10 VI June 2022

https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.43447
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VI June 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com

Analysis of Composite Beam with Shear

Connectors Using FEA Software (ANSYS)
2 3
Sahana S Madiwalar1, Dr. R. Subash Chandra Bose , Prof. Shiva Shankar K M
1
PG Student, M.Tech in Structural Engineering, ACSCE Bangalore
2
Associate Professor, 3Assistant Professor, Dept Of Civil Engineering, ACSCE Bangalore.

Abstract: The Composite structures made of concrete slabs and rolled steel profiles are widely used components in bridges and
High buildings. Composite effects are created by connecting concrete slabs and steel profiles with chemical anchors. In this
paper, I analyze three types of shear connectors ( Headstud, T shape, Channel section ) with different grade of concrete M-20,
M-30, M-40 based on design strength given by the code book IS: 11384-1985. Based on their performance under static load, find
the best connector for a particular composite beam while maintaining the stress and amount of steel in the connector as a
common aspect.
Keywords: Composite beams, Ansys Software, Shear Connectors.

I. INTRODUCTION
Composite beams, which are constructed by laying concrete slabs on concrete beams and connecting them with steel or shear
connectors, are structural elements that are commonly used in structures such as bridges and skyscrapers. Bridges and buildings
frequently use plate and beam structures. Plate girder interaction is enabled by shear connectors welded to the top of the steel girder
flange. You can eliminate slippage between the beams and the concrete slabs by using proper connections. As a result, the steel
beam and plate behave as a "composite beam," similar to a monolithic T-beam.
Steel-concrete composite structures, particularly multi-layer steel frames, have a significant market share in a number of European
countries, as well as the United States, Canada, and Australia. This is primarily due to decreased construction depth, reduced steel
weight, and rapid construction programmers. By combining structural elements to form a single compound section, the compound
action improves structural efficiency. By reducing materials, slimming floor depth, and speeding up the structure, composite beam
construction offers significant cost savings. Furthermore, this system is known for its increased stiffness and strength when
compared to non-composite solutions. Composite beams are structural members made of two or more different materials that are
connected in some way to function as a single unit.
A reinforced concrete composite beam is a simple example of a composite beam in a building structure. Wide steel shapes like I and
W are fixed in the laboratory's concrete floors. Reinforced wood, concrete wood, and plastic concrete are all examples of composite
beams. The composite beams shown here differ from the fibre reinforced polymer beams shown in the figure below.

Typical composite floor system

II. OBJECTIVE
The goal is to test the effect of the number, size, and height of shear connectors in composite beams. These verifications were
accomplished through the investigation of longitudinal slip in the slab beam interface, vertical deformation at mid span, and
composite beam bearing capacity. The results were compared to standards and other dates identified in the examined literature.

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 795
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VI June 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com

III. LITRATURE REVIEW

1) Sandatmanesh et al. [1989] - Prestressed with high-strength steel tendon and investigated the behavior of steel girders bonded
to concrete slabs. Bradford and Gilbert [1992] developed a theoretical model of the time-dependent response of simply
supported reinforced concrete composite beams. In 2000, Ayoub and Filippou developed inelastic beam elements for studying
partially bonded reinforced concrete beams under monotonous and repeated loads.
2) Chung and Wang (2006) - Shear connection flexibility can affect the structural behavior of continuous composite beams not
only in terms of load deflection behavior, including initial stiffness, but also in terms of load bearing capacity. I understand. ..
This work also investigated the effect of the flexibility of the shear connection of semi-continuous beams on both global and
local operating elements.
3) Lee et al. (2005)- They did examine at the conduct of massive shear stud connectors utilized in metal concrete composite
bridges. Since too many small length connectors like 19 mm and 22 mm length are required in regions of excessive shear in
composite bridges. That reasons longer welding time and different problems. It turned into discovered that the protection
elements used for ordinary length studs ought to be elevated for massive length studs, and fatigue energy discovered in massive
studs is little decrease than ordinary studs.
4) Smitha. K (2015) - Finite elment analysis of composite beams with shear connectors Composite structures made of concrete
slabs and coiled steel profiles are widely used components in bridges and skyscrapers. Composite effects are created by
connecting concrete slabs and steel profiles with chemical anchors. In this paper, we analyze four types of shear connectors and,
based on their performance under static load, find the best connector for a particular composite beam while maintaining the
stress and amount of steel in the connector as a common aspect.
5) Lam and El-Lobody (2005)-They did study on composite beam using headed studs. Lam first did experimental work using
shear studs in push-off test. The result obtained are then validated with the finite element model developed by him for the same
push-out test in ABAQUS. Lam concluded that ABAQUS can be used for modeling composite beams and can replace the
costly experimental work.
IV. PROBLEM OUTLINE
There has been little research into using ANSYS to model partial interaction of steel concrete composite beams. ANSYS is
appropriate for engineering simulation programmes because it is based on the finite element method and can solve relatively simple
linear analyses as well as nonlinear simulations. ANSYS has a large library of elements that allow us to model almost any type of
geometry. It also includes a large number of material models that allow us to simulate the behaviour of various materials such as
metals, polymers, and rubber composites, reinforced, crushable, concrete, and resilient foams. ANSYS provides a wide range of
simulation capabilities for linear and nonlinear problems. The geometry of each component is defined with appropriate material
models and component interactions to model problems with many components. ANSYS automatically selects load increments and
continuously adjusts convergence and tolerances during a non-linear analysis to ensure the correct solution is obtained.
V. METHODOLOGY
The below flowchart shows the methodology of the study

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 796
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VI June 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com

VI. RESEARCH APPROACH

Finite element model has been created using ANSYS. Data from different published experimental results were collected and
modelling has been developed. Behaviour of shear connectors in composite beam has to be found out. The objective was achieved
by carrying out analysis of composite beams as follows.
1) A detailed literature study.
2) Modelling of steel concrete composite beam in ANSYS.
3) Validation of the FE model in ANSYS with the published experimental results.
4) Generating results for different type of connectors so that it can be used instead of doing the experimental work.

VII. SHEAR CONNECTORS

Composite construction provides monolithic action between pre-fabricated units such as steel beams, pre-cast reinforced concrete,
pre-stressed concrete beams, and cast in-situ concrete, allowing two elements to act as a single unit. Although there is some natural
bonding between the concrete slab and the steel beam in the early phases, this connection cannot be relied on because it is likely to
erode due to use and over load. Mechanical shear connectors are thus given to assist the steel and concrete elements in acting in a
composite manner without ignoring the contribution offered by the inbuilt natural bond. Shear connectors are primarily
recommended to resist horizontal movement between the concrete slab and the steel beam and to spread horizontal shear between
the concrete slab and the steel beam. Shear connectors are also utilised to prevent the slab from vertically separating from the steel
gurder at the contact surface. As a result, shear connectors must be constructed to provide integral action of the composite structure
under all load circumstances, as follows: a) Without slip, transmit longitudinal shear along the surface in contact. b) To prevent
vertical separation of in-situ RC slabs from pre-fabricated steel beams.

VIII. PARTIAL INTERACTION

In reality, it is expected that there is no slide at the interface of a steel-concrete composite beam when using a stiff form of shear
connector. However, research over the years have revealed that even when utilising a rigid form of connector in a composite beam,
there is always some slide at the interface. As a result, it is not possible to create a completely firm link. The flexibility of the
connector also improves the ductility of the connection.
The connectors are expected to resist the longitudinal shear force even when deformed to determine the shear resistance and shear
capacity of the connection. The resistance of the beam is determined by the shear resistance of the connections. The slip that
happens at the interface as a result of the deformations has a significant impact on the stiffness of the composite beam.

Types of Interactions:-
1) No Interaction: It means there is no connection between concrete slab and steel beam. The concrete slab and steel beam act
individually.
2) Full Interaction: A beam where the connectors are infinitely stiff is said to have "full interaction". In this type of connection
there is no slip between concrete slab and steel beam.
3) Partial Interaction: A beam where the connection is relatively flexible is said to have "partial interaction". In this type of
connections there is slip between concrete slab and steel beam. The shear connector deforms in this case.

Composite steel beam – concrete slab interaction

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 797
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VI June 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com

IX. ANSYS MODELS

A. Simply Supported Composite beam
DATAS
Thickness of slab- 125 mm
Partition load – 1.5 KN/m2 Floor finish load – 0.5 KN/m2
Imposed load- 3 KN/m2
fck – 30 N/mm2
fy – 415 N/mm2
Density of concrete – 24 KN/m3
Sectional properties:- ISMB 450
D – 450 mm Zx – 1350 x 103 mm3
tf – 17.4 mm ry – 30.1 mm
tw – 9.4 mm
Ix – 303.9 x 106 mm4
Iy – 8.34 x 106 mm4

1) Finite Element Mesh model

2) Total Deformtion model

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 798
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VI June 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com

3) Maximum Principle Stress model

4) Maximum Principle Strain model

B. Steel Concrete Composite Beam

1) Finite Element Mesh model

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 799
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VI June 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com

2) Total Deformtion Model

3) Maximum Principle Stress model

4) Maximum Principle Strain model

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 800
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VI June 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com

X. SHEAR CONNECTORS BY ANSYS SOFTWARE

A. Analysis Of Tee Connector

Deflected shape of T shape ( 100 x 100 x 10 )

Tee Connector Analysis Result

ANALYSIS OF TEE SHEAR CONNECTROR
M-20 GRADE M-30 GRADE M-40 GRADE
TOTAL DEFORMATION 1.2858 1.5224 1.6644
EQUIVALENT STRESS 795.3 Mpa 941.48 Mpa 1029.5 Mpa
EQUIVALENT STRAIN 0.0042913 0.0050812 0.0055551

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 801
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VI June 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com

B. Analysis Of Channel Connector

Channel section Analysis Results

CHANNEL SECTION CONCRETE GRADE D B tf tw LOAD DEFORMATION (mm ) STRESS (Mpa ) STRAIN
ISMC 75 M-20 75 40 7.3 4.4 159 0.6639 169.33 0.000847
M-30 75 40 7.3 4.4 193 0.8059 205.54 0.001029
M-40 75 40 7.3 4.4 218 0.91032 232.14 0.0011614
ISMC 100 M-20 100 50 7.5 4.7 169 0.42671 67.992 0.0003021
M-30 100 50 7.5 4.7 204 0.51472 82.073 0.00041064
M-40 100 50 7.5 4.7 228 0.57528 91.738 0.0004587
ISMC 125 M-20 125 65 8.1 5 184 0.76441 83.958 0.00041992
M-30 125 65 8.1 5 219 0.90982 99.928 0.000492
M-40 125 65 8.1 5 243 1.0095 110.08 0.0005542

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 802
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VI June 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com

C. Analysis Of Headed Stud Connector

Headed Stud connector @ 22 mm dia

Headed Stud Connector Results

DIAMETER HEIGHT CONCRETE GRADE LOAD (KN ) DEFORMATION (mm) STRESS (Mpa ) STRAIN
13mm 62mm M-20 23 0.8265 1750.1 0.0091
13mm 62mm M-30 28 1.0013 2103.6 0.01101
13mm 62mm M-40 31 1.1106 2358.3 0.01225
16 mm 75 mm M-20 47 4.411 4359.1 0.02193
16 mm 75cmm M-30 49 4.5988 4544.9 0.02286
16 mm 75 mm M-40 54 5.068 5008.3 0.0252
20mm 100mm M-20 57 7.3381 7506.3 0.03982
20mm 100mm M-30 68 8.7542 8754.9 0.04975
20mm 100mm M-40 75 9.6554 9856.2 0.0524
22mm 100mm M-20 70 11.17 7309.2 0.0383
22mm 100mm M-30 85 13.572 8875.9 0.04657
22mm 100mm M-40 94 15.007 9815.7 0.0514

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 803
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VI June 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com

XI. CONCLUSIONS
1) The FE model developed considers the linear and nonlinear material parameters of the shear stud and concrete.
2) The ANSYS model results have been validated and are extremely close to the published results. According to the convergence
study, when the mesh size drops, the results tend to increase and are significantly different from the findings obtained from the
large meshing size described in the literature.
3) As stud diameter grows, so does load carrying capacity.
4) Based on the finite element analysis results, it can be determined that the channel type shear connection has less deformation
than the other types and the headstud type connector has the most deformation for the given load.
5) The FE model developed considers the linear and nonlinear material parameters of the shear stud and concrete.
6) The ANSYS model results have been validated and are extremely close to the published results. According to the convergence
study, when the mesh size drops, the results tend to increase and are significantly different from the findings obtained from the
large meshing size described in the literature.
7) As stud diameter grows, so does load carrying capacity.
8) Based on the finite element analysis results, it can be determined that the channel type shear connection has less deformation
than the other types and the headstud type connector has the most deformation for the given load.

REFERENCES
[1] Baran E. and Topkaya C. "Behavior of steel—concrete partially composite beams with channel type shear connectors". Journal of Constructional Steel
Research 2014; 97: pp. 69—78.
[2] Crisinel M. and Marimon F. "A new simplified method for the design of composite slabs". Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2004; 60, pp. 481-491
[3] Chakrabarti A., Sheikh AH., Griffith M. and Oehlers DJ. "Analysis of composite beams with longitudinal and transverse partial interactions using higher order
beam theory". International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 2012; 59: pp. 115—125.
[4] Chakrabarti A., Sheikh AH., Griffith M. and Oehlers DJ. "Analysis of composite beams with partial shear interactions using a higher order beam theory"
.Engineering Structures 2012; 36: pp. 283-291.
[5] Johnson, RP. "Composite structures of steel and concrete", Vol. 1, 2nd Ed., Blackwell Scientific Publications, Ltd., Oxford, U.K. 1994.
[6] Lam D and El-Lobody E. "Behavior of Headed Stud Shear Connectors in Composite Beam". J. Struct. Eng. 2005; 131: pp. 96-107.
[7] Handbook on Composite Construction-Multi-Storey Buildings- Part-3,(2002),Institute for Steel Development and Growth (INSDAG)
[8] BS 5950 (Part 3),Design of Simple and Continuous Beams, British Standards Institution, London
[9] Handbook on Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other than Earthquake )for Buildings and Structures ( IS : 875(Part 1) – 1987),Bureau of Indian Standards,
New Delhi, 1989.
[10] Handbook on Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other than Earthquake )for Buildings and Structures ( IS : 875(Part 2) – 1987),Bureau of Indian Standards ,
New Delhi ,1989.
[11] Handbook on Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other than Earthquake )for Buildings and Structures ( IS : 875(Part 3) – 1987),Bureau of Indian Standards ,
New Delhi, 1989.
[12] Handbook on Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures ( IS : 1893(Part 1) – 2002 ),Bureau of Indian Standards , New Delhi, 1989...
[13] Design Aids (for Reinforced Concrete) to IS 456 :1978 ,Special Publication SP : 16,Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi,1980
[14] IS 11384 -1985 Code book for CODE OF PRACTICE FOR COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION IN STRUCTURAL STEEL AND CONCRETE

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 804