Dasymetric Method
Dasymetric Method
Definitions:
Dent (1999) defined a dasymetric map as one that displays statistical surface data
by exhaustively partitioning space into zones that reflect the underlying statistical
surface variation.
Eicher and Brewer (2001) state that a dasymetric map depicts quantitative areal
data using boundaries that divide the mapped area into zones of relative
homogeneity with the purpose of best portraying the underlying statistical surface.
Although dasymetric maps are closely related to the choropleth maps, they differ
in several ways:
The zonal boundaries on dasymetric maps are based on sharp changes in the
statistical surface being mapped, while zonal boundaries on choropleth maps
demarcate enumeration unit established for more general purposes (for
example: states within India). The cartographer generates dasymetric zones
by using ancillary/ supportive information. This information can be both
objective and subjective, depending on other available data and the
cartographer’s knowledge of the area.
Individual dasymetric zones are developed to be internally homogeneous. In
contrast, Choropleth zones are not defined based on the data and, thus have
varying levels of internal homogeneity.
In Choropleth technique we are able to show only one class whereas in
dasymetric technique we can show both the land use areas i.e. cropland and
urban area. In this way, we can say that by using dasymetric technique we
are able to show local variations and the outcome would be relatively close
to the reality.
Today, dasymetric mapping occupies a remarkable place among
cartographic techniques that have recently attracted renewed interest
because of rapid progress in GIS and remote sensing technologies. The
application of dasymetric method using airborne and satellite imagery, is
among the most rapidly growing fields of digital cartography.
Method of Dasymetric mapping:
The dasymetric map although often made from similar initial data as used in
choropleth map assumes the existence of areas of relatively homogeneity
which are further separated from one another by zones of rapid change. By
subdivision of original statistical unit area, cartographer can add additional
detail.
It must be noted that data itself will not indicate to the cartographer the
kind of subdivision that should be made or where the zones of rapid change
occur. Here, related variables prove helpful as they add some geographical
sense into base statistics and that are commonly gathered on the basis of
enumeration units for. For this, we need:
To consult topographical and land utilization maps of the region under
consideration and then to pick out from these maps, areas such as
agricultural, forestland, Hills etc. on which no or very little settlements exist.
To delimit settlement zones as denoted by settlement patterns. The zones
have to be superimposed upon the base map. Then, there areas must be
measured to calculate the density.
Finally, the data of the newly delimited areas is classified and mapped
following the simple Choropleth method.