UD-4 Intro & Assignment Notes
UD-4 Intro & Assignment Notes
Part 1
Urban design policies and guidelines
Understanding Urban design through case studies :
Brown field development :
• Urban redevelopment
• Urban revitalization
• Urban renewal
• Urban regeneration
• Urban rehabilitation
• Urban conservation
Green field development :
Urban water front development :
Part 2
Urban design process
Structure plan
DCR
Master plan / Development plan
Zoning regulation
Urban arts commission
Urban heritage commission
Government and non – government agencies
UD implementing agencies
UD project Financing agencies
Urban design policies and guidelines
3.Maintain and reinforce the integrity of the public realm- stress the importance of
building materials, public art, public expression, landscaping, and streetscapes:
we all “experience” place, in our own unique, individual ways.
4. Emphasize the significance of public infrastructure – recognize that the physical
assets collectively owned by the community perform vital public functions and are a
tangible expression of our collective commitment to the future as a community, not a
collection of individuals.
5.Encourage multiple uses, functions & expressions – recognize the importance of mixed-
use, Density, diversity, whimsy and creativity.
6.Encourage multiple design expressions – avoid “one size fits all” or pre packaged,
off the shelf solutions.
7.Maintain a people and pedestrian orientation - give priority to living beings over
machines
12. Promote community involvement and engagement listen to the voice and
will of the community. Help cultivate and shape it.
13.Respect context and place based research and analysis – insist on factual and
historically accurate analysis.
Part-1
Urban renewal
Urban renewal, which is generally called
urban regeneration - is a program of
land redevelopment in old areas and
moderate to high density urban land use.
URBAN RENEWAL
AYA NAGAR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
URBAN DESIGN
The spread of unauthorized construction in our cities has assumed significant
proportions. One such unauthorized colony is Aya Nagar, situated on the
south-western edge of Delhi. The original Aya Nagar settlement was a village
populated largely by ‘gujjjars’. The recent extension of the village is settled
by migrants from all parts of the country, and the population is now over a
hundred thousand persons, mostly from a low-income background. The
settlement now represents a microcosm of urbanizing India, and it could
serve as a model for understanding the morphology of such ‘spontaneous’
urban development taking place in most cities of the country.
In 1999, the Chief Minister of Delhi visited Aya Nagar and declared it to
be a model village where effective planning methods are required with
the combined effort of government agencies and local residents. To
achieve this goal, the Aya Nagar Vikas Samiti was registered in 2001 to
be the voice of local people and a task force which will implement the
plans proposed for development by the government.
1
Case Studies on Urban
Regeneration
• PROJECT OUTCOMES
• The renowned landscape architecture firm Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates, Inc (MVVA) took the lead in designing the site,
applying state-of-the-art landscape design to the park’s goals of preserving the “monumental character” of the formerly industrial
waterfront and its dramatic views, reintroducing self-sustaining ecosystems, and catalyzing new social and recreational possibilities.
The effort won the American Planning Association’s 2014 National Planning Excellence Award for Urban Design. The landscaping
features environmentally sustainable designs such as green roofs and storm water recycling facilities. The design proved its
resilience by withstanding Hurricane Sandy in 2012. In addition to the park itself, the site includes:
COMMUNITY-BASED SUPPORT
The Brooklyn Heights Association (BHA), an activist group representing Brooklyn
Heights, one of New York City’s wealthiest neighborhoods, has waged various legal
battles against the project over the years. Brooklyn Heights abuts the project site,
with multi-million-dollar homes located along the Brooklyn Heights promenade
having views directly onto the site. This particular community preferred that the
Piers be redeveloped into solely a park, without any – or as little as possible —
commercial uses or private development. The founding MOU required that the park
must be ‘financially self-sustaining’ in order to, among other reasons, not add costs
to the already lean operating budget and capacities of the City’s Department of
Parks and Recreation. Nevertheless, the BHA lobbied heavily against the inclusion of
private development within the park’s footprint.
FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY
In 2015, the BBPDC released additional land, at Pier 6, for development. Part of the
reason given by the BBPDC was that the park required more funds than originally
anticipated for capital expenses to shore up existing infrastructure (sizeable sections
of the park are built atop hundreds of wooden pylons left over from 100-plus years
of maritime activities on the piers and that are built into the East River). Also, land
values – and the associated property taxes – for the private development on the site
and surrounding communities had risen, yet the New York City Department of
Finance, which administers PILOTs, supposedly had not adequately incorporated such View of the Brooklyn Bridge Park Playground
increases into the assessments. The purported need for more development, in order
to generate funds to support ongoing operations and anticipated capital upgrades,
raised questions about how appropriate PILOTs are as a tool of financial
sustainability. Some opponents of PILOTs claimed that use of the tool strips the city’s
general budget of the share of property taxes that would otherwise flow to other
public services, including to other city parks.
BROOKLYN BRIDGE PARK
BROOKLYN BRIDGE PARK
Thank you