0% found this document useful (0 votes)
430 views1 page

IELTS Writing Band Descriptors: Task 2

The document describes the IELTS Writing Band Descriptors for Task 2. It provides a table that outlines nine bands of criteria for task response, coherence and cohesion, lexical resource, and grammatical range and accuracy. The bands describe increasing competence levels in writing ability.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
430 views1 page

IELTS Writing Band Descriptors: Task 2

The document describes the IELTS Writing Band Descriptors for Task 2. It provides a table that outlines nine bands of criteria for task response, coherence and cohesion, lexical resource, and grammatical range and accuracy. The bands describe increasing competence levels in writing ability.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

IELTS Writing Band Descriptors: Task 2 (Public Version)

Band Task response Coherence and cohesion Lexical resource Grammatical range and accuracy
9 • fully addresses all parts of the task • uses cohesion in such a way that it attracts no attention • uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural • uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility
• presents a fully developed position in answer to the • skilfully manages paragraphing and sophisticated control of lexical features; rare and accuracy; rare minor errors occur only as ‘slips’
question with relevant, fully extended and well minor errors occur only as ‘slips’
supported ideas
8 • sufficiently addresses all parts of the task • sequences information and ideas logically • uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly • uses a wide range of structures
• presents a well-developed response to the question • manages all aspects of cohesion well to convey precise meanings • the majority of sentences are error-free
with relevant, extended and supported ideas • uses paragraphing sufficiently and appropriately • skilfully uses uncommon lexical items but there may • makes only very occasional errors or inappropriacies
be occasional inaccuracies in word choice and
collocation
• produces rare errors in spelling and/or word
formation
7 • addresses all parts of the task • logically organises information and ideas; there is clear • uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some • uses a variety of complex structures
• presents a clear position throughout the response progression throughout flexibility and precision • produces frequent error-free sentences
• presents, extends and supports main ideas, but • uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately • uses less common lexical items with some • has good control of grammar and punctuation but
there may be a tendency to over-generalise and/or although there may be some under-/over-use awareness of style and collocation may make a few errors
supporting ideas may lack focus • presents a clear central topic within each paragraph • may produce occasional errors in word choice,
spelling and/or word formation

6 • addresses all parts of the task although some parts • arranges information and ideas coherently and there is • uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task • uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms
may be more fully covered than others a clear overall progression • attempts to use less common vocabulary but with • makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but
• presents a relevant position although the • uses cohesive devices effectively, but cohesion within some inaccuracy they rarely reduce communication
conclusions may become unclear or repetitive and/or between sentences may be faulty or mechanical • makes some errors in spelling and/or word
• presents relevant main ideas but some may be • may not always use referencing clearly or appropriately formation, but they do not impede communication
inadequately developed/unclear • uses paragraphing, but not always logically
5 • addresses the task only partially; the format may be • presents information with some organisation but there • uses a limited range of vocabulary, but this is • uses only a limited range of structures
inappropriate in places may be a lack of overall progression minimally adequate for the task • attempts complex sentences but these tend to be
• expresses a position but the development is not • makes inadequate, inaccurate or over-use of cohesive • may make noticeable errors in spelling and/or word less accurate than simple sentences
always clear and there may be no conclusions devices formation that may cause some difficulty for the • may make frequent grammatical errors and
drawn • may be repetitive because of lack of referencing and reader punctuation may be faulty; errors can cause some
• presents some main ideas but these are limited and substitution difficulty for the reader
not sufficiently developed; there may be irrelevant • may not write in paragraphs, or paragraphing may be
detail inadequate
4 • responds to the task only in a minimal way or the • presents information and ideas but these are not • uses only basic vocabulary which may be used • uses only a very limited range of structures with only
answer is tangential; the format may be arranged coherently and there is no clear progression repetitively or which may be inappropriate for the rare use of subordinate clauses
inappropriate in the response task • some structures are accurate but errors
• presents a position but this is unclear • uses some basic cohesive devices but these may be • has limited control of word formation and/or spelling; predominate, and punctuation is often faulty
• presents some main ideas but these are difficult to inaccurate or repetitive errors may cause strain for the reader
identify and may be repetitive, irrelevant or not well • may not write in paragraphs or their use may be
supported confusing
3 • does not adequately address any part of the task • does not organise ideas logically • uses only a very limited range of words and • attempts sentence forms but errors in grammar and
• does not express a clear position • may use a very limited range of cohesive devices, and expressions with very limited control of word punctuation predominate and distort the meaning
• presents few ideas, which are largely undeveloped those used may not indicate a logical relationship formation and/or spelling
or irrelevant between ideas • errors may severely distort the message
2 • barely responds to the task • has very little control of organisational features • uses an extremely limited range of vocabulary; • cannot use sentence forms except in memorised
• does not express a position essentially no control of word formation and/or phrases
• may attempt to present one or two ideas but there is spelling
no development
1 • answer is completely unrelated to the task • fails to communicate any message • can only use a few isolated words • cannot use sentence forms at all
0 • does not attend
• does not attempt the task in any way
• writes a totally memorised response
©
UCLES 2005

You might also like