploaded by

3 dots . . .
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13

GEMMW

Mathematics in the Modern World

MODULE 6: APPORTIONMENT

Learning Outcomes:

At the end of this module, the students should be able to:

1. Compare and contrast the different apportionment methods.

2. Use mathematical concepts and tools in apportionment.

3. Apply the different methods of apportionment.

4. Evaluate the fairness criteria in apportionment.

APPORTIONMENT

Apportionment is a method of allocating or distributing a whole proportionally


into various parts.

There are two (2) methods that can be used in apportionment. These are
Hamilton Plan and Jefferson Plan.

1. Hamilton Plan
- A method which is based on standard divisor and standard quota of the
population.

𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 (𝑃)


𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑 𝐷𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑜𝑟 (𝑆𝐷) =
𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛

𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑃


𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑 𝑄𝑢𝑜𝑡𝑎 (𝑆𝑄) =
𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑 𝐷𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑜𝑟

*Where the highest SQ is only rounded up to a whole number


once the total number of allocation is reached.

Example:

Use Hamilton plan to divide the total population of 20 000 of Anapolis by the
number of 25 representatives. The number of representatives is to be apportioned
according to the states’ respective populations.
State Population
Sagittarius 12 311
Libra 1 798
Capricorn 1 581
Virgo 2 917
Gemini 1 393
Total 20 000

Solution:

𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 (𝑃) 20 000


𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑 𝐷𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑜𝑟 (𝑆𝐷 ) = = = 800
𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 25

𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑃


𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑 𝑄𝑢𝑜𝑡𝑎 (𝑆𝑄) =
𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑 𝐷𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑜𝑟

State Population Standard Quota Number of Representatives

12 311
Sagittarius 12 311 𝑆𝑄 = = 15.38875 15 15
800
1 798
Libra 1 798 𝑆𝑄 = = 2.2475 2 2
800
1 581
Capricorn 1 581 𝑆𝑄 = = 1.97625 1 2
800
2 917
Virgo 2 917 𝑆𝑄 = = 3.64625 3 4
800
1 393
Gemini 1 393 𝑆𝑄 = = 1.74125 1 2
800

Total 20 000 22 25

Therefore, using Hamilton plan, Sagittarius should have 15 representatives;


Libra, Capricorn, and Gemini should have 2 representatives each; and there should
be 4 representatives from Virgo.
2. Jefferson Plan
- This method uses a trial and error value for the standard divisor. This value is
chosen so that the sum of the standard quotas is equal to the required
number of allocations.

Example:
Using the first example, compute for the allocated representatives for each
state using the Jefferson plan.

Solution:
Supposing the standard divisor to be used is 750.

Number of
State Population Standard Quota
Representatives
12 311
Sagittarius 12 311 𝑆𝑄 = = 16.4147 16
750
1 798
Libra 1 798 𝑆𝑄 = = 2.3973 2
750
1 581
Capricorn 1 581 𝑆𝑄 = = 2.108 2
750
2 917
Virgo 2 917 𝑆𝑄 = = 3.8893 3
750
1 393
Gemini 1 393 𝑆𝑄 = = 1.8573 1
750

Total 20 000 24

NOTE: a. If the total number of representatives is lesser than the


target number, use another standard divisor which is lesser
than the first divisor being used.
b. If the total number of representatives is greater than the
target number, use another standard divisor which is greater
than the first divisor being used.

Since, 24 is less than 25, another standard divisor, which is lesser than the
first, is to be used.
Solution 2:
Suppose that 725 is the standard divisor that will be used.

Number of
State Population Standard Quota
Representatives
12 311
Sagittarius 12 311 𝑆𝑄 = = 16.9806 16
725
1 798
Libra 1 798 𝑆𝑄 = = 2.48 2
725
1 581
Capricorn 1 581 𝑆𝑄 = = 2.1806 2
725
2 917
Virgo 2 917 𝑆𝑄 = = 4.0234 4
725
1 393
Gemini 1 393 𝑆𝑄 = = 1.9213 1
725

Total 20 000 25

Therefore, in using the Jefferson plan, there should be 16 representatives


from Sagittarius, 2 representatives from Libra and Capricorn, 4 representatives from
Virgo and 1 representative from Gemini.
Name:______________________________________Score:_________________
Section:_____________________________________Date:__________________

Activity 1
Methods in Apportionment

Suppose that the 18 members of the board of the County Environmental


Organization are selected according to the populations of the five cities in the county,
as shown in the table below.
a. Use the Hamilton method to determine the number of board members
each city should have.
b. Use the Jefferson method to determine the number of board members
each city should have.

City Population
Pacific 5 290
Puma 3 720
Villa 1 540
Osana 2 430
Cardinal 7 020
Total ?
Fairness in Apportionment
This is used to determine in which subset an additional representative or
allocation should be given.

In this, average constituency, absolute, and relative unfairness of


apportionment, are to be used.

• Average Constituency – an essential aspect of democracy. The population


is divided by the number of allocations from the subset.

𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑡


𝐴𝑣𝑒. 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦 =
𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑡

Example:
Consider the two cities in the table below.

Average
City Population Representatives
Constituency
8 340
Taguig City 8 340 5 = 1 668
5
16 000
Quezon City 16 000 10 = 1 600
10

Now suppose that one representative will be added to one of the cities.
Which city is more deserving of the new representative? In other words, to be
fair, which city should receive the new representative?

Solution:

Average Constituency Average Constituency


City
(Old) (New – Add 1 Rep)
8 340 8 340
Taguig City = 1 668 = 1 390
5 6
16 000 16 000
Quezon City = 1 600 = 1 455
10 11

• Absolute Unfairness of an Apportionment – the positive difference


between the average constituency of a subset A and the average
constituency of subset B.
Taguig City’s Quezon City’s Absolute
Average Average Unfairness of
Constituency Constituency Apportionment
If Taguig City
will receive the 1 390 1 600
1 600 – 1 390 = 210
additional (New) (Old)
representative
If Quezon City
will receive the 1 668 1 455
1 668 – 1 455 = 213
additional (Old) (New)
representative

• Relative Unfairness of an Apportionment – the quotient of the absolute


unfairness of the apportionment and the average constituency of the subset
receiving an additional allocation.

Absolute Average Relative


Unfairness of Constituency Unfairness of
Apportionment (New) Apportionment
If Taguig City
will receive the 210
210 1 390 = 0.1510
additional 1 390
representative
If Quezon City
will receive the 213
213 1 455 = 0.1464
additional 1 455
representative

Note: When adding an allocation to a subset of a population, the


allocation is assigned to the subset with the smallest relative
unfairness of apportionment.

Since Quezon City has the smallest relative unfairness of apportionment, the
additional representative will be given to this city.
Name:______________________________________Score:_________________
Section:_____________________________________Date:__________________

Activity 2
Fairness in Apportionment

The table below shows the number of fourth and fifth grade teachers in a
school district and the number of students in each of those grades. If a new teacher
is hired, use the apportionment principle to determine to which grade the teacher
should be assigned.

Grade Level Number of Teachers Number of Students


Fourth Grade 551 12 731
Fifth Grade 512 15 943
Another method that can be used, to show fairness in apportionment, is the
Huntington-Hill method.

• Huntington-Hill Apportionment Method – is a method of equal proportions.


A Huntington-Hill Number is needed, which can be gotten using the formula
blow.

𝑝2
𝐻=
𝑎(𝑎 + 1)

* p is the population of the subset


* a is the number of allocations for that subset

Note: The additional allocation should be given to the subset with the
greatest Huntington-Hill number.

Example:
The table below shows the numbers of lifeguards that are assigned to three
different beaches and the numbers of rescues made by lifeguards at those beaches.
Use the Huntington-Hill apportionment principle to determine to which beach a new
lifeguard should be assigned.

Beach Number of Lifeguards Number of Rescues


X 37 1 272
Y 51 1 437
Z 24 898

Solution:

Number of Number of 𝒑𝟐
Beach 𝑯=
Lifeguards Rescues 𝒂(𝒂 + 𝟏)
(1 272)2
X 37 1 272 = 1 150.7709
37(37 + 1)
(1 437)2
Y 51 1 437 = 778.6459
51(51 + 1)
(898)2
Z 24 898 = 1 344.0066
24(24 + 1)

Since Beach Z has the highest Huntington-Hill number, the additional


lifeguard will be given to this beach.
Name:______________________________________Score:_________________
Section:_____________________________________Date:__________________

Activity 3
Huntington-Hill Apportionment Method

A university has a president’s council that is composed of students from each


of the undergraduate classes. If a new student representative is added to the
council, use the Huntington-Hill apportionment principle to determine which class the
new student council member should represent.

Grade Level Number of Representatives Number of Students


First Year 12 2 015
Second Year 10 1 755
Third Year 9 1 430
Fourth Year 8 1 309
Name:______________________________________Score:_________________
Section:_____________________________________Date:__________________

Activity 4
Apportionment

1. A total of 25 teacher aides are to be apportioned among seven (7) classes at


a new elementary school. The enrolment in the seven classes is shown in the
table below. Use: (a) Hamilton and (b) Jefferson Principle to determine the
number of teacher aides to be assigned in each class.

Classes Number of Students


Kinder 38
Grade 1 39
Grade 2 35
Grade 3 27
Grade 4 21
Grade 5 31
Grade 6 33
Total 224

2. The table below shows the number of sales associates and the average
number of customers per day at a company’s two department stores. The
company is planning to add a new sales associate to one of the stores. Use
the apportionment principle to determine which store should receive the new
employee.

Shopping Mall Number of Sales Average number of


Location Associates customers
Summer Hill Galleria 587 5 289
Seaside Mall Galleria 614 6 215
3. The table below shows the numbers of interns and the average number of
patients admitted each day at two different hospitals. Use the Huntington-Hill
apportionment principle to determine to which hospital a new intern should be
assigned.

Average number of
Hospital Number of Interns
patients admitted
A 128 518
B 145 860
References:

Sirug, W. S. (2018). Mathematics in the Modern World

Aufmann, R. (2017), Mathematics in the Modern World

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWfEqWLz9pc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weGGVmy9yLc&t=329s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l74j-auLjZE

You might also like