Department of Social Welfare and Development

Region 1

Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program

Analysis Of
Social Welfare and Development Indicator
Baseline Data
(August-October 2015)

(TAYUG, PANGASINAN)
TAYUG Operations Office

Table of Contents
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

I - Abstract ----------------------------------------------------------------------
3
-

II - Introduction ----------------------------------------------------------------------
5
-

III - SWDI Results ----------------------------------------------------------------------

16
-

IV - Conclusion ----------------------------------------------------------------------
97
-

V - Recommendation ----------------------------------------------------------------------
97
-

VI - References ----------------------------------------------------------------------
97
-

Page 2 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

I. Abstract

Social Welfare Indicator is a tool used to assess the level of well-being of every Pantawid Pamilya Household.
Using the SWDI form/score sheet and the SWDI booklet, the MOO staffs were able to determine the statuses of living
of their partner beneficiaries if it’s survival, subsistence and self-sufficient during their house to house visits. Survival
scores 1.00 to 1.83, while Subsistence is from 1.84 to 2.83 and finally self-sufficient covers from 2.84 to 3.00
respectively.

The Social Welfare Indicators (SWI) was first developed by the Ministry of Social Services
and Development (MSSD) in 1980 under Deputy Minister Ms. Sylvia P. Montes. It was formulated based on
a study of field workers’ experiences in assisting individuals and needy families uplift their lives
from stagnation and degradation to level befitting dignified human beings.

To measure the progress of upliftment, the MSSD identified three levels of family well–being:
Survival, Subsistence and Self-Sufficiency. There are two major indicators of family well-being -economic
sufficiency and social adequacy. A score matrix is used to determine the level of well-being of a
client/household by getting the average of the actual scores of the indicators.

Furthermore, the new SWI has the following features as a result of the updating:

 The indicators are formulated to measure the quality of life of a household and not the
provision of social welfare services to the household;

 the unit intervention of is the household and not the family in consonance with the program
framework of the Pantawid Pamilya and the NHTS;

 The SWI shall be used as assessment, planning, monitoring and evaluation tool in case
management process of poor households, primarily the Pantawid Pamilya by social
workers/case managers;

 The three levels of well-being: survival, subsistence and self-sufficiency and the indicators
of economic sufficiency and social adequacy are still relevant and appropriate, thus will
continue to be used;

 The variables and sub-variables to measure economic sufficiency and social adequacy have
been updated and enhanced in accordance with current living conditions and situations and
standards of living; and

 The scoring matrix has been slightly modified.

Page 3 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

It is on the year 2014 that the DSWD after series of workshops had opted to use the SWDI
once again to measure the progress of beneficiaries in the Pantawid Pamilya CCT program.

The SWDI assessment was conducted between the months of August to first week of
October 2015, through and with the help of the following DSWD staffs.

Ultimately, the conduct of SWDI is for determining the progress of poverty alleviation efforts if it is due,
necessary and effective. In Tayug per se, Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program started September 2012 where 1,096
were catered from the list sifted and endorsed by the NHT-PR (now LISTAHANAN) after the community assembly.

At present, Tayug has 1,164 household active household beneficiaries assessed from the 21 barangays using
the enhanced SWDI tool with 22 indicators under two the major components namely Economic Sufficiency and Social
Adequacy. Among which, 284 households are self-sufficient, 878 households are subsistence and two households are
still subsistence. The specifications are shown below.

Result of Social Welfare and Development Indicator (SWDI) Baseline Assessment

August - October 2015
Tayug, Pangasinan

Result of SWDI Baseline Assessment

No. of HHs
INDICATORS Subsistenc Self-
assessed Survival
e Sufficient
I - Economic Sufficiency 1164 333 732 99
A. Employable Skills
Occupational skills of family members aged 18 years or over 1164 788 336 40
B. Employment
Working status of family members aged 18 years or over 1164 676 389 99
C. Income
Family monthly per capita income in the past six months 1164 328 301 535
D. Social Security
Membership or access of family to formal financial
1164 59 1082 23
institutions
II - SOCIAL ADEQUACY 1164 0 482 682
A. Health 1164 0 339 825
1. Health Condition and Availment of Health Services 1164 12 210 942
a. Availment of family members of accessible health
1164 39 103 1022
services in the past six months
b. Health condition of family members in the past six
1164 17 106 1041
months
2. Nutrition 1164 0 118 1046
a. Number of meals the family had in a day 1164 0 5 1159
b. Nutritional status of children aged 5 years or below
Total Assessed 1164 57 58 82
Households with 0-5 years old 197
Households without 0-5 years old 967
3. Water and Sanitation
a. Family's access to safe drinking water 1164 3 74 1087
b. Family's access to sanitary toilet facilities 1164 17 5 1142
c. Most common family practice garbage disposal 1164 815 51 298
B. Housing 1164 25 184 955
1a. Construction materials of the roof 1164 8 130 1026

Page 4 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

1b. Construction materials of the outer walls 1164 7 201 956

2. Tenure status of housing unit 1164 25 89 1050
3. Lighting facility of the house 1164 184 134 846
C. Education 1164 24 357 783
1. Functional literacy of family members aged 10 years or
1164 55 139 970
over
2. School enrolment/attendance of children aged 3-17 years
1164 94 214 856
in formal/informal school
D. Role Performance of Family 1164 7 241 916
1. Involvement of family members in family activities 1164 23 166 975
2. Ability of parents and/or guardians to discern problems in
1164 9 141 1014
family and arrive at solutions
3. Participation of family members in legitimate or widely-
recognized people's organizations/ associations or support 1164 1 23 1140
groups in the past six months
E. Family Awareness of Relevant Social Issues 1164 20 226 918
1. Awareness of the rights of children 1164 23 188 953
2. Awareness of gender-based violence 1164 14 213 937
3. Awareness of disaster risk reduction and management 1164 9 55 1100

The findings suggest that focus on Economic Sufficiency must be given priority especially that most
households belong to the survival and subsistence levels as shown in the table above. There are many beneficiaries with
no employable skills, no job, no income and no social security. Under Social Adequacy, proper garbage disposal must
also be mainstreamed because mostly belonged to subsistence.

II. Introduction

MUNICIPAL SOCIO ECONOMIC PROFILE

HISTORY

The town of Tayug is the smallest town in eastern Panagsinan in point of area. It has a total land area
of 51.3 square kilometers, the greater part being rice fields and residential lots. It is located on a flat terrain
and nestled at the foot of the Caraballo Mountains. Its boundaries are: on the south, Sta. Matia; on the east,
Natividad; on the southeast, San Quintin; on the southwest, Asingan; and on the northwest, San Manuel.
Located 80 kilometers away from Lingayen, the Pangasinan’s provincial capital, Tayug has one of the
tributaries in southern Pangasinan, where the Agno River system passes.

Tayug derived its name from a tree. It is said that long ago, a very tall tree grew right on the axis of
the town site. It was a “bacayao” which grew to approximately 50 meters. Because of its unusual height, the
tree was called “layug” menaing tall in the Ilocano dialect. By long usage, the town’s name came to be
known as Tayug. Historically, the town was established on February 4, 1873, as a municipality of Nueva
Ecija province. Its first gobernadorcillo was Don LorenzoBernardo. In 1873, the town was ceded to the
province of Pangasinan. In 1851, however, it was incorporated anew to its original province but in 1864,
Tayug was given back to Pangasinan. Before 1785, the old settlement of Tayug was under the Augustinians.
Later, they abandoned it for unknown reason.

On October 31, 1817, the Dominicans took over with Father Mathias Pelaez as their first parish
priest. On March 17, 1817, Fray Escobar officiated over the town’s foirst religious festival. The patron saint
from its foundation was St. Patrick of Ireland. Don Lorenzo Vernardo was Tayug’s teniente absolute form
May 10, 1917 to 1819 and under his administration, the church of Tayug was established. In 1870, adter 53

Page 5 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

years, the church of Tayug, by forced labor, was completed together with its convent. It is believed that the
early settlers of the town came from the neighboring province of Ilocos and Caraballo mountains. Around the
18th century, the town was converted into as agricultural community as the settlers were mostly farmers. Gold
panning was added to the rapid rise of Tayug.

During the Second World War, Tayug became the retreat route of Philippine Forces on their way to
Bataan. Twice it was made the capital of the province. From December 12-26, 1941, Lingayen, the seat of
Pangasinan’s capital, was transferred to Tayug. During the liberation in 1945, Tayug was again made the
Pangasinan’s capital as the Battle of Lingayen went on between the returning Americans and the Japanese.
Earlier, the Japanese garrison for eastern Pangasinan was located in Tayug where many Filipino guerillas
were detained, imprisoned, and executed. In 1931, Tayug’s town plaza and aprk were adjudged the most
beautiful in the entire Pangasinan. Five years later, Tayug was the first to stage a carnival and exposition in
Pangasinan. On January 19, 1931, the town attracted international recognition when a band of rebels which
were then called “colorum” and led by Pedro Calusa seized, destroyed, and burned the town as they took film
was produced based on this incident entitled, “Tayug, Ang Bayang Api.”

Today, Tayug has the distinction of being the education center of eastern Pangasinan. It has one
College, one University and seven High Schools. It is also the acknowledged commercial center of the
neighboring towns of Natividad, San Nicolas, San Quintin, Sta. Maria and Umingan. Thus, Tayug is already
considered an urban center or a melting pot, although still of a “minor” classification. With agriculture as its
chief industry, it produces corn, root crops, and vegetables, making the town a successful agricultural
community capable of producing rice on a commercial scale. Tourist attractions are the Catholic church,
Allied Botanical Corporation (the country’s pride for being the only 100% Filipino-owned seed company to
have its own research and breeding facility ABC’s Research Station in Tayug), the newly landscaped town
plaza and various resorts.

PEDRO CALUSA AND THE BATTLE OF TAYUG

Pedro Calusa, the returning traveler, had been molded by some of the same influences that shaped
Pedro Kabola. Both men were Ilocanos. Pedro Calusa was born near the turn of the century in Bauang, La
Union. He participated in the gathering migration from the Ilocos Region for early in the American period,
his family had moved to Tayug, Pangasinan. Liked Pedro Kabola, he was influenced by the diminishing
shadows of Guardia de Honor (Guardia de Honor de Mario Guardians de Honor de Nuestra Senora del
Rosario) and Santa Iglesia. Only in those, however, that they share their biographical identities.

Unlike Kabola, Calusa grew to manhood under cosmopolitan circumstances. Orphaned by cholera,
he left Philippines for Hawaii duing the second decade of American rule. For roughly the next ten years, he
worked in HAwai’s sugar and pineapple fields where backbreaking drudgery put the finishing touches to his
rebellious personality. In 1962, he forged Filipino contract workers into an agricultural union and attempted
to foment strikes for better wages and working conditions. When the effort failed, Calusa wound up behind
bars. Labeled as dangerous agitator, he was released after serving time in the territorial prison and was
deported to his homeland. The rebellious component of Calusa’s character consequently added up to much
more than that of the sum of Kabola’s intransigent parts. His rebellious activities reflected that complexity.
At the first opportunity, Calusa left Manila’s hostile environs and returned to eastern Pangasinan but the
oppressive social atmosphere of the province depressed him even more than its primitive economy. Within
six months he got himself into trouble, both voluntarily and involuntarily. There were seditious schemes and
so the Philippine Constabulary kept Calusa under surveillance. Try as they might, the men in red and khaki (a
popular name for the PC before) could not gather enough hard evidence to jail the ex-convict. One of these
was a plan to attack the Municipio of Rizal, Nueva Ecija. Harassed by the police but applauded secretly by
peasant rebels, Calusa sppn realized he was a marked man. In 1931, he accepted the fact that he was meant to
become a revolutionary so he started an underground society called the PNA (Philippine National
Association).

Page 6 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

Membership in this religious organization did not come easy though. Surrounded by informers and
PC agents, Calusa insisted that aides should screen potential members very well before inviting them into the
association. Once inducted, the “proselytes” were required to maintain absolute secrecy. Calusa held up his
end of the bargain by prohibiting anything resembling mass meetings. Communication was usually restricted
to face-to-face encounters. Detailed instructions were dispensed through small congregations in remote
backwood churches. The technique worked. By middle 1931, more than a thousand peasants in Pangasinan
and Nueva Ecija had been initiated into the PNA while both the municipal and military authorities remained
unaware of the organization. Calusa’s accomplishment, however, created problems. His followers,
particularly a handful of vindicative former kapisananes, pressed him to implement Kabola’s strategy. Aware
of the impracticalities of the masterplan, Calusa urged patience. His officers listened but they did not hear.
There arose differing opinions among the leaders depending on their experiences. Calusa was the only PNA
directory who had seen America’s Pacific fleet at Pearl Harbor. He was also the only one who witnessed
dedicated men crumble under overwhelming odds. His “provinciano” associates failed to grasp either reality
because they have not been abroad. To them, American military power and the Philippine Constabulary were
the same in strength. Moreover, they believed that the masses all over the Philippines were eager to strike
down their oppressors. Naiveté and frustration led them to advocate violence. They would never learn what
happened to the previous organizations like the KAPISANAN and the SANTA IGLESIA. Warmed finally
that the pNA would start its insurrection with or without him, Pedro Calusa endorsed the plan although he
knew it was doomed to fail. He undoubtedly hoped to influence the venture towards partial success. He was
surrounded by hotheads who were eager to lock horns with the establishment’s military might. It was Don
Quixote of La Mancha ready to fight the windmills all over again.

Other milestones in the

history of Tayug
1700, Middle part of The place was made under the control of Augustinians.
1785
1785 The Augustinians abandoned the place
1817-1819 March 10 Don Lorenzo Bernardo, teniente absolute, organized and founded the town
of Tayug.
1817, October 31 Dominicans settled down permanently in Tayug with Rverend Father
Mathias Pelaez as the first parish priest.
1800, Early part Some MAcabebes of Pampanga set p their communities, isolated
themselves and refused to inter-,ingle with the other people socially and
economically. The municipal executive ordered the flogging of these
MAcabebes.
1870, march 17 The massive walls of the church and convent, whose shadows you see, were
completed by forced labor.
1876, April 14 Tangkad, (Tagalog word for “tall”), a bandit leader from San Mateo Rizal
marched his men into Tayug, pillaged the houses and residents and left the
town to ashes just to avenge the beating of the Macabebes earlier.
1880 Don Andres Villar started the present layout of the municipal streets.
1896, October 3 Insurgent under Col. Villacorta, staged an unsuccessful recolt in Tayug.
Fray Garcia escaped by lowering himself from the convent by means of tied
“panuelos”.
1897, March Seventeen men of Barrio Legaspi were arrested and executed for having
been reported by a woman in her confession to the priest of San Miguel that
they were Katipuneros.

Page 7 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

1897, August Ten of Tayug’s educated young men were arrested for masonry and
filibusterism. They were brought to Lingayen, tried, and four of them
sentenced to deportation to Guam and Balacbac Island.
1899, November 11 Arrival in Tayug of the first American Army Force under General Lawton.
The Filipino flag of the revolution is said to have been lost here during
these days.
1931, January 10 The Kolorum Outbreak in Tayug, Pedro Calusa with his fanatical men
attacked and burned the barracks o fthe men in red and khaki (a popular
name for the PC before) inclusing several houses. PC Commanding Officer
Lt. Batchine and Junior Officer, Lt. San Pedro, were killed. Kolorums held
the town for 12 hours until PC re-enforcements assaulted their garrison at
the convent to subdue Calusa and his men.
1941, December 12 to 26 The provincial capital of Pangasinan was transferred to Atyug from
Lingayen for Safety.
1941, April 14 A handful of Filipino guerillas under Lt. Antiporda attacked the Japanese
garrison where the Japanese were overpowered. This was one of the earliest
guerilla warfare against the Japanese during World War II
1942, May 3 Japanese soldiers from Binalonan came to Tayug to subjugate the guerilla
occupants. Outnumbered, the guerillas fled, and residents were maltreated
or executed, followed with the burning of numerous houses and buildings.
1942, May 11 Japanese re-capture and re-occupied Tayug. Guerilla suspects were arrested
and executed including an American.
1945, Februarty 1 25th Division of the American forces liberated atyug and a military
government was set up.
1945, February 20 Re-establishment of American civil government in Tayug.

GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION
The municipality of Tayug lies in the eastern part of Pangasinan. It is located within the geographic
coordinates of 15° 56’ 0” to 16” 4’ 0” north latitude and 120° 42’ 0” to 120° 47’ 0” east latitude. The
Municipality is bounded by the following:

North : Municipality of San Nicolas

South : Municipality of Sta. Maria de Pila
East : Municipality of Natividad
Southeast : Municipality of San Quintin
Southwest : Municipality of Asingan
Northwest : Municipality of San Manuel
Distance from Lingayen:
Via Urdaneta, Asingan, Tayug 65.30 km.
Via Urdaneta, Rosales, Sta. Maria 79.70 km.

All the municipalities are about 196.39 kilometers away from Manila.

LAND AREA
Based on the Cadastral Stategy and updated Tax Mapping of Tayug as submitted by the Assessor’s
Office, the total land area of the municipality is 5,123.62 hectares or about 0.95% of the land area of the
province. About 65.64% of which is agricultural land scattered all over the municipality. The rest are
residential, commercial and industrial land. It has twenty-one (21) barangays including the four (4)

Page 8 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

Poblacions. The municipality is predominantly rural, about 16.89% of its total population is in the urban area.
On the other hand, about 83.11% is in the rural area.

The Municipality of Tayug is a THIRD class Municipality of Sixth District in the Province of
Pangasinan based on the 2010 National Statistic Census Board.

TOPOGRAPHY
The general terrain of the Municipality of Tayug is featureless and monotonously flat and level with
the slope varying from 0% to 3% slope. This is within slope category “A” that is useful for paddy rice
culture.

DRAINAGE AND SURFACE WATER

Two major bodies of water that transverse the municipality – the Agno River on the western part and
the Viray-Depalo River (Flood Control) on the eastern part. Major flood basin is located in Barangay
Libertad, Barangay Magallanes and in Barangay Trenchera.

GENERAL CLIMATE
1.1 CLIMATE

The Municipality if Tayug is under Type 1 climate (coronas’ scheme) which is characterized by two
(2) pronounced season – dry season from November to April and wet season from May to September.
Maximum rain period is from June to September.

1.2 ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE

The average monthly temperature synoptic station ranges from 25.9 °C in January to 28.9° in June.
The annual mean temperature is 27.9°C, which is moderately hot. January and February are the coldest
months with a lowest minimum temperature ranging 20.9 °C. The hottest month is April with maximum
temperatures reaching 35.1°C.

1.3 RELATIVE HUMIDITY

The cool month of August have a high relative humidity of 87 °C while the warm months of March
and April have a low relative humidity of 74 °C. The annual mean relative humidity is 80°C.

1.4 CLOUDNESS

The mean annual cloudness is about 5 oktas. An okta is the amount of cloud present in the sky,
expressed in oktas of the sky cover. (Okta is the fraction used in denoting cloud amount and is equal to 1/8 of
the whole sky)

1.5 RAINFALL

The annual rainfall reaches 2,391.7 in the type 1 climatic zone. August is the rainiest month with an
average of 23 rainy days.

1.6 PREVAILING WING DIRECTION

Page 9 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

In the months of January and April, the prevailing wind direction is at 90 percent towards the
northeast and 10 percent towards the west. In the month of February, March and May, it is observed at 90
percent towards northeast and 10 percent towards west. During the month of June and July, prevailing wind
direction is at 65 percent northeast and 35 percent towards west. While during the months of August,
September, October wind direction is at 60 percent northeast and 40 percent west on December, wind
direction is at 75 percent northeast and 25 percent west.

Soil Type
The Municipality of Tayug has only one (1) type of soil, the San Manuel Sandy Loam, as rated by
the BSWM. This type of soil consists of brown to light grayish-brown sandy loam surface soil ranging in
depth from 30 to 35 centimeters. The subsoil is loam to silt loam, grayish brown to brown, somewhat gritty
owing to the sandy texture. Its depth is varies from 50 to 70 centimeters. Below this zone is light reddish-
brown fine sand. Considered as one of the most productive soils, it has sufficient moisture content throughout
the year. Consequently, it is capable of being cultivated even during the dry season. Rice is the principal
crop, with corn, monggo and cowpea in rotation.

BARANGAY ORGANIZATION

The Municipality of Tayug is politically divided into twenty-one (21) barangays. Four (4) of which is
located in POblacion and wee categorized as Poblacion A, POblacion B, POblacion C, and POblacion D, The
other (17) Barangays are Agno, Amistad, Barangobong, C. Lichauco, Carriedo, Evangelista, Guzon, Lawak,
Legaspi, Libertad, Magallanes, Panganiban, Saleng, Santo Domingo, Toketec, Trenchera and Zamora. Each
barangay has its respective Sanguniang Barangay Officials which is composed of the Punong Barangay as
the presiding officer and the seven (7) regular Sanguniang Barangay members who are elected at large. The
Barangay Treasurer and the Barangay Secretary, for their part, are appointed by the Punong Barangay with
the concurrence of the Sanguniang Barangay members.

The Sanguniang Barangay is the policy-making body in the barangay endowed with duties and
responsibilities to promote the general welfare of the barangay residents. The twenty-one (21) barangays
represented by their respective Punong Barangay organized into one organization known as the “LIGA NG
MGA BARANGAY” and the elected president represents them in the Sanguniang Bayan. Assisting the
Barangay Council are the different barangay civic organizations which were organized with the assistance of
MLGOO of the Department of Interior and Local Government.

THE FOUNDING

Tayug was organized as a township under the province of Nueva Ecija on February 4, 1817.
However, it was only a month later or on March 10, 1817 to be exact, when Tayug was established as a full-
pledged municipalitywith Don Lorenzo Bernardoas the duly constituted civil authority who later became
“gobernadorcillo” or the town’s chief executive.

On March 17, 1817, one week after it was formally established as a town, Tayug celebrated its first
town fiesta, a religious festival honoring St. Patrick of Ireland, the town’s patron saint. The celebration,
which was officiated by Fray Escobar, became an annual tradition to this day.

In 1837, during the incumbency of town executive Don Leocadio Gamboa, Tayug, together with the
town of San Nicolas, was segregated from Nueva Ecija and put under the jurisdiction of the province of
Pangasinan. But again, in 1851, Tayug was returned as a township of Nueva Ecija. Not until the year 1864,
during the term of Don Eugenio Vinluan did Tayug finally became a part of Pangasinan.

Meaning of Municipal Seal

Page 10 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

TORCH
Stands for EDUCATION. Tayug is the educated
Center of Eastern Pangasinan.

MUNICIPAL HALL
The seat of the LOCAL GOVERNMENT, which
participates actively in maintaining, peace and order, and
political, social and economic stability, towards progress and
development with the help of other government agencies.

GEAR
Represents INDUSTRY, and the promising progressive income-generating ventures in the
municipality.

GREEN INSIDE THE GEAR

Represents AGRICULTURAL FARM LAND in the Municipality.

PHILIPPINE FLAG
Symbolized our COUNTRY, which the citizens of Tayug wholeheartedly support, cherish, protect
and defend from aggression.

Page 11 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

THE COLORS
COLOR SYMBOL
RED Stands for BRAVERY
BLUE Stands for PATRIOTISM
WHITE Stands for PURITY
GREEN Stands for HOPE, ABUNDANCE, and HAPPINESS
YELLOW Stands for LIFE, LIGHT, CHEERFULNESS, and PROGRESS

MISSION
To promote the general welfare of every Tayugenian in an
ecologically-balanced environment by transforming the
Municipality into a leading growth center in Pangasinan by the
year 2020.

VISION

By the year 2020, Tayug shall have been a leading center of

growth and development in Pangasinan in an ecologically-
balanced and safe environment by God-centered and self-reliant
Tayugenians under a competent, transparent and accountable local
leadership.

District 2

Page 12 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

Number of Barangays 21
Income Class 3rd
Population(year) 45,000
Poverty Incidence 27
Other pertinent information

PANTAWID PAMILYANG PILIPINO PROGRAM IN TAYUG,

PANGASINAN

Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program is a human development program of the national government
that invests in the health and education of poor households, particularly of children aged 0-18 years old.

Patterned after the conditional cash transfer scheme implemented in other developing countries, the
Pantawid Pamilya provides cash grants to beneficiaries provided that they comply with the set of conditions
required by the program.

Pantawid Pamilya has dual objectives:

Social Assistance- to provide cash assistance to the poor to alleviate thier immediate need (short term poverty
alleviation); and

Social Development - to break the intergenerational poverty cycle through investments in human capital.

Pantawid Pamilya helps to fulfill the country's commitment to meet the Millennium Development Goals,
namely:

1. Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

2. Achieve Universal Primary Education
3. Promote Gender Equality
4. Reduce Child Mortality
5. Improve Maternal Health

Targeting System

The poorest households in the municipalities are selected through the National Household
Targeting System for Poverty Reduction (NHTS-PR) implemented by the DSWD using the Proxy
Means Test. This test determines the socio-economic category of the families by looking at certain
proxy variables such as ownership of assets, type of housing, education of the household head,
livelihood of the family and access to water and sanitation facilities.

Eligible Households

Page 13 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

1. Households who are classified as poor based on the NHTS-PR at the time of assessment
2. Households that have children 0-18 years old and/ or have pregnant woman at the time of
assessment
3. Households that agree to meet conditions specified in the program

Sets of Responsibilities
To avail of the cash grants beneficiaries should comply with the following conditions:
1. Pregnant women must avail pre-and post-natal care and be attended during childbirth by a
trained health professional;
2. Parents must attend Family Development Sessions (FDS)
3. 0-5 Years old children must receive regular preventive health check-ups and vaccines;
4. 3-5year old children must attend day care or pre-school classes at least 85 % of the time
5. 6-18 year old children must enroll in elementary or high school and must attend at least 85%
of the time
6. 6-18 years old must receive de-worming pills twice a year.
7. General weighted average policy for high school students. They must garner a grade not
lower than 75% as their final grade.

RESULT OF THE INITIAL SWDI ANALYSIS AUGUST -OCTOBER 2015(1st Wave)

No. of
Self
Barangay Registered Survival % Subsistence % %
Sufficient
HHs
AGNO 85

AMISTAD 84

BARANGAY A
(POB.) 24

BARANGAY B
(POB.) 7

BARANGAY C
(POB.) 35

BARANGAY D
(POB.) 10

BARANGOBONG 94

C. LICHAUCO 35

CARRIEDO 41

Page 14 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

EVANGELISTA 47

GUZON 24

LAWAK 75

LEGASPI 99

LIBERTAD 82

MAGALLANES 71

PANGANIBAN 86

SALENG 28

SANTO 71
DOMINGO
TOKETEC 35

TRENCHERA 86

ZAMORA 31

Total 1,150

Summary:

Registered beneficiaries: No. of Assessed

- 1,164 Households - 1,164 Households

No. of Active Households No. of NQB's

- 1,150 Households - 14 Households

Page 15 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

III SWDI Results

 Economic Sufficiency
A component that defines levels of well-being thru sub variables namely employable skills, employment,
income and social security.

From August to first week of October 2015, Pantawid Pamilya staffs namely Joeffrey
Ryan L. Estolas, Danice Danica L. Cardenas, Maria Editha U. Manuel, Jemma Arevalo and
Marjorie Garcia surveyed the 21 barangays of Tayug Pangasinan to assess the levels of well-being
of their beneficiaries. The tiresome conduct earned them pertinent data necessary for proper
intervention, necessary action and right documentation. 1164 households were assessed with 30
households per day in the first week as a whole. For the latter weeks, municipal operations office
staffs were able assess 20 households individually. By November 2015, encoding started in the
municipals operations office by the trained beneficiary Biven Gilbert Paner. SWDI analysis was
handled by MOO staffs first week of June 2016.

EMPLOYABLE SKILLS

This indicator refers to the occupational skills of family members who are aged 18
years or over. Exempted from the coverage are those who are:

1. Currently in school even if they are working part-time; and

2. Persons with difficulty in doing or performing the most basic activities that occur on a
daily basis due to age or health condition, such as functional difficulty in seeing even if
wearing eyeglasses, in hearing even if using a hearing aid, in walking or climbing steps,
in remembering or concentrating, or in bathing or dressing.

Occupation refers to the kind/type of work a person does to earn a living. Thus, it is
important to have the necessary occupational skills duly recognized by appropriate
authorities or to have some work experience. This measures the potential of the family
members to earn, which may not be directly captured by the other indicators, e.g.
employment. This information could also be useful to DSWD in assisting the family to find
employment and thus increase its income.

Page 16 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

A.1 - Employable Skills Occupational skills of family members aged 18 years or over

Grand
SV  % SB  % SS %
BARANGAY Total
AGNO 29 29.59 63 64.28 6 6.11 98
AMISTAD 29 29.59 51 52.04 18 18.36 98
BARANGAY A
(POB.) 7 24.13 17 58.62 5 17.24 29
BARANGAY B
(POB.) 0 7 77.77 2 22.22 9
BARANGAY C
(POB.) 3 10.34 21 71.91 5 17.24 29
BARANGAY D
(POB.) 1 8.3 4 33.33 7 58.33 12
BARANGOBONG 18 18.18 57 57.57 24 24.24 99
C. LICHAUCO 5 14.70 21 61.76 8 23.52 34
CARRIEDO 12 25 30 62.5 6 12.5 48
EVANGELISTA 12 24.48 27 55.10 10 20.40 49
GUZON 7 35 10 50 3 15 20
LAWAK 19 23.75 49 61.25 12 15 80
LEGASPI 39 36.44 54 50.46 14 13.08 107
LIBERTAD 12 14.11 53 62.35 20 23.52 85
MAGALLANES 16 24.24 43 65.15 7 10.60 66
PANGANIBAN 34 39.08 46 52.87 7 08.04 87
SALENG 6 21.42 18 64.28 4 14.28 28
SANTO
DOMINGO 18 26.08 43 62.31 8 1.44 69
TOKETEC 15 31.91 21 44.68 11 23.40 47
TRENCHERA 34 36.55 54 58.06 5 5.37 93
ZAMORA 8 23.52 24 70.58 2 5.88 34
324 26.53 713 58.39 184 15.06 1,221

A.1 - Employable Skills Occupational skills of

family members aged 18 years or over

15.06%
25.53% SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

58.39%

Page 17 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

The table reveals that under Employable Skills/Occupational Skills of the family members aged 18 years or
over (except those who are in school) there are 788 or 67.70 % of the total 1,164 households under survival
level. The reasons as per survey are as follows:

 Most family members of the households have work experience of less than two
months.
 Most family members of the households did not finish secondary school.
 Most family members of the households prefer working within their community
where most jobs are short term.
There are 336 or 28.87% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There are family members of the households who possess

professional/technical/occupational skills but not duly recognized by appropriate
authorities like TESDA, CHED, PRC and LTO.
 There are family members of the households who have work experiences for at least
two months but less than six months mostly seasonal jobs like fishing, farming and
other agricultural works.
 There are family members of the households who enroll to skills trainings but do not
finish the course due to lack of interest and scarcity concerns.
There are 40 or 3.44% households under self-sufficient for the following reasons:

 Few members of the households have work experiences of at least six months and
over.
 Few members of the households possess professional/technical/occupational skills
duly recognized by appropriate authorities just like tricycle drivers with licenses.
As per table above, barangays Amistad, Legaspi and Agno have mostly survival households due to the
following instances:

 The above-mentioned barangays are far from the town proper especially the puroks
near barangay Guzon and San Manuel, Pangasinan thus, interventions and/or skills
trainings for them conducted within the town vicinity are out of reach. They still
need to spend for transportation which is burdensome for them.
 The distance also isolates most of the household members from opportunities outside
their domain and encourages them to dwell in short term employments found therein
like seasonal carpentry, laundry works for women and other helping jobs in line to
agriculture.
Barangays Barangobong, Magallanes and Trenchera are in subsistence level because of the following:

 Most members of the households therein have work experiences for at least two
months but less than six months.
 Most household members engage in farming, fishing and other seasonal jobs.
Barangay Barangobong has the highest self-sufficient members of households from the 21 barangays because
there are many job opportunities available therein like gold panning, hollow block making, vegetable farming
and quarrying.
Through the efforts of MOO Tayug and LGU, they agreed to conduct skills training in the barangay just like
what happened in the recently concluded cookery and in as much, they plan to hold job fair barangay based

Page 18 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

in the future and caravans for that matter. Sustainable Livelihood program committed 229 households this
year.

A.2 – Employment/Job

This indicator refers to the working status of family members who are aged 18 years
old or over. Exempted from the coverage are those who are:

1. Head of the household employed or with regular/permanent job

2. Persons with difficulty in doing or performing the most basic activities that occur on a
daily basis due to age or health condition, such as functional difficulty in seeing even if
wearing eyeglasses, in hearing even if using a hearing aid, in walking or climbing steps,
in remembering or concentrating, or in bathing or dressing.

Work refers to any activity that a person does during the reference period, for
pay in cash or in kind, in any establishment, office, farm, private home, or for profit or
without pay on a family farm or enterprise.
It also includes:

a) what a farm operator or member of the operator's family does on the farm operated by
another household on exchange labor arrangement; and

b) any activity that a person does in relation to minor activities in home gardening, raising
of crops, fruits, hogs, poultry, etc., fishing for home consumption and manufacturing for
own use.

Work for pay – if a person works for an employer, whether in an establishment,

office, farm or private residence (other than his own) and receives salary/wage, commission,
tips, in cash or in kind, or other forms of compensation such as free meals, and/or free living
quarters, support in school, etc.

Work for profit – if a self-employed person works for profit in own business such
as sari-sari store, farm, dress shop or for fees in the practice of one’s profession or trade.
Making a single article for sale is considered work for profit.

Work without pay on family farm or enterprise - if a person works without pay on
a farm or enterprise that is being operated by another family member in the same household.

Work by farm operator/family member on another farm on exchange labor- if a

farm operator or a member of his family works on a farm being operated by another
household on exchange labor arrangements. This is usually practiced by agricultural workers
during the height of rice planting and harvesting seasons.
In the case of home gardening, raising of crops, fruits and nuts, hogs, poultry, and gathering
of wild fruits and vegetables;, there must be some harvest or animals disposed of (sold,
consumed, bartered, or given away), or in fishing, there must be some catch in order that
these activities will be considered work.
A worker may be considered with permanent job if there is an expectation of
continuing employment or with no pre-determined termination date. Moreover, regular

Page 19 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

employees9 are those employees with stable contracts for whom the employing organization
is responsible for payment of taxes and social security contributions and/or where the
contractual relationship is subject to national labor legislation.
Working hours should be measured in FTE10 units. FTE per week is 40 hours.

Page 20 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

A.2 - Employment working status of family members aged 18 years or over

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 26 26.53 56 57.14 16 16.32 98
AMISTAD 25 25.51 47 47.95 26 26.53 98
BARANGAY A
(POB.) 7 24.13 15 51.72 7 24.1 29
BARANGAY B
(POB.) 0 0 4 44.44 5 55.55 9
BARANGAY C
(POB.) 3 10.34 16 55.17 10 34.48 29
BARANGAY D
(POB.) 1 8.3 4 33.33 7 58.33 12
BARANGOBONG 13 13.13 51 51.51 35 35.35 99
C. LICHAUCO 4 11.76 16 47.05 14 41.17 34
CARRIEDO 10 20.03 32 66.66 6 12.5 48
EVANGELISTA 11 22.44 24 48.97 14 20.57 49
GUZON 6 30 11 55 3 15 20
LAWAK 12 24.48 49 61.25 19 23.75 80
LEGASPI 33 30.84 56 52.33 18 16.82 107
LIBERTAD 12 14.11 49 57.64 24 28.23 85
MAGALLANES 12 18.18 3 53.03 19 28.78 66
PANGANIBAN 10 11.49 42 48.27 35 40.22 87
SALENG 6 21.42 17 60.71 5 14.85 28
SANTO
DOMINGO 6 8.69 30 43.47 33 47.82 69
TOKETEC 11 23.40 20 42.55 16 34.04 47
TRENCHERA 32 34.40 53 56.98 8 8.60 93
ZAMORA 3 8.82 11 32.35 20 58.82 34
Grand Total 243 19.90 638 52.25 340 27.54 1,221

A.2 - Employment working status of family

members aged 18 years or over

27.54%
19.90%
SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

52.25%

Page 21 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

The table reveals that under Employment of the family members aged 18 years or over (except those who are
in school) there are 677 or 58.16 % of the total 1,164 households under survival level. The reasons as per
survey are as follows:

 Most family members of the households have work experience of less than two
months and many have no work at all.
 Most family members of the households did not finish secondary school.
 Most family members of the households prefer working within their community
where most jobs are short term.
There are 389 or 33.42% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There are family members of the households who possess

professional/technical/occupational skills but not duly recognized by appropriate
authorities like TESDA, CHED, PRC and LTO.
 There are family members of the households who have work experiences for at least
two months but less than six months mostly seasonal jobs like fishing, farming and
other agricultural works.
 There are family members of the households who do not exert effort to find jobs with
security of tenure.
There are 98 or 8.42% households under self-sufficient for the following reasons:

 Few members of the households have work experiences of at least six months and
over.
 Few members of the households possess professional/technical/occupational skills
duly recognized by appropriate authorities just like tricycle drivers with licenses.
 Few members of the households have regular jobs.
As per table above, barangays Amistad, Legaspi and Agno have mostly survival households due to the
following instances:

 The above-mentioned barangays are far from the town proper especially the puroks
near barangay Guzon and San Manuel, Pangasinan thus, job fairs, interventions
and/or skills trainings for them conducted within the town vicinity are out of reach.
They still need to spend for transportation which is burdensome for them.
 The distance also isolates most of the household members from opportunities outside
their domain and encourages them to dwell in short term employments found therein
like seasonal carpentry, laundry works for women and other helping jobs in line to
agriculture.
Barangays Barangobong, Magallanes and Trenchera are in subsistence level because of the following:

 Most members of the households therein have work experiences for at least two
months but less than six months.
 Most household members engage in farming, fishing and other seasonal jobs.
Barangays Barangobong and Guzon has the highest self-sufficient members of households from the 21
barangays because there are many job opportunities available therein like gold panning, hollow block
making, vegetable farming and quarrying. These two barangays are adjacent to each other hence, they share
both opportunities.

Page 22 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

Through the efforts of MOO Tayug and LGU, they agreed to conduct skills training in the barangay just like
what happened in the recently concluded cookery and in as much, they plan to hold job fair barangay based
in the future and caravans for that matter. Sustainable Livelihood Program committed 229 households to
serve this year.

A.3 - Income.

Total family income includes primary income (earnings) and receipts from other
sources received during the reference period as participants in any economic activity (either
as labourer, proprietor, capitalist or entrepreneur), or as recipients of transfers, pensions,
grants, etc. by all family members except salaries and wages from family members aged
less than 10 years and those between 10 to 18 who are not in school.

Page 23 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

A.3 - Income Family monthly per capita in-come in the past six months
Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 20 20.40 21 21.42 57 58.16 98
AMISTAD 24 24.48 31 31.63 43 43.87 98
BARANGAY A
(POB.) 5 17.24 10 34.48 14 48.27 29
BARANGAY B
(POB.) 2 22.22 3 53.33 4 44.44 9
BARANGAY C
(POB.) 6 20.68 11 37.43 12 41.27 29
BARANGAY D
(POB.) 1 8.33 4 33.33 7 58.33 12
BARANGOBONG 45 45.45 25 25.25 29 29.24 99
C. LICHAUCO 16 47.05 13 38.23 5 14.70 34
CARRIEDO 17 35.41 10 20.83 21 43.75 48
EVANGELISTA 23 46.93 14 28.57 12 24.48 49
GUZON 6 30 7 35 7 35 20
LAWAK 16 20 21 26.25 43 53.75 80
LEGASPI 38 35.51 27 25.23 42 39.25 107
LIBERTAD 12 14.11 22 25.88 51 60 85
MAGALLANES 21 31.18 14 21.21 31 46.96 66
PANGANIBAN 31 35.63 22 25.28 34 39.08 87
SALENG 15 53.57 6 21.42 7 25 28
SANTO
DOMINGO 24 34.78 15 21.73 30 43.47 69
TOKETEC 16 34.04 9 19.14 22 46.50 47
TRENCHERA 30 32.25 23 24.73 40 43.01 93
ZAMORA 15 44.11 11 32.35 8 23.25 34
Grand Total 383 31.36 319 26.12 519 42.50 1,221

A.3 - Income Family monthly per capita in-come

in the past six months

31.36% SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
42.50%
SELF SUFFICIENT

26.12%

Page 24 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

The table reveals that under Income of the family members aged 18 years or over (except those who are in
school) there are 335 or 28.78 % of the total 1,164 households under survival level. The reasons as per
survey are as follows:

 There are members of the households who have work experience of less than two
months hence, they are below the official monthly per capita food threshold which is
1,092.
 There are members of the households who did not finish secondary school so
employment pursuit is almost impossible.
 There are members of the households prefer working within their community where
most jobs are short term.
There are 296 or 25.43% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There are family members of the households who possess

professional/technical/occupational skills but not duly recognized by appropriate
authorities like TESDA, CHED, PRC and LTO so they are paid less.
 There are family members of the households who have work experiences for at least
two months but less than six months mostly seasonal jobs like fishing, farming and
other agricultural works and their official monthly per capita food threshold is equal
to 1,092 but less than the official monthly per capita income that is 1,481.
 There are family members of the households who apply outside but do not finish the
contracts due to lack of interest, scarcity concerns and separation anxiety.
There are 533 or 45.79% households under self-sufficient for the following reasons:

 Most members of the households have work experiences of at least six months and
over so their official monthly per capita poverty threshold is above 1,481.
 Most members of the households possess professional/technical/occupational skills
duly recognized by appropriate authorities just like tricycle drivers with licenses.
 Most members have regular jobs.
As per table above, barangays Amistad, Legaspi and Agno have mostly survival households due to the
following instances:

 The above-mentioned barangays are far from the town proper especially the puroks
near barangay Guzon and San Manuel, Pangasinan thus, employment opportunities,
interventions and/or skills trainings for them conducted within the town vicinity are
out of reach. They still need to spend for transportation which is burdensome for
them.
 The distance also isolates most of the household members from opportunities outside
their domain and encourages them to dwell in short term employments found therein
like seasonal carpentry, laundry works for women and other helping jobs in line to
agriculture.
Barangays Amistad, Legaspi and Panganiban are in subsistence level because of the following:

 Most members of the households therein have work experiences for at least two
months but less than six months.
 Most household members engage in farming, fishing and other seasonal jobs.

Page 25 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

Barangays Barangobong, Trenchera and Libertad has the highest self-sufficient members of households from
the 21 barangays because there are many job opportunities available therein like gold panning, hollow block
making, vegetable farming and quarrying in Barangobong; wood/furniture jobs and poultry farms in Libertad
and Panganiban.
Through the efforts of MOO Tayug and LGU, they agreed to conduct skills training in the barangay just like
what happened in the recently concluded cookery and in as much, they plan to hold job fair barangay based
in the future and caravans for that matter. Sustainable Livelihood Program committed to serve 229
households this year.

A.4 – Social Security/Insurance.

This indicator looks into the family’s membership or access to formal financial
institutions, such as banks, pawnshops, lending investors, loan associations, credit card
companies, microfinance institutions, private insurance companies, cooperatives or
government social security agencies such as the GSIS and SSS. Such institutions offer
financial assistance to eligible applicants in times of need and therefore enhance the well-
being of families. Mutual aid schemes such as paluwagan, “5-6” lending money and similar
arrangements which are temporary in nature are not included.

Page 26 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

A.4 - Social Security and Access to Financial Institutions Membership or access of family to formal
financial institutions
Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
1.02
87 88.77 10 10.20 1
AGNO 98
5.10
87 88.77 6 6.12 5
AMISTAD 98
BARANGAY A 6.89
24 52.75 3 10.34 2
(POB.) 29
BARANGAY B 0
8 88.88 1 11.11 0
(POB.) 9
BARANGAY C 0
19 65.51 10 34.48 0
(POB.) 29
BARANGAY D 0
8 66.66 4 33.33 0
(POB.) 12
2.02
90 90.90 7 7.07 2
BARANGOBONG 99
2.94
29 85.29 4 11.76 1
C. LICHAUCO 34
6.25
36 75 9 18.75 3
CARRIEDO 48
6.122
39 79.59 7 14.28 3
EVANGELISTA 49
0
19 95 1 5 0
GUZON 20
5
71 88.75 5 6.25 4
LAWAK 80
9.34
81 75.70 16 14.95 10
LEGASPI 107
1.17
65 76.47 19 22.35 1
LIBERTAD 85
7.57
54 81.81 7 10.60 5
MAGALLANES 66
10.34
63 72.41 15 17.24 9
PANGANIBAN 87
7.14
20 71.42 6 21.42 2
SALENG 28
SANTO 8.69
58 84.05 5 7.24 6
DOMINGO 69
12.76
32 68.08 9 19.14 6
TOKETEC 47
9.67
77 82.79 7 7.52 9
TRENCHERA 93
5.80
24 70.58 8 23.52 2
ZAMORA 34
8.81
991 81.16 159 13.02 71
Grand Total 1,221

Page 27 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

A.4 - Social Security and Access to Financial

Institutions Membership or access of family
to formal
financial institutions

8.81% SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
13.02% SELF SUFFICIENT

81.16%

The table reveals that under Social Security of the family members there are 59 or 5.07 % of the total 1,164
households under survival level. The reasons as per survey are as follows:

 There are members who are not aware of the mutual aid Pantawid Pamilya Tayug
Saranay.
 There are members who don’t want to join the Asosasyon ng Pantawid Pamilya sa
Tayug.
 There are members who have access to loans and cooperatives.
There are 1082 or 92.96% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 Most households joined the Pantawid Pamilya Tayug Saranay, a mutual aid to help
families financially.
 Most households are members of Asosasyon ng Pantawid Pamilya sa Tayug.
There are 23 or 1.98% households under self-sufficient for the following reasons:

 Few are active SSS members for more than two years.
 Few have savings in banks and members of cooperatives.
As per table above, barangay Barangobong has mostly survival and self-sufficient households due to the
following instances:

 The members who are in survival are those who don’t believe in insurances as per
interview during SWDI administration.
 The members who are in self-sufficient are those with social insurances covered by
their employers.

Page 28 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

Barangays Amistad, Legaspi and Agno are in subsistence level because of the following:

 Most members of the households therein are members of Pantawid Pamilya Tayug
Saranay and Asosasyon ng Pantawid Pamilya sa Tayug.
 The above-mentioned barangays have the most numbers of Pantawid beneficiaries.
MOO Tayug introduced Dyna Wealth in their family development sessions, an insurance company that aids
in death and hospitalization financially. During FDS sessions too, importance of insurances and savings are
reiterated.

Page 29 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

Social Adequacy
Social adequacy is a major component that measure the level of well-being thru sub variables namely health,
housing, education, role performance of family and family awareness of relevant social issues.

 A. Health

1- Health conditions and availment of health services.

a. Availment by the family members during the reference period (past six
months) of accessible health services in the community

It aims to measure the health-seeking behavior of the family members. For

this indicator, all members of the Pantawid families whether direct recipients of
the grants or not, will be accounted for.

The behavior of the family in going to health units for treatment of illnesses
or for other health services is a factor that contributes to either the progression or
regression of health conditions. Promotion of good health is generally through
proper nutrition, an adequate and balanced diet, desirable food and nutrition
practices and healthy habits such as washing of hands and drinking safe water.
Healthy lifestyles also promote and protect health and well-being. All diseases
have elements of prevention. Some of these preventive measures12 are being
made available in the community through the health units, such as the following:

 General consultation;
 Health education;
 Family planning;
 Maternity care;
 Child care (e.g., immunization);
 Information on nutrition and food safety;
 Information/control on lifestyle-related or non-communicable
diseases;
 Information/control on environmental health and sanitation;
 Treatment for minor illness/accidents; and
 Basic oral health care.
 A.1- Health Condition and Availment of Health Services
 A.1a- Availment of family members of accessible health services in the past six months

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 0 0 1 1.02 97 98.97 98
AMISTAD 0 0 7 7.14 91 98.85 98
BARANGAY A
0 0 3 10.34 26 89.25
(POB.) 29
BARANGAY B
0 0 1 11.11 8 88.88
(POB.) 9
BARANGAY C
0 0 0 0 29 100
(POB.) 29

Page 30 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

BARANGAY D
0 0 1 8.33 11 91.66
(POB.) 12
BARANGOBONG 0 0 4 4.04 95 95.95 99
C. LICHAUCO 0 0 0 0 34 100 34
CARRIEDO 0 0 2 4.16 46 95.83 48
EVANGELISTA 0 0 2 4.08 47 95.91 49
GUZON 0 0 0 0 20 100 20
LAWAK 1 1.25 0 0 79 98.75 80
LEGASPI 0 0 15 14.01 92 85.98 107
LIBERTAD 0 0 10 11.76 75 88.23 85
MAGALLANES 0 0 1 1.51 65 98.48 66
PANGANIBAN 0 0 0 0 87 100 87
SALENG 0 0 1 3.57 27 96.42 28
SANTO
0 0 4 5.79 65 94.20
DOMINGO 69
TOKETEC 1 2.12 1 2.12 45 95.74 47
TRENCHERA 0 0 6 6.45 87 93.54 93
ZAMORA 0 0 0 0 34 100 34
Grand Total 2 0.16 59 4.83 1,160 87.80 1,221

A.1- Health Condition and Availment of Health Services

A.1a- Availment of family members of accessible health
services in the past six months
0.16%
4.83%

SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

87.80%

The table reveals that under Health Condition and Availment of Health Services (Availment of the family
members of accessible health services in the past six months) there are 39 or 3.35 % of the total 1,164
households under survival level. The reasons as per survey are as follows:

 Few members still believe in faith healers.

 Few members follow the used to practices of their elders.
 Few members still fear or still are not used to modern medicine.
There are 103 or 8.85% households under subsistence level because of the following:

Page 31 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

 There are those who avail health services once or twice in the past six months.
 There are those who believed that in Eastern Pangasinan District Hospital, poor
health care deliveries are rampant.
There are 1022 or 87.80% households under self-sufficient for the following reasons:

 Mostly visit their health centers monthly especially children five and below and
whenever they feel sick.
 Many believe in health education and health advocacies.
As per table above, barangays Lawak, Zamora and C. Lichauco have survival households due to the
following instances:

 The members who are in survival are those who don’t believe in modern medicines
and still consult their faith healers.
 The above-mentioned barangays are far from the Rural Health Unit.
Barangays Magallanes, Panganiban and Barangobong are in subsistence level because of the following:

 There are still those who are ambiguous with modern medicines.
 There are those who don’t go back for their return checkups especially when they
already feel healthy after the first or second consultation.
Barangays Agno, Poblacion B, Poblacion C, Poblacion D, Evangelista and Toketec have the highest self-
sufficient members of households from the 21 barangays because they trust and believe in health education
and the modern medicine.
MOO Tayug strengthens awareness of health and its importance in their family development session
conducts and with the LGU, health drives and advocacies are materialized.

Household members are generally healthy during the year.

The health condition of family members is the main consideration of this

indicator. This looks at whether there had been major illnesses in the family during
the reference period

Page 32 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

A.1b- Health condition of family members in the past six months

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 1 1.02 4 4.08 93 94.89 98
AMISTAD 1 1.02 6 6.12 91 92.25 98
BARANGAY A
(POB.) 0 0 0 0 29 100 29
BARANGAY B
(POB.) 0 0 0 0 9 100 9
BARANGAY C
(POB.) 0 0 0 0 29 100 29
BARANGAY D
(POB.) 0 0 0 0 12 100 12
BARANGOBONG 0 0 2 2.02 97 97.87 99
C. LICHAUCO 0 0 1 2.94 33 97.05 34
CARRIEDO 0 0 0 0 48 100 48
EVANGELISTA 1 2.04 4 8.16 44 89.79 49
GUZON 0 0 0 0 20 100 20
LAWAK 1 1.25 3 3.75 74 95 80
LEGASPI 2 1.86 8 7.47 97 90.65 107
LIBERTAD 0 0 2 2.35 83 97.64 85
MAGALLANES 1 1.51 4 6.06 61 92.42 66
PANGANIBAN 2 2.29 4 4.59 81 93.10 87
SALENG 1 3.57 6 21.42 21 75 28
SANTO
DOMINGO 0 0 2 2.89 67 97.10 69
TOKETEC 0 0 4 8.51 43 91.48 47
TRENCHERA 2 2.15 11 11.82 80 86.02 93
ZAMORA 1 2.94 5 14.70 28 82.35 34
Grand Total 13 1.06 66 5.40 1,142 93.52 1,221

A.1b- Health condition of family members in

the past six months
1.06%
5.40%

SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

93.52%

Page 33 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

The table reveals that under Health Condition and Availment of Health Services (Health condition of family
members in the past six months) there are 17 or 1.46 % of the total 1,164 households under survival level.
The reasons as per survey are as follows:

 Few members still believe in faith healers.

 Few members follow the used to practices of their elders.
 Few members who still fear/not used to modern medicine.
 Few members got sick and were confined to the hospital.
There are 103 or 8.85% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There are those who avail health services once or twice in the past six months.
 There are those who believed that in Eastern Pangasinan District Hospital, poor
health care deliveries are rampant.
 Some members got sick but were managed at home.
There are 1022 or 87.80% households under self-sufficient for the following reasons:

 Mostly visit their health centers monthly especially children five and below and
whenever they feel sick.
 Many believe in health education and health advocacies.
 Nobody got sick in the last six months.
As per table above, barangays Barangobong, Magallanes, Santo Domingo, Trenchera and Toketec have
survival households due to the following instances:

 The members who are in survival are those who don’t believe in modern medicines
and still consult their faith healers.
 Few of the members got sick that needs hospitalization.
Barangays Zamora, Trenchera, Panganiban and Poblacion A are in subsistence level because of the
following:

 There are those who got sick but were managed at home.
 There are still those who are ambiguous with modern medicines.
 There are those who don’t go back for their return checkups especially when they
already feel healthy after the first or second consultation.
Barangays Poblacion D, Agno, Amistad, Barangobong and Legaspi have the highest self-sufficient members
of households from the 21 barangays because they trust and believe in health education and the modern
medicine so nobody got sick among the members of their households for the past six months.
MOO Tayug strengthens awareness of health and its importance in their family development session
conducts and with the LGU, health drives and advocacies are materialized.

Page 34 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

The table reveals the total under Health (of the sub variables Availment of health services in the past six
months and health condition of family members in the past six months) there are 12 or 1.03 % of the total
1,164 households under survival level. The reasons as per survey are as follows:

 Few members still believe in faith healers.

 Few members follow the used to practices of their elders.
 Few members who still fear/not used to modern medicine.
 Few members got sick and were confined to the hospital.
There are 210 or 18.04% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There are those who avail health services once or twice in the past six months.
 There are those who believed that in Eastern Pangasinan District Hospital, poor
health care deliveries are rampant.
 Some members got sick but were managed at home.
There are 942 or 80.93% households under self-sufficient for the following reasons:

 Mostly visit their health centers monthly especially children five and below and
whenever they feel sick.
 Many believe in health education and health advocacies.
 Nobody got sick in the last six months.
As per table above, barangays Barangobong, Magallanes, Santo Domingo, Trenchera and Zamora have
survival households due to the following instances:

 The members who are in survival are those who don’t believe in modern medicines
and still consult their faith healers.
 Few of the members got sick that needs hospitalization.
Barangays Lawak, Magallanes and Panganiban are in subsistence level because of the following:

 There are those who got sick but were managed at home.
 There are still those who are ambiguous with modern medicines.
 There are those who don’t go back for their return checkups especially when they
already feel healthy after the first or second consultation.
Barangays Poblacion D, Agno, Amistad and Legaspi have the highest self-sufficient members of households
from the 21 barangays because they trust and believe in health education and the modern medicine so nobody
got sick among the members of their households for the past six months.
MOO Tayug strengthens awareness of health and its importance during family development sessions and
with the LGU, health drives and advocacies are materialized.

2. NUTRITION

a. The number of meals the family had in a day

Page 35 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

The number of meals the family had in a day serves as an important indicator in
determining the nutritional status of the family members. According to the Food and
Nutrition Research Institute (FNRI), missing meals slows down the metabolism and stores
more fat. Without the continuous energy that food supplies, one becomes run down and
more susceptible to sickness

A.2a- Number of meals the family had in a day

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 0 0.00 0 0.00 98 100 98
AMISTAD 0 0.00 0 0.00 98 100 98
BARANGAY A (POB.) 0 0.00 0 0.00 29 100 29
BARANGAY B (POB.) 0 0.00 0 0.00 9 100 9
BARANGAY C (POB.) 0 0.00 0 0.00 29 100 29
BARANGAY D (POB.) 0 0.00 0 0.00 12 100 12
BARANGOBONG 1 1.01 6 6.06 92 92.92 99
C. LICHAUCO 0 0.00 5 14.70 29 85.29 34
CARRIEDO 0 0.00 0 0.00 48 100 48
EVANGELISTA 0 0.00 0 0.00 49 100 49
GUZON 0 0.00 0 0.00 20 100 20
LAWAK 0 0.00 1 1.25 79 98.75 80
LEGASPI 0 0.00 1 0.93 106 99.06 107
LIBERTAD 0 0.00 0 0.00 85 100 85
MAGALLANES 0 0.00 1 1.51 65 98.48 66
PANGANIBAN 0 0.00 0 0.00 87 100 87
SALENG 0 0.00 0 0.00 28 100 28
SANTO DOMINGO 0 0.00 2 2.09 67 97.10 69
TOKETEC 0 0.00 2 4.25 45 95.74 47
TRENCHERA 1 1.07 1 1.07 91 97.84 93
ZAMORA 0 0.00 0 0.00 340 100 34
Grand Total 2 0.16 19 1.55 1,200 98.28 1,221

Number of meals the family in a day

0.16%
1.55%

SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

98.28%

Page 36 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

The table reveals that under Health and Nutrition (Number of meals the family had in a day) there are no or
0% of the total 1,164 households under survival level. The reasons as per survey are as follows:

 Most member value eating three times a day not to mention the snacks as integral in
their health aspects with priority to nutritious foods like fruits and vegetables.
 Most members are knowledgeable of a well-balanced diet.
There are 5 or 0.43% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There are few who eats twice a day due to scarcity.

 There are few who chose instant foods like noodles, canned goods and frozen foods
because they are cheaper.
There are 1159 or 99.57% households under self-sufficient for the following reasons:

 Most member value eating three times a day not to mention the snacks as integral in
their health aspects with priority to nutritious foods like fruits and vegetables.
 Most members are knowledgeable of a well-balanced diet.
As per table above, no barangays have survival households due to the following instances:

 Most member value eating three times a day not to mention the snacks as integral in
their health aspects with priority to nutritious foods like fruits and vegetables.
 Most members are knowledgeable of a well-balanced diet.
Barangays Panganiban, Magallanes, Saleng and Sto. Domingo are in subsistence level because of the
following:

 There are few who eats twice a day due to scarcity.

 There are few who chose instant foods like noodles, canned goods and frozen foods
because they are cheaper.
Almost all barangays have the highest self-sufficient members of households 100% because of the following
reasons:

 Most member value eating three times a day not to mention the snacks as integral in
their health aspects with priority to nutritious foods like fruits and vegetables.
 Most members are knowledgeable of a well-balanced diet.

MOO Tayug strengthens awareness of health, nutrition and its importance during family development
sessions and with the LGU, health and nutrition drives and advocacies are materialized.

Nutritional status of children aged 5 years old or below.

The New WHO Child Growth Standards for Use of Children 0-5 Years Old was
adopted by the National Nutrition Council Board under Resolution 2, Series of 2008. This
covers, among others, weight-for-age, height-for-age and body mass index-for -age and
other factors leading to under- or over-nutrition. Information on the nutritional status of
children may not be readily available to the parents and should be sourced from the rural
health units/barangay centers. For purposes of the SWDI, the weight-for-age standards will
be used.

Page 37 of 91
 Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

A.2b- Nutritional status of children aged 5 years or below

NO 0- Grand
BARANGAY % SV % SB % SS %
5 Total
AGNO 1 2.30 8 19.04 33 78.57 98
AMISTAD 0 0 1 16.66 5 83.23 98
BARANGAY A
2 12.5 6 37.5 8 50
(POB.) 29
BARANGAY B
5 17.85 6 21.42 17 60.71
(POB.) 9
BARANGAY C
0 0 4 22.22 14 77.77
(POB.) 29
BARANGAY D
2 12.5 5 31.25 9 56.25
(POB.) 12
BARANGOBONG 1 3.22 4 12.90 26 83.87 99
C. LICHAUCO 7 14.89 3 6.38 37 78.72 34
CARRIEDO 4 28.57 3 21.42 7 50 48
EVANGELISTA 3 6.97 5 11.62 35 81.39 49
GUZON 1 2.43 2 4.87 38 92.68 20
LAWAK 1 7.14 3 21.42 10 71.42 80
LEGASPI 4 36.26 2 18.18 5 45.45 107
LIBERTAD 1 50 0 0 1 50 85
MAGALLANES 4 13.33 4 13.33 22 73.33 66
PANGANIBAN 2 4.76 6 14.28 34 80.95 87
SALENG 0 0 0 0 15 100 28
SANTO
0 0 1 3.84 25 96.15
DOMINGO 69
TOKETEC 1 14.28 2 28.57 4 57.14 47
TRENCHERA 2 14.28 2 14.28 10 91.42 93
ZAMORA 0 0 0 0 13 100 34
Grand Total 83.08 41 8.61 57 14.07 368 77.31 1,221

Children 5 years and below

7%
5%
5%
NO 0-5 y/o
SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

83%

As per table above, there are 967 or 83.08% households with no children aged 0-5 and only 197 households
have. We take 197 as our basis in assessing their levels of well-being.

Page 38 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

The table reveals that under Health and Nutrition (Nutritional status of family members aged 0-5) there are
57 or 28.93% out of 197 households under survival level. The reasons as per survey are as follows:

 There are few whose children are severely underweight due to knowledge deficit.
 There are few who can’t afford to buy milk for their children.
 There are few who don’t practice their children to eat on nutritious foods like fruits
and vegetables but allows them to eat junk foods.
There are 58 or 29.44% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There are few whose children are underweight and overweight.

 There are few who don’t practice their children to eat on nutritious foods like fruits
and vegetables but allows them to eat junk foods.
There are 82 or 41.62% households under self-sufficient for the following reasons:

 Most members have children with normal weight.

 Most members are knowledgeable of a well-balanced diet.
As per table above, barangays Agno and Trenchera have survival households due to the following instances:

 There are few whose children are severely underweight due to knowledge deficit.
 There are few who can’t afford to buy milk for their children.
 There are few who don’t practice their children to eat on nutritious foods like fruits
and vegetables but allows them to eat junk foods.
Barangays Legaspi, Agno and Libertad are in subsistence level because of the following:

 There are few whose children are underweight and overweight.

 There are few who don’t practice their children to eat on nutritious foods like fruits
and vegetables but allows them to eat junk foods.
Barangays Legaspi, Libertad and Trenchera have self-sufficient members of households because of the
following reasons:

 Most members have children with normal weight.

 Most members are knowledgeable of a well-balanced diet.
MOO Tayug strengthens awareness of health, nutrition and its importance during family development
sessions and with the LGU, health and nutrition drives and advocacies are materialized. Day care has also
supplemental feeding activities weekly and so with barangay nutrition scholars assigned per barangay.

Page 39 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

A.2- Nutrition
Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 0 0.00 22 25.58 64 74.42 86
AMISTAD 0 0.00 8 9.20 79 90.80 87
BARANGAY A
0 0.00 2 8.33 22 91.67 24
(POB.)
BARANGAY B
0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00 6
(POB.)
BARANGAY C
0 0.00 8 21.05 30 78.95 38
(POB.)
BARANGAY D
0 0.00 4 40.00 6 60.00 10
(POB.)
BARANGOBONG 0 0.00 5 5.32 89 94.68 94
C. LICHAUCO 0 0.00 1 2.86 34 97.14 35
CARRIEDO 0 0.00 4 9.09 40 90.91 44
EVANGELISTA 0 0.00 1 2.17 45 97.83 46
GUZON 0 0.00 1 3.85 25 96.15 26
LAWAK 0 0.00 1 1.30 76 98.70 77
LEGASPI 0 0.00 19 19.00 81 81.00 100
LIBERTAD 0 0.00 13 16.05 68 83.95 81
MAGALLANES 0 0.00 1 1.43 69 98.57 70
PANGANIBAN 0 0.00 3 3.57 81 96.43 84
SALENG 0 0.00 1 3.45 28 96.55 29
SANTO
0 0.00 1 1.41 70 98.59 71
DOMINGO
TOKETEC 0 0.00 0 0.00 35 100.00 35
TRENCHERA 0 0.00 18 20.69 69 79.31 87
ZAMORA 0 0.00 5 14.71 29 85.29 34
Grand Total 0 0.00 118 10.14 1046 89.86 1164

A.2- Nutrition

10%

SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

90%

Page 40 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

The table reveals the total under Health and Nutition(of the sub variables number of meals of the family in a
day and nutritional status of children ages 0-5 ) there are no or 0 % of the total 1,164 households under
survival level. The reasons as per survey are as follows:

 Most members are health conscious.

 Most members are knowledgeable of managing simple ailments and are they are
aware of the health services found in the locale.
There are 118 or 10.14% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There are some who avail health services once or twice in the past six months.
 There are some who believed that in Eastern Pangasinan District Hospital, poor
health care deliveries are rampant.
 Some members still consult faith healers and/or quack doctors.
There are 1046 or 89.86% households under self-sufficient for the following reasons:

 Most members are health conscious nowadays.

 Mostly visit their health centers monthly especially children five and below and
whenever they feel sick.
 Many believe in health education and health advocacies.
 Nobody got sick in the last six months and if there were, it’s manageable at home.
As per table above, there are no barangays in survival level due to the following instances:

 Most members are health conscious.

 Most members are knowledgeable of managing simple ailments and are they are
aware of the health services found in the locale.
Barangay Agno and Trenchera are in subsistence level because of the following:

 There are some who avail health services once or twice in the past six months.
 There are some who believed that in Eastern Pangasinan District Hospital, poor
health care deliveries are rampant.
 Some members still consult faith healers and/or quack doctors.
Almost all barangays have self-sufficient members of households in this variable because they trust and
believe in health education, nutrition and the modern medicine and mostly are health conscious nowadays.
MOO Tayug strengthens awareness of health and its importance during family development sessions and
with the LGU, health drives and advocacies are materialized. Day care has also supplemental feeding
activities weekly and so with nutrition scholars assigned per barangay.

a. Family’s access to safe drinking water

This pertains to the access of the family to safe drinking water,
information on which may be obtained from the respondent and validated
through observation of the MLs and from the local government units (LGUs)

Page 41 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

Page 42 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

A.3a- Family's access to safe drinking water

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 0 0.00 3 3.49 83 96.51 86
AMISTAD 1 1.15 11 12.64 75 86.21 87
BARANGAY A
0 0.00 2 8.33 22 91.67 24
(POB.)
BARANGAY B
0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00 6
(POB.)
BARANGAY C
0 0.00 4 10.53 34 89.47 38
(POB.)
BARANGAY D
0 0.00 0 0.00 10 100.00 10
(POB.)
BARANGOBONG 0 0.00 0 0.00 94 100.00 94
C. LICHAUCO 0 0.00 6 17.14 29 82.86 35
CARRIEDO 0 0.00 5 11.36 39 88.64 44
EVANGELISTA 0 0.00 1 2.17 45 97.83 46
GUZON 0 0.00 0 0.00 26 100.00 26
LAWAK 0 0.00 1 1.30 76 98.70 77
LEGASPI 1 1.00 6 6.00 93 93.00 100
LIBERTAD 0 0.00 12 14.81 69 85.19 81
MAGALLANES 0 0.00 2 2.86 68 97.14 70
PANGANIBAN 0 0.00 4 4.76 80 95.24 84
SALENG 0 0.00 1 3.45 28 96.55 29
SANTO DOMINGO 0 0.00 1 1.41 70 98.59 71
TOKETEC 0 0.00 0 0.00 35 100.00 35
TRENCHERA 1 1.15 10 11.49 76 87.36 87
ZAMORA 0 0.00 5 14.71 29 85.29 34
Grand Total 3 0.26 74 6.36 1087 93.38 1164

A.3a- Family's access to safe drinking water

6%

0%

SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

93%

Page 43 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

The table reveals that under Family’s access to safe drinking water there are 3 or 0.26% of the total 1,164
households under survival level. The reasons as per survey are as follows:

 There are few households who get their water from the river.
 These few households drink river water without boiling them. Sometimes during
rainy season, they also catch water from gutter for consumption and stock them in
drums.
There are 74 or 6.36% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There are few who have dug wells.

 There are those who rely on water truck delivery.
There are 1087 or 93.38% households under self-sufficient for the following reasons:

 Many have own tubed deep well.

 Many share on community tubed deep well.
As per table above, barangays Amistad, Legaspi and Trenchera are in survival level due to the following
instances:

 There’s a river therein where they perceive as clean source of water.

 These few households drink river water without boiling them. Sometimes during
rainy season, they also catch water from gutters for consumption and stock them in
drums.
Barangays Libertad, Amistad and Trenchera are in subsistence level because of the following:

 There are few who have dug wells.

 There are those who rely on water truck delivery.
Almost all barangays have the self-sufficient members of households 100% because of the following reasons:

 Many have own tubed deep well.

 Many share on community tubed deep well.
 Many also patronize water refilling stations nowadays.
MOO Tayug strengthens awareness of health, nutrition and its importance during family development
sessions and with the LGU, health and nutrition drives and advocacies are materialized giving highlight to
safe water and the diseases it may give if it’s unsafe.

This indicator considers the family members’ access to a sanitary toilet for its use, which can
also affect the health condition of the family members. A sanitary toilet generally refers to water-
sealed toilet (with or without flush) with sewer/septic tank (posonegro) or closed pit. Other
arrangements such as an open pit and pail system are not considered sanitary.

Page 44 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

A.3b- Family's access to sanitary toilet facilities

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 5 5.81 1 1.16 80 93.02 86
AMISTAD 3 3.45 2 2.30 82 94.25 87
BARANGAY A
1 4.17 0 0.00 23 95.83 24
(POB.)
BARANGAY B
0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00 6
(POB.)
BARANGAY C
0 0.00 0 0.00 38 100.00 38
(POB.)
BARANGAY D
0 0.00 0 0.00 10 100.00 10
(POB.)
BARANGOBONG 5 5.32 0 0.00 89 94.68 94
C. LICHAUCO 0 0.00 0 0.00 35 100.00 35
CARRIEDO 0 0.00 0 0.00 44 100.00 44
EVANGELISTA 0 0.00 0 0.00 46 100.00 46
GUZON 0 0.00 0 0.00 26 100.00 26
LAWAK 0 0.00 0 0.00 77 100.00 77
LEGASPI 1 1.00 0 0.00 99 99.00 100
LIBERTAD 0 0.00 0 0.00 81 100.00 81
MAGALLANES 1 1.43 2 2.86 67 95.71 70
PANGANIBAN 0 0.00 0 0.00 84 100.00 84
SALENG 0 0.00 0 0.00 29 100.00 29
SANTO
0 0.00 0 0.00 71 100.00 71
DOMINGO
TOKETEC 0 0.00 0 0.00 35 100.00 35
TRENCHERA 1 1.15 0 0.00 86 98.85 87
ZAMORA 0 0.00 0 0.00 34 100.00 34
Grand Total 17 1.46 5 0.43 1142 98.11 1164

A.3b- Family's access to sanitary toilet facilities

1%
0%

SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

98%

Page 45 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

The table reveals that under Family’s access to sanitary toilet there are 17 or 1.46% of the total 1,164
households under survival level. The reason as per survey is as follow:

 There are few households with no toilet facilities.

There are 5 or 0.43% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There few with open pits.

 There are few who defecate in plastic bags and throw them in the rivers.
There are 1142 or 98.11% households under self-sufficient for the following reasons:

 Many have access to water sealed toilets connected to septic tanks.

 Many have closed pits.
As per table above, barangays Amistad and Barangobong are in survival level due to the following instance:

 There are few households with no access to toilet facilities till.

Barangays Agno, Amistad and Magallanes are in subsistence level because of the following:

 There few with open pits.

 There are few who defecate in plastic bags and throw them in the rivers.
Almost all barangays have the self-sufficient households because of the following reasons:

 Many have access to water sealed toilets connected to septic tanks.

 Many have closed pits.
MOO Tayug strengthens awareness of health, hygiene and its importance during family development
sessions and with the LGU, health and hygiene drives and advocacies are materialized giving highlight to
hand washing and its importance. The households with no toilet facilities were also endorsed to the LGU.

Practice of proper garbage disposal minimizes the spread of infections. It also

reduces the risk of accidental injury such as stepping on broken glasses and banana peels,
and getting burns when garbage containing flammable substances is burned. This indicator
was constructed based on the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000 (RA 92003),
which stipulates proper segregation, collection, transport, storage, treatment and disposal of
solid waste.

The law also requires all local government units to establish an ecological solid
waste management program. By monitoring this indicator, the DSWD, through you, the ML
will be in a position to help educate the family members on proper waste disposal or ask
them to attend barangay sessions on the said subject matter. Thus, you can cooperate with
the barangay council on the advocacy for the full implementation of the law.

Page 46 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

A.3c- Most common family practice garbage disposal

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 84 97.67 0 0.00 2 2.33 86
AMISTAD 81 93.10 3 3.45 3 3.45 87
BARANGAY A
(POB.) 4 16.67 0 0.00 20 83.33 24
BARANGAY B
(POB.) 0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00 6
BARANGAY C
(POB.) 8 21.05 0 0.00 30 78.95 38
BARANGAY D
(POB.) 0 0.00 0 0.00 10 100.00 10
BARANGOBONG 54 57.45 7 7.45 33 35.11 94
C. LICHAUCO 34 97.14 0 0.00 1 2.86 35
CARRIEDO 4 9.09 2 4.55 38 86.36 44
EVANGELISTA 44 95.65 2 4.35 0 0.00 46
GUZON 24 92.31 0 0.00 2 7.69 26
LAWAK 50 64.94 4 5.19 23 29.87 77
LEGASPI 77 77.00 14 14.00 9 9.00 100
LIBERTAD 50 61.73 6 7.41 25 30.86 81
MAGALLANES 46 65.71 2 2.86 22 31.43 70
PANGANIBAN 48 57.14 0 0.00 36 42.86 84
SALENG 24 82.76 1 3.45 4 13.79 29
SANTO
DOMINGO 60 84.51 0 0.00 11 15.49 71
TOKETEC 32 91.43 2 5.71 1 2.86 35
TRENCHERA 66 75.86 4 4.60 17 19.54 87
ZAMORA 25 73.53 4 11.76 5 14.71 34
Grand Total 815 70.02 51 4.38 298 25.60 1164

A.3c- Most common family practice garbage

disposal

26% SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT
4%
70%

Page 47 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

The table reveals that under Family’s most common family practice of garbage disposal there are 815 or
70.02% of the total 1,164 households under survival level. The reasons as per survey are as follow:

 Most members burn their garbage.

 Most members throw their garbage in rivers.
 There are those with no clear manner of garbage disposal.
There are 51 or 4.38% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There few with collected by trucks but not segregated.

 There are few who bury their garbage without segregation.
There are 298 or 25.60% households under self-sufficient for the following reasons:

 There are those collected by garbage trucks and segregated.

 There are those who bury their bio-degradable garbage and recycle their non-bio-
degradable ones.
As per table above, barangays Agno, Amistad and C. Lichauco have the highest survival level due to the
following instances:

 Most members burn their garbage because they are not reached by garbage trucks.
 Most members throw their garbage in rivers.
 There are those with no clear manner of garbage disposal.
Barangay Legaspi has the highest subsistence level because of the following:

 There are those collected by garbage trucks and segregated.

 There are those who bury their bio-degradable garbage and recycle their non-bio-
degradable ones.
Barangays Carriedo, Poblacion C, Barangobong and Panganiban have the self-sufficient households because
of the following reasons:

 There are those collected by garbage trucks and segregated.

 There are those who bury their bio-degradable garbage and recycle their non-bio-
degradable ones.
MOO Tayug strengthens awareness of health, hygiene and its importance during family development
sessions and with the LGU, health and hygiene drives and advocacies are materialized giving highlight to
hand washing and its importance. The barangays out of reach by garbage trucks were also endorsed to the
LGU.

Page 48 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

A.3- Water and Sanitation

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 0 0.00 84 97.67 2 2.33 86
AMISTAD 2 2.30 82 94.25 3 3.45 87
BARANGAY A
0 0.00 5 20.83 19 79.17 24
(POB.)
BARANGAY B
0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00 6
(POB.)
BARANGAY C
0 0.00 8 21.05 30 78.95 38
(POB.)
BARANGAY D
0 0.00 0 0.00 10 100.00 10
(POB.)
BARANGOBONG 0 0.00 61 64.89 33 35.11 94
C. LICHAUCO 0 0.00 34 97.14 1 2.86 35
CARRIEDO 0 0.00 7 15.91 37 84.09 44
EVANGELISTA 0 0.00 46 100.00 0 0.00 46
GUZON 0 0.00 24 92.31 2 7.69 26
LAWAK 0 0.00 54 70.13 23 29.87 77
LEGASPI 1 1.00 90 90.00 9 9.00 100
LIBERTAD 0 0.00 57 70.37 24 29.63 81
MAGALLANES 0 0.00 49 70.00 21 30.00 70
PANGANIBAN 0 0.00 50 59.52 34 40.48 84
SALENG 0 0.00 25 86.21 4 13.79 29
SANTO
0 0.00 60 84.51 11 15.49 71
DOMINGO
TOKETEC 0 0.00 34 97.14 1 2.86 35
TRENCHERA 1 1.15 69 79.31 17 19.54 87
ZAMORA 0 0.00 29 85.29 5 14.71 34
Grand Total 4 0.34 868 74.57 292 25.09 1164

A.3- Water and Sanitation

0%
25%
SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

75%

Page 49 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

The table above shows the combination of water and sanitation whereas:

 Amistad and Trenchera have survival households at 0.34%

 Agno, Legaspi and Amistad have most subsistence level at 74.57%
 Carriedo, Panganiban and Barangobong have mostly self-sufficient levels at 25.09%

Page 50 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

B. Housing
B.1a- Construction Materials
B.1a- Construction Materials of the Roof

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 0 0.00 11 12.79 75 87.21 86
AMISTAD 0 0.00 6 6.90 81 93.10 87
BARANGAY A
0 0.00 2 8.33 22 91.67 24
(POB.)
BARANGAY B
0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00 6
(POB.)
BARANGAY C
0 0.00 1 2.63 37 97.37 38
(POB.)
BARANGAY D
0 0.00 0 0.00 10 100.00 10
(POB.)
BARANGOBONG 0 0.00 23 24.47 71 75.53 94
C. LICHAUCO 0 0.00 5 14.29 30 85.71 35
CARRIEDO 0 0.00 0 0.00 44 100.00 44
EVANGELISTA 3 6.52 8 17.39 35 76.09 46
GUZON 1 3.85 12 46.15 13 50.00 26
LAWAK 0 0.00 2 2.60 75 97.40 77
LEGASPI 1 1.00 19 19.00 80 80.00 100
LIBERTAD 0 0.00 1 1.23 80 98.77 81
MAGALLANES 1 1.43 8 11.43 61 87.14 70
PANGANIBAN 0 0.00 7 8.33 77 91.67 84
SALENG 0 0.00 1 3.45 28 96.55 29
SANTO DOMINGO 2 2.82 11 15.49 58 81.69 71
TOKETEC 0 0.00 5 14.29 30 85.71 35
TRENCHERA 0 0.00 5 5.75 82 94.25 87
ZAMORA 0 0.00 3 8.82 31 91.18 34
Grand Total 8 0.69 130 11.17 1026 88.14 1164

B. Housing
B.1a- Construction Materials
B.1a- Construction Materials of the Roof

11% SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT
25%

64%

Page 51 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

The table reveals that under construction materials of roof there are 8 or 0.69% of the total 1,164 households
under survival level. The reasons as per survey are as follow:

 Few have improvised materials of roofs

 Few have mixed but predominantly salvaged materials of roof.
There are 130 or 11.17% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There are those with cogon roofs but not sturdy and durable.
 There are those with mixed light materials of roofs.
There are 1026 or 88.14% households under self-sufficient for the following reasons:

 Mostly have galvanized irons as their roofs.

 Mostly have wood and cogon but sturdy and durable.
As per table above, barangays Evangelista and Sto. Domingo have the survival level due to the following
instances:

 Few have improvised materials of roofs

 Few have mixed but predominantly salvaged materials of roof.
Barangay Barangobong, Guzon and Legaspi have the highest subsistence level because of the following:

 There are those with cogon roofs but not sturdy and durable.
 There are those with mixed light materials of roofs.
Barangays Amistad, Poblacion B, Poblacion D, Carriedo, Libertad and Saleng have the self-sufficient
households because of the following reasons:

 Mostly have galvanized irons as their roofs.

 Mostly have wood and cogon but sturdy and durable.
MOO Tayug strengthens awareness of safety and its importance during family development sessions and
with the LGU, safety drives and advocacies are materialized giving highlight to fire prevention. The
households with survival level of roofs were also endorsed to the LGU.

Page 52 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

B.1b- Construction materials of the outer walls

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 0 0.00 12 13.95 74 86.05 86
AMISTAD 1 1.15 7 8.05 79 90.80 87
BARANGAY A
0 0.00 2 8.33 22 91.67 24
(POB.)
BARANGAY B
0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00 6
(POB.)
BARANGAY C
0 0.00 3 7.89 35 92.11 38
(POB.)
BARANGAY D
0 0.00 0 0.00 10 100.00 10
(POB.)
BARANGOBONG 0 0.00 21 22.34 73 77.66 94
C. LICHAUCO 0 0.00 5 14.29 30 85.71 35
CARRIEDO 0 0.00 0 0.00 44 100.00 44
EVANGELISTA 1 2.17 17 36.96 28 60.87 46
GUZON 1 3.85 13 50.00 12 46.15 26
LAWAK 0 0.00 2 2.60 75 97.40 77
LEGASPI 1 1.00 28 28.00 71 71.00 100
LIBERTAD 0 0.00 6 7.41 75 92.59 81
MAGALLANES 1 1.43 17 24.29 52 74.29 70
PANGANIBAN 0 0.00 17 20.24 67 79.76 84
SALENG 0 0.00 5 17.24 24 82.76 29
SANTO DOMINGO 1 1.41 18 25.35 52 73.24 71
TOKETEC 0 0.00 13 37.14 22 62.86 35
TRENCHERA 1 1.15 14 16.09 72 82.76 87
ZAMORA 0.00 1 2.94 33 97.06 34
Grand Total 7 0.60 201 17.27 956 82.13 1164

B.1b- Construction materials of the outer walls

1%
17%

SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

82%

The table reveals that under construction materials of outer walls there are 7 or 0.60% of the total 1,164
households under survival level. The reasons as per survey are as follow:

Page 53 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

 Few have improvised materials of outer walls.

 Few have mixed but predominantly salvaged materials of outer walls.
There are 201 or 17.27% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There are those with cogon outer walls but not sturdy and durable.
 There are those with mixed light materials of outer walls.
There are 956 or 82.13% households under self-sufficient for the following reasons:

 Mostly have concrete outer walls.

 Mostly have sturdy and durable wood and cogon outer walls.
As per table above, barangays Amistad, Evangelista, Guzon, Sto. Domingo and Trenchera have the survival
households due to the following instances:

 There are those with cogon outer walls but not sturdy and durable.
 There are those with mixed light materials of outer walls.
Barangay Barangobong, Evangelista, Magallanes and Panganiban have the highest subsistence level because
of the following:

 There are those with cogon outer walls but not sturdy and durable.
 There are those with mixed light materials of outer walls.
Barangays Amistad, Poblacion B, Poblacion D, Carriedo, Lawak, Libertad and Zamora have the self-
sufficient households because of the following reasons:

 Mostly have concrete outer walls.

 Mostly have sturdy and durable wood and cogon outer walls.
MOO Tayug strengthens awareness of safety and its importance during family development sessions and
with the LGU, safety drives and advocacies are materialized giving highlight to fire prevention. The
households with survival level of roofs were also endorsed to the LGU.

Tenure status of house and lot.

The tenure status is a key indicator measuring the adequacy of the basic human needs
for shelter. This provides information on the informal settlers which is of special
significance to housing programs. The tenure status should be the prevailing tenure of
the house and lot at the time of the visit.

Page 54 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

B.2- Tenure status of housing unit

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 1 1.16 31 36.05 54 62.79 86
AMISTAD 2 2.30 24 27.59 61 70.11 87
BARANGAY A
0 0.00 0 0.00 24 100.00 24
(POB.)
BARANGAY B
0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00 6
(POB.)
BARANGAY C
1 2.63 2 5.26 35 92.11 38
(POB.)
BARANGAY D
0 0.00 0 0.00 10 100.00 10
(POB.)
BARANGOBONG 5 5.32 5 5.32 84 89.36 94
C. LICHAUCO 0 0.00 0 0.00 35 100.00 35
CARRIEDO 0 0.00 0 0.00 44 100.00 44
EVANGELISTA 0 0.00 2 4.35 44 95.65 46
GUZON 0 0.00 3 11.54 23 88.46 26
LAWAK 0 0.00 2 2.60 75 97.40 77
LEGASPI 11 11.00 4 4.00 85 85.00 100
LIBERTAD 0 0.00 2 2.47 79 97.53 81
MAGALLANES 3 4.29 3 4.29 64 91.43 70
PANGANIBAN 0 0.00 3 3.57 81 96.43 84
SALENG 0 0.00 2 6.90 27 93.10 29
SANTO DOMINGO 0 0.00 1 1.41 70 98.59 71
TOKETEC 1 2.86 0 0.00 34 97.14 35
TRENCHERA 0 0.00 4 4.60 83 95.40 87
ZAMORA 1 2.94 1 2.94 32 94.12 34
Grand Total 25 2.15 89 7.65 1050 90.21 1164

B.2- Tenure status of housing unit

2% 8%

SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

90%

Page 55 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

The table reveals that under tenure status of housing unit there are 25 or 2.15% of the total 1,164 households
under survival level. The reasons as per survey are as follow:

 Few have own house but rent free lot without consent of owner.
 Few have own house and lot but without consent of owner.
There are 89 or 7.65% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There are those rent free house and lot for less than five years.
 There are those rented house and lot for less than three years.
There are 1050 or 90.21% households under self-sufficient for the following reasons:

 Mostly own their house and lot.

 There are those who rent their house and lot for three years and above.
As per table above, barangays Barangobong, Legaspi and Magallanes have the survival households due to
the following instances:

 Few have own house but rent free lot without consent of owner.
 Few have own house and lot but without consent of owner.
Barangay Agno and Amistad have the highest subsistence level because of the following:

 There are those rent free house and lot for less than five years.
 There are those rented house and lot for less than three years.
Barangays Toketec, Sto. Domingo, Saleng, Libertad, Lawak, Evangelista, Carriedo, C. Lichauco Poblacion B
and Poblacion A have self-sufficient households because of the following reasons:

 Mostly own their house and lot.

 There are those who rent their house and lot for three years and above.
MOO Tayug endorsed to LGU the 114 households who do not own house and lot for lobbying to National
Housing Authority.

Lighting facility of the house.

The lighting facility should be sufficient to enable people to work and move safely.
The use of safe lighting facility is of utmost importance to prevent accidents and community
disasters.

Page 56 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

B.3- Lighting facility of the house

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 27 31.40 8 9.30 51 59.30 86
AMISTAD 16 18.39 1 1.15 70 80.46 87
BARANGAY A
(POB.) 5 20.83 1 4.17 18 75.00 24
BARANGAY B
(POB.) 0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00 6
BARANGAY C
(POB.) 2 5.26 0 0.00 36 94.74 38
BARANGAY D
(POB.) 4 40.00 0 0.00 6 60.00 10
BARANGOBONG 10 10.64 51 54.26 33 35.11 94
C. LICHAUCO 3 8.57 2 5.71 30 85.71 35
CARRIEDO 6 13.64 2 4.55 36 81.82 44
EVANGELISTA 6 13.04 19 41.30 21 45.65 46
GUZON 2 7.69 8 30.77 16 61.54 26
LAWAK 5 6.49 2 2.60 70 90.91 77
LEGASPI 23 23.00 3 3.00 74 74.00 100
LIBERTAD 9 11.11 2 2.47 70 86.42 81
MAGALLANES 8 11.43 13 18.57 49 70.00 70
PANGANIBAN 12 14.29 8 9.52 64 76.19 84
SALENG 3 10.34 0 0.00 26 89.66 29
SANTO
DOMINGO 15 21.13 3 4.23 53 74.65 71
TOKETEC 9 25.71 1 2.86 25 71.43 35
TRENCHERA 14 16.09 8 9.20 65 74.71 87
ZAMORA 5 14.71 2 5.88 27 79.41 34
Grand Total 184 15.81 134 11.51 846 72.68 1164

B.3- Lighting facility of the house

16%

SURVIVAL
12%
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

73%

Page 57 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

The table reveals that under lighting facility of the house there are 184 or 15.81% of the total 1,164
households under survival level. The reasons as per survey are as follow:

 There are few with no lighting facility.

 There are few who use gasera and candles.
There are 134 or 11.51% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There are those who utilize commercially produced kerosene.

 There are those with petromax.
There are 846 or 72.68% households under self-sufficient for the following reasons:

 Mostly have electricity.

 There are those whose electricity is connected to neighbors and relatives.
As per table above, barangays Agno, Amistad, Poblacion D and Legaspi with survival households due to the
following instances:

 There are few with no lighting facilty

 There are few who use gasera and candles.
Barangays Barangobong and Evangelista have subsistence level because of the following:

 There are those who utilize commercially produced kerosene.

 There are those with petromax.
Barangays Saleng, Libertad, Lawak, Poblacion C and Poblacion B have self-sufficient households because of
the following reasons:

 Mostly have electricity.

 There are those whose electricity is connected to neighbors and relatives.
MOO Tayug and LGU through PANELCO started information disseminations on electricity connection with
cheaper expenditures.

Page 58 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

C. Education

The first indicator under education is on the literacy of family members, both adults
and children who are aged 10 years or over, in reading, writing, counting and doing simple
calculations, and understanding simple messages/instructions. An individual may not have
finished any level of formal schooling but is able to read, write, count, and understand
simple messages/instructions. Literacy provides an important indication of the capability of
the nation for economic, social, and cultural development as well as in environmental
preservation.

C.1- Functional literacy of family members aged 10 years or over

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 5 5.81 5 5.81 76 88.37 86
AMISTAD 8 9.20 2 2.30 77 88.51 87
BARANGAY A
0 0.00 1 4.17 23 95.83 24
(POB.)
BARANGAY B
0 0.00 1 16.67 5 83.33 6
(POB.)
BARANGAY C
1 2.63 5 13.16 32 84.21 38
(POB.)
BARANGAY D
0 0.00 0 0.00 10 100.00 10
(POB.)
BARANGOBONG 0 0.00 1 1.06 93 98.94 94
C. LICHAUCO 1 2.86 2 5.71 32 91.43 35
CARRIEDO 2 4.55 3 6.82 39 88.64 44
EVANGELISTA 7 15.22 11 23.91 28 60.87 46
GUZON 0 0.00 2 7.69 24 92.31 26
LAWAK 4 5.19 12 15.58 61 79.22 77
LEGASPI 8 8.00 21 21.00 71 71.00 100
LIBERTAD 6 7.41 12 14.81 63 77.78 81
MAGALLANES 3 4.29 9 12.86 58 82.86 70
PANGANIBAN 3 3.57 8 9.52 73 86.90 84
SALENG 1 3.45 3 10.34 25 86.21 29
SANTO DOMINGO 0 0.00 4 5.63 67 94.37 71
TOKETEC 1 2.86 4 11.43 30 85.71 35
TRENCHERA 4 4.60 24 27.59 59 67.82 87
ZAMORA 2 5.88 9 26.47 23 67.65 34
Grand Total 56 4.81 139 11.94 969 83.25 1164

Page 59 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

C. Education
C.1- Functional literacy of family members aged
10 years or over

5% SURVIVAL
12% SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

83%

The table reveals that under functional literacy of family members aged 10 years or over there are 56 or
4.81% of the total 1,164 households under survival level. The reasons as per survey are as follow:

 There are few who entered school but until Grades I and II only especially the elder
members.
 There are few who cannot read and write.
There are 139 or 11.94% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There are those who find reading and writing difficult.

 There are those who understand simple instructions with difficulty.
There are 969 or 83.25% households under self-sufficient for the following reasons:

 Mostly are high school graduates.

 Mostly can read, write count and understand simple instructions with no difficulty.
As per table above, barangays Amistad and Legaspi have survival households due to the following instances:

 There are few who entered school but until Grades I and II only especially the elder
members.
 There are few who cannot read and write.
Barangays Lawak, Legaspi have s and Trenchera have subsistence level because of the following:

 There are those who find reading and writing difficult.

 There are those who understand simple instructions with difficulty.
Barangays Sto. Domingo, Guzon, C. Lichauco, Barangobong, Poblacion D and Poblacion A have self-
sufficient households because of the following reasons:

 Mostly are high school graduates.

 Mostly can read, write count and understand simple instructions with no difficulty.
MOO Tayug and LGU through DEP-ED started information disseminations on the importance of education
so ALS and Abot Alam programs were highly encouraged especially those who are undergraduates of

Page 60 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

elementary and high shool.During family development sessions, education is reiterated as integral pursuit in
fighting poverty.

Several studies show that education is one of the most important correlates of
poverty. Thus, there should be a sustained investment in human capital to make headway in
the eradication of poverty. This means that family members must be given the opportunity to
develop their capabilities by sending them to school. To be able to monitor if progress is
being achieved in this area, the school enrolment/attendance of children aged 3-17 years is a
critical indicator. Information on this indicator is necessary in the assessment of the
adequacy and overall quality of the educational system in the country, and consequently of
the quality of our human capital in the future.

Page 61 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

C.2- School enrolment/ attendance of children aged 3-17 years in formal/ informal school

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 7 8.14 24 27.91 55 63.95 86
AMISTAD 6 6.90 11 12.64 70 80.46 87
BARANGAY A
(POB.) 2 8.33 3 12.50 19 79.17 24
BARANGAY B
(POB.) 0.00 0.00 6 100.00 6
BARANGAY C
(POB.) 3 7.89 13 34.21 22 57.89 38
BARANGAY D
(POB.) 1 10.00 4 40.00 5 50.00 10
BARANGOBONG 6 6.38 4 4.26 84 89.36 94
C. LICHAUCO 2 5.71 4 11.43 29 82.86 35
CARRIEDO 6 13.64 6 13.64 32 72.73 44
EVANGELISTA 3 6.52 8 17.39 35 76.09 46
GUZON 1 3.85 2 7.69 23 88.46 26
LAWAK 4 5.19 13 16.88 60 77.92 77
LEGASPI 15 15.00 30 30.00 55 55.00 100
LIBERTAD 5 6.17 23 28.40 53 65.43 81
MAGALLANES 4 5.71 7 10.00 59 84.29 70
PANGANIBAN 5 5.95 8 9.52 71 84.52 84
SALENG 6 20.69 3 10.34 20 68.97 29
SANTO
DOMINGO 2 2.82 13 18.31 56 78.87 71
TOKETEC 2 5.71 5 14.29 28 80.00 35
TRENCHERA 9 10.34 22 25.29 56 64.37 87
ZAMORA 5 14.71 11 32.35 18 52.94 34
Grand Total 94 8.08 214 18.38 856 73.54 1164

Functional literacy ages 10 and above

8%

18%
SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

74%

Page 62 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

The table reveals that under school enrollment/attendance of children aged 3-17 years in formal/informal
school there are 94 or 8.08% of the total 1,164 households under survival level. The reasons as per survey are
as follow:

 There are few who are currently not enrolled during the home visits.
 There are few who are currently enrolled but attended less than 75% of school days
in a month.
There are 214 or 18.38% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There are few who are enrolled but attended less than 85% of school days in a
month.
 There are those who absent themselves due to scarcity issues, distant schools and
interest in manual jobs like farming where they are paid.
There are 856 or 73.54% households under self-sufficient for the following reasons:

 Mostly are enrolled and attended at least 85% of school days in a month.
 Mostly has enough fare and food so interest in going to school is not a problem.
As per table above, barangay Legaspi have survival households due to the following instances:

 There are few who are currently not enrolled during the home visits.
 There are few who are currently enrolled but attended less than 75% of school days
in a month.
Barangays Agno, Legaspi and Libertad have subsistence level because of the following:

 There are few who are enrolled but attended less than 85% of school days in a
month.
 There are those who absent themselves due to scarcity issues, distant schools and
interest in manual jobs like farming where they are paid.
Barangays Amistad, Poblacion B and Guzon have self-sufficient households because of the following
reasons:

 Mostly are enrolled and attended at least 85% of school days in a month.
 Mostly has enough fare and food so interest in going to school is not a problem.
 Schools therein are accessible and near their homes.
MOO Tayug and LGU through DEP-ED started information disseminations on the importance of education
so ALS and Abot Alam programs were highly encouraged especially those who are undergraduates of
elementary and high shool.During family development sessions, education is reiterated as integral pursuit in
fighting poverty.

Page 63 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

D. Role Performance

The importance of close family relationships in enhancing well-being cannot be

overemphasized. In studies conducted by the National Statistical Coordination Board, the
family was consistently mentioned as the top source of happiness of respondents. Effective
role performance of the family including open communication among members and
common or joint involvement of family members in recreational activities make for a
functional family that contributes to its wellbeing.

D.1- Involvement of family members in family activities

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 0 0.00 2 2.33 84 97.67 86
AMISTAD 3 3.45 9 10.34 75 86.21 87
BARANGAY A
0 0.00 1 4.17 23 95.83 24
(POB.)
BARANGAY B
0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00 6
(POB.)
BARANGAY C
0 0.00 0 0.00 38 100.00 38
(POB.)
BARANGAY D
0 0.00 0 0.00 10 100.00 10
(POB.)
BARANGOBONG 1 1.06 12 12.77 81 86.17 94
C. LICHAUCO 1 2.86 2 5.71 32 91.43 35
CARRIEDO 0 0.00 0 0.00 44 100.00 44
EVANGELISTA 0 0.00 5 10.87 41 89.13 46
GUZON 1 3.85 7 26.92 18 69.23 26
LAWAK 0 0.00 6 7.79 71 92.21 77
LEGASPI 12 12.00 22 22.00 66 66.00 100
LIBERTAD 1 1.23 7 8.64 73 90.12 81
MAGALLANES 1 1.43 15 21.43 54 77.14 70
PANGANIBAN 2 2.38 17 20.24 65 77.38 84
SALENG 0 0.00 7 24.14 22 75.86 29
SANTO DOMINGO 1 1.41 19 26.76 51 71.83 71
TOKETEC 0 0.00 19 54.29 16 45.71 35
TRENCHERA 0 0.00 9 10.34 78 89.66 87
ZAMORA 0 0.00 7 20.59 27 79.41 34
Grand Total 23 1.98 166 14.26 975 83.76 1164

Page 64 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

D. Role Performance
D.1- Involvement of family members in family
activities

1% 12% SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

87%

The table reveals that under involvement of family members in family activities there are 23 or 1.98% of the
total 1,164 households under survival level. The reasons as per survey are as follow:

 There are few who have family bonding moments at least once a month due to busy
schedules in line to jobs.
 There are few who never had bonding at all.
There are 166 or 14.26% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There are few who have family bonding but only twice a month like going to church
and picnic at the plaza.
 There are those who have family bonding only whenever the parent assigned to other
province goes home at least twice a month.
There are 856 or 73.54% households under self-sufficient for the following reasons:

 Mostly enjoy family bonding like, going to church, plaza and malls at least three
times a month or over.
 Mostly also never fail to visit their relatives especially grandparents every weekends.
As per table above, barangay Legaspi have survival households due to the following instances:

 There are few who have family bonding moments at least once a month due to busy
schedules in line to jobs.
 There are few who never had bonding at all.
Barangays Legaspi, Toketec and Sto. Domingo have subsistence levels because of the following:

 There are few who have family bonding but only twice a month like going to church
and picnic at the plaza.
 There are those who have family bonding only whenever the parent assigned to other
province goes home at least twice a month..
Barangays Agno, Poblacion A, Poblacion B, Poblacion C, Poblacion D, Carriedo, Lawak and Libertad have
self-sufficient households because of the following reasons:

Page 65 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

 Mostly enjoy family bonding like, going to church, plaza and malls at least three
times a month or over.
 Mostly also never fail to visit their relatives especially grandparents every weekends.
MOO Tayug through LGU efforts who beautify the town vicinity like the plaza, church and other parks
highly encourage family bonding to develop closer and healthier family ties.

This indicator looks into the level of maturity of the parents or guardians in the
discernment or identification of the problem and coming up with the corresponding
solutions. It also reflects the family’s practice when it comes to problem solving and
decision making, whether it is participatory, such that discussions/consultations are made
with the other family members especially when decisions will affect their lives, e.g., moving
to a new community.

Page 66 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

D.2- Ability of parents and/or guardians to discern problems in the family and arrive at solutions

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 0 0.00 2 2.33 84 97.67 86
AMISTAD 0 0.00 12 13.79 75 86.21 87
BARANGAY A
0 0.00 0 0.00 24 100.00 24
(POB.)
BARANGAY B
0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00 6
(POB.)
BARANGAY C
0 0.00 0 0.00 38 100.00 38
(POB.)
BARANGAY D
0 0.00 1 10.00 9 90.00 10
(POB.)
BARANGOBONG 2 2.13 10 10.64 82 87.23 94
C. LICHAUCO 0 0.00 8 22.86 27 77.14 35
CARRIEDO 0 0.00 0 0.00 44 100.00 44
EVANGELISTA 1 2.17 2 4.35 43 93.48 46
GUZON 0 0.00 8 30.77 18 69.23 26
LAWAK 0 0.00 12 15.58 65 84.42 77
LEGASPI 2 2.00 4 4.00 94 94.00 100
LIBERTAD 1 1.23 0 0.00 80 98.77 81
MAGALLANES 0 0.00 13 18.57 57 81.43 70
PANGANIBAN 0 0.00 11 13.10 73 86.90 84
SALENG 0 0.00 8 27.59 21 72.41 29
SANTO DOMINGO 3 4.23 16 22.54 52 73.24 71
TOKETEC 0 0.00 18 51.43 17 48.57 35
TRENCHERA 0 0.00 12 13.79 75 86.21 87
ZAMORA 0 0.00 4 11.76 30 88.24 34
Grand Total 9 0.77 141 12.11 1014 87.11 1164

D.2- Ability of parents and/or guardians to

discern problems in the family and arrive at
solutions

1% 12% SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

87%

Page 67 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

The table reveals that under ability of parents and guardians to discern problems in the family and arrive at
solutions there are 9 or 0.77% of the total 1,164 households under survival level. The reasons as per survey
are as follow:

 There are few who do not recognize the cause of family problems if there are.
 There are few who just ignore the family problem.
There are 141 or 12.11% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There are few who can define family problems but can’t think of possible solutions.
 There are few who can define the problem but don’t consult other family members
on the solutions to the problems.
There are 1014 or 87.11% households under self-sufficient for the following reasons:

 Most parents and guardians are able to define the problem and the solutions to it with
consultation to other family members.
 Most parents/guardian have rapport with other family members and practices open
communication.
As per table above, barangays Sto. Domingo, Legaspi and Barangobong have survival households due to the
following instances:

 There are few who do not recognize the cause of family problems if there are.
 There are few who just ignore the family problem.
Barangays Magallanes, Toketec and Sto. Domingo have subsistence levels because of the following:

 There are few who can define family problems but can’t think of possible solutions.
 There are few who can define the problem but don’t consult other family members
on the solutions to the problems.
Barangays Agno, Poblacion A, Poblacion B, Poblacion C, Poblacion D, Carriedo and Legaspi have self-
sufficient households because of the following reasons:

 Most parents and guardians are able to define the problem and the solutions to it with
consultation to other family members.
 Most parents/guardian have rapport with other family members and practices open
communication.
MOO Tayug through family development sessions highly encourage open communication to develop closer
and healthier family ties, respect and understanding.

Page 68 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

This indicator aims to measure the degree of participation in any legitimate or widely
recognized organization or association in the community that captures the family’s
involvement in community-wide activities. It is a measure of the sense of belonging of the
family in the community. These organizations or associations include people’s
organizations, support groups, socio-civic and religious organizations and other community
associations such as KALIPI, Catholic Women’s League, Pag-asa Youth Association, etc.

Active participation is defined as attendance and/or participation in more than 50%

of the meetings and activities of the organization/association/support groups during the past
six months.

D.3- Participation of family members in legitimate or widely-recognized people’s organizations/

associations or support groups during the past six months
Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 0 0.00 0 0.00 86 100.00 86
AMISTAD 0 0.00 0 0.00 87 100.00 87
BARANGAY A
(POB.) 0 0.00 0 0.00 24 100.00 24
BARANGAY B
(POB.) 0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00 6
BARANGAY C
(POB.) 0 0.00 0 0.00 38 100.00 38
BARANGAY D
(POB.) 0 0.00 0 0.00 10 100.00 10
BARANGOBONG 0 0.00 2 2.13 92 97.87 94
C. LICHAUCO 0 0.00 1 2.86 34 97.14 35
CARRIEDO 0 0.00 0 0.00 44 100.00 44
EVANGELISTA 0 0.00 1 2.17 45 97.83 46
GUZON 0 0.00 0 0.00 26 100.00 26
LAWAK 0 0.00 0 0.00 77 100.00 77
LEGASPI 1 1.00 0 0.00 99 99.00 100
LIBERTAD 0 0.00 1 1.23 80 98.77 81
MAGALLANES 0 0.00 5 7.14 65 92.86 70
PANGANIBAN 0 0.00 2 2.38 82 97.62 84
SALENG 0 0.00 0 0.00 29 100.00 29
SANTO DOMINGO 0 0.00 6 8.45 65 91.55 71
TOKETEC 0 0.00 3 8.57 32 91.43 35
TRENCHERA 0 0.00 1 1.15 86 98.85 87
ZAMORA 0 0.00 1 2.94 33 97.06 34
Grand Total 1 0.09 23 1.98 1140 97.94 1164

Page 69 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

D.3- Participation of family members in legit -

imate or widely-recognized people’s organi-
zations/
associations or support groups during the
past six months
SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
2% SELF SUFFICIENT
0%

98%

The table reveals that under participation of family members on widely recognized people’s organization
there is 1 or 0.09% of the total 1,164 households under survival level. The reason as per survey is as follow:

 There is one household from Legaspi with no affiliations to widely recognized

organizations at all.
There are 23 or 1.98% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There are few who are members of KALIPI and Guardians Tayug chapter but are not
active to the activities for the past six months from barangays Sto. Domingo,
Magallanes, Toketec, Barangobong, C. Lichauco, Evangelista, Libertad, Panganiban,
Trenchera and Zamora.
There are 1140 or 97.94% households under self-sufficient for the following reasons:

 Most female grantees in all the barangays are active members of Tayug Kalipi.
 Most male grantees and household heads (fathers) in all the barangays are active
members of Guardians Tayug chapter.
MOO Tayug through family development sessions highly encourage members to join at least one widely
known organization to develop and enhance their interpersonal skills, sense of responsibility and oneness.

Page 70 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

E. Family Awareness of Relevant Social Issues

This indicator aims to find out whether the family knows about the rights of children.
The Convention on Rights of the Child stipulates the basic human rights that children
everywhere must have: for instance, the right to survival, to develop to the fullest, to receive
protection from harmful influences, abuse and exploitation and to participate fully in family,
cultural and social life.

E.1- Awareness of the rights of children

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 0 0.00 1 1.16 85 98.84 86
AMISTAD 1 1.15 3 3.45 83 95.40 87
BARANGAY A
0 0.00 0 0.00 24 100.00 24
(POB.)
BARANGAY B
0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00 6
(POB.)
BARANGAY C
0 0.00 2 5.26 36 94.74 38
(POB.)
BARANGAY D
0 0.00 0 0.00 10 100.00 10
(POB.)
BARANGOBONG 9 9.57 17 18.09 68 72.34 94
C. LICHAUCO 1 2.86 20 57.14 14 40.00 35
CARRIEDO 0 0.00 0 0.00 44 100.00 44
EVANGELISTA 0 0.00 3 6.52 43 93.48 46
GUZON 0 0.00 5 19.23 21 80.77 26
LAWAK 0 0.00 5 6.49 72 93.51 77
LEGASPI 0 0.00 5 5.00 95 95.00 100
LIBERTAD 2 2.47 7 8.64 72 88.89 81
MAGALLANES 2 2.86 8 11.43 60 85.71 70
PANGANIBAN 2 2.38 4 4.76 78 92.86 84
SALENG 0 0.00 18 62.07 11 37.93 29
SANTO DOMINGO 3 4.23 43 60.56 25 35.21 71
TOKETEC 0 0.00 34 97.14 1 2.86 35
TRENCHERA 2 2.30 1 1.15 84 96.55 87
ZAMORA 1 2.94 12 35.29 21 61.76 34
Grand Total 23 1.98 188 16.15 953 81.87 1164

Page 71 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

E. Family Awareness of Relevant Social Issues

E.1- Awareness of the rights of children

11%
1%
SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

89%

The table reveals that under awareness of respondents to the rights of children there are 23 or 1.98% of the
total 1,164 households under survival level. The reason as per survey is as follow:

 There are few who memorize one or two rights of children but are unable to explain
them.
There are 188 or 16.15% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There are few who can recognize three rights of children but can’t explain them.
 There are few who can recognize two rights of children and are able to explain them.
There are 953 or 81.87% households under self-sufficient for the following reason:

 Most respondents are able to enumerate 5 rights of children and explain them
properly.
As per table above, barangays Barangobong and Sto. Domingo have survival households due to the
following instance:

 There are few who memorize one or two rights of children but are unable to explain
them.
Barangays Sto. Domingo, Toketec and C. Lichauco have subsistence levels because of the following:

 There are few who can recognize three rights of children but can’t explain them.
 There are few who can recognize two rights of children and are able to explain them.
Most barangays have self-sufficient households because of the following reason:

 Most respondents are able to enumerate 5 rights of children and explain them
properly.
MOO Tayug through family development sessions highly reiterates the rights of a child. Also in schools and
other LGU-DSWD initiated advocacies.

Page 72 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

In the manual entitled, A Practical Approach to Gender-based Violence of the

UNFPA, gender-based violence (GBV) is described as both reflecting and reinforcing
inequities between men and women and compromising the health, dignity, security and
autonomy of its victims. It encompasses a wide range of human rights violations, including
sexual abuse of children, rape, domestic violence, sexual assault and harassment, trafficking
of women and girls and several harmful traditional practices. Any one of these abuses can
leave deep psychological scars, damage the health of women and girls in general, including
their reproductive and sexual health, and in some instances, result in death.

Moreover, GBV is violence that is directed against a person on the basis of gender. It
constitutes a breach of the fundamental right to life, liberty, security, dignity, equality
between women and men, non-discrimination and physical and mental integrity.

E.2- Awareness of gender-based violence

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 0 0.00 1 1.16 85 98.84 86
AMISTAD 0 0.00 2 2.30 85 97.70 87
BARANGAY A
0 0.00 0 0.00 24 100.00 24
(POB.)
BARANGAY B
0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00 6
(POB.)
BARANGAY C
0 0.00 1 2.63 37 97.37 38
(POB.)
BARANGAY D
0 0.00 0 0.00 10 100.00 10
(POB.)
BARANGOBONG 6 6.38 24 25.53 64 68.09 94
C. LICHAUCO 2 5.71 21 60.00 12 34.29 35
CARRIEDO 0 0.00 1 2.27 43 97.73 44
EVANGELISTA 0 0.00 3 6.52 43 93.48 46
GUZON 0 0.00 6 23.08 20 76.92 26
LAWAK 0 0.00 4 5.19 73 94.81 77
LEGASPI 0 0.00 5 5.00 95 95.00 100
LIBERTAD 3 3.70 7 8.64 71 87.65 81
MAGALLANES 0 0.00 10 14.29 60 85.71 70
PANGANIBAN 0 0.00 6 7.14 78 92.86 84
SALENG 0 0.00 19 65.52 10 34.48 29
SANTO
2 2.82 55 77.46 14 19.72 71
DOMINGO
TOKETEC 0 0.00 34 97.14 1 2.86 35
TRENCHERA 0 0.00 2 2.30 85 97.70 87
ZAMORA 1 2.94 12 35.29 21 61.76 34
Grand Total 14 1.20 213 18.30 937 80.50 1164

Page 73 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

E.2- Awareness of gender-based violence

1%
18%

SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

80%

The table reveals that under awareness of respondents to gender based violence there are 14 or 1.20% of the
total 1,164 households under survival level. The reasons as per survey are as follows:

 There are few who are not aware of any gender based violence, they seem to not care
at all.
 There are few who recognizes at least two gender based violence but aren’t able to
explain them.
There are 213 or 18.30% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There are few who can recognize three gender-based violence but aren’t able to
explain them.
 There are few who can recognize two gender based violence and are able to explain
them.
There are 937 or 80.50% households under self-sufficient for the following reason:

 Most respondents are able to enumerate three gender based violence and explain
them properly.
As per table above, barangays Barangobong and Libertad have survival households due to the following
instances:

 There are few who are not aware of any gender based violence, they seem to not care
at all.
 There are few who recognizes at least two gender based violence but aren’t able to
explain them.
Barangays Sto. Domingo and Toketec have subsistence levels because of the following:

 There are few who can recognize three gender based violence but can’t explain them.
 There are few who can recognize two gender based violence and are able to explain
them.

Page 74 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

Most barangays have self-sufficient households because of the following reason:

 Most respondents are able to enumerate three gender based violence and explain
them properly.
MOO Tayug through family development sessions highly reiterates the gender based violence in relation to
the law where it is anchored. Also in schools and other LGU-DSWD initiated advocacies.

Throughout the history of the Philippines, disasters have happened in various parts of
the country. Unmistakably, floods and storms have been the most frequently occurring
hazards. This confirms the high level of our exposure to hazards due to our geography. The
National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Plan envisions a country of “safer,
adaptive and disaster-resilient Filipino communities toward sustainable development”.23 It
aims towards a proactive disaster risk reduction and management (DRRM) wherein men and
women have increased awareness and understanding on DRRM, with the end in view of
increasing people’s resilience and decreasing their vulnerabilities. With the occurrence of
the Typhoon Yolanda (Haiyan) in 2013, the importance of awareness of DRRM has
heightened.
Family disaster awareness aims to inculcate in the family the value and importance
of family disaster preparedness

Page 75 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

E.3- Awareness of disaster risk reduction and management

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 0 0.00 1 1.16 85 98.84 86
AMISTAD 0 0.00 2 2.30 85 97.70 87
BARANGAY A
(POB.) 0 0.00 0 0.00 24 100.00 24
BARANGAY B
(POB.) 0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00 6
BARANGAY C
(POB.) 0 0.00 0 0.00 38 100.00 38
BARANGAY D
(POB.) 0 0.00 0 0.00 10 100.00 10
BARANGOBONG 1 1.06 16 17.02 77 81.91 94
C. LICHAUCO 3 8.57 2 5.71 30 85.71 35
CARRIEDO 0 0.00 0 0.00 44 100.00 44
EVANGELISTA 0 0.00 0 0.00 46 100.00 46
GUZON 0 0.00 2 7.69 24 92.31 26
LAWAK 0 0.00 0 0.00 77 100.00 77
LEGASPI 0 0.00 1 1.00 99 99.00 100
LIBERTAD 2 2.47 4 4.94 75 92.59 81
MAGALLANES 0 0.00 3 4.29 67 95.71 70
PANGANIBAN 0 0.00 2 2.38 82 97.62 84
SALENG 0 0.00 1 3.45 28 96.55 29
SANTO
DOMINGO 1 1.41 20 28.17 50 70.42 71
TOKETEC 1 2.86 0 0.00 34 97.14 35
TRENCHERA 0 0.00 1 1.15 86 98.85 87
ZAMORA 1 2.94 0 0.00 33 97.06 34
Grand Total 9 0.77 55 4.73 1100 94.50 1164

E.3- Awareness of disaster risk reduction and

management

5%

1%
SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

95%

Page 76 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

The table reveals that under awareness of respondents to disaster risk reduction and management there are 9
or 0.77% of the total 1,164 households under survival level. The reasons as per survey are as follows:

 There are few who are not aware of what to do during disaster.
 There are few who recognizes at least two disaster risk reduction and management
protocols but aren’t able to explain them.
There are 55 or 4.73% households under subsistence level because of the following:

 There are few who can recognize three disaster risk reduction and management
protocols but aren’t able to explain them.
 There are few who can recognize two disaster risk reduction and management
protocols and are able to explain them.
There are 1100 or 94.50% households under self-sufficient for the following reason:

 Most respondents are able to enumerate three disaster risk reduction and
management protocols and explain them properly.
As per table above, barangays C. Lichauco and Libertad have survival households due to the following
instances:

 There are few who are not aware of what to do during disaster.
 There are few who recognizes at least two disaster risk reduction and management
protocols but aren’t able to explain them.
Barangays Sto. Domingo and Barangobong have subsistence levels because of the following:

 There are few who can recognize three disaster risk reduction and management
protocols but aren’t able to explain them.
 There are few who can recognize two disaster risk reduction and management
protocols and are able to explain them.
Most barangays have self-sufficient households because of the following reason:

 Most respondents are able to enumerate three disaster risk reduction and
management protocols and explain them properly.
MOO Tayug through family development sessions highly reiterates the disaster risk reduction and
management protocols to avoid mortalities during disasters and also collaborates with LGU and schools in
their field demonstrations in relation to it.

Page 77 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

HEALTH (TOTAL)

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 0 0 29 33.72 57 66.28 86
AMISTAD 0 0 28 32.18 59 67.82 87
BARANGAY A
0 0 4 16.67 20 83.33 24
(POB.)
BARANGAY B
0 0 0.00 6 100.00 6
(POB.)
BARANGAY C
0 0 12 31.58 26 68.42 38
(POB.)
BARANGAY D
0 0 3 30.00 7 70.00 10
(POB.)
BARANGOBONG 0 0 21 22.34 73 77.66 94
C. LICHAUCO 0 0 19 54.29 16 45.71 35
CARRIEDO 0 0 5 11.36 39 88.64 44
EVANGELISTA 0 0 3 6.52 43 93.48 46
GUZON 0 0 11 42.31 15 57.69 26
LAWAK 0 0 32 41.56 45 58.44 77
LEGASPI 0 0 31 31.00 69 69.00 100
LIBERTAD 0 0 27 33.33 54 66.67 81
MAGALLANES 0 0 19 27.14 51 72.86 70
PANGANIBAN 0 0 20 23.81 64 76.19 84
SALENG 0 0 5 17.24 24 82.76 29
SANTO
0 0 11 15.49 60 84.51 71
DOMINGO
TOKETEC 0 0 3 8.57 32 91.43 35
TRENCHERA 0 0 40 45.98 47 54.02 87
ZAMORA 0 0 16 47.06 18 52.94 34
Grand Total 0 0 339 29.12 825 70.88 1164

HEALTH

29%
SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

71%

 0% survival households.

Page 78 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

 C. Lichauco has greater subsistence level among other barangays with a total of 29.12% all in
all.
 Most barangays are in self-sufficient level at 70.88%.

Page 79 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

HOUSING

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 1 1.16 39 45.35 46 53.49 86
AMISTAD 2 2.30 27 31.03 58 66.67 87
BARANGAY A
0 0.00 2 8.33 22 91.67 24
(POB.)
BARANGAY B
0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00 6
(POB.)
BARANGAY C
1 2.63 3 7.89 34 89.47 38
(POB.)
BARANGAY D
0 0.00 0 0.00 10 100.00 10
(POB.)
BARANGOBONG 5 5.32 19 20.21 70 74.47 94
C. LICHAUCO 0 0.00 2 5.71 33 94.29 35
CARRIEDO 0 0.00 0 0.00 44 100.00 44
EVANGELISTA 0 0.00 11 23.91 35 76.09 46
GUZON 0 0.00 13 50.00 13 50.00 26
LAWAK 0 0.00 2 2.60 75 97.40 77
LEGASPI 11 11.00 19 19.00 70 70.00 100
LIBERTAD 0 0.00 3 3.70 78 96.30 81
MAGALLANES 3 4.29 9 12.86 58 82.86 70
PANGANIBAN 0 0.00 8 9.52 76 90.48 84
SALENG 0 0.00 2 6.90 27 93.10 29
SANTO
0 0.00 11 15.49 60 84.51 71
DOMINGO
TOKETEC 1 2.86 4 11.43 30 85.71 35
TRENCHERA 0 0.00 8 9.20 79 90.80 87
ZAMORA 1 2.94 2 5.88 31 91.18 34
Grand Total 25 2.15 184 15.81 955 82.04 1164

HOUSING

2%
16%

SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

82%

Page 80 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

 Legaspi has most survival among other barangays with total of 2.15% all in all.
 Guzon and Agno have greater subsistence level among other barangays with a total of 15.81%
all in all.
 Most barangays are in self-sufficient level at 82.04%.

Page 81 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

EDUCATION

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 4 4.65 29 33.72 53 61.63 86
AMISTAD 1 1.15 21 24.14 65 74.71 87
BARANGAY A
0 0.00 4 16.67 20 83.33 24
(POB.)
BARANGAY B
0 0.00 1 16.67 5 83.33 6
(POB.)
BARANGAY C
0 0.00 17 44.74 21 55.26 38
(POB.)
BARANGAY D
0 0.00 5 50.00 5 50.00 10
(POB.)
BARANGOBONG 0 0.00 9 9.57 85 90.43 94
C. LICHAUCO 1 2.86 6 17.14 28 80.00 35
CARRIEDO 1 2.27 12 27.27 31 70.45 44
EVANGELISTA 4 8.70 16 34.78 26 56.52 46
GUZON 0 0.00 4 15.38 22 84.62 26
LAWAK 0 0.00 26 33.77 51 66.23 77
LEGASPI 4 4.00 47 47.00 49 49.00 100
LIBERTAD 2 2.47 35 43.21 44 54.32 81
MAGALLANES 1 1.43 16 22.86 53 75.71 70
PANGANIBAN 1 1.19 18 21.43 65 77.38 84
SALENG 1 3.45 9 31.03 19 65.52 29
SANTO
0 0.00 17 23.94 54 76.06 71
DOMINGO
TOKETEC 1 2.86 7 20.00 27 77.14 35
TRENCHERA 3 3.45 39 44.83 45 51.72 87
ZAMORA 1 2.94 18 52.94 15 44.12 34
Grand Total 25 2.15 356 30.58 783 67.27 1164

EDUCATION

2%

31%
SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT
67%

Page 82 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

 Agno, Evangelista and Legaspi have most survival among other barangays with total of 2.15%
all in all.
 Legaspi, Libertad and Trenchera have greater subsistence level among other barangays with a
total of 30.58% all in all.
 Most barangays are in self-sufficient level at 67.27%.

Page 83 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

ROLE PERFORMANCE

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 0 0.00 4 4.65 82 95.35 86
AMISTAD 1 1.15 21 24.14 65 74.71 87
BARANGAY A
0 0.00 1 4.17 23 95.83 24
(POB.)
BARANGAY B
0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00 6
(POB.)
BARANGAY C
0 0.00 0 0.00 38 100.00 38
(POB.)
BARANGAY D
0 0.00 1 10.00 9 90.00 10
(POB.)
BARANGOBONG 0 0.00 19 20.21 75 79.79 94
C. LICHAUCO 1 2.86 7 20.00 27 77.14 35
CARRIEDO 0 0.00 0 0.00 44 100.00 44
EVANGELISTA 0 0.00 5 10.87 41 89.13 46
GUZON 1 3.85 8 30.77 17 65.38 26
LAWAK 0 0.00 13 16.88 64 83.12 77
LEGASPI 1 1.00 39 39.00 60 60.00 100
LIBERTAD 1 1.23 7 8.64 73 90.12 81
MAGALLANES 0 0.00 22 31.43 48 68.57 70
PANGANIBAN 1 1.19 21 25.00 62 73.81 84
SALENG 0 0.00 8 27.59 21 72.41 29
SANTO
1 1.41 26 36.62 44 61.97 71
DOMINGO
TOKETEC 0 0.00 20 57.14 15 42.86 35
TRENCHERA 0 0.00 12 13.79 75 86.21 87
ZAMORA 0 0.00 7 20.59 27 79.41 34
Grand Total 7 0.60 241 20.70 916 78.69 1164

ROLE PERFORMANCE

1%
21%
SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

79%

 Few have most survival among other barangays with total of 0.60% all in all.

Page 84 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

 Legaspi and Sto. Domingo has greater subsistence level among other barangays with a total of
20.70% all in all.
 Most barangays are in self-sufficient level at 78.69%.

Page 85 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

Family Awareness of Relevant Social Issues

Grand
BARANGAY SV % SB % SS %
Total
AGNO 0 0.00 1 1.16 85 98.84 86
AMISTAD 0 0.00 4 4.60 83 95.40 87
BARANGAY A
0 0.00 0 0.00 24 100.00 24
(POB.)
BARANGAY B
0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00 6
(POB.)
BARANGAY C
0 0.00 2 5.26 36 94.74 38
(POB.)
BARANGAY D
0 0.00 0 0.00 10 100.00 10
(POB.)
BARANGOBONG 9 9.57 22 23.40 63 67.02 94
C. LICHAUCO 3 8.57 20 57.14 12 34.29 35
CARRIEDO 0 0.00 1 2.27 43 97.73 44
EVANGELISTA 0 0.00 3 6.52 43 93.48 46
GUZON 0 0.00 7 26.92 19 73.08 26
LAWAK 0 0.00 5 6.49 72 93.51 77
LEGASPI 0 0.00 10 10.00 90 90.00 100
LIBERTAD 2 2.47 9 11.11 70 86.42 81
MAGALLANES 1 1.43 11 15.71 58 82.86 70
PANGANIBAN 0 0.00 9 10.71 75 89.29 84
SALENG 0 0.00 19 65.52 10 34.48 29
SANTO
2 2.82 55 77.46 14 19.72 71
DOMINGO
TOKETEC 1 2.86 33 94.29 1 2.86 35
TRENCHERA 1 1.15 3 3.45 83 95.40 87
ZAMORA 1 2.94 12 35.29 21 61.76 34
Grand Total 20 1.72 226 19.42 918 78.87 1164

Family Awareness of Relevant Social Issues

2%
19%
SURVIVAL
SUBSISTENCE
SELF SUFFICIENT

79%

Page 86 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

 Few have most survival among other barangays with total of 1.72% all in all.
 Toketec and Sto. Domingo have greater subsistence level among other barangays with a total of
19.42% all in all.
 Most barangays are in self-sufficient level at 78.87%.

Page 87 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

IV. Summary

Based from the data gathered thru the administration of SWDI, the results revealed that out of the 1,164 total
number of administered SWDI there are 2 households (0.17% ) under survival, 878 households (75.43% ) under
subsistence and 284 households (24.40% ) under self- sufficient level of wellbeing.

Result of Social Welfare and Development Indicator (SWDI) Baseline

Assessment
August - October 2015
Tayug, Pangasinan

Result of SWDI Baseline Assessment

No. of HHs
INDICATORS Subsistenc Self-
assessed Survival
e Sufficient
I - Economic Sufficiency 1164 333 732 99
A. Employable Skills
Occupational skills of family members aged 18 years or over 1164 788 336 40
B. Employment
Working status of family members aged 18 years or over 1164 676 389 99
C. Income
Family monthly per capita income in the past six months 1164 328 301 535
D. Social Security
Membership or access of family to formal financial
1164 59 1082 23
institutions
II - SOCIAL ADEQUACY 1164 0 482 682
A. Health 1164 0 339 825
1. Health Condition and Availment of Health Services 1164 12 210 942
a. Availment of family members of accessible health
1164 39 103 1022
services in the past six months
b. Health condition of family members in the past six
1164 17 106 1041
months
2. Nutrition 1164 0 118 1046
a. Number of meals the family had in a day 1164 0 5 1159
b. Nutritional status of children aged 5 years or below
Total Assessed 1164 57 58 82
Households with 0-5 years old 197
Households without 0-5 years old 967
3. Water and Sanitation
a. Family's access to safe drinking water 1164 3 74 1087
b. Family's access to sanitary toilet facilities 1164 17 5 1142
c. Most common family practice garbage disposal 1164 815 51 298
B. Housing 1164 25 184 955
1a. Construction materials of the roof 1164 8 130 1026
1b. Construction materials of the outer walls 1164 7 201 956
2. Tenure status of housing unit 1164 25 89 1050
3. Lighting facility of the house 1164 184 134 846
C. Education 1164 24 357 783
1. Functional literacy of family members aged 10 years or
1164 55 139 970
over
2. School enrolment/attendance of children aged 3-17 years
1164 94 214 856
in formal/informal school

Page 88 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

D. Role Performance of Family 1164 7 241 916

1. Involvement of family members in family activities 1164 23 166 975
2. Ability of parents and/or guardians to discern problems in
1164 9 141 1014
family and arrive at solutions
3. Participation of family members in legitimate or widely-
recognized people's organizations/ associations or support 1164 1 23 1140
groups in the past six months
E. Family Awareness of Relevant Social Issues 1164 20 226 918
1. Awareness of the rights of children 1164 23 188 953
2. Awareness of gender-based violence 1164 14 213 937
3. Awareness of disaster risk reduction and management 1164 9 55 1100
No. of Households under Survival, Subsistence & Self-sufficient level of wellbeing per Barangay.

Economic Sufficiency Social Adequacy

732
682

482

333

99

Survival Subsistence Self-sufficient

No. of Households under Survival, Subsistence and Self-sufficient level of wellbeing in the 2
main Categories, Economic Sufficiency and Social Adequacy.

 There are more households under survival level of well being in the main variable Economic
Sufficiency because most households have no employable skills, unemployed and with less
income.
 There are less households under subsistence level of well being in the main variable Social
Adequacy because only few have no access to safe drinking water, sanitary toilet facilities,
sturdy and durable housing materials, functional literacy, appreciative school attendance,
good role performance and positive awareness of relevant social issues.
 There are more households under self sufficient level of well being in the main variable
Social Adequacy because there are many who already have access to safe drinking water,
sanitary toilet facilities, sturdy and durable housing materials, functional literacy,
appreciative school attendance, good role performance and positive awareness of relevant
social issues.

Page 89 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

IV – Conclusion

Poverty is a crime and in a third world country like the Philippines, it’s more of a lifestyle already. The rich
becomes richer and the poor becomes poorer hence the birth of intergenerational poverty that’s bugging the populace
like thief in broad daylight making life harder to most Filipinos. To worst, education and health which are significant
factors in improving one’s quality of life is altered and for many, sacrificed.

Out of 1164 households assessed for SWDI there are two households under survival, 878 households under
subsistence and 284 under self-sufficient. Major components of the tool are Economic Sufficiency where most
households are in survival level and Social Adequacy where most households are self-sufficient. Under economic
sufficiency, there’s the municipal action plan wherein all efforts from Sustainable Livelihood Program, Pantawid
Pilipino Program and LGU shall be collaborated as powerful intervention to uplift the levels of well-being of this
component (Economic Sufficiency) improving the whole SWDI score to a better level.

SWDI is a significant tool of assessing shifts in the level of well-being of our partner beneficiaries. It reflects
how effective the programs and efforts of the government in combatting the intergenerational poverty of the Philippines.
It also suggests continuity and enhancement of useful interventions and predicts other necessary actions in improving
the levels of well-being as well as sustenance of their present developed state.

When will poverty end? If people will be satisfied and be not greedy, there will be equal allocations of goods
and services to everyone. Right education as advocated by the program (Pantawid) would lead to better perspectives in
population control, healthy lifestyle and sound living. If one is born poor, he/she should die rich.

V – Recommendation

One can’t stand alone. The success of a good venture shall be handled by many in order to come up with a
better approach and eventually the precise interventions. Collaboration, rapport and proper endorsement would entail a
positive output.

As stipulated in the municipal action plan 2016, there are 880 households who need to be lifted to higher levels
of well-being. Sustainable livelihood program committed 229 households to serve this year and the rest shall be
intervened by efforts of MOO Tayug and LGU with the help of other generous government and private agencies.

VI - References
 Social Welfare and Development Indicator Manual
 Social Welfare and Development Indicator Information System
 Municipal Action Plan (MAP), Other sources

Social Welfare Indicator Administrators:

 Joeffrey Ryan L. Estolas/ Municipal Link/ Pantawid Pamilya

 Danice Danica L. Cardenas/ Municipal Link/ Pantawid Pamilya
 Maria Editha U. Manuel/ Social Welfare Assistant/ Pantawid Pamilya
 Marjorie Garcia/ SWO III/ Pantawid Pamilya
 Jemmah Arevalo/ PDO II/ SLP

Page 90 of 91
Analysis of Administered Social Welfare and Development Indicator August-October 2015

Prepared by:

Joeffrey Ryan L. Estolas

Municipal Link/MAT Leader

Danice Danica L. Cardenas

Municipal Link

Maria Editha U. Manuel

Social Welfare Assistant

Reviewed by:

Marjorie Garcia
Social Welfare Officer III

Noted By:

Eva Fe Terte
Provincial Link

Page 91 of 91