Alive Human Body Detection System Using An Mobile Autonomous Robot
Alive Human Body Detection System Using An Mobile Autonomous Robot
Abstract— In this paper, a new approach for detecting alive life and property various essential services (like fire
humans in destructed environments using an autonomous brigades, medical and paramedical personnel, police) are
robot is proposed. Human detection in an unmanned area deployed. Some lose their lives because of not being
can be done only by an automated system. Alive human treated at time. According to the field of Urban Search
body detection system proposed a monitoring system using
and Rescue (USAR), the probability of saving a victim is
ultrasonic sensors and camera to record, transmit and
analyze conditions of human body. The task of identify high within the first 48 hours of the rescue operation,
human being in rescue operations is difficult for the robotic after that, the probability becomes nearly zero. Generally,
agent but it is simple for the human agent. In order to detect Rescue People cannot enter into some parts / places of the
a human body, an autonomous robot must be equipped with war field or in the earth quake affected areas. All of these
a specific set of sensors that provide information about the tasks are performed mostly by human and trained dogs,
presence of a person in the environment around. This work often in very dangerous and risky situations. To avoid
describes an autonomous robot for rescue operations. The such losses, a robotic system can perform well for
proposed system uses an ultrasonic sensor in order to detect providing alert (detection) of human being.
the existence of living humans and a low-cost camera in
order to acquire a video of the scene as needed. Additional,
other sensors include temperature, fire and metal detector The main purpose of the robot is to detect alive human
works as bomb sensor to detect the presence of bomb in beings after the occurrence of natural calamities with the
Warfield and in rescue operations. Having detected a sign of help of Ultrasonic sensor. The robot based system will
a living human, the ultrasonic sensor Triggers the camera to sense the radiation of human being and condition the
show live scene. The video is then displayed on the screen. sensed signal to communicate to the control section of
This approach requires a relatively small number of data to this robot. Based on the responded commands the robot
be acquired and processed during the rescue operation. This will react upon. The rescuer may become a victim who
way, the real-time cost of processing and data transmission needs to be rescued. This is why since some years mobile
is considerably reduced. This system has the potential to
robots have been proposed to help them and to perform
achieve high performance in detecting alive humans in
devastated environments relatively quickly and cost- tasks that neither human, dogs nor existing tools can do.
effectively. The detection depending on a number of factors For this project, we will focus only on robots which will
such as the body position and the light intensity of the scene. work in a disaster environment of manmade. The
Results show that the system provides an efficient way to proposed system uses an ultrasonic sensor in order to
track human motion. The aim of this article is to present our detect the existence of living humans and a low-cost
experience with various sensors designed and developed. camera in order to capture video of the scene as needed.
Having detected a sign of a living human, the ultrasonic
Keywords-Autonomous mobile robot, Human Detection, sensor triggers a camera to capture a video of the scene.
Motion Detection, Mobile Robot, Navigation, Rescue,
Robotics, ultrasonic sensor, Urban Search and Rescue.
The simulated robot is assumed to have the capability to
determine its current location in real-time, to wirelessly
communicate with the rescue team, and to locally store
I. INTRODUCTION the status and location information about the trapped
Disasters can disrupt economic and social balance of the victims in case the wireless communications link is
society. Natural disasters occur frequently nowadays. temporarily disconnected.
Many human beings are victims of such occurrences.
Because of high rise buildings and other manmade While detecting human being, there may be some
structures urban and industrial areas can be consider to be obstacle on the way of robot. In order to identify the
more susceptible to disasters. These disasters can be obstacle and to have an alternate path to perform its
categorized into natural and human induced disasters. defined task an ultrasonic detection is used which
Natural disasters include floods, storms, cyclones, effectively fulfills this operation.
bushfires and earthquakes where as besides natural Traditionally, equipped robots faced a lot of problems:
disasters, the urban environment is prone to human i) A very high communication cost was incurred due to
induced disasters such as transportation accidents, the large number of transmitted images to the operator.
industrial accidents and major fires. During such ii) More than 25% of the communications between
calamities, especially disasters, in order to prevent loss of Wireless robot and the control unit was extremely noisy
and therefore was useless. This eventually led to a loss of the scene were acquired and subtracted from each other to
communication between the robots and the operator. As a discover if a motion has occurred. The used technique
result, the robots stopped working totally. was fairly efficient in detecting the victims. However, the
iii) A very high processing cost is also incurred by the robot was not fully autonomous and was dependent on
Capturing, storing, and transmitting a large number of the operator.
images.
iv) Third, there was a continuous need for illumination Gas analysis based bio-sensors [6] CO2 sensors allow
due to the dark nature of these environments. This to detect the carbon dioxide emission, and even the
requires a relatively large power supply, which is not breathing cycle of a victim. It is thus possible to
feasible in such situations. determine if he is still alive but the disadvantage is that
the response time of a CO2 sensor is very slow and that
the sensor has to be very close to the victim to have
II. RELATED WORK useful data because it is very directional and depends
In this section, a brief discussion of some of the related much on the air conditions like humidity, temperature,
work is presented; focusing on the used approach and its wind, and dust. This makes it difficult to use it in a
advantages and disadvantages. Remote Operated and disaster area so this approach was not pursued in this
Controlled Hexapod (ROACH): [12] ROACH is a six project. Like the CO2 sensor, SpO2 is used to determine
legged design that provides significant advantages in if somebody is still alive. It needs direct contact with the
mobility over wheeled and tracked designs. It is equipped person. SpO2 sensing of blood oxygen content requires
with predefined walking gaits, cameras which transmit only the pressing of a small, cool, red light on any bare
live audio and videos of the disaster site, as well as inch of skin. It is not a common sensor in robotics. This is
information about locations of objects with respect to the not a commercially available sensor.
robot’s position to the interface on the laptop. Kohga:
University of Tokyo - The most complicated task for Greer, Kerrow, & Abrantes 2002, [9] represented a
most of the USAR robots has been working on a rough thorough understanding of the urban disaster environment
terrain. Specialized robots have been designed for these and an appreciation for traditional search and rescue
types of environments such as KOHGA the snake like techniques are crucial to determining the success of a
robot. The robot is constructed by connecting multiple hovering robot solution. In this paper search and rescue
crawler vehicles serially, resulting in a long and thin environment is described, the applications of robots in
structure so that it can enter narrow space. urban search and rescue, an outline of robotic
competitions in simulating a real rescue environment is
Quality work has been done in the field of robotics. described.
These robots came into existence in the early 21st century
but since then enormous improvements have been made Bahadori [16] presents an analysis of techniques that
in the concept, design owing to which their capabilities have been studied in the recent years for human body
have improved significantly. Various rescue robots have detection (HBD) via visual information. The focus of this
been developed and some of these are – CRASAR work is on developing image processing routines for
(Centre for Robot-Assisted Search and Rescue): autonomous robots operating for detecting victims in
University of South Florida. This robot[10] was used for rescue environments. The paper both discusses problems
first time in real conditions on 11th September 2001 in arising in human body detection from visual information
the World Trade Centre disaster. Different sensors like and describes the methods that are more adequate to be
millimetre wave radar for measuring distance, a colour applied in a rescue scenario. Finally, some preliminary
CCD camera for vision and a forward-looking infrared experiments for such methods in recognizing rescue
camera for the human heat detection are used in it. victims are reported.
Pissokas [1] describe the social impact of urban
Burion [6] presented a project that aims to provide a devastations has given rise to the field of Urban Search
sensor suite for human detection for the USAR robots. and Rescue Robotics. The aim of this article is to present
This study evaluated several types of sensors for our experience and experimental results with various
detecting humans such as pyroelectric sensor, USB sensors designed and developed.
camera, microphone, and IR camera. The pyroelectric
sensor was used to detect the human body radiation, but III. BLOCK DIAGRAM
its limitation was its binary output. The USB camera was As shown in fig 1. This system consists of transmitter and
used for motion detection, but its limitation was its receiver unit. Furthermore transmitter unit consist of
sensitivity to changes in light intensity. The microphone rotational unit which has a specific set of sensors mount
was used for long duration and high amplitude sound on it and a microcontroller. Receiver unit consist of
detection, but it was severely affected by noise. Lastly, camera which gets activated and starts capturing images
the IR camera was used to detect humans by their heat as soon as ultrasonic sensor detects motion of human
image, but it was affected by other nearby hot objects. being and buzzer gets a beep and there is also an LCD
The main idea was to detect a change in the image scene which is used to display the temperature, motion and
by checking the values of the pixels. Several images for metal detection.
be changed by making necessary changes in the program
developed.
Start
Navigate
Ultrasonic sensor
checks for Motion
No
Ultrasonic signal?
Others sensors
Yes gets activated
V. HARDWARE RESULTS
Manually Capturing is started
In order to simulate the robot, a laptop used T.V Tune
Card as well as LCD to display data interfaced wirelessly
to the Robot mechanism. A Robot is equipped with
following sensors and camera: No
Human
i) Bomb (Metal) sensor to detect the presence of Detected? Yes
suspected material in Rescue operations.
ii) An ultrasonic sensor to detect human motion and
obstacles come in the way of Robot. Yes
iii) Temperature and fire sensor to measure temperatures
and display them on LCD in the form of three states Send location and information to rescue team
High, Low and Medium.
iv)Camera to record and display data when sensor
triggers it.
According to the hardware developed, the buzzer beeps Done
as soon as ultrasonic sensor detects motion. The robocar
which otherwise follows a particular pattern stops for 8-
Stop
10 seconds as soon as motion is detected. After some
delay when there is no motion the robocar again follows
the same pattern. The pattern which robocar follows can Fig 2. Flow chart of the Developed System
A. Circuit Diagram of Transmitter unit using
ORCAD
B. Circuit Diagram of Receiver unit using ORCAD VI. TRANSMITTER END PROTOCOL
Hurdle Detected……………..P2.1 (Active high)
Metal Detected……………….P2.0 (Active low)
Temperature sensor
Limit 1 ……………………….P2.2
Limit 2 ………………………..P2.3 Both are active high
RF sending
10 P3.0
11 P3.1
12 P3.2
13 P3.3
H-Bridge
14 P3.4
15 P3.5… p (pins) All are connected to MCUunit
16 P3.6
17 P3.7
Relay P1.0
Fig. 4 Receiver Circuit Diagram LED P 1.1
Protocol
HARDWARE DEVELOPED D3 D 2 D 1 D 0
0 0 Temp. Low
0 1 Medium………………..L1
1 0 Hot temperature……….L2
0 No hurdle
1 Motion Detected
0 No metal
1 Metal detected