0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views7 pages

Exercises in Labor Economics (NAA203) : 6. Ed. Ex. 4-9

This document contains exercises and solutions from an economics textbook on labor economics. The exercises model labor market situations using production functions, demand curves, and cost functions. They are solved to find equilibrium outcomes like optimal employment levels, wages, output, and firm profits. The solutions show calculations and use of optimization techniques like taking derivatives of profit functions to find profit-maximizing levels.

Uploaded by

Wilson Pulla
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views7 pages

Exercises in Labor Economics (NAA203) : 6. Ed. Ex. 4-9

This document contains exercises and solutions from an economics textbook on labor economics. The exercises model labor market situations using production functions, demand curves, and cost functions. They are solved to find equilibrium outcomes like optimal employment levels, wages, output, and firm profits. The solutions show calculations and use of optimization techniques like taking derivatives of profit functions to find profit-maximizing levels.

Uploaded by

Wilson Pulla
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Exercises in Labor economics (NAA203)

Some useful exercises adapted from old editions of Labor economics by George J. Borjas

6. ed. Ex. 4-9

A firm produces an output good using labor as its only input, according to the pro-
duction function

q = 2E

where q is the number of units produced, and E is the number of hours worked.
It has a monopoly on its product and, being the only employer in the area, it’s a
monopsonist on its labor market. On the product market, the firm faces the inverse
demand curve

p = 30 − 0.4q

where p is the price per unit. It hires labor according to the inverse labor supply curve

w = 0.9E + 5

where w is the hourly wage.


(a) What is the optimal employment level E?
(b) What wage w will the firm pay?
(c) How much output q will the firm produce?
(d) What price p will the firm charge for its product?
(e) What will be the firm’s profits?

Solution

(a) The firm is assumed to maximize profits

π = pq − wE

Substituting the inverse product demand for p, the inverse labor supply for w, and the
production function for q yields

π = (30 − 0.4q)q − wE = (30 − 0.4(2E))(2E) − (0.9E + 5)E

which simplifies to

π = 55E − 2.5E 2
At profit maximum, the derivative of profits with respect to employment is zero, so

= 55 − 5E = 0
dE
Solving for employment yields

E = 11

(a) Alternatively use the first order condition that the marginal revenue times the
marginal product of labor is equal to the marginal cost of labor.

MR MPE = MCE

Marginal revenue is the derivative of revenue with respect to quantity (q):

d d
MR = (pq) = (30 − 0.4q)q = 30 − 0.8q = 30 − 0.8(2E) = 30 − 1.6E
dq dq

The marginal product of labor is the derivative of production with respect to labor (E):

dq d
MPE = = (2E) = 2
dE dE
The marginal cost of labor is the derivative of costs with respect to labor (E):

d d
MCE = (wE) = (0.9E + 5)E = 1.8E + 5
dE dE
Substituting these marginal effects into the optimum conditions yields

(30 − 1, 6E)2 = 1.8E + 5

Solving for employment yields

E = 11

(b) The wage w is calculated by substituting employment E = 11 into the inverse labor
supply function.

w = 0.9E + 5 = 0.9 · 11 + 5 = 14.9

(c) Substituting employment E = 11 into the production function yields production q.

q = 2E = 2 · 11 = 22

(d) The product price p is obtained by substituting production q = 22 into the inverse
product demand function.

p = 30 − 0.4q = 30 − 0.4 · 22 = 21.2


(e) Profits π are calculated as

π = pq − wE = 21.2 · 22 − 14.9 · 11 = 302.5

6. ed. Ex. 5-12

A firm produces an output good using labor as input. The firm has contracted to
supply q = 2 000 units of output for the price p = 700 per unit. To produce this
amount, the firm must employ E = 20 workers.
The firm must choose how much to invest in a safe working environment. The firm
can choose any level of safety, S, from 0 to 100. The cost of safety is C(S) = 50S 2 .
Given the firm’s choice of safety, the wage payed to workers is

w = 60 000 − 300S

(a) What level of safety (S) will the firm choose?


(b) What is the cost C(S) of this optimal safety level?
(c) What wage (w) will each worker earn?
(d) What are the firm’s profits?

Solution

(a) The firm’s costs C of hiring E = 20 workers are wage costs and the cost of safety.

C = wE + C(S)

Substituting the wage function, the safety cost and the employment level yields:

C = wE + C(S) = 20(60 000 − 300S) + 50S 2 = 1 200 000 − 6 000S + 50S 2

The firm would like to minimize this cost. At cost minimum, the derivative of costs
with respect to safety is zero.
dC
= −6 000 + 100S = 0
dS
With the solution for optimal safety

S = 60

(b) The cost of safety is

C(S) = 50S 2 = 50(60)2 = 180 000


(c) The wage at safety level S = 60 is

w = 60 000 − 300S = 60 000 − 300 · 60 = 42 000

(d) Profits are

π = pq − wE − C(S) = 700 · 2 000 − 42 000 · 20 − 180 000 = 380 000

6. ed. Ex. 11-13

A firm produces an output good using labor as its only input. Total output is propor-
tional to the number of workers employed. The relationship between a worker’s dayly
wage, w, and his dayly output, q, is

q = 0.1w2 − 0.0005w3

(a) What is the optimal efficiency wage (w) for the firm to pay?
(b) How much output (q) will each worker produce?
(c) Suppose the firm sells its output at the constant price p = 0.80 per unit. How
much dayly profit does the firm earn on each worker’s output?

Solution

(a) In order to maximize profits, the firm would choose a wage to minimize its cost per
unit of output is w/q. This is equivalent to maximizing the inverse of unit cost, q/w,
which in this case leads to simpler mathematical expressions. An expressioin for the
inverse unit cost is
q 0.1w2 − 0.0005w3
= = 0.1w − 0.0005w2
w w
The first order condition for a maximum is
d q
= 0.1 − 0.001w = 0
dw w
Solving for w yields

w = 100

(a) Alternatively use the Solow condition:


w dq
=1
q dw
or equivalently
dq q
=
dw w
i.e. the marginal product of the wage is equal to the inverse unit cost. The marginal
product of the wage is
dq
= 0.2w − 0.0015w2
dw
and the inverse unit cost is
q
= 0.1w − 0.0005w2
w
Substituting these expressions into the Solow condition yields
0.2w − 0.0015w2 = 0.1w − 0.0005w2
This quadratic equation has two solutions. One is w = 0, which is optimal only if it’s
impossible to earn positive profits. The other solution is obtained by dividing both
sides by w.
0.2 − 0.0015w = 0.1 − 0.0005w
Solving for w yields
w = 100

(b) Production per worker is


q = 0.1w2 − 0.0005w3 = 0, 1(100)2 − 0.0005(100)3 = 500

(c) Profits per worker are


π = pq − w = 0.8 · 500 − 100 = 300

6. ed. Ex. 12-8

The population of a country can be divided into the employed, the unemployed, and
the persons who are out of the labor force (OLF).
In any given year, the transition probabilities among the various categories are given
by the following table.

Moving into
Employed Unemployed OLF
Moving from: Employed 0.94 0.02 0.04
Unemployed 0.20 0.65 0.15
OLF 0.05 0.03 0.92

The transition probabilities are interpreted as follows. In any given year, 2% of the
employed become unemployed, 20% of the unemployed find jobs, and so on.
(a) What is the steady state employment rate?
(b) What is the steady state unemployment rate?
(c) What is the steady state labor force participation rate?
Solution

Denote the number of people in the population by P , the number of employed by E,


and the number of unemployed by U . Let e = E/P be the share of the population
which are employed, and u′ = U/P the share of the population which are unemployed.
Note that u′ is not the unemployment rate. The unemployment rate u is the share of
the labor force that are unemployed:

U u′ P u′
u= = =
E+U eP + u′ P e + u′
The share of the population that is out of the labor force is 1 − e − u′ .
The flow of workers out of employment into unemployemt and out of the labor force
(OLF) is

(0.02 + 0.04)e = 0.06e

The flow into employment from unemployment and OLF is

0.20u′ + 0.05(1 − e − u′ )

Steady state requires that inflow into employment equals outflow from employment.

0.20u′ + 0.05(1 − e − u′ ) = 0.06e

Likewise, the flow out of unemployment into employemt and OLF is

(0.20 + 0.15)u′ = 0.35u′

The flow into unemployment from employment and from OLF is

0.02e + 0.03(1 − e − u′ )

Again, steady state requires that inflow equals outflow.

0.02e + 0.03(1 − e − u′ ) = 0.35u′

The steady state values of the two variables e and u′ are determined by the two steady
state equations

0.20u′ + 0.05(1 − e − u′ ) = 0.06e

0.02e + 0.03(1 − e − u′ ) = 0.35u′


Algebraic rearanging brings them into the so called normal form

0.11e − 0.15u′ = 0.05

0.01e + 0.38u′ = 0.03


Multiplying the second equation by 11 and subracting the first yields

4.33u′ = 0.28

Thus
0.28
u′ = = 0.064665
4.33
Solving the second equation above for e yields

e = 3 − 38u′

Substituting the value for u’ gives


0.28
e = 3 − 38 = 0.54273
4.33
So the solution to the equation system for steady state is e = 0.54273, u′ = 0.064665
(a) The steady state employment rate is

e = 0.54273 = 54%

(b) The steady state unemployment rate is

u′ 0.064665
u= = = 0.10646 = 10.6%
e + u′ 0.54273 + 0.064665

(c) The steady state labor force participation rate is

E+U
= e + u′ = 0.54273 + 0.064665 = 0.60739 = 60.7%
P

You might also like