100% found this document useful (1 vote)
217 views13 pages

Comparison of Shoulder Muscle Strengthening Exercises With The Conventional Treatment of Mechanical Neck Pain

This document summarizes a study that compared shoulder muscle strengthening exercises to conventional treatment for mechanical neck pain. 30 patients with neck pain were randomly assigned to two groups - Group A received traditional treatment plus shoulder exercises, Group B received only traditional treatment. Both groups participated in 5 sessions per week for 3 weeks. Outcome measures like pain, range of motion, and disability were assessed before, during, and after treatment. The results showed that both groups had reduced pain and improved range of motion and function, with Group A showing slightly more improvement. The conclusion was that shoulder muscle strengthening was as effective as conventional treatment alone for mechanical neck pain.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
217 views13 pages

Comparison of Shoulder Muscle Strengthening Exercises With The Conventional Treatment of Mechanical Neck Pain

This document summarizes a study that compared shoulder muscle strengthening exercises to conventional treatment for mechanical neck pain. 30 patients with neck pain were randomly assigned to two groups - Group A received traditional treatment plus shoulder exercises, Group B received only traditional treatment. Both groups participated in 5 sessions per week for 3 weeks. Outcome measures like pain, range of motion, and disability were assessed before, during, and after treatment. The results showed that both groups had reduced pain and improved range of motion and function, with Group A showing slightly more improvement. The conclusion was that shoulder muscle strengthening was as effective as conventional treatment alone for mechanical neck pain.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13

ISSN: 2277-1700 ● Website: http://srji.drkrishna.co.in ● URL Forwarded to: http://sites.google.

com/site/scientificrji

COMPARISON OF SHOULDER MUSCLE STRENGTHENING EXERCISES


WITH THE CONVENTIONAL TREATMENT OF MECHANICAL NECK
PAIN

*Dr. Deepak Raghav, **Dr. Sabiha, ***Dr. Monika, ****Dr. Tanvi

ABSTRACT
Background and Purpose: Although there have been previous researches reporting that scapula-thoracic
muscles such as the rhomboids, middle trapezius, and lower trapezius are thought to contribute to postural
stability of the cervical spine and reduce biomechanical loading of cervico-scapular musculature but
currently it is not known whether scapula-thoracic muscle strength is impaired in patients with chronic
neck pain compared to healthy individuals. Thereby this study is being conducted to see the effect of
shoulder muscles Strengthening on Mechanical neck pain. Methods: 30 patients who have been diagnosed
to have postural neck pain have been randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Each group
consisted of 15 patients of both genders. Group A will be administered the traditional treatment protocol
with the addition of shoulder muscle strengthening exercises and Group B will be administered traditional
treatment . Both the groups will be administered 5 sessions per week for 3 weeks Visual analogue scale,
range of motion and neck disability index were the outcome measure and their scores for all groups were
taken prior ,at seventh week and after the training. Results: The pre and post treatments VAS (score) of two
groups showing that the mean VAS in both groups decreased (improved) after the treatments, and at final
evaluation, the decrease (improvement) was evident slightly higher in Group A than Group B. Comparison
between the 2 groups for extension ROM it showed that both the groups were equally effective. For side
flexion the comparison between the 2 groups proved equal effectiveness in both the groups. The pre and

28
Scientific Research Journal of India ● Volume: 3, Issue: 1, Year: 2014

post treatments Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores of two groups showing that the mean NDI scores in
both groups decreased (improved) after the treatments and the decrease (improvement) was evident
comparatively higher in Group A (73.9%) than Group B (66.0%). Conclusion: The conclusion of the study
was that the Shoulder Muscle strengthening protocol was equally effective as the conventional treatment
protocol, in case of Mechanical neck pain

Keywords: Strengthening exercises, Mechanical neck pain, Visual analogue scale, Range of motion, Neck
disability index

INTRODUCTION Australian Acute Musculoskeletal Pain


guidelines group also recommended for neck
Neck pain is a common occurrence & some of
pain for no known cause the term Idiopathic
disability within the population with a lifetime
3 Neck Pain .The Neck Task Force proposed the
include as high as 54% .In the general
term Translatory neck pain instead of acute,
population up to 30%-50% of adults
short duration for sub-acute and long duration
experience neck pain at least once per year
for chronic neck pain 7.
(Martin Scherer et al., 2012) 4. Non-specific
According to several studies of patients, neck
neck pain has a postural or mechanical basis
pain may underlie impaired postural balance
and affects about two thirds of people at some
(Marie B. Jorgensen et al., 2011) 8. Most
stage, especially in middle age. Acute neck
patients who present with neck pain have non-
pain resolves within days or weeks but may
specific (simple) neck pain, where symptoms
become chronic in about 10% of people6.
have a postural or mechanical basis.
Bogduk & Mc Guirk et al also suggest that
Etiological factors are poorly understood and
neck pain maybe subdivided into upper
are usually multi-factorial, including poor
cervical spinal pain and lower cervical spinal
posture, anxiety, depression, neck strain, and
pain, above and below an imaginary transverse
sporting or occupational activities ( Haqberg
line through C4. From upper cervical
9,33
et al.,2000) . Aberrant activity within the
segments, pain can usually be referred to the
three portions of the trapezius muscle and
head whereas from the lower cervical
associated changes in scapular posture have
segments pain can be referred to the scapular
been identified as potential contributing
region, anterior chest wall, shoulder or upper
factors (Sally Wegner et al. 2010)1.
limb7.
Bad posture causes shortening of muscular
The Bone & Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task
fibers around articulation atlanto- occipitalis
Force on Neck Pain & its associated disorder
and overstretching of muscles around joints
describe neck pain as pain located in the
and thus possibly chronic neck pain. Chronic
anatomical region of the neck with or without
neck pain is often a widespread sensation with
radiation to head, trunk or upper limbs. The

29
ISSN: 2277-1700 ● Website: http://srji.drkrishna.co.in ● URL Forwarded to: http://sites.google.com/site/scientificrji

hyperalgesia in the ligaments and muscles SOURCE: Department of Physiotherapy


during both passive and active movements. It Santosh Medical & Dental College &
has also been stated that forward head posture Hospital, Ghaziabad.
may affect not only neck but also the thoracic Subjects who fulfilled the inclusion criteria
spine and shoulder blade, possibly causing and were ready to attend exercise program
overall imbalance in the musculoskeletal regularly were selected.
system (Jung-Ho Kang et al., 2012) .11 To participate subjects had to meet the
Neck pain causes considerable personal inclusion criteria: (i) Subjects with age of 20-
discomfort due to pain, disability, and 45 years. (ii) Subjects with history of
impaired quality of life, and may affect work. restriction of movement (iii) neck pain.
Studies have shown that physical training, (iv)forward head posture. (v) Unilateral
including specific exercises targeting the deep pain.32, 11,14
postural muscles of the cervical spine, is Exclusion Criteria for the subjects were: (i)
effective in reducing neck pain for patients Tumour. (ii) Infection. (iii) Non mechanical
with chronic neck pain. Exercise & vigorous neck pain. (iv) Herniated disc. (v) spinal
physical activities have a beautiful effect on fracture. (vi)Recent cervical surgery.
12
neck pain .
Technical information:
Jensin et al. found that strengthening &
A pre-post experimental design was used. The
fitness exercise is effective in reducing the
13 subjects were invited to participate in the
prevalence of neck pain . In addition to
study and were divided accordingly into two
gaining neck muscle strength, neck strength
groups. A detailed explanation of the
training has been shown to be effective in
procedure was given to the patients after
reducing neck pain & the disability associated
14 which they signed informed consent.
with it (Petri K. Salo et al.) . Stretching and
strengthening exercise reduces chronic neck 30 patients who have been diagnosed to
pain compared with usual care 6. groups traditional treatment of Hot Pack (20
minutes)88+ Cervical Isometrics+ Chin Tucks+
19,88
METOHDS Static Stretching (5 reptts,30 seconds)
exercises will be done. The treatment protocol
Selection and description of participants: was carried out for approximately 40-45
A sample of 50 subjects participated in the minutes including the application of Moist
study, out of which 20 subjects could not heat Pack for 20 minutes
complete the study. In Group A along with the traditional
treatment have postural neck pain have been
randomly assigned to one of the two treatment

30
Scientific Research Journal of India ● Volume: 3, Issue: 1, Year: 2014

groups. Each group consisted of 15 patients of slightly higher in Group A than Group B.
both genders. Group A will be administered Pre and post treatments Flexion levels
the traditional treatment protocol with the (Mean ± SD) of two groups
addition of shoulder muscle strengthening Pre and post treatments Flexion levels (Mean ±
exercises and Group B will be administered SD) of two groups showing an increase in the
traditional treatment . Both the groups will be Range of motion. The pre and post treatments
administered 5 sessions per week for 3 weeks. Flexion levels (degree) of two groups are
In both the, shoulder muscle strength training summarized in the table showing that the
will be done91 including the muscles- Serratus mean Flexion levels in both groups increased
Anterior, Supraspinatus, Infraspinatus & (improved) after the treatments, and at final
Upper Trapeziu evaluation, the increase (improvement) was
evident slightly higher in Group B (13.2%)
Statistics
than Group A (12.0%).
The data were summarized as Mean ± SD. The
Pre and post treatments Extention levels
groups were compared by repeated measures
mean ± ± SD) of two groups
analysis of variance (ANOVA) using general
Pre and post treatments Extension levels (Mean
linear models (GLM) and the significance of
± SD) of two groups depicting a similar scale
mean difference within and between the
of improvement in the range. The pre and post
groups was done by Tukey’s post hoc test
treatments Extension levels (degree) of two
after ascertaining normality by Shapiro-Wilk’s
groups are summarized in the table showed that
test and homogeneity of variances by
the mean Extension levels in both groups
Levene’s test. A two-sided (α=2) p<0.05 was
increased (improved) after the treatments, and
considered statistically significant. All
at final evaluation, the increase (improvement)
analyses were performed on STATISTICA
was evident slightly higher in Group B (12.2%)
(version 6.0) software.
than Group A (11.1%).

RESULTS
Pre and post treatments Side flexion levels
Pre and post treatments VAS score(Mean ±
(Mean ± SD) of two groups
SD) of two groups
Pre and post treatments Side flexion levels
Pre and post treatments VAS scores (Mean ±
(Mean ± SD) of two groups showing the
SD) of two groups showing a gradual decrease
effectiveness of both the protocols. The pre
in the score.The pre and post treatments VAS
and post treatments Side flexion levels
(score) of two groups showing that the mean
(degree) of two groups are summarized in the
VAS in both groups decreased (improved)
table showing that the mean Side flexion
after the treatments, and at final evaluation,
levels in both groups increased (improved)
the decrease (improvement) was evident

31
ISSN: 2277-1700 ● Website: http://srji.drkrishna.co.in ● URL Forwarded to: http://sites.google.com/site/scientificrji

after the treatments, and at final evaluation,


the increase (improvement) was evident
slightly higher in Group A (12.9%) than
Group B (11.4%).

Pre and post treatments Lateral rotation


levels (Mean ± SD) of two groups
Pre and post treatments Lateral rotation levels
(Mean ± SD) of two groups indicating an
increase in the ranges. The pre and post
treatments Lateral rotation levels (degree) of
two groups are summarized in the table
showing that the mean Lateral rotations in
both groups increased (improved) after the
treatments and the increase (improvement)
was evident slightly higher in Group B
(21.2%) than Group A (20.5%). Comparative mean Flexion levels between the
groups.

P Pre and post treatments NDI scores


(Mean ± SD) of two groups
Pre and post treatments NDI scores (Mean ±
SD) of two groups. The pre and post
treatments Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores
of two groups are summarized in the table
showing that the mean NDI scores in both
groups decreased (improved) after the
treatments and the decrease (improvement)
was evident comparatively higher in Group A Comparative mean Extension levels between
(73.9%) than Group B (66.0%). the groups.

32
Scientific Research Journal of India ● Volume: 3, Issue: 1, Year: 2014

When the VAS score comparison was made


between the groups it showed similar decrease
indicating that both the groups are equally
effective for improving postural neck pain.
Comparing the two groups against each other
proved that both the groups were equally
effective. As we make comparison between
the 2 groups for extension ROM it showed
Comparative mean Side flexion levels within that both the groups were equally effective.
the groups For side flexion the comparison between the 2
groups proved equal effectiveness in both the
groups. Comparing Group A v/s Group B for
lateral rotation it was evident that both the
groups had similar improvement. When N.D.I.
scores were compared between the groups it
showed similar improvement in both the
groups.
The net results when observed clearly showed
that in terms of VAS Group A had more
Comparative mean NDI scores within the
effectiveness than Group B, while in Flexion
groups.
range of motion Group B proved to be better
than Group A. In case of Extension range of
motion Group B had better effectiveness but
as of Side Flexion range of motion Group A
proved better & for Lateral Rotation range of
motion Group B was marginally better than
Group A. As we talk of Neck Disability Index
Group A showed a marked better effect when
compared to Group B.
Comparative mean Lateral rotation levels This study was carried out for the reason that
within the groups. currently it is not known whether scapula-

DISCUSSION thoracic muscle strength is impaired in


patients with chronic neck pain compared to
The aim of the study was to compare the
healthy individuals. Katrina Maluf et al.
shoulder strengthening program with the
supports the shoulder muscle strengthening
conventional treatment of postural neck pain.
33
ISSN: 2277-1700 ● Website: http://srji.drkrishna.co.in ● URL Forwarded to: http://sites.google.com/site/scientificrji

protocol by stating that Scapulo-thoracic stabilizer muscle weakness. Physiotherapists


muscles such as the rhomboids, middle usually recommend using the chin-tuck
trapezius, and lower trapezius are thought to exercises to correct this faulty posture83.
contribute to postural stability of the cervical The neck retractions for proper posture by
spine and reduce biomechanical loading of moving the neck backward to a position over
1
cervico-scapular musculature . the shoulders, then a cranio-cervical flexion
Years ago, Gordon compared the effects of which is a nodding action to affect the deep
strength and endurance training on muscle flexors of the neck for which the terminology
proteins. Strength training adds to the portion is chin tucking exercise. These exercises have
of the muscle that generates tension, the shown an immediate pain reduction response.
contractile proteins. Connective tissue and These neck exercises also help reverse the ill
tendons grow in size and toughness when they effects of poor neck posture, neck related
are placed under tension. This increased headaches and the pain of arthritis. They are a
toughness in tendons may help quiet the simple and pro-active approach to improve the
inhibitory influence of the muscle receptor coordination and fitness of your neck muscles.
known as the tendon organ, a receptor These exercises target the deeper muscles
sensitive to stretching. The increase in which guide movements are important for
thickness of connective tissue contributes preventing injury and they often become weak
somewhat to the growth or hypertrophy of the when you are in pain and thus require specific
muscle43. therapeutic exercises to activate and train
The effects of conventional group cannot be them. Strength training results in muscle
overlooked. Moist heat therapy is known to hypertrophy, an increase in the cross-sectional
have effects on pain and spasm and thus can size of existing fibers. This is achieved by
attribute to pain relief and improved tissue increasing the number of myofibrils,
extensibility in both the groups88,89. sarcoplasmic volume, protein, supporting
Anna Sjors et al stated that neck shoulder pain connective tissue. Also strength training
remains a major problem in tasks with high programs increase the intramuscular stores
exposure to awkward working positions, such as adenosine tri-phosphate (ATP),
repetitive movements and movements with creatine phosphate (CP) and glycogen.
high precision demands. The reduction in the pain following static
Janda et al described a cervical upper crossed stretching can be explained on the basis of
syndrome to show the effect of a poking chin inhibitory effects of GTO (which causes a
posture on the muscles. Forward head posture dampening effect on the motor neuronal
(FHP) is one of the most common faulty discharges, thereby causing relaxation of the
postures to be accompanied by the deep neck musculotendinous unit by resetting its resting

34
Scientific Research Journal of India ● Volume: 3, Issue: 1, Year: 2014

length) and Pacinian corpuscle Also the comparison of other technique with
modification.These reflexes will allow proposed technique can be done in future.
relaxation in musculotendinous unit tension A larger sample size can be taken up for the
and decreased pain perception88. study.
The combination of stabilization exercises and
chin-tuck exercises provide not only the better LIMITATION OF STUDY
correction effect for Forward head posture in 1. The study has limited sample size and
neck pain patients, but could be provided a short period of intervention. Increasing the
83
more effective and stable corrected posture . sample size would have increased the
The variations in the results occur due to statistical power of the study.
difference in characteristics 2. Duration of the study was limited.
3. Electromyography could not be used due
FUTURE RESEARCH to unavailability.
This study has provided a positive outcome of 4. Less Trials.
the experimental method conducted in order to 5. Instrumental error could not be ruled out.
treat the proposed condition, still it provides
us with a chance to further modify the CONCLUSION
methodology and conduct a new study. The conclusion of the study was that the
Extending the duration of the study will make Shoulder Muscle strengthening protocol was
up for future prospects. equally effective as the conventional treatment
Future study can be done on another protocol, in case of Mechanical neck pain,
population. therefore the null hypothesis is rejected.

REFERENCES

1. SallyWegner , Gwendolen Jull, Shaun O'Leary , Venerina Johnston ; The effect of a scapular postural
correction strategy on trapezius activity in patients with neck pain; Manual Therapy;2010:1-5
2. Bahar Shahidi, Cynthia L Johnson, Douglas Curran-Everett and Katrina S Maluf Reliability and
group differences in quantitative cervicothoracic measures among individuals with and without
chronic neck pain; BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Vol 3
3. Nicok.H.Raney, Evan J. Peterson, Tracy A. Smith, James E. Cowar, Daniel G. Rendeiro, Gal D.
Dayle & John D. Childs; Development of a clinical prediction rule to identify patients with neck pain
likely to benefit from cervical traction & exercises; ; European Spine Journal 2009 March;18(3);382-
391.
4. Martin Scherer, Helene Schaefer, Eva Blozik, Jean Francois Chenot, Wolfgang Hinumel; The
experience and management of neck pain in general practice-the patients perspective; European
Spine Journal 2010 19(6) 963-971, published online Feb 2012.
5. Petri K. Salo, Arja H. Hakkinen Kantianu & Jari J. Ykinen; Effect of neck –strength training on
health related quality of lifein females with chronic neck pain : A randomized controlled 1 year follow
up study; Health & quality of life outcomes 2010;8:48
6. Allan, Binder; Neck Pain; Clinical Evidence 2008; 2008:1103.

35
ISSN: 2277-1700 ● Website: http://srji.drkrishna.co.in ● URL Forwarded to: http://sites.google.com/site/scientificrji

7. Victoria Misailida, Parasheni Malleiou, Anastesia Beneka, Alexandros Karagiannidis, Georhios


Godolias; Assessment of patients with neck pain: a review of definition, selection criteria &
measurement tools; Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 2010 June;9(2):49-59.
8. Marie B. Jorgensen, Joregen H. Skotte, Andreas Holtermann, Gisele Sjogaard, Nicolas C. Peterson &
Karen Sogaard; Neck Pain and Postural Balance among workers with high postural demands- a
cross sectional study; Biomedcentral – musculoskeletal disorders 2011,12:176.
9. Haqberg M, Harms Ringdahl K, Nisell R, Hjelm E.W.; Rehabilitation of Neck shoulder Pain in
women industrial workers: a randomized trial comparing isometric shoulder endurance training with
isometric shoulder strength training ; Arch Physiological Medical Rehabilitation 2000
Aug;8(18):1051-8.
10. Mettek Zebris, Lars L. Anderson, Mogens T Pederson, Peter Motensen, Christoffer H Anderson, Mette
M. Pederson, Marriane Boyser, Kirsten K Rossler, Harald Hannerz, Oles Mortensen & Gisela
Sjogard; Implementation of neck shoulder exercises for pain relief among industrial workers: A
randomized controlled trial; Biomedcentral Musculoskeletal Disorders 2011;12-205.
11. Jung-Ho Kang, Rae-Young Park, Su-Jin Lee, Ja-Young Kim, Seo-Ra Yoon and Kwang-Ik Jung; The
Effect of The Forward Head Posture on Postural Balance in Long Time Computer Based Worker;
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine 2012 Feburary:36(1):98-104.
12. Inge Ris Hansen, Karen Søgaard, Robin Christensen, Bente Thomsen, Claus Manniche, and Birgit
Juul- Kristensen Neck exercises, physical and cognitive behavioral-graded activity as a treatment for
adult whiplash patients with chronic neck pain: Design of a randomized controlled trial;(This is a
study design presented before the study was conducted)
13. Ekalak Sitthipornvorakul, Prawit Janwantankul, Nithima Purepong, Praneet Pensri & Allard J.
Vander Beck; The association between physical activity and neck and low back pain; European Spine
Journal 2011 May;20(5):677-689.
14. Petri K. Salo,Arja H.. Hakkinan, Hannu Kartianan, Jari J Ylinen, Effect of neck strength training on
healthy related quality of life in females with chronic neck pain : a randomized controlled study : 1
year; Health Quality Life Outcomes 2010; 8:48, published online 2010 May 4.
15. Wim Jorritsma,Grietje E.de Vruis,Pieter U. Dijktstra,Jan H.B. Geertzer, Michael F. Reneman; Neck
Pain & Disability Scale & Neck Disability Index : Validity of Dutch Language versions; ; European
Spine Journal 2012 January ;21(1):93-100
16. Emily R. Howell ; The association between neck pain, Neck Disability Index & Cervical Range of
Motion; Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association2011 September:55(3):211-221
17. Ewa Misterska, Roman Jankowski, Maciej Glowacki; Cross cultural adaptation of the Neck Disability
Index & Copenhagen Neck functional Disability Scale for patients with neck pain due to degenerative
& discopathic disorders. Psychometric properties of Polish version;Biomedcentral-musculoskeletal
disorders 2011;12:84, published online 2011 April 29
18. Chantal H.P. Dekoming,J Bartsteal,Bouvian C.M. Smiths-Engelsman & Erik J.M. Hinduls;
Clinimetric evaluation of Active Range of Motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain:
systematic review; . European Spine Journal 2008 Jul,17(7);905-921,published online 2008 april22.
19. Phil Page; Current concepts in muscle stretching for exercise & rehabilitation; International Journal
of Sports Physical Therapy.
20. Romy Lauche, Holger Cramer, Kyung-Eun Choi, Thomas Rampp, Felix Joyonto Saha, Gustav J
Dobos and Frauke Musial; The influence of a series of five dry cupping treatments on pain and
mechanical thresholds in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain - a randomised controlled pilot
study
21. Bahar Shahidi, Cynthia L Johnson, Douglas Curran-Everett, and Katrina S Maluf; Reliability and
group differences in quantitative cervicothoracic measures among individuals with and without
chronic neck pain; Biomedcentral Musculoskeletal Disorders 2012; 13: 215.
22. Jan Lucas Hoving, Jan JM Pool, Henk van Mameren, Walter JLM Devillé, Willem JJ Assendelft,
Henrica CW de Vet, Andrea F de Winter, Bart W Koes, and Lex M Bouter Reproducibility
measurements of the range of motion are an important prerequisite for the interpretation of study
result; BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005; 6: 59.
23. Wegner S, Jull G, O'Leary S, Johnston V. The effect of a scapular postural correction strategy on
trapezius activity in patients with neck pain; Manual Therapy. 2010 Dec; 15(6):562-6.
24. Ana Cláudia Violino Cunha, Thomaz Nogueira Burke, Fábio Jorge Renovato França, and Amélia
Pasqual Marques; Effect of Global Posture Reeducation and of Static Stretching on Pain, Range of

36
Scientific Research Journal of India ● Volume: 3, Issue: 1, Year: 2014

Motion, and Quality of Life in Women with Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial; ;
Clinics. 2008 December; 63(6): 763–770.
25. René Fejer, Kirsten Ohm Kyvik, and Jan Hartvigsen; The prevalence of neck pain in the world
population: a systematic critical review of the literature; European Spine Journal 2006 June; 15(6):
834–848.
26. Jamie Mansell, Ryan T Tierney,Michael R Sitler, Kathleen A Swanik, and David Stearne; Resistance
Training and Head-Neck Segment Dynamic Stabilization in Male and Female Collegiate Soccer
Players; Journal of Athletic Training 2005 Oct-Dec; 40(4): 310–319.

27. S Bot, J M van der Waal, C Terwee, D A W M van der Windt, F Schellevis, L Bouter, and J Dekker;
Incidence and prevalence of complaints of the neck and upper extremity in general practice; Annals
of Rheumatological Disorders 2005 January; 64(1): 118–123.
28. Michael Bergin, James M. Elliott, Gwendolen A. Jull; The Case of the Missing Lower Trapezius
Muscle; Journal of Orthopedics Sports Physical Therapy 2011;41(8):614.
29. Marloes Thoomes-de Graaf, Maarten S. Schmitt; The Effect of Training the Deep Cervical Flexors on
Neck Pain, Neck Mobility, and Dizziness in a Patient With Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain After
Prolonged Bed Rest: A Case Report ; Journal of Orthopedic Sports Physical Therapy
2012;42(10):853-860.
30. Anastasia Gkotsi,1 Dimosthenis Petsas,Vasilios Sakalis,Asterios Fotas, Argyrios Triantafyllidis,
Ioannis Vouros, Evangelos Saridakis, Georgios Salpiggidis,and Athanasios Papathanasiou;Pain
point system scale (PPSS): a method for postoperative pain estimation in retrospective studies; ;
Journal of Pain Research 2012; 5: 503–510.
31. Martin Scherer, Eva Blozik, Wolfgang Himmel, Daria Laptinskaya, Michael M. Kochen, and
Christoph Herrmann-Lingen ;Psychometric properties of a German version of the neck pain and
disability scale; European Spine Journal 2008 July; 17(7): 922–929.
32. Jasper M. Schellingerhout, Arianne P. Verhagen, Martijn W. Heymans, Bart W. Koes, Henrica C. de
Vet, and Caroline B. Terwee; Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients
with neck pain: a systematic review;Quality of Life Research. 2012 May; 21(4): 659–670.
33. JOHN D. CHILDS, Joshua A. Cleland , James M. Elliott, Deydre S. Trehen,Robert S Wainner,Julie M
Whitman,Bernard J. Sopky, Joseph J. Godges, Timothy W. Flynn,Clinical Practice Guidelines Linked
tothe International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health From the Orthopaedic
Section of the American Physical Therapy Association Journal of Orthopedics Sports Physical
Therapy 2008;38(9):A1-A34.
34. Afsun Nodehi Moghadam, Roghayeh Mohammadi, Amir Massoud Arab, and Anoshirvan
Kazamnajad, The effect of shoulder core exercises on isometric torque of glenohumeral joint
movements in healthy young females
35. Aaron Sciascia and Robin Cromwell; Kinetic Chain Rehabilitation: A Theoretical Framework;
Rehabilitation Research Practical 2012; 2012: 853037.
36. Angela Tate, Gregory N. Turner, Sarah E. Knab, Colbie Jorgensen, Andrew Strittmatter, Lori A.
Michener, Risk Factors Associated With Shoulder Pain and Disability Across the Lifespan of
Competitive Swimmers; Journal of Athletic Training, 2012 Mar-Apr; 47(2): 149–158.
37. Selma Cvijetic, Simeon Grazio, Milica Gomzi, Ladislav Krapac, Tomislav Nemcic, Melita Uremovic,
and Jasminka Bobic, Muscle strength and bone density in patients with different rheumatic
conditions: cross-sectional study; Croation Medical Journal 2011 April; 52(2): 164–170.
38. Jennifer A Klaber Moffett, David A Jackson, Stewart Richmond, Seokyung Hahn, Simon Coulton,
Amanda Farrin, Andrea Manca, David J Torgerson; Randomized trial of a brief physiotherapy
intervention compared with usual physiotherapy for neck pain patients: outcomes and patients'
preference; BioMedical Journal 2005 January 8; 330(7482):75.
39. Soraya M.V. Costa, Yumi E.T. Chibana, Leandro Giavarotti, Débora S. Compagnoni, Adriana H.
Shiono, Janice Satie, and Eduardo S.B. Bracher; Effect of spinal manipulative therapy with stretching
compared with stretching alone on full-swing performance of golf players: a randomized pilot trial;
Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 2009 December; 8(4): 165–170.
40. Nizar Abd Jalil, Mohammad Saufi Awang,and Mahamarowi Omar; Scalene Myofascial Pain
Syndrome Mimicking Cervical Disc Prolapse: A Report of Two Cases Scalene; The Malaysian
Journal of Medical Sciences2010 Jan-Mar; 17(1): 60–66.
41. Afsun Nodehi Moghadam, Roghayeh Mohammadi, Amir Massoud Arab, and Anoshirvan
Kazamnajad, The effect of shoulder core exercises on isometric torque of glenohumeral joint

37
ISSN: 2277-1700 ● Website: http://srji.drkrishna.co.in ● URL Forwarded to: http://sites.google.com/site/scientificrji

movements in healthy young females; Journal of Research in Medical Sciences 2011 December
16(12): 1555–1563.
42. Megan M. Heintz and Eric J. Hegedus; Multimodal Management of Mechanical Neck Pain Using a
Treatment Based Classification System; Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy 2008; 16(4):
217–224.
43. Smith, R., and O. Rutherford. 1995. The role of metabolites in strength training, European journal of
applied physiology and occupational physiology 71:332-36
44. MACKENZIE, B. (2003) Strength comes in many forms - here is how to develop them Available from:
http://www.brianmac.co.uk/articles.
45. David Maggie for spurlings and postural neck pain and upper crossed syndrome.pg 131
46. Carolyn Kisner and Lynn Allen Colby; Therapeutic Exercise Foundation & Techniques; Resistance
Training;4th edition;60-61,80-81
47. Carolyn Kisner and Lynn Allen Colby; Therapeutic Exercise Foundation &
Techniques;Stretching;4th edition,172
48. Beaulieu,JA;Developing a stretching program;The Physician & Sports Medicine 9:59,1981.
49. Hertling D & Kessler, RM: Introduction to Manual Therapy. In Hertling, D and Kessler, RM:
Management of Common Musculoskeletal Disorders, ed 3, Lippincott, Philadelphia,1996, pp 112-132
50. Cynthia norkinns for ROM(chap 1)
51. Cote P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L. The factors associated with neck pain and its related disability in the
Saskatchewan population. Spine. 2000;25:1109–1117.
52. Cote P, Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Kristman V. The annual incidence and course of neck pain in the
general population: a population-based cohort study. Pain. 2004;112:267–273.
53. Carroll LJ, Hogg-Johnson S, Velde G, Haldeman S, Holm LW, Carragee EJ, et al. Course and
prognostic factors for neck pain in the general population: results of the Bone and Joint Decade
2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine. 2008;33:S75–S82.
54. Hogg-Johnson S, Velde G, Carroll LJ, Holm LW, Cassidy D, Guzman J, et al. The burden and
determinants of neck pain in the general population: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010
Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine. 2008;33(Suppl):S39–S51
55. Makela M, Heliovaara M, Sievers K, et al. Prevalence, determinants, and consequences of chronic
neck pain in Finland. Am J Epidemiol1991;134:1356–1367
56. Bogduk N., McGuirk B. Management of acute and chronic neck pain: an evidence based approach.
Pain research and clinical management. 1st ed. Elsevier
57. Falla D. Unravelling the complexity of muscle impairment in chronic neck pain. Man Ther.
2004;9:125–133.
58. Treleaven J. Sensorimotor disturbances in neck disorders affecting postural stability, head and eye
movement control. Man Ther. 2008;13:2–11
59. Michaelson P, Michaelson M, Jaric S, Latash ML, Sjolander P, Djupsjobacka M. Vertical posture
and head stability in patients with chronic neck pain. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35:229–235
60. iield S, Treleaven J, Jull G. Standing balance: a comparison between idiopathic and whiplash-
induced neck pain. Man Ther. 2008;13:183–191.
61. Roijezon U. Sensorimotor function in chronic neck pain: objective assessments and a novel method
for neck coordination exercise. Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN. 2009. 0346-6612; 1273;
62. Burgess-Limerick R, Plooy A, Ankrum DR. The effect of imposed and self-selected computer monitor
height on posture and gaze angle. Clinical of Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 1998;13:584–592.\
63. Silva AG, Punt TD, Sharples P, Vilas-Boas JP, Johnson MI. Head posture and neck pain of chronic
non traumatic origin: a comparison between patients and pain-free persons. Archives of Physical
Medicine Rehabilitation 2009;90:669–674.
64. Griegel-Morris P, Larson K, Mueller-Klaus K, Oatis CA. Incidence of common postural
abnormalities in the cervical, shoulder and thoracic regions and their association with pain in two
age groups of healthy subjects. Physical Therapy Journal 1992;72:425–431
65. O'Sullivan PB. Lumbar segmental 'instability': clinical presentation and specific stabilizing exercise
management. Manual Therapy 2000;5(1):2–12.
66. Jull G, Falla D, Treleaven J, Hodges P, Vicenzino B. Retraining cervical joint position sense: the
effect of two exercise regimes. Journal of Orthopedic Research 2007;25(3):404–412.
67. Falla D, Jull G, Hodges P, Vicenzino B. An endurance-strength training regime is effective in
reducing myoelectric manifestations of cervical flexor muscle fatigue in females with chronic neck

38
Scientific Research Journal of India ● Volume: 3, Issue: 1, Year: 2014

pain. Clinical Neurophysiological journal. 2006;117(4):828–837

68. Hayden J, van Tulder MW, Malmivaara A, Koes BW (2010) Exercise therapy for treatment of non-
specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Systemic Review.
69. Henchoz Y, Kai-Lik So A. Exercise and nonspecific low back pain: a literature review. Joint Bone
Spine. 2008;75:533–539
70. Jensen I. Neck pain. Best Pract Res Clinical Rheumatological Disorders. 2007;21:93–108
71. Liddle SD, Baxter GD, Gracey JH. Exercise and chronic low back pain: what works? Pain.
2004;107:176–190.
72. Cote P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L. The factors associated with neck pain and its related disability in the
Saskatchewan population. Spine. 2000;25(9):1109–1117.
73. Aromaa A, Koskinen S. Health and functional capacity in Finland: Baseline results of the health 2000
health examination survey
74. Bovim G, Schrader H, Sand T. Neck pain in the general population. Spine. 1994;19(12):1307–1309
75. Guez M, Hildingsson C, Nilsson M, Toolanen G. The prevalence of neck pain: a population-based
study from northern Sweden. Acta Orthopedic Scand. 2002;73(4):455–459
76. Hermann KM, Reese CS. Relationships among selected measures of impairment, functional limitation,
and disability in patients with cervical spine disorders. Physical Therapy 2001;81(3):903–914
77. Saarni SI, Harkanen T, Sintonen H, Suvisaari J, Koskinen S, Aromaa A, Lonnqvist J. The impact of 29
chronic conditions on health-related quality of life: a general population survey in Finland using 15D
and EQ-5D. Qualitative Life Resources. 2006;15(8):1403–1414
78. Barton PM, Hayes KC. Neck flexor muscle strength, efficiency, and relaxation times in normal
subjects and subjects with unilateral neck pain and headache. Archives of Physical & Medical
Rehabilitation. 1996;77(7):680–687
79. Chiu TT, Sing KL. Evaluation of cervical range of motion and isometric neck muscle strength:
reliability and validity. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2002;16(8):851–858
80. Jordan A, Mehlsen J, Ostergaard K. A comparison of physical characteristics between patients
seeking treatment for neck pain and age-matched healthy people. J Manipulative Physical Therapy
1997;20(7):468–475
81. Krout RM, Anderson TP. Role of anterior cervical muscles in production of neck pain. Archves of
Physical & Medical Rehabilitation 1966;47(9):603–611
82. Silverman JL, Rodriquez AA, Agre JC. Quantitative cervical flexor strength in healthy subjects and in
subjects with mechanical neck pain. Archives of Physical & Medical Rehabilitation 1991;72(9):679–
681.
83. Vernon H, Mior S; The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity; Journal of
Manipulative Physiological Therapy 1992 Jan;15(1)
84. Cynthia J Watson and Margaret Schenkman; Physical Therapy Management of Isolated Serratus
Anterior Muscle Paralysis PHYSICAL THERAPY;1995; 75:194-202.
85. Adaptation of muscle to prolonged length changes; Biomechanics of skeletal muscles;
Biomechanical Principles 61-62.
86. J. L. Andersen, P. Aagaard; Effects of strength training on muscle fiber types and
87. size; consequences for athletes trail for high- intensity sport; Scandinavian Journal of Medical
Science& Sports 2010: 20(5)
88. Rebecca Booth ;The physiological effects of stretching; Stretch Receptors, Stretch Reflex;4-7.
89. Richa Mahajan,Chita Kataria, Kshitija Bansal;Compaitive effectiveness of Muscle Energy technique
and static stretching for subacute mechanical neck pain;International journal of health and related
sciences, vol 1(1)17-21
90. Parmar S, Shyam A, Sabnis S, Sancheti P. The effect of isolytic contraction and passive manual
stretching on pain and knee range of motion after hip surgery: A prospective, double-blinded,
randomized study. Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal 2011; 29:25-30.
91. Nora Corbett; Treatment based classification approach to neck pain.

CORRESPONDENCE

* MPT (Musculoskeletal), Principal, Santosh Medical College and Hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh
** Student MPT (Musculoskeletal), Santosh Medical College and Hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh

39
ISSN: 2277-1700 ● Website: http://srji.drkrishna.co.in ● URL Forwarded to: http://sites.google.com/site/scientificrji

*** MPT (Neurology), Assistant Professor, Santosh Medical College and Hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar
Pradesh.
**** MPT (Musculoskeletal), Assistant Professor, Santosh Medical College and Hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar
Pradesh.

40

You might also like