UVC Handook 1 - 13
UVC Handook 1 - 13
Wladyslaw Kowalski
Ultraviolet Germicidal
Irradiation Handbook
123
Wladyslaw Kowalski
Immune Building Systems, Inc.
575 Madison Ave.
New York, NY 10022
[email protected]
vii
Acknowledgements
ix
Contents
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation (UVGI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Brief History of Ultraviolet Disinfection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3 Units and Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.4 Air vs. Water Disinfection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.5 Surface Disinfection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.6 Air Disinfection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.7 Air Disinfection Field Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.8 Pathogens and Allergens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.9 Current Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1.10 UVGI and the Future of Disease Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
xi
xii Contents
4 UV Rate Constants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
4.2 Rate Constants and Survival Curves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
4.3 UV Rate Constant Database . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
4.3.1 Bacteria Rate Constants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
4.3.2 Virus Rate Constants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
4.3.3 Fungi Rate Constants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
4.4 Surface UV Rate Constants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
4.5 Water Rate Constants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
4.6 Airborne Rate Constants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
4.7 Narrow Band UVC vs. Broadband UVB/UVC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
4.8 Relative Humidity Effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
4.9 Rate Constant Determinants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
4.10 UV Scattering in Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
4.11 Prediction of UV Susceptibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
Appendices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 471
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 493
Chapter 1
Introduction
will be addressed in greater detail. The chapters in this book are arranged to first
address the background information, including theory and mathematical modeling,
then equipment and design methods, and finally testing and applications. In the
Appendices are provided tabulations of data and information that are useful and
that will be referenced throughout this book.
The story of ultraviolet light begins with Isaac Newton and his contemporaries. In
1672, Isaac Newton published a series of experiments with prisms that resolved sun-
light into its constituents colors, red through violet. The effects of sunlight on man,
microorganisms, and chemicals became a matter of great interest and experimenta-
tion in the 1800s. In 1814, Fraunhofer mapped over 500 bands of sunlight, some of
which were in the ultraviolet region. In 1842, Becquerel and Draper each indepen-
dently showed that wavelengths between 340 and 400 nm induced photochemical
changes on daguerreotype plates (Hockberger 2002).
UV Lamp development predates sunlight studies on bacteria. In 1835, Wheat-
stone invented the first mercury (Hg) vapor arc lamp, but it was unstable and
short-lived. Fizeau and Foucault (1843) reported problems with their eyes after
experimenting with a carbon arc lamp, and speculated that it was due to ‘chemi-
cal rays.’ In 1850, Stokes used aluminum electrodes to produce a ‘closed’ arc lamp
in a quartz tube that emitted UV rays to 185 nm (Hockberger 2002).
The earliest scientific observations of the germicidal effects of ultraviolet radia-
tion began with Downes and Blunt (1877) who reported that bacteria were inacti-
vated by sunlight, and found that the violet-blue spectrum was the most effective. In
1885, Arloing and Duclaux demonstrated that sunlight had a killing effect on Bacil-
lus anthacis and Tyrothrix scaber, respectively. Widmark (1889, 1889a) published
studies confirming that UV rays from arc lamps were responsible for skin burns,
using a prism to separate the UV spectrum and water to block the infrared rays.
It was demonstrated in 1892 that ultraviolet light was responsible for this action
with tests on Bacillus anthracis (Ward 1892). Also in 1892, Geisler used a prism
and a heliostat to show that sunlight and electric arc lamps were lethal to Bacil-
lus typhosus. Finsen (1900) performed the first rigorous analysis of the effects of
UV light. The UV spectrum around 250 was identified as biocidal by Barnard and
Morgan (1903), and the range was narrowed by Newcomer (1917), and isolated to
1.2 Brief History of Ultraviolet Disinfection 3
253.7 nm by Ehrismann and Noethling (1932). Table 1.2 summarizes most of the
critical developments in the history of UV research and applications.
The first use of UV to disinfect drinking water is said to have been in 1906
according to von Recklinghausen (1914). In 1909/1910 the first water disinfection
system was operated at Marseilles, France. The first evidence that UV light pro-
duced photochemical effects on microorganisms was presented by Henri (1914).
In 1916 the first US system for water disinfection was tested at Henderson, KY
(AWWA 1971). In 1921, Renz demonstrated that UV could cause photoreac-
tions with titanium oxide (TiO2). Hausser and Vahle (1927) produced the first
detailed action spectrum for erythema. Bedford (1927) and Gates (1929) were
among the first to establish UV dosages necessary for bacterial disinfection. Fungal
disinfection dosages were first published by Fulton and Coblentz (1929). The
first studies on UV irradiation of viruses appear to have been those published by
1.2 Brief History of Ultraviolet Disinfection 5
Rivers and Gates (1928) and Sturm et al. (1932). Coblentz et al. (1932) refined the
erythemal action spectrum.
The 1930s saw the first applications of UV systems in hospitals to control infec-
tions (Wells and Wells 1936, Hart and Sanger 1939, Robertson et al. 1939, Kraissl
et al. 1940, Overholt and Betts 1940). The first Upper Room UV systems appear to
be those installed by Wells (1938). In the 1940s the first detailed design and analy-
sis of UV air disinfection were published along with basic guidelines for applying
UV in ventilation systems (Rentschler and Nagy 1940, Sharp 1940, Wells 1940,
Buchbinder and Phelps 1941, DelMundo and McKhann 1941, Luckiesh and Holla-
day 1942, Sommer and Stokes 1942, Henle et al. 1942, Hollaender 1943). The first
attempts to use UV systems to control respiratory infections in schools and barracks
occurred shortly thereafter (Wells et al. 1942, Wells 1943, Schneiter et al. 1944,
Wheeler et al. 1945, Perkins et al. 1947, Higgons and Hyde 1947). Several early
attempts were made to develop rigorous sizing methods and engineering guidelines
for UV applications (Luckiesh and Holladay 1942a, Luckiesh 1945, 1946).
By the 1950 s it had been well-established that UV irradiation was effective at
disinfecting both air and surfaces, and new engineering applications were being
developed. General Electric catalogs detailed a wide variety of UV applications
including various methods of installing UV lamps inside ducts and air condition-
ers (Buttolph and Haynes 1950, GE 1950). Harstad et al. (1954) demonstrated
that installation of UV lamps in air conditioners would reduce airborne contam-
ination, and that microorganisms were impinging upon and collecting on inter-
nal AHU surfaces. Bacterial growth on cooling coils had been recognized as a
potential health problem as early as 1958 (Walter 1969). The first evidence that
air cooling equipment could actually cause respiratory infections was presented
by Anderson (1959) when an air cooling apparatus was found to be contaminated
with microbial growth. This very same concern had been raised in hospital environ-
ments since about 1944 but the possibility of growth of bacteria on air-conditioning
cooling coils wasn’t conclusively demonstrated until 1964 (Cole et al. 1964). The
growth of microbes on other equipment like filters and dust inside air-conditioning
ducts was first demonstrated by Whyte (1968). The dissemination of microbes
by ventilation systems and their potential to cause respiratory infections became
widely recognized in the late 1960 s in both the medical and engineering profes-
sions (Banaszak et al. 1970, Schicht 1972, Zeterberg 1973). It was understood at
this time that microbial growth could occur anywhere that air came into contact
with moisture (Gunderman 1980, Ager and Tickner 1983, Spendlove and Fannin
1983). The first UVGI system designed specifically for disinfecting the surfaces
of air handling equipment, including humidifier water and filters, was detailed by
Grun and Pitz (1974). Luciano (1977) detailed many applications of UVGI, includ-
ing hospital applications in which the UV lamps are specifically placed upstream
of the cooling coils and downstream of the filters. In 1985 Phillips published a
design guide in which the first definitive description of applications of UV lamps
for the control of microbial growth were presented (Philips 1985). The Philips
design guide mentions European installations that were already in operation prior to
1985. In January of 1996 the first UVGI system in the US designed for controlling
6 1 Introduction
microbial growth on cooling coils was installed by Public Service of Omaha (PSO)
in Tulsa (Scheir 2000). In the same year, the Central and Southwest Corporation
followed the PSO example and began realizing considerable energy savings (ELP
2000).
Although UVGI systems had been in use in hospitals since 1936 but it wasn’t
until 2003, some sixty years later, that the CDC formally acknowledged that UV
systems were effective and could be used in hospitals with one caveat – UV Upper
Room and in-duct systems could only be used to supplement other air cleaning sys-
tems (CDC 2003). In 1957, Riley and associates successfully completed a demon-
stration of how UV air disinfection could control the spread of tuberculosis (TB) in
hospital wards (Riley et al. 1957). It wasn’t until 1994, over forty years later, that
the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) acknowledged that UV could be effective
for controlling TB, in response to the growing worldwide TB epidemic which had
resisted control by traditional methods (CDC 2005). In 2003, The influential Amer-
ican Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)
formed a task group to focus on UV air and surface treatment (TG2.UVAS) which
became the standing Technical Committee TC 2.9 in 2007 (Martin et al. 2008).
A variety of units have been used in UV disinfection for the irradiance and the UV
dose. The irradiance, sometimes called intensity, has the preferred units of W/m2 in
air and surface disinfection. The UV dose (aka fluence rate) has the preferred units
of J/m2 in air and surface disinfection. Conversion factors for the various units that
have been used in the literature are provided in Table 1.3. The use of Table 1.3 is
straightforward as shown in the following examples. Note that a joule (J) is equiva-
lent to a watt-second (W-s), and that a W/m2 is equal to a μW/mm2 .
Example 1: Convert the irradiance 144 mW/cm2 (milliwatts per square centimeter)
to units of W/m2 (watts per square meter)
Answer: Read downwards from the first column, mw/cm2 to the gray box and then
over to the second column, W/m2 , where the conversion factor is seen to be 10.
Multiply 144 × 10 = 1440 W/m2 .
Example 2: Convert the UV dose 33 μJ/cm2 (microJoules per square centimeter)
to units of J/m2 (Joules per square meter).
Answer: Read up from the fourth column, μJ/cm2 , to the gray box, and then over
to the second column, J/m2 , where the conversion factor is seen to be 0.01. Multiply
33 × 0.01 = 0.33 J/m2 .
The term ‘UVC’ is often used today to encompass all applications of germici-
dal UV but the correct definition of this term is, of course, the band of UV wave-
lengths between 200 and 280 nm, and this strict definition is the one used throughout
this book. For example, a UV lamp could refer to any lamp that produces any UV
wavelengths, including black light and suntan lamps (although in this book only
1.3 Units and Terminology 7
germicidal UV lamps are addressed). The term ‘UVGI lamp’ specifically refers to
lamps that produce UV wavelengths in the actinic ‘broad-band’ range between 200
and 320 nm (excluding black lights and sunlamps). The term ‘UVC lamp’ specif-
ically refers to lamps that produce UVC wavelengths in the ‘narrow-band’ range
200–280 nm. In current and common usage, the term ‘UVC’ often implies that the
UVC band is the only contributor to the germicidal effect, but this implication is
often incorrect and such usage is avoided in this text – wherever the term ‘UVC’ is
used herein it refers specifically to the UVC band of radiation. Other terms such as
UVR (ultraviolet radiation) and GUV (germicidal ultraviolet) have also been used
in a germicidal context in the past.
The term ‘germicidal’ implies that these UV systems destroy, kill, or inacti-
vate microorganisms such as viruses, bacteria, and fungi. Technically, viruses are
molecules, and so it customary to refer to viruses as being inactivated rather than
killed. In all cases, germicidal action means disinfection, and disinfection implies a
reduction in the microbial population, whether in air, water, or on surfaces. Micro-
bial populations are measured in terms of cfu, or colony-forming units (i.e. grown
on petri dishes). In the case of viruses, the appropriate measure of viral populations
is pfu, or plaque-forming units. However, wherever the term ‘cfu’ is used in this
book, it will be considered to apply to both viruses and bacteria (as a matter of con-
venience), with the reader’s understanding that the correct terminology for viruses
is pfu, whether it is used or not. The density of microbes in air is always given in
units of cfu/m3 (although some older texts use cfu/ft3 ). The density of microbes on
surfaces is given in cfu/cm2 (in older texts it is cfu/in2 ). The disinfection of air will
therefore be measured in terms of a reduction in the airborne density in cfu/m3, and
the disinfection of surfaces is measured in terms of the reduction of cfu/cm2 .
Sterilization is a related term that implies the complete elimination of a microbial
population. It is difficult, however, to actually demonstrate the complete elimination
of a microbial population since any microbiological test will have some limit of
8 1 Introduction
The use of UV to disinfect air goes back some eighty years, and yet applications
are still far from being common in modern buildings. Although nine out of ten
UVGI field studies had positive results, the few that did not meet grand expectations
were cited most often as proof of failure. In 1936 Hart used an array of UV lamps
to sterilize supply air in a surgical operating room (Hart 1937). In 1937 the first
installation of UV lamps in a school ventilation system dramatically reduced the
incidence of measles, and subsequent applications enjoyed similar successes (Riley
1972). In the late 1940s, Wells and his associates installed UV systems across entire
communities and demonstrated reductions in community disease transmission rates
(Wells and Holla 1950). In the late 1950 s experiments using guinea pigs demon-
strated the elimination of tuberculosis (TB) bacilli from hospital ward exhaust air
1.8 Pathogens and Allergens 11
(Riley and O’Grady 1961). A plethora of designs that were more imitative then
engineered followed these early applications. The result was a mixture of suc-
cesses and failures. In one poorly planned study by the MRC, investigators failed
to achieve statistically significant reductions of disease and concluded erroneously
that UV failed to reduce disease incidence (MRC 1954). The MRC study put a
severe damper on further development of UV technology in the 1950 s and 1960 s,
and as a result of this study being widely quoted (and in spite of it being widely
criticized by experts), brought a near halt to further implementations and slowed
research (Riley 1980, 1980a). This setback of the UV industry cannot be measured
in terms of lost development, lost field data, lost health care costs, or lost lives, but
there are those who today continue to insist that UVGI is an unproven ‘snake oil’
technology. We must convince them otherwise.
As a result of an apparently imperfect record of success, UVGI was widely
ignored in various guidelines and standards, particularly in health care settings,
where it should have been directly addressed. Without the sanction of the highest
health authorities, UVGI languished and was largely ignored in health care settings
where it would have done the most good. This checkered history is reflected in var-
ious guidelines that decline to mention the use of UVGI. Only a select few of the
most well-informed hospitals and researchers took the time to investigate and adopt
UV technologies, often with great success (Goldner and Allen 1973, Goldner et al.
1980, Nardell 1988). Recently, new research has reaffirmed what the original stud-
ies had always said, that UV technology can have a major impact on the reduction
of various types of nosocomial and community-acquired infections (Menzies et al.
2003, Ritter et al. 2007, Escombe et al. 2009).
Pathogens are any microbes that cause infections in humans and animals, and these
include viruses, bacteria, and fungi. Some larger microbes, like protozoa, may also
cause infections but these parasites are generally too large to be airborne. There-
fore, this book primarily addresses only viruses, bacteria, and fungi, including bac-
terial spores and fungal spores, as air and surface contaminants. Insects, like dust
mites, are not eradicable by UV and are not addressed in this text. All of the viruses
listed in Appendix B are pathogens or bacteriophages, as are most of the bacteria in
Appendix A and some of the fungi in Appendix C.
Allergens are microbes, biological products, and compounds that induce aller-
gic reactions in atopic, or susceptible, individuals. Compounds and biological
products (i.e. VOCs and pet dander) are generally not very susceptible to UV
destruction (although they are easily removed by filters) and so they are not
specifically addressed in this book. The allergens addressed in this book are strictly
fungi and bacteria – there are no viral allergens. Some pathogens may also be aller-
gens. Almost all of the fungi listed in Appendix C are allergens, and many of these
are also pathogens. Almost all of the bacteria listed in Appendix A are pathogens,
and some of these are also allergens.
12 1 Introduction
Some bacteria, and virtually all fungi, can form spores. In the normal or growth
state (called ‘vegetative’) bacteria exist as cells, and fungi exist as cells or yeast.
Spore-forming (sporulating) bacteria and fungi will form spores under the right con-
ditions (usually adverse conditions). Spores are dormant forms, usually more com-
pact than the cell forms, round or ovoid shaped, and can resist heat, dehydration,
and cold much better than the cell (or vegetative) form. They also tend to be resis-
tant to UV exposure. Since they are typically smaller than the original cells, spores
tend to become airborne easily and can be transported outdoors. Spores require only
warmth, moisture, and shade to germinate, or return to a vegetative state, and require
only nutrients to grow and multiply.
Some bacteria and fungi produce toxins, including endotoxins and exotoxins.
UV has a limited effect on toxins but prolonged exposure can reduce toxin concen-
trations (Anderson et al. 2003, Asthana and Tuveson 1992, Shantha and Sreenivasa
1977). High levels of growth are required, usually under adverse conditions, for
microbes to produce toxins, and since UV destroys toxin-producing bacteria and
fungi, it is unlikely that sufficient levels of toxins will remain after UV disinfection
to pose toxic hazards.
In spite of the extensive research results available on UVGI air and surface dis-
infection, much work remains to be done. Recent studies have demonstrated the
effectiveness of UVGI and have hinted at the possible reduction of airborne disease
in commercial office buildings. The ability of UVGI to save costs in cooling coil
maintenance has been fairly well established. There is also a need for more research
to determine UV rate constants for a wider array of pathogens. Towards this end has
been provided a guideline for laboratory testing (included in this book) that should
facilitate the production of reproducible test results, something that has not always
been the case in the past.
In addition to providing the most up-to-date information from current literature
of UVGI, this text also provides the fruits of the author’s research into UV sus-
ceptibility, including a model for relative humidity effects in air, and a genomic
model for predicting the UV susceptibility for viruses (addressed in Chaps. 2 and
4). Also presented here for the first time is the author’s research on pulsed UV light
modeling.
Perhaps the most important applications of UVGI today is in the health care
industry, which is in dire need of solutions to the problem of hospital-acquired
(nosocomial) infections. Such infections have now spread outwards to become
community-acquired infections and it is likely this pattern will keep repeating
with new and emerging pathogens and drug-resistant strains until a more effective
solution is implemented on a wide scale. UVGI can play a major role in limiting
the spread of nosocomial infections but what is needed most is not new technology
(adequate technology exists in the present) but encouragement and support in terms
of guidelines and recommendations on UV technology from those authorities who
have until recently been somewhat reticent and noncommittal on the matter.
References 13
References
Ager BP, Tickner JA. 1983. The control of microbiological hazards associated with air-
conditioning and ventilation systems. Ann Occup Hyg 27(4):341–358.
Anderson K. 1959. Pseudomonas pyocyanea disseminated form an air cooling apparatus. Med J
Aus 1:529.
Anderson WB, Huck PM, Dixon DG, Mayfield CI. 2003. Endotoxin inactivation in water by using
medium-pressure UV lamps. Appl Environ Microbiol 69(5):3002–3004.
Asthana A, Tuveson RW. 1992. Effects of UV and phototoxins on selected fungal pathogens of
citrus. Int J Plant Sci 153(3):442–452.
AWWA. 1971. Water Quality and Treatment. The American Water Works Association I, editor.
New York: McGraw-Hill.
Banaszak EF, Thiede WH, Fink JN. 1970. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis due to contamination of
an air conditioner. New England J Med 283(6):271–276.
Barnard J, Morgan H. 1903. The physical factors in phototherapy. Brit Med J 2:1269–1271.
Bedford THB. 1927. The nature of the action of ultra-violet light on micro-organisms. Brit J Exp
Path 8:437–441.
Bolton JR, Cotton CA. 2008. Ultraviolet disinfection handbook. Denver, CO: American Water
Works Association.
Buchbinder L, Phelps EB. 1941. Studies on microorganisms in simulated room environments. II.
The survival rates of streptococci in the dark. J Bact 42:345–351.
Buttolph LJ, Haynes H. 1950. Ultraviolet Air Sanitation. Cleveland, OH: General Electric. Report
nr LD-11.
CDC. 2003. Guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities. MMWR
52(RR-10).
CDC. 2005. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in health-
care facilities. In: CDC, editor. Federal Register. Washington: US Govt. Printing Office.
14 1 Introduction
CIE. 2003. Ultraviolet Air Disinfection. Vienna, Austria: International Commission on Illumina-
tion. Report nr CIE 155:2003.
Coblentz WW, Stair R, Hogue JM. 1932. Spectral erythemic reaction of the untanned human skin
to ultraviolet radiation. J Res Nat Bur Stand 8:541–547.
Cole WR, Bernard HR, Dunn B. 1964. Growth of bacteria on direct expansion air-conditioning
coils. Surgery 55(3):436–439.
DelMundo F, McKhann CF. 1941. Effect of ultra-violet irradiation of air on incidence of infections
in an infant’s hospital. Am J Dis Child 61:213–225.
Downes A, Blunt TP. 1877. Research on the effect of light upon bacteria and other organisms. Proc
Roy Soc London 26:488–500.
Ehrismann O, Noethling W. 1932. Uber die bactericide wirkung monochromatischen lichtes.
Ztschr Hyg Infektionskr 113:597–628.
ELP. 2000. How UV-C lamps saved one company $58,000. Electric Light & Power 78(2).
Escombe A, Moore D, Gilman R, Navincopa M, Ticona E, Mitchell B, Noakes C, Martinez C,
Sheen P, Ramirez R and others. 2009. Upper-room ultraviolet light and negative air ionization
to prevent tuberculosis transmission. PLoS Med 6(3):312–322.
FEMA. 2003. Reference Manual to Mitigate Potential Terrorist Attacks Against Buildings: Federal
Emergency Management Agency. Report nr FEMA 426.
Finsen N. 1900. Die Resultate der Behandlung des lupus vulgaris durch knzentrierte chemische
Lichtstrahlen. Allg Wien Med Z A5:60–65.
Fizeau H, Foucault L. 1843. Observations concernant l’action des rayons rouges sur les plaques
degueeriennes. C R Habd Seances Acad Sci 23:679–682.
Fulton HR, Coblentz WW. 1929. The fungicidal action of ultraviolet radiation. J Agric Res 38:159.
Gates FL. 1929. A study of the bactericidal action of ultraviolet light. J Gen Physiol 13:231–260.
GE. 1950. Germicidal Lamps and Applications. USA: General Electric. Report nr SMA TAB:
VIII-B.
Goldner JL, Allen BL. 1973. Ultraviolet light in orthopedic operating rooms at Duke University.
Clin Ortho 96:195–205.
Goldner JL, Moggio M, Beissinger SF, McCollum DE. 1980. Ultraviolet light for the control of
airborne bacteria in the operating room. In: Kundsin RB, editor. Airborne Contagion, Annals
of the New York Academy of Sciences. New York: NYAS, pp. 271–284.
Grun L, Pitz N. 1974. U.V. radiators in humidifying units and air channels of air conditioning
systems in hospitals. Zbl Bakt Hyg B159:50–60.
GSA. 2003. The Facilities Standards for the Public Buildings Service. Washington: Public Build-
ings Service of the General Services Administration.
Guha S, Bojarczuk N. 1998. Ultraviolet and violet GaN light emitting diodes on silicon. Appl Phys
Lett 72:415.
Gunderman KO. 1980. Spread of microorganisms by air-conditioning systems – especially in
hospitals. In: Kundsin RB, editor. Airborne Contagion. Boston: New York Academy of Sci-
ences, pp.209–217.
Harstad JB, Decker HM, Wedum AG. 1954. Use of ultraviolet irradiation in a room air conditioner
for removal of bacteria. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 2:148–151.
Hart J. 1936. Sterilization of air in operating room by special bactericidal radiant energy. J Thoracic
Surg 6:45–81.
Hart D. 1937. Operating room infections: preliminary report. Arch Surg 34:874–896.
Hart D, Sanger PW. 1939. Effect on wound healing of bactericidal ultraviolet radiation from a
special unit: experimental study. Arch Surg 38(5):797–815.
Hausser K, Vahle W. 1927. Sonnenbrand und sonnenbraunung. In: Reiter T, Gabor D, editors.
Zellteilung und Strahlung. Berlin: Springer, pp. 101–120.
Henle W, Sommer HE, Stokes J. 1942. Studies on air-borne infection in a hospital ward: II. Effects
of ultra-violet irradiation and propylene glycol vaporization upon the prevention of experimen-
tal air-borne infection of mice by droplet nuclei. J Pediat 21:577–590.
Henri V. 1912. Comparison de l’action des rayons ultrav-violets sur les organismes avec les reac-
tions photochemique simples et complexes. Compt Rend Soc Biol 73:323–325.
References 15
Henri V. 1914. Etude de l’action metabolique des rayons ultraviolets. CR Acad Sci (Paris)
159:340–343.
Higgons RA, Hyde GM. 1947. Effect of ultra-violet air sterilization upon incidence of respiratory
infections in a children’s institution. New York State J Med 47(7).
Hockberger P. 2002. A history of ultraviolet photobiology for humans, animals, and microorgan-
isms. Photochem Photobiol 76(6):561–579.
Hollaender A. 1943. Effect of long ultraviolet and short visible radiation (3500 to 4900) on
Escherichia coli. J Bact 46:531–541.
Kowalski WJ. 2006. Aerobiological Engineering Handbook: A Guide to Airborne Disease Control
Technologies. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kraissl CJ, Cimiotti JG, Meleney FL. 1940. Considerations in the use of ultra-violet radiation in
operating rooms. Ann Surg 111:161–185.
Lorch W. 1987. Handbook of Water Purification. Chichester: Ellis Horwood Ltd.
Luciano JR. 1977. Air Contamination Control in Hospitals. New York: Plenum Press.
Luckiesh M, Taylor AH. 1925. Fading of colored materials in daylight and artificial light. Trans
Illum Eng Soc 20:1078.
Luckiesh M, Holladay LL. 1942. Tests and data on disinfection of air with germicidal lamps. Gen
Electric Rev 45(4):223–231.
Luckiesh M, Holladay LL. 1942a. Designing installations of germicidal lamps for occupied rooms.
General Electric Review 45(6):343–349.
Luckiesh M. 1945. Disinfection with germicidal lamps: Air – II. Electrical World Oct.13:109 –111.
Luckiesh M. 1946. Applications of Germicidal, Erythemal and Infrared Energy. New York:
D. Van Nostrand Co.
Martin S, Dunn C, Friehaut J, Bahnfleth W, Lau J, Nedeljkovic A. 2008. Ultraviolet germicidal
irradiation: current best practices. ASHRAE J August:28–36.
Menzies D, Popa J, Hanley JA, Rand T, Milton DK. 2003. Effect of ultraviolet germicidal lights
installed in office ventilation systems on workers health and wellbeing: double-blind multiple
crossover trials. The Lancet 362(November 29):1785–1791.
MRC. 1954. Air Disinfection with Ultra-violet Irradiation; Its Effect on Illness among School-
Children by the Air Hygiene Committee. London: Medical Research Council, Her Majesty’s
Stationary Office. Report nr 283.
Nardell EA. 1988. Chapter 12: Ultraviolet air disinfection to control tuberculosis. In: Kundsin RB,
editor. Architectural Design and Indoor Microbial Pollution. New York: Oxford University
Press, pp. 296–308.
Newcomer H. 1917. The abiotic action of ultraviolet light. J Exp Med 26:841.
Overholt RH, Betts RH. 1940. A comparative report on infection of thoracoplasty wounds.
J Thoracic Surg 9:520–529.
Perkins JE, Bahlke AM, Silverman HF. 1947. Effect of ultra-violet irradiation of classrooms on the
spread of measles in large rural central schools. Am J Pub Health 37:529–537.
Philips. 1985. UVGI Catalog and Design Guide. Netherlands: Catalog No. U.D.C. 628.9.
Prat S. 1936. Strahlung und antagonistische wirkungen. Protoplasma 26:113–149.
Rentschler HC, Nagy R. 1940. Advantages of bactericidal ultraviolet radiation in air conditioning
systems. HPAC 12:127–130.
Renz C. 1921. Photo-reactions of the oxides of titanium, cerium, and earth-acids. Helv Chim Acta
4:961.
Riley R, Wells W, Mills C, Nyka W, McLean R. 1957. Air hygiene in tuberculosis: Quantitative
studies of infectivity and control in a pilot ward. Am Rev Tuberc Pulmon 75:420–431.
Riley RL, O’Grady F. 1961. Airborne Infection. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Riley RL. 1972. The ecology of indoor atmospheres: Airborne infection in hospitals. J Chron Dis
25:421–423.
Riley RL. 1980. Part I. History and epidemiology: Historical background. In: Kundsin RB, edi-
tor. Airborne Contagion, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. New York: NYAS,
pp. 1–9.
16 1 Introduction
Riley RL. 1980a. Prevention and control of airborne infection in the community. In: Kundsin RB,
editor. Airborne Contagion, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. New York: NYAS,
pp. 331–339.
Ritter M, Olberding E, Malinzak R. 2007. Ultraviolet lighting during orthopaedic surgery and the
rate of infection. J Bone Joint Surg 89:1935–1940.
Rivers T, Gates F. 1928. Ultra-violet light and vaccine virus. II. The effect of monochromatic ultra-
violet light upon vaccine virus. J Exp Med 47:45–49.
Robertson EC, Doyle ME, Tisdall FF, Koller LR, Ward FS. 1939. Air contamination and air steril-
ization. Am J Dis Child 58:1023–1037.
Scheir R. 2000. Electric utility solves IAQ problem with UVC electrical energy. HPAC Eng
69(5):28–29, 85, 87.
Schicht HH. 1972. The diffusion of micro-organisms by air conditioning installations. The Steam
and Heating Engineer October:6–13.
Schneiter R, Hollaender A, Caminita BH, Kolb RW, Fraser HF, duBuy HG, Neal PA,
Rosenblum HG. 1944. Effectiveness of ultra-violet irradiation of upper air for the control of
bacterial air contamination in sleeping quarters. Am J Hyg 40:136.
Shantha T, Sreenivasa M. 1977. Photo-destruction of aflatoxin in groundnut oil. Indian J Technol
15:453.
Sharp G. 1940. The effects of ultraviolet light on bacteria suspended in air. J Bact 38:535–547.
Sommer HE, Stokes J. 1942. Studies on air-borne infection in a hospital ward. J Pediat 21:569–576.
Spendlove JC, Fannin KF. 1983. Source, significance, and control of indoor microbial aerosols:
Human health aspects. Public Health Rep 98(3):229–244.
USACE. 2000. Guidelines on the Design and Operation of HVAC Systems in Disease Isolation
Areas. U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine. Report nr TG252.
von Recklinghausen M. 1914. The Ultra-Violet rays and their application for the sterilization of
water. J Franklin Institute 1057–1062:681–704.
Walter CW. 1969. Ventilation and air conditioning as bacteriologic engineering. Anesthesiology
31:186–192.
Ward M. 1892. Experiments of the action of light on Bacillus anthracis. Proc Roy Soc Lond
52:393–403.
Wells W, Wells M. 1936. Air-borne infection. JAMA 107:1698–1703.
Wells WF. 1938. Air-borne infections. Mod Hosp 51:66–69.
Wells WF. 1940. Bactericidal irradiation of air, physical factors. J Franklin Inst 229:347–372.
Wells WF, Wells MW, Wilder TS. 1942. The environmental control of epidemic contagion; I – An
epidemiologic study of radiant disinfection of air in day schools. Am J Hyg 35:97–121.
Wells WF. 1943. Air disinfection in day schools. Am J Pub Health 33:1436–1443.
Wells WF, Holla WA. 1950. Ventilation in flow of measles and chickenpox through community.
Progress report, Jan. 1, 1946 to June 15, 1949, airborne infection study. J Am Med Assoc
142:1337–1344.
Wheeler SM, Ingraham HS, Hollaender A, Lill ND, Gershon-Cohen J, Brown EW. 1945. Ultra-
violet light control of airborne infections in a naval training center. Am J Pub Health
35:457–468.
Whitby G, Scheible O. 2004. The history of UV and wastewater. IUVA News 6(3):15–26.
WHO. 1999. Guidelines for the Prevention of Tuberculosis in Health Care Facilities in Resource
Limited Settings. Geneva: World Health Organization. Report nr WHO/CDS/TB/99.269.
Whyte W. 1968. Bacteriological aspects of air-conditioning plants. J Hyg 66:567–584.
Widmark E. 1889. Uber den einfluss des lichtes auf die haut. Hygiea 3:1–23.
Widmark J. 1889a. De l’influence de la lumiere sur la peau. Biol Foren Forhandl Verhandlungen
Biolog Vereins 1:9–13, 131–134.
Zeterberg JM. 1973. A review of respiratory virology and the spread of virulent and possibly
antigenic viruses via air conditioning systems. Ann Allergy 31:228–299.
Chapter 2
UVGI Disinfection
Theory
2.1 Introduction
2.2 UV Inactivation
The spectrum of ultraviolet light extends from wavelengths of about 100–400 nm.
The subdivisions of most interest include UVC (200–280 nm), and UVB
(280–320 nm). Although all UV wavelengths cause some photochemical effects,
wavelengths in the UVC range are particularly damaging to cells because they are
absorbed by proteins, RNA, and DNA (Bolton and Cotton 2008, Rauth 1965). The
germicidal effectiveness of UVC is illustrated in Fig. 2.1, where it can be observed
that germicidal efficiency reaches a peak at about 260–265 nm. This corresponds to
the peak of UV absorption by bacterial DNA (Harm 1980). The germicidal effec-
tiveness of UVC and UVB wavelengths can vary between species. Low pressure