Technical Report Route Guidance
Technical Report Route Guidance
Guidance
Assessment............................................................................................................................ 6
Results.................................................................................................................................. 13
Appeals................................................................................................................................. 14
If you wish to apply for Technician membership (EngTech MICE), please read our Technician
guidance.
The TRR route lets you use the knowledge you have gained through your experience to show that
you are at the level you would like to apply for.
The level of membership you can apply for depends on your experience and competence, as well
as your understanding of engineering principles. How much experience you need depends on the
academic qualifications you have which the table below provides a useful guide.
Apart from the receipt for the application fee which should be paid online, you must email all
documents as a single PDF file of no more than 5mb to [email protected]
The initial assessment is to determine your eligibility to proceed to stage 2. It is an opportunity for
ICE to provide feedback on your draft synopsis to ensure that your proposed technical report
covers the right areas and to allow you the opportunity to produce a technical report of the
appropriate standard.
Mentor
To apply for the Technical Report Route, you must have a mentor to support you. Your mentor
plays an important role at all stages of the process. They make sure your technical report (and
synopsis) shows that you have an understanding of how to apply engineering principles, and that
you demonstrate the required professional attributes in your experience report and continuing
professional development (CPD) documents.
Your mentor will also help you prepare for the Academic and Professional Interviews. They will
need to provide a short note to confirm that they are acting as your mentor. They should also read
this guidance document.
In no more than 750 words, it must show how this knowledge and experience demonstrates that
you have achieved the required academic level, rather than describing projects you have worked
on.
Appendix A outlines the academic competencies you need to demonstrate, and Appendix B gives
Two-page CV
Your CV should show your personal details, academic achievements and brief details of jobs you
have worked on, as well as your roles and responsibilities. We are particularly interested in work
you have done in the last five years.
Try to include examples of problems you have encountered, unusual or extensive experience you
have gained, and lessons you have learned. You need to demonstrate all the attributes as
described in Appendix C.
Academic qualifications
You need to provide certified copies of any academic qualifications you have gained, together with
certified English translations, where applicable.
To certify a copy of your certificate, your university lecturer, senior member of your employing
company, a solicitor, or a corporate ICE member needs to write the following:
“I confirm this to be a true copy of this applicant's qualification.”
▪ Signature:
▪ Name (clearly printed):
▪ Date:
▪ Employing organisation/university or college:
▪ Position:
▪ A contact telephone number or email address:
▪ ICE membership number (if applicable):
We may contact your university, college or professional institution to verify your qualification. You
give us permission to do so by signing your initial assessment application.
Assessment
We will email you within 12 weeks of receipt of your documents to tell you that you can proceed to
stage 2 or ask you for more information. This might include extra technical and professional
information, or we may need to discuss something with your mentor.
After your initial assessment is approved, you have one year to send us your application. If you
leave it later, you will need to start the process again.
While face to face Professional Reviews remain the preferred approach, ICE can now offer remote
Professional Reviews, via video conference, for international candidates:
▪ Whose specialism does not match any of the available reviewers at that location
If there are no suitable dates or locations listed please contact the Professional Reviews team and
we can discuss alternative arrangements.
Sponsors
Your application must be supported by three sponsors, who can confirm your suitability for
membership. To do so, they must complete a sponsor questionnaire and upload it into the
Professional Reviews sponsor’s portal a minimum of one week before the application opening
date of the centre/location which you are applying for. It is your duty to ensure this has been
completed.
You need to select one sponsor to be your lead sponsor; this person is likely to be your mentor.
They have additional responsibilities and play a particularly important role in the success of your
application.
Individual Requirements
You should state any individual requirements you would like considered at your interview – for
example, a disability or a security issue. You can find out more in Appendix D.
Unspent convictions
No person with an unspent conviction relating to a Serious Criminal Offence* will be admitted to
any grade of membership unless there are special circumstances that show beyond reasonable
doubt that the person is a fit and proper person to be admitted to membership of the Institution.
If you have an unspent conviction relating to a serious criminal offence, please complete the
unspent convictions form which must also be signed by your sponsors, and submitted with your
application, a member of staff will contact you directly and in confidence.
*“Serious Criminal Offence” means an offence involving dishonesty or deception or any offence
punishable by a Court of competent jurisdiction by a term of imprisonment of 12 months or more
(whether or not any custodial sentence is in fact imposed).
All documents (except the sponsor questionnaires and receipt for the application fee) should be
included in your initial application– in the order noted above – within a single PDF file of no more
than 5mb. You must submit the application through the Professional Reviews upload portal
completing all details and confirming the checklist before upload. If you are experiencing issues
with the site, please call us on +44 (0) 207 665 2344 or [email protected].
▪ Your three sponsors must each complete a sponsor’s questionnaire and upload the
questionnaire through the Professional Reviews sponsor’s portal a minimum of one week
before the application opening date of the centre/location you are applying for.
▪ An application fee must be paid – you can find more details on the fees page of our website
You will be emailed the names of your reviewers, as well as full details of the time, date and
venue of your Professional Review approximately four weeks before the Review. Under no
circumstances should you contact your reviewers directly.
Conflict of interest
Your reviewers should not be connected to either you or your employer. If you know one of your
reviewers or feel there may be a conflict of interest, you should let us know immediately on +44 (0)
207 665 2344 or at [email protected]
Your reviewers will also have been given the opportunity to identify any conflicts prior to you
being notified of who they are.
You can find details on how to format and send us these documents at the end of this section.
You should upload your submission in a single pdf file to the Professional Reviews upload portal at
least 15 full working days before your Professional Review date. If you miss the deadline or your
submission is incomplete your Professional Review may be deferred.
You should include the successes and failures in relation to the application of engineering
principles, and the lessons you learned. If appropriate, appendices can be used for supporting
details.
The technical report is deemed to cover attributes 1 and 2 which can be found in Appendix C. It
should not include examples of your professional competence – for example, management skills
and commercial awareness – as this will be covered in your experience report.
It’s up to you and your mentor to structure the report to suit your experience.
These records must include current formal training related to health safety and welfare (attribute
group 6 in Appendix A).
Before applying for your Review, you need to complete a minimum of 90 hours effective learning
time at Incorporated Engineering (IEng) level and 180 at Chartered Engineer (CEng) level.
For more information, please read our CPD guidance.
Important information
You must submit your submission in a single PDF file through the Professional Reviews upload
portal completing all details and confirming the checklist before you upload at least 15 full working
days before your Professional Review date. If you are experiencing issues with the site, please call
us on +44 (0) 207 665 2344 or email [email protected].
The PDF document must be submitted at least 15 full working days before your review. If you miss
the deadline your Professional Review may be deferred.
Admission Procedure 3
Your name will be published on the ICE website for a minimum of 28 days in accordance with
Admission Procedure 3.
Academic Interview
The Academic Interview lasts around 90 minutes. The aim of the Academic Interview is to find out
whether your experience has given you the same level of academic competence in your technical
area as someone with the required educational base.
First, you must give a presentation of up to 30 minutes, based on your technical report. Your
presentation must expand on the report, rather than simply repeat information in it. You may use
visual aids such as flip portfolios (not larger than A3) to illustrate the presentation. You can also
use a laptop computer, but a power source isn’t supplied, and we won’t be able to help you with
any technical problems you might encounter.
Your reviewers will then ask you a series of questions about the information in your technical
report. The interview will last around 60 minutes.
After your Academic Interview, your reviewers will adjourn to determine whether you have satisfied
the educational base for the grade of membership and level of Engineering Council registration you
have applied for. You will be called back in to the interview room and they will tell you whether or
not you have been successful. If you have been successful, you will move on to the Professional
Interview.
If you have been unsuccessful, the process will end, and we will write to you informing you of the
reasons.
Professional Interview
The Professional Interview lasts around 60 minutes.
The Professional Interview is based on your experience report. It is an opportunity to show that you
have the professional competence and attributes required for the grade of membership you have
applied for (see Appendix C). If you are already a member at Incorporated Engineer (IEng) level,
you will only be assessed against the attributes at Chartered (CEng) level.
You need to be aware that engineering activity can have impacts on the environment, commerce,
▪ At MPR, the objective is to ascertain that you can produce straightforward documents
without assistance from others
▪ At CPR and CPRP, the aim is to test your ability to organise your thoughts and present
them logically and clearly.
Although it is not a direct test of engineering knowledge, sufficient understanding and knowledge of
the professional subject matter is required. Factual errors or lack of knowledge could affect the
outcome, but examples of well-reasoned personal opinion will not.
* All candidates who make an application to sit the Technical Report Route from 1 January 2020 will
be required to undertake a Written Exercise regardless of the amount of experience they have.
You will find full guidance on the written exercise, use of a laptop for your written exercise, and
how to avoid plagiarism and collusion in Appendix E.
Results
We will let you know when to expect your result, which will be sent by email. Providing you select
the tick-box on the application form, if you are successful your name will be published on ICE’s
website and will subsequently appear on the ‘New Civil Engineer’ website.
If you are unsuccessful at your Professional Review you will be given the reasons why.
Candidates have the right to appeal where they feel there was an error in the process, and in
cases of unforeseen events. Appeals must be received within two months of the date of your result
letter. Appeals after this date will not be considered.
If you plan to appeal, we recommend that you read our appeals guidance and contact your
Membership Support Team as listed below:
▪ If you are based in the UK, please email [email protected] or call +44 (0) 121 227
5948 for help.
▪ If you are based in Hong Kong, please email [email protected] for help.
▪ If you are based anywhere else please email [email protected] or call +44 (0) 207
665 2006 for help.
If you were successful at the Academic Interview but unsuccessful at the Professional Interview
you will need to follow the process from Stage 2, but you do not have to submit the Technical
Report. There will be no Academic Interview, just a Professional Interview which will cover
attributes 3-9 and, a written exercise.
1. Science and mathematics: Have knowledge and understanding of the mathematical, scientific
and engineering principles that underpin civil engineering. Be able to undertake and properly
apply engineering analysis to problems using relevant information technology, as well as being
able to implement engineering processes and technologies.
2. Design: Possess the knowledge, understanding and skills to define problems, identify
constraints and contribute to the design and development of engineering solutions in a practical
context. Ensure that designs are appropriate to meet their purposes or applications.
2. Geotechnics
▪ Establishment of soil shear strengths, settlement, active/passive pressures or pore water
pressure
▪ Stability of slopes and embankments
▪ Pressures developed in soil masses under different types of foundation
▪ Principle of flotation of structures and seepage under structures etc.
3. Foundations
▪ Calculation of pressure distribution beneath foundations, transmission of pile loads to strata
and effect of pile interaction
▪ Stability of excavations, de-watering and performance of cofferdams etc.
5. Steel structures
▪ Design principles and modes of failure of beams and columns
▪ The principles of rigid frame and simple frame construction and transmission of horizontal
forces to the foundations through frame action or bracing
▪ Plastic hinge formation in portals
▪ Composite action between beams and slabs
▪ Performance and use of bolted or welded joints etc.
7. Transportation
▪ Principles of transportation modelling – for priority junctions, roundabouts, signalled
junctions
▪ Algorithms used to develop network models – trip generation modal split, distribution,
assignment, microsimulation
▪ The basics of junction and highway design, road-safety analysis, signal control
8. Highways
▪ The principles of pavement design, from CBR to road surface friction course
▪ Highway and junction design: vertical and horizontal curvature, super-elevation, drainage,
sight distances, safety features of highways and highway design
9. Construction
▪ Criteria for plant and equipment selection
▪ Pressures on formwork, scaffold and temporary works design principles
▪ Engineering principles involved in design of temporary works such as foundations and
roads
▪ Concrete mix design and quality control processes
▪ Soil testing etc.
At any Review you must have had responsible and relevant experience at a level such that
you can demonstrate the attributes shown in the table below.
The interpretation of Attributes 1 and 2 will relate to your fields of work as indicated to the
reviewers on your application form. You must demonstrate a sound understanding of core
engineering principles in those fields, particularly if you do not hold the educational
requirement necessary for Engineering Council registration. The reviewers will judge your
level of attainment of Attributes 3 to 9 with regard to their relative importance within your
fields of work.
As a prospective professional civil engineer, in order to fulfil your obligation to society and
to meet the requirements of Health, Safety and Welfare legislation, you must have a sound
knowledge and understanding of the construction process (1) together with the activities
connected to it. You must have an appreciation of, and be able to identify and manage,
risks to all those engaged and affected by the design, construction, operation, use,
maintenance and demolition of any works. For those whose experience includes the
construction process, site experience will ordinarily be required.
Notes:
1. The construction process is held to include the conception, design, construction,
commissioning, maintenance, decommissioning, removal, management and procurement
of civil engineering works.
2. All Reviews for Engineering Council registration will be conducted in English, subject to the
provision of the Welsh Language Act 1993 and any regulations which may be made in
implementation of European Union Directives on free movement of labour.
▪ Don’t state building numbers or names – it’s sufficient to say ‘nuclear facility’ or
‘nuclear store’
▪ Don’t include photographs or other images which reveal the location of buildings and
facilities
Familiarise yourself with the Engineering Council’s guidance note on Security (published May
2016).
You should also let us know if you believe your reviewers need security clearance.
Your reviewers will draft two questions and you must answer one. The questions will be unique to
you, based on your areas of experience, and appropriate to your level of work-based knowledge
and responsibility. However, you will still need an appreciation of broad industry and society-
related topics, which you should try to gain through your experience at work, general reading, CPD
study and discussions with colleagues.
Below, you will find a list of potential question topics within broad subject areas. However, this list
is not exhaustive, and you may be given a question from a different area, relevant to your
experience.
You are expected to show that you can develop ideas and support them with reasoned opinion.
Your answer should follow a logical structure, either as an essay or a report. It does not have to be
a polished article, but consistent with a ‘first draft’.
The written exercise is a closed book exercise and you will only be allowed to bring in 2 sides of A4
(hard copy) as reference material.
You are advised to prepare a plan for your written exercise although this will not be marked. A
plan will help you formulate a coherent argument and can help your reviewers to see your thought
process.
Please note: All candidates who make an application to sit the Technical Report Route from 1
January 2020 will be required to undertake a Written Exercise.
Assessment
Your written exercise will be assessed for:
▪ Knowledge and relevance
▪ Use of English (grammar, spelling, punctuation and syntax)
Discussion groups
Organised discussion groups can help develop your writing skills and encourage debates between
engineers. Your Membership Recruitment Team (in the UK and Hong Kong) or regional
representative (in other parts of the world) can give you more information about discussion groups.
If you are based in the UK, please email [email protected] or call +44 (0)121
237 3648 / 3649.
If you are based anywhere else, please email [email protected] or call +44 (0)207 665
2006.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism is presenting the work of others as your own. This means using words or ideas without
the permission of the original author or authors, and without acknowledgement of the original
author. Plagiarism should be avoided at all stages of your Professional Review, including reports,
drawings, presentations and the written exercise.
Here are some guidelines to help avoid plagiarism:
▪ Don’t cut and paste material from others
▪ Where you have directly quoted others, or the work of others, attribute the source fully and,
where appropriate, use quotation marks. As a rule of thumb, material derived from others
should be considered a quote, unless it is assumed to be common knowledge – for
example, standard equations that are in the public domain
Plagiarism is taken seriously by the ICE. Should there be concerns with your behavior during the
written exercise or with the content of your written exercise the ICE will investigate including using
plagiarism detection software. If this shows significant levels of similarity with any unattributed
sources you will be contacted by the ICE and asked to provide an explanation.
Collusion
In the context of the Professional Review, collusion is any agreement to conceal someone else’s
contribution to your piece of work, when you know that they intend to submit the same material.
The plagiarism guidance above equally applies to avoiding collusion.
Plagiarism and collusion may lead to a ban on applying for ICE membership or, for existing ICE
members, permanent expulsion from ICE membership.
If an allegation of plagiarism or collusion is made relating to your application for membership, your
result may be delayed until an investigation has taken place.
Financial
Management
▪ Re-thinking construction
▪ Quality, health, safety welfare, and environmental management systems
▪ Effective delegation
▪ Team leadership
▪ Communication during the design and construction of civil engineering works
▪ Training/development of staff
▪ Partnering/alliances
▪ Business improvement
▪ Marketing
▪ Site/project management
Societal
Commercial
Technical/academic