The Technologies Reinventing Physical Retail
The Technologies Reinventing Physical Retail
Retail
In-store mobile apps and micro-fulfilment tech can address consumer pain points
and enable companies to incorporate their physical retail networks into
omnichannel shopping journeys.
KEY INSIGHTS
In store, customers who engage with technology spend up to four times longer
shopping than those who do not.
Mobile apps provide a frictionless shopping journey, whether a customer is
seeking convenience or an engaging, social experience.
Micro-fulfilment technologies enable brands to process orders efficiently from
stores, reducing associated costs by up to 90 percent, and can lead to higher
conversion and customer satisfaction rates.
But physical retail is far from dead. A 2020 survey of European consumers
showed that 60 percent of respondents wanted to see or touch products in-person
before buying, while 50 percent shopped in stores so they can take items home
immediately. As pandemic restrictions subside, the percentage of customers
shopping online is expected to fall 3 percentage points from 2021 levels across
key markets, including Europe, the US and China. This presents an opportunity
for players to reshape the role of stores in their overall retail mix.
For example, 20 percent of customers are dissatisfied with online delivery and
returns. Mobile-based technologies that tailor and streamline the in-store
experience and micro-fulfilment technologies that incorporate stores into
distribution networks could help address these challenges.
For the convenience-driven shopper, mobile apps can combine digital and
physical shopping experiences in an efficient end-to-end journey. Fast-fashion
retailer Zara’s customer app, for example, allows shoppers to book fitting rooms,
see available stock, find products on the shop floor and join a virtual queue to
complete a purchase. The user experience of such apps needs to work seamlessly
within the customer journey, and the technology can build on existing backend
software, such as inventory management and point-of-sale software.
Fashion executives should direct investment towards in-store
technologies that specifically address operational pain points and fit
seamlessly into the customer journey.
These technologies also offer brands significant data insights into customers even
if they do not make a purchase, through scanned product tags or tracking items
taken into fitting rooms. Store associates can have apps designed for them, so that
they can use this customer data and improve workflow management, such as
requesting stock for a customer to be brought to the shop floor quickly.
How brands leverage available mobile technology depends on their strategic
priorities. In the mass market, a high proportion of sales may already be
generated through e-commerce apps. Here, a brand could develop an “in-store”
mode to bolt onto an existing app. In the luxury segment, e-commerce apps
commonly account for less than 10 percent of sales, which means it will be more
challenging to encourage customers to adopt app-based behaviours.
Some mass-market players such as Target are repurposing space within physical
store networks to create micro-fulfilment centres, helping them to adapt to quick
commerce and ultra-fast delivery expectations. This is often through buy online,
pick up in store (BOPIS) models or buy online, ship from store (BOSFS), where
the order is sent from a store where all items are in stock. However, to date, most
players have not gone digital. Typically, keeping track of stock is done manually
and in-store stock is not integrated into overall e-commerce stock.
Stock optimisation technologies can help speed up and automate a store’s value
chain. For example, fast-fashion giant Inditex uses RFID product tags that feed
into a single inventory system. This gives visibility into stock levels across
channels, allowing for online order fulfilment from store stock. This visibility has
reduced the time required for store associates to take a store inventory by 88
percent.
But without technology that can streamline the fulfilment process, from order
allocation to packing, a brand will likely need either high-value orders or a
boutique model with low levels of in-store traffic to justify manual in-store
fulfilment.
Therefore, automation can play an important role across all types of fulfilment
models to help brands maximise cost savings. Brands can use stock optimisation
software, which incorporates all stock across their store and distribution
networks; last mile optimisation software, which boosts the efficiency of
allocating order delivery routes; employee task management solutions; and fully
robotic set-ups that include robotic grids and arms for picking, packing and
storing stock.
When deciding which stores to use for e-commerce fulfilment and what
fulfilment model to pursue, executives should consider the brand’s size, store
density and e-commerce activity, as well as physical store locations and customer
demand. For instance, luxury brands will probably not devote retail space
exclusively to fulfilling orders because of the high costs of their stores’ prime
locations. Instead, they will focus on stock optimisation algorithms to predict the
best location from which to fulfil an order and pick and pack manually —
something mass-market players simply cannot afford to do. For mass-market
brands, automated e-commerce order fulfilment can make financial sense if order
volume is high enough and in a dense, urban area — even more so if customers
are paying a premium for faster delivery.