Physics Project File
Physics Project File
1. Certificate 3
2. Acknowledgement 4
7. Combination of Errors 13
11. Bibliography 23
Certificate
This is to certify that project entitled “Errors and Significant
Figures” has been prepared by Shashank Kumar of Class XIth A4
of Kanha Makhan Public School. He has submitted this project
during the academic year 2021-2022 under my guidance
and supervision.
Proper care should be taken in reading, recording the data. Also, the
calculation of error should be done accurately.
By increasing the number of experimenters, we can reduce the gross
errors. If each experimenter takes different reading at different points, then
by taking the average of more readings we can reduce the gross errors.
Random Error-
The random errors are those errors, which occur irregularly and hence are
random. These can arise due to random and unpredictable fluctuations in
experimental conditions (Example: unpredictable fluctuations in
temperature, voltage supply, mechanical vibrations of experimental set-ups,
etc, errors by the observer taking readings, etc. For example, when the same
person repeats the same observation, it is very likely that he may get different
readings every time.
Systematic Error-
Systematic errors are reproducible inaccuracies that are consistently in the
same direction. These errors are difficult to detect and cannot be analyzed
statistically. If a systematic error is identified when calibrating against a
standard, applying a correction or correction factor to compensate for the
effect can reduce the bias. Unlike random errors, systematic errors cannot be
detected or reduced by increasing the number of observations.
Causes of Errors
Incomplete definition – (May be systematic or random) — One reason that it
is impossible to make exact measurements is that the measurement is not
always clearly defined. For example, if two different people measure the
length of the same string, they would probably get different results because
each person may stretch the string with a different tension. The best way to
minimize definition errors is to carefully consider and specify the conditions
that could affect the measurement.
Failure to account for a factor- (usually systematic) — The most challenging
part of designing an experiment is trying to control or account for all
possible factors except the one independent variable that is being analyzed.
For instance, you may inadvertently ignore air resistance when measuring
free-fall acceleration or you may fail to account for the effect of the Earth's
magnetic field when measuring the field near a small magnet. The best way
to account for these sources of error is to brainstorm with your peers about
all the factors that could possibly affect your result. This brainstorm should
be done before beginning the experiment in order to plan and account for
the confounding factors before taking data. Sometimes a correction can be
applied to a result after taking data to account for an error that was not
detected earlier.
Environmental factors- (systematic or random) — be aware of errors
introduced by your immediate working environment. You may need to take
account for or protect your experiment from vibrations, drafts, changes in
temperature, and electronic noise or other effects from nearby apparatus.
Instrument resolution - (random) — all instruments have finite precision
that limits the ability to resolve small measurement differences. For instance,
a meter stick cannot be used to distinguish distances to a precision much
better than about half of its smallest scale division (0.5 mm in this case). One
of the best ways to obtain more precise measurements is to use a null
difference method instead of measure a quantity
directly. Null or balance methods involve using instrumentation to measure
the difference between two similar quantities, one of which is known very
accurately and is adjustable. The adjustable reference quantity is varied until
the difference is reduced to zero. The two quantities are then balanced and
the magnitude of the unknown quantity can be found by comparison with a
measurement standard. With this method, problems of source instability are
eliminated, and the measuring instrument can be very sensitive and does not
even need a scale.
Calibration - (systematic) — whenever possible, the calibration of an
instrument should be checked before taking data. If a calibration standard is
not available, the accuracy of the instrument should be checked by
comparing with another instrument that is at least as precise, or by
consulting the technical data provided by the manufacturer. Calibration
errors are usually linear (measured as a fraction of the full scale reading), so
that larger values result in greater absolute errors.
Zero offset - (systematic) — when making a measurement with a
micrometer caliper, electronic balance, or electrical meter; always check the
zero reading first. Re-zero the instrument if possible, or at least measure and
record the zero offset so that readings can be corrected later. It is also a good
idea to check the zero reading throughout the experiment. Failure to zero a
device will result in a constant error that is more significant for smaller
measured values than for larger ones.
Physical variations - (random) — it is always wise to obtain multiple
measurements over the widest range possible. Doing so often reveals
variations that might otherwise go undetected. These variations may call for
closer examination, or they may be combined to find an average value.
Parallax – (gross) — this error can occur whenever there is some distance
between the measuring scale and the indicator used to obtain a
measurement. If the observer's eye is not squarely aligned with the pointer
and scale, the reading may be too high or low (some analog meters have
mirrors to help with this alignment).
Instrument drift - (systematic) — most electronic instruments have readings
that drift over time. The amount of drift is generally not a concern, but
occasionally this source of error can be significant.
Personal errors - These come from carelessness, poor technique, or bias on
the part of the experimenter. The experimenter may measure incorrectly, or
may use poor technique in taking a measurement, or may introduce a bias
into measurements by expecting (and inadvertently forcing) the results to
agree with the expected outcome.
Errors In Measurement
Error for a single measurement –
The uncertainty of a single measurement is limited by the precision and
accuracy of the measuring instrument, along with any other factors that
might affect the ability of the experimenter to make the measurement.
For example, if you are trying to use a meter stick to measure the
diameter of a tennis ball, the uncertainty might be ± 5 mm, but if you used a
vernier caliper, the uncertainty could be reduced to maybe ±2 mm. The
limiting factor with the meter stick is parallax, while the second case is
limited by ambiguity in the definition of the tennis ball's diameter (it's fuzzy!).
In both of these cases, the uncertainty is greater than the smallest divisions
marked on the measuring tool (likely 1 mm and 0.05 mm respectively).
Unfortunately, there is no general rule for determining the uncertainty in all
measurements. The experimenter is the one who can best evaluate and
quantify the uncertainty of a measurement based on all the possible factors
that affect the result. Therefore, the person making the measurement has the
obligation to make the best judgment possible and report the uncertainty in a
way that clearly explains what the uncertainty represents:
Measurement = (measured value ± standard error)
Example: Diameter of tennis ball = 6.7 ± 0.2 cm.
Error in series of measurement –
Combination of errors
If a quantity depends on two or more other quantities, the combination of
errors in the two quantities helps to determine and predict the errors in the
resultant quantity. There are several procedures for this.
Suppose two quantities A and B have values as A ± ΔA and B ± ΔB. Z is
the result and ΔZ is the error due to combination of A and B.
Raised to the
Criteria Sum or Difference Product
power
k
Resultant value Z Z = A±B Z = AB Z=A
Z±ΔZ = (A±ΔA) + Z±ΔZ = (A±ΔA) +
Result with error Z±ΔZ =(A±ΔA)k
(B±ΔB) (B±ΔB)
Resultant error ΔZ/Z = ΔA/A +
±ΔZ = ±ΔA±ΔB ΔZ/Z = k(ΔA/A)
range ΔB/B
ΔZ/Z = ΔA/A +
Maximum error ΔZ = ΔA + ΔB ΔZ/Z = k(ΔA/A)
ΔB/B
Sum of absolute Sum of relative k times relative
Error
errors errors error
Significant Figures
Significant figures can be defined as important numbers between 0 and 9 that
are used in the coefficient of an expression that explains the precision of the
expression. These figures are obtained by rounding off the expression after the
calculations are executed on them.
1.324*106 4
1,324,000.000
132400000*106 9
6.75*10-5 3
0.00006750000
6750000*10-5 7
-1*10-8 1
0.0000000100
-1.00*10-8 3
Rules for Arithmetic Operations of
Significant Figures
Addition and Subtraction –
The result is rounded off to the last common digit occurring furthest to the
right in all components. Another way to state this rule is as follows: in
addition and subtraction, the result is rounded off so that it has the same
number of digits as the measurement having the fewest decimal places
(counting from left to right). For example,
200 (assume 3 significant figures) + 69.693 (5 significant figures) = 269.693
Which should be rounded to 269 (3 significant figures). Note, however, that
it is possible two numbers have no common digits (significant figures in the
same digit column).
13.214 + 234.6 + 7.0350 + 6.38 = 261.2290
We can see that the second number, 234.6, is only accurate to the tenths
place; all the other numbers are accurate to a greater number of decimal
places. Complying with the rule of the weakest link, the answer should be
rounded to the tenth place. We get,
13.214 + 234.6 + 7.0350 + 6.38 = 261.2
Multiplication and Division –
Let’s see how to perform multiplication and division by keeping significant
figures. The multiplication is performed normally and the decimal points are
all noted down. The rule of the weakest link also extends to the
multiplication of significant figures. In both multiplication and division, the
result should be rounded off to have the same number of significant figures
as the component with the least number of significant figures.
16.235 × 0.217 × 5 = 17.614975
Since the component with the lowest number of significant digits has only
one significant digit, we will need to round 17.614975 to 20 which is the
nearest answer with one significant digit. Another example is,
0.00435 × 4.6 = 0.02001
4.6 here has only 2 significant digits, we will round 0.02001 to two
significant digits. From this, we get,
0.00435 × 4.6 = 0.020
0.02 here is not the right answer, because 0.02 has only one significant digit;
namely, the “2”. The trailing zero in 0.020 indicates that “this is accurate to
the thousandths place, or two significant digits”, and is necessary to complete
the answer.
How To Reduce Errors In Measurement
Keeping an eye on the procedure and following below listed points can help
to reduce the error.