THREADED FASTENER

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS

ENGINEERING FUNDAMENTALS

pcb.com/fastener-tech | 1 800 828 8840

Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction: Engineering Fundamentals of the Tightening Process ….......................................... 3
1.1 Energy Transfer....................................................................................................................... 3
1.2 Modeling the Tightening Process………………………………………………………………..... 3
1.3 Where Does the Torque Go? ……………………………………………………………………… 4
1.4 Elastic Torque-Tension Relationship ……………………………………………………………… 5
1.5 Stress/Strain vs. Torque/Tension …………………………………………………………………..5
1.6 Correlation of Stress-Strain and Turn …………………………………………………………….. 6
1.7 Force-Deformation and Torque-Angle Diagrams …………………………………………………7
1.8 Preload-Preload Efficiency Factor ………………………………………………………………….7
1.9 Torque-Tension Correlation Coefficient ……………………………………………………………8
1.10 Thread/Underhead Friction Measurements ……………………………………………………… 8
1.11 Automated Tightening Process …………………………………………………………………… 9
2.0 Torque-Angle-Tension Control …………………………………………………………………………… 9
2.1 Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………………. 9
2.2 Torque-Angle-Signature ……………………………………………………………………………10
2.3 Torque-Angle Signature Analysis …………………………………………………………………11
2.3.1 Tightening Curve ………………………………………………………………………… 12
2.3.2 Elastic Origin ………………………………………………………………………………. 12
2.3.3 Loosening Curve ……………………………………………………………………………12
2.3.4 Beyond Yield ……………………………………………………………………………… 13
2.3.5 Loosening Tendencies …………………………………………………………………… 13
2.3.6 Accurate Measurement …………………………………………………………………… 13
2.3.7 Torque-Angle Signature Analysis Summary …………………………………………….14
2.4 Clamp Force/Strength Considerations ………………………………………………………….. 14
2.5 Modeling the Tightening Process …………………………………………………………………14
2.6 Torque-Tension Coefficient: Nut Factor, K …………………………………………………….. 16
2.7 Experimental Determination of Friction Coefficients ………………………………………….. 17
2.8 Thread/Underhead Friction Coefficient Measurements ……………………………………… 17
2.9 M-Alpha Diagram …………………………………………………………………………………. 18
2.10 FM-Alpha Diagram ……………………………………………………………………………….. 19
2.11 Estimating the Tension-Angle Coefficient ……………………………………………………… 20
2.11.1 Ultrasonic Stretch ……………………………………………………………………….. 20
2.11.2 Strain-Gaged Bolt ………………………………………………………………………. 20
2.11.3 Force Washer …………………………………………………………………………….. 21
2.11.4 Model-Calculation: Estimate of Angle-Tension Coefficient ………………………… 21
2.11.5 Laboratory Measurement of Friction Coefficients …………………………………….. 22
2.11.6 Material Property-Yield ………………………………………………………………….. 23
2.12 Torque-Angle Tension Control Summary ……………………………………………………….. 23
3.0 Torque-Tension Audits …………………………………………………………………………………… 25
3.1 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 25
3.2 Hand Torque Audit-Tool Torque Capability …………………………………………………….. 26
3.3 Tool Torque Capability/ISO 5393 ……………………………………………………………….. 26
3.4 Release Angle-Tension Audit ……………………………………………………………………. 26
3.5 Loosening-Embedment or Loss of Preload ……………………………………………………. 29
3.6 Measurements Verify Fastener Torque and Tension ………………………………………… 29
4.0 Other Strategies ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 33
4.1 Torque-Turn-To-Yield …………………………………………………………………………….. 33
4.2 Prevailing Torque Locknut Signature Analysis ………………………………………………… 33
4.3 Hand Torque Tightness Quality Audits …………………………………………………………. 33
4.3.1 Redefining The Audit ……………………………………………………………………. 34
4.3.2 Hand Torque Audit Qualification ………………………………………………………… 36
5.0 Using Torque Angle Records to Determine Joint Stiffness …………………………………………. 36
6.0 Material Yield Point ……………………………………………………………………………………… 38
7.0 Glossary of Important Terms ………………………………………………………………………….. 38
8.0 References ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 39
2
1.0 Introduction: Engineering Fundamentals of the Tightening Process
The process of tightening threaded fastener assemblies, especially for critical bolted joints, involves
controlling both input torque and angle of turn to achieve the desired result of proper preload of the bolted
assembly. Understanding the role of friction in both the underhead and threaded contact zones is the key
to defining the relationship between torque, angle, and tension.

There can be as many as 200 or more factors that affect the tension created in a bolt when tightening
torque is applied (refer to paragraph 2.2). Fortunately, torque-angle signature curves can be obtained for
most bolted joints.

By combining the torque-angle curves with a few simple calculations and a basic understanding of the
engineering mechanics of threaded fasteners, you can obtain the practical information needed to evaluate
the characteristics of individual fastener tightening processes. The torque-angle curves can also provide
the necessary information to properly qualify the capability of tightening tools to properly tighten a given
fastener.

1.1 Energy Transfer

Tightening threaded fasteners is basically an energy transfer process as shown in Figure 1. The area
under the torque-angle curve is proportional to the energy required to tighten the fastener.

Figure 1 Tightening Fasteners Transfers Energy

1.2 Modeling the Tightening Process

Achieving proper control of the tightening process is
possible only if you understand the relationship between
torque and turn in the development of tension.

Before studying tightening methods, it is necessary to

become familiar with what actually happens when a
fastener is tightened. The process of tightening a
fastener involves turning, advance of the lead screw,
and torque, turning moment, so that preload, tension, is produced in the fastener. The desired result is a
clamping force to hold components together.

Figure 2. Four Zones of the Tightening Process

The most general model of the torque-

turn signature for the fastener tightening
process has four distinct zones as
illustrated in Figure 2.

The first zone is the rundown or

prevailing torque zone that occurs before
the fastener head or nut contacts the
bearing surface.

The second zone is the alignment or

snugging zone wherein the fastener and
joint mating surfaces are drawn into
alignment to achieve a “snug” condition.

3
The third zone is the elastic clamping range, wherein the slope of the torque-angle curve is essentially
constant.

The fourth zone is the post-yield zone, which begins with an inflection point at the end of the elastic
range. Occasionally, this fourth zone can be due to yielding in the joint or gasket, or due to yield of the
threads in the nut or clamped components or nut rather than to yield of the fastener.

NOTE: A more detailed discussion of the four tightening zones is presented in section 2.5.

In the special case where prevailing torque locking features are employed, the model includes an
additional prevailing torque zone. In a more general sense, the prevailing torque can be the result of
frictional drag on the shank or threads due to the misalignment of the parts, to chips or other foreign
material in the threads, or due to out of tolerance threads with unintended interference.

The nonlinear alignment zone is a complex function of the process of drawing together of the mating
threads, bending together of mating parts, and bending of the fastener as a result of non-parallelism of
the bearing surface to the fastener underhead surface. These factors are referred to as macro effects.
The alignment zone also has what is referred to as micro components. The micro effects include contact
stress defections of plating and coatings as well as surface and thread deformations. These effects are
illustrated in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Alignment Zone

1.3 Where Does the Torque Go?

The basic torque distribution for a fastener is illustrated in Figure 4. The torque applied to a fastener is
absorbed in three main areas. First, there is underhead friction, which may absorb 50 percent or more of
the total torque. Thread friction absorbs as much as 40 percent of the applied torque. The final 10 percent

4
of the applied torque develops the clamping force that holds the components together. Thus an increase
in either friction component of 5% can reduce tension by half.

Figure 4. Where Does the Torque Go?

As shown previously, the area under the torque-angle curve

represents the total energy required to tighten a fastener. As
shown in Figure 5, the upper 10 percent of the area on the
curve represents the elastic clamping energy that is providing
the holding power to clamp the parts together. The elastic
clamping energy shown on the torque-angle plot has the
same value as the areas under the bolt and clamped
component lines in the Force-Deformation Diagram (refer to
Figure 9).
Figure 5. Where Does the Fastening Energy Go?

Some additional sources of post-yield

response that can affect the amount of
clamping force are shown in Figure 6.
Figure 6. Sources of Post-Yield Response

1.4 Elastic Torque-Tension Relationship

A practical starting point for all threaded fastener tightening
analysis is to use the basic elastic torque-tension equation,
T = K*D*F, to estimate the relative magnitudes of torque and clamp force. Starting with this equation,
which defines a linear relationship between torque and tension, you can develop models for the tightening
process.

T=KDF
Where:
T = Torque (in-lb)
K = Nut Factor (Ranges from 0.03 to 0.35)
D = Nominal Diameter (inches)
F = Force (lb)
1.5 Stress/Strain vs. Torque/Tension
It is very helpful to picture the approximate equivalence of the stress-strain curve to the torque versus
angle curve as illustrated in Figure 7 (note that the alignment zone has been removed from the torque-
angle diagram). Deformation of the fastener and angle of turn are geometrically related by the following
formula.

5
Figure 7. Relationship of Stress-Strain vs. Torque-Angle

This relationship correlates directly with the stress-

induced total strain in the fastener only when the
fastener is tightened on a joint with infinite stiffness.
Extensive testing has proven that the tension
produced can be shown to be directly proportional
to the angle of turn from the Elastic Origin. The
elastic origin is located by projecting a line tangent
to the elastic portion of the torque-angle curve
backward to zero torque. The total angle of turn is
equal to the compression of the clamped
components plus the stretch of the fastener as shown in Figure 8.

Figure 8. Angle of Turn is Proportional to Clamp Force

1.6 Correlation of Stress-Strain and Turn

The basic relationship of stress to strain in the
elastic region is given by the following
equation.

The stretch of a bolt or metal rod loaded in tension is calculated by use of the following equation.

If the turn-to-tension procedure is used to establish clamping load, it is necessary to know both the spring
rate of the bolt and the spring rate of the clamped components, since turning the bolt stretches the
fastener and compresses the parts being clamped. A simple experimental procedure for estimating ap-
proximate joint and bolt stiffness is outlined in paragraph 5.0.

The slope of the Force-Angle of Turn relationship can be represented by the following equation.

Where:
KB = bolt spring rate (lb/in)
KC = joint spring rate (lb/in)
Taking the first derivative of the basic equation T = K*D*F yields the following relationship.

6
Substituting for ∆F in the Force-Angle of Turn equation results in a Torque-Angle slope equation shown
below that can be used to estimate the spring rate of bolted joints.

The spring rate of the bolt is estimated by the following equation.

Next, the slope of the elastic clamping region of the Torque-Angle Curve, ∆T/∆Θ, is determined from the
curve. If a value for K is assumed, then the spring rate for the joint is calculated as follows.

1.7 Forcer-Deformation and Torque-Angle Diagrams

Similar to the correlation between the material Stress-Strain Diagram and the Torque-Angle Diagram, it is
possible to illustrate correlation between the classic Force-Deformation Diagram and a special Torque-
Angle Diagram shown in Figure 9. This special diagram illustrates the relative angular motion required to
both stretch the fastener and compress the joint. The factors depicted in Figure 9 are identified in Table 1.

Figure 9. Force-Deformation and Torque-Angle Diagrams

1.8 Preload-Preload Efficiency Factor

As can be seen from the Force-Deformation Diagram, the bolted joint responds in a predictable manner
when subjected to external working loads. Preload efficiency factors, based upon the effective spring
rates of the bolt and the clamped elements, are the key to analysis of the fatigue resistance safety factor.
The Preload Efficiency Factor is determined using the following formula.

With the aid of the torque-angle plot obtained from an actual assembly, it is possible to estimate the
preload efficiency factor and calculate an approximate value for the effective spring rate for the clamped
parts.
7
The accuracy of the calculated values for joint stiffness and clamping efficiency factor are dependent
upon the degree of accuracy of the assumed value for K and the effective length, Le, assumed for the
bolt.
Where actual joint torque-angle records are available, the preload efficiency factor can be estimated by
calculating the elastic angle of turn to stretch the bolt, αb, and the angle of turn, αc, over the same torque
range needed to compress the joint.

Refer to paragraph 5.0 for a detailed derivation of this formula and a practical guide for use of torque
angle records to estimate joint stiffness.
The Preload Efficiency Factor, Φ, when multiplied by the external applied load, is used to calculate the
maximum change in bolt loading that can be expected when an external load is applied to the assembly.
This is true only up to the point where the joint separates. Above the separation load, 100 percent of the
external load goes directly on the bolt.

1.9 Torque-Tension Correlation Coefficient

The basic equation, T = K D F, applies to the linear elastic zone of the torque-angle tightening curve, after
due consideration is given to the prevailing torque and alignment zone torque influences. The factor K,
often referred to as the “nut factor,” can be expressed as a combination of three factors: K1, a geometric
factor; K2, a thread friction related factor; and K3, an underhead friction related factor. Figure 10 shows
the mathematical formulas for each of these factors.

Figure 10. Frictional Coefficients

The friction coefficients µt and µc are

key variables in the basic equation.
While there are published tables for
K (i.e., see Bickford), these are
combined values. For more detailed
analysis when designing special
fasteners or solving a specific
problem, it is often desirable or
necessary to have more specific in-
formation on the underhead and
thread friction factors.

It is possible to experimentally
determine the underhead and
thread friction coefficients. Using a
specially designed torque-tension
load cell which measures clamp force and thread torque, it is possible to measure, study and analyze the
frictional losses in the threads and underhead region of fasteners.

1.10 Thread/Underhead Friction Measurements

To insure overall reliable performance of threaded fasteners, it is necessary to control the frictional
characteristics in both the thread and underhead regions. Achieving a specific clamp force during
installation is always the desired result. However, the roll of thread and underhead friction must not be
overlooked in preventing loosening.

In the development of fastener locking devices such as locknuts, serrated underheads, special thread
forms, or thread locking compounds, it is essential that you have a means to measure both thread friction
and underhead friction.
8
A Torque-Tension Research Head, as shown in cross-section in Figure 11, is a special load cell
constructed to measure simultaneously thread torque, TG, and clamp load, FV. It is used along with the
measurement of the input torque, TA, to determine the underhead friction torque and the thread friction
torque.

Figure 11. Torque-Tension Research Head

In the test plot, illustrated in Figure 12, the

locknut is initially driven onto a bolt the
thread friction torque is equal to the input
torque until contact with the underhead-
bearing surface is made. Once contact is
made with the underhead area, the
underhead friction torque is measured as
the difference between the total input
torque and the thread torque.

Figure 12. Determining Frictional Forces

As clamp force is developed, the pitch torque is calculated

and subtracted from the thread torque to compute the
thread friction torque. Note that Pitch Torque = Pitch X
Clamp Force/2 X π.

1.11 Automated Tightening Process

The capability of a power tool to deliver torque and turn to
fasteners in a controlled fashion is the primary criteria for selection of tools for critical assembly
operations. Torque-angle curves can be used to establish the energy transfer and control required from
the tool. For the same maximum torque stiff-hard joints absorb less energy than soft highly compressible
joints. Likewise long flexible fasteners absorb more energy than short stiff fasteners when torqued to the
same values. Current industry practice involves use of air motors as well as energy efficient and highly
controllable dc electric nutrunners. The various monitoring strategies include:
ƒ Torque Monitoring
ƒ Torque Monitoring with Control
ƒ Torque-Angle Monitoring
ƒ Torque-Angle Monitoring with Control
ƒ Torque Rate Monitoring
ƒ Yield Control (Variation of Rate Monitoring)
All of these processes are dependent upon measurement of the dynamic torque or torque and angle
profiles during the tightening process.

2.0 Torque-Angle-Tension Control

The following paragraphs build on the concepts explained in the preceding section to further define
torque-angle-tension control as the most significant method for determining joint integrity.

2.1 Introduction
It is possible for certain fasteners to be tightened with lower tension scatter by controlling tool shutoff at a
specific angle of turn after a specified torque level is reached than would be attained if tightening had
been done only with torque control. For this process to work reliably, it is necessary that the threshold
torque that initiates the angle count to shutoff be set at a level above the alignment zone of the tightening
9
process. Figure 13 shows a clamp force scatter of 40 percent with torque control, reduced to 10 percent
with torque-angle control.

When torque-only control is used as the method for tightening a fastener, there is absolutely no way to be
100 percent certain that the desired tension will be created. Using installation torque alone to control the
process always introduces an element of “statistical gambling” into the assembly process. Installation
torque measurements that are not backed up with simultaneous angle-of-turn measurements cannot be
totally relied upon to insure that proper fastener installation has been accomplished.

For bolted joints where safety and reliable performance are dependent upon proper initial tension, both
torque and angle-of-turn must be monitored and controlled during the tightening process. As each
fastener is installed, the torque-angle tightening signature of the bolted joint should be compared to es-
tablished assembly process limits to insure that the specified assembly preload has been achieved.

The fundamental tightening procedure for Torque-Angle-Tension Control is simply defined as follows.
1. Torque is applied until a specified “threshold” level is attained.
2. An additional angle-of-turn is applied to finish the installation.
The engineering analysis, test measurements, and installation methods outlined in this section can be
applied to virtually any bolted joint. A unified approach, starting with basic assumptions, is used to
develop a reliable torque-angle control procedure for achieving specified clamp loads.

Figure 13. Torque Control vs. Torque-Angle Control

2.2 Torque-Angle Signature

The basic torque-angle signature is used as a
starting point for all analysis. The influence of
underhead and thread friction on the tightening
process is easily illustrated by this model curve.
An increase in friction, in either the thread or
underhead regions, results in a proportional
increase in the slope of the torque-angle
signature. The angle-tension coefficient for each
bolted joint must be determined in order to
establish the control parameters for torque-
angle-tension Control. The RFM slope from the
FM-Alpha (Clamping Force Angle) Diagram
corresponds to the tension-angle coefficient for
the tightening curve.

By shutting off the assembly tool at a specified

angle-of-turn after the threshold torque is
attained, the scatter in achieved tension will be
much less than the scatter observed for the
same fasteners tightened with torque-only
control. For this process to work reliably, it is
necessary that the threshold torque level for
starting angle counting be set at a level which is
above the alignment zone of the tightening
process.

The curves in Figure 14 illustrate the basic

principle of torque-turn-tension control. A key element in understanding how bolted joints function is the
concept of the elastic origin, discussed previously.

10
Figure 14. Torque-Turn-Tension Control Principles

The elastic origin is located by projection of

the tangent to the torque-anglesignature
curve to the zero torque or prevailing
torque level. In the elastic tightening of the
assembly process, bolt tension, or clamp
force, is directly proportional to the angle-
of-turn from the elastic origin.

A number of different methods can be used

to determining the angle-tension coefficient
for the bolted joint. A basic assumption is
that as the fastener is turned to develop
tension in the joint, the fastener stretches
and the clamped parts compress elastically
according to the effective spring rates of
the fastener and the clamped parts.

After the angle-tension coefficient is determined for elastic clamping, it is relatively easy to estimate the
1
tension achieved when tightening beyond the bolt yield point .

After the installation process has been defined and implemented, methods must be specified to audit the
results in order to verify that the process has achieved the desired fastener preload. Process audit
procedures including the “Release Angle” measurement method and hand torque breakaway audits are
presented in paragraph 3.0.

2.3 Torque-Angle Signature Analysis

Hand torque audits are conducted to verify the amount of torque that has been applied to a fastener.
However, it is actually the tension or clamp force that determines whether the fastener has been properly
tightened. Factors such as crossthreading can indicate a sufficiently high torque level while the clamp
force is well below requirements.

A method of tightness verification called torque-angle signature analysis now provides a very practical
and powerful technique for evaluating the actual clamp force achieved by a fastener installation process.
Examining the torque-angle signature of a fastener basically means looking at tightening and loosening
curves, or plots of torque versus angle, as the fastener is installed/uninstalled. These curves are studied
initially in the elastic-tightening region where the fastener has not gone beyond yield.

The same test measurements used to establish the torque-angle process parameters can also be used
as the basis for additional analysis. Torque-angle signatures can also be used to help verify joint strength,
safety factors, and fatigue strength. They provide an extremely practical means to verify bolted joint
design and engineering calculations. The M-alpha Diagram2, presented in detail in paragraph 2.9,
illustrates the effect of friction coefficients on the torque-angle signature. The effect of the thread friction
coefficient on the clamp force developed at the onset of bolt yield is also clearly illustrated by use of the
M-Alpha Diagram.

The following paragraphs discuss torque-angle signature analysis in more detail.

1
The yield point must be analyzed to determine if the yield detected is in the bolt, or the joint, or possibly is a result of thread strip,
or underhead embedment.

2
The M-alpha Diagram was created in 1996 by Fritz Ruoss of HEXAGON and Ralph Shoberg of RS Technologies as an extension
of the SR1-VDI 2230 Bolted Joint Design Software for Windows. See Appendix B for a Glossary of Terms for SR1-VDI 2230.

11
2.3.1 Tightening Curve
As described previously, the typical torque-angle tightening curve consists first of an aligning zone, which
is a nonlinear or curved portion, where the fastener aligns parts and draws them together. Next is the
elastic clamping zone, where the joint has been stabilized, the parts have been drawn together, and the
fastener is snugging up the joint. This portion of the curve is a straight line or constant slope as shown in
Figure 15.

Figure 15. Tightening Curve and Release Angle Audit Curve

The fastener has been sufficiently snugged up when

enough torque has been applied to the joint to get beyond
the aligning zone so that it is in the elastic clamping zone.

2.3.2 Elastic Origin

Once torquing has been stopped in the elastic clamping
zone, a line tangent to the straight-line portion of the curve
can be projected backwards. The point where the
projection line strikes zero torque, if there is no prevailing
torque, is called the elastic origin. If the angle of turn is
measured from the elastic origin to the point where
torquing was stopped in the elastic clamping zone, it will be found that the tension on the joint is directly
proportional to that angle of turn. What is happening is that compression of the parts and stretching of the
fastener is occurring in a linear fashion from the projected elastic origin. Even if friction on the threads or
the underhead region of the fastener is varied, it still will be found that within the elastic region the tension
generated is always proportional to the angle of turn from the elastic origin.

When studying a fastener where there is prevailing torque in the initial rundown, the line projected back
along the elastic curve must stop at the prevailing level and the elastic origin will be set there rather than
at zero torque. Then the tightening angle is from this elastic origin to the point where tightening was
stopped in the elastic region.

2.3.3 Loosening Curve

When a fastener is loosened, a torque-angle loosening curve can be plotted which is a reverse of the
tightening curve (refer back to Figure 15). This is also called a release angle audit or release angle
method of tightness verification. A line is projected tangent to the elastic release portion of the curve and
taken to zero torque, locating the elastic origin. The release angle, ascertained from the point where
loosening starts to the projected elastic origin, is a direct measure of the tension released from the joint.

Experiments with strain gage bolts or force washers where the clamp force is measured along with the
torque and angle during tightening will verify that this theory is correct for any given fastener. To apply
torque-angle signature analysis, a torque-angle transient recorder is used for curve measurement and
plotting. The transient recorder can provide curves on-screen for analysis as well as print them out for
detailed study. Tightening, audit and release angle signatures for a given fastener can be simultaneously
displayed and printed.

Figure 16 shows a release angle study performed on an automotive wheel nut. A tool with a torque and
angle sensor connected to the transient recorder is used to loosen the nut, record the torque and angle
values, and plot the data. The resulting printed curve shows a very high release torque. Applying the re-
lease angle method, a line is projected tangent to the elastic release portion of the curve to zero torque.
This release angle, measured from the release torque point to the point where the tangent line crosses, is
directly proportional to the tension or clamp force released.

12
Figure 16. Release Angle Study on Automotive Wheel Nut

2.3.4 Beyond Yield

When a fastener is taken beyond the yield point,
the torque angle signature method is used to find
the elastic origin, project a line along the elastic
curve above the yield point, then project the
maximum torque level back to that line. The
added tension after yield is the amount of angle
relative to the straight line elastic clamping
portion to that maximum torque point and is not
proportional to the overall angle of turn as shown
in Figure 17.

Figure 17. Determining Clamp Force Beyond Yield Point

When performing a release angle audit on a

fastener beyond yield, a similar projection of the
elastic curve is done.

2.3.5 Loosening Tendencies

The release angle method has been successfully
used to study fastener-loosening tendencies. In
this application the torque-angle-tightening curve is
first plotted, the elastic origin is located, and the
amount of angle of turn from the elastic origin is
determined. After the assembly has been allowed
to relax, i.e. sit overnight or run on a hot test, the
fastener is loosened and the loosening curve is
studied. The release angle is determined, it is
compared to the tightening angle, and if not equal, evaluated to see how much tension was lost either by
relaxation or loosening.

In one release angle study, a part had a tightening angle of 120 degrees. Once the part set overnight, the
release angle was 20 degrees. The vendor already knew there was a major problem because the parts
were falling apart. The study showed that there was relaxation in the threads that was causing ap-
proximately an 80 percent loss in clamp force over a 12-hour period. The release angle method provided
a quantitative answer as to how much clamp force was being lost and clearly showed that a redesign of
the parts was required.

The release angle method is also valuable for studying short grip length fasteners holding composite or
plastic parts. Here, a torque-angle signature curve for tightening is produced, then the parts might be put
in an environmental chamber and temperature cycled, followed by a release angle study. The release an-
gle curve indicates the amount of clamp load loss due to embedment of the fastener into the plastic part
under temperature. By changing joint geometry or by changing the size of washers, the effects can be
quantitatively measured and compared.

2.3.6 Accurate Measurement

Torque-angle signature analysis is especially useful for studying critical fastener assemblies—critical in
terms of safety or reliability—such as auto, truck, aerospace, and process industry applications, and the
like. In the hands of a skilled operator, these studies can be accurate within 5 percent or better.

13
In addition to analyzing fastener problems such as loosening and embedment, torque-angle signature
analysis can also be used to evaluate the performance of tightening tools in applying the desired clamp
force on fasteners. It is particularly applicable for evaluating pulse tools and impact tools.

Pulse and impact tools move fasteners at high speeds with a great deal of stick-slip, chatter, and unique
frictional characteristics that are not seen with steady, continuous tightening processes. These factors
can lead to a deceptively high torque reading but with minimal clamp force created. By checking the
assembled joint with a release angle study, the user can assure that an adequate angle of turn, and thus
proper clamp force, is being achieved. Clearly this method of audit provides a direct measure of the
capability of a given tool to develop tension in the tightened fastener. The results of release angle audits
being directly related to the tension achieved are significantly more meaningful than the information
gained from breakaway torque audits.

2.3.7 Torque-Angle Signature Analysis Summary

The torque-angle signature method of analysis is plain, simple, and straightforward. It is grounded in the
basic physics of tightening a bolted joint. It can be applied to fasteners of all sizes, all grip lengths. While
there may be 75-100 factors that affect the tightness of a given bolted joint, the torque-angle signature
analysis method provides for direct verification of clamp force to assure a quality fastener assembly.

2.4 Clamp Force / Strength Considerations

The clamp force and preload requirements for a bolted joint are determined by the static and dynamic
loads that the assembly is expected to see in service. The bolted joint design must be completely
engineered with regard to the axial (concentric), eccentric, and side shear loads to which the assembly
will be subjected. This is the first step in any fastener-engineering project.

After the external working loads have been defined, the necessary bolt preload can be calculated. Next,
the safety factors against embedment and thread strip must be checked to insure that yielding in the
bearing areas or threads will not limit the preload to less than the required amount.

The safety factors for embedment and thread-strip are important both for the initial installation of the
fastener and for long term reliability with regard to both loosening and fatigue resistance. The illustration
in Figure 18 shows some of the strength factors that should all be evaluated with regard to expected ser-
vice loads and preload requirements.

Figure 18. Basic Geometric and Material Strength Factors

2.5 Modeling the Tightening Process

The process of tightening a fastener involves
turning (advance of the lead screw) and torque
(turning moment) so that preload (tension) is
produced in the fastener. As discussed previously,
the desired result is a clamping force to hold the
components together. The most general model of
the fastener tightening process has four distinct
zones as illustrated in Figure 19.

14
Figure 19. Four Zones of the Tightening Process

Zone 1 is the rundown or prevailing torque

zone that occurs before the fastener or nut
contacts the bearing surface. Prevailing
torque due to thread locking features such
as nylon inserts or deformed threads will
show up in the rundown zone. Frictional
drag on the shank or threads due to
misalignment of parts, chips or foreign
material in the threads as well as
unintended interference due to out of
tolerance threads are additional causes of
prevailing torque in the rundown zone.

Zone 2 is the alignment or snugging zone,

wherein the fastener and joint mating
surfaces are drawn into alignment, or a
stable, clamped condition. The nonlinear alignment zone is a complex function of the process of drawing
together the mating parts, and bending of the fastener as a result of non-parallelism of the bearing
surface to the fastener underhead surface. In addition to the macro effects related to alignment of parts,
there are micro effects within the alignment zone. The micro effects include contact stress-induced
deformations of plating and coatings as well as local surface roughness and thread deformations.

Zone 3 is the elastic clamping zone, wherein the slope of the torque-angle signature curve is constant.
The elastic clamping zone torque-angle slope is a very important characteristic of each bolted joint. This
slope can be projected backward to locate the elastic origin. Angle-of-turn from the elastic origin is multi-
plied by the angle-tension coefficient to calculate the tension that has been created by the tightening
process.

The elastic origin is located at the intersection of the prevailing torque level and the backward projection
3
of the elastic clamping zone . To further illustrate the concept of the elastic origin, the torque-angle
signatures in Figure 20 show the increased slope, induced by increased friction, in the elastic-tightening
zone.

Figure 20. Friction Effects on Yield Point

Note that as friction increases, the torque

required to bring the bolt to yield is also
increased. The curves in Figure 21 show that,
as friction increases, the clamp force at the
yield point is reduced, while the torque required
to reach the yield point increases. This
illustrates the fact that for a given fastener size,
the torque required to yield the bolt is a function
of the material yield strength and the thread
friction coefficient.

3
A line drawn tangent to any point on the torque -angle curve, prior to the yield point, can be used to directly estimate the relative
spring rate of the clamped assembly at that point.

15
Figure 21. Friction Effects on Applied Torque and Clamping Force

Once the torquing effort has been

stopped in the elastic clamping zone,
a line tangent to the straight-line
portion of the curve can be projected
backwards. The point where the
projection line strikes zero torque,
provided there is no prevailing torque,
is called the elastic origin. If the
angle-of-turn is measured from the
elastic origin to the point where
torquing was stopped in the elastic
clamping zone, it has been found that
the tension in the fastener is directly
proportional to that angle-of-turn.

What is happening is that the

compression of the parts and the
stretching of the fastener is occurring
in a linear fashion from the projected elastic origin. Even if friction between threads or in the underhead
region of the fastener is varied, it still will be found that within the elastic region, the tension generated is
always proportional to the angle-of-turn from the elastic origin.

When studying a fastener where there is prevailing torque in the initial rundown, the line projected back
along the elastic curve must stop at the prevailing level and the elastic origin will be set there rather than
at zero torque. Then the tightening angle is from this elastic origin to the point where tightening was
stopped in the elastic region.

Zone 4, as shown in Figure 19, is the post-yield zone, which begins with an inflection point at the end of
the elastic clamping range. Yielding can occur in the bolt or in the joint assembly, as a result of
underhead embedment or as thread strip in the bolt or mating threads. The yield point can be used to
establish or verify the tension -angle coefficient for the torque-angle-tension tightening process.

2.6 Torque-Tension Coefficient: Nut Factor, K

The basic equation, T= K D F, can be applied to the linear elastic clamping zone of the assembly
tightening process. The prevailing torque during initial rundown must be subtracted from the total applied
torque, a procedure that is usually accurate for all practical purposes. If insufficient torque is applied to
tighten beyond the alignment zone, the tension estimated for a given assembly will be still be correctly
predicted if the overall K factor has been accurately estimated.

There are published tables of K factors for various combinations of materials, surface finishes, plating,
coatings and lubricants. However, actual experience has shown that it is highly unreliable to assume that
any given K value applies to a specific fastener being assembled. The importance of the torque-angle ap-
proach to assembly cannot be overemphasized when you are responsible for the safety and reliability of
critical bolted assemblies. It is not uncommon to see variations in friction coefficients of 2:1 or more as the
same fastener is repeatedly tightened and loosened. The most practical way to minimize the variation in
clamp force for bolted assemblies is to use both torque and angle-of-turn in your assembly process.

The K factor, often referred to as the “nut factor,” can be expressed as a combination of three factors:
ƒ K1 (a geometric factor, function of diameter, d and Pitch, P)
ƒ K2 (a thread friction factor, function of µG and pitch diameter, d2)
ƒ K3 (a bearing friction factor, function of µK and Dkm)
The curve shown in Figure 22 illustrates the value of the nut factor K, as a function of the average friction
coefficient. The underhead friction coefficient, µK, and the thread friction coefficient, µG, are assumed to
be equal to µges for this example.
16
Figure 22. Nut Factor, K, as Function of Friction

2.7 Experimental Determination of Friction

Coefficients
Tabulated values of K are not reliable for applications
with any assurance of predictable results for a given bolt
or nut assembly. It is equally true that friction coefficients
determined experimentally must be used for comparison
purposes and supplemented by torque-angle assembly
monitoring to assure proper assembly clamp forces.

The German norm, DIN 9464, provides a practical

standard method for evaluation of friction coefficients on
screw threads and underhead bearing surfaces.
Fastener laboratory testing machines are available for
determination of friction coefficients according to DIN
946.

A Fastener Laboratory Test Machine for testing fasteners up to M36 size is shown in the photograph,
Figure 22. The largest existing machines of this type are capable of testing fasteners up to M100 with
clamp load capacities up to 500 KN and torque capacities of 35 KNm. Small table top units are available
for testing fasteners in the sizes below M1 (English fasteners down to 0-80).

Figure 23. Laboratory Fastener Test Machine, Typical

2.8 Thread / Underhead

Friction Coefficient
Measurements
In the development of threaded
fastener materials, surface
finishes, plating, coatings, and
thread locking adhesives, it is
necessary to measure and
control the friction coefficients
on both the threads and
underhead regions of the fas-
teners.

A Torque-Tension Research
Head, as illustrated in Figure
24, is a special load cell
constructed to simultaneously
measure both thread torque
(pitch torque plus thread
friction torque) in addition to
the tension created as the
tightening torque is applied.
Special devices such as
locknuts, serrated underheads,
and thread locking adhesives
and friction patches can be tested and friction performance standards can be established and maintained
through measurements made with the Torque-Tension Research Heads. The Research Head has the
capability to fully test for friction coefficients according to DIN 946.

4
DIN 946, Determination of coefficient of friction of bolt/nut assemblies under specified conditions (October 1991)

17
Figure 24. Torque-Tension Research Head

The average coefficient of friction, µges, can be

roughly estimated by measuring the change in
length of a screw or bolt after application of a
given tightening torque. This method can only be
applied if there is no yield occurring in the bolt,
threads or elsewhere in the joint.

2.9 M-Alpha Diagram

The M-Alpha (torque angle) Diagram, Figure 25,
is the straight-line projection of the tangent to the
torque-angle assembly curve as projected
backwards from the final elastic tightening point
to zero torque, or the prevailing torque level.
This tangent projection is used to locate the
elastic origin. Within the elastic tightening zone
of the assembly process the clamp force
developed is directly proportional to the angle-of-turn from the elastic origin.

Figure 25. M-Alpha Diagram

Since the M-Alpha Diagram was first developed as an extension of the SR1, VDI 2230 Bolted Joint
Design Software, we have chosen to retain the terminology of the VDI standard glossary of terms (i.e., M
for torque, from the German Drehmoment). These terms are defined in Section 8.0. Thus, we have
18
torque-angle measurements from testing corresponding to the M-Alpha Diagram calculated as part of the
SR1 VDI 2230 design software.

In addition to the applied torque MA, the M-Alpha Diagram has projections from the elastic origin for both
the thread torque MG, and the pitch torque MARP (where µ=0). A very useful feature of the M-Alpha
Diagram is the easy manner in which the diagram clearly illustrates the distribution of the torque in a
tightening process. With MA showing the total input torque, MG represents the thread torque that is the
thread friction plus the pitch torque that creates the clamp-force. The difference between the MA and MG
curves represents the underhead friction torque. The difference between the pitch torque curve and the
MG curve represents the thread friction torque.

The SR1 M-Alpha Diagram is a straight line projected from the elastic origin to the yield point. By
changing the thread friction (µG) and underhead friction (µK) coefficients assumed for the VDI 2230
analysis, the effect of friction on the tightening process can be clearly seen on the M-Alpha Diagram.

2.10 FM-Alpha Diagdram

The FM-Alpha (clamp force-angle) diagram, Figure 26, is a new feature that was added to the SR1-VDI
2230 design software. This diagram illustrates the clamp force vs. angle-of-turn from the elastic origin.
The slope of this curve in Newtons/degree establishes the angle-tension coefficient for a specific bolted
joint design.

Figure 26. FM-Alpha Diagram

The upper limit of the elastic clamping range is the yield point, which is calculated based upon the
specified thread friction coefficient (µG) and the material tensile yield strength, i.e., M10.9, 940 Mpa. The
maximum shear strength Mohr Circle calculation is used to determine the combined tension-torsional
yield load.

19
2.11 Estimating the Tension-Angle Coefficient
The angle-tension coefficient can be estimated by several methods, each of which can be used to confirm
the estimate made by one of the others. Basic guidelines for these methods are given in the following
sections. Ultrasonic Stretch (para 2.11.1)
ƒ Strain Gaged Bolt (para 2.11.2)
ƒ Force Washer (para 2.11.3)
ƒ Model-Calculation (para 2.11.4)
ƒ Material Property - Yield (para 2.11.5)
2.11.1 Ultrasonic Stretch
The Ultrasonic Stretch method starts with ultrasonic stretch or tension calibration of the test bolt. After the
bolt is calibrated, it is installed in the assembly and the torque-angle signature is recorded. The ultrasonic
measurement is then made to determine the stretch or tension developed by the installation torque.
Provided that the fastener was not stressed beyond the yield point, and that no yield was induced in the
threads or underhead, the tension reading can be used to calculate the tension-angle coefficient.

The elastic origin is located on the torque-angle signature curve recorded when the fastener was
tightened. The clamp force measured by the ultrasonic stretch measurement is divided by the angle of
turn from the elastic origin to determine the slope of the FM-Alpha curve. Once this information is
available, it is possible to confirm the original bolted joint design with detailed FEA calculations, or
through use of the SR1 design software.

2.11.2 Strain-Gaged Bolt

The Strain-Gaged Bolt method of determination of the tension-angle coefficient starts with calibration of
the bolt prior to installation in the assembly. The calibrated bolt is tightened in the assembly and the
torque-angle signature is recorded. Provided that only elastic tightening has occurred, i.e., no yield is
detected, the tension reading from the test bolt can be used to determine the tension-angle coefficient.

The torque-angle signature is evaluated to locate the elastic origin. The elastic-tightening angle from the
elastic origin to the final tightening torque is divided into the measure clamp load to determine the
tension-angle coefficient.

If a two channel transient recorder, such as the RS Technologies Model 960 shown in Figure 27, is used
to record the torque-angle signature you should be able to directly plot torque-tension, torque-angle and
force-angle curves. M-Alpha and FM-Alpha curves are standard plots generated by the Model 960 based
on the recorded torque-angle signatures.

Figure 27. Two-Channel Transient Recorder

The use of a strain gaged bolt will result in a modification of the

bolt stiffness unless the bolt is dimensionally the same as the
ungaged bolt. Calculation of the tension-angle coefficient should
take into account any estimated change in stiffness for the bolt
from the fasteners to be assembled in the normal assembly
process.

The friction coefficients for the thread and underhead regions of

the fastener will most likely not duplicate the conditions on the
normal production parts. This should be recognized as not a
major problem as long as we are focusing on obtaining the
tension-angle coefficient. If we were trying to obtain a “torque-
tension” coefficient the futility of the effort should be obvious to
anyone familiar with how fastener friction affects torque-tension.

20
2.11.3 Force Washer

The use of a calibrated Force Washer to determine the tension-angle coefficient for a bolted joint requires
some extra calculation to estimate the effect of the increased bolt length and the spring rate of the force
washer in parallel with the clamped parts.

The increase in angle of turn due to the longer bolt and softer joint when using a force washer means that
the actual tension-angle coefficient will be larger than when tightening the assemblies with no force
washer present in the joint.

The torque-angle signature as well as the torque-tension curves can be recorded. The tension vs. angle
curves and FM-Alpha curves can be directly plotted from the transient recorder. Using the SR1 design
software the increased length of the bolt and the stiffness of the force washer can be introduced into the
design calculation model.

By adjusting the shape and stiffness of the clamped elements in the SR1 design software, the slope of
the calculated FM-Alpha plot can be matched to the actual measured curve as plotted by the transient
recorder. Since clamp load is proportional to angle of turn from the elastic origin, calculations for the FM-
Alpha Diagram are independent of the friction coefficients up to the bolt yield point.

Once we have refined the joint model with the force washer in-place so that the model matches the
measured FM-Alpha curve, we can shorten the bolt and remove the force washer element from the
model. The final model will now allow us to directly calculate the tension-angle coefficient. The resulting
M-Alpha Diagram will now show the effect of friction coefficient variations on the slope of the elastic-
tightening region of the torque-angle signature. The effect of thread friction on the yield load can also be
demonstrated.

Of course, once the bolted joint is fully modeled by combination of experimental and theoretical
calculations the SR1 design software automatically calculates all of the safety factors according to the
VDI 2230 guide.

2.11.4 Model-Calculation: Estimate of Angle-Tension Coefficient

The Model-Calculation method in its simplest form involves selecting a value for the nut factor, K, which is
used to calculate an initial estimate of the clamp force expected for a given torque. While it is acceptable
to simply pick a value for K to be used in preliminary calculations, a more precise model can be
developed if coefficients are estimated for thread and underhead friction, and K is calculated based upon
these assumptions. The formula for calculation of K is illustrated as follows.

K = K1 + K2 + K3
Where:
K1 = the geometric function of diameter d and thread pitch P
K2 = the thread friction factor, a function of the thread friction coefficient µG, and the pitch diameter d2
K3 = a bearing friction factor, a function of the underhead friction coefficient µK, and the mean bearing or
underhead diameter Dkm).
Using an effective length of the bolt equal to the grip length plus one diameter, the bolt stretch due to the
estimated clamp force is calculated. For a given thread pitch, the angle-of-turn required to provide the
desired stretch is calculated.

The torque-angle signature is obtained while tightening to the specified torque. After locating the elastic
origin on the signature plot, it is possible to determine the total tightening angle, which includes bolt
stretch and compression of the clamped parts.

21
The angle-tension coefficient is estimated as the clamp force derived from the basic T = K D F formula
using the assumed value of K, with the angle of turn from the elastic origin obtained from the test
signature curve.

From this information it is possible to make a preliminary estimate of the relative stiffness of the clamped
parts compared to the bolt. The stretch of the bolt is translated to terms of angular rotation based upon
the simple relationship between the stretch due to the estimated load and the pitch, P of the thread.

Using FEA5 it is also possible to model the bolt and joint spring rates so that an estimate of the angle-
tension coefficient can be made. Since this method involves estimating a proper K value one or more of
the other methods must always back it up. A combination of torque signature analysis with the SR1 de-
sign software is perhaps the most efficient way to calculate the joint and bolt spring rates necessary for a
complete bolted joint analysis.

2.11.5 Laboratory Measurement of Friction Coefficients

A Torque-Tension Research Head, as shown in Figure 28, is used to make the measurements necessary
to determine the friction coefficients for the under-head and thread regions.

Figure 28. Torque-Tension Research Head

The equations for this analysis are directly

derived from the force-torque free-body
diagrams for the 60-degree Sellers thread
form. Mechanical engineering design
textbooks, such as those by Robert C.
Juvinall and Joseph Shigley, provide a
detailed derivation of the torque-tension
relationships for threaded fasteners. The
equations presented in the German
Standard DIN 946 can be verified following
the derivations presented by Juvinall and
Shigley. Using the terminology of DIN 946,
which also corresponds directly with the
terminology of VDI 2230, it is possible to
calculate the nut factor, K, based upon the
friction coefficients, bolt pitch diameter and
thread pitch. The formula for calculation of
the nut factor, K, is based on the simplified
torque-tension equation T = K d F as
follows:

Where:
P = the thread pitch
d2 = the pitch diameter
µG = the thread friction coefficient
DKm = the mean bearing diameter or underhead
µK = the underhead friction coefficient d = the nominal diameter of the bolt

5
FEA, Finite element analysis modeling methods.

22
With properly designed test fixtures, the Research Head6 is used to test a variety of fastener
configurations, i.e., 1) tightening the bolt, 2) tightening the nut, 3) tightening self tapping screws, and 4)
tightening pipe thread fittings. For example, when conducting tests according to ANJ-514 for high
pressure pipe fittings, the use of special tooling permitted a 1/4-inch grip length to produce significant
information that was used to compare Cadmium plating with various Zinc formulations.

2.11.6 Material Property –Yield

When a fastener is taken beyond the yield point, the torque angle signature method is first used to find
the elastic origin. Then the yield point is located at the upper end of the elastic tightening curve where the
linear portion of the signature rolls over into the post yield tightening zone.

The added tension after yield is the amount of angle relative to the straight line elastic clamping portion to
that maximum torque point and is not proportional to the overall angle-of-turn (refer to Figure 29). First,
project a line along the elastic curve above the yield point. Then project the maximum torque level back to
that line.

Figure 29. Determining Clamp Force beyond the Yield Point

This procedure only works properly if the

observed yield point is due to the bolt
yielding. Joints where thread strip or
underhead embedment occurs before
bolt yield cannot be evaluated by this
method.

It is generally true that once threads strip

or embedment starts, the clamping load
no longer increases at the same rate
relative to angular turn. In most cases,
particularly in response to thread
stripping, the clamp load does not
increase at all although the torque may
increase 25-35 percent after the onset of
yielding. Failure to properly recognize
this phenomenon has been the downfall
of a number of attempts to utilize “yield
sensing“ tightening strategies.

The clamp load at the bolt yield torque is primarily a function of the material properties of the bolt, and the
thread friction coefficient, µG.

Underhead embedment resulting from compressive yield in the bearing area depends upon the strength
of the bolt or nut relative to the clamped surface strength.

Thread yield, or thread strip, is a function of the length of thread engagement and the relative strengths of
the bolt and mating thread materials.

Refer to Figure 30 for an illustration of the characteristic “yield signature” curves for both bolt yield and
thread strip/embedment. Note that for bolt yield the maximum increase in torque after the yield point is
only 10-20 percent due to the typical ratio between yield and tensile strengths for commonly used bolt
materials, i.e., for a metric class 10.9 bolt the difference is 10 percent.

6
RS Technologies Torque-Tension Research Head with capacities or 1000 KN (225,000 lb.) and 4000 Nm (3,000 lb-ft)

23
Figure 30. Yield Signature Curves

Also illustrated is the torque-angle signature

beyond the yield point for a tightening process
where thread strip or underhead embedment
has occurred. Torque increases of 25-35
percent or more after the underhead yield or
thread strip point are often observed. The
difference between the two types of yield
phenomena is usually very clear. However, this
again can be used as a reminder to try to
calculate the relative safety factors for bolt
yield, thread strip and underhead embedment.

When a bolt is torqued to the yield point the

yield clamp load is always less than the simple
tension-test yield load. This is due to the
combined tensile and torsional stresses on the
shank of the bolt resulting from the torquing
process.

Figure 21, presented previously, illustrates the effect of thread friction on the torque and clamp force at
the yield point.

With the torque-angle signature it is possible to measure the elastic-tightening angle from the elastic
origin to the yield point. If a nominal friction coefficient of 0.1 is assumed for the thread and underhead
then the clamp load at the bolt yield torque will be about 80 percent of the tensile-test yield load.

The tension-to-angle coefficient is then calculated as the yield clamp load divided by the angle of turn
from the elastic origin to the yield point. The tension-to-angle coefficient is the slope of the FM-Alpha
Diagram created by the SR1 design software.

If thread strip or underhead embedment occurs before bolt yield it is necessary to estimate the load at this
yield point and divide the load by the elastic tightening angle to the tension-angle coefficient.

It is sometimes possible or necessary to cold work a bearing surface by repeated tightening beyond the
yield point so that adequate clamp force can be achieved on the bolt. However, it is poor practice to
design bolted joints where thread strip or embedment occur before the bolt yields.

2.12 Torque-Angle Tension Control Summary

The proper application of any assembly process includes the requirement that limitations and safety
factors associated with the specified procedures be understood and well documented. This philosophy is
in accordance with the principles defined by ISO 9000 and QS-9000 documentation requirements that
have become the guiding quality operating system methods for manufacturing worldwide.

A relatively simple two-step process of torque-angle tightening was defined at the beginning of this
section with a few short sentences. It should now be clear to the reader who has taken the time to go into
the details which followed the introduction that this “simple” assembly procedure is potentially far more
complicated than it initially appears to be.

The benefits gained through understanding how fasteners really work can be enormous. In terms of cost
both material and in human life and suffering, the results of poor bolted joint design and failed assembly
procedures have been reported at many millions of dollars per year.

For a total engineering approach to assembly an understanding of the principles of mechanics and
material science underlying the performance of threaded fasteners is essential. The effects of thread

24
friction, underhead friction, bearing areas, material strengths, thread strength, joint strength, must all be
accounted for when a tightening process is specified.

In the final analysis, only actual experience from the field will tell if the design of an assembly is
successful. However, with a proper understanding of the assembly process through torque-angle
signature analysis, significant insight into the assembly process and potential reliability of any bolted joint
can be developed.

3.0 Torque – Tension Audits

The following paragraphs discuss the principles of conducting torque tension audits.

3.1 Introduction
The art of auditing torque on tightened fasteners has changed significantly during the past three decades.
Prior to 1968, the primary method used to audit fasteners attempted to observe the “breakaway torque”
as a previously tightened fastener was advanced in the tightening direction. Typically, the torque reading
was obtained with a bending beam or dial indicator-type torque wrench. While this technique is still used
today for non-critical applications, the readings obtained are known to have little or no correlation with the
actual tension developed by the installation torque.

Other than the fact that, in general, higher values of breakaway torque indicate that higher installation
torque may have been applied, the breakaway torque measurement can not be relied upon to verify
fastener tension.

Following the introduction of the first rotary socket wrench torque transducers and the first battery
powered portable peak meters in 1968, there has been continuous development of fastener torque
measurement technology. The comparison of dynamic-applied torque to hand torque audits was only
possible after the first rotary socket wrench torque sensors were introduced with suitable peak torque
reading instruments.7 The techniques for measurement and interpretation of torque signatures have
become highly refined and capabilities have been developed to interpret both tool torque control as well
as make other more meaningful measurements which can be correlated with actual fastener tension. \

If the friction coefficients and other variables associated with a given bolted joint are uniform and
repeatable it is possible to demonstrate that fastener assemblies tightened to a specified torque will
achieve clamp loads with sufficiently low scatter for reliable performance of the assembly. Tightening to a
specified torque is still the most widely used assembly process.

Torque-turn tightening strategies add a significant degree of precision to the capability to achieve a
specified initial pre-load. They are clearly needed for applications where personal injury or loss of life or
other costly consequences is likely if loosening or fatigue failure should occur.

Use of torque as the sole means of achieving fastener initial preload always indicates that the person
responsible for the specification has accepted the scatter in preload results which naturally will occur. It
should also be recognized that torque tightening strategies are based upon statistical variations of a know
degree of scatter, and there is no provision to allow for problems introduced when parts with
characteristics outside of the normal population show up on the assembly line.

Torque only tightening strategies assume that the materials have known torque-tension characteristics
with a sufficiently small six-sigma scatter so that desired pre-load will be achieved if the proper, specified
torque is applied. Hand torque audits are used to verify the installation torque. Torque-angle signature
analysis methods can now be used to audit the installation torque, and with some additional study can be
used to audit actual tension on tightened fasteners.

7
Historical Note: The first commercially available socket wrench torque transducers and battery-powered peak meters were
designed and developed by Macit Gurol and Ralph Shoberg, co-founders of GSE, Inc.

25
Dynamic torque measurements and tool certification audits following guidelines such as ISO-5393 are
used to verify the capability of tools to consistently apply the specified torque over a broad range of joint
friction and spring rate conditions.

Fastener engineers and mechanical designers have much to learn from the art of "torque-turn signature
analysis". Experienced practitioners of the art of fastener signature analysis are capable of stripping away
much of the mystery and uncertainty which often is associated with the strength and reliability of threaded
fasteners and bolted joints.

3.2 Hand Torque Audit-Tool Torque Capability

Hand torque audits are used to verify the amount of torque that has been applied to a fastener. Torque
audits are not capable of predicting fastener tension accurately. Measurement of applied torque alone
does not provide sufficient information to permit estimation of clamp load achieved.

It is a fundamental rule of analysis that if more than one variable can significantly affect a result then more
than one measurement must be made to independently verify the desired result.

3.3 Tool Torque Capability / ISO 5393

The primary focus of ISO 5393 is to provide a standard method for evaluation of the capability of
assembly tools to tighten fasteners to a specified torque. The performance of a tool is first checked on
"soft" joints where the angle of turn from 10 percent of the maximum torque to maximum torque is greater
than 360 degrees. Next the ability of the tool to deliver controlled torque on "hard" joints where the
tightening angle is 30 degrees is compared to the soft joint values to establish a tool torque control
capability index.

A complete laboratory for testing of tool torque capability has been established by Ford Motor Company
at Lawrence Technological University in Southfield, Michigan.

3.4 Release Angle-Tension Audit

The tension or clamp force developed and not applied torque determines whether the fastener has been
properly tightened. Since variations in friction coefficients can produce as much as 3:1 or greater variation
in clamp force it is necessary that some method other than monitoring applied torque be used to confirm
the performance of tools in achieving fastener "tightness."

This is particularly important in the special case of pulse or impact tools where the fastener is tightened
with a series of torque impulses. The short duration pulses transfer energy into the bolted joint in a
discontinuous process which can be greatly influenced by both the joint spring rate and the frictional
characteristics of the fastener thread and underhead bearing surface.

Since it is possible to demonstrate "breakaway torque" correlation between "dynamic torque" applied by
hand or electric/pneumatic tools with a continuous energy transfer process many individuals have
attempted to use the same process to audit fasteners tightened with pulse and impact tools. Due to the
physics of the energy transfer process and the variable frictional characteristics and joint energy input
requirements which tools must respond to (i.e., ISO 5393) it should be clear that such efforts are doomed
to failure.

Those who have tried to accomplish this task have experienced great frustration. Not understanding the
nature of the problem, joint specific "fixes" have been tried. Reducing the frequency response (filtering) of
the dynamic measuring instruments to force the dynamic readings to be closer to the static breakaway
readings is the only way to obtain such correlation. For a given pulse or impact tool the method
immediately fails as soon as the tool is applied to a fastener where the joint rate vs. friction characteristics
vary from the initial setup conditions.

If the peak torque pulses are read with very high frequency response instruments the peak torque
readings can be used to verify the setup of the pulse tool. For such tests to be meaningful the joint spring
26
rate and friction coefficients must be controlled or standardized. At the present time no standard, ISO or
otherwise, exists as a guide to define the test joints for qualification of pulse or impact type tools. Thus the
individual user must develop his own standards to meet his specific tool testing requirements.

In the final analysis, the actual tension and preload developed by the tightening process is the result that
must be verified.

Examining the torque-angle signature of a fastener basically means looking at tightening and loosening
curves or plots of torque versus angle as the fastener is first installed and then loosened. These curves
are studied initially in the elastic-tightening region where the fastener has not gone beyond yield, as
shown in Figure 31.

Figure 31. Torque-Angle Signature with Embedment

When a fastener is loosened, a torque-angle-
loosening signature, as shown in Figure 32, can
be recorded. The release signature shows the
"release" of the fastener stretch and also the
release of the compression in the clamped parts.
Figure 32. Loosening Torque-Angle Signature

Analysis of this signature provides a direct method for

verification of preload or tightness. A line tangent to the
elastic release portion of the curve projected to zero
torque locates the elastic origin. The release angle,
measured from the point where loosening starts to the
projected elastic origin, is a direct measure of the tension released from the bolted joint.

The tangent line must be drawn on the straight-line portion of the curve after the initial peak release
torque due to static friction or thread-locking adhesive has been broken free. The starting point is the
angle where initial loosening motion begins. The total release angle is measured from the initial loosening
point to the projected elastic origin. (Note: If a significant prevailing torque is present after loosening the
fastener, the elastic origin must be located at the prevailing level, not zero torque.)

The torque-angle signature shown in Figure 1 has been plotted as an M-Alpha Diagram (i.e., torque-
angle) with the tangent line, locating the elastic origin, drawn at 50 percent of the maximum torque to set
the elastic tightening slope below the onset of embedment of the nut. The bolt is a M30 x 3.5 with a
strength Class 11.9.

The clamp force signature, plotted on the F-Alpha (i.e., preload-angle) Diagram confirms that the clamp
force increases linearly with the angle of turn from the projected elastic origin. In the example shown in
Figure 33, the elastic-tightening angle is approximately 125 degrees.

27
Figure 33. Clamp Force vs. Angle of Turn from Elastic Origin

The loosening torque-angle signature (refer to

Figure 32) has a projected re-lease angle of
approximately 125 degrees. The F-Alpha
Diagram (refer to Figure 33) confirms the fact
that even after embedment occurs the clamp
force increases directly in proportion to the
angle of turn from the elastic origin.

Experiments with strain gage bolts or force

washers, where the clamp force is measured
along with the torque and angle during
tightening, will verify that this theory is correct
for any given fastener.

To apply torque-angle signature analysis, a torque-angle transient recorder is used for curve
measurement and plotting. The transient recorder can provide curves on-screen for analysis as well as
print them out for detailed study. Tightening, audit and release angle signatures for a given fastener can
be simultaneously displayed and printed.

Figure 34 shows a release angle study performed on an automotive wheel nut. A tool with a torque and
angle sensor connected to the transient recorder is used to loosen the nut, record the torque and angle
values, and plot the data. The resulting printed curve shows an extremely high release torque. The high
initial breakaway loosening peak torque region is disregarded, as this is simply an indication of the static
8
torque required to start loosening motion.

Figure 34. Wheel Nut Loosening Signature

The elastic release angle for the wheel nut shown

above is approximately 40 degrees. The nut had
been tightened to a peak torque of 206 Nm (152 lb-
ft), which is 75 Nm (55 lb-ft) greater than the
vehicle manufacturer specification. The wheel nut
was originally tightened to a torque of 160 Nm (118
lb-ft), which did not appear to get past the
tightening alignment zone as shown by the
signature shown in Figure 35.

Figure 35. Wheel Nut Installation Signature

The installation was followed by a hand torque

breakaway audit where the nut was advanced
about 7-8 degrees in the tightening direction as
shown in Figure 36. The M-Alpha Diagram for the
audit shows that the final torque was about 206
Nm (152 lb-ft), with a projected elastic-tightening
angle of 40 degrees.

8
The high value of release torque is significant from the point of view that it illustrates the high thread friction due to thread pitch
distortion on the wheel nut, a factor that helps prevent vibratory loosening on typical wheel nuts.
28
Figure 36. Wheel Nut Torque Audit Signature

Applying the release angle method, a line

is projected tangent to the elastic release
portion of the curve to zero torque. This
release angle, measured from the release
torque point to the point where the
tangent line crosses the zero torque or
prevailing torque level, is directly
proportional to the tension or clamp force
released. Comparing Figure 6 with Figure
4 a significant correlation is seen to exist
between the release angle determined by
loosening the fastener and the M-Alpha
Diagram as applied to the Torque-angle
signature for the breakaway audit. The
loosening signature in Figure 34 was re-
corded after the audit plotted in Figure 36.

3.5 Loosening - Embedment or Loss of Preload

The release angle method has been successfully used to study fastener-loosening problems. The basic
procedure involves recording and analysis of the torque-angle signatures for tightening and then
loosening the fasteners that are to be tested.

First the torque-angle-tightening curve is plotted, the elastic origin is located, and the amount of angle of
turn from the elastic origin is determined. After the assembly has been allowed to relax, for example, to sit
overnight or run on a dynamic field test, the fastener is loosened and the loosening curve is analyzed.
The release angle is determined, compared to the tightening angle, and if not equal, evaluated to see
how much tension was lost by relaxation or loosening.

In one release angle study, a fastener had a tightening angle of 120 degrees. Once the part sat overnight,
the release angle was 20 degrees. The manufacturer was already aware there was a major problem
because the parts were literally falling apart somewhere between the assembly factory and the auto plant
where they were delivered for final assembly in vehicles. The signature analysis study showed that creep
or relaxation in the threads was causing an approximately 80 percent loss in clamp force over a 12-hour
period. The release angle method provided a quantitative answer as to the amount of clamp force lost,
and clearly showed that the parts needed to be redesigned.

The release angle method is particularly valuable for studying short grip length fasteners holding
composite or plastic parts. These parts are generally too small to allow for use of strain gages or
ultrasonic stretch measurements to confirm fastener preload.

For these applications, a torque-angle signature curve for tightening is recorded, then the parts are put in
an environmental chamber and load/ temperature cycled.

Following the test load cycle the release angle signature is recorded. Analysis of the release-angle
signature in comparison to the tightening signature is used to directly estimate the percentage of initial of
clamp load lost due to embedment or creep of the plastic part in response to applied loads or temperature
cycles. By changing geometric shapes and washer size, the effects can be quantitatively measured and
compared.

3.6 Measurements Verify Fastener Torque and Tension

Torque-angle signature analysis is particularly useful for studying all critical fastener assemblies where it
is important in terms of safety or reliability that proper preload is initially obtained and maintained
throughout the operating life of an assembly.

29
Threaded fasteners are an important element in the product assembly process for many industries such
as automobile, truck, aircraft, aerospace, machine tool, and construction. In the hands of a skilled
operator, signature analysis methods can accurately estimate preload or tension within 5 percent or
better.

In addition to analyzing fastener problems such as loosening and embedment, torque-angle signature
analysis can also be used to evaluate the performance of tightening tools in applying the desired clamp
force on fasteners. This technique is particularly applicable for evaluating pulse tools and impact tools.

Due primarily to ergonomic considerations pulse tools have recently been extensively evaluated for use in
high volume assembly operations. Unfortunately, the limitations of these tools related to their energy
transfer characteristics are not generally well understood. The tightening results in terms of torque-
tension or achieved preload are very much dependent upon the joint friction and spring rates.

Pulse and impact tools are particularly sensitive to joint rate and friction variations. Since friction
coefficients are a function of velocity as well as surface pressure tightening results with pulse and high
RPM tools must be carefully evaluated to ensure suitable tightening process capability.

Pulse and impact tools move fasteners at high speeds with a great deal of stick-slip, chatter, and unique
frictional characteristics that are not seen with steady, continuous tightening processes. These factors
can lead to a deceptively high torque reading but with minimal clamp force created. By checking the
assembled joint with a release angle study, the user can ensure that an adequate angle of turn, and thus
proper clamp force, is being achieved.

Clearly this method of audit provides a direct measure of the capability of a given tool to develop tension
in the tightened fastener. The results of release angle audits, being directly related to the tension
achieved, are significantly more meaningful than the torque magnitudes obtained from breakaway torque
audits. An improved version of the breakaway torque audit, which uses the torque-angle signature of the
audit, can be used to directly estimate fastener tension. This analysis process correlates precisely with
the release-anglesignature method. The only limitation is that the breakaway audit must be conducted in
the elastic-tightening region for the bolted joint where bolt yield or thread strip are not present.

The following series of tightening, breakaway torque audits and release signatures illustrate the basic
concepts of torque and tension audit using torque-angle signatures. Understanding of the engineering
mechanics of threaded fasteners is greatly enhanced through use of the concept of the "Elastic Origin"
and the application of M-Alpha and F-Alpha diagrams to the audit process.

In the example illustrated in Figure 37, the M12 x 1.75 fastener was tightened to 60 lb-ft (81 Nm). The
signature has been recorded with a "record threshold" of 20 lb-ft (27 Nm). The plot shows both torque and
tension vs. angle of turn, with "0" angle located at the threshold.

Figure 37. Torque & Clamp Force vs. Angle

The signature analysis software can automatically

locate the "elastic origin" on the M-Alpha Diagram by
projecting a tangent line from the final point on the
torque-angle curve to the "0" torque or, if present, the
prevailing torque level.

The M-Alpha Diagram for the installation tightening

signature, shown in Figure 38, illustrates that the
torque resulted in a projected elastic tightening angle
of approximately 85 degrees, resulting in a clamp
force of about 7,500 lb (33,360 Nt.).

30
Figure 38. M-Alpha Diagram from SR1, VDI-2230

The corresponding F-Alpha curve, shown in Figure

39, confirms the relationship between torque and
angle with the concept of the "elastic origin". Note
that the 85-degree elastic-tightening angle for the
bolt results in approximately 7,500 lb. (33,360 Nt.)
clamp force.
Figure 39. F-Alpha Diagram from SR1, VDI-2230

The next signature is the "breakaway" torque audit,

shown in Figure 40, on the bolted joint tightened for
the example shown in Figure 39.
Figure 40. Breakaway Torque Audit

Breakaway hand torque audits are often used to

attempt to correlate dynamic installation torque with
the measured breakaway point. In this example,
the fastener was torqued in the tightening direction
until an additional angle of turn of about 12-13
degrees was attained. Note that the head of the
fastener started to move at about 55 lb-ft (74.5
Nm). Actual breakaway and continuation of the
tightening process occurred at about 65 lb-ft (88
Nm) of applied torque. These observations confirm
the installation torque of 60 lb-ft (81 Nm) as is
normally done for a breakaway torque audit.

The signature analysis diagram shown in Figure 41 is one of the most significant analysis tools developed
in the past 10 years. This diagram shows how it is possible to audit both installation torque and correlate
the signature of the audit curve directly with fastener tension. The projection of the tangent to the torque-
angle signature curve that locates the “elastic origin” is the key to significant improvement of the hand
torque audit process.
Figure 41. Breakaway Audit M-Alpha from SR1, VDI-2230

The M-Alpha Diagram for the audit signature

clearly shows the torque breakaway point related
to the installation torque, and also shows the 85
degree initial tightening angle which correlates
with a pre-load of 7,500 lb. (33,360 Nt.) clamp
force. Note that the breakaway audit increased
the tightening angle to approximately 95-100
degrees projected from the elastic origin, with an
expected proportionate increase in preload.

If the release torque-angle signature is recorded

when a fastener is loosened, as shown in Figure
42, the elastic tightening angle can be estimated,
and thus the approximate fastener tension
released can be directly estimated if the F-Alpha slope for the joint has been established.
31
Figure 42. Release Signature
M-Alpha plots and release-angle plots can be
used to directly estimate bolt tension, or preload,
which is the ultimate goal of the fastener
tightening process. In the example shown in
Figure 50, the release angle of approximately 95
degrees confirms the tightening angle measured
on the M-Alpha Diagram for the hand torque
audit.

To continue the examples of torque-angle-

signature analysis to audit installation torque and
preload, the original fastener used in the initial
example above was stripped of all thread and
underhead lubricants to create higher friction co-
efficients in the thread and underhead regions. The M-alpha diagram for tightening to 60 lb-ft (81 Nm),
shown in Figure 43, indicates a tightening angle of only 25 degrees projected from the elastic origin.
Compared to the lubricated fastener where the tightening angle was 85 degrees the predicted preload of
2200 lb. (9786 Nt.) was confirmed by the clamp force measurement.

Figure 43. M-Alpha Diagram, Tightened Dry

The breakaway audit for the "dry" tightened

fastener, shown in Figure 44, confirms that the
installation torque was approximately 60 lb-ft (81
Nm), and also reveals the expected very low
angle of turn from the elastic origin.

Figure 44. Breakaway M-Alpha Diagram, Dry Fastener

The torque-angle signature method of analysis

applied to tightening and loosening curves is plain,
simple, and straightforward. It is a basic engineering
analysis technique using fundamental stress,
deflection and material strength properties to model
and measure the bolted joint tightening process. The torque angle signatures can be analyzed to
determine installation torque, thread strip, underhead embedment, bolt yield, and most important,
fastener tension. The M-Alpha plots with reference to the elastic origin are directly linked to the SR1
Bolted Joint Design software for Windows 95.9

The technique can be applied to fasteners of all sizes and all grip lengths. While there may be 75 to 100
factors that can alter the tightness of a given bolted joint, the torque-angle signature analysis method
provides a practical method for direct verification of clamp force to assure a quality fastener assembly.

In addition to direct estimation of tension achieved it is possible for the signature analysis method to
detect bolt yield, thread strip and embedment problems. The release-angle signature when compared to
the installation torque-angle can be used to evaluate the clamp load retained after a dynamic test.

9
SR1 Bolted Joint Design Software, Version 6.1+ from RS Technologies, a division of PCB Load & Torque, Inc., Farmington Hills,
Michigan, USA
32
Material creep and embedment phenomena, which lead to loss of pre-load, are readily analyzed and
quantitatively evaluated through use of the release-angle analysis methods.

The methods are particularly powerful in evaluating and comparing the tightening capability of various
manufacturers pulse tools for application on a given assembly or bolted joint.

4.0 Other Strategies

4.1 Torque-Turn-To-Yield
All advanced tightening strategies use both torque and angle of turn to develop clamp force. The most
common application of torque-angle control is the use of a combination of torque and turn-to-yield steps
to achieve the maximum clamp force that a given fastener is capable of attaining.

In torque-turn-to-yield tightening, the fastener is first tightened to a torque level that achieves 60-80
percent of the yield tension. This is followed by an additional angle of turn, usually 90-100 degrees.

While most properly manufactured, high strength fasteners can be tightened to yield, unless the fastener
manufacturer has specifically designed the fastener to be installed with a yield tightening process use this
method with care.

True yield fasteners have a reduced cross-section between the thread and head, where the yielding
occurs before permanent set occurs in the thread section. Common fasteners tightened to yield usually
yield in the threads, creating pitch elongation that makes re-use of such fasteners undesirable.

Fasteners tightened beyond the yield point exhibit strain hardening, yielding at progressively higher
torques each time they are re-used. If the thread and underhead frictions do not change the clamp forces
attained also increase progressively with each subsequent tightening cycle until the elongation capability
of the bolt is exceeded and failure occurs. Certain yield-bolt designs are reported to be capable of 5-6 re-
tightenings.

4.2 Prevailing Torque Locknut Signature Analysis

A method of estimating the clamp force achieved when tightening fasteners with prevailing torque is
illustrated in Figure 45. In the special case of prevailing torque fasteners, the elastic origin is located at
the prevailing torque level not zero torque. Clamp force is proportional to the angle of turn, α, from this
point.

Figure 45. Estimating Clamp Force with Prevailing Torque

4.3 Hand Torque Tightness Quality Audits

Since the desired result is proper fastener
tightness or tension, the ideal audit process
would directly determine the tension in the
fastener. However, since it is not practical to
put strain gages on production assemblies or
use force washers under the head of each
bolt, other techniques had to be developed.

Ultrasonic techniques for measuring bolt

stretch have proven useful in some
applications, but there are practical
limitations for this method as appears to be
the case with most known tension audit
processes.

33
For the last twenty years or more it has been common practice to use hand torque wrenches to audit the
tightness of threaded fasteners. The operator re-torques the fastener by applying a tightening force until
he feels the fastener move. Then he stops and notes the torque level on the wrench's indicator. Un-
fortunately, this measuring technique is highly operator sensitive. The amount of “overshoot” depends on
how quickly the operator responds once he senses that motion has occurred.

The torque-angle plot of the fastener tightening process is the key tool for analysis of the tightening
process. Similarly, the torque-time plot of the hand torque audit process is the key to proper specification
and design of electronic hand torque audit equipment.

Microprocessor-based audit systems must be programmed to detect and analyze torque-time profiles so
that significant data points, which correlate with the known torque-tension relationship, are recorded. In
order to properly program and obtain useful information with a hand torque audit instrument, it is ecessary
to know both what the torque-time signal profile is as well as to which factor the audit instrument has
been programmed to respond.

Experimental studies made during the past several years have shown that the most useful torque reading
that can be obtained with a hand torque audit, occurs at a break point just prior to the start of the turning
motion of the fastener thread. This break point or breakaway torque value is a characteristic of fasteners
with well-lubricated threads and underhead areas. Such torque-tension characteristics exhibit relatively
small scatter and thus more uniformity than found with poorly lubricated threads and underhead regions.
Breakaway torque value is a characteristic of fasteners with well-lubricated threads and under-head
areas. Such torque-tension characteristics exhibit relatively small scatter and thus more uniformity than
found with poorly lubricated threads and under-head regions.

4.3.1 Redefining the Audit

Using a conventional hand torque wrench to audit fasteners is not only operator dependent, it actually
provides a higher torque reading–a peak torque value–rather than the true breakaway torque. When
microprocessor-based instruments were introduced, some companies simply replaced the mechanical
torque wrench with an electronic wrench and data collector and continued to provide peak torque
measurement. As an improvement, others suggested that an angle encoder could be used to determine
when the fastener head moves. However, because encoders typically work in one-degree increments,
this method is not practical. One degree is about three times as far as you want the fastener to move to
accurately determine the breakaway point. This can result in errors of 35 percent or more.

During breakaway testing, force washers were used to monitor the clamping force and act as an indicator
for the breakaway point. The test records clearly showed that the breakaway involves two separate
breaks. This result is easily predicted when you consider that the first break occurs when the underhead
friction is overcome.

After the underhead friction is overcome and the shank of the fastener absorbs a slight additional
torsional wind-up, the thread friction is over come permitting added elongation and tensioning to occur.

Figure 46. Torque-Time Signature with Good Lubrication

Fasteners installed with well-lubricated underhead

areas and threads exhibit a smooth shift in the torque-
time curve at breakaway as illustrated in Figure 46.
Fasteners with poor lubrication do not. There can be a
sharp break and the torque can actually decrease
momentarily before increasing again as shown in
Figure 47.

34
Figure 47. Torque-Time Signature with Poor Lubrication

The significance of the fastener performance

recorders in the development and testing programs
cannot be overemphasized. Perhaps one of the most
important observations that has surfaced in testing
programs was that well lubricated fasteners exhibit a
breakaway torque-time signature with a smooth
break point compared to poorly lubricated fasteners
which exhibit a “snap” or sharp drop at the break
point.

The significance of this difference in signature is

clear when we observe that for the same applied
torque, a fastener with poorly lubricated surfaces
may develop 50 to 70 percent less tension. A conclusion we have made as a result of testing is that the
break point for a well-lubricated fastener occurs at the value of the installation torque, provided that no
relaxation has occurred in the joint. Thus, the quality of the fastener tensioning process can be judged by
proper interpretation of the torque-time breakaway curve.

Through use of microprocessors in portable data collectors, we have now been able to significantly
improve the art of hand torque auditing, by applying careful study of fastener performance characteristics
and using the calculating power of the microprocessor.

One common mistake that is still being made is the attempt to qualify and demonstrate capability of
modern fastener installation equipment through the use of old-fashioned hand torque readings. While it is
possible that peak hand torque readings may occasionally correlate with measured dynamic installation
torques, such attempts are clearly flawed, if only due to the overshoot error introduced by the operator.
The break point analysis method, either with a torque-angle transient recorder or a properly programmed
microprocessor based instrument is the preferred state-of-the-art correlation technique.

Torque angle audit signatures can be evaluated for estimating the clamp force by locating the elastic
origin through projection of the tangent line of the curve after the breakaway point. When auditing is done
in the tightness direction, the tightening process is continued after the breakaway point. This procedure
makes practical use of the natural overshoot of the break point. Refer to Figures 48 and 49.

Figure 48. Projection to Elastic Origin, Good Lubrication

Figure 49. Projection to Elastic Origin, Poor Lubrication

35
4.3.2 Hand Torque Audit Qualification
It is recommended that the torque-time signatures of all hand torque audit tests be recorded and reviewed
prior to specification of equipment and setting numerical limits for such tests. A proper test should always
include torque-angle and or torque-time signature analysis of the installation process. This is absolutely
necessary before any meaningful correlation factor can be established between installation and audit
records.

The release angle torque-tension audit procedure, described in paragraph 3.4, is perhaps the most
powerful and practical method of evaluating the actual clamp force achieved by an installation process.

5.0 Using Torque Angle Records to Determine Joint Stiffness

Use the following procedure to determine joint stiffness through analysis of torque-angle records.
1. Record the torque-angle curve.
2. From the linear elastic range after snugging, determine the clamping torque range, Tc, and the total
clamping angle, αt, as shown in Figure 50.
Figure 50. Clamp Torque and Angle, Effective Bolt Length

3. Assume a value for K, i.e. K = 0.18.

4. Calculate Fc using the following formula.

5. Assume effective length of bolt, Le.

6. Calculate bolt elongation using the following formula.

7. Calculate the turn-to-elongation angle, αb.

8. Model the Force/Deformation and Torque-Angle Diagram (refer to Figure 9 and related discussion).

36
9. Perform Spring Rate Analysis to equate the relative angular and linear deformations.

10. Calculate the deformation, c, of the clamped parts.

11. Estimate the spring rate of the bolt and clamped parts.

12. Estimate the preload efficiency factor.

NOTE: For VDI-2230, FSA=ΦFA=∆F=∆Fe. Refer to the following formulas for rearranging terms.

The variable bolt load, ∆F, due to an external load, Fe, is found by multiplying the efficiency factor, Φ, by
the applied external load, i.e., ∆F= ΦFe.

37
6.0 Material Yield Point

The chart shown below in Figure 51 can be used to estimate the minimum angle of turn which will be
required to stretch a fastener to the material yield point. The chart assumes that the clamped components
have infinite stiffness.

Figure 51. Minimum Turn per Inch of Length vs. Thread Pitch

7.0 Glossary of Important Terms

The following terms, which may be unfamiliar to some readers, are used throughout this paper and are
defined below.

Dkm Effective diameter for the friction in the bolt head or nut bearing area (in., mm)
F Force, general (lb., Nt.)
FM Initial clamping load (assembly preload); the values in the table are calculated with a 90 percent
utilization of the elastic limit using red (lb., Nt.)
FV Preload general (lb, Nt.)
K Nut Factor for basic equation, T = KDF
MA Tightening torque for the assembly until preloading of bolt reaches FM (lb-ft, Nm)
P Pitch of the bolt thread (in., mm)
T Torque, general (lb-ft, Nm)
d Bolt diameter = outside diameter of thread (nominal diameter) (in., mm)
dh Bore diameter of the clamped parts; inner diameter of the substitution cylinder (in., mm)
dw Outer diameter of the plane head bearing surface (at the inlet of the transition radius of the head)
(in., mm)
d2 Pitch diameter of bolt thread (in., mm)

38
µ Coefficient of friction, general
µG Coefficient of friction in thread
µges Average coefficient of friction for thread and bolt head bearing surface
µK Coefficient of friction for bolt head bearing surface
8.0 References
The following publications are recommended for those who would like to obtain more information about
the science, technology, and art of threaded fastener engineering.

John H. Bickford, An Introduction To The Design and Behavior of Bolted Joints. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New
York (1990).

Alexander Blake, Design of Mechanical Joints. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York (1985).

Alexander Blake, What Every Engineer Should Know About Threaded Fasteners Materials and Design.
Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York (1986).

Virgil Moring Faires, Design of Machine Elements, third edition. The Macmillan Company, New York
(1955).

P. G. Forrest, Fatigue of Metals. Pergamon Press, New York; Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.,
Reading, Massachusetts (1962).

Industrial Fasteners Institute, Fastener Standards, fifth edition. Industrial Fasteners Institute, Cleveland,
Ohio (1970).

Industrial Fasteners Institute, Metric Fastener Standards, second edition. Industrial Fasteners Institute,
Cleveland, Ohio (1983).

Robert C. Juvinall, Engineering Consideration of Stress, Strain, and Strength. McGraw-Hill Book
Company, New York (1967).

Robert C. Juvinall, Fundamentals of Machine Component Design. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1983).

Geoffrey L. Kulak, John W. Fisher, John H. A. Struik, Guide to Design Criteria for Bolted and Riveted
Joints, second edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1987).

Joseph Edward Shigley, Mechanical Engineering Design. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1977).

For more information about this and other related Fastening Technology information and products, please
contact:

39
 3425 Walden Avenue, Depew, NY 14043 USA
pcb.com | [email protected] | 800 828 8840 | +1 716 684 0001

© 2021 PCB Piezotronics - all rights reserved. PCB Piezotronics is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Amphenol Corporation. Endevco is an assumed name of PCB Piezotronics of North Carolina, Inc., which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PCB Piezotronics,
Inc. Accumetrics, Inc. and The Modal Shop, Inc. are wholly-owned subsidiaries of PCB Piezotronics, Inc. IMI Sensors and Larson Davis are Divisions of PCB Piezotronics, Inc. Except for any third party marks for which attribution is provided herein, the
company names and product names used in this document may be the registered trademarks or unregistered trademarks of PCB Piezotronics, Inc., PCB Piezotronics of North Carolina, Inc. (d/b/a Endevco), The Modal Shop, Inc. or Accumetrics, Inc.
Detailed trademark ownership information is available at www.pcb.com/trademarkownership.
MD-0428 revNR 0719