A
A
whilst others disagree and think that at least university students should pay for
their education. Although free education would help decrease the ittileracy rate,
yet improving education sector needs more money in order to meet the
education criterias.
On the one hand, it's argued that free tuition fees would positively affect the
economic status of citizens and maximize literacy levels of community.
Education, which is free of charge, will help young university students minimising
their financial burden, that is because young undergraduate students, in general,
do not have any source of funds. Besides, free education would affect the
ignorance rate of the community.
On the other hand, others argue that, at least, college students should pay for
their university, as university has its own massive costs, and authorities usually
are not able to afford that substantial budget. However, sometimes officials do
hold the responsibility for the the education fees, but they can not provide best-
quality facilities. Therefore, to provide a standard education quality, students
should enroll in part or full expenses of their studies. For example, in some
developed countries, like the UK and the USA, students loan from bank for their
studies, and they would pay back the loan after they graduated and found a job.
To conclude, free education holds many positive advantages, for it decreases the
ignorance rate among people and could help them financially. Nonetheless, from
my point of view, higer education needs more support amd funds to keep its high-
quality, so it's logical if university students kept in charge for their study costs.