0% found this document useful (0 votes)
142 views

Mechanical Engineering Department Rubric Lab Report Experiment: Total Name Matrix Number 50 10%

1) The document provides a rubric for evaluating lab reports in a Mechanical Engineering department. It assesses aspects such as the aim/objective, introduction, work materials/equipment, work method/procedure, analysis/results, discussion, and conclusion. 2) Each aspect is scored on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being "excellent". Criteria for each score level is provided to guide the evaluation. For example, the aim/objective would score higher if the purpose and relevant variables were clearly defined. 3) The rubric aims to provide a standardized way to evaluate lab reports and ensure they sufficiently document the experiment, calculations, and conclusions based on the

Uploaded by

Aiman Azahar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
142 views

Mechanical Engineering Department Rubric Lab Report Experiment: Total Name Matrix Number 50 10%

1) The document provides a rubric for evaluating lab reports in a Mechanical Engineering department. It assesses aspects such as the aim/objective, introduction, work materials/equipment, work method/procedure, analysis/results, discussion, and conclusion. 2) Each aspect is scored on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being "excellent". Criteria for each score level is provided to guide the evaluation. For example, the aim/objective would score higher if the purpose and relevant variables were clearly defined. 3) The rubric aims to provide a standardized way to evaluate lab reports and ensure they sufficiently document the experiment, calculations, and conclusions based on the

Uploaded by

Aiman Azahar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

RUBRIC LAB REPORT

EXPERIMENT: TOTAL

NAME MATRIX NUMBER 50 10%

SCORE MARKS

1 2 3 4 5
ASPECT
(UNSATISFIED) (SATISFIED) (FAIR) (GOOD) EXCELLENT)

CLO3, PLO5
Purpose and Purpose is Purpose and
Purpose defined Purpose and
relevant vague and variables
Aim/Objective but variables are variables clearly /5
variables not variables not somewhat
unclear. defined.
defined. defined. defined.
Reasonable
Little relation Effort made to Clear relation
No introduction relation between
Introduction between result relate result and between result /5
made. result and
and introduction. introduction. and introduction.
introduction.
Did not list one Made complete
List of materials Made complete
or two items list of materials
was missing or list of materials
Work Material/ Equipment not used. Did not used. Showed
showed only a used. Explained /5
Equipment available. show details information about
few of the why materials
about items size units of
materials used. were chosen.
used. measurement.
Description was
general or did Setup was
Setup included
not include documented
Setup was not Description was descriptive text
diagrams. completely.
described or general fair. and diagrams
Procedure was Method was
documented. Information were provided if
Work-Method missing multiple documented
Step-by-step provided is appropriate. /15
/Procedure steps. completely and
procedure was sufficient to Experiment can
Information accurately,
missing or replicate be reproduced
provided is not making
inadequate. experiment. using the steps
sufficient to experiment easy
provided.
replicate to reproduce.
experiment.
Some All calculations
Some calculations are shown with All calculations
No calculations calculations are are shown minor error and are shown
with minor
are shown and shown with most questions correctly and
error and
no questions are major error and some can be answered questions can be
Analysis Data answered. no questions are questions can and reported in a answered and
answered. be answered short and reported in a short /5
& Result
and reported complete. and complete.
in a short and
complete.

PNS-PA-04 (7)
P:0 02.08.2021
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

SCORE MARKS

1 2 3 4 5
ASPECT
(UNSATISFIED) (SATISFIED) (FAIR) (GOOD) EXCELLENT)

CLO3, PLO5
Accurate Accurate
statement on statements
Discussion on results that supporting
No or little Discussion is results which support introduction.
Discussion /5
discussion. incomplete. support introduction. Limitation
introduction. Limitations of discussed &
accuracy solution
discussed. recommended.

Problem was Restated problem


restated. and aim. Justified
Statements and design and
Original problem Problem was
conclusions method of work.
was not stated.
were based on Findings were
restated. Conclusions
No summarized the data discussed in
Conclusion/ Findings were were simplistic.
and conclusion collected. detail. /5
Recommendations not summarized. No clear
was made. Showed a Conclusions
Conclusions relationship
strong directly address
were not between
relationship aim. Statements
relevant. conclusions.
between and conclusions
conclusion and were supported by
aim. data.

All sources are


Most sources
Fails to correctly Almost all sources correctly and
Most sources are correctly
document any are used, quoted thoroughly
References/ are used, not documented;
sources or to correctly, documented;
appropriate appropriate /5
utilize appropriate appropriate
citation forms citation forms
appropriate citation forms are citation forms are
are utilized. are generally
citation forms. generally utilized. utilized
utilized.
throughout.

PNS-PA-04 (7)
P:0 02.08.2021

You might also like