Mba-Iii-Compenations & Benefits Notes
Mba-Iii-Compenations & Benefits Notes
asia 1
Objectives
• To discuss the strategic importance of compensation to the achievement of organizational
goals. And the identify links between compensation objectives and business strategy.
• Discuss the role of compensation in attracting, motivating, and retaining a high-quality
workforce.
• Discuss recent theoretical and practical developments in the area of compensation and benefits.
• Develop the basic competencies required for the development and management of
compensation systems.
• Discuss how compensation management can become a competitive advantage.
• Discuss the role of compensation management as part of the new mandate for HR executives.
Module 1: (6 Hours)
Introduction To Compensation: Definition of Compensation, The Pay Model, Strategic Pay
Policies, Strategic Perspectives of Pay, Strategic Pay Decisions, Best Practices vs. Best Fit
Options
Module 2: (6 Hours)
Defining Internal Alignment: Definition of Internal Alignment, Internal Pay Structures,
Strategic Choices In Internal Alignment Design, Which Internal Structure Fits Best?
Module 3: (10 Hours)
Job Analysis and Evaluation: Why Perform Job Analysis?, Job Analysis Procedures, Job
Analysis Data Collection Process, Job Descriptions, Definition of Job Evaluation, Major
Decisions In Job Evaluation, Job Evaluation Methods, Final Result – Pay Structure
Module 4: (8 Hours)
Determining External Competitiveness and Benefits Management: Competitiveness:
Definition of Competitiveness, Pay Policy Alternatives, Wage Surveys, Interpreting Survey
Results, Pay Policy Line, Pay Grades
Benefits: Benefits Determination Process, Value of Benefits, Legally Required Benefits,
Retirement, Medical, & Other Benefits
Module 6: (8 Hours)
Legal & Administrative Issues in Compensation: Legal Issues, Pay Discrimination,
Comparable Worth, Budgets and Administration
Module 7: (8 Hours)
Global Compensation: Recognizing Variations, Social Contract, Culture & Pay, Strategic
Choices In Global Compensation, Comparing Systems, Expatriate Pay
Practical Components
• Students must prepare a comprehensive compensation plan to be offered to a Sales Executive,
A General Manager and The CEO of an organization.
• Students to collect information from an IT organization regarding the Cost To Company of an
employee.
• Students have to prepare questionnaire for conducting wage survey and carry out wage survey
for any selected sector and prepare a report for the same.
Solve various case studies.
• Students must compare and analyze compensation practices in different countries.
• Students to calculate the bonus amount eligible to an employee working as a HR Executive for
the past 10 years in a automobile manufacturing organization.
RECOMMENDED BOOKS:
• Compensation & Reward Management, BD Singh, 2 nd edition, Excel BOOKS, 2012,
ISBN: 9350620111, 9789350620113
• Compensation, Milkovich & Newman, 6 th edition, Irwin/McGraw-Hill, ISBN:
0256259658, 9780256259650
• Compensation and Benefit Design, Bashker D. Biswas, FT Press, 2012, ISBN:
0133064859, 9780133064858
• An Introduction to Executive Compensation, Steven Balsam, Academic Press, 2002,
ISBN: 0080490425, 9780080490427
REFERENCE BOOKS:
• Strategic Compensation, Joseph J. Martocchio, 3rd Edition, Prentice Hall, 2004, ISBN:
0131918737, 9780131918733
• Compensation Management in a Knowledge based world, Richard I. Anderson, 10th
edition, Pearson Education
• Compensation Management, Er Soni Shyam Singh, Excel Books, ISBN: 8174465766,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
7 Global Compensation 72
Module 1
Introduction To Compensation: Definition of Compensation, The Pay Model, Strategic Pay
Policies, Strategic Perspectives of Pay, Strategic Pay Decisions, Best Practices vs. Best Fit
Options
Defining Compensation
Compensation, or pay (the words are used interchangeably in this book), refers to all forms of
financial returns and tangible services and benefits employees receive as part of an employment
relationship.
Compensation (also known as Total Rewards) can be defined as all of the rewards earned by
employees in return for their labour. This includes:
Direct financial compensation consisting of pay received in the form of wages, salaries,
bonuses and commissions provided at regular and consistent intervals
Indirect financial compensation including all financial rewards that are not included in
direct compensation and understood to form part of the social contract between the
employer and employee such as benefits, leaves, retirement plans, education, and
employee services
Non-financial compensation referring to topics such as career development and
advancement opportunities, opportunities for recognition, as well as work environment
and conditions
While employees tend to focus on direct financial compensation when contemplating their
rewards, according to the McKinsey Journal, for individuals who are relatively satisfied with
their salary, it is the non-financial rewards that tend to be more effective in contributing to long-
term employee engagement.
Pay Model
Pay model or the compensation model varies from industry to organizations. Each and every
industry has their own pay model which is generally based on three components. The basic
components of pay model are:-
1. Compensation motives
2. Compensation Strategies
3. Compensation Techniques
Compensation Motives
Compensation or pay systems are programmed and are formalized to attain organization motives
and common motives according to which lead growth of company objectives. The basic
objectives are:-
• Efficiency in performance
Firstly it helps in improving performance, increasing quality and satisfying customers need with
controlling labor costs.
Initially designing a pay system which will help in managing and recognizing employee’s
contribution and its need. Equity pay system is the basic pay method which portrays equal fair
pay for a day work. This pay system ensures equal pay to the employees.
Pay model should always be according to the various central and state wage legislations and
regulations. As the rules and regulations of pay model changes or fluctuates so the compensation
system always to be accustomed accordingly.
PAY TECHNIQUES
Pay Techniques are used to devise new methods in the payment structure within the
organization. Technique is basically formalized and ties with the four major policies to pay
objectives. Though the sequence of techniques is used to analysis various kinds of techniques
with proper sequence first technique is of internal alignment which is based upon and give detail
analysis about amount of work accomplished and amount of work need to be accomplished.
Secondly, information about of the employee and the job profile is collected, organized and
evaluated and based upon these evaluations, a work structure is designed.
With the tremendous growth and complexities in organization regarding pay structures the
specific pay model devised by HR practitioner Milkovich. Reasons to follow this model are-:
1. The pay structure determines relation among job and skills and competency within an
organization.
2. Pay model is based upon work’s importance in achieving the organization’s motives.
3. The clarity and equality in the pay model devise the employee attitude towards the
organization and its rules and regulations.
4. The pay techniques in the pay model help to define the relevant labor markets in which the
employer competes, and use that information with the organization’s policy to derive a pay
structure.
5. Another importance of the pay model is that it controls the efficiency of organization and
helps to retain and motivate its workforce and labor costs.
6. Competition at external level helps in devising a pay level according to the pay structure paid
by competitors for the same level of job. Various forms of pay and benefits along with annuity
funds paid, apart from these funds what are the other benefits paid like contributions through
seniority pay increase, stock options, performance based approaches, retention moves, attract
new people and motivate the existing ones.
Internal Alignment: Internal alignment refers to comparisons between jobs or skill levels inside
a single organization. Jobs and people’s skills are compared in terms of their relative
contributions
to the organization’s objectives. How, for example, does the work of the programmer compare
with the work of the systems analyst, the software engineer, and the software architect? Does one
contribute to providing solutions to customers and satisfying shareholders more than another?
Does one require more knowledge or experience than another? Internal alignment refers to the
pay rates both for employees doing equal work and for those doing dissimilar work. In fact,
deter-mining what is an appropriate difference in pay for people performing different work is one
of
the key challenges facing managers. Internal alignment policies affect all three compensation
objectives. Pay relationships within the organization affect employee decisions to stay with the
organization, to become more flexible by investing in additional training, or to seek greater
responsibility. By motivating employees to choose increased training and greater responsibility
in dealing with customers, pay relationships indirectly affect the capabilities of the workforce
and hence the efficiency of the entire organization. Fairness is affected in employees’
comparisons of their pay to the pay of others in the organization. Basic fairness is provided by
Canadian human rights laws, which make paying on the basis of race, gender, age, and other
grounds, illegal.
External Competitiveness: External competitiveness refers to compensation relationships
external to the organization; i.e., comparison with competitors. How should an employer position
its pay relative to what competitors are paying? How much do we wish to pay accountants in
comparison to what other employers would pay them? What mix of pay forms—base, incentives,
stock, benefits—will help achieve the compensation objectives? Employers have several policy
options. Medtronic’s policy is to pay competitively in its market based on its financial perfor-
mance versus the financial performance of its competitors, while AES’s policy is to expect
people
to be willing to take less to join the company.
Increasingly, organizations claim their pay systems are market driven, i.e., based almost
exclusively on what competitors pay. However, “market driven” gets translated into practice in
different ways. Some employers may set their pay levels higher than their competition, hoping to
attract the best applicants. Of course, this assumes that someone is able to identify and hire the
“best” from the pool of applicants.
What mix of pay forms a company uses is also part of its external competitive policy. Medtronic
sets its base pay to match its competitors but ties incentives to performance. Plus it offers stock
options to all its employees to promote a culture of ownership. The assumption is that owners
will pay closer attention to the business. Further, Medtronic believes its benefits, particularly the
emphasis on programs that balance work and life, make it a highly attractive place to work.
Dept of MBA, SJBIT Page 7
Smartworld.asia 8
Medtronic believes it is how it positions its pay, and what forms it uses, that gives it an
advantage over its competitors. A Medtronic competitor, say MDS, may offer lower base pay but
greater opportunity to work overtime or fatter bonuses. AES believes making all employees
stockholders is consistent with its emphasis on social responsibility.
External competitiveness decisions—both how much, and what forms—have a twofold effect
on objectives: (1) to ensure that the pay is sufficient to attract and retain employees—if
employees do not perceive their pay as competitive in comparison to what other organizations
are offering for similar work, they may be more likely to leave—and (2) to control labour costs
so that the organization’s prices of products or services can remain competitive. Thus, external
competitiveness directly affects both efficiency and fairness. And it must do so in a way that
complies with relevant legislation.
Employee Contributions: The policy on employee contributions refers to the relative emphasis
placed on performance. Should one programmer be paid differently from another if one has bet-
ter performance and/or greater seniority? Or should all employees share in the organization’s
financial success (or failure) via incentives based on profit? Perhaps more productive teams of
employees should be paid more than less productive teams.
The degree of emphasis to be placed on performance is an important policy decision, since it
directly affects employees’ attitudes and work behaviours. Employers with strong pay-for-per-
formance policies are more likely to place greater emphasis on incentives and merit pay.
Starbucks
emphasizes stock options and sharing the success of corporate performance with the employees.
General Electric emphasizes performance at the unit, division, and companywide level.
Recognition of contributions also affects fairness, since employees need to understand the basis
for judging performance in order to believe that their pay is fair.
Administration: Policy regarding administration of the pay system is the last building block in
our model. Although it is possible to design a system that is based on internal alignment, external
competitiveness, and employee contributions, the system will not achieve its objectives unless it
is managed properly.
The greatest system design in the world is useless without competent management. Managers
choose what forms of pay to include and how to position pay against competitors. They must
communicate with employees and judge whether the system is achieving its objectives. They
must ask, Are we able to attract skilled workers? Can we keep them? Do our employees feel our
system is fair? Do they understand how their pay is determined? How do the better-performing
firms, with better financial returns and a larger share of the market, pay their employees? Are the
systems used by these firms different from those used by less successful firms? How do our
labour costs compare to our competitors? Answers to these questions are necessary in order to
tune or redesign the system, to adjust to changes, and to highlight potential areas for further
investigation. At AES, there is no compensation department, nor even a human resources
management department. Instead, teams of employees make all the compensation decisions. The
assumption is that this approach will ensure that everyone feels they are being treated fairly.
De-emphasize differences.
Use egalitarian pay structures, cross-train employees to handle many jobs, and call
employees partners
Competitiveness:
How should total compensation be positioned against our competitors? What forms of
compensation should we use?
Starbucks:
Pay just slightly above other fast-food employers.
Provide health insurance and stock options for all
employees (including part-timers).
Give everyone a free pound of coffee every week.
Contributions:
Should pay increases be based on individual and/or team performance, on experience and/or
continuous learning, on improved skills, on changes in cost of living, on personal needs, and/or
on each business unit’s performance?
Starbucks:
Administration:
How open and transparent should pay decisions be to all employees? Who should be involved in
designing and managing the system?
Starbucks:
As members of the Starbuck’s “family,” our employees realize what is best for them.
Partners can and do get involved
Pay decisions refer to the methods used by human resources and payroll professionals to choose
the pay scales of employees. Techniques that assist payroll professionals in making their pay
decisions include:
External measures such as benchmarking (salary surveys) and ongoing reporting that
constitute a market survey approach.
Internal measures such as projections, simulations, and predictive modeling or the use of
pay grades use an organization's needs to assess the relative value of tasks within it.
Variable systems like pay-for-performance create a policy line that connects job pay and
job evaluation points.
Benchmarking
Benchmarking is when an organization compares its own pay practices and job functions against
those of its competitors. Obvious cautionary points in the use of these kinds of salary surveys
include the inclusion of only appropriately similar peers in the comparison, the inclusion of only
appropriately similar jobs in the comparison, and accurately weigh and combining rates of pay
when multiple surveys are used.
There are two types of salary surveys that can be used in benchmarking: labor market
comparisons and product market comparisons. Labor market comparisons are best when
employee recruitment and retention is a major concern for the employer and when recruiting
costs are a significant expense. Product market comparisons are more salient when labor
expenses make up a major share of the employer's total expenses, when product demand is very
fluid, when the labor supply is relatively steady, and/or when employee skills are specific to the
product market in question.
Within the benchmarking process, the job category and range of pay rates within it are important
to the payroll professional. Certain key jobs are very common to organizations in a given field
and have a relatively stable set of duties. As a result, key jobs are useful in benchmarking since
they allow for more accurate comparison across many organizations. Non-key jobs are unique to
their organizations and are therefore not useful in benchmarking. Job content is far more
important than job title in this context, although it is easy to confuse content for title. Range of
pay rates refers to the variety in pay rates that workers in one job area might receive.
Salary Surveys
The use of salary surveys demands credible survey sources with multiple participating
organizations. Organizations responding to a given survey must be similar to the organization
using that survey. Close attention to job function is also crucial; it is inappropriate to match and
compare salaries based on job title alone.
Internal Measures
Benchmarking uses external measures to make internal pay decisions. Internal measures are also
available in most cases, and include the use of analytic techniques such as projections,
simulations, and predictive modeling in the pay decision-making process. External and internal
measures have very different focuses. External measures ask the market what any given
individual should be paid. Internal measures correlate pay decisions to potential organizational
benefits.
Connected to this problem is the fact that an existing pay scale can reward skill sets that were
highly useful to the organization in the past more than skill sets that are currently needed.
Projections, simulations, and predictive modeling assist in counteracting these issues, as they
make use of an organization's own internal data to ensure that assessments of value and need are
accurate.
Variable pay decision systems like pay-for-performance are designed to motivate employees and
ensure intra-organizational cooperation. When designing this kind of system, the first thing to
assess is the personnel goals of the organization (as this kind of system can be tailored
significantly). Interacting with managers across departments can help payroll professionals
understand what is most important to the various areas of the organization at any given time.
Merit and incentive pay programs are common forms of pay-for-performance systems.
Promotions based on performance rather than set time periods are also critical to pay-for-
performance schemes.
Module 2: (6 Hours)
Defining Internal Alignment: Definition of Internal Alignment, Internal Pay Structures, Strategic
Choices In Internal Alignment Design, Which Internal Structure Fits Best?
Economic Pressures
Early theorists concentrated on the supply of labour to explain pay structures with the most
famous being marginal productivity theory
Govt policies & regulations
" human rights legislation forbids pay systems that discriminate on the basis of gender, race,
religion, sexual orientation, national origin and many other grounds. pay equity acts require
equal pay for work of equal value,’ based on skill, effort, responsibility, and working conditions.
'Much pay related legislation attempts to regulate economic forces to achieve social welfare
objects. The most obvious place to affect an internal structure is at the minimums (minimum
wage legislation) and maximums (special reporting requirements for executive pay)
Stakeholders:
Unions, stakeholders, and political groups all have a stake in formulating internal pay structures.
Unions seek small pay differences among jobs and seniority based promotions as a way to
promote solidarity among members.
Cultures "and Customs
Culture is the mental programming for processing information that people share in common.
Such shared mindsets may form a judgement of what is “fair”.
Organisation Strategy
The basic belief of a strategic perspective is that pay structures that are not aligned with the
organization strategy may become obstacles to the organization’s success.
Organisation Human Capital
A major influence on internal structures human capital-are education, experience, knowledge,
abilities and skills. The stronger the link between skills, experience and an organization’s
strategic objective, the more pay those skills will command.
Organisation Design of Work
!echnology used to produce goods and services influences the organization design, work to be
performed and skills required performing it.
Overall HR Policies
The amount of pay tied to a promotion, the nature of promotions, i.e. the lateral, development,
and greater responsibilities) pay differences must be consistent with what the organization is
trying to accomplish.
We need to understand how differentials within the career path support work flow. The next
several chapters discuss how these internal structures (the levels, differentials, and criteria) are
designed and managed.
"In practice, the decision about which structures best fits a particular business strategy probably
lies in our original definition of internal alignment: An internally aligned structure supports the
work flow, is fair to employees, and directs their behaviour toward organization objectives.
It mainly depends on:
Job Analysis:
A job is defined as a collection of duties and responsibilities which are given together to an individual
employee. Job analysis is the process of studying and collecting information relating to operations and
responsibilities of a specific job.
Job analysis (also known as work analysis) is a family of procedures to identify the content of a job in
terms of activities involved and attributes or job requirements needed to perform the activities. Job
analysis provide information to organizations which helps to determine which employees are best fit for
specific jobs. Through job analysis, the analyst needs to understand what the important tasks of the job
are, how they are carried out, and the necessary human qualities needed to complete the job successfully.
Duties and Tasks The basic unit of a job is the performance of specific tasks and duties.
Information to be collected about these items may include: frequency, duration, effort,
skill, complexity, equipment, standards, etc.
Environment This may have a significant impact on the physical requirements to be able
to perform a job. The work environment may include unpleasant conditions such as
offensive odors and temperature extremes. There may also be definite risks to the
incumbent such as noxious fumes, radioactive substances, hostile and aggressive people,
and dangerous explosives.
Tools and Equipment Some duties and tasks are performed using specific equipment
and tools. Equipment may include protective clothing. These items need to be specified
in a Job Analysis.
Relationships Supervision given and received. Relationships with internal or external
people.
Requirements The knowledges, skills, and abilities (KSA's) required to perform the job.
While an incumbent may have higher KSA's than those required for the job, a Job
Analysis typically only states the minimum requirements to perform the job.
training content
Compensation
Job Analysis can be used in compensation to identify or determine:
skill levels
compensable job factors
work environment (e.g., hazards; attention; physical effort)
responsibilities (e.g., fiscal; supervisory)
required level of education (indirectly related to salary level)
Selection Procedures
Job Analysis can be used in selection procedures to identify or develop:
Performance Review
Job Analysis can be used in performance review to identify or develop:
Identification of Job Analysis Purpose: Well any process is futile until its purpose is
not identified and defined. Therefore, the first step in the process is to determine its need
and desired output. Spending human efforts, energy as well as money is useless until HR
managers don’t know why data is to be collected and what is to be done with it.
Who Will Conduct Job Analysis: The second most important step in the process of job
analysis is to decide who will conduct it. Some companies prefer getting it done by their
own HR department while some hire job analysis consultants. Job analysis consultants
may prove to be extremely helpful as they offer unbiased advice, guidelines and methods.
They don’t have any personal likes and dislikes when it comes to analyze a job.
How to Conduct the Process: Deciding the way in which job analysis process needs to
be conducted is surely the next step. A planned approach about how to carry the whole
process is required in order to investigate a specific job.
Strategic Decision Making: Now is the time to make strategic decision. It’s about
deciding the extent of employee involvement in the process, the level of details to be
collected and recorded, sources from where data is to be collected, data collection
methods, the processing of information and segregation of collected data.
Training of Job Analyst: Next is to train the job analyst about how to conduct the
process and use the selected methods for collection and recoding of job data.
Thus, the process of job analysis helps in identifying the worth of specific job, utilizing the
human talent in the best possible manner, eliminating unneeded jobs and setting realistic
performance measurement standards.
Observation Method: A job analyst observes an employee and records all his performed
and non-performed task, fulfilled and un-fulfilled responsibilities and duties, methods,
ways and skills used by him or her to perform various duties and his or her mental or
emotional ability to handle challenges and risks. However, it seems one of the easiest
methods to analyze a specific job but truth is that it is the most difficult one. Why? Let’s
Discover.
It is due to the fact that every person has his own way of observing things. Different
people think different and interpret the findings in different ways. Therefore, the process
may involve personal biasness or likes and dislikes and may not produce genuine results.
Dept of MBA, SJBIT Page 21
Smartworld.asia 22
This error can be avoided by proper training of job analyst or whoever will be conducting
the job analysis process.
This particular method includes three techniques: direct observation, Work Methods
Analysis and Critical Incident Technique. The first method includes direct observation
and recording of behaviour of an employee in different situations. The second involves
the study of time and motion and is specially used for assembly-line or factory workers.
The third one is about identifying the work behaviours that result in performance.
This method helps interviewer know what exactly an employee thinks about his or her
own job and responsibilities involved in it. It involves analysis of job by employee
himself. In order to generate honest and true feedback or collect genuine data, questions
asked during the interview should be carefully decided. And to avoid errors, it is always
good to interview more than one individual to get a pool of responses. Then it can be
generalized and used for the whole group.
Questionnaire Method: Another commonly used job analysis method is getting the
questionnaires filled from employees, their superiors and managers. However, this
method also suffers from personal biasness. A great care should be takes while framing
questions for different grades of employees.
In order to get the true job-related info, management should effectively communicate it to
the staff that data collected will be used for their own good. It is very important to ensure
them that it won’t be used against them in anyway. If it is not done properly, it will be a
sheer wastage of time, money and human resources.
These are some of the most common methods of job analysis. However, there are several other
specialized methods including task inventory, job element method, competency profiling,
technical conference, threshold traits analysis system and a combination of these methods. While
choosing a method, HR managers need to consider time, cost and human efforts included in
conducting the process.
Job Description
Job description includes basic job-related data that is useful to advertise a specific job and attract
a pool of talent. It includes information such as job title, job location, reporting to and of
employees, job summary, nature and objectives of a job, tasks and duties to be performed,
working conditions, machines, tools and equipments to be used by a prospective worker and
hazards involved in it.
The main purpose of job description is to collect job-related data in order to advertise for
a particular job. It helps in attracting, targeting, recruiting and selecting the right
candidate for the right job.
It is done to determine what needs to be delivered in a particular job. It clarifies what
employees are supposed to do if selected for that particular job opening.
It gives recruiting staff a clear view what kind of candidate is required by a particular
department or division to perform a specific task or job.
It also clarifies who will report to whom.
Job Specification
Described on the basis of job description, job specification helps candidates analyze whether are
eligible to apply for a particular job vacancy or not.
It helps recruiting team of an organization understand what level of qualifications, qualities and
set of characteristics should be present in a candidate to make him or her eligible for the job
opening.
Job Specification gives detailed information about any job including job responsibilities, desired
technical and physical skills, conversational ability and much more.
It helps in selecting the most appropriate candidate for a particular job.
Job description and job specification are two integral parts of job analysis. They define a job
fully and guide both employer and employee on how to go about the whole process of
recruitment and selection. Both data sets are extremely relevant for creating a right fit between
job and talent, evaluate performance and analyze training needs and measuring the worth of a
particular job.
Job evaluation
Defn:
A job evaluation is a systematic way of determining the value/worth of a job in relation to other jobs in an
organization. It tries to make a systematic comparison between jobs to assess their relative worth for the
purpose of establishing a rational pay structure. Job evaluation, on the other hand, specifies the relative
value or worth of each job in an organization.
Purpose of Job Evaluation:
Definition: Jobs must be clearly defined such that they are identifiable and easily
distinguishable. These jobs must then be part of the job description.
Evaluation: A job evaluation scheme must be arrived upon and used as a standard and
all jobs in the organisation must be evaluated as per that scheme only.
Job Understanding: Job evaluators need to have deep insights into the job design
process. They must have a methodical understanding of various tasks involved.
Concern: Job evaluation must be concerned with the job and not with the person. i.e. it is
the job that has to be evaluated and not the person
Assessment: The assessment has to be carried out in an acceptable manner and by
competent people. Further, it is based on judgement and is not scientific but can however
be used to make objective judgements if used correctly.
• Supports work flow: Job evaluation supports work flow in two ways. It integrates each job’s
pay with its relative contributions to the organization, and it helps set pay for new, unique, or
changing jobs.
• Is fair to employees: Job evaluation can reduce disputes and grievances over pay differences
among jobs by establishing a workable, agreed-upon structure that reduces the role of chance,
favoritism, and bias in setting pay.
• Motivates behavior toward organization objectives: Job evaluation calls out to employees
what it is about their work that the organization values, what supports the organization’s strategy
and its success. It can also help employees adapt to organization changes by improving their
understanding of what is valued in their new assignments and why that value may have changed.
Thus, job evaluation helps create the network of rewards (promotions, challenging work) that
motivates employees. If the purpose of the evaluation is not called out, it becomes too easy to get
lost in complex procedures, negotiations, and bureaucracy. The job evaluation process becomes
the end in itself instead of a way to achieve an objective. Establishing its purpose can help ensure
that the evaluation actually is a useful systematic process.
If the purpose of the evaluation is not called out, it becomes too easy to get lost in complex
procedures, negotiations, and bureaucracy. The job evaluation process becomes the end in itself
instead of a way to achieve an objective. Establishing its purpose can help ensure that the
evaluation actually is a useful systematic process.
Involvement of stakeholders:
If the internal structure’s purpose is to aid managers—and if ensuring high involvement and
commitment from employees is important—those managers and employees with a stake in the
results should be involved in the process of designing it. A common approach is to use
committees, task forces, or teams that include representatives from key operating functions,
including nonmanagerial employees. In some cases, the group’s role is only advisory; in others,
the group designs the evaluation approach, chooses compensable factors, and approves all major
changes. Organizations with unions often find that including union representatives helps gain
acceptance of the results. Union-management task forces participated in the design of a new
evaluation system for the federal government. However, other union leaders believe that
philosophical differences prevent their active participation. They take the position that collective
bargaining yields more equitable results. So the extent of union participation varies. No single
perspective exists on the value of active participation in the process, just as no single
management perspective exists.
Points rating - Different levels are accorded to the various elements of jobs and then the
points allocated to different levels are totaled to get point score of the jobs which forms
the basis of pay structure.
Factor comparison - A comparison of various independent factors of jobs is done and
points are given to each factor rank of individual job. These points are then totaled to
rank the jobs.
Job ranking - Job is not broken into factors or elements, rather it is evaluated as a whole
and is compared with other jobs to be ranked accordingly.
Paired comparison - Jobs are compared with each other and allocated points depending
on being ‘greater, lesser or equal’. These points are added to create rank order of jobs.
Module 4: (8 Hours)
Determining External Competitiveness and Benefits Management:
Competitiveness: Definition of Competitiveness, Pay Policy Alternatives, Wage Surveys, Interpreting
Survey Results, Pay Policy Line, Pay Grades
Benefits: Benefits Determination Process, Value of Benefits, Legally Required Benefits, Retirement,
Medical, & Other Benefits
In external competitiveness, (the second pay policy) comparisons are made outside the
organization – comparisons with other employers that hire the same kinds of employees.
External competitiveness is expressed in practice by (1) setting a pay level that is above, below,
or equal to that of competitors, and (2) determining the mix of pay forms relative to those of
competitors.
External competitiveness refers to the pay relationships among organizations – the organization’s
pay relative to its competitors. Pay level refers to the average of the array of rates paid by an
employer: (base + bonuses + benefits + options) number of employees. Pay forms are the various
types of payments, or pay mix, that make up total compensation.
Both pay level and pay mix focus on two objectives: (1) control costs, and (2) attract and retain
employees.
Control Costs
The higher the pay level, the higher the labor costs: Labor costs = pay level x number of
employees The higher the pay level relative to what competitors pay, the greater the relative
costs to provide similar products or services. So you might think that all organizations would pay
the same job the same rate. However, they do not.
Labor Demand
How many people will a specific employer hire? The answer requires an analysis of labor
demand. In the short term, an employer cannot change any other factor of production (i.e.,
technology, capital, or natural resources. Under such conditions, a single employer’s demand for
labor coincides with the marginal product of labor.
The marginal product of labor is the additional output associated with the employment of one
additional human resource unit, with other production factors held constant. The marginal
revenue of labor is the additional revenue generated when the firm employs one additional unit
of human resources, with other production factors held constant.
Marginal Product
Diminishing marginal productivity results from the fact that each additional employee has a
progressively smaller share of the other factors of production with which to work. In the short
term, other factors of production (e.g., office space, number of computers, telephone lines) are
fixed. As more business graduates are brought into the firm without changing other production
factors, the marginal productivity must eventually decline.
Marginal Revenue
Marginal revenue is the money generated by the sale of the marginal product, the additional
output from the employment of one additional person. Therefore, the employer will continue to
hire graduates until the marginal revenue generated by the last hire is equal to the costs
associated with employing that graduate. Because other potential costs will not change in the
short run, the level of demand that maximized profits is that level at which the marginal revenue
of the last hire is equal to the wage rate for that hire. A manager using the marginal revenue
product model must do only two things: (1) determine the pay level set by market forces, and (2)
determine the marginal revenue generated by each new hire. This will tell the manager how
many people to hire.
The model provides a valuable analytical framework, but it oversimplifies the real world. In most
organizations, it is almost impossible to quantify the goods or services produced by an individual
employee, since most production is through joint efforts of employees with a variety of skills.
So neither the marginal product nor the marginal revenue is directly measurable. However, if
compensable factors define what organizations value, then job evaluation reflects the job’s
contribution and may be viewed as a proxy for marginal revenue product.
Labour Supply
This model assumes that many people are seeking jobs, that they possess accurate information
about all job openings, and that no barriers to mobility (discrimination, licensing provisions, or
union membership requirements) among jobs exist. If unemployment rates are low, offers of
higher pay may not increase supply – everyone who wants to work is already working. If
competitors quickly match a higher offer, the employer may face a higher pay level but no
increase in supply.
Lead-Lead: If you want your pay structure to remain ahead of the market for the entire
year (i.e., certain industries, skilled workforce, limited labor pool, etc.), you peg your
midpoints to be competitive throughout. By targeting the end date, December 31st you
will stay ahead of the game even as the market slowly catches up. You will lead the
market for both the first and the second six months of the year.
Lag-Lag: On the opposite scale,if you're satisfied to remain behind the market for the
complete fiscal year (i.e., certain industries, less skilled workforce, abundant labor pool,
affordability issues, etc.), you peg your pay structure to be competitive (matched) only
for one day, the first of the year. From January 2nd onward your structure then slips
behind the market, falling ever further all the way through to December 31st. You will
lag the first six months and even more so for the second six months.
Lead-Lag: A common practice is to split the difference, because you're not too worried
over six months of slippage. So you peg your structure to July 31st. You will then lead
the market for the first six months, then lag the market by an acceptable amount for the
second six months.
Wage Surveys: A wage survey is a systematic process of collecting & making judgements about the
compensation paid by other employers. They provide the data for setting the pay policy relative to
competition & translating that policy into pay levels & structures.
1. Designing the survey:
2. Who should be involved in the survey design?
3. How many employers should be involved? Which jobs should be included?
4. What information to collect?
Nature of the Total Compensation System: Cash forms used, Non-Cash forms used
Incumbent & Job: Date job, individual, pay
Interpreting survey results:
1. The policy on competitive position is translated into practice by pay policy lines.
2. The use of grades & ranges recognizes both internal & external pressures on pay
decisions.
3. Pay ranges permit the employers to value & recognize these differences with pay.
Pay policy Line: A mathematical expression that describes the relationship between a
job’s pay & its evaluation points.
Pay Grades: Grouping jobs of similar worth or content together for pay administration
purposes. Range speed is the distance between min & max amounts in a pay grade.
Benefits:
Employee benefits are that part of the total compensation package, other than pay for
time worked, provided to employees in whole or in part by employer payments (e.g.,
life insurance, pension, workers’ compensation, vacation).
Benefits are the programs an employer uses to supplement employees’ compensation,
such as paid time off, medical insurance, company car, and more. Employee benefits
are optional, non-wage compensation provided to employees in addition to their normal
wages or salaries. These types of benefits may include group insurance (health, dental,
vision, life etc.), disability income protection, retirement benefits, daycare, tuition
reimbursement, sick leave, vacation (paid and non-paid), funding of education, as well
as flexible and alternative work arrangements.
Benefits are forms of value, other than payment, that are provided to the employee in
return for their contribution to the organization, that is, for doing their job. Some benefits,
such as unemployment and worker's compensation, are federally required. (Worker's
compensation is really a worker's right, rather than a benefit.)
A well designed compensation and benefits plan helps to attract, motivate and retain talent in the
firm (which is myWear). A well designed compensation & benefits plan will benefit the
boutique in the following ways.
1. Job satisfaction: the employees would be happy with their jobs and would love to work for
you if they get fair rewards in exchange of their services.
2. Motivation: We all have different kinds of needs. Some of us want money so they work for the
company which gives them higher pay. Some value achievement more than money, they would
associate themselves with firms which offer greater chances of promotion, learning and
development. A compensation plan that hits workers’ needs is more likely to motivate them to
act in the desired way.
3. Low Absenteeism: Why would anyone want to skip the day and watch not-so-favorite TV
program at home, if they enjoy the office environment and are happy with their salaries and get
what they need and want?
4. Low Turnover: Would your employees want to work for any other boutique if you offer them
fair rewards. Rewards which they thought they deserved?
ADVANTAGES TO EMPLOYEES
1. Peace of Mind: the offering of several types of insurances to your workers
relieves them from certain fears. the workers as a result now work with relaxed
mind.
2. Increases self-confidence.
Value of benefits:
A total rewards approach to compensating employees is more than just salaries and bonuses.
The human resources professional community has expanded how it defined the discipline
generally known as compensation and benefits to rename it "total rewards." The definition of
compensation and benefits was rather limited--mainly the perception of it--to mean what you pay
employees, and the types of benefits such as medical coverage, income protection options,
vacation and sick time.
Total rewards is a relatively new term coined by members of the human resources professional
community and adopted by human resources associations, such as the Society for Human
Resources Management and WorldatWork, an association primarily for compensation
professionals.
Formerly referred to as simply compensation and benefits, total rewards takes on a more creative
and broad definition of the ways employees receive compensation, benefits, perks and other
valuable options. WorldatWork defines this new term: "Total rewards include everything the
employee perceives to be of value resulting from the employment relationship."
Small businesses and large corporations alike are affected by the economy, and thus are quick to
devise more creative and less-costly options to reward employees. Small businesses with smaller
budgets are prone to consider leveling actual compensation and providing benefits to minimize
the expense of maintaining a satisfied workforce.
For example, under the old reference to compensation and benefits, employers considered the
cost of an employee's salary, the employer versus employee cost for medical coverage, and the
value of vacation and sick pay for each worker. Renaming these activities gives employers the
motivation to engage in more creative ways to reward employees. Rewards do not always have
to be cost of living increases, salary increases for excellent performance and the cost of having
employees out of the office for sick days or vacations.
The value of total rewards is high, simply because of the wider variety of factors that comprise
total rewards. In addition to salaries and wages, total rewards may be broad structures of
compensation and benefits package. On the other hand, total rewards may include many noncash
incentives and recognition. A total rewards program might include on-site childcare and athletic
gym membership. Some companies allow their employees use of the company's retreat or
vacation dwelling, very beneficial for travelers who don't want to wipe out their vacation money
on lodging. Other substantial perks can include tuition reimbursement, payment for attendance
and completion of professional development activities, or opportunities for employees to design
their own schedules with arrangements such as telecommuting. All of these rewards are valuable,
although there isn't an enormous cash outlay with which you must be concerned. When you
consider total compensation in the form of total rewards, the added value is remarkable.
Employment Insurance provides temporary financial assistance for unemployed Canadians while
they look for work or upgrade their skills. People who are sick, pregnant or caring for a newborn
or adopted child, as well as those who must care for a family member who is seriously ill with a
significant risk of death, may also be assisted by Employment Insurance.
Employment Insurance (EI) premiums are calculated on, and deducted from, an employee's
maximum insurable earnings (MIE), which are insurable salary, wages, cash allowances and
other remuneration paid to an employee. The Canada Revenue Agency is responsible for
determining what is considered insurable employment and which earnings are insurable.
Most employees in Canada are considered to be in “insurable employment” and covered by EI.
As of January 1, 1997, every hour of work is insurable up to a yearly maximum earnings limit,
replacing the previously required weekly minimum earnings or hours worked.
All employees in insurable employment must have EI premiums deducted from their earnings.
Premiums are set annually as a rate per $100 of Insurable Earnings up to the level of Maximum
Insurable Earnings. Their employers are also required to make payments at 1.4 times the
employee rate, unless Human Resources and Skills Development Canada has granted the
employer a reduced rate.
Procedures for premium deductions and remittances are outlined in “Canada Revenue Agency
Instructions to Employers”
There are several types of benefits available to Canadians, depending on their situation.
Regular Benefits
These benefits are available to individuals who lose their jobs through no fault of their own (for
example, due to shortage of work, seasonal layoffs, or mass layoffs) and who are available for
and able to work, but can’t find a job.
These benefits provide support to individuals who are pregnant, have recently given birth, are
adopting a child, or are caring for a newborn.
Sickness Benefits
These benefits are for individuals who are unable to work because of sickness, injury, or
quarantine.
These benefits are available to people who have to be away from work temporarily to provide
care or support to a family member who is gravely ill with a significant risk of death.
Statutory Obligations
A statutory obligation is a requirement that employers are required to provide their employees as
determined by the law of the province or territory where the employer operates.
Employment Standards Legislation sets out the minimum terms and conditions of employment
for those who operate federally and for each province or territory. Both employers and
employees must follow these minimum obligations unless they offer terms or conditions more
generous that the ones mandated by legislation.
Therefore, employment standards legislation sets out minimum standards relating to employment
terms and conditions. The legislation also includes exceptions for certain types of employees,
such as managers and professionals. Some key areas covered by legislation are:
Minimum Wage
Hours of Work
Vacations and Holiday Leave
Maternity and Paternity Leaves
Adoption and Parental Leaves
Emergency/Sick Leave/Compassionate Leave
Bereavement Leave
Leave entitlement
Grievance procedures
Termination of employment
Human Rights Legislation goes beyond just the employment relationship but does address
certain issues relating to potential workplace discrimination
Occupational Health and Safety Legislation creates health and safety obligations for both
employers and employees to minimize the risk of workplace accidents.
Worker’s Compensation Legislation provides workers who become sick or injured at work with
compensation for both economic and non-economic losses, in certain circumstances for
participating organizations.
Retirement
Retirement and pension benefits are provided to retired government officials to ensure a regular
income and a secure future. The provision of such financial benefits results in a feeling of
independence and a decent standard of life. As far as retirement benefits are concerned, they
usually consist of leave encashment, retirement gratuity and contributed provident fund.
Along with these retirement benefits, senior citizens are also entitled to pension benefits that
allow them to live a hassle free life after completion of their job tenure. Different types of
pension available to senior citizens are superannuation, retiring pension, voluntary retirement
pension, compensation pension, compassionate allowance, extraordinary pension and family
pension.
Superannuation pension is meant for those government officials who retire at the age of 60 years.
Voluntary pension is awarded to those who wish to retire three months in advance after
completing 20 years of service. Extraordinary pension is another pension scheme that is awarded
to those government employees who are disabled or the families of those employees who lose
their lives during the tenure of their job.
Employment-based pensions
A retirement plan is an arrangement to provide people with an income during retirement when
they are no longer earning a steady income from employment. Often retirement plans require
both the employer and employee to contribute money to a fund during their employment in order
to receive defined benefits upon retirement. It is a tax deferred savings vehicle that allows for the
tax-free accumulation of a fund for later use as a retirement income. Funding can be provided in
other ways, such as from labor unions, government agencies, or self-funded schemes. Pension
plans are therefore a form of "deferred compensation". A SSAS is a type of employment-based
Pension in the UK.
Some countries also grant pensions to military veterans. Military pensions are overseen by the
government; an example of a standing agency is the United States Department of Veterans
Affairs. Ad hoc committees may also be formed to investigate specific tasks, such as the U.S.
Commission on Veterans' Pensions (commonly known as the "Bradley Commission") in 1955–
56. Pensions may extend past the death of the veteran himself, continuing to be paid to the
widow
Many countries have created funds for their citizens and residents to provide income when they
retire (or in some cases become disabled). Typically this requires payments throughout the
citizen's working life in order to qualify for benefits later on. A basic state pension is a
"contribution based" benefit, and depends on an individual's contribution history. For examples,
see National Insurance in the UK, or Social Security in the United States of America.
Many countries have also put in place a "social pension". These are regular, tax-funded non-
contributory cash transfers paid to older people. Over 80 countries have social pensions.[4] Some
are universal benefits, given to all older people regardless of income, assets or employment
record. Examples of universal pensions include New Zealand Superannuation [5] and the Basic
Retirement Pension of Mauritius.[6] Most social pensions, though, are means-tested, such as
Supplemental Security Income in the United States of America or the "older person's grant" in
South Africa.[7]
Disability pensions
Some pension plans will provide for members in the event they suffer a disability. This may take
the form of early entry into a retirement plan for a disabled member below the normal retirement
age.
Phased Retirement
Today’s work place is challenged with having up to four different generations working side by
side. For most employers, designing a compensation and benefit structure that address the unique
needs of each demographic group, is a complex task. Added to that is the shift in pension
structures over the past few years. Some non-profit organizations provide their employees with a
pension fund; however most tend to offer only contributions to an RRSP. This leads to an
increasing number of employees not feeling able to retire.
It is important that organizations understand the details of their pension plan, whether it is a
defined benefit or contribution or simply an RRSP program before considering design changes.
For those not hindered by a design change, one option that is gaining in popularity, especially in
this sector, is providing a phased retirement program for older skilled employees.
For employees:
Components of the phased program are allowing employees who might be considering retiring to
delay their departure date, continue to earn a partial income that reduces the burden on their
pension income, they continue to receive benefit coverage and are able to acclimate gradually by
continuing to reduce their hours until they are prepared to leave.
For employers:
Employers are able to develop a timely and effective succession plan without losing critical skills
or intellectual capital. Organizations benefit by being able to tap into the most experienced staff
at a reduced salary, while transitioning to a new team or organizational design.
Hurdles:
Employees need to understand the impact continuing to work may have on pension or benefit
programs; also to be considered is the timing of starting your phased approach. If an employee
starts too soon, they might not have accumulated enough to compensate for the reduced salary.
Employers need to be sure that the phased retirement program is structured in a way that will not
diminish the work of the organization or the financial position of the employee.
Medical Benefits
The injured or ill worker who is eligible for workers' compensation will receive necessary
medical care directly related to the original injury or illness and the recovery from his/her
disability. The treating health care provider must be authorized by the Workers' Compensation
Board, except in an emergency situation. Some injured or ill workers may require diagnostic
tests, x-ray examinations, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or other radiological examinations
or tests. As of March 13, 2007, insurance carriers, which includes self-insured employers and the
State Insurance Fund, are authorized to contract with a legally and properly organized diagnostic
networks to perform diagnostic tests, x-ray examinations, magnetic resonance imaging or other
radiological tests or examinations or tests. In addition, insurance carriers may require claimants
to obtain or undergo such diagnostic tests with a provider or at a facility that is affiliated with the
network the carrier has contracted with, except when a medical emergency exists requiring an
immediate diagnostic test or if the network does not have a provider or facility able to perform
the diagnostic test within a reasonable distance from the claimant's residence or place of
employment.
Organizational health expense plans are generally permitted in the following areas across
Canada:
Hospital room charges in excess of the standard rate to cover semi-private or private
accommodation
Hospital charges for emergency treatment outside Canada
Drugs, medication and vaccines and other supplies available only by prescription
Professional services of a physician for out-of-country medical expenses
Professional services for private duty nursing
Charges for special medical appliances such as crutches, artificial limbs or wheelchairs
Non-emergency ambulance services
Dental treatments not requiring hospitalization.
Professional services provided by licensed paramedicals, such as psychologists, massage
therapists, speech therapists, podiatrists, physiotherapists, chiropractors, osteopaths, or
naturopaths.
Vision care expenses including frames and lenses, contact lenses, fitting and remedial
treatment, laser eye correction surgery
o This option is one that many employers struggle to provide their employees with
as the number requiring vision care is so great, the cost of including this option
could raise the employer’s costs by anywhere from 20 to 40%
It is common practice to include many of the above items under a single extended healthcare
plan. Most benefit carriers will tailor a plan to include only those features and coverage’s
desired. Certain items, however, are often restricted or sold in combination with other coverage’s
to contain overall plan costs or to subsidize heavily utilized services.
Extended healthcare plan options should be selected based on the organization’s overall
compensation objectives and employee needs. For small organizations, the range of coverage
options may be limited if the plans are financed on a fully insured basis. These plans offer
restricted flexibility to limit the occurrence of high-risk claims. These pre-packaged plans are
available to small organizations through affiliation with umbrella organizations such as chambers
of commerce, boards of trade, trade associations and professional organizations. For larger
organizations, the range of options is mostly limited by cost considerations.
Other Benefits
Dental
Dental plan design is the art of finding a delicate balance between understanding what the
foundational priorities are, and allocating sufficient funds, to ensure that the coverage is
perceived as being sufficient and appropriate.
Although the type of dental work can differ from person to person, some common elements have
been found:
Most employees, their spouses and children, require basic preventative dental care and
repair. Therefore, most employers elect to design the plan in such a way as to minimize
the cost to employees of basic coverage.
Since major restorative care and orthodontics tend to be more elective in nature and less
common in need across the employee group than basic services, most plans do not
provide equal coverage in all areas. For example, the plan might pay 100% of basic and
50% of the other two categories. It is also common to find deductibles, co-insurance and
benefit maximums for the non-basic services to free up more funds for the necessary
preventive ones.
High employee deductibles and co-insurance percentages can help to limit plan
disbursements because employees will be paying more of the total costs. The potential
problem is that these high employee costs may, in effect, force postponement of needed
dental work until the repair bill is even higher. Paying 100% of basic preventative care
from day one is the overwhelming choice of employers.
Having the dental plan require a “pre-treatment” evaluation for certain expenses helps
control cost levels by ensuring that the plan only pays for reasonable treatments. It also
avoids any misunderstanding by the employee as to what services are covered and how
much he or she is required to pay. It is always preferable to ensure the employee knows
what the plan will pay for and what exact dollar amount is their responsibility.
A commonly asked question of benefit administrators is why the dental plan is not
optional but compulsory? If the plan is optional, only those employees who are likely to
need dental care will sign up. They will almost always use services that exceed their
contributions, deductibles and co-insurance. Those who feel that the benefits will not
cover their costs will decline. Because of this “adverse selection”, cost per employee will
be so high that employers would not be perceived as competitive.
Most employers design their plans with a provision to protect the employee and/or their family in
the event of Accidental Death or Dismemberment (AD&D). Employers often provide basic
coverage as a factor of the employee’s salary, (example: 2x the employee’s salary in the event of
death or total paralysis) with additional coverage available should the employee chose to
purchase it. Each employee benefit plan should include a chart that identifies what coverage is
available and the associated cost.
Long-term disability
providing confidential qualified counseling and support can reduce the stress and conflict felt by
the employee, which in-turn can reduce absenteeism and ultimately turnover.
One-on-one sessions are offered and online information, coaching and support services are also
available. Employees turn to the EAP for help with a variety of issues, including the following:
Dependent care issues, such as searching for child care information, identifying services
for special needs children, obtaining advice on the college application process, or
arranging for residential care for an elder.
Dealing with the stress of a major life change (even a positive one), such as having or
adopting a child, getting married, moving or buying a home, or getting a promotion.
Serious personal or professional concerns, such as general anxiety, depression, substance
abuse, burnout, coping with illness, the loss of a loved one, relationship challenges, or
resolving interpersonal conflicts.
Death benefits replace a portion of lost family income for eligible family members of employees
killed on the job.
Maximum Medical Improvement (MMI)
the point in time when your work-related injury or illness has improved as much
as it is going to improve, or
104 weeks from the date you became eligible to receive temporary income
benefits.
Education benefits
Alcon provides and/or assists with relevant on-site and external courses, conferences and
seminars, tuition reimbursement, professional memberships, etc.
Family benefits
Employee Assistance Program – provides assistance and support with issues such as
mental health and legal problems
Adoption Reimbursement Program
Group Legal Plan
Cafeteria
Service awards
Company store
Auto purchase discounts
Other corporate discounts
Employee Contributions: Pay For Performance (PFP): Rewarding Desired Behaviors, Does
Compensation Motivate Performance?, Designing PFP Plans, Merit Pay/Variable Pay, Individual vs. Group
Incentives, Long Term Incentives. Compensation of Special Groups: Who are Special Groups?, Compensation
Strategies For Special Groups
Performance-related pay is a salary paid relating to how well one works. Car salesmen or
production line workers, for example, may be paid in this way, or through commission.
Many employers use this standards-based system for evaluating employees and for setting
salaries. Standards-based methods have been in de facto use for centuries among commission-
based sales staff: they receive more pay for selling more, and low performers do not earn enough
to make keeping the job worthwhile even if they manage to keep the job.
DEFINITION :
'Employee Contribution Plan: A company-sponsored retirement plan where employees may
elect to have a portion of each paycheck deposited into a retirement account owned by the
employee and held in his or her name.
Pay-for-Performance ("PFP")
Pay-for-Performance ("PFP") systems tie compensation directly to specific business goals and
management objectives. To do this, companies must deliver competitive pay for competitive
levels of performance, pay above market for exceptional performance, and reduced pay for poor
performance. To achieve this, companies must match measurable and controllable performance
targets to company objectives.
In PFP systems, employees’ compensation is composed of a fixed base salary and a variable
component. The most commonly used variable components are:
Company equity (Phantom or actual) - the quantity and price to be paid are typically
based on a percentage of value added as determined by the performance measurement
system;
Bonuses - cash awards for extraordinary accomplishments or other activity-related
distributions;
Gain sharing - distribution of a portion of results realized, based on performance versus
plan.
These systems are designed to retain top-performing employees, motivate the desired
performance, and control costs. If a company wants to pay for performance, it must define
performance in very specific, objective, quantifiable terms, measure it and track it.
Over the years, many companies have attempted to implement performance based pay for
employees. Some have been successful with the programs, while others have experienced utter
failure. So what makes a performance based pay program work in some situations and not
others?
Research and real-world trial and error suggest that the success of a performance based pay
system can vary greatly depending on many factors, including:
These are not the only factors that can impact the success of a performance based pay system, of
course, but they are all extremely important influences on how the performance based pay
system will operate. Consider the following discussion of the points above to determine whether
a performance based pay system would be appropriate for your company:
Employee Commitment
Believe it or not, research indicates that the most successful performance based pay systems are
those that are implemented at low-commitment companies. In businesses where employees are
highly committed to the company, performance based pay initiatives are often not as well-
received by employees as they are at low commitment companies.
In low commitment companies, employees view the opportunity to receive additional pay based
on increased performance as a great way to make extra money, and their productivity increases
as a result.
In high commitment companies, however, performance based pay systems are rarely worth the
effort. Often, because they are loyal to their companies, employees are willing to work harder to
meet deadlines anyway, making performance based pay incentives an unnecessary expense.
Research shows that in some instances, highly committed employees may even become offended
by the company’s introduction of performance based pay, viewing the program as a form of
bribery.
The length of your performance based pay program will be a huge determining factor of its
success. Research indicates that some of the most successful performance based pay systems
tend to be those that are implemented only temporarily.
The reason behind this is that when faced with an ongoing performance based pay system, many
employees adjust to it very quickly. After a time, employees become accustomed to receiving
increased pay, and in the event that that pay is lowered (when performance objectives are not
met), employees feel as if they have been cheated. This causes morale to drop, which can cause
performance to decrease even more. As business researchers Michael Beer and Mark Cannon
remarked in their performance based pay research, “A workforce that always expects additional
pay for additional progress can become a liability.”
When performance based pay systems are implemented only as temporary solutions, though (for
rushed projects, important client deadlines, etc.), employees tend to view the increased pay as a
bonus, rather than as a guarantee.
One of the main reasons performance based pay systems fail is a lack of communication between
management and employees. In order for a performance pay program to be successful at your
company, you must ensure that employees and managers have similar expectations for the
program. Some common points that must be discussed with employees include:
If management does not discuss the ins and outs of the program with employees, then they are
bound to encounter problems. For a performance based pay program to be effective, it must also
be fair, and in order for it to be considered fair, it must be completely understood by each and
every employee who takes part in it.
The most important component of your company’s performance based pay program is the
balance of costs and benefits. Studies have shown that a huge number of companies overestimate
the benefits of performance pay systems and severely underestimate the costs. In order for your
performance pay program to be successful, you must be realistic about the costs and benefits.
Consider the following questions when evaluating costs:
What estimated percentage of employees will receive increased pay under the program?
How much of a pay increase will employees have to receive in order to sustain increased
performance? Can the company afford that increase?
Realistically, how much will the company benefit from the increased employee
performance?
How long can the company sustain the program?
How much time will management have to spend implementing, tweaking, and/or
redesigning the program? How much will those adjustments cost the company?
Could the predicted benefits of the performance based pay system also be achieved
through more conventional and less costly managerial methods like coaching, training,
etc.?
Performance based pay systems are not as straightforward as many companies think, so before
implementing one at your business, it’s important that you try to learn from the mistakes of those
who came before you. While performance pay programs can be extremely effective, they are
unlikely to be successful if you do not perform thorough research before implementing them.
If a performance based pay program is to succeed at your company, you must ensure that
managers and employees communicate their expectations clearly, that you carefully research the
best length of time for your program, and that you find the perfect balance between employee
reward and company profit.
Determining the foundations of a pay system can be a very difficult dilemma. In most cases, the
basis of the pay system will boil down to two main options: Seniority-based pay systems and
performance-based pay systems. While the decision may seem to have implications solely in the
area of compensation management, an inappropriate pay system choice can lead to higher
turnover rates, especially for high performers.
Seniority-based pay systems are those in which the primary basis for pay increases is the
employee’s tenure. It should be noted that seniority-based pay systems can take into account
performance, but the main factor is tenure. Some benefits of seniority-based pay include loyalty,
retention, and stability of all staff members, regardless of performance levels.
Performance-based pay systems consider performance as the primary basis for pay increases. As
with seniority-based pay systems, other factors, like tenure, can be accounted for in a
performance-based system, but employee performance, however conceptualized by the
organization, is the impetus in determining pay raises.
Performance-based pay systems can actually lead to a climate in which all employees are
working hard to achieve maximum performance. While this certainly sounds like an ideal option,
there are several downfalls, such as the potential for high turnover rates as average and lower
performing employees can get discouraged when they regularly fail to receive merit increases.
A common analogy used to help conceptualize this is the tournament analogy. The ‘winners’ are
the high performers who often receive increases, and the ‘losers’ are the average and low
performers who are being passed over for increases. As you would expect, those who
consistently lose the tournament are likely to stop playing the game, i.e. quitting.
The amount of communication about how pay increase decisions are made is crucial to the
functioning of all pay systems. Workers should be told not only how the system is designed, but
also how their pay increases compare to the averages within their jobs. This can be best
accomplished by talking about pay increases as percentages, thus avoiding negative feelings
related to salary differences. A final, very important note about pay system communication is
that low levels of pay communication have shown links to increased union-organizing activities.
Pay Dispersion
The extent to which pay differs across employees in the same job is very important to the
effectiveness and implications of pay systems based on both seniority and performance. When
pay dispersion is high, there are important implications, especially to the quit rates of high
performing employees.
In a seniority-based pay system, quit rates of high performing employees are higher when there
is a great deal of pay dispersion. The assumed cause of this relationship is that high performing
employees begin to perceive that their greater amounts of effort and performance are not
appropriately appreciated by the organization. As a result, high performing employees are likely
to leave the organization.
Conversely, when pay dispersion is high in a performance-based pay system, high performing
employees tend to be the highest earners, as their high performance is being highly rewarded. In
this type of structure, high performers tend to stay with the company, as they feel they are well
compensated for their hard work. The downside is, once again, that average and low performing
employees are more likely to leave.
There are a variety of ways to reward people for the quality of the work they do in the
workplace. For example, rewards can be in the form of money, benefits, time off from work,
acknowledgement for work well done, affiliation with other workers or a sense of
accomplishment from finishing a major task.
Rewards should support behaviors directly aligned with accomplishing strategic goals.
This principle may seem so obvious as to sound trite. However, the goal of carefully tying
employees’ behaviors to strategic goals has only become important over the past decade or so.
Recently, the term “performance” is being used to designate behaviors that really contribute to
the “bottom line.” An employee can be working as hard as anyone else, but if his/her behaviors
are not tied directly to achieving strategic goals, then the employee might be engaged only in
busy-work.
Rewards should be tied to passion and purpose, not to pressure and fear.
Fear is a powerful motivator, but only for a short time and then it dissipates. For example, if you
have initially motivated employees by warning them of a major shortage of funds unless they do
a better job, then they will likely be very motivated to work even harder. That approach might
work once or twice, but workers soon will realize that the cause of the organization’s problems is
not because they are not working hard enough. They might soon even resent management’s
resorting to the use of fear. If, instead, management motivates by reminding workers of their
passion for the mission, the motivation will be much more sustainable.
Imagine if someone told you “Thank you” and did not say what for. One of the purposes of a
reward is to reinforce the positive behaviors that earned the reward in the first place. If
employees understand what behaviors they are being rewarded for, they are more likely to repeat
those behaviors.
Rewards should occur shortly after the behaviors they are intended to reinforce.
The closer the occurrence of the reward to the occurrence of the desired behavior in the
workplace, the easier it is for the employee to realize why he/she is being rewarded. The easier it
is for him/her to understand what behaviors are being appreciated.
Finding and training new employees is a substantial cost, no matter the size of the organization.
One of the best ways to retain employees is to reward them for their work. One of the primary
rewards for working adults is to feel a sense of meaning or purpose in their work. If employees
feel that they are serving a useful purpose, they are much more likely to stay at their current job.
A common complaint from employees in small- to medium-sized organizations is that they feel
burned out. A common symptom of burnout is to feel unappreciated. One of the best ways to
address burnout, and retain employees, is to ensure that they feel appreciated for their work.
Thus, it is critical that organizations give careful consideration as to how they reward their
employees. Organizations do not need huge sums of money in order to reward them (besides, the
belief that money is the major reward is just a myth). Guidelines in this section will help you to
think about what might be the best rewards for your employees and to take steps to ensure that
you are providing those rewards.
There is not a set of standard rewards to be used for employees everywhere. Instead, each person
has his/her own nature and needs. The following guidelines will help you to determine what
might be the best ways to reward your employees.
1. Reward employees by letting them hear positive comments from customers about how
the employees’ activities benefited the customer.
2. Occasionally have a Board member come to an employee meeting to thank them. This
usually means a lot to employees, almost as much as having customers provide positive
feedback about the employees’ activities.
3. Understand what motivates each of your employees. You can do this by applying the
“Checklist of Categories of Typical Motivators” in the previous subsection about
supporting employee motivation on page 199. A major benefit of this approach is that
each employee is afforded the opportunity to explain what motivates him or her.
4. In each monthly staff meeting, take a few minutes to open the meeting by mentioning
major accomplishments of various employees.
5. Present gift certificates to employees who have made major accomplishments. Guidelines
for determining who gets this reward should be clearly explained in your personnel
policies in order to ensure all employees perceive the practice as fair and equitable.
Allow employees to recommend other employees for awards.
6. Probably the most fulfilling for employees is to be able to do useful work. Be sure that
each employee understands the mission of the business and how his/her work is
contributing to that mission. Post your mission statement on the walls. Discuss the action-
planning section of your strategic plan with employees so that they see how their
activities tie directly to achieving the strategic goals of the organization.
Compensation plan to retain and motivate employees and up your sales in a down market.
1. Pay employees salary and incentives. The companies with the highest employee morale and
productivity pay a mix of salary and incentives. The salary compensates employees for
performing all the tasks required of them and provides them with a consistent income. The
incentive (which can be commission for salespeople and a bonus for others) motivates them to
meet and exceed their goals and gives them the opportunity to increase their earnings.
Pay employees the salary portion of their compensation monthly or bi-monthly. Pay employees
the incentive portion of their compensation as soon after they meet their goals as feasible. Thus,
quarterly incentive payments are usually more motivating than annual payments and monthly
incentive payments are often best.
2. Keep the incentive part of your plan simple. The test of a good compensation plan is that
the incentive part measures no more than two to four performance factors, and all employees can
accurately explain the plan in the time it takes to walk from the front door of your office building
to your receptionist's desk.
3. Establish SMART goals. SMART goals are: Specific, Measurable, Ambitious, Realistic and
Time-bound.
For salespeople, that means establishing monthly and annual revenue goals and/or goals for
opening new accounts. For other customer contact people, establish goals for the ratio of
customer compliments versus complaints, and/or the number of customer complaints they
resolve on the first phone call. For employees in accounts receivable, consider basing goals on
how much outstanding revenue they collect against specific targets. For those in manufacturing,
consider basing goals on the number of products they manufacture free of defects.
While it's okay to pay a small part of the incentives based on the team's overall results, most of
the incentive should be based on individual results.
4. Determine what your competitors are paying. One way to attract and retain top employees-
and keep them motivated is to pay them as much or more than your competitors. Every few
years, you should determine what your competitors are paying and adjust your compensation
plan accordingly. You can do this informally by asking employees with other companies that you
interview about their compensation plan, or more objectively by hiring an outside consulting
firm to benchmark your plan against others and advise you on how to adjust it.
5. Modify salaries based on employees' geographic location. While the incentive plan for
employees working in different cities should not change, you should adjust the salary portion to
reflect the local cost of living, so as not to penalize employees who live in more expensive cities.
6. Use merit increases to reward top performers. In a misguided attempt to keep all
employees happy, many companies misallocate the funds they budget for annual merit increases
by giving all employees essentially the same merit increases. Your first priority should be to
retain and motivate star employees, your second priority to retain and motivate satisfactory
employees. Therefore, award the largest salary increases to your stars, much more modest
increases to satisfactory performers, and no increases to employees whose performance falls
below expectations.
7. Provide employees with non-financial rewards. Besides cash, employees are motivated by
other forms of recognition and rewards. For example, consider establishing an annual trip to
reward employees who have achieved certain annual goals. Besides increasing motivation,
company-sponsored trips build camaraderie and teamwork. How you train, develop and manage
your employees also drives retention and performance. However, paying them as well as you
realistically can — based on their performance — is one of the best ways to heighten their
motivation.
Defining Performance
It is critical to link compensation to your overall business strategy. To do that effectively, you
must be able to identify the direction the organization needs to move and communicate the
desired actions to get there. Compensation provides a very effective tool for getting employees to
move in the same direction and follow the same path.
For example, suppose a young, growing company wants to increase market share. Its
compensation plan needs to reward people for bringing in new customers and clients. In contrast,
a more mature company might need a better balance between growth and profit. Accordingly, its
compensation plan should equally reward activities that generate growth and profit. Another
company might identify world-class customer service as one of its top strategic objectives. It
would need to reward the activities (in all areas of the organization, not just the customer service
department) that lead to outstanding customer service.
Successful compensation plans pay for results. At the same time, they also need to recognize
effort because no matter how hard employees work, sometimes they don't achieve desired
results. People can work hard and not reach their goals, and you can't ignore that, especially
when factors beyond their control impact their performance. Pay for results, but build into the
plan other ways to reward and recognize hard work.
On the results side, you also have to distinguish between performance levels. Most compensation
plans pay very little difference between average performance and outstanding performance.
Effective plans have a very clear correlation between superior results and superior rewards.
Design Issues
How do you measure the goal? The way you measure results will have a huge impact on plan
design. Do you intend to measure profit? Quality improvement? Customer service? Sales
growth? A combination of different measures? Whatever the criteria, be very specific about what
you intend to measure and how you will measure it. For example, if you measure profit, are you
talking about before or after tax? Also, make sure you have a valid and reliable measurement
system and process. Employees will not trust an incentive plan based on questionable measures.
Who participates in the plan? As companies move toward nontraditional work forces, this
question has increasing importance. Most incentive plans include all full-time employees but
exclude temporary, seasonal and contract help. Some companies require employees to be
currently on staff or to have been on staff a certain period of time in order to qualify for the
incentive pay.
How will the payout be determined? Flat dollar amount? Percentage of salary? Percent of profits
above a certain threshold point? Whatever you decide, make sure employees understand the
method of payment.
How often does the plan pay out? Incentive plans typically pay out monthly, quarterly or yearly.
Keep in mind, however, that the shorter the interval between performance and reward, the more
you will impact behavior.
An ongoing research study at the Wharton School of Business demonstrates that short-term,
results-based work relationships often create a higher level of commitment than long-term
relationships. The researchers believe this is because the short-term contracts give participants a
very clear idea of what’s expected of them, what they’ll gain from delivering, the time limits of
the job and the workload necessary to complete it successfully within that time period.
What are the threshold numbers? Some plans pay out after the first dollar of profit; others only
after meeting certain minimum levels of return. If you’re attempting to incentivize hard-to-
measure standards such as customer service or teamwork, you may need to experiment with
thresholds. If so, explain to employees up front that the plan may require some experimentation.
Otherwise, they may think you're manipulating the plan in order to avoid paying out the
incentive.
Who has responsibility for administering the plan? To maintain credibility with employees, treat
your incentive plan with kid-glove care. Assign an administrator who has the respect of
employees and who will maintain a constant flow of information.
Who measures performance? Do not let the people responsible for measuring performance
design the plan. No matter how honest your employees, the temptation to manipulate the data for
personal gain may be too difficult to overcome, particularly with senior managers who stand to
gain significant amounts of money by hitting the goals.
Will you pilot the plan? Many companies prefer to test the plan on one department or division
before rolling it out to the whole company. This also allows time to make revisions and
improvements.
Does the plan pay all monies due or does it have a holdback provision? Some plans have
interval benchmarks but don't pay out until the annual goal has been achieved. Others pay in
increments and then have a larger lump sum at the end. How you pay will depend on what you
measure and what you hope to accomplish with the plan.
What is the life of the plan? All plans should have a "sunset," a designated ending point. This
gives you the ability to adjust or periodically change the plan. Make sure to announce the sunset
at the beginning of the plan, not at the end.
As a final check before installing a new compensation plan, ask the following questions:
Consider a bridge program. Never decrease base pay in order to put in an incentive plan. Nothing
will erode the trust level quicker. (The only exception is a turnaround situation where the
company must cut pay in order to survive.) Instead, consider using a bridge program that
maintains trust levels while allowing employees to get used to the concept of pay for
performance.
A bridging program that combines elements of fixed wage and pay for performance allows
employees to get more comfortable with profitability compensation. Plus, it allows you to make
course corrections along the way. Test your new program for 90 days and then make adjustments
as necessary. Always reserve the right to change the plan so that it benefits the customer, the
company and employees.
Merit Pay:
Definition:
Merit pay is an approach to compensation that rewards the higher performing employees with
additional pay or incentive pay. Merit pay has advantages and disadvantages for the employees
and the employer. But, all-in-all, merit pay is the best way to reward the employees that you
most want to keep.
Merit pay plans reward employees with raises rather than bonuses or other forms of financial
compensation. Instead of tying raises solely to time on the job or promotion to a higher position,
the company gives raises for superior performance. For example, a pizzeria can give merit pay
raises for managers who successfully control ingredient costs. A medical billing company can
offer merit pay raises for employees who collect a higher percentage of outstanding bills. When
an employee receives a merit pay incentive, her salary is permanently increased.
These are reasons why you might want to consider merit pay.
Compensation
Employee Benefits
Employee Awards
Human Resources Software
Sales Rewards Programs
Merit pay helps an employer differentiate between the performance of high and low
performing employees and reward the performance of the higher performers.
Merit pay, unlike profit sharing or similar bonus pay schemes, allows an employer to
differentiate between the performance of the company as a whole and the performance of
an individual. While many merit pay programs also provide an overall reward that is
distributed to all employees, to promote such values as team work, a portion of the
available compensation is reserved for strong performers.
Merit pay also provides a vehicle for an employer to recognize individual performance on
a one time basis. This is useful for rewarding employees who may have participated in a
one-time project such as implementing a new HRIS or opening up a new sales territory.
The amount of time and energy that organizations invest in an attempt to make
performance measurable for merit pay, including developing competencies,
measurements, base lines for performance, and so forth, is better spent on delivering
service for customers.
Given the limitations of metrics, the ability of the supervisor to communicate to each
employee the value of his or her contribution, and what superior performance worthy of
merit pay entails, is an ongoing challenge. Some supervisors communicate better than
others and communication about what entails superior performance is easier in some jobs
than others.
Even with the limitations that exist in the awarding of merit pay, merit pay is your best
opportunity to ensure that your outstanding performers remain with your company and continue
to make their astonishing contributions. Nothing demotivates a high performer faster than
knowing that employees who have contributed much less in the organization, have received the
same pay increase or bonus
Variable pay: The amount of time and energy that organizations invest in an attempt to make
performance measurable for merit pay, including developing competencies, measurements, base
lines for performance, and so forth, is better spent on delivering service for customers.
Given the limitations of metrics, the ability of the supervisor to communicate to each
employee the value of his or her contribution, and what superior performance worthy of
merit pay entails, is an ongoing challenge. Some supervisors communicate better than
others and communication about what entails superior performance is easier in some jobs
than others.
Even with the limitations that exist in the awarding of merit pay, merit pay is your best
opportunity to ensure that your outstanding performers remain with your company and continue
to make their astonishing contributions. Nothing demotivates a high performer faster than
knowing that employees who have contributed much less in the organization, have received the
same pay increase or bonus
Variable pay is employee compensation that changes as compared to salary which is paid in
equal proportions throughout the year. Variable pay is used generally to recognize and reward
employee contribution toward company productivity, profitability, team work, safety, quality, or
some other metric deemed important.
The employee who is awarded variable compensation has gone above and beyond his or her job
description to contribute to organization success.
Compensation
Employee Awards
Employee Benefits
Sales Rewards Programs
HR Management
Variable pay is awarded in a variety of formats including profit sharing, bonuses, holiday bonus,
deferred compensation, cash, and goods and services such as a company-paid trip or a
Thanksgiving turkey.
Most criticisms of variable pay can be traced to concerns about the nature, implementation, and
execution of such programs rather than the theories upon which they are based. "Most [variable
pay] programs provide no incentive to anyone and never deliver the promised results," he
charged. "Why not? Because in 9 cases out of 10, they are not true bonus programs at all. They
are simply profit-sharing programs, and there is a world of difference between the two." By
profit-sharing, I mean the practice of taking a percentage of a company's profits, putting it into a
pool, and disbursing it to the company's employees, usually sometime after the close of the
year." Stack and other analysts contend that such distribution plans are unlikely to encourage
employees toward greater productivity because they do not get an adequate sense of how their
personal contributions helped generate the business's profits. "Many of the failures to date [in
variable pay plans] have occurred because companies simply reshuffled the same amount of
compensation in a new plan, offering some through fixed pay and some through incentives,"
commented Williamson. "But they didn't use the plan to create reach change in the way they
organize and value work."
But business consultants agree that variable pay programs that truly reward individual
performance can be helpful. The purpose of a good bonus program, Stack said, should be "to
make the company stronger, more competitive, able to survive and prosper in the months and
years ahead…. A good bonus program draws people into that process. It drives the value of the
company by educating people, not with formal training programs but through the work they do
every day on the job. It gives them the tools they need to make and understand decisions. It
provides them with business knowledge they can use to enhance their own standard of living and
job security as they're making a measurable difference to the company as a whole."
Individual incentive plans are based on meeting work-related performance standards, such as
quality, productivity, customer satisfaction, safety, or attendance. They are most appropriate
when:
Individual incentive plans require monitoring, and it is important to remember that the incentive
scheme is not a substitute for good management.
Spot bonuses can also be used for individuals to show appreciation or give recognition for a job
well done. This can be a reward for developing new skills, contributing new ideas, obtaining
licenses, or finishing projects early. Typically, a spot bonus is given as a one-time discretionary
payment. These are most prevalent among non-executives.
Team or group incentive plans are a reward for collective performance. These are most effective
when all group members have some impact on goals. The rewards can be equal or different for
each member, but this requires an understanding of team dynamics. Be sure to avoid contrasting
motivational forces.
Group Incentive Schemes:
The incentive schemes can be applied on a group basis also. Group incentive schemes are
appropriate where jobs are interdependent. It is difficult to meaningfully measure individual
performance and group pressures affect the performance of the members of the group. The chief
group incentive schemes are discussed here.
Profit-sharing:
The concept of profit-sharing emerged towards the end of the nineteenth century. Profit-sharing,
as the name itself suggests, is sharing of profit of organisation among employees. The
International Co-operative Congress” held in Paris in 1889 considered the issue of profit-sharing
and defined it as “an agreement (formal or informal) freely entered into by which an employee
receives a share fixed in advance of the profits”.
The basic rationale behind profit-sharing is that the organisational profit is an outcome of the co-
operative efforts of various parties, therefore, employees should also share in profits as
shareholders share by getting dividend on their investment, i.e. share capital. The very purpose of
introducing profit-sharing is to strengthen the loyalty of employees to the organisation. Thus,
profit-sharing is regarded as a stepping stone to industrial democracy.
Both the share (percentage) of profit to be shared by employees and mechanism for its distribu-
tion are determined in advance and also made known to the employees. In order to be eligible to
participate in profit-sharing. An employee needs to serve for a certain number of years and, thus,
earn some seniority. As regards the forms of profit-sharing, Metzger has classified these into
three categories, namely,
(i) Current,
(iii) Combination.
(i) Current:
Under this form, profits are paid to the employees in cash or by cheque or in the form of Stock
option immediately after the determination of profits.
(ii) Deferred:
Profits are credited to employees’ accounts to be paid at the time of retirement or at a time of his
dissociation from organisation due to reasons like disability, death, severance, withdrawal from
employment, etc.
(iii) Combination:
In this case, a part of employee share of profit is paid in cash or cheque or stock and the
remaining part is deferred and credited to his/her account.
Employees receive their share in the organisational profit in the form of bonus. In India, the
employee bonus is governed by the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965.
The major apprehensions expressed against profit-sharing is mat management may dress up
profit figures, as is often done for tax evasion purposes, and deprive employees of their shares in
profit. It is also commented that profit-sharing, being a long-term scheme, does not work as
incentive due to the absence of immediate feedback about the efforts and rewards.
Co-partnership:
The finer points of this scheme are that it recognizes the dignity of labour and also of a partner in
the business. This would, in turn, develop a sense of belongingness among the employees and
encourage them to contribute their best for the development of the organisation.
Scanlon Plan:
The Scanlon plan was developed by Joseph N. Scanlon, a Lecturer at the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology in USA in 1937. The plan is essentially a suggestion scheme designed to involve
the workers in making suggestions for reducing the cost of operation and improving working
methods and sharing in the gains of increased productivity.
The plan is characterised by two basic features. First, both employees and managers can partici-
pate in the plan by submitting their suggestions for cost-cutting methods. Second, increase in
efficiency on account of cost-cutting is shared by the employees of the unit.
The Scanlon plan, wherever adopted, has been successful to encourage a sense of partnership
among employees, improved employee-employer management relations, and increased
motivation to work.
The criticism labelled against group incentive is that the incentive benefits being similar to all
members of the group, the best performers may loose incentive. However, this can be overcome
if group incentive scheme generates peer-level pressure for superior performance and also
reduces the need for supervision. Stability in group may be a necessary condition to make the
group incentive scheme successful.
Executive benefits
Perquisites
Popular Perks Offered to Executives:
Company car
Financial counseling
Company plane
Income tax preparation
First-class air travel
Country club membership
Luncheon club membership
Estate planning
Personal liability insurance
Spouse travel
Chauffeur service
Reserved parking
Executive dining room
Home security system
Car phone
Financial seminars
Loans at low / no interest
Legal counseling
Executive Pay & Performance
Pay is linked to company performance
Company performance exceeds industry standards, big bonuses and stock payouts follow
Poor financial performance means much smaller pay packages
Ways to rein in executive compensation
Stockholders can vote/ propose limits to compensation
Use of tally sheet
Increase government regulation
A common mistake for incentive-based compensation is promising incentives that are not tied to
specific metrics. By having only discretionary bonuses or incentives, executives are unaware
what precisely they need to focus on to be successful.
For each executive, the metrics that are well within their control and follow the SMART criteria
(specific, measurable, attainable, relevant and time-bound) should be used as the basis for their
incentives. This way, they are aware of what they must focus on and they can optimize their
work to achieve those specific goals. Sometimes metrics like revenue and profit are applicable,
but, more often, there are better key performance indicators (KPIs) that should be used.
Another common mistake companies make is when there is a belief that compensation plans are
well understood by the executives, but really there is a huge communication gap. Make sure
every executive is fully aware of all of the components related to their compensation package.
If an executive does not have a clear picture of their total ability to accumulate wealth in their
current position, the likelihood of looking for opportunities with more clarity of the upside is
increased. Uncertainty is almost always bad for business, and this is a case where uncertainty on
the part of a core team member can have unforeseen deleterious effects on a business.
Progress on a compensation plan should be addressed at least annually, outlining both short-term
and long-term incentives. An even better idea is for quarterly communication where the core
metrics to which incentives are tied are discussed. This prevents any miscommunication prior to
when the awards are issued.
If you’re trying to attract top talent, your compensation needs to be competitive. Use
benchmarking tools and publications to ensure you’re compensating your executives in the way
you intend.
In our research, companies often believe they are paying near the top-end of the spectrum for
each of their executives when, in reality, they are at or below the median compensation level for
similar companies.
Make sure the benchmarks you use are meaningful and relevant to your company. Using
multiple reference points to compare your company (for example, by revenue, industry, region,
and revenue growth) will give you a much clearer idea of how competitive your compensation
levels are.
If you plan on issuing equity-linked incentives, your company’s equity value should be appraised
or estimated at least annually. At regular intervals (quarterly, annually, etc.), each executive
should be told the estimated current value of their equity-linked incentives, as well as the
expected future value.
A blend of incentive compensation that provides executives with cash incentives in the short-
term and longer-term incentives that tie an executive to the overall success of the company helps
to ensure your executive team is engaged and feeling rewarded for their hard work regularly.
Implementing an effective executive compensation does not have to be onerous, but it requires
time, planning and dedication for it to work properly. We created our CEO & Senior Executive
Compensation Report for Private Companies to provide companies with both benchmarks and
best practices for their executive team.
Module 6: (8 Hours)
Legal & Administrative Issues in Compensation: Legal Issues, Pay Discrimination,
Comparable Worth, Budgets and Administration
Legal Issues:
Government is a key stakeholder in compensation
Decision making. Governments’ usual interests are whether –
Procedures for determining pay are fair (pay discrimination)
Safety nets for the unemployed and disadvantaged are sufficient (minimum wage,
unemployment insurance)
Employees are protected from exploitation (overtime pay, child labor)
Valuation discrimination–looks at pay women, protected groups, and men receive for
the jobs they perform. It is discriminatory to pay minorities/women less than males when
performing equal work -working side-by-side, in same plant, doing same work,
producing same results
Wage and price control legislation
Pay Discrimination:
Compensation practices where pay may be discriminated are:
extra pay plans
leave policies
Dept of MBA, SJBIT Page 64
Smartworld.asia 65
maternity leave
pension policies
All employers should be keenly aware of their obligation to make certain that their employees
are paid fair and equal wages to avoid lawsuits brought under the Equal Pay Act (EPA) and other
laws. This How To looks to assist employers who wish to avoid costly wage discrimination
lawsuits and ensure equal pay for equal work.
The Equal Pay Act (EPA) requires that men and women receive equal pay for equal work.
Generally, jobs do not have to be identical for equal pay to be required, but substantially equal in
terms of skill, effort and job responsibility, and performed under similar working conditions. The
term pay refers not just to salary but also overtime, bonuses, vacation and holiday pay, stock
options, life insurance, and all other benefits and compensation of any kind paid to employees.
Pay disparities may be allowed under a seniority system, a merit system or a system measuring
earnings by quality or quantity of production, or, if wages were set based on a factor other than
sex. In addition to the EPA, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in
Employment Act (ADEA), and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibit wage
discrimination based on race, religion, sex, national origin, age and disability. However, unlike
the EPA, the other statutes apply even if jobs in question are not substantially equal.
In order to ensure equal pay in the workplace, employers should implement and enforce a policy
prohibiting compensation discrimination or wage discrimination based on an employee's
membership in a protected class. This can often be part of a Discrimination Policy or EEO Policy
that prohibits discrimination in compensation and a practice of ensuring equal pay. Employers
need to make sure that all employees are paid fair and equal wages based on their position and
skill.
Employers, supervisors and HR managers need to make sure that all employment decisions
regarding promotions, raises, bonuses, etc., are based on legitimate and nondiscriminatory
factors such as skill, merit and performance rather than an employee's membership in a protected
class. Employers should avoid wage differentials based on sex, race, national origin or any other
protected class unless they can be justified by legitimate and nondiscriminatory reasons.
Employers need to make sure that all supervisors and managers receive proper training on how
to avoid wage discrimination and make employment decisions based on legitimate and
nondiscriminatory reasons.
Employers should make sure that any salary guidelines or requirements for any bonus (whether it
is based on merit, productivity, sales or commissions) are well documented and based on fair,
objective, predictable and measurable criteria. This should be adequately conveyed to employees
so that they know what the employer's expectations are and are not left wondering how an
employer arrived at a particular decision.
Employers need to be aware that a number of states have laws prohibiting wage discrimination.
Although the federal EPA only specifically prohibits wage discrimination on the basis of sex,
some state laws may go beyond this. Employers should familiarize themselves with the laws of
the state and cities in which they operate.
Employers need to make sure to carefully document all decisions regarding pay, performance
and promotion. Doing so will provide an adequate record and serve as a defense in case of a
claim of wage discrimination.
Employers should frequently review their pay practices to make sure that they are not engaging
in discrimination. Employers should make sure that any differentials that do exist are based on
legitimate and nondiscriminatory factors and supported by written documentation, and if they are
not, they should correct them. By doing so, employers may dramatically reduce the chance that
they will be faced with a claim for wage discrimination.
Employers should try to make sure that they hire and recruit qualified candidates regardless of
gender or membership in a protected class. Employers and hiring managers should make
decisions based on education, skill and merit. Employers should avoid making stereotypical
assumptions about what a job applicant can and cannot do based on his or her membership in a
protected class.
Employers should aim to provide employees with yearly or biannual performance evaluations. In
doing so, employers should clearly set out the employer's expectations and show the employee
how the employee is meeting them or not meeting them.
Employers should not prohibit employees from discussing information regarding wages, salary
or benefits with other employees. The National Labor Relations Act specifically affords
employees the right to engage in mutual concerted protected activity and work collectively to
improve their wages, hours and working conditions. In addition, Colorado, California, Colorado,
Illinois and Michigan have laws that prohibit employers from requiring that employees refrain
from discussing their wages and/or waive their right to discuss such information.
Comparable worth:
Establishing a comparable worth plan has 4 steps:
1. Adopt a single job evaluation plan for all jobs within a unit.
2. All jobs with equal evaluation results should be paid same.
3. Identify general representation in each group
4. The wage-to-job evaluation point ratio should be based on the wages paid for male-
dominated jobs since they are presumed to be free of pay discrimination.
Budgets and Administration:
Budget:
A formal statement of the financial resources set aside for carrying out specific activities in a
given period of time.
Budgetary control:
Any differences (variances) are made the responsibility of key individuals who can either
exercise control action or revise the original budgets.
Compels management to think about the future, which is probably the most important feature
of a budgetary planning and control system. Forces management to look ahead, to set out
detailed plans for achieving the targets for each department, operation and (ideally) each
manager, to anticipate and give the organisation purpose and direction.
Problems in budgeting
Whilst budgets may be an essential part of any marketing activity they do have a number of
disadvantages, particularly in perception terms.
Budgets can be seen as pressure devices imposed by management, thus resulting in:
a) bad labour relations
b) inaccurate record-keeping.
Waste may arise as managers adopt the view, "we had better spend it or we will lose it". This is
often coupled with "empire building" in order to enhance the prestige of a department.
Responsibility versus controlling, i.e. some costs are under the influence of more than one
person, e.g. power costs.
Managers may overestimate costs so that they will not be blamed in the future should they
overspend.
Characteristics of a budget
In organising and administering a budget system the following characteristics may apply:
a) Budget centres: Units responsible for the preparation of budgets. A budget centre may
encompass several cost centres.
b) Budget committee: This may consist of senior members of the organisation, e.g. departmental
heads and executives (with the managing director as chairman). Every part of the organisation
should be represented on the committee, so there should be a representative from sales,
production, marketing and so on. Functions of the budget committee include:
liaising between the budget committee and managers responsible for budget preparation
dealing with budgetary control problems
ensuring that deadlines are met
educating people about budgetary control.
d) Budget manual:
This document:
Budget preparation
Firstly, determine the principal budget factor. This is also known as the key budget factor or
limiting budget factor and is the factor which will limit the activities of an undertaking. This
limits output, e.g. sales, material or labour.
a) Sales budget: this involves a realistic sales forecast. This is prepared in units of each product
and also in sales value. Methods of sales forecasting include:
b) Production budget: expressed in quantitative terms only and is geared to the sales budget. The
production manager's duties include:
subcontract
plan for overtime
introduce shift work
hire or buy additional machinery
The materials purchases budget's both quantitative and financial.
production requirements
planning stock levels
storage space
trends of material prices.
production requirements
man-hours available
grades of labor required
wage rates (union agreements)
the need for incentives.
e) Cash budget: a cash plan for a defined period of time. It summarizes monthly receipts and
payments. Hence, it highlights monthly surpluses and deficits of actual cash. Its main uses are:
to maintain control over a firm's cash requirements, e.g. stock and debtors
to enable a firm to take precautionary measures and arrange in advance for investment and loan
facilities whenever cash surpluses or deficits arises
to illustrate the financial impact of changes in management policy, e.g. change of credit terms
offered to customers.
cash sales
payments by debtors
the sale of fixed assets
the issue of new shares
the receipt of interest and dividends from investments.
purchase of stocks
payments of wages or other expenses
purchase of capital items
payment of interest, dividends or taxation.
Module 7: (8 Hours)
Global Compensation: Recognizing Variations, Social Contract, Culture & Pay, Strategic
Choices In Global Compensation, Comparing Systems, Expatriate Pay, Practical Components
The government
All enterprise owners
All employees
Relationships and expectations of these parties form the social contract
Culture
Shared mental programming rooted in values, beliefs, and assumptions shared in
common by a group of people
Influences how information is processed
Culture and Managing Pay
Assumption that pay systems must be designed to fit different national cultures is based
on the belief that most of a country’s inhabitants share a national character
Job of a global manager
– Search for national characteristics whose influence is assumed to be critical in
managing international pay systems
Culture Matters, but So Does Cultural Diversity:
How useful is the notion of a national culture when managing international pay?
– Only a starting point
– Can be thought of as the “average”
– Provides some information about what kinds of pay attitudes and beliefs you are
likely to find in an area
– Over reliance on the “average” can seriously mislead
Interplay among various conditions within each nation or region, taken as a whole, form
distinct contexts for determining compensation
– Economic
– Institutional
– Organizational
– Individual
Types of Expatriates:
Expatriates - Individuals whose citizenship is that of employer’s base country
Third country nationals (TCNs) - Individuals whose citizenship is neither employer’s
base country nor location of subsidiary
Local country nationals (LCNs) - Individuals who are citizens of country in which
subsidiary is located