Study Guide No 3 PART 2
Study Guide No 3 PART 2
Jelyne Guadalupe
Atty
PART II
1. What is an admission?
2. Read and digest the case of Estrada v. Desierto, G.R. Nos. 146710-
15, April 3, 2001.
5. Read and digest the case of Tan v. Rodil Enterprises, G.R. No.
168071, December 18, 2006.
1|PeejayNotes
Evidence Atty. Jelyne Guadalupe
Atty
2|PeejayNotes
Evidence Atty. Jelyne Guadalupe
Atty
8. Read and digest the case of San Miguel Corp. v. Kalalo, G.R. No.
185522, June 13, 2012.
9. Read and digest the case of People v. Nazareno, G.R. No. 180915,
August 9, 2010.
10. Read and digest the case of People v. Abadies, G.R. Nos. 139346-50.
July 11, 2002.
12. Read and digest the case of People v. Bangcado, G.R. No. 132330,
November 28, 2000
3|PeejayNotes
Evidence Atty. Jelyne Guadalupe
Atty
14. Read and digest the case of People v. Cachuela, G.R. No. 191752,
June 10, 2013.
15. What are the requisites for the declaration made by a partner/agent
to be binding upon the partnership/principal?
16. What is the ruling of the Supreme Court in the case of Estrada v.
Desierto, G.R. Nos. 146710-15. April 3, 2001 in relation the exceptions on
the RES INTER ALIOS ACTA RULE?
4|PeejayNotes
Evidence Atty. Jelyne Guadalupe
Atty
17. Read and digest the case of Salapuddin v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
184681, February 25, 2013.
18. What are the requisites for the exception provided for under Section
31?
5|PeejayNotes
Evidence Atty. Jelyne Guadalupe
Atty
20. Read and digest the case of Gevero v. IAC, G.R.No. 77029, August
30, 1990.
21. What is the ruling in the case of Estrada v. Desierto, G.R. Nos.
146710-15. April 3, 2001 related to ADMISSION BY SILENCE (ADOPTIVE
ADMISSION)?
22. Read and digest the case of People v. Castañeda, G.R. No. 208290,
December 11, 2013.
23. Read and digest the case of People v. Guillen, G.R. No. 191756,
November 25, 2013.
6|PeejayNotes
Evidence Atty. Jelyne Guadalupe
Atty
24. What is the ruling in Salapuddin v. CA, G.R. No. 184681, Feb. 25,
2013 related to extrajudicial confessions?
Evidence that one did or did not do a certain thing at one time is not
admissible to prove that he did or did not do the same or similar thing at
another time. (Sec. 34, Rule 130)
26. Read and digest the case of People v. Losano, G.R. No. 127122. July
20, 1999.
27. Read and digest the case of People v. Nardo, G.R. No. 133888, March
1, 2000.
28. Read and digest the case of People v. Pineda, G.R. No. 141644, May
27, 2004.
29. Read and digest the case of People v. Magpayo, G.R. Nos. 92961-64,
September 1, 1993.
7|PeejayNotes
Evidence Atty. Jelyne Guadalupe
Atty
30. Under the Civil Code, what constitutes a valid tender of payment?
What the relation of the civil law concept of tender of payment to Section
36 of Rule 130 of the Rules of Court?
8|PeejayNotes