0% found this document useful (0 votes)
258 views

Flood Frequency Analysis Estimation of Design H.F.L. of River Tipkai AT RCC Bridge Khoraghat Gauge Site

This document provides a flood frequency analysis to determine the design flood level for a river in India. Historical flood level data from multiple years is presented and analyzed using the Log Pearson Type III method. The analysis finds that for a 50-year return period, the design flood level is 33.78 meters. This level will be used for raising and strengthening a bridge crossing on the river to withstand more extreme flooding events.

Uploaded by

NILRATAN SARKAR
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
258 views

Flood Frequency Analysis Estimation of Design H.F.L. of River Tipkai AT RCC Bridge Khoraghat Gauge Site

This document provides a flood frequency analysis to determine the design flood level for a river in India. Historical flood level data from multiple years is presented and analyzed using the Log Pearson Type III method. The analysis finds that for a 50-year return period, the design flood level is 33.78 meters. This level will be used for raising and strengthening a bridge crossing on the river to withstand more extreme flooding events.

Uploaded by

NILRATAN SARKAR
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

FLOOD FREQUENCY ANALYSIS

ESTIMATION OF DESIGN H.F.L. OF RIVER TIPKAI

AT RCC bridge Khoraghat Gauge Site :-


Sl No. Year HFL LWL
1 1988 30.33
2 1989 29.97
3 1990 30.05
4 1991 29.96
5 1992 29.80
6 1993 30.91
7 1994 29.40
8 1995 30.26
9 1996 30.25
10 1997 30.17
11 1998 30.39
12 1999 30.36 27.44
13 2000 30.14
14 2001 30.02
15 2002 30.09 27.14
16 2003 30.26
17 2004 30.37 27.90
18 2005 30.07
19 2006 29.90 26.76
20 2007 30.95 26.58
21 2008 30.39
22 2009 30.40 26.02
23 2010 30.29 27.56
24 2011 29.93 26.74
25 2012 30.08 27.04
26 2013 29.92 26.62
27 2014 30.10 26.07
28 2015 30.22 26.42
29 2016 30.78 26.24
30 2017 30.80 26.05
31 2018 30.02 27.40
32 2019 30.13 26.12
DESIGN
FLOOD FREQUENCY ANALYSIS :

In order to determine the design H.F.L. at the project site of work,flood frequency analysis have been
carried out by Log Pearson Method Type- III which is best fitted for tributaries . The design for 50
years return period as recommended is found out analytically which is given below .

DESIGN CALCULATION FOR DESIGN H.F.L.


LOG PEARSON TYPEIII METHOD FOR 50 YEAR RETURN PERIOD

Rank Year Annual Peak LogY Y'=∑Log Y/N Y-Y'


HFL in m (Y) (Y- Y')2 (Y-Y')3

1 2007 33.78 1.5286596452 1.519015694141 0.009644 9.30058E-05 8.96943316E-07


2 1993 33.74 1.5281450783 1.519015694141 0.0091294 8.33457E-05 7.60894492E-07
3 2017 33.63 1.5267268673 1.519015694141 0.0077112 5.94622E-05 4.58523258E-07
4 2016 33.61 1.5264685125 1.519015694141 0.0074528 5.55445E-05 4.13963075E-07
5 2009 33.23 1.5215303413 1.519015694141 0.0025146 6.32345E-06 1.5901246E-08
6 1998 33.22 1.5213996281 1.519015694141 0.0023839 5.68314E-06 1.35482334E-08
7 2008 33.22 1.5213996281 1.519015694141 0.0023839 5.68314E-06 1.35482334E-08
8 2004 33.20 1.5211380837 1.519015694141 0.0021224 4.50454E-06 9.56038328E-09
9 1999 33.19 1.5210072524 1.519015694141 0.0019916 3.96630E-06 7.89912619E-09
10 1988 33.16 1.5206145219 1.519015694141 0.0015988 2.55625E-06 4.08700362E-09
11 2010 33.12 1.5200903281 1.519015694141 0.0010746 1.15484E-06 1.24102833E-09
12 1995 33.09 1.5196967672 1.519015694141 0.0006811 4.63860E-07 3.15922842E-10
13 2003 33.09 1.5196967672 1.519015694141 0.0006811 4.63860E-07 3.15922842E-10
14 1996 33.08 1.5195655009 1.519015694141 0.0005498 3.02287E-07 1.66199678E-10
15 2015 33.05 1.5191714638 1.519015694141 0.0001558 2.42642E-08 3.77962565E-12
16 1997 33.00 1.5185139399 1.519015694141 -0.000502 2.51757E-07 -1.26320319E-10
17 2000 32.97 1.5181189471 1.519015694141 -0.000897 8.04155E-07 -7.21123742E-10
18 2019 32.96 1.517987203 1.519015694141 -0.001028 1.05779E-06 -1.08793171E-09
19 2014 32.93 1.5175917307 1.519015694141 -0.001424 2.02767E-06 -2.88733056E-09
20 2002 32.92 1.5174598265 1.519015694141 -0.001556 2.42072E-06 -3.76632603E-09
21 2012 32.91 1.5173278823 1.519015694141 -0.001688 2.84871E-06 -4.80808451E-09
22 2005 32.90 1.5171958979 1.519015694141 -0.00182 3.31166E-06 -6.02654294E-09
23 1990 32.88 1.5169318089 1.519015694141 -0.002084 4.34258E-06 -9.04943399E-09
24 2001 32.85 1.5165353739 1.519015694141 -0.00248 6.15199E-06 -1.52589017E-08
25 2018 32.85 1.5165353739 1.519015694141 -0.00248 6.15199E-06 -1.52589017E-08
26 1989 32.80 1.5158738437 1.519015694141 -0.003142 9.87122E-06 -3.10139097E-08
27 1991 32.79 1.5157414167 1.519015694141 -0.003274 1.07209E-05 -3.51031783E-08
28 2011 32.76 1.5153438931 1.519015694141 -0.003672 1.34821E-05 -4.95036733E-08
29 2013 32.75 1.5152113043 1.519015694141 -0.003804 1.44734E-05 -5.50623865E-08
30 2006 32.73 1.5149460053 1.519015694141 -0.00407 1.65624E-05 -6.74036808E-08
31 1992 32.63 1.5136170738 1.519015694141 -0.005399 2.91451E-05 -1.57343339E-07
32 1994 32.23 1.5082603055 1.519015694141 -0.010755 1.15678E-04 -1.24416598E-06
∑Y= ∑Y'= LogX/N ∑ (Y-Y')2= ∑(Y-Y')3=
1057.27 48.608502213 5.61787E-04 8.98324E-07

Calculation for Cs Value

μ=∑(Y-Y')³)/N
∑(Y-Y')³) 8.98324E-07
∑(Y-Y')³)/N= 2.80726E-08
μ = 2.80726E-08
Sy=√(∑(Y-Y)²/(N-1)
(Y-Y')² = 5.61787E-04
(Y-Y')²/N-1= 1.81221E-05
√(Y-Y')²/N-1= 0.00425701157700753
Sy = 0.00425701157700753
N²/(N-1)(N-2)= 1.1010752688172
μ/Sy³= 0.363888737580904
Cs=N²/(N-1)(N-2)xμ/Sy³
.= 0.400668889551447

Calculation of K value from Log Pearson Type-III table for 25 years return period

For K value Cs Range T50 range


0.3 0.4 2.211 2.261
difference 0.1 0.05
value for 0.100668889551 0.05033444478

For Cs value K value


0.30 2.211
Now adding for the difference
0.1006688896 2.2613

Y=KxSy+Y'
Y' 1.519015694141
Sy 0.004257011577
K 2.2613
Y= 1.528642221052
X=antilog Y 33.78

Therefore, Design HFL at Gauge site = 33.78 M

Executive Engineer
Dubri W.R. Division
Dhubri
DESIGN

FLOOD FREQUENCY ANALYSIS :


Name of Work :Raising and strengthening on the R/B of Desam river including construction and repairing of
sluice culverts from Ghugulani to Desam outfall
In order to determine the design H.F.L. at the proposed project sites(in river Desam), flood frequency
analysis have been carried out by Log Pearson Method Type- III which is best fitted for Brahmaputra
and its tributaries . The design for 50 years return period as recommended by the Rashtriya Barh
Ayog is found out analytically which is given below . ( Design HFL in analysis of river Desam at
Ghugulani PWD.Wooden Bridge Crossing).
YEAR DATE H.F.L. Y = Log ( Xi ) Ŷ Y–Ŷ (Y – Ŷ ) 2 (Y – Ŷ ) 3
### 27-May 112.88 2.0526170007 2.051412608911 0.0012044 1.45055969E-06 1.74704225E-09
### 21-Jun 112.82 2.0523860954 2.051412608911 0.0009735 9.47675924E-07 9.22549699E-10
### 16-Jul 112.72 2.0520009801 2.051412608911 0.0005884 3.46180658E-07 2.03682726E-10
### 20-Aug 112.7 2.051923916 2.051412608911 0.0005113 2.61434987E-07 1.33673574E-10
### 9-Jul 112.63 2.0516540841 2.051412608911 0.0002415 5.83102735E-08 1.40804851E-11
### 9-Aug 112.66 2.0517697469 2.051412608911 0.0003571 1.27547543E-07 4.5552073E-11
### 25-Aug 112.62 2.051615523 2.051412608911 0.0002029 4.11741297E-08 8.35481124E-12
### 7-Aug 112.58 2.0514612443 2.051412608911 4.864E-05 2.36540345E-09 1.15042375E-13
### 11-Aug 112.54 2.0513069108 2.051412608911 -0.000106 1.11720868E-08 -1.18086826E-12
### 30-Aug 112.49 2.0511139168 2.051412608911 -0.000299 8.92169903E-08 -2.66484131E-11
### 28-Aug 112.44 2.0509208369 2.051412608911 -0.000492 2.41839676E-07 -1.18929975E-10
### 10-Aug 112.44 2.0509208369 2.051412608911 -0.000492 2.41839676E-07 -1.18929975E-10
### 23-Jun 112.42 2.050843581 2.051412608911 -0.000569 3.23792812E-07 -1.84247161E-10
### 19-Jul 112.40 2.0507663112 2.051412608911 -0.000646 4.17700688E-07 -2.69958985E-10
### 9-May 112.38 2.0506890278 2.051412608911 -0.000724 5.23569683E-07 -3.78845154E-10
### 26-Jun 112.36 2.0506117305 2.051412608911 -0.000801 6.41406181E-07 -5.13688344E-10
32.822601743 5.72578641E-06 1.46262179E-09
No. of year = N = 16
Mean = Ŷ = ∑ Log (Xi) / N = 2.05141260891

Standard deviation = Sd = √ ∑ ( Y – Ŷ )2 / ( N – 1) = 0.0006178342

μ3 = ∑( Y – Ŷ )3 / N = 9.1414E-11

Skewness Co-efficient = Cs = { (N2 / ( N-1) x ( N -2) } x { μ3 / ( Sd )2 } = 0.472516415058

{ (N2 / ( N-1) x ( N -2) } = 1.219047619048


Ret { μ3 / ( Sd )2 } = 0.387611121727
urn
Logrithimic Log X = Ŷ
Peri Skewne K -From Standard + K x Sd X =Antilog X in
od ss Co- Person table K x Sd
deviation Sd in metre
T efficient Cs =0.565 metre
(yea
r)
25 0.47252 1.90202976 0.0006178342 0.001175139028 2.0526 112.88
50 0.47252 2.29781 0.0006178342 0.001419664284 2.0528 112.94
100 0.47252 2.66704 0.0006178342 0.001647786244 2.0531 113.01

Executive Engineer,
Dibrugarh W.R Division
Dibrugarh.
For 25 years return period

X= 0.60 1.939 1.9020298


a= 0.472516415 ?
Y= 0.50 1.91

For 50 years return period

X= 0.60 2.359 2.2978079


a= 0.472516415 ?
Y= 0.50 2.311

For 100 years return period

X= 0.60 2.755 2.6670363


a= 0.472516415 ?
Y= 0.50 2.686

112.88 2.0526
112.94 2.0528
113.01 2.0531
95.52 1.98009431379
95.52 1.98009431379

112.88 2.05261700075
33.81
33.77
33.66
33.64
33.26
33.25
33.25
33.23
33.22
33.19
33.15
33.12
33.12
33.11
33.08
33.03
33.00
32.99
32.96
32.95
32.94
32.93
32.91
32.88
32.88
32.83
32.82
32.79
32.78
32.76
32.66
32.26 32

2.80726E-08
1.75558E-05

0.004257011577008
1.13833992094862

0.400668889551447
0.400668889551447

103.98 0
86 27000

17.98 27000
1 1501.669

0 98.75
13000 89.85
13000 8.9

1460.674

#REF! #REF!

n
Name of scheme :- Immediate measures for restoration of Boraibari Bazar and its adjoining area from flood damage
of river Tipkai on its Right Bank under SDRF for 2021-22.

Design of Apron & Pitching


According to IS code 8408 : 1994

Design Parameters at Athani 300 m D/S of Khoraghat gauge site


DHFL at RCC bridge Khoraghat Gauge Site 0m = 33.78 m LWL
River Gradient = 1 in 4000
So, DHFL at Chainage 300 m D/S 33.70 m
Observed HFL=33.78M and DHFL=33.67M, (33.78M>33.67M), hence consider observed HFL.
L.W.L at Chainage 300 m R/B = 28.70 m

Maximum observed velocity, v = 2.83 m/s


Average Flow depth at bank full stage, d 6.25 m
Specific gravity of sand in geobags, Ss = 1.9
According to Lacy's, the scour depth below DHFL, Ds = 1.33x(q /f)1/3
2

Where, q is discharge intensity = vxd = 17.69 m3/s/m


Mean Dia of river bed material d = 0.14 mm
Silt Factor f= 1.76*(d)1/2 = 0.66

So, scour depth below DHFL, Ds = 10.38 m


Maximum Scour Depth below DHFL, Dmax = 1.5 x Ds = 15.57 m
Max. Scour depth below LWL = Dmax-(DHFL-LWL)= 10.57 m
Width of Launching Apron, W = 1.5x Max. Scour depth belo W' = 15.85 m

Considering Bank Pitching using geo-bags of size 0.90mx0.60mx0.15m (Type-A geo-bags) in loose
Specific gravity of g-bags (wet packed with silt) = 1.9
Angle of sloping bank(2H:1V) θ = 26.57 0 0.4636
Angle of repose, Φ = 30 0 0.5236
Value of K=[1-Sin θ/ Sin Φ ]
2 2 1/2
= 0.447
Weight of geo-bags (Min. reqd) W =0.02323*Ss*V6/(K*(Ss-1)3 = 69.55 kg
Unit weight of geo-bag filled with dry sand = 126 kg
126kg >69.55kg, hence safe
The minimum thickness of bank pitching from negative head criteria 't' = v2 / [2 x g x (Ss - 1)]
Where g is acceleration due to gravity = 9.81 m² / sec
Hence, t = 0.45 m
Adopt 3 layers of Type-A geobags for slope pitching
Therefore thickness of pitching (3 layers Type-A geobags) = 0.45 m

Thickness of launching apron T = 1.5 x thickness of pitching = 0.68 m

Adopting 6 layers of geobags for apron, hence thickness of apron = 6 x 0.15m = 0.90m

Hence length of apron =


15.85 x 0.68
m
0.9

= 11.98 m
Say = 12.00 m
Width of Launching Apron, 'W' = 12.00 m
Thickness of launching apron 'T' = 0.90 m

Executive Engineer
Dubri W.R. Division
Dhubri
26.02 7.76

6500

0.5 2.0

54

You might also like