PSYA02 Full Book Notes
PSYA02 Full Book Notes
● Measuring Intelligence
○ Focus Questions:
■ How have intelligence tests been misused in modern society?
■ Why do we have the types of intelligence tests that we have?
○ Leilani Muir: forced to be sterilized due to low IQ score
○ Different Approaches to Intelligence Testing
■ What IS intelligence? Is it getting good grades?
■ Intelligence and Perception: Galton’s Anthropometric Approach
● Galton believed that because people learn about the world
through their senses, those with superior sensory abilities would
surely be more intelligent
● He created a set of tests around this idea
○ Anthropometrics: methods of measuring physical and
mental variation in humans
● Cattell took Galton’s tests and administered them to university
students
○ He found that the different sensory test scores were not
correlated with each other
■ Some people have better hearing than eyesight
○ He found that scores on the sensory tests were not
correlated with their university abilities
○ Because of this, the approach was scrapped.
■ Intelligence and Thinking: the Stanford Binet Test
● Binet argued that intelligence should be indicated by more
complex thinking processes, such as memory, attention, and
comprehension
● Intelligence: the ability to think, understand, reason, and adapt to
or overcome obstacles
● Binet and Simon developed a test to determine the abilities of
children who might benefit from special education
● Binet believed that a child’s test score measured her mental age
○ Mental age: the average intellectual ability score for
children of a specific age
● Terman described the Stanford-Binet test (a test adapted for the
US) as a test intended to measure innate levels of intelligence
○ Binet’s intent was not this, and this is a pretty substantial
difference
● Terman and Stern ended up developing IQ, which took mental age
and divided it by chronological age, on a 100 point average scale.
●Take the difference between:
○ Mental age of 7, 3 years behind others
○ IQ of 70, 30 points below average
● Also, this approach makes no sense when considering adults
● Deviation IQ: taken average test scores of people of the same
age, with the average being set at 100
■ Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale
● Offers a Full Scale IQ, General Ability Index (GAI) and Cognitive
Proficiency Index (CPI)
■ Raven’s Progressive Matrices
● Developed to correct a cultural bias in intelligence tests
● Relies on visual pattern identification
○ The Chequered Past of Intelligence Testing
■ IQ and the Eugenics Movement
● Eugenics was all the rage and assumed that White Westerners
were genetically superior, justifying their imposition of their values
on other cultures
● Social Darwinism grew into eugenics
○ Galton coined this term and believed intelligence to be an
innate property
○ He believed that eminence in families was a result of good
genetics, explaining why wealth and other achievements
concentrated in a few families
● These ideas, as well as the results of Native American, Mexican,
and Black people’s tests, justified stratifying them into a lower
social class… and eventually sterilizing them
■ The Race and IQ Controversy
● Different ethnic groups have differences in average IQ scores
○ Asians and Jews were at the top, with Latinos and Blacks
at the bottom
● Example: “The Bell Curve” which presented the research and
argued that affirmative action programs were unnecessary, and
that a meritocratic society was most healthy (with the high merit
individuals at the top and the low merit individuals at the bottom)
● There’s a large amount of controversy due to this
■ Problems with the Racial Superiority Interpretation
● Despite the work to de-bias standardized tests, the differences in
racial and ethnic groups remained
● A few explanations:
○ Some groups are more exposed to standardized tests than
others
○ Some groups have a higher motivation to do well
○ Some groups have more in common with test
administrators
● Stereotype threat: occurs when negative stereotypes about a
group cause group members to underperform on ability tests
○ Increases negative arousal which undermines test
performance
○ Causes people to become more self focused
○ Increases the tendency to actively try to inhibit negative
thoughts, altering cognitive resources
● There are problems with both the validity of the scores and the
interpretation of the findings
● Working the Model
○ What do we know about the kinds of beliefs that may affect
test scores?
■ Children’s perceptions of their mental abilities have
a very strong influence on their academic
performance
■ Entity theory: the belief that intelligence is a fixed
characteristic and hard to change
■ Incremental theory: the belief that intelligence can
be shaped by experiences, practice, and effort
○ How can science test whether beliefs affect performance?
■ Dweck tested students, each in groups (entity
theory vs. incremental theory) and gave them a 476
question exam
■ They got immediate feedback as to whether each
question was correct
■ Those who held entity beliefs were more likely to
give up, while those who held incremental beliefs
were less likely to do so
■ They also tested teaching incremental theory to
kids. This group’s grades increased.
○ Can we critically evaluate this research?
■ What if, in some situations, it’s true that the task is
impossible no matter how hard they try?
○ Why is this relevant?
■ School grades have become increasingly important
■ People can see better outcomes often by changing
the way they think about their own intelligence
● Understanding Intelligence
○ Focus Questions:
■ Is intelligence one ability, or many?
■ How have psychologists attempted to explain intelligence as a collection
of different abilities?
○ Most people believe that intelligences involves the ability to think, understand,
reason, learn, and find solutions to problems: but how to do they relate?
○ Intelligence as a Single, General Ability
■ We used factor analysis to compare different aspects of intelligence and
look at how well they correlate with each other
■ Spearman’s General Intelligence
● General intelligence factor: a constant (g) representing a person’s
abilities
● Is it real? What does it predict?
○ It reasonably predicts GPA, with a correlation (rho) of
about .5
○ It also predicts how many years a person will stay in
school, as well as their income.
○ It predicts other seemingly unrelated phenomena, such as
life expectancy, quickness of snap judgments during
discrimination tasks, and self-control
● General intelligence factor correlates with job performance better
than any other predictor (.53)
● It also predicts how efficiently we conduct impulses along nerve
fibers and across synapses
○ Brains of the highly intelligent don’t have to work as hard.
There’s less brain activation for the same task.
■ Does g tell us the whole story?
● It reflects something real but correlation isn’t everything.
● It may reflect motivation, or other factors
● It also cannot capture the kind of genius that a savant like Rain
Man has
● It cannot capture the wide range of human abilities, either.
○ Many people would, at the same time, admit that Kanye is
both smarter than them and not so.
○ Intelligence as Multiple, Specific Abilities
■ The Problem with g
● One problem with g that Spearman noticed is that not all items on
the test correlated with each other all that well
● He hypothesized a second, skill-based intelligence: s
● We cannot deny that you need to hone a skill, like a sword, in
order for it to be sharp. However, g is problematic for some.
● Thurstone came up with 7 clusters of primary mental abilities, and
that there was no singular meaningful g
● Turns out, both Spearman and Thurstone were right
■ The Hierarchical Model of Intelligence
● Some types of intelligence seem to be nested together
● We have a ‘general’ intelligence which affects everything, and
sub-intelligences that affect specific abilities
● Many theories arose from this idea
● Working the Model
○ What do we know about fluid and crystallized intelligence?
■ Fluid intelligence (Gf): a type of intelligence used in
learning new information and solving new problems
not based on previously attained knowledge
● Solving geometric puzzles, such as Raven’s
progressive matrices
■ Crystallized intelligence (Gc): a type of intelligence
that draws upon past learning and experience
● Vocabulary, general knowledge, even the
ability to do a job
■ They’re largely separate
■ Greater Gf may lead to greater Gc… but this isn’t
proven.
○ How can science help distinguish between fluid and
crystallized intelligence?
■ One study of people 20-89 were given a bunch of
tasks
■ Researchers found that task performance that
require Gf peaks in early to middle adulthood and
declines thereafter.. as well as that Gf peaks in
adolescence then declines.
■ Functioning of brain regions associated with Gf
declines sooner than the functioning of those
supporting Gc (prefrontal cortex)
○ Can we critically evaluate crystallized and fluid
intelligence?
■ Is fluid intelligence real? We’re unsure: it may just
be a result of correlation between other shit
■ Fluid and crystallized intelligence are not entirely
separable
● You will need both to learn, for example, a
card game
○ Why is this relevant?
■ Helps reduce stereotypes and expectations about
intelligence in older people
■ Sternberg’s Triarchic Theory of Intelligence
● Triarchic theory of intelligence: a theory that divides intelligence
into three distinct types: analytical, practical, and creative
● Analytical intelligence: book smarts - how to reason logically
through a problem and find solutions
● Practical intelligence: street smarts - how to find solutions to real
world problems encountered in daily life
● Creative intelligence: the ability to create new ideas and generate
novel solutions to problems
■ Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences
● Inspired by savants, who had amazing abilities in limited domains
and limited abilities in others (as well as low g)
● Verbal/linguistic intelligence
● Logical/mathematical intelligence
● Visuospatial intelligence
● Bodily/kinesthetic intelligence
● Musical/rhythmical intelligence
● Interpersonal intelligence
● Self/intrapersonal intelligence
● Naturalist intelligence
● Existential intelligence
● Overall, this is hard to test because measurement scales do not
accurately capture this information
○ The Battle of the Sexes
■ There’s no difference in average intelligence between the sexes
■ Males have a greater variability in IQ scores
■ Males tend to have a larger percentage of the upper echelon of math test
takers
● Seems to be a result of an unintentional selection bias
■ Do Males and Females have Unique Cognitive Skills?
● Females seem to be better at verbal abilities, memory tasks, and
the ability to read emotions
● Males seem to be better at visuospatial tasks
● The underrepresentation of females in STEM may be a result of
this, but is more likely a result of stereotype threat
● Biological, Environmental and Behavioral Influences on Intelligence
○ Focus Questions:
■ Which biological and environmental factors have been found to be
important contributors to intelligence?
■ Is it possible for people to enhance their own intelligence?
○ Biological Influences on Intelligence
■ The Genetics of Intelligence: Twin and Adoption Studies
● Genetic similarity does contribute to intelligence test scores
● Identical twin scores correlate at about .85, much higher than
fraternal twins
○ .80 when raised in different homes
● This is the same as testing twice
■ The Heritability of Intelligence
● Seems to be between 40% and 80%
● A heritability estimate describes how much of the differences
between people in the sample can be accounted for by differences
in their genes
○ This means it depends on the amount of people being
studied
○ If people in a sample inhabit highly similar environments,
the heritability will be higher
● Comparing within a sample of wealthy individuals, most of the
differences can be found to be genetic.
○ Not so comparing wealthy vs. poor, or even within a
sample of poor individuals.
● This causes problems, as genes do not operate in isolation from
the environment
○ Epigenetics: changes in genetic expression
● Genes that influence intelligence may do so indirectly
■ Behavioral Genomics
● Behavioral genomics: a technique that examines how specific
genes interact with the environment to influence behaviors
● Intelligence can, on some level, be predicted based on a collection
of genes that pool together.
● These genes have a small effect by themselves… except in cases
of genes that could signal mental retardation.
● Gene knockout studies: involve removing a specific gene and
comparing the characteristics of animals with and without that
gene
○ They can do the opposite as well
● Example: Doogie mice
○ Created by manipulating the gene NR2B, which encodes
the NMDA receptor.
■ This receptor plays a crucial role in learning and
memory
○ Mice with altered NR2B learned significantly faster and had
better memories than other mice
● How do these effects occur?
● Working the Model
○ What do we know about brain size and intelligence?
■ Bigger brains were thought to be linked to higher
intelligence, and used as justification for white
supremacy
○ How can science explain the relationship between brain
size and intelligence?
■ 36% of the variation in verbal intelligence scores
was accounted for by the size of the brain
■ Did not account significantly for any of the other
component of intelligence
■ However, the convolutions of the brain account for
25% of the variability in the scores on the WAIS
○ Can we critically evaluate this issue?
■ We’re not 100% sure what is being tested
■ Third-variable problem
○ Why is this relevant?
■ Gives us insight into the effects of anorexia nervosa
or alcohol abuse
○ Environmental Influences on Intelligence
■ Rats in enriched environments has a 5% larger brain and their cortices
contained 25% more synapses
■ Birth Order
● Oldest children had, on average, 3 higher IQ points than the 2nd
child and 4 higher IQ points than the 3rd
● Likely due to the fact that the oldest children share their wisdom,
reinforcing and processing the information differently
■ Socioeconomic Status
● Children in wealthy homes have higher IQs than those living in
poorer homes
● High SES homes:
○ have higher vocabularies
○ talk to the children more
○ read to them more
■ Nutrition
● Diets like the typical Western diets cause kids to have lower IQ
scores on average
● Higher IQ scores result in eating foods low in saturated fats, high
in omega-3 fats, whole grains, fruits and veggies
■ Stress
● Interferes with working memory and self-control due to the release
of cortisol
■ Education
● Attending school has a large impact on IQ scores
■ The Flynn Effect: Is Everyone Getting Smarter?
● Flynn Effect: the steady population level increases in IQ scores
over time
● Likely due to the requirement of certain intellectual skills in modern
society
○ Behavioral Influences on Intelligence
■ Brain Training Programs
● The N-back task actually improved IQ scores as well as skill at the
task
■ Nootropic Drugs
● Ritalin (methylphenidate)
○ Inhibits the reuptake of norepinephrine and dopamine
● Modafinil
○ Boosts short-term memory and planning abilities by
affecting the reuptake of dopamine
● Could cause dependency issues as well as promoting the belief
that these drugs need to be taken in order to stay competitive
■ Meditation
● Going on a ten-day mindfulness retreat has been shown to
improve working memory
● Mindfulness meditation increases the thickness and denisty of the
white-matter pathways connecting the anterior cingulate gyrus to
other brain regions