A Systematic Review On Environmental Accounting: Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal May 2021
A Systematic Review On Environmental Accounting: Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal May 2021
net/publication/352311997
CITATIONS READS
0 1,270
3 authors:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Exploring Brand Equity of Tourist Hotels in the East Coast of Sri Lanka View project
7th International Symposium 2017 (IntSym2017)- SEUSL - 07th & 08th December 2017 View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Haleem Athambawa on 11 June 2021.
Purpose –The purpose of this study is to investigate Environmental Accounting and its
importance. The systematic review of academic and professional literature depicts that EA is
very useful and significant in controlling entities that are operating in environmentally sensitive
industries. The research papers that relating to the EA, which are available in Emerald, Taylor
and Francis, and also Oxford journal, were used for this systematic review. The probability of
published reports is a little bit unclear. The commitments of the companies towards sharing the
environmental cost are not disclosed. For better recognition and charging of environmental-
related costs, this system is necessary. So EA system provides a significant road map for internal
and external auditors in their achievements as well as assists the entities in enhancing
performance. There are many policy implications from both national and international levels.
The paper commits for improving knowledge relating to the EA in many ways. And the ideas
present in this paper are original.
INTRODUCTION
Environmental Accounting (EA) has become a novel branch of accounting science with the
formation of the concept of sustainable development of human society since the 1970s. EA
coming under the category of accounting since the early 1970s as a tool of reflecting and
supervising economic activities related to the environment. This is depicted through research on
the conversion of social costs in controlling pollution and also a paper on accounting problems of
pollution which has started the prelude of the EA research (Zhu Xueyi, 1999). EA got more
concern in the United Nations (UN) conference on Environment and Development in 1992 as
well as the report of UN World Environment and Development Committee in 1987 with the title
"Our Common Future." Since then, the researchers have carried out many types of research and
discussions on EA. The research by Rob Gray in 1990 on "Green Accounting: The Accounting
Profession after Pearce" is identified as a milestone on EA. It indicated that EA researches have
become the main subject area under discussion in the global academic circles. The characteristic
of EA is "accounting about increase or decrease on artificial assets and natural assets, most
importantly accounting of conversion between the two assets" (Grey, 1990), which means it
mainly studies and reveals artificial assets, natural assets, and transformation betwixt these
assets.
There are two different kinds of views on EA definition. EA is playing the role of "book noting"
is one of the views on EA. For example, it can take the argument of Peskin et al. (2001). They
argued that EA preparation over traditional measures of economic performances such as gross
domestic product (GDP), net domestic products (NDP), etc. For making the measurement
methods to reflect the environmental changes in a better way.
Management functions of EA emphasize the other view. For example, EA is to verify,
disseminate and analyze material flows via the usage of EA management system, which makes
managers to identify the environmental and pecuniary influence on the enterprises according to
the consideration (Steele & Powell, 2002).
The researchers try to form innovation theory and investigation of EA from various
perspectives with the development of EA research. Thus, the comprehension over EA has further
extended. The EA is not restricted only to enterprise accounting (Gray & Bebbington, 2001). The
features such as transparency, reliability, verifiability, auditability etc. should be there in EA
(Hines, 1988). This concept was expanded by Solomon & Thomson (2009), keeping that EA is a
system that provides information inflows and outflows for various organizations. Natural,
economic, ethical, and cultural resources are combines for measuring the environmental
efficiency and social efficiency of various firms.
The studies on EA theory in recent years have developed the theoretical basis on this as
well as necessary technologies and methods of EA, and carried out investigations from various
perspectives according to the latest research literature.
Many large-scale corporations such as Formosa, British Petroleum Corporation, and
Volkswagen's largest automobile manufacturing groups have collapsed because of the
information disclosure frauds relating to EA (Nguyen, 2019). It is a warning for business
organizations to enhance the awareness of environmental protection. There has been a
developing consideration about the accountability of organizations to report environmental
information in recent years. For the performance and reputation, the companies are anticipated to
reveal information relating to EA in their reports. The organization's pressure for reporting
accountability comes due to the request from investors and consumers as well as directives from
European Union (EU) (Spasic & Stojanovic, 2013).
Recent investigations on EA are gaining great consideration from researchers around the
world due to the significance of practicing and publishing EA information. Those investigations
have explained that environmental performance has the ability to improve stakeholders'
satisfaction, improves the brand image and also improves the firm value, and reducing the cost of
capital. The organizations with a higher earlier history of positive environmental performance
had very little risk for bankruptcy (Lin & Dong, 2018). The organizations with better
environmental performance have a low risk and prove that corporate environmental performance
is favorably related to organization's value (Cai et al., 2016; Fuadah et al., 2019). Environmental
performance can be considered as a way in venture processes with strong associations with
different stakeholders (Oikonomou et al.,2014). According to Yeh et al. (2019) Chinese firms
reduce their cost of debt capital due to higher environmental responsibility. It will make a great
commitment in decreasing organizations' equity financing costs when making investments in
enhancing environmental responsibility performance (Xu et al., 2015). The organizations with
best environmental responsibility performance have lower capital restrictions (Salvi et al., 2018).
METHODOLOGY
The current literature on the EA focuses on researching related academic papers instead of
devising new theories. For this reason, we have decided to use a systematic review strategy to
identify and coordinate the current information for analysis. This methodology builds on
research that draws on academic and primary sources by studying observational studies and peer-
reviewed journal papers. This research aims to produce a literature review and only legitimate
journals used for its source.
This article is based on the preferred reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-
Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines of (Moher et al., 2009). Describe this guideline, including the
two steps: systematic literature review and content analysis briefly. Specific methods which this
study follows is presented in section 2.1 by following the cited protocols. The study presented a
content analysis to recognize and for the organization of qualitative data from the literature for a
better comprehension of EA.
The term used to find the literature was EA and used Emerald, Oxford, and Taylor and
Francis journals to find the literature. These journals were used as they are large search systems
that employ multiple databases. The database was covered the period between 2000-2020. In
order to narrow the results to those published during the period, the date range was used. The
research used only peer-reviewed journal articles published in English. By using the same search
terms in Google, search engines were browsed by using the key terms to the study:
"Environmental Accounting”, "Social and Environmental Accounting", "Determinant of
Environmental Accounting," and combinations of these terms and other individual terms. These
search methods recognized 1127 records in total research articles. Redundant studies were
removed from the review, and further, Some articles were applied the same framework, then
those articles were excluded to prevent double counting. PRISMA flow diagram of the literature
search and the review is presented as follows.
1127 994
Eligibility
FIGURE 1
PRISMA FLOW DIAGRAM OF LITERATURE SEARCH AND REVIEW
Content Analysis
24 sources were chosen for the investigation, and each source was read in full for
qualitative content analysis. Information relating to EA was recorded in a spreadsheet. It was
organized into categories as title, author and year, and journal name. The information recognized
from the literature was added to cells under the categories as identified by the researchers.
The articles included in this study which were searched in Emerald and Taylor and Francis,
are presents in table 1. The table lists a title and reference of the research for each article.
Table 1
THEMATIC INFORMATION ON EA
Title Reference/ Source
"Environmental cost accounting and auditing." Letmathe, and Doost, (2000)
"The role of EA in organizational change An exploration of Carlos et al.,(2001)
Spanish companies."
"Product quality, EA and quality performance." Dunk, (2002)
"EA and change in UK local government" Ball, (2005)
"Social and environmental accountability research Parker,(2005)
A view from the commentary box."
"Sustainable development and EA: the challenge to the Herath, (2005)
economics and
accounting profession"
"National EA: A Practical Introduction" Hecht (2016)
"Accounting for The Effect of Health On Economic Growth" Nathan (2005)
"WHO’s Doing EA? A Survey of NSW Dairy Farms” Harrison and Lamberton, (2007)
“Chronicles of wasted time? A personal reflection on the Owen,(2008)
current state of, and future prospects for, social and EA
research”
“Determinants of EA practices in local entities: evidence Ribeiro and Guzman, (2010)
from Portugal.”
“Perceptions of corporate social and EA and reporting Islam and Dellaportas, (2011)
practices from accountants in Bangladesh.”
“Social and EA and Accountability” Van Staden et al., (2011)
“IFRS and EA” Negash, (2012)
“How does EA information influence attention and Alewine and Stone, (2013)
investment?”
“Determinants of EA and reporting practices in Portuguese Ribeiro, & Guzman, (2010).
local entities”
“Audit committees and financial reporting quality Al-Shaer, Salama, and Toms, (2017)
Evidence from UK EA disclosures”
“Economic analysis of using green accounting and EA to Rounaghi ,(2019)
identify environmental costs and sustainability indicators”
“Trends in EA research within and outside of the accounting Marrone et al., (2020)
discipline”
“The limits of EA disclosure: enforcement of regulations, Senn and Giordano-Spring, (2020)
standards, and interpretative strategies.”
“Designing the model of factors affecting in the Tooranloo and Shahamabad, (2020)
implementation of social and environmental
Accounting with the ISM approach.”
“Integrating financial, social and EA” Nicholls, (2020)
“Dynamic capabilities and EA for the circular economy in Scarpellini et al ., (2020)
businesses.”
“EA practices and cost of capital of enterprises in Vietnam.” Nguyen Huu Anh et al., (2020)
The research paper by Negash (2012) examined whether IFRSs can be utilized in
environmental degradation monitoring. Hence, according to the literature, IFRS gives a very
significant conceptual framework in administering the entities which are functioning in
environmentally sensitive industries. The researcher used qualitative and case study methods,
and the financial statements of three companies that are environmentally sensitive were studied.
The findings reveal that the reports created by the companies compromising both information
and propaganda. And there was an unclarity of the credibility of published reports. As well the
cost for decommissioning, rehabilitation, and restoration of the environment have not been
disclosed.
Letmathe, and Doost, (2000) stated that In making a decision on environmental effects, a
cost accounting scheme could be turned on its head. So that decisions will affect the flow and
not the other way around. It employs cause-and-effect analyses to estimate the expense of the
environmental impacts. The research uses an EA scheme to explain both internal and external
audits. And if goals and benchmarks are met, the knowledge helps in judging success.
Indisputably, there is a high degree of processing inefficiencies in the environment. Removing
them would help the firm meet its environmental and financial targets.
Carlos et al. (2001) showed that Theory developed earlier on the importance of
"sustainable enterprise" created EA as a concept to attract attention and used it to research
business transformation. They concluded that EA has been misreporting prevalent in
corporations that have not substantially altered their impact on the environment. They have
applied Gray et al. model’s and findings to diverse cultures. While there are changes in Spain's
social and organizational structures, they were unable to observe an inversion of traditional
views of the world at work.”
Hecht (2016) stated that environmental issues have been high on the public agenda for
many years. As far back as the 1970s, several European countries were still doing environmental
experiments, and in the late 1980s, the UN and other foreign organizations followed suit with
similar efforts. This was followed by the release of an interim accounting handbook in 1993, and
then the release of a more thorough accounting guide in 2003.
Herath, (2005) studied to determine whether or not natural resources serve as a positive
influence on sustainable development. Resource accounting is relevant because GDP does not
only provides short-term measures of a country's health. It identifies the current status, the limits,
as well as the possibilities for the design and accounting careers. A key shortcoming of GDP as a
growth metric is that it fails to account for environmental impact. Improvement is complicated
by the measurement of environmental harm, however, and in order to get a better concept, it
includes including the use of natural resources. The obstacle to the economics and accounting
profession is to consider the world clearly, to have accurate assessment methods, and to
accommodate different groups'. The new ideas presented in this paper which blend various
concepts and creative skills to chart an innovative course for EA.
In macroeconomic terms, Nathan (2005) stated that the researcher used microeconomic
estimates of the impact of health on personal outcomes to calculate its macroeconomic effects on
an individual. The different methodologies used to produce various estimates for height, age at
menarche, and adult mortality are drawn from research in the country and cross-nation studies.
The finding is economically significant, and it is also substantially smaller than estimates of the
effect of health on economic growth that are derived from cross-country regressions.
The study by Letmathe and Doost (2000) concludes that an environmental cost accounting
system that is based on a cause-and-effect association is necessary. It is very important for better
recognition and proper charging of costs relating to the environment. Further, they concluded
that improvements achieved due to the creation of an efficient environmental cost accounting
could assist the entity in achieving its goals.
GDP is a measure of development, and it does not take damages to environmental
resources. So, it is the main weakness of GDP (Gamini, 2005). According to Gamini (2005), it is
difficult to measure environmental damages. So, the development of the concept to include
environmental resources is made difficult. Larrinaga et al. (2001) studied the association between
EA and organizational change in Spanish context using Gray et al.’s model. So, the researchers
used nine companies in various industries with a variety of views on EA in Spain. Six companies
out of nine companies were replied to a previous postal questionnaire. Then again, another three
companies were added to provide a complete view of various industries. Larrinaga et al. (2001)
revealed that Spanish organizations were not changing their traditional view of the environment
as well as the usage of EA is doubled with an effort to discuss and monitor the environmental
agenda.
Execution of EA and product quality are significant facts in improving quality performance
(Dunk, 2002). The researcher focused on determining quality performance considering both
product quality and EA. The researcher used three variables such as product quality, EA, and
quality performance. For the purpose of the study, a random sample of 119 functional area
executives was used in Australian manufacturing companies listed in Kompass Australia (1995).
EA can be said to also to add to the efficiency of operations. So long as environmental concerns
are given the same consideration as economic, the higher the company will be, the overall
results. If product quality and EA have an impact on efficiency, then it does go hand in hand with
the implementation or has the opposite effect.
The research paper by Ball (2005) explores EA in terms of sustainable development. The
researcher used a case study of how a UK local state council is responding to an environmental
agenda in terms of an array of gradual political, functional, and community pressures to change
its activities. The researcher reveals that loosen EA is pressed in to use for promoting such
changes.
Parker (2005) also performed an investigation in social and EA. The investigation used
two major prior seminal papers on this area. It investigates the remit for SEA researches
concentrated on policies and practices. It offers an empirical analysis of social and EA
publications. Parker (2005) recognized theories in two groups. They are augmentation and
heartland theories. The findings revealed that environmental researches dominate more recent
publications on SEA. Literature-based theorizing, national practices, comparisons, and
regulations are the most prominent methodological approaches. The study by Owen (2008)
presented a critical review on the development and current state of social and EA using the
reference from Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal.
Ribeiro and Guzman,(2010) investigated the degree of execution of EA practices in local
Portuguese entities. Data were collected using a questionnaire which was posted to medium-
sized and large city councils and also sent to the municipal companies. The findings revealed that
the extent of development of EA practices of local entities in Portugal is low. And also, the
prevailing compulsory EA standards are not positively associated with developing EA practices
by domestic entities in Portugal.
Islam and Dellaportas (2011) carried out a study with the purpose of eliciting the view of
accountants regarding corporate social and EA and reporting practices in a developing country
like Bangladesh. Members of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Bangladesh (IACB) were
surveyed to determine views on problems pertaining to social and EA and reporting practices in
Bangladesh. The findings revealed that accountants have positive attitudes towards social and
EA, and the progress is limited.
Alewine and Stone (2013) conducted a study on “How does EA information influence
attention and investment?” and stated that Strategic choices are now closely linked to
environmental issues because of their implications. The results integrate environmental data into
a sustainability scorecard, which is known as the biodiversity balanced scorecard. They
suggested that, however, as data on the atmosphere was introduced, the process of allocating
attention shifted, which led to changes in environmental data usage; thus, the type of EA data
matters, too. The study is one of the first to demonstrate how expenditure and attention vary
through the existence and accessibility of environmental evidence.
Ribeiro, and Guzman, (2010) underlined to analyze the local organizations' use of EA
practices. A series of questionnaires were sent to medium and large and small cities and other
local governments, regional, district, and regional government entities. Three variables were
taken into account into the study of EA practices in the public sector growth of accounting.
Environment accounting processes in Portuguese institutions are undeveloped in the company
size and environmental maturity to both need and ability. Hence, the results showed that there
was no relationship between implementing compulsory environmental requirements and the
establishment of EA practices in the country. The research focuses on Portugal, which is now
going through a period on increased regulations of environmental disclosure. This will help local
regulators understand the EA and monitoring processes currently in place in Portugal and
provide a framework for developing more appropriate environmental controls. This paper filled
this void in the existing body of EA literature by including a summary of the methods used by
Portuguese city halls and other local government organizations.
Al-Shaer, et al. (2017) aimed to investigate the factors that affect the number of
environmental disclosures. If the size of a firm's stockholders was increased, the number of
filings is not impacted. This is more confirmation to show the findings can be valid in other
countries. The incongruent signification Narrative accounting regulations related to
environmental problems are eased by creative solutions. Corporate governance systems,
primarily audit committees, have studied the connection between environmental narratives and
financial reporting using volunteer information.
Rounaghi (2019) showed that environmental management is a significant criterion for
evaluating a company's performance for businesses to work together as a team of chemical
engineers, plant managers, staff, and buying agents. Almost all businesses are finding ways to
deal with the climate and report on it. Today's human world faces one of the most serious
environmental issues. For this purpose, EA is important. The fining showed that green
accounting seeks to include environmental charges in the financial activities other than
addressing the question if the economy performed during a given time, GDP can also be useful
in economic policymaking and/ as a measure of progress. Accounting for the environment is
important in all industry sectors, no matter the size. Big or small, depending on the situation, EA
may be used. It is essential to collect data from all organizational subunits. People who belong to
different interest groups need to speak to each other to reach a shared environmental goal.
Clearly, accountants will have a perfect foundation for economic and financial regulations. In
order to accomplish this purpose, EA goals and activities should be specified thoroughly, the
guidelines and regulations should be defined based on practical concepts.
In their research, Marrone, et al. (2020) examined to show topics and concepts as they
appear using a machine learning approach for literature reviews. It has been found that articles
on corporate social responsibility (CSR) and stakeholder theory have proliferated within
accounting journals in the last few years. These might not be reliable sources of information
(e.g., accounting for ecosystem services). It offers a tool for defining “trending” subjects in
accounting and non-accounting publications. The authors do a much-needed analysis on EA.
From a different point of view, Senn, and Giordano-Spring, (2020) studied to get
information into the world of company EA disclosure, which is not much done previously. The
analysis takes advantage of a system based on normativity. Their research is focused on annual
reports. And further, Semi-structured interviews with 20 senior employees at these same
companies offer interpretative interpretations of the statistics. Their results suggested that EA
(EA) is still in its infancy. The low level of regulatory clarity allows for varying interpretations
of evidence to be applied in the financial reporting of certain organizations. They have concluded
that environmental spending and responsibility will exist independently, and regulators would
find this analysis very beneficial when environmental rules are subject to modification, as well as
useful for consumers. The study contributes to the body of research on the matter. To better
understand how various actors and networks approach regulatory policies that contributes to EA
norms.
In increased research, interest exists with respect to the EA, Tooranloo and Shahamabad,
(2020) focused solely on the economy, and financial problems have had little effect on
improving society but caused increased damage. However, proper accounting will offset the
damage, as well as boost environmental concerns. For that purpose, social and EA continues to
expand and evolve as time goes by. According to emerging theories and expert views, seven
areas were identified as key factors affecting social and EA implementation: respectively,
financial accounting standards, environmental justice, environmental accountability, corporate
challenges, environmental regulation, financial compliance, resource protection, and risk
mitigation, and legal responsibilities. The two methodologies employed in their study employed
structural modeling and MICMAC techniques to analyze the relationships. The findings showed
that legal obligation is one of the causal factors. However, the majority of the characteristics are
governed by statutory and regulatory standards. As a result, it is necessary to pay serious
attention to legal standards in order to get the social and EA to work. This also places a premium
on enhanced environmental sustainability because the climate plays a unique role in societies'
sustainable growth. To circumvent social and environmental costs and losses, the
implementation of the social and EA model was created in their study. It seems that including all
established variables will lead to big gains in terms of strengthening and increasing social and
EA. This is the first to provide a consistent and robust implementation model for social and EA.
Nicholls, (2020) examined financial reporting from its nineteenth-century origins in the
light of a better understanding of policy, individual preferences, and how the market operates on
a global scale. Many methods of using combining financial and social information use is correct;
these two categories of data sit opposite each other. Both the positive and negative aspects of the
new approaches to evaluating social and environmental performance are left unexamined.
Changing this strategy would entail a consensus among wealth managers, population, civil
society, and legislative members, as well as a strategy for exiting the current approach.
Considering social consequences, this could be the foundation for any number of valuable
research projects that might help policymakers formulate capital allocations that take
environmental and social ramifications into consideration into account. There are many ways to
integrate social and financial accounting; however, by aligning the public policy with investor
interest, we can solve several of the problems that come from any of those methods.
According to Harrison and Lamberton, (2007), previously, Australian farmers were found
to be much less open to environmental accounting with low levels of self-sufficiency. This paper
explores the findings of a survey of 204 NSW dairy farmers who failed to find financial
professionals, which concludes that most farmers produce environmental accounting without
consulting with accountants, a crucial partner. According to the study, people who join
discussion groups that focus on environmental issues are more likely to seek out and accumulate
knowledge on the topics of environmental accounting. Studies revealed no direct correlation
between the level of education, the nature of business training, or farm size and the degree of
environmental accounting.
Nguyen Huu Anh et al., (2020) examined to investigate the nexus between the level of
environmental, financial accounting practices (EFAP) and the cost of capital. In this study, there
were 1288 long-year data observations. However, 73 firms could not do adequate financial
analysis due to the lack of such data, and 35 firms did not have ample data to measure the
financial return on capital. Finally, the report used a subset of 672 firm-year findings from 2013
to 2017 firms from the country's stock exchange listings for analysis for five years. Econometric
problems and improved coefficients of regression are resolved by using two-stage regression
with the lag. Firms with better EFAP outcomes reduced their cost of capital over time. The study
concluded that the relationship between EFAP and the cost of capital is not affected by capital
structure.
Scarpellini et al. (2020) adopted a theory known as 'dynamic capacities' in order to further
assess environmental competencies. As companies focus on environmental capabilities, CSR,
environmental monitoring, and auditing, these are conducted using the same methodological
methodology used to research environmental impact. This study contributes to the understanding
of the link between EA analysis and market practices in the implementation of circular economy.
Environmental skills were measured with partial least squares analysis for companies with more
than 50 workers who were interested in eco-design, eco-innovation, eco-design, and green issues.
There was shown to be a strong correlation between the use of complex skills theories and firms'
degree of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and EA practices. Stakeholders' influence which
mediates the role of small companies, is being enhanced by additional research that focuses on
its effect on specific groups of stakeholders. Researchers also investigate whether a business's
creativity affects environmental and financial health. The incongruent signification of the new
findings established in this study allows circular economy practitioners to solve the traditional
approach's problems and integrate a larger range of environmental knowledge. The benchmarks
show both small and medium-sized businesses how to further self-internal assessment systems
contribute to CSR. For governments, a greater understanding of the circular economy's entrance
into the industry would aid in the development of policies that specifically favor its use in
different regions. These results are also relevant to the way customers and partners interact with
each other and to facilitate corporate social responsibility. This study goes beyond prior studies
on circular economy to include EA as well as applying the circular economy from a transversal
point of view. In the scope of dynamic skills, a review of accounting decisions in corporate and
environmental competencies is very innovative.
This paper commits to multiple kinds of literature, which includes EA. In order to build up
knowledge on accounting principles, practices, standards, and measures, this EA research offers
unique and growing chances for accounting scholars and professionals. Awareness on the global
environment considerate permeates society. Academic or professional disciplines will not be
immune from their ubiquitous implications. For instance, accounting academicians can commit
to these efforts by carrying out researches in order to benefit the public interest by improving the
comprehension of accounting implications of environmental issues.
When considering environmental cost accounting, it is necessary to have an environmental
cost accounting system based on cause-and-effect association. For better recognition and
charging of environmental-related costs, this system is necessary. So EA system provides a
significant road map for internal and external auditors in their achievements as well as helps the
firms for improving performance. This will lead to achieving organizational goals, complying
with environmental laws, and commits to the health of the ecology for future generations as well.
This study explains the theories at various levels in describing EA. There are many positive
impacts from EA on organizational performance improvement. So, there should be further
researches on this area. But, the prevailing practice of environmental reporting must be critically
examined.
REFERENCE
Alewine, H.C., & Stone, D.N. (2013). How does Environmental Accounting information influence attention and
investment? International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 21(1), 22-52.
Al-Shaer, H., Salama, A., & Toms, S. (2017). Audit committees and financial reporting quality: evidence from UK
EA disclosures, Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 18(1), 2-22.
Ball, A. (2005). Environmental Accounting and change in UK local government, Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal, 18(3), 346-373.
Cai, L., Cui, J., & Jo, H. (2016). Corporate environmental responsibility and firm risk, Journal of Business Ethics,
139(3), 563–594.
Carlos, L.G., Francisco, C.F., Francisco, J.G., Carmen, CorreaRuíz, J.M.P. (2001).The role of environmental
accounting in organizational change #an exploration of spanish companies, Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal, 14(2), 213–239.
Dunk, A.S. (2002). Product Quality, Environmental Accounting, and Quality Performance. Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal, 15(5), 719-732.
Dunk, A.S. (2002). Product quality, Environmental Accounting and quality performance", Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal, 15(5), 719-732.
Fuadah, L.L., Arisman, A., Wardani, R.S., & Yunita, A. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility Mediates
Corporate Governance Index and Financial Performance Indonesia, Academy of Accounting and Financial
Studies Journal, 23(1), 1–8.
Ghoul, S.E., Guedhami, O.C.Y., Kwok, C., & Mishara, D.R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the
cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388–2406.
Gray, R.H., & Bebbington, K.J. (2001). Accounting for the Environment 2nd Edition (London: Sage)
Harrison, J.L., & Lamberton, G. (2007). Who’S Doing EA? A Survey of NSW Dairy Farms, Rural
Society, 17(2), 182-195.
Hecht, J.E (2016). National EA: A Practical Introduction, International Review of Environmental and Resource
Economics, 1(1), 3-66.
Herath, G. (2005). Sustainable development and Environmental Accounting: the challenge to the economics and
accounting profession. International Journal of Social Economics, 32, 1035–1050.
Herath, G. (2005). Sustainable development and Environmental Accounting: the challenge to the economics and
accounting profession, International Journal of Social Economics, 32(12), 1035-1050.
Hines, R.D. (1988). Financial accounting: in communicating reality, we construct reality, Accounting,
Organizations and Society, 13(3), 251-261.
Islam, M., & Dellaportas, S. (2011). Perceptions of corporate social and Environmental Accounting and reporting
practices from accountants in Bangladesh, Social Responsibility Journal, 7(4), 649-664.
Jha, A., & Cox, J. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and social capital. Journal of Banking & Finance,
60(2), 252–270.
Larrinaga‐González, C., Carrasco‐Fenech, F., Caro‐González, F.J., Correa‐Ruíz, C. and María Páez‐Sandubete,
J. (2001). The role of EA in organizational change ‐An exploration of Spanish companies, Accounting,
Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(2), 213-239.
Letmathe, P., & Doost, R.K. (2000). Environmental cost accounting and auditing, Managerial Auditing Journal,
15(8), 424-431.
Lin, K.C., & Dong, X. (2018). Corporate social responsibility engagement of financially distressed firms and their
bankruptcy likelihood, Advances in Accounting, 43(1), 32–45.
Marrone, M., Linnenluecke, M.K., Richardson, G., & Smith, T. (2020). Trends in Environmental Accounting
research within and outside of the accounting discipline, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,
33(8), 2167-2193.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D.G. (2009). The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for
systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 6, 1–6.
Nathan, D.W (2005). Accounting for the effect of health on economic growth. Brown University Economic
Working Paper No. 2005-07, Available at
SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=764484 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.764484
Negash, M. (2012). IFRS and Environmental Accounting, Management Research Review, 35(7), 577-601.
Nguyen, L.S., Tran, M.D., Nguyen, T.X.H., & Le, Q.H. (2017). Factors affecting disclosure levels of EA
information: The case of Vietnam, Accounting and Finance Research, 6(4), 255–264.
Nguyen, L.S. (2019). Relationship between environmental financial accounting practices and corporate financial
risk: Evidence from listed companies in Vietnam’s securities market, Asian Economic and Financial Review,
9(2), 285–298.
Nguyen, L.S., & Tran, M.D. (2019). Disclosure levels of Environmental Accounting information and financial
performance: The case of Vietnam, Management Science Letters, 9(4), 557–570.
Nguyen, H.A., Nguyen, L.S., & Ha Hong, H. (2020). Environmental Accounting practices and cost of capital of
enterprises in Vietnam, Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1).
Nguyen Huu Anh, Nguyen La Soa & Ha Hong Hanh (2020). Environmental Accounting practices and cost of capital
of enterprises in Vietnam, Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1).
Nicholls, J.A. (2020). Integrating Financial, Social and Environmental Accounting, Sustainability Accounting,
Management and Policy Journal, 11(4), 745-769.
Oikonomou, I., Brooks, C., & Brooks, C. (2014). The effects of corporate social performance on the cost of
corporate debt and credit ratings, Financial Review, 49(1), 49–75.
Owen, D. (2008). Chronicles of wasted time? A personal reflection on the current state of, and future prospects for,
social and EA research, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(2), 240-267
Parker, L.D. (2005). Social and environmental accountability research: A view from the commentary
box, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(6), 842-860.
Peskin, Henry M., & Delos Angeles, Marian S., (2001). Accounting for environmental services: contrasting the
SESA and the ENRAP approaches, Review of Income and Wealth, 47(2), 203–219.
Ribeiro, V.P.L., & Guzman, C.A. (2010). Determinants of Environmental Accounting practices in local entities:
evidence from Portugal, Social Responsibility Journal, 6(3), 404419.
Rounaghi, M.M. (2019). Economic analysis of using green accounting and Environmental Accounting to identify
environmental costs and sustainability indicators, International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 35, 504–512.
Salvi, A., Petruzzella, F., & Giakoumelou, A. (2018). Does sustainability foster the cost of equity reduction? The
relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and riskiness worldwide, African Journal of
Business Management, 12(12), 381–395.
Scarpellini, S., Marín-Vinuesa, L.M., Aranda-Usón, A.Y., & Portillo-Tarragona, P. (2020). Dynamic capabilities
and EA for the circular economy in businesses, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal,
11(7), 1129-1158.
Senn, J., & Giordano-Spring, S. (2020). The limits of Environmental Accounting disclosure: enforcement of
regulations, standards and interpretative strategies, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(6),
1367-1393.
Solomon J.F., & Thomson I. (2009). Satanic Mills? An illustration of Victorian external Environmental Accounting,
Accounting Forum, 33, 74-87.
Spasi , D., Stojanovi , . ). Sustainability reporting - theoretical framework and practice in the serbian oil
industry, Economics and Organization, 10(3).
Steele, A.P., & Powell, J.R. (2002). Environmental Accounting: Applications for Local Authorities to Quantify
Internal and External Costs of Alternative Waste Management Strategies. Environmental Management
Accounting Network Europe, Fifth Annual Conference, loucestershire Business School,
Tooranloo, H.S., & Shahamabad, M.A.(2020). Designing the model of factors affecting in the implementation of
social and Environmental Accounting with the ISM approach, International Journal of Ethics and Systems,
36(3), 387-410.
Van Staden, C.J., Kern, T., McGuigan, N., & Wild, S. (2011). Social and Environmental Accounting and
Accountability, Accounting Forum, 35(3), 127-129.
Yeh, C.C. , Lin, F., Wang, T.S., & Wu, C.M. (2019). Does corporate social responsibility affect cost of capital in
China? Asia Pacific Management Review.
Zhu Xueyi. (1999). A preliminary study on China's Environmental Accounting. Accounting Research, 4:26-30 Feng
Qiaogen. 2011. Environment cost management seen from KD paper companies. Accounting Research, 10, 88
– 95.
Xu, S., Liu, D., & Huang, J. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, the cost of equity capital and ownership
structure: An analysis of Chinese listed firms.