Financial Satisfaction of Street Vendors
Financial Satisfaction of Street Vendors
Abstract
The core objective of study is to examine effect of financial stressor and financial socialization on
financial satisfaction. The financial level of behavior plays mediating and customer relationship
management plays moderating role. The target area of the research study was the State of Azad
Jammu & Kashmir. Nature of research study was explanatory. Street vendors of the state of Azad
Jammu and Kashmir were the target population. Sample size was 332 street vendors. Convenience
method of sampling was used for the data collection from the respondents with an adapted
Questionnaire. Demographic statistics of respondents were analyzed and elaborated. Most of the
respondents have matriculation SSC (Secondary School Certificate), the larger age group of
respondents was 18 – 26 years. Most of respondents were unmarried who took part in survey. In
the starting phase of data analyses SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) considered for
initial scrutiny of the data. After the thorough investigation of the data collected, the data was
substituted to SmartPLS 3.2.8. This software is more recommended for data analysis because there
is no need to require the assumptions of normality. Mean, Standard Deviation (S.D), Variance,
Correlation, Discriminant Validity, and HTMT ratio were interpreted and elaborated. Analysis
demonstrated that all variables were internally consistent. Analysis also testified that there is no
convergent validity and reliability issue was found. All the values were as per the threshold as well
as satisfactory level. The research study also assessed the predictive relevance by considering the
Blindfolding procedure, which put emphasizes to predict the overall capability of framework.
Study revealed that financial behavior positively influence the financial satisfaction.
Introduction
The composition of street vendors is different across the world (Bhowmik, 2005). To drive the urban
economy, street vendors hold an essential place (Cross, 1998). It came out as a source of livelihood
in urban spaces. People living in countries with huge population are relying on street vending. It
has been known for ease of establishment, and fewer regulations as compare to traditional
businesses (Sekhani et al., 2019). The core level of concept of negotiation, the ultimate level of
power and close linkage of the social network system as well as phenomenon of perception is
utilized to closely analyze the various aspects and strategies of the vendors who are mainly in
streets have utilized in getting the main access to the public spaces which are mainly in urban areas
in various parts of the globe. The street vendors have elaborated the well organized and combined
firmed political force which through the engagement of different strategies and well set
approaches, persist the or to avoid the force and overall power of the authorities of the city and
being start to utilize the spaces of public. These core and main strategies clearly elaborated as the
reflecting the power of political phenomenon of the street vendors in most of the developing
countries of the globe. Because of the street vendors and the core regulators might have and utilize
Governments in developing and developed parts of the world are working on regulating this
profession. They want to make it a formal set regulation for street vendors to business and earn
their bread and butter (Huang et al., 2019). Restructuring of economic policies are providing
support to the street vendors to do business (Turner & Schoenberger, 2012). Emerging economic
powers like China are encouraging street vendor culture termed as “Night Markets.” The concept
behind is to better utilize time and space and products that are not easily sold in traditional shelves
of shops. Even developed economies like the USA are working to bring regulation for street
vendors. The focus put on the importance of regulating this profession is backed by the amount of
There are studies focusing on regulating the street vending business, hygiene aspect of street
vendors, food safety and economic contribution (Hummel, 2017; Trafialek et al., 2017), however,
there is a dearth in contemporary literature on financial satisfaction of street vendors. Aye and
Varma (2016), reported that the level of stress a street vendor faces has a direct influence on his/her
psychological wellbeing. Therefore, it is essential to build recent literature on the stress and
This research study contribute towards recent literature on financial satisfaction of the street
vendors by elaborating impact of Financial Stress, Financial Socialization, and Financial Behavior
Management. This study took place on street vendors of the Mirpur, Azad Kashmir, the disputed
Financial Stress
Hereby Kim et al. (2003), inferred about the financial stress that, a psychological condition and
incapability of an individual to fulfill his/her financial needs and responsibilities. This financial
situation has direct negative influence on different aspects of an individual’s life including mental
health (Drentea & Lavrakas, 2000), well-being (Northern et al., 2010) and personality in particular
(Choi, 2005). However, a positive financial standing is linked to lower financial stress. Besides, a
positive financial behavior paves the way to lower the financial stress, like conscious spending,
In other words, financial stress, financial behavior, and satisfaction of financial phenomenon are
linked in a way that financial stress may lead to positive or negative financial behavior (Britt et al.,
2015), while financial behavior forms financial satisfaction (Aboagye & Jung, 2018; Coskuner, 2016).
Britt et al. (2015), elaborated determinants of financial stress between college students as well as
found that lack of financial recourses, higher financial knowledge, and negative perceptions lead
The firm connection among phenomenon of financial stress, financial behavior, and dimension of
financial satisfaction is evident from previous studies on different settings of the population. The
major work is done on financial stress and satisfaction of the students (Baker & Montalto, 2019;
Britt et al., 2017; Britt et al., 2015; Gregory et al., 2018; Mukherjee et al., 2017; Ray, 2017; Robb,
2017), with the findings that financial stress leads to an abrupt financial behavior that ends up
leaving students financially unsatisfied. In another study of Canadian households, Brzozowski and
Visano (2017), asserted an overwhelming effect of financial stress on financial wellbeing and life
satisfaction. Hence, financial stress has both have direct and indirect effect of financial satisfaction.
Financial Socialization
A concept under which an individual possesses a set of specific skills, values, behavior and
knowledge of the marketplace to gain financial viability and wellbeing is considered financial
socialization (Danes, 1994; Ward, 1974). Therefore, the concept is not merely mastering the
economic and financial dealings, rather it is developing interpersonal skills to control financial
capability and well-being (Danes, 1994). Although, financial socialization takes places at every
stage of an individual’s life, however, the best development phase for financial socialization is
Parents, educators, peers media, and self-learning are the primary role player in financial
socialization, while, parents are considered to be the most critical (Gudmunson et al., 2016).
Mohamed (2017), also argued favorably that the parents are considered as best source of acquiring
financial knowledge that further contributes towards financial socialization. The study also
suggested that there is strong positive relationship among dimension of financial knowledge,
Examining influence of financial socialization on young adults, Glenn (2018), claimed that financial
socialization has direct impact on financial behavior. While Fan and Chatterjee (2019), suggested
based on their findings that students who had the financial knowledge and financial socialization,
faced less stress on their student loans and found to be satisfied. In another set of respondents in
India, Saurabh and Nandan (2018), also found a positive relationship between these variables.
Financial Behavior
financial behavior (Britt et al., 2015). In other words, administration of financial recourses to cope
up with financial needs, either personal or for a household, comes under financial dimension
behavior (Loix et al., 2005). A positive financial behavior consists of short term as well as long
term financial planning. A. Ali et al. (2015), suggested several salient features of a positive financial
behavior mentioning budget preparation for expenses, long-term savings, and arrangements made
There are several predictors of financial behavior identified by many researchers in the recent past.
For example, the study of Kaiser and Menkhoff (2016), suggests that financial socialization, family
financial socialization, in particular, can form a positive financial behavior. While having good
self-control in terms of saving and conscious spending also establishes better financial behavior
(Strömbäck et al., 2017). Financial literacy came as strongest among other predictors of sound
financial behavior (Kaiser & Menkhoff, 2017; Stolper & Walter, 2017).
It is based on evidence from past researches that dimension of financial behavior is used as a strong
predictor of financial satisfaction (Aboagye & Jung, 2018; A. Ali et al., 2015; Brzozowski &
Visano, 2017; Fan & Chatterjee, 2019; Saurabh & Nandan, 2018). Financial behavior comes in
among financial satisfaction and financial stress. If financial behavior is positive, it will lead to
financial satisfaction, and if it is not favorable, it will result in financial stress (Dowling et al.,
2009). Fan and Chatterjee (2019), also argued in this regard that financial knowledge and financial
One of the critical role players in street vending business is social networking of the vendors with
the customers(Raj, 2017) . Because of network proximity, the interaction between the vendors and
sellers becomes very frequent. Along with economic transactions, an exchange of information on
general or social issues becomes a general practice. These frequent interactions and general
discussions go so deep that buying and selling becomes a secondary objective of both the parties
Stronger customer relationships is an indication of customer loyalty (Dick & Basu, 1994). Since the
relationship of street vendors with their customers is secure, and customers are loyal to their
specific street vendors, this gives a sense of financial relief to the street vendors. If the customer
is loyal to the vendors, the vendors are satisfied that they have a strong customer base and secure
source of income. This paper aims to integrate this as a moderator to have test the relationship
between financial satisfaction and dimension of financial behavior, financial stress, and financial
socialization. Model of this paper will depict linkage of financial level of stress and financial
dependent variable with a moderating role of the Customer relationship management of street
vendors will come among the phenomenon of financial behavior and financial satisfaction.
H4: customer relationship management has a moderating impact on the relationship of financial
Research methodology
Research Design
This research study has taken place on the population of state of Azad Jammu and Kashmir to
provide crystal insight into the financial satisfaction of vendors. This is an explanatory study to
determine the moderating role of customer relationship management of street vendors between the
financial socialization and financial stress on the financial satisfaction. Financial behavior plays
mediating role in this relationship. Quantitative study is employed in this research that helps to
quantify the results and helps for the generalization of the findings.
Street vendors of Azad Kashmir are target population of the study. Data is collected through survey
method from 322 street vendors. Probability sampling method could not be useful if the sampling
frame is unavailable (Memon et al., 2017). Thus, Convenience sampling is employed for the data
collection from the respondents. The study took five months accumulatively for the process of data
To measuring financial stress of the respondents four indicators are adapted from the studies of
(Lim et al., 2014). For the measurement of financial socialization seven items are adapted from
Hira et al. (2013). Financial behavior measured with six statements which adapted from Grable and
Joo (2001). Financial satisfaction measured with seven indicators adapted from Lown and Ju (1992).
While the measurement of the customer relationship management is with the five items used by
Demo and Rozzett (2013). SmartPLS is used for the data analysis as recommended by the studies of
NP4 Customers are willing to buy all other products that I 1-5
sell.
NP5 The product I sell are a good value of money. 1-5
FSat Financial Satisfaction 1-5
FSat2 Amount and pool of saving 1-5
FSat3 Financial Management Skills 1-5
FSat4 Current Financial Situation 1-5
FSat5 Ability to meet wants and needs 1-5
FSat6 Saving for emergency needs 1-5
FSat7 Affordability to spend 1-5
Data Analysis
Demographics characteristics
Demographics N %
Education Level
SSC 237 73.6 %
HSSC 83 25.8 %
Graduation 2 0.6 %
Age
18 to 26 years 86 26.7 %
27 to 35 years 175 54.3 %
36 to 44 years 61 18.9 %
Marital Status
Married 103 32.0 %
Single 219 68.0 %
Statistical table indicates that approximately 73.6% (n=237) of the respondents had SSC
(secondary school certificate) education, 25.8% (n=83) had HSSC (higher secondary school
certificate) and only 0.6% (n=2) had graduation as their qualification. Furthermore, analysis found
that 26.7 % (n=86) were from the age group of 18-26 years, approximately 54.3% (n=175) fall
under the age group of 27-35 years and the 18.9% (n=61) were 36-44 years old. About the 32.0%
(n=103) respondents were married and approximately 68.0% (n=219) were females who
foe data cleaning and screening. In the data cleaning and screening process researchers identify
the error value, missing values (through multiple imputations) and the common method biased
(CMB). It is necessary to check the CMB because the data was collected from the single origin
recommended by the (Podsakoff et al., 2003). This study further utilized SmartPLS recommended
by the (Ringle et al., 2015) because it does not required the normality assumptions and the excellent
S/ Va CR
Variables N M SD FB FSat FSo FSt Mod
N r M
1 Financial 32 3.3 0.7
0.50 0.74
Behavior 2 2 1
2 0.61
Financial 32 3.0 0.7
0.59 (0.71 0.79
Satisfaction 2 3 6
)
3 Financial 0.20 0.11
32 3.7 0.7
Socializatio 0.62 (0.22 (0.11 0.75
2 1 8
n ) )
4 0.54 0.51 0.16
Financial 32 3.0 0.8
0.67 (0.66 (0.61 (0.17 0.78
Stress 2 6 2
) ) )
5 -0.17 -0.17 0.01 -0.01
Moderating 32
- - - (0.19 (0.18 (0.05 (0.03 1.00
Effect 1 2
) ) ) )
6 Customer
0.62 0.65 0.15 0.65 -0.05
Relationship 32 2.8 0.8
0.74 (0.72 (0.73 (0.17 (0.80 (0.09 0.79
Managemen 2 4 6
) ) ) ) )
t
SmartPLS 3.2.8 utilized for data analysis since it is highly recommended by prior researcher
(Ringle et al., 2015). Statistics revealed that mean, standard deviation, variance, correlation,
discriminant validity, and HTMT ratio. Discriminant level of validity (square root of AVE) shows
whether the construct of the framework is correlated with each other or not. All values of diagonal
should be higher than correlation values (Henseler et al., 2015; Muhammad, 2019). Values in small
bracket present Heterotrait-Monotrait (HTMT) ratio. The threshold of HTMT is <0.85 suggested
by (Kline, 2015). Statistics declares that there is no discriminant and HTMT validity issue in the
framework.
Analysis demonstrate that internal consistency, Composite reliability and AVE of financial
financial stress (α=0.789, CR=0.862 and AVE=0.611) and customer relationship management
(α=0.853, CR=0.895 and AVE=0.630). The acceptable value of internal consistency is > 0.70
recommended by Cortina (1993). Composite reliability threshold is also > 0.70 as endorsed by
Ramayah et al. (2016), and Average variance extracted cut off point should be > 0.50 (Fornell &
Larcker, 1981). Analysis testified that there is no convergent validity and reliability issue found.
SRMR value is 0.071 which is <0.08 (Hu & Bentler, 1998).d_ULS Values are quite similar to SRMR
value. Hence, it is not necessary to discuss. Value of the normed fit index is 0.789, which should
be > 0.90 (Bentler & Bonett, 1980). Statics validates that the all the threshold are as on per
satisfactory level.
t- P-
Hypothesis Coefficient SE Decision
statistics value
FB -> FS 0.315 0.058 5.443 0.000 Supported
FSo. ->FB 0.113 0.039 2.876 0.004 Supported
FS ->FB 0.527 0.045 11.779 0.000 Supported
Moderating Effect 1 ->FSat. -0.082 0.038 2.130 0.034 Supported
CRM ->FSat. 0.452 0.053 8.492 0.000 Supported
Statistics revealed that financial behavior positively influence financial satisfaction (β=0.315,
t=5.443, p=0.000***), whereas financial socialization and financial stress also has impact on
p=0.034**). Financial socialization and financial stress have positive effect on dimension of
financial satisfaction through the linkage of mediating role of phenomenon of financial behavior
(t=2.525, p=0.012***) and (t=4.927, p=0.000***) respectively. Specific indirect effect of the
financial socialization and financial stress on the financial satisfaction with mediating role of
financial behavior is also significant with the values (t=2.518, p=0.012**) and (t=5.204,
Coefficient determination (R2) value of financial satisfaction and financial behavior was
(R2=0.504) and (R2=0.310) respectively. Financial behavior has small effect size on financial
satisfaction (f2=0.120), while Financial stress has the high effect, financial socialization has no
effect size, and customer relationship management has medium effect size on financial satisfaction
(f2=0.391), (f2=0.018) and (f2=0.252) respectively. Results also indicate that the effect size for all
possible variables is acceptable except financial socialization. According to the Cohen (1988), 0.02
indicate small, 0.15 shows medium and the 0.35 illustrate the large effect size. Current study also
assessed the variance inflation factor, all the VIF values are <5 which is in line to the studies of
Conclusively, study assessed predictive level of relevance by using the blindfolding procedure.
Henseler et al. (2009), put emphasis to use the predictive relevance which can predict the capability
of the framework. Akter et al. (2011), stated that the Q2 is commonly predicted by using the
elimination of the distance of the 5-10 in the partial least square. The threshold of the Q2 is > 0
which means the framework has predictive level of relevance of endogenous construct. Statistics
found that value of predictive relevance of financial satisfaction and financial behavior was
(Q2=0.260) and (Q2=0.160), respectively. Statistics indicated that the value of financial behavior
and financial satisfaction has > 0, which indicates that framework has ample predictive level of
relevance. Value of the 0.02 indicated small, 0.15 express medium and the 0.35 illustrate the large
Financial behavior playing mediating role among financial stress and financial dimension of
socialization and financial satisfaction. Customer relationship plays moderating role among
financial behavior and financial dimension of satisfaction. These relationships determine that
whole chunks of impact of financial stressor and financial socialization taken by the financial
behavior. Thus, financial behavior is the major component in the financial stress and financial
Current study found that the financial stress significantly influence the financial behavior as
suggested by Services (1991). Results also illustrated that financial socialization has a positive
influence on the financial behavior. These results are backed by study of W. Ali et al. (2019).
Financial behavior has favorable and the significant effect on the financial satisfaction of street
vendors while these results are same as the previous study of Joo and Grable (2004). Customer
relationship management plays moderating role among financial behavior and financial
The implications of study are favorable for the financial planners, who can enhance the financial
satisfaction of people which leads to increased the life satisfaction (Saurabh & Nandan, 2018). Public
policy makers can also use these findings for the development of sympathetic policies. Finding of
study will try to contribute towards building a recent literature on street vendor’s financial
satisfaction with drawing guidelines for the financial advisors. Street vendors may also benefit
from the study and in a way to enhance their customer relationship management. However, in
order for the street vendors to flourish their businesses, government policies and regulation play a
critical role. Especially in developing countries like Pakistan, it is mandatory for the government
to regulate the street vending business so that the street vendors may have a stable business and
Present study prone with some limitations same as prior studies by Saurabh and Nandan (2018). This
study is conducted only in the main city of Azad Kashmir with the medium sample size. Current
study used convenience sampling (non-probability) method which has impact on the generalization
of the results. Probability sampling method can provide more authentic results. Several
demographics as well as socio related economic factors also influence on the financial level of
satisfaction. Current study does not consider any demographic and socio-economic factors, which
Study used the financial behavior as mediating variable while future studies can also use the
financial risk attitude as mediating variable. This was conducted to determine the financial
satisfaction of street vendors only, whereas, future studies can also examine the financial
satisfaction in different contexts. This study conducted in Azad Kashmir, migration of the peoples
is the major issue of the Azad Kashmir (Ghulam et al., 2019), future study could be conducted to
determine the financial satisfaction of migrated peoples. Further studies can also examine the
effect of socio level of economic and several demographic variables, which may help to test further
relationship. Plethora of research studies employed gender and the age as moderating variable
which also recommended as an area for future studies that can use the cultural aspects as
moderating variables.
Conclusion
The conclusion drawn from the research study that most of the street vendors’ respondents has
SSC (Secondary School Certificate). It can be concluded that there are some root causes, which
compel them to form such profession of street vendors. Statistics revealed that financial level of
behavior positively influence the financial satisfaction. There is impact of dimension of financial
socialization and financial stress on the financial behavior. Customer Relationship Management
(CRM) positively influence financial satisfaction. Furthermore, research study also elaborated
financial stress have positive effect on phenomena of financial satisfaction, through mediating role
of financial behavior. Specific indirect effect of the financial socialization and financial stress on
the financial satisfaction with the mediation role of financial behavior. Study also revealed that the
entire hypothesis are being supported. Hypothesis was that financial stress directly influences
financial behavior is accepted as per the threshold value and results of the study. Financial
socialization with a positive impact of financial behavior is also accepted. Financial behavior
Management has moderating impact on relationship of financial behavior and financial dimension
References
Aboagye, J., & Jung, J. Y. (2018). Debt holding, financial behavior, and financial satisfaction.
Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 29(2), 208-218.
Akter, S., D'Ambra, J., & Ray, P. (2011). Trustworthiness in mHealth information services: an
assessment of a hierarchical model with mediating and moderating effects using partial
least squares (PLS). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology, 62(1), 100-116.
Ali, A., Rahman, M. S. A., & Bakar, A. (2015). Financial satisfaction and the influence of
financial literacy in Malaysia. Social Indicators Research, 120(1), 137-156.
Ali, W., Javaid, R., Ali, S., Akram, Y., & Haq, A. U. (2019). Influence of life events on the
financial satisfaction of individuals. IBT Journal of Business Studies, 15(1), 123-137.
Aye, N. S. L., & Varma, P. (2016). Factors influencing the psychological well-being of street
venodrs in HPA-An township, Karen State, Myanmar: a path analytic study. Scholar:
Human Sciences, 8(1), 28.
Baker, A. R., & Montalto, C. P. (2019). Student Loan Debt and Financial Stress: Implications for
Academic Performance. Journal of College Student Development, 60(1), 115-120.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of
covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588.
Bhowmik, S. K. (2003). National policy for street vendors. Economic and Political Weekly,
1543-1546.
Bhowmik, S. K. (2005). Street vendors in Asia: a review. Economic and political weekly, 2256-
2264.
Britt, S. L., Ammerman, D. A., Barrett, S. F., & Jones, S. (2017). Student loans, financial stress,
and college student retention. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 47(1), 3.
Britt, S. L., Canale, A., Fernatt, F., Stutz, K., & Tibbetts, R. (2015). Financial Stress and
Financial Counseling: Helping College Students. Journal of Financial Counseling and
Planning, 26(2), 172-186.
Brzozowski, M., & Visano, B. S. (2017). “Havin’Money’s Not Everything, Not Havin’It Is”:
The Importance of Financial Satisfaction for Life Satisfaction in Financially Stressed
Households. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1-19.
Choi, J. a. (2005). New generation’s career aspirations and new ways of marginalization in a
postindustrial economy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(2), 269-283.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power for the Behavioural Sciences. Hilsdale. NY: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
Cross, J. C. (1998). Informal politics: Street vendors and the state in Mexico City: Stanford
University Press.
Demo, G., & Rozzett, K. (2013). Customer relationship management scale for the business-to-
consumer market: exploratory and confirmatory validation and models comparison.
International Business Research, 6(11), 29-42.
Dick, A. S., & Basu, K. (1994). Customer loyalty: toward an integrated conceptual framework.
Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 22(2), 99-113.
Dowling, N., Tim, C., & Hoiles, L. (2009). Financial management practices and money attitudes
as determinants of financial problems and dissatisfaction in young male Australian
workers. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 20(2).
Drentea, P., & Lavrakas, P. J. (2000). Over the limit: the association among health, race and
debt. Social science & medicine, 50(4), 517-529.
Drever, A. I., Odders‐White, E., Kalish, C. W., Else‐Quest, N. M., Hoagland, E. M., & Nelms, E.
N. (2015). Foundations of financial well‐being: Insights into the role of executive
function, financial socialization, and experience‐based learning in childhood and youth.
Journal of Consumer Affairs, 49(1), 13-38.
Fan, L., & Chatterjee, S. (2019). Financial Socialization, Financial Education, and Student Loan
Debt. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 40(1), 74-85.
Forkuor, J. B., Akuoko, K. O., & Yeboah, E. H. (2017). Negotiation and management strategies
of street vendors in developing countries: A narrative review. Sage Open, 7(1),
2158244017691563.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable
variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
Ghulam, W. A., Ali, W., Ali, S., Khan, M. M., Khan, R. N. A., & Farooq, M. (2019).
Investigating Factors Influencing Brain Drain of Citizens of Azad Kashmir Pakistan. The
Journal of Social Sciences Research, 5(3), 782-788.
Grable, J. E., & Joo, S.-h. (2001). A further examination of financial help-seeking behavior.
Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 12(1), 55.
Gregory, K., Matthew, S., & Baguley, J. (2018). Analysis of the costs of veterinary education
and factors associated with financial stress among veterinary students in Australia.
Australian veterinary journal, 96(1-2), 11-16.
Gudmunson, C. G., Ray, S. K., & Xiao, J. J. (2016). Financial socialization. In Handbook of
consumer finance research (pp. 61-72): Springer.
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares
structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): Sage publications.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant
validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of
marketing science, 43(1), 115-135.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path
modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing (pp.
277-319): Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Hira, T. K., Sabri, M. F., & Loibl, C. (2013). Financial socialization's impact on investment
orientation and household net worth. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(1),
29-35.
Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to
underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological methods, 3(4), 424.
Huang, G., Xue, D., & Wang, Y. (2019). Governmentality and Spatial Strategies: Towards
Formalization of Street Vendors in Guangzhou, China. International Journal of Urban
and Regional Research, 43(3), 442-459.
Hummel, C. (2017). Disobedient markets: street vendors, enforcement, and state intervention in
collective action. Comparative Political Studies, 50(11), 1524-1555.
Joo, S.-h., & Grable, J. E. (2004). An Exploratory Framework of the Determinants of Financial
Satisfaction. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 25(1), 25-50. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JEEI.0000016722.37994.9f.
doi:10.1023/B:JEEI.0000016722.37994.9f
Kaiser, T., & Menkhoff, L. (2016). Does financial education impact financial behavior, and if so,
when. Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin.
Kaiser, T., & Menkhoff, L. (2017). Does financial education impact financial literacy and
financial behavior, and if so, when? : The World Bank.
Kim, J., Garman, E. T., & Sorhaindo, B. (2003). Relationships among credit counseling clients'
financial wellbeing, financial behaviors, financial stressor events, and health. Journal of
Financial Counseling and Planning, 14(2).
Lim, H., Heckman, S., Montalto, C. P., & Letkiewicz, J. (2014). Financial stress, self-efficacy,
and financial help-seeking behavior of college students. Journal of Financial Counseling
and Planning, 25(2), 148-160.
Loix, E., Pepermans, R., Mentens, C., Goedee, M., & Jegers, M. (2005). Orientation toward
finances: Development of a measurement scale. The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 6(4),
192-201.
Lown, J. M., & Ju, I.-S. (1992). A model of credit use and financial satisfaction. Financial
Counseling and Planning, 3(1), 105-124.
Memon, M., Ting, H., Ramayah, T., Chuah, F., & Cheah, J. (2017). A review of the
methodological misconceptions and guidelines related to the application of structural
equation modeling: A Malaysian scenario. Journal of applied structural equation
modeling, 1(1), 1-13.
Muhammad, F. W., Ali; Waqar, Younas; Qasim, Qureshi. (2019). THE ERA OF
TRANSFORMATIVE MARKETING: SERVICE QUALITY OF MOBILE APP BASED
TAXI SERVICES IN KUALA LUMPUR. Paper presented at the Quality Festival 2019.
http://www.cqm.rs/2019/papers_iqc/6.pdf
Mukherjee, M., McKinney, L., Hagedorn, L. S., Purnamasari, A., & Martinez, F. S. (2017).
Stretching every dollar: The impact of personal financial stress on the enrollment
behaviors of working and nonworking community college students. Community College
Journal of Research and Practice, 41(9), 551-565.
Northern, J. J., O'Brien, W. H., & Goetz, P. W. (2010). The development, evaluation, and
validation of a financial stress scale for undergraduate students. Journal of College
Student Development, 51(1), 79-92.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method
biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended
remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879.
Ramayah, T., Cheah, J., Chuah, F., Ting, H., & Memon, M. A. (2016). Partial least squares
structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0: An updated and practical
guide to statistical analysis. In: Pearson Singapore.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS
GmbH.
Robb, C. A. (2017). College student financial stress: Are the kids alright? Journal of Family and
Economic Issues, 38(4), 514-527.
Saurabh, K., & Nandan, T. (2018). Role of financial risk attitude and financial behavior as
mediators in financial satisfaction: Empirical evidence from India. South Asian Journal of
Business Studies, 7(2), 207-224.
Sekhani, R., Mohan, D., & Medipally, S. (2019). Street vending in urban ‘informal’markets:
Reflections from case-studies of street vendors in Delhi (India) and Phnom Penh City
(Cambodia). Cities, 89, 120-129.
Serido, J., Shim, S., Mishra, A., & Tang, C. (2010). Financial parenting, financial coping
behaviors, and well‐being of emerging adults. Family Relations, 59(4), 453-464.
Stolper, O. A., & Walter, A. (2017). Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior.
Journal of Business Economics, 87(5), 581-643.
Strömbäck, C., Lind, T., Skagerlund, K., Västfjäll, D., & Tinghög, G. (2017). Does self-control
predict financial behavior and financial well-being? Journal of Behavioral and
Experimental Finance, 14, 30-38.
Trafialek, J., Drosinos, E. H., & Kolanowski, W. (2017). Evaluation of street food vendors’
hygienic practices using fast observation questionnaire. Food control, 80, 350-359.
Turner, S., & Schoenberger, L. (2012). Street vendor livelihoods and everyday politics in Hanoi,
Vietnam: the seeds of a diverse economy? Urban Studies, 49(5), 1027-1044.