OB Unit-1
OB Unit-1
1 ORGANISATIONAL BEHAVIOUR
Introduction:
Human behavior in an organization is generally concerned with the thoughts, feelings, emotions
and actions of the people working in it. To understand any one individual and his behavior is a
challenge, but to understand group behavior in an organization is a very complex managerial
task. That is why it is rightly said that the success of any organization primarily depends upon
the efficiency and effectiveness of the management, and the effectiveness of the management
depends primarily on its human skills and how well it understands the needs and desires of the
people working in the organization.
Human behavior in organizations is a relatively new concept and it emerged as a distinct field of
study in the 1950’s and early 1960’s. This study has changed the traditional belief of the
managers that all the managerial and organizational problems are technical in nature. The
managers now understand that to make their organizations more effective, they have to
understand and predict the human behavior in the organizations.
OB is an area of study that investigates the impact that individuals, groups and structure have on
behavior within organizations.
An organization is an organized body of people with a particular purpose and the people
themselves are regarded as the most important organizational asset. ‘Organizational behavior
(OB) studies how interaction occurs between people in a work setting, ' This will then enable
the managers to improve job satisfaction and stimulate innovation and creativity, thus creating a
dynamic working climate.
Definitions of OB:
According to Fred Luhans, “Organizational behavior directly concerned with the understanding,
prediction, and control of human behavior in organization.”
According to Stephen P. Robbins, “OB is a field of study that investigates the impact that
individuals, groups, and structure have on behavior within organizations for the purpose of
applying such knowledge towards improving an organization’s effectiveness.”
According Keith Davis and J.W. Newstrom, “OB is the study and application of knowledge
about how people act within organizations. It is a human tool for human benefit. It applies
broadly to the behavior of people in all types of organizations such as business, government,
schools, and service organizations.”
Multi-Disciplinary Approach
Normative Science
Social Science
Integrating approach
An Inexact Science
A Dynamic discipline
4) Science and Art: Organizational behavior is considered a science as well as an art. Science
because it involves the use of scientific methods and art because it deals with the behavior of
individuals. OB is both a science as well as an art. The knowledge about human behavior proves
it a science while application of this knowledge and skill clearly leads towards beings an art.
9) Social Science: OB is a social science because its main subject matter is people and their
behavior. It is an elective field of study that integrates behavioral science like psychology,
sociology, anthropology, etc.
11) An Inexact Science: OB is an inexact science. It cannot provide specific answers to specific
organizational problems. The exact prediction of the behavior of people in organizations is also
not possible. "It is possible to predict relationships between variables on a broad scale but it is
difficult to apply predictive models on an individual basis."
12) A Dynamic discipline: OB is a very dynamic discipline. Its main focus is on human
behavior but does not ignore the technical component of the organizations at all. It fully
appreciates and recognizes the constraints of the working environment.
Scope of OB:
OB is the study of human behavior at work in organizations. Accordingly the scope of OB
includes the study of individuals, groups and organization/structure. The aspects of these three
are –
Groups of individuals: Groups include aspects such as group dynamics, group conflicts,
communication, leadership, power and politics and the like.
Individuals
•Personality
•Leadership
•Motivation
•Perception
Groups
•Team Work
•Group Dynamics
Organisational Structure
•Organisation Design
•Job Design
• Organizational behavior is the study of human behavior within organizations. The subject
encompasses the study of individual behavior, interpersonal behavior, and of the
organizations themselves.
– Intrapersonal behavior covers such aspects as personality, attitude, perception,
learning, opinion, motivation, job satisfaction, and stress management.
– Interpersonal behavior includes group dynamics, team dynamics, intergroup
conflict, leadership, communication, transaction analysis, and the like.
– About organizations, the study covers such aspects as their formation, structures,
effectiveness and formal and informal organizations.
• These three levels of analysis are not necessarily mutually exclusive. The field of
organizational behavior embraces them as being complementary. In the past, these three
levels of analysis were pursued with little co-ordination by behavioral scientists. Now,
however, a major contribution of those interested in OB is the attempt to integrate these
three levels of analysis, although this will require much effort. The individual focus is no
more important or valuable to the manager within an organization than is the group or
formal organizational focus. There is no need to choose one level of analysis and exclude
the others. Managers in business, health care, education, government, and religious
organizations all have problems in common that require an interdisciplinary approach.
This can be provided by OB because it emphasizes on all these levels of analysis — the
individual, the group, and the formal organization.
Opportunities of OB:
Stimulating
Empowering Dealing with
Innovation and
People Globalization
Change
Psychology: Psychology is the science that attempts to measure, explain, and at times change the
behavior of humans and other animals.
Sociology: Sociologists study the social system in which individuals fill their roles; that is,
sociology studies people in relation to their fellow human beings. Their significant contribution
to OB is through their study of group behavior in organizations, particularly formal and complex
organizations.
Social Psychology: Social psychology blends the concepts of psychology and sociology. It
focuses on the influence of people on one another. The major challenge deals with the issue of
how to implement it and how to reduce barriers to its acceptance.
Anthropology: Anthropology is the study of societies to learn about human beings and their
activities. Anthropologists work on cultures and environments; for example, they have aided in
understanding differences in fundamental values, attitudes, and behavior among people in
different countries and within different organizations.
Political Science: Contributions from political scientists for a better understanding of OB are
significant. Political scientists study the behaviors of individuals and groups within a political
environment. Specific topics of concern to political scientists include conflict resolution, group
coalition, allocation of power, and how people manipulate power in their self-interest. In the
past, the term ‘politics’ was considered to be a dirty word. Not any more now. Organizations are
becoming political entities and a better understanding of them cannot be had without
understanding the political perspective as well.
Apart from various behavioral sciences, other disciplines have also contributed to the
development of organizational behavior. They are:
Models of OB
Organizational behavior model is a basic structure that shows the relations between employees
at different levels in the organization. Organizational behavior model reflects the behavior of
the people and management all together, it is considered as field study not just a discipline.
Organization analyzes behavior of employees into three basic levels known as OB Model, they
are: – Individual level, Group level and Organizational system level.
Types of OB Models:
1. Autocratic Model;
2. Custodial Model;
3. Supportive Model;
4. Collegial Model; and
5. System Model
1. Autocratic Model: The autocratic model is the model that relies on strength, power and
formal authority. The autocratic model depends on power. Managers see authority as the only
means to get the things done and employees are expected to follow orders. So it results in the
higher dependence on the boss.
In an autocratic organization, the people (management/owners) managing the functions in an
organization have formal authority to control the employees working under them. These lower-
level employees have little control over the job assignments. His ideas and innovations are
generally not welcomed, as major decisions are made at the top management level.
The guiding principle behind this model is that management/owners have extensive business
expertise, and the average employee has a relatively low level of skill and needs to be thoroughly
directed. This type of autocratic management system was common in factories during the
Industrial Revolution era.
One of the more significant problems associated with the autocratic model is that the
management team needs to micro-manage the employees – where they have to look at all the
details and make every single decision. Clearly, in a more modern-day organization, where
highly paid specialists are hired, an autocratic system becomes impractical and highly inefficient.
The autocratic model also opposes job satisfaction and employee morale. This is because
employees do not feel valued and part of the overall team. This leads to low level of
performance. While the Autocratic model may be suitable for some much automated factory
situations, it is out of date for most modern outfits.
2. Custodial Model: – Workers being managed under the autocratic model often feel insecure
and disappointed. They may also show aggression towards their boss and their family and
neighbors. So progressive managers felt that something must happen ways to develop better
employee relations so that insecurities and frustrations could be removed. The custodial
approach induces employees now to show their dependency and loyalty towards the company
and not to the boss or managers, or supervisors. The employees in this environment are more
psychologically contended and preoccupied with their rewards, but it is not necessary they would
be strongly motivated to give the performance.
To overcome the shortcomings of autocratic model, it came into existence. This model is reward
based. More emphasis is on economic rewards and benefits to motivate employees.
The custodial model is based on the concept of providing economic security for employees –
through pay and other benefits that will create employee loyalty and motivation. In some
countries, many professional companies offer health benefits, corporate cars, financial packaging
of salaries, etc. – these are incentives designed to attract and retain quality employees.
The underlying principle for the organization is that they will have a more skilled workforce,
more motivated employees, and have a competitive advantage through employee knowledge and
expertise. The downside with the custodial model is that it also attracts and retains low-
performing employees. Or perhaps even some offer low-level motivation from employees who
feel they are “stuck” in an organization because the benefits are too good to leave.
3. Supportive Model: – The basic idea behind this theory is that leadership drives people to
work not the power of money as in the custodial model. Through leadership Management
provides an environment to help employees develop and fulfils the interests of the organization,
rather than the only things to support employee benefit payment as per custodial approach.
It works in the public sector organization which is dependent on effective leadership. Here, it is
assumed that workers are self directed and creative. Importance in this model is given to
psychological needs, self esteem, job satisfaction and friendly relations between superior-
subordinate.
Under the supportive model, workers feel a sense of participation and work participation in the
organization. The role of the manager is to help the employee and solve their problems and get
their work done. This model has been found to be effective in prosperous countries where
workers are more concerned about their higher levels need affiliation and esteem.
Unlike the earlier two approaches, the supportive model is centred around ambitious leadership.
It is not based on control and authority (autocratic model) or incentives (custodial model), but
instead tries to motivate employees through the manager-employee relationship and how
employees are treated on a day-to-day basis.
Quite the opposite of the autocratic model, this approach suggests that employees are self-
motivated and have the value and insight to contribute to the organization, beyond just their day-
to-day role.
This model aims to motivate employees through a positive workplace where their ideas are
encouraged and often adapted. Therefore, employees have some form of “buy-in” for the
organization and its direction.
The supportive model is widely accepted chiefly in the developed nations where the needs of the
employees are different as it fulfills many of the employees emerging needs. This approach is
less successful in the developing nations where the social and economic need of the working
class is different. In short, in the supportive model, money is not which retain the satisfaction of
the employees, but it is a part of the organization’s life that has been put to the use and makes
other people feel wanted.
4. Collegial Model: –A useful extension of the supportive model is the collegial model. This
word collegial means a body of individuals with a common purpose. The collegial model, which
embodies a term concept, first achieved widespread applications in research laboratories and
similar work environments. This is a best model based on the partnership between workers and
management in which both work together as a team and respect each other. Workers are satisfied
by their job and they are committed to the organization.
The collegial model traditionally was used theory is based on the principle of mutual
contribution by employer and employees. Each employee should develop a feeling that he is a
part of the whole and contributing something to the whole and recognizes the others
contribution. Management is supported to be joint contribution and not the boss.
The collegial model is based on teamwork – everyone working as a peer. The overall
environment and corporate culture needs to be aligned with this model, where everyone is
actively participating – not just about position and job title – for everyone to work together to
make a better organization is encouraged.
The role of the manager is to foster this teamwork and create positive and energetic workplaces.
In much more respect, the manager can be considered the “coach” of the team. And as a coach,
the goal is to keep the team doing well overall, rather than focusing on their own performance, or
the performances of key individuals.
The collegial model is quite effective in organizations that need to find new approaches –
marketing teams, research and development, technology/software – virtually anywhere the
competitive landscape is constantly changing and ideas and innovation are key competitive
success factors.
The success of the collegial model depends on the management’s ability to foster the feeling of
partnership between the employees. This makes the employees feel important and needed. They
also feel that managers are not just mere supervisors but are also giving their equal contribution
to the team. To make the collegial model success many organizations have abolished the use of
bosses and subordinates during working, as these terms create the distance between the managers
and subordinates. While some of the organizations have abolished the system of allotting
reserved space for executives. Now any employee can park their vehicle in the common parking
space, which increases their convenience and makes them more comfortable.
5. System Model: – The final organizational model is known as the system model. It is the most
contemporary model of the five models. In the system model, the organization looks at the
overall structure and team environment, and assumes that individuals have different goals,
talents, and abilities. The system model aims to try to balance the goals of the individual with the
goals of the organization. Individuals obviously want good remuneration, job security, but also
want to work in a positive work environment where the organization adds value to the
community and/or its customers. The model system should be a holistic partnership of managers
and employees with a common goal, and where everyone feels they have a stake in the
organization.
In the system model, the expectations of the managers are much more than getting the work done
by the employees. The managers have to show their emotional side, be more compassionate and
caring towards their team, and they must be sensitive towards the needs of the diverse workforce.
They have to devote their attention to creating the feeling of optimism, hope, trustworthiness,
courage, self-determination, and through this, they try to develop a positive work culture where
the employees feel more at ease and work as if they are working for their family. This ultimately
results in the long time commitment and loyalty of the employees and the success of the
company.